Chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for thoracic esophageal cancer potentially or actually involving adjacent organs

Preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy provides borderline resectable thoracic esophageal cancer with equivalent treatment results as clinically T3 thoracic esophageal cancer

Aim

Because the optimal treatment strategy for borderline resectable (cT3br) thoracic esophageal cancer patients remains unclear, it is of great interest whether preoperative neoadjuvant therapy for cT3br could achieve results comparable to those seen with resectable T3 cancer (cT3r). We speculated that preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) would be particularly effective in cT3br thoracic esophageal cancer patients and compared to cT3br and cT3r.

Methods

Of 186 cT3 thoracic esophageal cancer patients treated with intended NACRT, 162 received radical esophagectomy. More than 97% were squamous cell carcinomas. Patients were partitioned into two groups according to whether invasion of adjacent organs was suspected (cT3br and cT3r). Treatment outcomes and survival were analyzed.

Results

Sixty-eight patients (36.6%) were classified as cT3br and 118 (63.4%) as cT3r. The cT3br group had significantly more tumors in the upper and middle mediastinum (p < 0.0001) and more cases with cM1 (lymph node) (p = 0.0104) than the cT3r group. In addition, the cT3br patients receiving esophagectomy exhibited a significantly lower pathological complete response rate than the cT3r patients (p = 0.0374). However, the R0 resection rate did not differ between the cT3br and cT3r patients (p = 0.0978), and the two groups treated with intended NACRT had similar 5-year overall (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) (p = 0.3831 and p = 0.9020). In addition, the incidence and patterns of recurrence did not differ between the cT3br and cT3r patients receiving esophagectomy (p = 0.8109 and p = 0.3128).

Conclusions

Preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy appears to be a promising treatment for patients with borderline resectable thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Multimodal Treatment Strategies to Improve the Prognosis of Locally Advanced Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Narrative Review

Esophageal cancer is the seventh most common malignancy and sixth most common cause of cancer-related death globally. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with aortic or tracheal invasion is considered unresectable, and has an extremely poor prognosis; its standard treatment is definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). In recent years, induction chemotherapy (ICT) has been reported to yield high response rates for locally advanced ESCC, and the efficacy and safety of ICT followed by conversion surgery (CS) have been investigated. Multimodal treatment, combining surgery with induction chemoradiotherapy (ICRT) or ICT, is necessary to improve ESCC prognosis. CS is generally performed for locally advanced ECC after ICRT or ICT when tumor downstaging is achieved, although its prognostic benefit remains controversial. The Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) has conducted a three-arm phase III randomized controlled trial (JCOG1510) to confirm the superiority of DCF (docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil) ICT, over conventional dCRT, among patients with initially unresectable ESCC. In recent years, researchers have reported favorable outcomes of induction therapy followed by CS and salvage surgery, after dCRT or systemic immunochemotherapy. In this review, we will describe the latest developments in the multimodal treatment including chemotherapy, CRT, surgery, and immunotherapy, which may improve oncological and survival outcomes for patients with cT4 ESCC.

Survival rates and safety associated with chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery and chemoradiotherapy alone for patients with T4 esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment approach for T4 esophageal cancer is not well established. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the survival rates and safety of chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (CRT-S) and chemoradiotherapy alone (CRT) in patients with T4 N_any M0 esophageal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched databases for eligible prospective or retrospective studies. The outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) at 1, 3 and 5 years, treatment-related fistula formation and mortality rates. Meta-analyses were performed using the random effects models separately for studies evaluating CRT-S and CRT. Subgroup analyses were performed based on histology, radiation dose, chemotherapy regimen and duration of the interval between CRT and surgery.

RESULTS

We identified 23 studies including 1,119 patients with predominantly squamous cell carcinoma (93%) and adenocarcinoma (3%) histology. The OS rates of patients receiving CRT-S were 65%, 36% and 20% at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. The OS rates of patients receiving CRT were 30%, 11% and 10% at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. Treatment-related fistula formation rates were 4% for CRT-S and 9% for CRT. Treatment-related mortality rates were 3% for both groups. Subgroup analyses showed that the interval of >2 months between CRT and surgery was associated with significantly improved OS rates at 1, 3 and 5 years.

CONCLUSION

Chemoradiotherapy is an efficacious treatment approach for T4 esophageal cancer, with clinically acceptable rates of treatment-related fistula formation and mortality. Tri-modality approach with surgery can be considered in carefully selected patients. Our study findings should be interpreted with caution due to the lack of high-quality evidence. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these findings.

Surgical strategies for treatment of clinical T4 esophageal cancer in Japan

Definitive chemoradiation (dCRT) is the mainstay treatment for cStage IVa esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with good performance status (PS), according to standard practice guidelines. Salvage surgery may incur operation complications and risk of mortality. According to the esophageal cancer practice guidelines outlined by the Japan Esophageal Society, when a tumor is residual and recurrent, chemotherapy and palliative symptomatic treatment is continued. However, salvage operation has been selected as a therapeutic option for recurrent or residual tumors after dCRT. There is weak evidence for not recommending surgery for cStage IVa ESCC exhibiting residual disease following dCRT. It has been reported that during salvage surgery the only prognostic factor that is thought to be performed is complete resection (R0), but at the same time, salvage esophagectomy increases the incidence of postoperative complications and mortality. The phase II chemoselection study by Yokota T et al. in Japan showed that multidisciplinary treatment initiated by induction therapy, in which docetaxel is added to cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil, resulted in a good prognosis in the short term. In this review, we discuss the surgical strategy and future of unresectable clinical T4 (cT4) ESCC.

Feasibility of conversion thoracoscopic esophagectomy after induction therapy for locally advanced unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Recently, patients with cT4b esophageal cancer often require conversion surgery following induction therapy, for which the standard procedure is open esophagectomy. However, thoracoscopic esophagectomy, including thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position, is increasingly used. We compared short-term outcomes of thoracoscopic esophagectomy and open esophagectomy in this setting.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 14 patients who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy, and 10 who underwent open esophagectomy, for locally advanced unresectable esophageal cancer after induction therapy between March 2007 and July 2020.

RESULTS

The two groups did not significantly differ in patient background. Median total and thoracic surgical times were both significantly longer for open esophagectomy than for thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Median blood loss was also greater in the open esophagectomy group than in the thoracoscopic esophagectomy group. The thoracoscopic esophagectomy group also had significantly shorter median chest drain duration; and lower C-reactive protein levels on the second and third postoperative days. The two groups did not significantly differ in total complications or postoperative hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracoscopic esophagectomy is as safe and feasible as open esophagectomy for conversion surgery after induction therapy for locally advanced unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Comparison of Aggressive Planned Salvage Surgery Versus Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Plus Surgery for Borderline Resectable T4 Squamous Cell Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

We compare planned salvage surgery after definitive chemoradiotherapy (SALV) versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery (NCRS) for borderline resectable T4 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 37 patients underwent planned SALV, and 20 underwent NCRS from 2004 to 2017. The short-term outcome measures were the R0 resection rate, complications, and treatment-related mortality. The long-term outcome measures were the 5-year overall survival rate and causes of death.

RESULTS

R0 resection rate was similar between the SALV and NCRS groups (81% versus 85%). The incidence of postoperative pneumonia (35% versus 18%) and treatment-related mortality rate (9% versus 0%) tended to be higher in the SALV. ypT grade 2-3 (65% versus 30%, p = 0.012) and Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIb complications (32% versus 0%, p = 0.008) were significantly more frequent in the SALV group. The groups had similar 5-year overall survival (26% versus 27%). The causes of death in the SALV and NCRS groups were primary esophageal cancer in 35% and 55% of patients, respectively, and pulmonary-related mortality in 24% and 5%, respectively. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed the following significant poor prognostic factors: stable disease as the clinical response, preoperative body mass index (BMI) of < 18.5 kg/m², ypN stage 1-3, and R1-2 resection.

