Salvage or planned esophagectomy after chemoradiation therapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer--a review

International Expert Consensus on Semantics of Multimodal Esophageal Cancer Treatment: Delphi Study

BACKGROUND

Recent developments in esophageal cancer treatment, including studies exploring active surveillance following chemoradiotherapy, have led to a need for clear terminology and definitions regarding different multimodal treatment options.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to reach worldwide consensus on the definitions and semantics of multimodal esophageal cancer treatment.

METHODS

In total, 72 experts working in the field of multimodal esophageal cancer treatment were invited to participate in this Delphi study. The study comprised three Delphi surveys sent out by email and one online meeting. Input for the Delphi survey consisted of terminology obtained from a systematic literature search. Participants were asked to respond to open questions and to indicate whether they agreed or disagreed with different statements. Consensus was reached when there was ≥75% agreement among respondents.

RESULTS

Forty-nine of 72 invited experts (68.1%) participated in the first online Delphi survey, 45 (62.5%) in the second survey, 21 (46.7%) of 45 in the online meeting, and 39 (86.7%) of 45 in the final survey. Consensus on neoadjuvant and definitive chemoradiotherapy with or without surgery was reached for 27 of 31 items (87%). No consensus was reached on follow-up after treatment with definitive chemoradiotherapy.

CONCLUSION(S)

Consensus was reached on most statements regarding terminology and definitions of multimodal esophageal cancer treatment. Implementing uniform criteria facilitates comparison of studies and promotes international research collaborations.

Salvage Esophagectomy After Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Squamous Cell Esophageal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study in a High-Volume Center

BACKGROUND

Salvage esophagectomy, indicated for some patients with locally recurrent/persistent disease after definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT), reportedly has high postoperative complications. This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of dCRT followed by salvage esophagectomy (DCRE) with planned esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRE) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all locally advanced ESCC patients treated with DCRE or NCRE at Shanghai Chest Hospital from 2018 to 2021. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline differences. DCRE is defined as esophagectomy for recurrent/persistent disease after dCRT.

RESULTS

A total of 302 patients (41 for DCRE and 261 for NCRE) were included. The median interval of chemoradiotherapy-to-surgery was 47d in NCRE, 43d and 440d in DCRE of persistent disease (n = 24) and recurrence (n = 17), respectively. DCRE was observed with advanced ypT stage (63% vs 38%), poorer differentiation (32% vs 15%) and more lymphovascular invasion (29% vs 11%) compared with NCRE (all p < 0.05). The above factors were comparable between the two groups after PSM (all p > 0.05). There were no significant differences before and after PSM in postoperative complications over Clavien-Dindo grade III (e.g., respiratory failure and anastomotic leak), 30/90-day postoperative mortality, and survival.

CONCLUSION

Through a standardized surgical procedure in a high-volume center, DCRE exhibited comparable postoperative complications and prognosis with NCRE.

Feasibility of conversion thoracoscopic esophagectomy after induction therapy for locally advanced unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Recently, patients with cT4b esophageal cancer often require conversion surgery following induction therapy, for which the standard procedure is open esophagectomy. However, thoracoscopic esophagectomy, including thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position, is increasingly used. We compared short-term outcomes of thoracoscopic esophagectomy and open esophagectomy in this setting.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 14 patients who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy, and 10 who underwent open esophagectomy, for locally advanced unresectable esophageal cancer after induction therapy between March 2007 and July 2020.

RESULTS

The two groups did not significantly differ in patient background. Median total and thoracic surgical times were both significantly longer for open esophagectomy than for thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Median blood loss was also greater in the open esophagectomy group than in the thoracoscopic esophagectomy group. The thoracoscopic esophagectomy group also had significantly shorter median chest drain duration; and lower C-reactive protein levels on the second and third postoperative days. The two groups did not significantly differ in total complications or postoperative hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracoscopic esophagectomy is as safe and feasible as open esophagectomy for conversion surgery after induction therapy for locally advanced unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Safety of thoracoscopic esophagectomy after induction chemotherapy for locally advanced unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Recent studies have reported that induction chemotherapy with docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) is an effective treatment for unresectable, locally advanced esophageal cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and feasibility of thoracoscopic esophagectomy (TE) after DCF for initially unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

Twenty-three patients with initially unresectable T4 thoracic ESCC underwent TE after induction DCF.

RESULTS

The neighboring organs with tumors were the tracheobronchus in nine patients, thoracic aorta in 13, and pericardium and diaphragm in three each (concurrent overlapping invasion occurred in five patients). The mean total operation time was 556.3 ± 107.2 minutes, and the mean time of the thoracic procedure was 258.9 ± 83.9 minutes. The mean total blood loss was 166.2 ± 117.8 mL, and the loss during the thoracic procedure was 33.5 ± 24.6 mL. All patients achieved complete R0 resection under TE. No conversions to open thoracotomy were performed. The postoperative morbidity rate was 34.8%. The postoperative hospital stay was 24.3 (range, 13-38) days. Five patients had recurrence: four had distant metastasis (lung, two; liver, three; and one with overlap), and one had mediastinal lymph node recurrence. No local recurrence was noted at the site of the primary T4 tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

TE was safely performed in 23 patients after DCF therapy for locally advanced unresectable ESCC. Induction DCF, followed by TE, could be an alternative treatment for unresectable T4 ESCC.

Investigation of operative outcomes of thoracoscopic esophagectomy after triplet chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Preoperative chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CF) has become the standard treatment for resectable stage II/III thoracic esophageal carcinoma in Japan. Recently, preoperative triplet chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) has been reported to be effective for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy (TE) has been increasingly accepted worldwide for the treatment of esophageal cancer. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the safety and outcomes of TE after DCF therapy for patients with advanced esophageal cancer.

