1
|
Del Giudice F, Asero V, Bologna E, Scornajenghi CM, Carino D, Dolci V, Viscuso P, Salciccia S, Sciarra A, D'Andrea D, Pradere B, Moschini M, Mari A, Albisinni S, Krajewski W, Szydełko T, Małkiewicz B, Nowak Ł, Laukhtina E, Gallioli A, Mertens LS, Marcq G, Cimadamore A, Afferi L, Soria F, Mori K, Tully KH, Pichler R, Ferro M, Tataru OS, Autorino R, Crivellaro S, Crocetto F, Busetto GM, Basran S, Eisenberg ML, Chung BI, De Berardinis E. Efficacy of Different Bacillus of Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Strains on Recurrence Rates among Intermediate/High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancers (NMIBCs): Single-Arm Study Systematic Review, Cumulative and Network Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15071937. [PMID: 37046598 PMCID: PMC10093360 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15071937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2023] [Revised: 03/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In an era of Bacillus of Calmette-Guérin (BCG) shortages, the comparative efficacy from different adjuvant intravesical BCG strains in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) has not been clearly elucidated. We aim to compare, through a systematic review and meta-analysis, the cumulative BC recurrence rates and the best efficacy profile of worldwide available BCG strains over the last forty years. METHODS PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from 1982 up to 2022. A meta-analysis of pooled BC recurrence rates was stratified for studies with ≤3-y vs. >3-y recurrence-free survival (RFS) endpoints and the strain of BCG. Sensitivity analysis, sub-group analysis, and meta-regression were implemented to investigate the contribution of moderators to heterogeneity. A random-effect network meta-analysis was performed to compare BCG strains on a multi-treatment level. RESULTS In total, n = 62 series with n = 15,412 patients in n = 100 study arms and n = 10 different BCG strains were reviewed. BCG Tokyo 172 exhibited the lowest pooled BC recurrence rate among studies with ≤3-y RFS (0.22 (95%CI 0.16-0.28). No clinically relevant difference was noted among strains at >3-y RFS outcomes. Sub-group and meta-regression analyses highlighted the influence of NMIBC risk-group classification and previous intravesical treated categories. Out of the n = 11 studies with n = 7 BCG strains included in the network, BCG RIVM, Tice, and Tokyo 172 presented with the best-predicted probability for efficacy, yet no single strain was significantly superior to another in preventing BC recurrence risk. CONCLUSION We did not identify a BCG stain providing a clinically significant lower BC recurrence rate. While these findings might discourage investment in future head-to-head randomized comparison, we were, however, able to highlight some potential enhanced benefits from the genetically different BCG RIVM, Tice, and Tokyo 172. This evidence would support the use of such strains for future BCG trials in NMIBCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5101, USA
| | - Vincenzo Asero
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Eugenio Bologna
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Maria Scornajenghi
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Dalila Carino
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Virginia Dolci
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Pietro Viscuso
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Salciccia
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Sciarra
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, 31130 Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Mari
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence-Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Simone Albisinni
- Urology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, Tor Vergata University Hospital, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wrocław Medical University, 50-367 Wrocław, Poland
| | - Tomasz Szydełko
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wrocław Medical University, 50-367 Wrocław, Poland
| | - Bartosz Małkiewicz
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wrocław Medical University, 50-367 Wrocław, Poland
| | - Łukasz Nowak
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wrocław Medical University, 50-367 Wrocław, Poland
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, 119435 Moscow, Russia
| | - Andrea Gallioli
- Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, 16444 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gautier Marcq
- Urology Department, Claude Huriez Hospital, CHU Lille, 59000 Lille, France
- Cancer Heterogeneity Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, UMR9020-U1277-CANTHER, Institut Pasteur de LilleCHU Lille, Inserm, CNRS University of Lille, 59000 Lille, France
| | - Alessia Cimadamore
- Department of Medical Area (DAME), Institute of Pathological Anatomy, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy
| | - Luca Afferi
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, 6004 Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Francesco Soria
- Urology Division, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Studies of Torino, 10124 Turin, Italy
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan
| | - Karl Heinrich Tully
- Department of Urology and Neurourology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44780 Herne, Germany
| | - Renate Pichler
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Innsbruck, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Octavian Sabin Tataru
- Department of Simulation Applied in Medicine, The Institution Organizing University Doctoral Studies (I.O.S.U.D.), George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences, and Technology, 540142 Târgu Mureș, Romania
| | - Riccardo Autorino
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
| | - Simone Crivellaro
- Health Sciences System, Department of Urology, University of Illinois Hospital e Camp, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, University of Naples "Federico II", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Gian Maria Busetto
- Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| | - Satvir Basran
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5101, USA
| | - Michael L Eisenberg
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5101, USA
| | - Benjamin Inbeh Chung
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5101, USA
| | - Ettore De Berardinis