CONCLUSIONS

SALV was associated with a higher incidence of late pulmonary-related mortality but had a stronger antitumor effect than NCRS. Consequently, the survival rate was similar between the groups. Surgery is recommended for patients with a partial response and preoperative BMI of ≥ 18.5 kg/m².

Definitive chemoradiotherapy for clinical T4b esophageal cancer - Treatment outcomes, failure patterns, and prognostic factors

PURPOSE

The management of cT4b thoracic esophageal cancer (EC) is challenging. The optimal treatment remains unclear, and prospective or large-scale retrospective reports on treatment outcomes are lacking. The present study was conducted to investigate the treatment outcomes, failure patterns, treatment responses, and prognostic factors focusing on cT4b thoracic EC treated by definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCRT).

METHODS

A retrospective review of cT4b thoracic EC patients treated with curative intent dCRT at our institution between 2009 and 2017 was conducted. Survival analysis was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and prognostic factors were examined by the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

A total of 95 cT4b EC patients were included, and the median survival was 11.4 months. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates were 49.4%, 22.2%, and 19.0%, respectively. Forty-six patients (48.4%) experienced locoregional failure, 3 patients (3.2%) developed distant metastasis, and 11 patients had synchronous locoregional and distant failure. The corresponding 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year locoregional failure rates were 62.6%, 74.5%, and 79.2%, respectively. The treatment response rate was 76.9%, and clinical complete response was achieved in 25.3% of patients. Multivariable analysis revealed that age ≤ 65 (p = 0.003), pre-dCRT body mass index (BMI) > 21 (p < 0.001), clinical N stage 0-1 (p = 0.014), and tumor length ≤ 6 cm (p = 0.026) were independent prognosticators for better survival.

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed that long-term survival is achievable for cT4b EC patients treated by dCRT, with a 3-year survival rate of more than 20%. Locoregional recurrence was the most common failure pattern. Age, BMI, N stage, and tumor length were significant prognosticators for survival in this group of patients.

T4 cervical esophageal cancer cured with modern chemoradiotherapy: A case report

BACKGROUND

T4 esophageal cancer portends a poor prognosis, particularly when it is complicated by a tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) either resulting from disease or occurring as a complication of treatment. Patients with TEF that occurs during treatment are commonly treated with palliative intent because fistula-associated treatment complications such as aspiration pneumonia and mediastinitis are associated with high morbidity and mortality. To date, there is no clear evidence on the optimal treatment of T4 esophageal cancer, particularly when a TEF formation occurs.

CASE SUMMARY

A 67-year-old gentleman who presented with dysphagia and weight loss. Endoscopy and imaging revealed a T4N1M0 cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. He received image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy, with concurrent weekly carboplatin (area under curve 2 mg/mL per minute) and paclitaxel (50 mg/m² of body surface area). One week after treatment initiation (16.2 Gy thus far), he developed cough on swallowing. A TEF was detected on image-guided radiation therapy using cone-beam computed tomography during the treatment course, for which a tracheal stent was inserted. After discussing the risks and morbidity of continuing treatment, he resumed chemoradiotherapy with an additional radiation dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions. Three months after completion of chemoradiotherapy, he developed an esophageal stricture that required esophageal stenting and dilatation. The patient remains cancer-free at two year on follow-up. Complete response of esophageal cancer was evident on post-treatment endoscopy and computed tomography imaging, with successful closure of TEF.

CONCLUSION

This case highlights that successful curative treatment for esophageal cancer complicated by a TEF is possible using novel chemotherapeutic regimens and modern radiation technologies.

Definitive chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: outcomes for borderline-resectable disease

Definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) is the standard treatment for unresectable esophageal cancer. Induction chemotherapy has been actively investigated for borderline-resectable and unresectable disease, but the superiority over dCRT has yet to be confirmed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of dCRT with special interest in borderline-resectable disease. Patients with esophageal cancer treated with dCRT between January 2004 and November 2016 were included in this retrospective analysis. Chemotherapy consisted of two cycles of cisplatin (70-75 mg/m2) on day 1 and 5-fluorouracil (700-1000 mg/m2 per day) on days 1-4 or low-dose cisplatin (10 mg/m2 per day) and 5-fluorouracil (175 mg/m2 per day) for 20 days. Radiotherapy was given with a daily fraction of 1.8-2 Gy to a total dose of 50-70 Gy. A total of 104 patients were included: 34 were resectable, 35 were borderline-resectable and 35 were unresectable. Complete response was achieved in 44 patients (42%). Eighteen patients (17%) suffered Grade 2 or greater cardiopulmonary toxicity and seven patients (7%) suffered Grade 3 cardiopulmonary toxicity. At the time of this analysis, 59 patients were dead and 45 were censored. The 3-year overall survival proportions for resectable, borderline-resectable and unresectable patients were 64%, 46% and 21%, respectively. The overall survival for borderline-resectable patients with complete response and noncomplete response was significantly different (P < 0.001), with 3-year survival of 70% and 8%, respectively. The overall survival for complete response patients with borderline-resectable disease was encouraging. Further investigation to find a subgroup fit for esophagus-preserving treatment is warranted.

Tracheal resection and anterior mediastinal tracheostomy in the multidisciplinary treatment of esophageal cancer with tracheal invasion

Combined tracheal resection and anterior mediastinal tracheostomy (AMT) for esophageal cancer with tracheal invasion is a challenging treatment because of its high morbidity and the lack of evidence regarding long-term outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the short- and long-term outcomes of AMT as part of the multidisciplinary treatment for esophageal cancer with tracheal invasion. This retrospective study included 27 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer with tracheal invasion who underwent combined tracheal resection and AMT in their multidisciplinary treatment for esophageal cancer. We evaluated postoperative complications, body weight loss, and survival and examined the prognostic value of preoperative factors. All patients underwent chemotherapy and/or chemoradiotherapy as prior treatment. R0 resection was achieved in all cases. Clavien-Dindo grade I or greater complications occurred in 17 patients (63%), and grade III or greater complications occurred in 12 (44%). Overall in-hospital mortality was 4%, with one patient dying on postoperative day 48 when the brachiocephalic artery ruptured from tracheal compression. The 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 0% and 4%, respectively. Median weight change in patients without recurrence in the year after surgery was -1.7% (-9.6-21%). All of these patients received nutrition by oral intake and were living independently at home without public assistance. The 3- and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 25.9% and 18.5%, respectively; 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 38.6% and 25.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified response to prior treatment as an independent prognostic factor in these patients. Combined tracheal resection and AMT may be adapted as part of the multidisciplinary treatment of esophageal cancer with tracheal invasion. Improving AMT safety and optimizing patient selection may improve prognosis among patients with this cancer.

Appropriate Candidates for Salvage Esophagectomy of Initially Unresectable Locally Advanced T4 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Standard treatment for unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer is definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). Although salvage esophagectomy is the only curative treatment available following dCRT failure, the appropriate candidates for salvage esophagectomy remain unclear.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three hundred seventeen patients who underwent dCRT from April 2004 to December 2016 were stratified into three study groups-a complete response (CR) group, chemotherapy or best supportive care (BSC) group, and salvage esophagectomy group-and compared. We also investigated the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of salvage esophagectomy.