METHODS

The medical records of 63 consecutive patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent thoracoscopic surgery after chemotherapy were reviewed. Thirty-four patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with CF, and 29 received DCF as first-line chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The clinical T stage was significantly higher in the DCF group than in the CF group (p < 0.0001), including 17 patients with T4. Lymph node metastasis was more frequent in the DCF group (p = 0.0005), and the clinical stage of the tumor was significantly higher in the DCF group than in the CF group (p = 0.0001). No significant difference existed between the two groups in operation time for the thoracic procedure (DCF 277.2 min vs. CF 302 min). Blood loss during the thoracic procedure was less in the DCF group than in the CF group (DCF 46.9 mL vs. CF 88.8 mL; p = 0.0056). No significant differences existed between the two groups in postoperative morbidity (DCF 34.5% vs. CF 47%) or mortality (DCF 0% vs. CF 2.9%) rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that TE after DCF therapy for advanced esophageal cancer is as safe as TE after CF therapy.

Salvage pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy following definitive chemoradiotherapy

Historically, total pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy has been the standard radical surgical treatment for synchronous cancer of the thoracoabdominal esophagus and pharyngolaryngeal region, and for cancer of the cervical esophagus that has invaded as far as the thoracic esophagus. Although definitive chemoradiotherapy that enables preservation of the larynx has often been the first choice of treatment for cancers involving the cervical esophagus, total pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy is required as a salvage therapy for cases involving failure of complete remission or locoregional recurrence after chemoradiotherapy. However, salvage esophageal surgery after definitive high-dose chemoradiotherapy is generally associated with high morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to examine the short-term outcome of salvage total pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy. From 2001 to 2014, nine patients underwent salvage total pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy at the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya University. The mortality and morbidity rates were high at 22% and 89%, respectively. Four patients (44%) developed tracheal necrosis, which in two patients eventually led to lethal hemorrhage. Salvage total pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy is an uncommon and highly demanding surgical procedure that should be carefully planned and conducted in selected centers of excellence. Measures must be taken to preserve the tracheal blood supply, thus avoiding fatal complications.

Complications of the rescue esophagectomy in advanced esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Even though the esophageal cancer has innumerous treatment options its prognosis is still unsettled. Because esophagectomy is rarely curative, new and emerging therapies come to light such as isolated chemotherapy and radiotherapy or combined chemoradiation, followed or not by surgery. The rescue esophagectomy is an alternative for those patients with recurrent or advanced disease.

AIM

To evaluate the results of the rescue esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer who had previously undergone chemoradiation and describe local and systemic complications of the procedure.

METHODS

Eighteen patients with unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were treated with chemoradiation followed by rescue esophagectomy. All of them presented the preoperative clinical conditions required to indicate the surgical procedure. Transthoracic esophagectomy with right side thoracotomy plus midline laparotomy was performed. Patients were evaluated with regard to any postoperative complications.

RESULTS

There were five patients with evidence of fistula at the level of the anastomosis, and four of them progressed satisfactorily. Postoperative dilation was needed in five out of eighteen patients due to stenosis of the esophagogastric suture line. Seven patients did develop pulmonary infection with a fatal outcome for two of them. Among the patients who were available for a five-year follow-up, there was a rate of 53.8% of disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

These patients presented an elevated morbidity of the procedure related to many factors such as the long period between chemoradiation and surgery, which leads to tissue injury resulting in anastomotic fistulas. Nevertheless, esophagectomy seems to be valuable in cases without any other therapeutic option.

Salvage esophagectomy

Patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer are treated with definitive chemoradiation (dCXRT) for a number of reasons. Some patients are never referred to a surgeon for a con-versation about surgery, others decline surgery, and some are not candidates for surgery due to a sag in performance status secondary to therapy. Regardless of method of arrival at dCXRT, the risk of local/regional recurrence during follow-up is significant. Many of these patients are faced with limited options for therapy once dCXRT has failed. Salvage esoph-agectomy has historically been considered a morbid procedure and poor choice for lo-cal/regional recurrence. This chapter reviews the recent literature arguing the relevance of salvage resection. We recommend that any patient suffering from persistent or recurrent lo-cal/regional only disease after dCXRT should be referred to an experienced esophageal center to consider surgical options.

Demographic and histological predictors of survival in patients with gastric and esophageal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the possible influence of demographic and histological risk factors on the survival of patients with esophageal and gastric cancer.

OBJECTIVES

Based on the available registry and follow-up information, this study compares 1-5 year survival rate of gastric and esophageal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Through a concurrent (prospective) cohort study, all 366 patients with definite diagnosis of esophageal and gastric cancer who had been hospitalized at the Towhid Hospital, Sanandaj city, Kurdistan province, western Iran during a five-year period from 2006 onwards were recruited. The survival time of patients stratified by this grouping method were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression.

RESULTS

Amongst the 366 patients, 23 had esophageal adenocarcinoma, 94 esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma and 239 had gastric adenocarcinoma. Age at diagnosis (P = < 0.001), tumor grade (P = 0.008) and practice treatment (P = < 0.001) had significant associations with the variation of survival rates in patients with esophageal but not with gastric cancer. The five-year survival rates (by year) for esophageal cancer were 49%, 27%, 24%, 22% and 19%, respectively and for gastric cancer were 41%, 17%, 13%, 10% and 5.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Major differences between these cancers were seen in the survival rates of patients and their incidence classified by sex. Age at diagnosis and histological types were prognostic factors for survival of patients with esophageal cancer but this wasn't the case for gastric cancer.

