Stimulation of adenosine A1 receptors attenuates dopamine D1 receptor-mediated increase of NGFI-A, c-fos and jun-B mRNA levels in the dopamine-denervated striatum and dopamine D1 receptor-mediated turning behaviour

Presynaptic adenosine receptor heteromers as key modulators of glutamatergic and dopaminergic neurotransmission in the striatum

Adenosine plays a very significant role in modulating striatal glutamatergic and dopaminergic neurotransmission. In the present essay we first review the extensive evidence that indicates this modulation is mediated by adenosine A₁ and A_2A receptors (A₁Rs and A_2ARs) differentially expressed by the components of the striatal microcircuit that include cortico-striatal glutamatergic and mesencephalic dopaminergic terminals, and the cholinergic interneuron. This microcircuit mediates the ability of striatal glutamate release to locally promote dopamine release through the intermediate activation of cholinergic interneurons. A₁Rs and A_2ARs are colocalized in the cortico-striatal glutamatergic terminals, where they form A₁R-A_2AR and A_2AR-cannabinoid CB₁ receptor (CB₁R) heteromers. We then evaluate recent findings on the unique properties of A₁R-A_2AR and A_2AR-CB₁R heteromers, which depend on their different quaternary tetrameric structure. These properties involve different allosteric mechanisms in the two receptor heteromers that provide fine-tune modulation of adenosine and endocannabinoid-mediated striatal glutamate release. Finally, we evaluate the evidence supporting the use of different heteromers containing striatal adenosine receptors as targets for drug development for neuropsychiatric disorders, such as Parkinson's disease and restless legs syndrome, based on the ability or inability of the A_2AR to demonstrate constitutive activity in the different heteromers, and the ability of some A_2AR ligands to act preferentially as neutral antagonists or inverse agonists, or to have preferential affinity for a specific A_2AR heteromer.

Adenosine receptor stimulation inhibits methamphetamine-associated cue seeking

BACKGROUND

Methamphetamine (METH) is a psychostimulant drug that remains a popular and threatening drug of abuse with high abuse liability. There is no established pharmacotherapy to treat METH dependence, but evidence suggests that stimulation of adenosine receptors reduces the reinforcing properties of METH and could be a potential pharmacological target. This study examines the effects of adenosine receptor subtype stimulation on METH seeking using both a cue-induced reinstatement and cue-craving model of relapse.

METHODS

Male and female rats were trained to self-administer METH during daily 2-h sessions. Cue-induced reinstatement of METH seeking was evaluated after extinction training. A systemic pretreatment of an adenosine A1 receptor (A1R) or A2A receptor (A2AR) agonist was administered prior to an extinction or cue session to evaluate the effects of adenosine receptor subtype stimulation on METH seeking. The effects of a systemic pretreatment of A1R or A2AR agonists were also evaluated in a cue-craving model where the cued-seeking test was conducted after 21 days of forced home-cage abstinence without extinction training.

RESULTS

Cue-induced reinstatement was reduced in both male and female rats that received A1R or A2AR agonist pretreatments. Similarly, an A1R or A2AR agonist pretreatment also inhibited cue craving in both male and female rats.

CONCLUSION

Stimulation of either adenosine A1R or A2AR subtypes inhibits METH-seeking behavior elicited by METH-associated cues. These effects may be attributed to the ability of A1R and A2AR stimulation to disrupt cue-induced dopamine and glutamate signaling throughout the brain.

Changes in ERK1/2 phosphorylation in the rat striatum and medial prefrontal cortex following administration of the adenosine A1 receptor agonist and antagonist

The extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) is enriched in the central nervous system, including the dopamine responsive regions such as the striatum and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). The kinase is sensitive to changing cellular and synaptic input and is implicated in the regulation of synaptic transmission and plasticity. In this study, the role of a G_αi/o protein-coupled adenosine A₁ receptor in the regulation of ERK1/2 was investigated in the rat brain in vivo. We found that an A₁ agonist CPA after an intraperitoneal injection reduced ERK1/2 phosphorylation in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and mPFC. In contrast, a single dose of an A₁ antagonist DPCPX induced a rapid and transient increase in ERK1/2 phosphorylation in the caudate putamen (CPu), NAc, and mPFC. Pretreatment with a dopamine D₁ receptor antagonist SCH23390 abolished the DPCPX-induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation in the striatum and mPFC. Coadministration of DPCPX and a D₁ agonist SKF81297 at a low dose induced a greater elevation of ERK1/2 phosphorylation. Activation or blockade of A₁ receptors had no effect on total ERK1/2 expression in the striatum and mPFC. These results reveal an existence of an inhibitory linkage from adenosine A₁ receptors to ERK1/2 in striatal and mPFC neurons. This inhibitory linkage seems to form a dynamic balance with positive dopamine D₁ receptor signaling to control the ERK1/2 pathway.