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients (22.4%) achieved CR after dCRT, 18 patients (5.7%) underwent salvage esophagectomy, and 228 patients (71.9%) underwent palliative chemotherapy or BSC. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of the CR group, salvage esophagectomy group, and chemotherapy or BSC group were 83.0%, 51.6%, and 1.3%, respectively. Salvage esophagectomy recipients had a worse OS rate than CR patients (p < 0.001) but a better OS rate than those in the chemotherapy or BSC group (p < 0.001). Incomplete resection was the only significant variable associated with poor OS on univariate Cox proportional-hazards analysis (hazard ratio: 7.633, 95% confidence interval: 1.692-34.482; p = 0.008). Patients with tumors in the upper thoracic esophagus were more likely to undergo incomplete resection (p = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who achieve R0 resection are good candidates for salvage esophagectomy regardless of their response to dCRT. Those with upper thoracic esophageal tumors are at risk of incomplete resection; careful attention is required when considering these patients for salvage esophagectomy.

Safety of thoracoscopic esophagectomy after induction chemotherapy for locally advanced unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Recent studies have reported that induction chemotherapy with docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) is an effective treatment for unresectable, locally advanced esophageal cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and feasibility of thoracoscopic esophagectomy (TE) after DCF for initially unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

Twenty-three patients with initially unresectable T4 thoracic ESCC underwent TE after induction DCF.

RESULTS

The neighboring organs with tumors were the tracheobronchus in nine patients, thoracic aorta in 13, and pericardium and diaphragm in three each (concurrent overlapping invasion occurred in five patients). The mean total operation time was 556.3 ± 107.2 minutes, and the mean time of the thoracic procedure was 258.9 ± 83.9 minutes. The mean total blood loss was 166.2 ± 117.8 mL, and the loss during the thoracic procedure was 33.5 ± 24.6 mL. All patients achieved complete R0 resection under TE. No conversions to open thoracotomy were performed. The postoperative morbidity rate was 34.8%. The postoperative hospital stay was 24.3 (range, 13-38) days. Five patients had recurrence: four had distant metastasis (lung, two; liver, three; and one with overlap), and one had mediastinal lymph node recurrence. No local recurrence was noted at the site of the primary T4 tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

TE was safely performed in 23 patients after DCF therapy for locally advanced unresectable ESCC. Induction DCF, followed by TE, could be an alternative treatment for unresectable T4 ESCC.

Phase III study of tri-modality combination therapy with induction docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus definitive chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced unresectable squamous-cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG1510: TRIANgLE)

A randomized phase III trial commenced in Japan in February 2018. Definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil is the current standard treatment for locally advanced unresectable esophageal carcinoma. The purpose of this study is to confirm the superiority of induction chemotherapy with docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) followed by conversion surgery or definitive CRT over definitive CRT alone for overall survival (OS) in patients with locally advanced unresectable squamous-cell carcinoma of thoracic esophagus. A total of 230 patients will be accrued from 47 Japanese institutions over 4.5 years. The primary endpoint is OS, and the secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, complete response rate of CRT, response rate of DCF, adverse events of DCF and CRT, late adverse events and surgical complications. This trial has been registered at the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials as jRCTs031180181.

Salvage esophagectomy for initially unresectable locally advanced T4 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a potentially curative treatment modality, even for patients with unresectable T4 tumors. For patients who fail dCRT, salvage esophagectomy is known to be a high-risk procedure. However, the efficacy and safety of salvage surgery for these patients remain unclear.

METHODS

A total of 35 patients who underwent salvage esophagectomy after dCRT for initially unresectable locally advanced T4 ESCC were assessed, and both outcomes and prognostic factors after surgery were investigated.

RESULTS

Among the study population, R0 resection was achieved in 19 patients (54.3%). Postoperatively, 8 patients (22.9%) experienced Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb or higher complications, and 3 patients (8.6%) registered surgery-related mortality. Overall survival rates were 45.7%, 28.6%, and 5.7% at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. In Cox regression analysis, residual or relapsed tumor limited to T2 or less was an independent prognostic factor for better survival (P = 0.010). On the other hand, postoperative pneumonia and incomplete resection were negative prognostic factors (P < 0.001 and P = 0.019, respectively). Nodal involvement and extent of lymph node dissection did not impact patient survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Although salvage esophagectomy for initially unresectable T4 ESCC is considered a high-risk surgery with poor prognosis, long-term survival may be achieved in patients with ≤ T2 residual tumors. In addition, R0 resection and postoperative pneumonia prevention are crucial to improve patient survival.

Feasibility of extended chemoradiotherapy plus surgery for patients with cT4b esophageal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Treatment of cT4b esophageal carcinoma usually consists of definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). However, outcome after dCRT in these patients is poor. Whether surgery should have a place in the treatment of cT4b esophageal cancer is still subject to debate. Goal of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of esophagectomy after extended chemoradiotherapy in patients with cT4b esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Patients with cT4b esophageal carcinoma, as determined by endoscopic ultrasound and (PET-)CT, were eligible for this phase-2 study. Patients were treated with weekly carboplatin + paclitaxel with 50.4 Gy radiotherapy in 28 fractions for 5.5 weeks followed by an explorative thoracotomy and esophagectomy if deemed feasible.

RESULTS

From July 2011 through March 2013, 16 patients were enrolled. Five patients did not undergo surgery because of detection of distant metastases during/after CRT (n = 3), unwillingness to undergo surgery (n = 1) or death before start of CRT (n = 1). Of the 13 patients who completed CRT, 3 patients experienced major hematologic toxicity (grade 3). A radical (R0) resection was achieved in 9 of 11 patients. Postoperative complications occurred in 9 patients. A reoperation was performed in 2 patients and 2 patients died in hospital after surgery. Three patients developed recurrent disease (1 locoregional and 2 systemic) after a mean interval of 17 months. Median overall survival of all included patients was 14.3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In certain patients with cT4b esophageal carcinoma a radical resection can be accomplished after chemoradiotherapy. However, this treatment is associated with considerable complications and should therefore be reserved for physically fit patients.

NETHERLANDS TRIAL REGISTER NUMBER

NTR3060.

Clinical Implications of Conversion Surgery After Induction Therapy for T4b Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Definitive chemoradiation therapy or chemotherapy alone is generally recommended for patients with unresectable cT4b esophageal cancer. However, conversion surgery has emerged as a therapeutic option when downstaging is achieved by induction therapy.

METHODS

We studied 169 patients with cT4 esophageal cancer who underwent induction therapy. Survival and prognostic factors were examined.

RESULTS

Of 169 patients, 25 who achieved a clinical complete response (cCR) underwent surveillance, 72 patients underwent conversion surgery, while another 72 patients whose tumors were regarded as unresectable after induction therapy did not undergo surgery. Among 169 patients, the 3- and 5-year survival rates were 31.0% and 25.9%, respectively. Sixty-four patients who underwent curative resection showed better survival comparable with survival of 25 patients who achieved cCR (3- and 5-year survival; 56.8% and 48.6% versus 64.0% and 52.0%, respectively). However, the survival of eight patients who underwent noncurative resection was as dismal as that of patients who did not undergo conversion surgery. Multivariate analysis in 169 patients identified female sex and achieving cCR or R0 resection as independent prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis in 72 patients who underwent conversion surgery identified sex, lymph node status, and R0 resection as independent prognostic factors in patients with cT4b esophageal cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed that conversion surgery after induction therapy can be a potentially curative treatment option for select patients with cT4b esophageal cancer. An important issue for further research is to establish a method for more accurately diagnosing tumor resectability after induction therapy for cT4b esophageal cancer.

Surgery Is Associated With Survival Benefit in T4a Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A National Analysis

BACKGROUND

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend consideration of surgery for clinical T4a esophageal adenocarcinoma. There are limited data on the outcomes of patients with T4a adenocarcinoma treated with surgery vs definitive chemoradiation, however.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients from 2010-2015 with clinical T4aN0-3M0 esophageal adenocarcinoma, and grouped by receipt of surgery (with or without perioperative therapy) or definitive, concurrent chemoradiation. Patients receiving incomplete definitive therapy or with missing survival information were excluded. Overall survival was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard analyses.