Quantitative measurement of contrast enhancement of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma on clinical MDCT

AIM

To investigate contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) for discriminating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) from normal esophagus and evaluating outcomes within tumors after chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

METHODS

Sixty-four patients with surgical ESCC served as group A, and underwent thoracic contrast-enhanced scan with 16-section multidetector row CT 1 wk before surgery. Thirty-five patients with advanced ESCC receiving 4-wk CRT and showing response to CRT served as group B, and underwent CT scans similar with group A 4 wk after completion of CRT. In group A, differences in CT attenuation values (in HU) between the preoperative ESCC and background normal esophageal wall (delta CT(1)), or between different background normal esophageal walls (delta CT(2)) were compared. Furthermore, delta CT(1) between group A and B was also compared.

RESULTS

In group A, mean delta CT(1) was higher than delta CT(2) (23.86 ± 10.59 HU vs 6.24 ± 3.06 HU, P < 0.05). When a delta CT(1) of 10.025 HU was employed at a cut-off value to discriminate ESCC from normal esophagus, a sensitivity of 89.1% and specificity of 90.6% were achieved. Mean delta CT(1) was lower in group B than in group A (9.25 ± 10.86 vs 23.86 ± 10.59, P < 0.05), and a delta CT(1) of 15.45 HU was obtained at a cut-off value to assess the CRT changes with a sensitivity of 76.6% and specificity of 77.1%.

CONCLUSION

CECT might be a clinical technique for discriminating ESCC from normal esophagus, and evaluating outcome in the tumors treated with CRT.

Various doses of fractioned irradiation modulates multidrug resistance 1 expression differently through hypoxia-inducible factor 1α in esophageal cancer cells

To evaluate the effect of different regimen of radiotherapy on multidrug resistance 1 (MDR1) expression and analyze the role hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF1α) played in the whole process. Fifty-four cell lines established from 96 esophageal cancer biopsy samples were given various doses of fractioned irradiation. The mRNA and protein levels of HIF1α and MDR1 post-irradiation were measured by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and Western blot analysis, respectively. HIF1α-siRNA was used to verify the effect of HIF1α on radiation-mediated MDR1 modulation. In esophageal cancer cells surviving 28 Gy irradiation (2 Gy/f, 14 fractions), MDR1 mRNA expression increased 65.27 ± 5.58%, and HIF1α was elevated by 27.21 ± 2.25%. Interestingly, their expression decreased by 54.38 ± 11.53% and 32.08 ± 4.75% after 7 Gy irradiation (0.5 Gy/f, 14 fractions). HIF1α expression showed a positive correlation with MDR1 expression in the whole process (P < 0.05). Silencing of HIF1α decreased MDR1 expression and blocked changes in MDR1 and HIF1α expression induced by fractioned irradiation. These results indicate that MDR1 is differentially modulated by different doses of fractionated radiation, which should be taken into account when combining radiotherapy and chemotherapy for patients with esophageal cancer.

Surgery within multimodal therapy concepts for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): the MRI approach and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Radical esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy remains the only curative therapy for patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC), however, combined treatment modalities may improve survival. Based upon more than 1300 consecutive esophageal resections, we present our current multidisciplinary ESCC approach with analysis in the context of recently published RCTs.

METHODS

Subject to tumor staging, patients with resectable ESCC receive either a neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (uT3N+) or are referred to primary surgery (uT1/2N0). By Medline searches (1997-2009), all published RCTs containing multimodal ESCC therapy concepts were identified and a systematic review was generated.

RESULTS

From July 2007 to June 2009, 62 patients with ESCC were treated in our department (40 multimodal treatment concept, 21 primary surgery, 1 definite radiochemotherapy). The R0 resection rate was 78%, in hospital mortality 4.8%. 60% of patients showed a good response to neoadjuvant treatment. 18-month follow-up data revealed absence of tumor recurrence in 7 patients (18%). Our approach is aligned to the current published literature including 12 studies in this review. In line with our institutional experience, neodjuvant radiochemotherapy tends to improve overall survival and increases the likelihood of R0 resection. However, postoperative morbidity and mortality rates are increased. Adjuvant treatment failed to demonstrate any improvement in prognosis. For palliation, concurrent radiochemotherapy is the treatment of choice.

CONCLUSION

The MRI approach can be aligned to the most recent published data. Surgical resection remains the principle treatment for patients with resectable ESCC. Although multimodal therapy concepts tend to improve survival rates, postoperative morbidity and mortality rates are increased.

Optimal timing of endoscopic evaluation of the primary site of esophageal cancer after chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Although use of gastrointestinal endoscopy for response evaluation in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy (CRT/RT) treatment is widely accepted, optimal timing for evaluation has not been sufficiently investigated. Here, we investigated optimal timing of primary site response evaluation in esophageal cancer patients treated with CRT/RT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study examined esophageal cancer patients who underwent CRT/RT between September 2002 and December 2004. Time to complete response (CR) at the primary site was assessed in patients designated as CR at the primary site, while progression-free survival at the primary site (PFSp) was assessed in patients designated as incomplete response at the primary site.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients were enrolled in this study. Median total RT dose was 60 Gy (range, 50-60 Gy), and median RT duration was 53 days (range, 35-74 days). Mean time to CR at the primary site was 97 days (range, 52-201 days). In four patients, although initial examination of biopsy specimens found evidence of viable cancer cells within 75 days of treatment initiation, subsequent examination found no such evidence, and the patients were thus designated as CR. Median PFSp was 149 days (range, 67-399 days), and PFSp rate at 90 days was 97%. Median interval between the previous examination and initial primary progressive disease was 37 days.

CONCLUSION

Recommended time of first response evaluation for esophageal cancer following initiation of CRT/RT was found to be between 75 and 90 days. Subsequent evaluation should be carried out approximately one month following non-CR/non-progressive disease declassification.