Adenosine A1-Dopamine D1 Receptor Heteromers Control the Excitability of the Spinal Motoneuron

While the role of the ascending dopaminergic system in brain function and dysfunction has been a subject of extensive research, the role of the descending dopaminergic system in spinal cord function and dysfunction is just beginning to be understood. Adenosine plays a key role in the inhibitory control of the ascending dopaminergic system, largely dependent on functional complexes of specific subtypes of adenosine and dopamine receptors. Combining a selective destabilizing peptide strategy with a proximity ligation assay and patch-clamp electrophysiology in slices from male mouse lumbar spinal cord, the present study demonstrates the existence of adenosine A₁-dopamine D₁ receptor heteromers in the spinal motoneuron by which adenosine tonically inhibits D₁ receptor-mediated signaling. A₁-D₁ receptor heteromers play a significant control of the motoneuron excitability, represent main targets for the excitatory effects of caffeine in the spinal cord and can constitute new targets for the pharmacological therapy after spinal cord injury, motor aging-associated disorders and restless legs syndrome.

Pivotal Role of Adenosine Neurotransmission in Restless Legs Syndrome

The symptomatology of Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) includes periodic leg movements during sleep (PLMS), dysesthesias, and hyperarousal. Alterations in the dopaminergic system, a presynaptic hyperdopaminergic state, seem to be involved in PLMS, while alterations in glutamatergic neurotransmission, a presynaptic hyperglutamatergic state, seem to be involved in hyperarousal and also PLMS. Brain iron deficiency (BID) is well-recognized as a main initial pathophysiological mechanism of RLS. BID in rodents have provided a pathogenetic model of RLS that recapitulates the biochemical alterations of the dopaminergic system of RLS, although without PLMS-like motor abnormalities. On the other hand, BID in rodents reproduces the circadian sleep architecture of RLS, indicating the model could provide clues for the hyperglutamatergic state in RLS. We recently showed that BID in rodents is associated with changes in adenosinergic transmission, with downregulation of adenosine A₁ receptors (A1R) as the most sensitive biochemical finding. It was hypothesized that A1R downregulation leads to hypersensitive striatal glutamatergic terminals and facilitation of striatal dopamine release. Hypersensitivity of striatal glutamatergic terminals was demonstrated by an optogenetic-microdialysis approach in the rodent with BID, indicating that it could represent a main pathogenetic factor that leads to PLMS in RLS. In fact, the dopaminergic agonists pramipexole and ropinirole and the α₂δ ligand gabapentin, used in the initial symptomatic treatment of RLS, completely counteracted optogenetically-induced glutamate release from both normal and BID-induced hypersensitive corticostriatal glutamatergic terminals. It is a main tenet of this essay that, in RLS, a single alteration in the adenosinergic system, downregulation of A1R, disrupts the adenosine-dopamine-glutamate balance uniquely controlled by adenosine and dopamine receptor heteromers in the striatum and also the A1R-mediated inhibitory control of glutamatergic neurotransmission in the cortex and other non-striatal brain areas, which altogether determine both PLMS and hyperarousal. Since A1R agonists would be associated with severe cardiovascular effects, it was hypothesized that inhibitors of nucleoside equilibrative transporters, such as dipyridamole, by increasing the tonic A1R activation mediated by endogenous adenosine, could represent a new alternative therapeutic strategy for RLS. In fact, preliminary clinical data indicate that dipyridamole can significantly improve the symptomatology of RLS.