RESULTS

Of 182 patients in the study, 85 (47%) underwent esophagectomy and 97 (53%) underwent chemoradiation. In the surgery cohort, 79 patients (93%) received perioperative chemotherapy. Unadjusted and multivariable analyses demonstrated a significant survival benefit associated with surgery compared with definitive chemoradiotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio 0.32; 95% confidence interval 0.21, 0.50). A 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis of 63 patient pairs also revealed a significant overall survival benefit with surgery compared with chemoradiotherapy alone (hazard ratio 0.26; 95% confidence interval 0.16, 0.43).

CONCLUSIONS

In this national analysis, surgery for cT4a esophageal adenocarcinoma was associated with improved outcomes when compared with definitive chemoradiation. Surgery should be considered for medically fit patients with cT4aN0-3M0 esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Treatment and clinical outcome of clinical T4 esophageal cancer: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Survival of patients with cT4 esophageal cancer is dismal. Although the optimal treatment strategy remains to be established, two treatment options are available for cT4 esophageal cancers: definitive chemoradiation (dCRT) and induction treatment followed by conversion surgery (CS). However, little is known concerning the differences in clinical outcome between patients with T4 esophageal tumors treated with dCRT and those eventually treated with CS.

METHODS

A systematic search of the scientific literature on PubMed/MEDLINE was carried out using the keywords "T4 esophageal cancer," "invading (involving) adjacent organ," "definitive chemoradiation," "induction therapy," "salvage surgery," and "conversion surgery," obtaining 28 reports published up to July 2018.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

We found that CS was superior to dCRT with respect to local disease control and short-term survival; however, CS was associated with relatively higher perioperative mortality and morbidity. Alternatively, although dCRT might often cause fistula formation, a clinical complete response to dCRT is likely to lead to a better prognosis. Recent advances in chemotherapeutic agents have led to triple induction chemotherapy, with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF), which has shown promise as an initial induction treatment for cT4 esophageal cancer. Indeed, this regimen could control both local and systemic disease, which enables curative resection without preoperative CRT. Moreover, some appropriate changes in perioperative management and intensive systemic chemotherapy might enhance patient outcome. Randomized controlled trials with a large sample size are needed to establish the standard treatment for cT4 esophageal cancer.

Long-Term Outcome of Definitive Chemoradiotherapy and Induction Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery for T4 Esophageal Cancer with Tracheobronchial Invasion

BACKGROUND

T4 esophageal cancer (EC) that invades the trachea or bronchus often has poorer prognosis than other T4 ECs. We investigated the long-term results of definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) or induction chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (iCRT-S) in patients with T4 EC with tracheobronchial invasion (TBI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 2003 to 2013, 71 patients with T4 EC with TBI were treated in our institution; 58 underwent dCRT, and 13 underwent iCRT-S. The long-term results associated with survival were retrospectively analyzed, and prognostic factors were examined by univariable and multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

The 1-, 2-, and 5-year overall survival for all patients with T4 EC with TBI treated by dCRT or iCRT-S was 57, 29, and 19%, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed that clinical lymph node (LN) metastasis and the treatment period were significant prognostic factors. Clinical LN positivity had significantly poorer prognosis than LN negativity. The treatment outcome in the later period was significantly better than that in the earlier period. In particular, the outcome after dCRT revealed significantly better prognosis in the later compared with the earlier period, whereas the outcome after iCRT-S did not show such a difference. With respect to treatment modality, no significant difference in survival was observed between dCRT and iCRT-S.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical LN negativity and later treatment period were significantly good prognostic factors for T4 EC with TBI. The recent improvements in dCRT outcomes may help to achieve survival comparable to that of iCRT-S.

Utility of initial induction chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and docetaxel (DCF) for T4 esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis

Although no consensus is available on the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) invading adjacent organs (T4), establishing effective induction treatments is crucial to altering an unresectable status and achieving curative resection. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of chemotherapy using 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and docetaxel (DCF) as the initial induction treatment for T4 ESCC. Fifty patients without distant metastasis who underwent initial induction chemotherapy using DCF for T4 ESCC were propensity score-matched with 50 patients who underwent radiotherapy concurrent with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CRT). In the DCF group, 24 (48.0%) patients underwent surgery, achieving a 64% clinical response rate compared to 72.0% for induction CRT. CRT was also performed in another 24 (48.0%) patients in the DCF group in whom surgical resection was not indicated. The DCF group had significantly higher overall resectability than the CRT group (78.0% vs. 48.0%, P = 0.0017). The esophageal perforation rate during induction treatments was significantly lower in the DCF group than the CRT group (4.0% vs. 18.0%, P = 0.0205). Prognosis was significantly better in the DCF group than the CRT group (5-year cancer-specific survival 42.1% vs. 22.2%, P = 0.0146). Thus, induction DCF chemotherapy in patients with T4 ESCC reduced esophageal perforation and increased overall resectability, leading to better survival than CRT alone. Therefore, DCF chemotherapy may be an effective and safe option for initial induction treatment of T4 ESCC.

Esophageal stenosis and the Glasgow Prognostic Score as independent factors of poor prognosis for patients with locally advanced unresectable esophageal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy (exploratory analysis of JCOG0303)

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the possible prognostic factors and predictive accuracy of the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) for patients with unresectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LAESCC) treated with chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS

One hundred forty-two patients were enrolled in JCOG0303 and assigned to the standard cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (PF)-radiotherapy (RT) group or the low-dose PF-RT group. One hundred thirty-one patients with sufficient data were included in this analysis. A Cox regression model was used to analyze the prognostic factors of patients with unresectable LAESCC treated with PF-RT. The GPS was classified based on the baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum albumin levels. Patients with CRP ≤1.0 mg/dL and albumin ≥3.5 g/dL were classified as GPS0. If only CRP was increased or only albumin was decreased, the patients were classified as GPS1, and the patients with CRP >1.0 mg/dL and albumin <3.5 g/dL were classified as GPS2.

RESULTS

The patients' backgrounds were as follows: median age (range), 62 (37-75); male/female, 119/12; ECOG PS 0/1/2, 64/65/2; and clinical stage (UICC 5th) IIB/III/IVA/IVB, 3/75/22/31. Multivariable analyses indicated only esophageal stenosis as a common factor for poor prognosis. In addition, overall survival tended to decrease according to the GPS subgroups (median survival time (months): GPS0/GPS1/GPS2 16.1/14.9/8.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal stenosis was identified as a candidate stratification factor for randomized trials of unresectable LAESCC patients. Furthermore, GPS represents a prognostic factor for LAESCC patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.

CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION

UMIN000000861.

Treatment results of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by radical esophagectomy in patients with initially inoperable thoracic esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

We evaluated the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by esophagectomy for cT4 esophageal cancer or lymph node metastases (LNM) invading adjacent structures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 42 consecutive patients with thoracic esophageal cancer who underwent CRT followed by esophagectomy between 2008 and 2013. All were initially considered to be unresectable because of cT4 (n = 32) disease or LN invasion (n = 10). Radiotherapy was administered at 41.4 Gy/23 fr with concurrent chemotherapy. At completion of CRT, restaging was performed using computed tomography (CT).

RESULTS

All cT4 tumors were downstaged, LNM invading to adjacent structures were considered to be released, and subtotal esophagectomy was performed. The median follow-up period was 42 months. The curative resection (R0) rate was 94% in cT4 group and 70% in LN invasion group. The 3-year overall survival (OS) and 3-year locoregional control (LRC) rates were 65-80% in the cT4 group and 50-67% in LN invasion group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The cT4 group showed good rates of R0, OS, and LRC. Surgical resection should be an effective option when downstaging is achieved by CRT for patients with initially inoperable thoracic esophageal cancer.