Fatal vascular injury as a result of operations: experience of two surgery-related autopsies

We experienced two autopsy cases of unexpected death during surgical operation. Case 1 was a 60-year-old male. Salvage esophagectomy was performed from the right side of the thrax. After dissection of the lymph node, blood pressure decreased suddenly. Emergency thoracotomy was done for diffuse hemothorax in the left thoracic cavity. The patient died despite aggressive hemostasis. Autopsy findings revealed that the operator dissected the left subclavian artery instead of the lymph nodes. Case 2 was a 60-year-old male with advanced thyroid cancer with pelvic metastasis. Surgical removal of the sacrum was attempted for pain relief. The operation was interrupted because of massive hemorrhage from the iliac veins. After the operation, the patient's left leg quickly became necrotic. Despite the bypass grafting from the right to the left femoral artery, the patient died of reperfusion injury. Autopsy revealed ligation of the left common iliac artery along with the accompanying vein. The leg necrosis was thought to have resulted from the vascular ligation. In these two cases, the demonstration and elucidation of the causes of deaths were required with medicolegal autopsies. However, it proved difficult to visualize the operated vessels in detail. In autopsy investigations related to surgical operations, detailed information of the clinical course is valuable and should be provided by the operators themselves, as well as being obtained from clinical charts.

Salvage esophagectomy after exclusive chemoradiotherapy: results at the Brazilian National Cancer Institute (INCA)

Surgical resection is considered the gold standard treatment for esophageal cancer, with global cure rates ranging from 15 to 40%. Exclusive chemoradiotherapy has been used for patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma or without clinical conditions for esophagectomy, reaching a 5-year survival rate of up to 30%. However, locoregional control is poor, with local recurrence of 40-60%, being reported in the literature. Maybe, these patients can benefit from salvage surgery. In this study, 15 patients with esophageal cancer submitted to salvage esophagectomy after exclusive chemoradiotherapy treatment were retrospectively analyzed. Salvage esophagectomy was demonstrated to be technically feasible. However, it presents with high surgical morbidity. Currently, salvage esophagectomy is considered the best available treatment to attempt cure in cases of tumor recurrence or persistence after exclusive chemoradiotherapy. All the other types of treatments are regarded as palliative with discouraging survival results.

Role of salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy

Chemoradiotherapy has become a popular definitive therapy among many patients and oncologists for potentially resectable esophageal carcinoma. Although the complete response rates are high and short-term survival is favorable after chemoradiotherapy, persistent or recurrent locoregional disease is quite frequent. Salvage surgery is the sole curative intent treatment option for this course. As experience with definitive chemoradiotherapy grows, the number of salvage surgeries may increase. Selected articles about salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma are reviewed. The number of salvage surgeries was significantly lower than the number of expected candidates. To identify candidates for salvage surgery, patients undergoing definitive chemoradiotherapy should be followed up carefully. Salvage esophagectomy is difficult when dissecting fibrotic masses from irradiated tissues. Patients who underwent salvage esophagectomy had increased morbidity and mortality. Pulmonary complications such as pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome were common. The anastomotic leak rate was significantly increased because of the effects of the radiation administered to the tissues used as conduits. The most significant factor associated with long-term survival appeared to be complete resection. However, precise evaluation of resectability before operation was difficult. Nevertheless, increased morbidity and mortality will be acceptable in exchange for potential long-term survival after salvage esophagectomy. Such treatment should be considered for carefully selected patients at specialized centers.

Salvage esophagectomy after high-dose chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Chemoradiotherapy is a popular definitive therapy for esophageal carcinoma among many patients and oncologists. Although the complete response rates are high and short-term survival is favorable after chemoradiotherapy, persistent or recurrent locoregional disease is frequent. Salvage surgery is the sole curative intent treatment option for this course of the disease. The present study evaluates the safety and value of salvage esophagectomy for locoregional failure after high-dose definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

We reviewed 59 consecutive patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy. All patients received more than 60 Gy of radiation plus concurrent chemotherapy for curative intent. The data were compared with those of patients who received esophagectomy without preoperative therapy.

RESULTS

Postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were increased among patients who underwent salvage esophagectomy compared with those who underwent esophagectomy without preoperative therapy (mean hospital stay, 38 vs 33 days; anastomotic leak rates, 31% vs 25%; respiratory complication rates, 31% vs 20%; reintubation within 1 week, 2% vs 2%; hospital mortality rates, 8% vs 2%). Tracheobronchial necrosis and gastric conduit necrosis were highly lethal complications after salvage esophagectomy; 3-year postoperative survivals were 38% and 58%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patients who underwent salvage esophagectomy after definitive high-dose chemoradiotherapy had increased morbidity and mortality. Nevertheless, this is acceptable in view of the potential long-term survival after salvage esophagectomy. Such treatment should be considered for carefully selected patients at specialized centers.

Clinical outcome of esophageal cancer after distal gastrectomy: a prospective study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and surgical outcome of thoracic esophageal cancer after gastrectomy, and compare with those without gastrectomy.

RESULT

Among 1411 esophageal cancer patients who underwent curative operation, 48 (3.4%) had a history of distal gastrectomy, the interval between gastrectomy and esophagectomy was significantly shorter in those gastrectomized for gastric cancer (11.5+/-8.2 years) than for peptic ulcer (24.6+/-9.2 years), the proportion of lower-third tumors and multiple esophageal cancer was significantly higher compared with that of the non-gastrectomized patients (50.0% vs. 33.1%, P=0.033; 14.6% vs. 5.3%, P=0.006, respectively), this increase was more pronounced after Billroth I vs. Billroth II gastrectomy. Pathologically, the esophageal cancers after gastrectomy frequently showed expansive growth pattern (39.6%), while those without gastrectomy dominantly showed infiltrative growth pattern (40.3%) (P=0.012), the coexisting lesions showed well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma confined within the superficial mucosal layer. Compared with the non-gastrectomized patients, the operative time (311.2+/-86.0 vs. 263.7+/-84.9 min; P<0.001) was longer and blood loss (4.38+/-1.33 vs. 3.57+/-1.82 IU; P=0.003) was more, the postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer in gastrectomized patients (median 69 days vs. 40 days, P<0.001). The overall 1, 3, 5, 10-year survival of gastrectomized and non-gastrectomized patients were similar, and their cause-specific 5-year survival were 65% vs. 44% (P=0.992).