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schmidt S, Kunath F, Coles B, Draeger DL, Krabbe L, Dersch R, Kilian S, Jensen K, Dahm P, Meerpohl JJ. Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin versus mitomycin C for Ta and T1 bladder cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 1:CD011935. [PMID: 31912907 PMCID: PMC6956215 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011935.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder are at risk for recurrence and progression following transurethral resection of a bladder tumour (TURBT). Mitomycin C (MMC) and Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) are commonly used, competing forms of intravesical therapy for intermediate- or high-risk non-muscle invasive (Ta and T1) urothelial bladder cancer but their relative merits are somewhat uncertain. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of BCG intravesical therapy compared to MMC intravesical therapy for treating intermediate- and high-risk Ta and T1 bladder cancer in adults. SEARCH METHODS We performed a systematic literature search in multiple databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, LILACS), as well as in two clinical trial registries. We searched reference lists of relevant publications and abstract proceedings. We applied no language restrictions. The latest search was conducted in September 2019. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared intravesical BCG with intravesical MMC therapy for non-muscle invasive urothelial bladder cancer. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently screened the literature, extracted data, assessed risk of bias and rated the quality of evidence according to GRADE per outcome. In the meta-analyses, we used the random-effects model. MAIN RESULTS We identified 12 RCTs comparing BCG versus MMC in participants with intermediate- and high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder tumours (published from 1995 to 2013). In total, 2932 participants were randomised. Time to death from any cause: BCG may make little or no difference on time to death from any cause compared to MMC (hazard ratio (HR) 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79 to 1.20; participants = 1132, studies = 5; 567 participants in the BCG arm and 565 in the MMC arm; low-certainty evidence). This corresponds to 6 fewer deaths (40 fewer to 36 more) per 1000 participants treated with BCG at five years. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence two levels due to study limitations and imprecision. Serious adverse effects: 12/577 participants treated with BCG experienced serious non-fatal adverse effects compared to 4/447 participants in the MMC group. The pooled risk ratio (RR) is 2.31 (95% CI 0.82 to 6.52; participants = 1024, studies = 5; low-certainty evidence). Therefore, BCG may increase the risk for serious adverse effects compared to MMC. This corresponds to nine more serious adverse effects (one fewer to 37 more) with BCG. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence two levels due to study limitations and imprecision. Time to recurrence: BCG may reduce the time to recurrence compared to MMC (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.09; participants = 2616, studies = 11, 1273 participants in the BCG arm and 1343 in the MMC arm; low-certainty evidence). This corresponds to 41 fewer recurrences (104 fewer to 29 more) with BCG at five years. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence two levels due to study limitations, imprecision and inconsistency. Time to progression: BCG may make little or no difference on time to progression compared to MMC (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.26; participants = 1622, studies = 6; 804 participants in the BCG arm and 818 in the MMC arm; low-certainty evidence). This corresponds to four fewer progressions (29 fewer to 27 more) with BCG at five years. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence two levels due to study limitations and imprecision. Quality of life: we found very limited data for this outcomes and were unable to estimate an effect size. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Based on our findings, BCG may reduce the risk of recurrence over time although the Confidence Intervals include the possibility of no difference. It may have no effect on either the risk of progression or risk of death from any cause over time. BCG may cause more serious adverse events although the Confidence Intervals once again include the possibility of no difference. We were unable to determine the impact on quality of life. The certainty of the evidence was consistently low, due to concerns that include possible selection bias, performance bias, given the lack of blinding in these studies, and imprecision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Schmidt
- UroEvidence@Deutsche Gesellschaft für UrologieMartin‐Buber‐Str. 10BerlinGermany14163
| | - Frank Kunath
- UroEvidence@Deutsche Gesellschaft für UrologieMartin‐Buber‐Str. 10BerlinGermany14163
- University Hospital ErlangenDepartment of UrologyKrankenhausstrasse 12ErlangenGermany91054
| | - Bernadette Coles
- Cardiff University Library ServicesVelindre NHS TrustVelindre Cancer CentreWhitchurchCardiffUKCF14 2TL
| | - Desiree Louise Draeger
- UroEvidence@Deutsche Gesellschaft für UrologieMartin‐Buber‐Str. 10BerlinGermany14163
- University of RostockDepartment of UrologyErnst‐Heydemann‐Strasse 7RostockMecklenburg‐VorpommernGermany18057
| | - Laura‐Maria Krabbe
- UroEvidence@Deutsche Gesellschaft für UrologieMartin‐Buber‐Str. 10BerlinGermany14163
- University of Muenster Medical CenterDepartment of UrologyAlbert‐Schweitzer Campus 1, GB A1MuensterNRWGermany48149
| | - Rick Dersch
- Medical Center – University of FreiburgDepartment of Neurology and NeurophysiologyBerliner Allee 29FreiburgGermany79110
| | - Samuel Kilian
- University of HeidelbergInstitute of Medical Biometry and InformaticsHeidelbergGermany
| | - Katrin Jensen
- University of HeidelbergInstitute of Medical Biometry and InformaticsHeidelbergGermany
| | - Philipp Dahm
- Minneapolis VA Health Care SystemUrology SectionOne Veterans DriveMail Code 112DMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA55417
- University of MinnesotaDepartment of Urology420 Delaware Street SEMMC 394MinneapolisMinnesotaUSA55455
| | - Joerg J Meerpohl
- Medical Center ‐ University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of
FreiburgInstitute for Evidence in MedicineBreisacher Str. 153FreiburgGermanyD‐79110
| | | |
Collapse
|