Adjuvant chemotherapy and outcomes in esophageal carcinoma

Background

Standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer is neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery. The role of postoperative chemotherapy is unclear. We sought to determine the indications, patterns, and outcomes for adjuvant chemotherapy in esophageal carcinoma.

Methods

This single institution retrospective review included patients with esophageal cancer who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery at Moffitt. We identified patients in this cohort who additionally received adjuvant chemotherapy. Medical records were reviewed for demographic/clinical information. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank. Case-control analysis was performed using a 2:1 nearest neighbor propensity score matching algorithm, which included 92 without adjuvant chemotherapy and 46 with adjuvant chemotherapy.

Results

We identified 382 patients, 46 of whom received adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy were younger (60.2 vs. 63.8 years; P=0.047), more likely to have adenocarcinoma (91% vs. 85%; P=0.034), had more advanced ypT and ypN classifications (P<0.001), less response to neoadjuvant therapy (P<0.001), and more margin positivity (15% vs. 4%; P=0.007). With propensity score matching analysis, no variables were significantly different between the two matched groups. Median follow-up times for the entire cohort and for case-control analysis were 2.9 and 2.4 years, respectively. There were no significant differences in overall or recurrence-free survival (RFS) between groups in either analysis.

Conclusions

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy following neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery in esophageal cancer is unclear. We found no significant difference in survival based on adjuvant chemotherapy. Future prospective studies should further investigate potential survival benefits and morbidity.

Is 18F-FDG-PET useful for predicting R0 resection after induction therapy for initially unresectable locally advanced esophageal carcinoma?

OBJECTIVE

Induction therapy followed by surgery is a promising strategy for esophageal cancer patients with invasion of the trachea/bronchus or aorta. However, no diagnostic criteria have been established to diagnose whether R0 resection can be performed. We investigated whether ¹⁸F-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸F-FDG-PET) and other modalities are useful for predicting R0 resection.

METHODS

Fifty-seven patients with esophageal cancer invading the trachea/bronchus or aorta who underwent induction therapy followed by surgery were enrolled. We divided the participants into two groups, an R0 resection group (n = 43) and a non-R0 resection group (n = 14), and then compared the between-group results of three modalities, including computed tomography (CT), endoscopy and ¹⁸F-FDG-PET, before and after induction therapy.

RESULTS

The post-maximal standardized uptake value (SUV_max) after induction therapy in the R0 resection group was significantly lower than that in the non-R0 resection group (4.4 vs. 6.6, p = 0.005). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the cut-off value for the post-SUV_max based on ¹⁸F-FDG-PET prediction of R0 resection was 4.7. Furthermore, a tumor reduction rate of ≥44% on CT, no residual stenosis, and no deep ulcer on endoscopy were associated with R0 resection after induction therapy (p = 0.002, p = 0.091, and p = 0.059, respectively). Multivariate logistic analyses revealed that the tumor reduction rate on CT and post-SUV_max <4.7 in ¹⁸F-FDG-PET were independent factors for R0 resection.

CONCLUSIONS

The post-SUV_max determined by ¹⁸F-FDG-PET and the volume reduction rate based on CT scans were useful for predicting R0 resection after induction therapy for initially unresectable locally advanced esophageal carcinoma.

Oesophageal cancer: Which treatment is the easiest to swallow? A review of combined modality treatments for resectable carcinomas

Oesophageal cancer is a relatively uncommon malignancy, but with poor prognosis. Despite several treatment options that are available, the 5-year survival rates rarely exceed 40%. This review discusses the main challenges of oesophageal cancer, the available treatment options, and the most effective treatment in terms of overall survival. The outcomes of clinical trials show that neo-adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy using cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil followed by oesophagectomy results in the greatest survival. However, the optimal chemotherapy and radiotherapy schedule remains unclear. There is no satisfactory treatment to date, particularly for patients with co-morbidities or advanced tumours.

Inter-evaluator heterogeneity of clinical diagnosis for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Identifying clinical resectability of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is important, although inter-evaluator heterogeneity (IEH) could exist, especially in borderline resectable (BLR) cases. To investigate the extent of heterogeneity, we conducted clinical diagnostic imaging questionnaires.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five cases with clinical T3 or T4 cases, which were treated with neo-adjuvant triplet chemotherapy followed by surgery, were selected as the model. These cases were divided into two groups: curative resected cases (#1-#3) and non-curative resected cases (#4 and #5). Only imaging slides were shown without any information about patient characteristics or clinical course. The evaluators consisted of surgeons (staff and non-staff), medical oncologists, and an imaging radiologist; a total of 25 medical staff answered the questionnaire. Two questions (1: clinical T stage before chemotherapy, 2: resectability after chemotherapy) were answered. Occupational differences were assessed by comparing the results to the imaging radiologist.

RESULTS

IEH was observed for clinical diagnosis before chemotherapy in one case (clinical T4: 52%, clinical T3: 48%). In the other cases, most evaluators diagnosed them as clinical T4, with 76-88% agreement. IEH for clinical resectability after chemotherapy was relatively small. Occupational IEH was observed in both before and after chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

IEH in decisions about treating BLR cases in ESCC should be considered in clinical practice. Multi-disciplinary teams are essential to overcome this problem.

A prospective, multicenter phase I/II study of induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil (DCF) followed by chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable locally advanced esophageal carcinoma

Purpose

Standard care for unresectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is concurrent chemoradiotherapy, but survival remains limited. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil (DCF) has demonstrated promising activity, with a pathological complete response (CR) of 17 % for resectable stage II/III ESCC. Here, we conducted a multicenter study to assess the efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy with DCF followed by CRT in patients with unresectable locally advanced ESCC.

Methods

Eligibility criteria included clinical T4 and/or M1 lymph node ESCC, PS 0–1 and age 20–70 years. Treatment consisted of docetaxel 70 mg/m² and cisplatin 70 mg/m² on day 1, and fluorouracil 750 mg/m² on days 1–5, repeated every 3 weeks for three cycles, followed by cisplatin 70 mg/m² on days 64 and 92, and fluorouracil 700 mg/m² on days 64–67 and 92–95, concurrently with radiotherapy (60 Gy in 30 fractions, 5 days/week). Primary endpoint of the phase II part was CR rate.

Results

Thirty-three patients were enrolled. The completion rate of protocol treatment was 88 %. Thirteen patients (39.4 %) achieved a CR. With a median follow-up period of 41 months (range 24–49 months), median progression-free survival was 12.2 months, and median survival was 26.0 months, with a survival rate of 40.4 % at 3 years. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia, leukopenia, anorexia and dysphagia. No treatment-related death was observed.

Conclusion

Induction chemotherapy with DCF followed by CRT is tolerable and shows promising efficacy for unresectable locally advanced ESCC.

Phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, nedaplatin, and S1 for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Although standard chemotherapy for esophageal cancer patients is fluorouracil and cisplatin, the prognosis is still unsatisfactory. A new therapeutic regimen combining docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5‐fluorouracil was recently developed to improve both local and distant tumor control. We developed a new regimen of docetaxel, nedaplatin, and S1 (DGS) and previously reported the recommended dose in a phase I dose‐escalation study. We then undertook a phase II study of DGS for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Patients with clinical stage IB/II/III disease were eligible. Patients received two courses of chemotherapy: docetaxel 35 mg/m² with nedaplatin 40 mg/m² on day 8, 80 mg/m² S1 on days 1–14, and 2 weeks off. After completion of chemotherapy, patients underwent esophagectomy. The primary endpoint was the completion rate of protocol treatment (completion of two courses of preoperative chemotherapy and R0 surgery [no residual tumor]). We enrolled 32 patients. The completion rate of protocol treatment was 96.9%. During chemotherapy, the most common grade 3 or 4 toxicity was neutropenia (25.0%). No treatment‐related deaths were observed, and the incidence of operative morbidity was tolerable. The overall response rate after chemotherapy was 83.3%. This DGS regimen was well tolerated and highly active. This trial is registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN ID: 000014626).