CONCLUSIONS

Gastrectomy (especially the Billroth I) precipitated subsequent chronic gastroesophageal reflux and induced the development of squamous dysplasia and carcinoma at multiple locations in the esophagus. Surgical treatment of the gastrectomized patients should be considered as a reliable therapeutic modality because of favorable prognoses.

Oesophagectomy after definitive chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer

AIMS

The clinical benefit of salvage oesophagectomy in patients who recur after radical chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is not clearly defined. This study retrospectively evaluated the outcome in patients who underwent salvage oesophagectomy having failed primary CRT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between March 1999 and October 2005, 181 patients with oesophageal cancer were treated at the Royal Marsden Hospital with definitive CRT. Ten patients underwent salvage oesophagectomy. All of them had locally advanced cancer of the oesophagus at presentation (adenocarcinoma in three patients and squamous cell carcinoma in seven patients) and received combined CRT, consisting of 12 weeks of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy followed by CRT. Radiotherapy was delivered with a computed tomography-planned technique to a dose of 54 Gy with daily 5-fluorouracil.

RESULTS

An Ivor-Lewis procedure was carried out in all cases. The median time between the end of CRT and surgery was 5 months (range 1-67). Curative resection was achieved in three patients, seven had microscopic positive circumferential margins. One patient died postoperatively and complications occurred in four cases: anastomotic leak in two patients, pneumonia in one patient, empyema and sepsis in one patient. The median critical care unit stay was 7 days (range 4-26) and hospitalisation was 21 days (range 15-84). With a median follow-up period of 45.5 months (range 5-89) the 1-, 2- and 3-year survival calculated from the completion of CRT was 70, 50 and 30%, respectively. Median survival was 21.5 months (range 8-90).

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage oesophagectomy may prolong survival in carefully selected patients with local relapse. Patients fit for surgery at presentation benefit from a more intensive follow-up protocol to detect early recurrence.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy or endoscopic stenting for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of esophagus: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the role of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for patients with inoperable squamous esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced or metastatic squamous esophageal carcinoma who received CRT were recruited. The CRT consists of continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil at 200 mg/m(2)/day, and cisplatin at 60 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 22, with concurrent radiotherapy for a total of 50 to 60 Gy in 25 to 30 fractions over 6 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by endoscopy and computed tomographic scan before and 8 weeks after completion of the treatment program. Median survival and the need for palliative esophageal stenting were compared with another group of patients who received endoscopic stenting.

RESULTS

From 1996 to 2003, a total of 36 consecutive patients (33 male, mean +/- SD age 63.2 +/- 9.5 years) with T4 disease (81%) with or without cervical nodal metastasis (50%) received CRT, while 36 patients treated with endoscopic stenting alone were recruited as controls. Both groups were comparable in demographics, pretreatment dysphagia score, comorbidities, and tumor characteristics. CRT was completed in 32 patients (89%). There was no treatment-related mortality. Tumor volume was greatly reduced after CRT in 19 patients. Four patients (11%) received salvage esophagectomy 9 to 42 months after CRT. Compared with the stenting group, CRT statistically significantly improved 5-year survival (15% vs. 0%, P = .01), median survival (10.8 months vs. 4.0 months, P < .005), and need for stenting (22% vs. 100%, P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

Palliative CRT can effectively improve the symptoms of dysphagia in patients with inoperable squamous esophageal carcinoma. It results in better survival compared with endoscopic stenting in these patients.

Treatment outcomes of radiotherapy for patients with stage I esophageal cancer: a single institute experience

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of radiotherapy for patients with stage I esophageal cancer.

METHODS

From 1995 to 2005, 34 patients with superficial thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma without lymph node metastasis were treated with radiotherapy at our institute. Patient characteristics were as follows: median age, 68 years; range, 47 to 84 years; male:female, 33:1; performance status, 0/1/2/3 = 23/9/1/1; T1a/T1b = 4/30. Median fraction and total doses of external irradiation given were 2.0 Gy and 60 Gy, respectively. Twenty-three patients had local irradiation to the primary lesion only; the remaining 11 patients received regional field irradiation, including one or 2 regional lymph node areas. Only one patient received adjuvant intracavitary radiotherapy after radiotherapy. Thirty of the patients received concurrent chemotherapy, most of the regimens of which included cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. Adjuvant chemotherapy was performed in 5 patients. Fifteen patients (44%) had coexisting malignancies. The median follow-up was 38 months (range, 8-107 months).

RESULTS

The 5-year overall, cause-specific, and local-progression-free survival rates were 50.4%, 91.2%, and 81.1%, respectively. Of the 34 patients, 6 had in-field local recurrence, and one had recurrence in the esophagus outside of the irradiated field. Two patients experienced regional lymph node metastasis outside of the irradiated field, and one had distant metastasis. Two patients received salvage surgery, and 4 patients received salvage intracavitary radiotherapy after local recurrence. A late toxicity greater than grade 2 was not observed in any patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiotherapy is an effective treatment modality for patients with stage I esophageal cancer.

Salvage oesophagectomy after local failure of definitive chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is one treatment option for locally advanced oesophageal carcinoma. CRT typically consists of high-dose (50-66 Gy) external beam radiotherapy concurrent with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin. When definitive CRT fails to achieve local control, salvage oesophagectomy is frequently the only treatment available that can offer a chance of long-term survival.

METHODS

Online databases were searched for publications relating to salvage oesophagectomy and definitive CRT. Nine series containing a total of 105 patients were reviewed. Demographics, indications for surgery, type of resection, complications and outcome data were extracted.

RESULTS

Each centre performed one to three salvage resections per year comprising 1.7-4.1 per cent of the oesophagectomy workload. The overall anastomotic leak rate was 17.1 per cent. The in-hospital mortality rate was 11.4 per cent. Five-year survival rates of 25-35 per cent were achieved. Prognostic factors for increased survival were R0 resection (P = 0.006) and longer interval between CRT and recurrence (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Salvage resection after CRT is feasible for selected patients but is a formidable undertaking. Restaging investigations after CRT for potentially resectable tumours in fit candidates should include endoscopy and positron emission tomography-computed tomography. Salvage oesophagectomy is carried out with the goal of cure and it should be attempted only if an R0 resection is technically possible.

Salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer

Salvage esophagectomy is performed for esophageal cancer after definitive chemoradiotherapy. The clinical significance and safety of salvage surgery has not been well established. We reviewed 14 cases of salvage esophagectomy following definitive chemoradiotherapy from 1994 through 2005 and investigated complication rates and outcomes. Seven of 14 cases were completely resected with salvage surgery. Operation time and bleeding were greater in patients who experienced incomplete resection (R1/R2). Anastomosis leakage, pulmonary dysfunction and heart failure were recognized in four, two and one patients, respectively. The postoperative complications were more frequent (71.4%) in patients with incomplete resection (R1/R2) than in patients with complete resection (R0) (28.4%). Two patients with complete resection (R0) showed long-term survival. Salvage esophagectomy may be indicated when the tumor can be resected completely after definitive chemotherapy. However, all cases of T4 cancer cannot be resected completely, resulting in a high risk for complications and poor survival.

Treatment of thoracic esophageal carcinoma invading adjacent structures

T4 esophageal cancer is defined as the tumor invading adjacent structures, using tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging. For clinically T4 thoracic esophageal carcinoma, multimodality therapy, that is, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery or definitive CRT, has generally been performed. However, the prognosis of patients with these tumors remains poor. Another strategy is needed to achieve curative treatment. In the present article, the treatment strategies employed to date are reviewed. Furthermore, the strategies for these malignancies are reassessed, based on our experiences. R1/2 and R0 resections are regarded as those with residual and no tumor after surgery. The present data show that patients who underwent R1/2 resection after neoadjuvant CRT experienced little survival benefit, while complete response (CR) cases after definitive CRT had comparatively better results. Therefore, curative surgery should not be attempted without down-staging, and definitive CRT should be the initial treatment. Then surgery is indicated for the eradication of residual cancer cells. Close surveillance is essential for early detection of relapse even after CR, because the operation will gradually become increasingly difficult due to post-CRT fibrosis. In conclusion, multimodality therapy consists of definitive CRT followed by R0 resection, which can be the treatment of choice for T4 esophageal carcinoma. These challenging treatments have the potential to constitute the most effective therapeutic strategy.

Salvage lymphadenectomy of the right recurrent nerve node with tracheal involvement after definitive chemoradiation therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: report of two cases

Thoracic esophageal cancers frequently metastasize to the right recurrent nerve nodes (RRNNs). In fact, huge RRNNs invading the trachea sometimes remain after definitive chemoradiation therapy (CRT), despite complete remission of the primary lesion. We performed salvage lymphadenectomy of a large RRNN combined with partial resection of the trachea in two patients. Using an anterior approach, we removed part of the sternum, clavicle, and the first and second costal cartilage; then, we removed the RRNNs with combined resection of the lateral quarter circumference of the trachea, the esophageal wall, and the recurrent nerve. Reconstruction was done with a musculocutaneous patch of major pectoral muscle to cover the tracheal defect. The only minor complication was venous thrombosis in one patient. Thus, combined removal of the RRNN and trachea was performed safely as a salvage operation after definitive CRT for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on lymph node micrometastases in squamous cell carcinomas of the thoracic esophagus

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has been postulated but not yet proven to eradicate micrometastases and improve the prognosis of patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCC). Cytokeratin immunohistochemistry of the lymph nodes of ESCC revealed immunohistochemical micrometastases (IHM) and cytokeratin deposits (CD), which are hyalinized denucleated particles considered to be cadavers of carcinoma cells. Successful chemotherapy should convert cancer cells from IHM to CD and improve the status of ESCC patients from systemic disease to regional disease.

METHODS

Cytokeratin immunostaining of surgically removed lymph nodes was performed for 107 patients with node-positive ESCC, including 32 patients without preoperative treatment (Surgery group) and 75 patients undergoing NACT using CDDP, doxorubicin hydrochroride, and 5-fluorouracil (NACT group). Cytokeratin-positive staining was done for serial hematoxylin-eosin-stained sections and classified as pathologic metastasis, IHM, or CD.

RESULTS

CD was observed less frequently in the Surgery group than in the NACT group (6% vs 43%, P < .0001), whereas IHM was more frequent in the former (47% vs 24%, P = .019). IHM was a poor prognostic factor in both groups, whereas CD was a favorable one in the NACT group. The effect of chemotherapy on IHM was classified as eradicated, IHM(-)/CD(+); persistent, IHM(+)/CD(+); no effect, IHM(+)/CD(-); or not informative, IHM(-)/CD(-). This classification correlated well with the clinical response of the primary neoplasm, number of pathologic metastases, and postoperative survival (3-year survival rates: 78%, 18%, 0%, and 38%). IHM/CD was found to be an independent prognostic factor together with the number of pathologic metastases in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Disappearance of IHM and the emergence of CD suggest the eradication of micrometastases by NACT. The clinical benefit of NACT was apparent for IHM(-)/CD(+) patients with node-positive ESCC.