Risk Factors for Esophageal Fistula Associated With Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Unresectable Esophageal Cancer: A Supplementary Analysis of JCOG0303

Esophageal fistula is a critical adverse event in patients treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced esophageal cancer. However, risk factors associated with esophageal fistula formation in patients receiving CRT have not yet been elucidated.We retrospectively analyzed data obtained from 140 patients who were enrolled in a phase II/III trial comparing low-dose cisplatin with standard-dose cisplatin administered in combination with 5-flurouracil and concomitant radiotherapy. Inclusion criteria were performance status (PS) 0 to 2 and histologically proven thoracic esophageal cancer clinically diagnosed as T4 and/or unresectable lymph node metastasis for which definitive CRT was applicable. Risk factors for esophageal fistula were examined with univariate analysis using Fisher exact test and multivariate analysis using logistic regression models.Esophageal fistula was observed in 31 patients (22%). Of these, 6 patients developed fistula during CRT. Median time interval between the date of CRT initiation and that of fistula diagnosis was 100 days (inter quartile range, 45-171). Esophageal stenosis was the only significant risk factor for esophageal fistula formation both in univariate (P = 0.026) and in multivariate analyses (odds ratio, 2.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-5.92, P = 0.025). Other clinicopathological factors, namely treatment arm, age, sex, PS, primary tumor location, T stage, lymph node invasion to adjacent organs, blood cell count, albumin level, and body mass index, were not risk factors fistula formation.Esophageal stenosis was a significant risk factor for esophageal fistula formation in patients treated with CRT for unresectable locally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

AKT expression is associated with degree of pathologic response in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus treated with neoadjuvant therapy

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCRT) has become standard in the treatment of locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) with survival correlated to degree of pathologic response. The phosphatidyl inositol 3 kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT)/mTOR pathway plays an important role in tumorgenesis and resistance. We sought to elucidate the role of this pathway in patients with EAC who received NCRT.

METHODS

After IRB approval, a prospective trial was initiated in which patients with EAC underwent endoscopic biopsies of normal and tumor tissue prior to instituting NCRT. Patients then proceeded to esophagectomy. The pre-treatment tissues underwent gene expression profiling. SAM method was used to analyze expression of AKT within normal and tumor tissue. Expression was then correlated to degree of pathologic response.

RESULTS

One-hundred patients were consented for the study, of which 67 met final eligibility. Nineteen patient's tumors ultimately underwent gene expression profiling via microarray. The differential expression of all AKT isoforms in tumor tissue was markedly overexpressed compared to normal tissue (P=6×10(-5)). There were 3 patients designated as pNR, 6 as pPR, and 10 as pCR. Partial and non-responders had higher expressions of AKT compared to pCR with the non-responders consistently illustrated the highest expression of AKT (P=0.02). There was a significant correlation between individual isoforms of AKT-1, AKT-2, and AKT-3 and degree of pathologic response (P=0.002, 0.04, and 0.04 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

AKT is overexpressed in patients with AC of the esophagus. Moreover, pathologic response to NCRT may be correlated with degree of AKT expression. Additional data is needed to clarify this relationship to potentially add targeted therapies to the neoadjuvant regimen.

Phase II trial of biweekly docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

The prognosis of esophageal cancer patients is still unsatisfactory. Although a docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-Fu (DCF) regimen has been reported, it is often difficult to accomplish because of severe toxicity. Therefore, we developed a new biweekly DCF (Bi-DCF) regimen and previously reported the recommended dose in a phase I dose-escalation study. We then performed a phase II study of Bi-DCF for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Patients with clinical stage II/III were eligible. Patients received 2 courses of chemotherapy: docetaxel 35 mg/m² with cisplatin 40 mg/m² on days 1 and 15 and 400 mg/m² 5-fluorouracil on days 1–5 and 15–19 every 4 weeks. After completion of the chemotherapy, patients received esophagectomy. The primary endpoint was the completion rate of protocol treatment. Thirty-two patients were enrolled. The completion rate of protocol treatment (completion of two courses of preoperative chemotherapy and R0 surgery) was 100 %. During chemotherapy, the most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia (31.3 %). No treatment-related death was observed, and the incidence of operative morbidity was tolerable. The overall response rate after the chemotherapy was 90.3 %. This Bi-DCF regimen was well tolerated and highly active. This trial was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network (No. UMIN 000014625).

Inter-institutional survival heterogeneity in chemoradiation therapy for esophageal cancer: exploratory analysis of the JCOG0303 study

It is important to examine variation in the treatment effects of patients with esophageal cancer in order to generalize treatment outcomes. We aimed to investigate the range of prognostic differences among hospitals in the treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer. The JCOG0303 study compared the efficacy of radiotherapy plus low-dose cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil with that of high-dose cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil for unresectable esophageal cancer. Of 32 institutions participating in the JCOG0303 study, the 18 institutions that enrolled three or more patients were included in this study. We predicted the 1-year survival in each institution by using a mixed-effect model. We found that the predicted 1-year survival in the 18 institutions with three or more patients was a median of 60.9%, with a range of 60.9-60.9%. This study is the first to investigated heterogeneity of survival in patients who received definitive chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Randomized study of low-dose versus standard-dose chemoradiotherapy for unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (JCOG0303)

Low-dose cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (LDPF) chemotherapy with daily radiotherapy (RT) is used as an alternative chemoradiotherapy regimen for locally advanced esophageal carcinoma. We evaluated whether RT plus LDPF chemotherapy had an advantage in terms of survival and/or toxicity over RT plus standard-dose cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (SDPF) chemotherapy in this study. This multicenter trial included esophageal cancer patients with clinical T4 disease and/or unresectable regional lymph node metastasis. Patients were randomly assigned to receive RT (2 Gy/fraction, total dose of 60 Gy) with SDPF (arm A) or LDPF (arm B) chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). A total of 142 patients (arm A/B, 71/71) from 41 institutions were enrolled between April 2004 and September 2009. The OS hazard ratio in arm B versus arm A was 1.05 (80% confidence interval, 0.78-1.41). There were no differences in toxicities in either arm. Arm B was judged as not promising for further evaluation in the phase III setting. Thus, the Data and Safety Monitoring Committee recommended that the study be terminated. In the updated analyses, median OS and 3-year OS were 13.1 months and 25.9%, respectively, for arm A and 14.4 months and 25.7%, respectively, for arm B. Daily RT plus LDPF chemotherapy did not qualify for further evaluation as a new treatment option for patients with locally advanced unresectable esophageal cancer. This study was registered at the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000000861.

Chemoradiotherapy and surgery for T4 esophageal cancer in Japan

Esophageal cancer is thought to be the most malignant neoplasm due to its biological aggressiveness. The most effective treatment modality for esophageal cancer, particularly T4 esophageal cancer, is chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Some T4 patients show long-term survival after receiving CRT, suggesting that even T4 esophageal cancer can be cured with this modality. Although surgery is performed after CRT in some T4 cases, its prognostic benefit is controversial. In this paper, we review the status of CRT and conversion surgery as well as the development of new regimens and discuss the future prospects of CRT in the treatment of T4 esophageal cancer in Japan.