Esofagectomia de resgate após quimiorradioterapia radical exclusiva: resultados do departamento de cirurgia abdôminopélvica do Instituto Nacional de Câncer

OBJETIVO: Relatar a experiência e os resultados da Seção de Cirurgia Abdôminopélvica do Instituto Nacional de Câncer (INCA) com a esofagectomia de resgate em paciente portador de câncer de esôfago recidivado após tratamento quimiorradioterápico exclusivo. MÉTODO: Foram analisados retrospectivamente 14 pacientes portadores de câncer de esôfago recidivado e que foram submetidos à esofagectomia de resgate entre março de 1999 e maio de 2006. Todos os pacientes incluídos no estudo receberam tratamento primário quimiorradioterápico radical exclusivo conforme protocolo RTOG 85-01 e apresentaram persistência ou recidiva de doença. RESULTADOS: A idade média foi de 63 anos (39-72 anos). Oito pacientes eram do sexo masculino e seis pacientes do sexo feminino. Nove pacientes apresentavam o tumor localizado no esôfago médio e cinco pacientes apresentavam doença no esôfago distal, sendo carcinoma epidermóide em 12 pacientes e adenocarcinoma em dois pacientes. A mediana do tempo cirúrgico foi de 305 minutos (240-430 minutos). A ressecção completa do tumor (cirurgia R0) foi realizada em 13 pacientes e somente um paciente apresentou doença residual macroscópica em ápice pulmonar. A morbidade total da série foi de 69,2 %. A mortalidade operatória foi zero (todos os pacientes evoluíram para alta hospitalar). CONCLUSÃO: A esofagectomia de resgate demonstrou-se factível tecnicamente porém apresenta elevada morbidade operatória. Esta modalidade cirúrgica corresponde atualmente ao melhor tratamento disponível para se obter cura nos casos de tumor recidivado ou que tenho persistido com doença após quimiorradioterapia radical exclusiva. Todos os outros tipos de tratamento são considerados paliativos e com resultados de sobre-vida desapontadores.

Release of band cells from the bone marrow is impaired by preoperative chemoradiation in patients with esophageal carcinoma: increased risk of postoperative pneumonia

PURPOSE

To examine the difference in hematological data and postsurgical course after esophagectomy between patients receiving preoperative chemoradiation and patients without preoperative treatment.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus who underwent esophagectomy during the past 2 years were retrospectively analyzed in the study. Six patients had preoperative chemoradiation (CRT group) and 16 patients had no preoperative treatment (non-CRT group). The hematological data, postoperative course, and surgical complications were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Patients in the CRT group were given cisplatin and 5-FU (143 and 6,000 mg on average, respectively) plus an average of 35 Gy of radiation. Although the neutrophil count did not show a significant difference between the two groups, the band cell count was lower in the CRT group compared with the non-CRT group on postoperative day 1 (P<0.05). Postoperative pneumonia was detected in three patients (50%) from the CRT group versus none of the non-CRT group.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative CRT may be a risk factor for postoperative pneumonia in patients with esophageal carcinoma who undergo esophagectomy. The normal bone marrow response of releasing band cells from the postmitotic marrow pool after surgery could be disturbed by CRT, which might contribute to an increase in later pulmonary complications.

Photodynamic therapy as salvage treatment for local failures after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Although definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer shows a high response rate, persistent or recurrent locoregional disease remains a major problem. Salvage esophagectomy is the only curative intent treatment option; however, it carries higher morbidity and mortality rates than primary esophagectomy. Response to second-line chemotherapy is quite dismal.

METHODS

From December 2002 to November 2003, we applied salvage photodynamic therapy to 13 patients with local failures after completion of chemoradiotherapy, 4 patients had local recurrence after achieving a complete response, and 9 had a persistent tumor after chemoradiotherapy. The decision to treat was based on patients' refusal of salvage surgery or chemotherapy. After the intravenous administration of 2 mg/kg of Photofrin, photoradiation treatment with an excimer dye laser was performed for 48 hours and 72 hours after the injection. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

RESULTS

Eight patients (62%) achieved a complete response. After a median follow-up period of 12 months after photodynamic therapy, 6 patients were still free of disease, and the overall survival rate at 1 year was 68.4%. There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that salvage photodynamic therapy could be a promising curative intent treatment option with low morbidity and mortality rates.

Prospective non-randomized trial comparing esophagectomy-followed-by-chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy-followed-by-esophagectomy for T4 esophageal cancers

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Multimodal treatment is commonly adopted for patients with a T4 esophageal cancer. This trial evaluated which therapy offered a better survival: preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or postoperative CRT.

METHODS

Forty-three patients with a T4 esophageal cancer were enrolled in a prospective study in which each patient decided for themselves a treatment arm, CRT-followed-by-esophagectomy or esophagectomy-followed-by-CRT. The CRT-followed-by-esophagectomy Group received 36 Gy radiotherapy and simultaneous chemotherapy using cisplatin (CDDP) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) preoperatively, and then 24 Gy radiotherapy and simultaneous chemotherapy using CDDP and 5FU postoperatively. The esophagectomy-followed-by-CRT Group received 60 Gy radiotherapy with two cycles of simultaneous chemotherapy using CDDP and 5FU postoperatively.