A history of surgery for locally-advanced (T4) cancer of the thoracic esophagus in Japan and a personal perspective

The history of esophageal surgery in Japan can be divided into three periods, an era of safety from 1930 to 1980, an era of radicality from 1980 to 2000, and the era of quality of life (QOL) from 2000 to the present. The treatment for T4 cancers of the thoracic esophagus has also changed over time from preoperative radiotherapy, combined resection of the neighboring organs with esophagectomy, and to definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) with salvage surgery. At present, almost all patients with an unresectable T4 esophageal cancer receives dCRT. However, there are many patients with a residual or recurrent tumor after dCRT. Salvage surgery for such patients often results in incomplete resection of the tumor because the tumor involves the trachea and/or aorta. New techniques to enable the resection of such neighboring organs even during salvage surgery are needed. In the future, the mainstay of treatment for esophageal cancer will be CRT with the foreseeable progress in new drugs and new techniques of radiotherapy. Surgery will be indicated for a local failure after CRT, while combined resection of the neighboring organs will be necessary to treat a local failure after CRT for T4 cancers. New surgical techniques have to be developed through some application of new devices and equipment.

Outcomes associated with surgery for T4 esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

T4 esophageal cancer often portends a dismal prognosis even after surgical resection. Historical incomplete resections and poor survival rates often make surgery palliative rather than curative.

METHODS

Using a comprehensive esophageal cancer database, we identified patients who underwent an esophagectomy for T4 tumors between 1994 and 2011. Neoadjuvant treatment (NT) and pathologic response variables were recorded, and response was denoted as complete response (pCR), partial response (pPR), and nonresponse (NR). Clinical and pathologic data were compared. Survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests for significance.

RESULTS

We identified 45 patients with T4 tumors all who underwent NT. The median age was 60 years (range, 31-79 years) with a median follow-up of 27 months (range, 0-122 months). There were 19 pCR (42 %), 22 pPR (49 %), and 4 NR (9 %). R0 resections were accomplished in 43 (96 %). There were 18 recurrences (40 %) with a median time to recurrence of 13.5 months (2.2-71 months). In this group pCR represented 7 (38.9 %), whereas pPR and NR represented 10 (55.5 %), and 1 (5.5 %) respectively. The overall and disease-free survival for all patients with T4 tumors were 35 and 36 %, respectively. Patients achieving a pCR had a 5 year overall and disease-free survival of 53 and 54 %, compared with pPR 23 and 28 %, while there were no 5 year survivors in the NR cohort.

CONCLUSION

We have demonstrated that neoadjuvant therapy and downstaging of T4 tumors leads to increased R0 resections and improvements in overall and disease-free survival.

Management of advanced-stage operable esophageal cancer

The incidence of esophageal cancer is increasing in the developed world, with a relative increase in adenocarcinoma compared with squamous cell carcinoma. The distensible nature of the esophagus results in delayed development of symptoms associated with esophageal cancer; hence many patients have locally advanced or metastatic cancer at the time of initial presentation. Although resection remains the treatment of choice for early-stage esophageal cancer, the best treatment strategy for locally advanced esophageal cancer is debatable and, consequently, varies at different centers. This article discusses the published literature on various available therapeutic options for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Comparison Between Concurrent Chemoradiation Followed by Surgery vs. Surgery for Locally Advanced Cancer of Esophagus

Surgery is an accepted standard in the treatment of localized stage cancer of esophagus. But the ideal approach for locally advanced lesions still remains unknown. Patients with locally advanced lesions (cT3-4N1M0) on the basis of CT chest were subjected either to primary surgery or to preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgery. Major postoperative complications (mortality, anastomotic leak and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy) did not differ in either arm (P = not significant). Complete pathological response was achieved in 31.2% cases in multimodality arm. Four year overall survival was 10% for whole group. Median survival was 14 months and 20 months in surgery and multimodality arm, respectively (p = .288). In multimodal arm, there was significant survival difference between complete responders and nonresponders (p = .02). For locally advanced lesions, surgery alone gives poor outcome and preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgery should be considered for complete responders.

Clinical relevance of induction triplet chemotherapy for esophageal cancer invading adjacent organs

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There is no consensus on treatment for esophageal cancer invading adjacent organs (T4), but induction multidrug chemotherapy may be a beneficial, especially when surgery is considered as adjuvant treatment.

METHODS

We classified 169 patients with T4 esophageal cancer without distant metastasis into those undergoing chemotherapy using cisplatin and 5-FU (CF) plus adriamycin or CF plus docetaxel (79 patients) and those undergoing chemoradiotherapy using CF (90 patients). For the former group, chemoradiation was subsequently applied when surgical resection was not indicated.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients in the chemotherapy group (43.0%) received chemoradiotherapy following chemotherapy. Although the response rate tended to be higher in the chemoradiotherapy group, there was no significant difference in the response rate between the groups (63.3% vs. 68.9%). Esophageal perforation during treatment was more frequent among the chemoradiotherapy group than the chemotherapy group (16.7% vs. 6.3%, P=0.0379). The rate of surgical resection was consequently higher for the induction chemotherapy group compared to the chemoradiotherapy group (72.1% vs. 45.6%, P=0.0005).

CONCLUSIONS

Induction triplet chemotherapy reduced esophageal perforation and increased the resectability of T4 esophageal cancers by combining second-line chemoradiotherapy. This strategy might increase the chance of curative resection for patients with T4 esophageal cancer.

Treatment of T4 esophageal cancer. Definitive chemo-radiotherapy vs chemo-radiotherapy followed by surgery

The outcome of patients with T4 esophageal cancer, defined as a tumor that invades neighboring structures (e.g., aorta, trachea, bronchus, and lung), is extremely poor. Despite recent advances in surgical techniques, these tumors are usually considered inoperable. Two distinct therapeutic options are currently available for T4 esophageal cancers: chemo-radiotherapy followed by surgery (CRT-S), which comprises esophagectomy following down-staging of the tumor by CRT, and definitive chemo-radiotherapy (D-CRT), which is designed to avoid esophagectomy by using maximum doses of irradiation. CRT-S is superior to D-CRT with respect to local control and short-term survival although CRT-S is associated with relatively higher perioperative mortality and morbidity. On the other hand, it is sometimes difficult to achieve local control with D-CRT and the treatment often results in fistula formation, though a complete response to CRT is often associated with better prognosis. Admittedly, the difference in the survival rate between the two modalities is marginal at long-term follow-up due to operative morbidity and inadequate control of distant metastasis in CRT-S. Changes in perioperative management and intensive systemic chemotherapy may enhance the outcome. Randomized controlled trials involving large population samples are needed to define the standard treatment for T4 esophageal cancer.

Multicenter phase I/II study of docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus

OBJECTIVE

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is refractory to current therapeutic regimens and more effective therapies are imperative. To this end, we conducted a multicenter phase I/II trial of docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (DCF) combination chemotherapy for ESCC.

METHODS

The study subjects were 46 patients with advanced or recurrent ESCC. Treatment included docetaxel at 60, 70, and 75 mg/m(2), cisplatin at 70 mg/m(2) on day 1, and daily fluorouracil at 700 mg/m(2) on days 1 through 5. The recommended dose of docetaxel was determined in phase I, while the response rate (RR) and progression-free survival rates were analyzed in phase II.

RESULTS

The recommended dose was determined to be 70 mg/m(2) in phase I. In phase II, the RR was 72.5%. Interim analysis showed median and 1-year progression-free survival of 14 months and 55.6%, respectively. Grade 3/4 toxicities of leukopenia and neutropenia occurred in 72.5 and 90% of patients, respectively. No treatment-related death was recorded. Surgical resection was subsequently performed in 20 patients after chemotherapy, and curative resection was achieved in 19.

CONCLUSION

DCF was tolerable and effective for advanced and recurrent ESCC. Such findings might encourage a change in the treatment strategy for ESCC.

Risk factors and clinical courses of chemoradiation-related arterio-esophageal fistula in esophageal cancer patients with clinical invasion of the aorta

BACKGROUND

Although concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is a standard treatment for esophageal cancer invading adjacent structures (T4-EC), arterio-esophageal fistula (AEF) occurs occasionally as a critical adverse event of T4-EC with CRT. The frequency, clinical course, and risk factors of AEF related to CRT are not well known.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 48 patients with T4-EC invasion of the aorta who were treated with 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and concurrent radiotherapy at our institution between September 2002 and April 2009. Treatment-related AEF was defined as AEF without obvious tumor progression. We evaluated the frequency, clinical courses, and risk factors of AEF.

RESULTS

The median survival time was 10.6 months with a median follow-up time of 33.3 months. The 2-year survival rate was 25%. Treatment-related AEF was observed in 7 patients (14.6%) and 4 of them died of massive bleeding due to aortic AEF. In the other 3 patients with non-aortic AEF, hemorrhage could be arrested by transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE). In the univariate analysis of risk factors for AEF, lower serum cholesterol level was a risk factor for AEF (OR 14.7; 95% CI 1.58-137; P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Although CRT has a curative potential even for patients with T4-EC invading the aorta, we should be aware of the relatively high incidence of treatment-related AEF. TAE may be successful in rescuing a non-aortic AEF patient. Low serum cholesterol level may be a risk factor for AEF, but further investigation is needed.

[Preoperative chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal cancer]

Preoperative or definitive chemoradiotherapy defines today the standard treatment of patients with localized or locally advanced esophageal cancer. Preliminary results of our study are presented. 46 patients with locally advanced squamous cell esophageal cancer (T3-4, N0-1, M0) were enrolled. All patients recieved concomitant chemotherapy (Cisplatin/5FU/LV) and radiotherapy (45-50, 4Gy). Clinical response rate was 59% (3 patients (7%) complete response, 24 patients (52%) partial regression, 13 (28%) stabile disease, 6 patients (13%) disease progression). Out of 46 patients, 12 were operated (26%), all with R0 resection. Complete patohistolgical regression (TRG 1) was noted in 5 patients (42%). TRG 2 i TRG 3 in one (8%) and 3 patients (25%), and TRG 4 in 3 patients (25%). Mean survival time in operated group of patients was 9.3 months, and in nonoperated group 5.5 months. Studies show improved survival rate in patients with complete response to chemoradiotherapy and R0 resection. Individualy tailored therapy is essential.

Treatment of thoracic esophageal carcinoma invading adjacent structures

T4 esophageal cancer is defined as the tumor invading adjacent structures, using tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging. For clinically T4 thoracic esophageal carcinoma, multimodality therapy, that is, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery or definitive CRT, has generally been performed. However, the prognosis of patients with these tumors remains poor. Another strategy is needed to achieve curative treatment. In the present article, the treatment strategies employed to date are reviewed. Furthermore, the strategies for these malignancies are reassessed, based on our experiences. R1/2 and R0 resections are regarded as those with residual and no tumor after surgery. The present data show that patients who underwent R1/2 resection after neoadjuvant CRT experienced little survival benefit, while complete response (CR) cases after definitive CRT had comparatively better results. Therefore, curative surgery should not be attempted without down-staging, and definitive CRT should be the initial treatment. Then surgery is indicated for the eradication of residual cancer cells. Close surveillance is essential for early detection of relapse even after CR, because the operation will gradually become increasingly difficult due to post-CRT fibrosis. In conclusion, multimodality therapy consists of definitive CRT followed by R0 resection, which can be the treatment of choice for T4 esophageal carcinoma. These challenging treatments have the potential to constitute the most effective therapeutic strategy.

REG I expression predicts long-term survival among locally advanced thoracic squamous cell esophageal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

The prognosis for patients with locally advanced thoracic esophageal cancer is extremely unfavorable. We have been administering neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by esophagectomy to these patients and studying whether REG I expression in untreated endoscopic biopsy specimens is predictive of patient responsiveness to CRT and/or survival after treatment.

METHODS

Between 1992 and 2003, 47 patients with T4 (direct invasion of adjacent organs) thoracic esophageal cancers were administered neoadjuvant CRT followed by esophagectomy. REG I expression was assessed in untreated endoscopic biopsy specimens and correlated with clinical and histological responses and survival in 37 patients who had also undergone curative surgery.

RESULTS

Among the 37 cases that received CRT followed by surgery, the therapeutic response rate for neoadjuvant CRT was 68%, and a complete histological response in resected specimens from the primary lesion was achieved in 8 (22%) patients. These clinical and histological responses to neoadjuvant CRT did not significantly correlate with survival, however. By contrast, 9 patients were judged REG-positive based on analysis of their untreated endoscopic biopsy specimens, and their cumulative survival rate was significantly higher than that of the 28 REG-negative patients (P = 0.0073). Univariate analysis showed REG I expression to be a prognostic factor (P = 0.0386) that increased the risk of death 8.4-fold.

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluation of REG I expression in untreated endoscopic biopsy specimens may provide a basis for new treatments of locally advanced thoracic squamous cell esophageal cancers.

Evaluation of an aortic stent graft for use in surgery on esophageal cancer involving the thoracic aorta

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this experimental study was to investigate whether aortic stent grafting can be applied to the treatment of an esophageal cancer involving the thoracic aorta.

METHODS

The canine thoracic aorta was partially resected without aorta being clamped after emplacement of an endovascular stent graft. Study I; The aortic whole layer of 1 cm in length and 1/4 of the circumference was resected and was covered by a free fascia patch of the abdominal rectal muscle immediately after stent graft placement. Study II; The aortic adventitia and the outer half of the media of the same size was resected on day 3, 7, 14, 21, and on day 28, after the stent graft placement. The resected portion was covered by the free fascia patch in half experimental dogs, and was uncovered in the others. Study III; The aortic adventitia and the outer half of the media of 1 cm in length and 1/2 of the circumference was resected and was uncovered on day 7 after stent graft placement. Histological examinations were performed on day 28 and at one year after aortic resection.

RESULTS

The aortic wall could be resected in all cases with no complication, except in resection of 1/2 the circumference where the aorta had become narrow. There was no difference in healing of the resected portion of the aorta between with and without fascia covering.

CONCLUSION

An aortic endovascular stent graft could be applied to surgery for an esophageal cancer involving the aorta.

Cell-cycle regulators and the Ki-67 labeling index can predict the response to chemoradiotherapy and the survival of patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus

BACKGROUND

We investigated whether aberrant p53 and p16 expression, the Ki-67 labeling index (LI), and int-2/cyclin D1 gene amplification predict the response to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

p53 and p16 expression status, the Ki-67 LI, and int-2/cyclin D1 amplification were assessed by immunohistochemical staining and slot blot analysis in pretreatment endoscopic biopsy specimens of 41 patients with T4 or M1 Lym (distant lymph node metastasis) ESCC. All patients received a course of chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil and cisplatin) with radiotherapy.

RESULTS

The CRT therapeutic response rate was 71%, and resection after CRT was successful in 15 of the cases in which the CRT effect was significant. The cumulative survival rate after CRT in the p53-negative patients was significantly higher than in the p53-positive patients (P =.037). The mean Ki-67 LI in the CRT response cases was significantly higher than in the CRT no-response cases (P =.023). Multivariate regression analysis revealed high Ki-67 LI to be an independent variable linked to a pathologic complete response to CRT (P =.033). The cumulative survival rate after CRT in the group that was p53-negative and int-2/cyclin D1 amplification-positive was significantly higher than in the other groups (P =.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluating predictive factors in pretreatment endoscopic biopsy specimens may allow selection of more suitable multimodal treatment for ESCC patients and improve their quality of life.