RESULTS

Of 26 patients who chose CRT-followed-by-esophagectomy, 15 (58%) underwent esophagectomy, while 7 (27%) refused surgery and 4 (15%) were inoperable. Of 17 patients who chose esophagectomy-followed-by-CRT, 14 (82%) underwent esophagectomy, while 3 (18%) underwent inspection thoracotomy. The CRT-followed-by-esophagectomy Group showed a significantly better 5-year-survival rate than the esophagectomy-followed-by-CRT Group (26% vs. 0%). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that only the response to CRT was prognostic.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial concluded that the first choice of treatment for patients with a T4 esophageal cancer was prior CRT rather than prior esophagectomy.

A Retrospective Analysis of Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy Followed by Surgery or Surgery Alone

BACKGROUND

We conducted an institutional review of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer who had complete pretreatment and surgical staging to identify variables predictive of outcome.

METHODS

From 1993 through 2002, 286 patients presented for surgical therapy of esophageal cancer. Of these, 176 patients met criteria for review including pretreatment endoscopic ultrasound stages IIA through IVA and a transthoracic surgical approach with "two-field" lymph node dissection. This cohort was primarily male (84.7%, n = 149) with adenocarcinoma (88.6%, n = 156), and 101 patients (57.3%) demonstrated endoscopic ultrasound stage III or IVA.

RESULTS

Eighty-five (48.3%) patients presented to surgery after receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy, and 91 (51.7%) underwent surgery alone. Both groups were well matched with respect to comorbidities and pretreatment stage. Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation demonstrated a nonsignificant trend toward increased operative mortality and nonfatal morbidity. The overall median survival was 16.8 months, and there was no survival difference comparing patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery or surgery alone (p = 0.82). The subset of 25 patients (29.4%) demonstrating a complete pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy however had superior survival (median survival = 57.6 months, p < 0.01) as compared with neoadjuvant chemoradiation patients demonstrating partial downstaging (n = 36, 42.3%), no downstaging (n = 24, 28.2%), and surgery alone patients. Multivariate analysis identified a complete pathologic response, endoscopic ultrasound stage, and number of pathologically positive lymph nodes as independent predictors of survival.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced esophageal cancer as the subset of patients who demonstrate a complete pathologic response experienced significantly better survival.

Clinical outcome of esophageal cancer patients with history of gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Surgery for thoracic esophageal cancer after gastrectomy involves a complicated reconstruction procedure. A surgeon's hesitation is further increased because the clinical outcome of surgical treatment of these patients has not been elucidated.

OBJECTIVES

Among 948 thoracic esophageal cancer patients who underwent curative operation, 72 (7.6%) had a history of gastrectomy. Their clinico-pathological features and survival (follow-up average 881 days) were compared with those without gastrectomy.

RESULTS

Esophagectomy for patients after gastrectomy was performed via right thoracotomy (66), left thoracotomy (4), and transhiatal resection (2), and reconstruction was done using the right-side colon (57) or jejunum (15). Compared to non-gastrectomized patients, gastrectomized patients were exposed to longer operation time (523 min vs. 460 min), but no significant difference was observed in operative mortality (4.2% vs. 2.5%) or blood loss (1,189 ml vs. 990 ml). Pathological examination showed no significant difference in depth of tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis, and TNM staging between gastrectomized and non-gastrectomized patients, while tumors were located at lower position in the gastrectomized patients (P = 0.046). The overall and cause-specific 5-year survival rates were 56% and 65% for gastrectomized esophageal cancer patients, which were significantly better than for non-gastrectomized patients (36% and 44%, P = 0.0235 and 0.024, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed gastrectomy as a marginally independent factor for a favorable prognosis (hazard ratio 1.832, P = 0.0324). With respect to tumor recurrence, hematogenic metastasis tended to be less frequent in gastrectomized patients than in non-gastrectomized patients. In gastrectomized patients, neither disease (peptic ulcer or gastric cancer) nor reconstruction (Billroth-I, Billroth-II, and Roux-Y) for gastrectomy affected the clinicopathological findings or post-operable survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment of esophageal cancer patients after gastrectomy was complicated but tolerable, and should be considered as a reliable therapeutic modality because of favorable patient prognosis.

Esophagectomy: Is It Necessary after Chemoradiotherapy for a Locally Advanced T4 Esophageal Cancer? Prospective Nonrandomized Trial Comparing Chemoradiotherapy with Surgery versus without Surgery

The need for surgery after chemoradiotherapy for a T4N0-1M0 squamous cell carcinoma in the thoracic esophagus was evaluated. A series of 53 patients were enrolled in this prospective nonrandomized trial from among 124 patients with an esophageal cancer assessed as T4 in Kurume University Hospital from 1994 to 2002. After the first chemoradiotherapy cycle, which consisted of radiotherapy in a total dosage of 36 Gy and chemotherapy using cisplatin (CDDP) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU), the patients each decided, after being informed of the efficacy of the chemoradiotherapy, whether to undergo surgery. All patients, including those who had undergone surgery and those who had not, later underwent a second chemoradiotherapy cycle consisting of radiotherapy in a total dosage of 24 Gy and chemotherapy using CDDP and 5FU, as far as practicable. Among the responders to the first chemoradiotherapy cycle, there was no significant difference in the long-term (5-year) survival rate between the 18 patients who underwent esophageal surgery and the 13 patients who did not (23% vs. 23%). Among the nonresponders, the 11 patients who underwent surgery showed a tendency toward longer survival than the five patients who had had no surgery. The nonresponders had 1- and 2-year survival rates of 64% and 33%, respectively. The corresponding rates for the 5 nonsurgical patients who completed the two chemoradiotherapy cycle were 20% and 20%, respectively. For a T4N0-1M0 squamous cell carcinoma in the thoracic esophagus, full-dosage chemoradiotherapy (definitive chemoradiotherapy) is preferred for responders to a half-dose of chemoradiotherapy as much as esophagectomy, whereas esophagectomy may be preferred for nonresponders.