Increased sensitivity in the interaction of the dopaminergic/adenosinergic system at the level of the adenylate cyclase activity in the striatum of the "weaver" mouse

The specific antagonistic interaction between dopamine D1 and adenosine A1 receptors (D1/A1), as well as between dopamine D2 and adenosine A2a receptors (D2/A2a) exist not only at the receptor/receptor level, but also at the level of the secondary messengers. In this study, we examined the possible changes in these interactions at the level of cAMP formation in membrane preparation from "weaver" mouse striatum (a genetic model of Parkinson disease), by using specific agonists of these receptors. We also examined in the striatum of the "weaver" mouse the interaction between D1 and D2 dopamine receptors. Our results showed that in the striatum of "weaver" mice: a) the cAMP synthesis induced by D1 receptor activation (SKF 38393), was significantly reduced compared to control mice, while A1 receptor activation (L-PIA) leaded to a more intense inhibition of the D1-induced cAMP-formation compared to the controls, b) the cAMP synthesis which was induced by A2a receptor activation (CGS 21680), was significantly increased compared to the control mice. The specific D2 receptor agonist Quinpirole, added in low concentrations, caused a significant reduction of the A2a-induced cAMP formation, which was not observed in the control mouse. Furthermore, the D1 receptor induced cAMP synthesis was significantly higher in control compared to "weaver" striatum, which was more efficiently downregulated by D2 receptor agonist Quinpirole. These results suggest that the sensitivity to D1 and A2a receptor agonists is altered and that the interaction between D1/A1 and D2/A2a receptors is enhanced in the striatum of the "weaver" mutation, while an uncoupling between D1 and D2 receptors was observed. Since the adenylate cyclase basal activity did not differ between "weaver" and control striatum, the above-mentioned changes seem to be due to alterations in the function of the adenosine/dopamine receptors and their coupling to the G-proteins.

Caffeine stimulates locomotor activity in the mammalian spinal cord via adenosine A1 receptor-dopamine D1 receptor interaction and PKA-dependent mechanisms

Caffeine is a potent psychostimulant that can have significant and widely variable effects on the activity of multiple neuronal pathways. The most pronounced caffeine-induced behavioral effect seen in rodents is to increase locomotor activity which has been linked to a dose-dependent inhibition of A1 and A(2A) receptors. The effects of caffeine at the level of the lumbar spinal central pattern generator (CPG) network for hindlimb locomotion are lacking. We assessed the effects of caffeine to the locomotor function of the spinal CPG network via extracellular ventral root recordings using the isolated neonatal mouse spinal cord preparation. Addition of caffeine and of an A1 receptor antagonist significantly decreased the cycle period accelerating the ongoing locomotor rhythm, while decreasing burst duration reversibly in most preparations suggesting the role of A1 receptors as the primary target of caffeine. Caffeine and an A1 receptor antagonist failed to stimulate ongoing locomotor activity in the absence of dopamine or in the presence of a D1 receptor antagonist supporting A1/D1 receptor-dependent mechanism of action. The use of caffeine or an A1 receptor blocker failed to stimulate an ongoing locomotor rhythm in the presence of a blocker of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) supporting the need of this intracellular pathway for the modulatory effects of caffeine to occur. These results support a stimulant effect of caffeine on the lumbar spinal network controlling hindlimb locomotion through the inhibition of A1 receptors and subsequent activation of D1 receptors via a PKA-dependent intracellular mechanism.

Role of adenosine receptor subtypes in methamphetamine reward and reinforcement

The neurobiology of methamphetamine (MA) remains largely unknown despite its high abuse liability. The present series of studies explored the role of adenosine receptors on MA reward and reinforcement and identified alterations in the expression of adenosine receptors in dopamine terminal areas following MA administration in rats. We tested whether stimulating adenosine A1 or A2A receptor subtypes would influence MA-induced place preference or MA self-administration on fixed and progressive ratio schedules in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Stimulation of either adenosine A1 or A2A receptors significantly reduced the development of MA-induced place preference. Stimulating adenosine A1, but not A2A, receptors reduced MA self-administration responding. We next tested whether repeated experimenter-delivered MA administration would alter the expression of adenosine receptors in the striatal areas using immunoblotting. We observed no change in the expression of adenosine receptors. Lastly, rats were trained to self-administer MA or saline for 14 days and we detected changes in adenosine A1 and A2A receptor expression using immunoblotting. MA self-administration significantly increased adenosine A1 in the nucleus accumbens shell, caudate-putamen and prefrontal cortex. MA self-administration significantly decreased adenosine A2A receptor expression in the nucleus accumbens shell, but increased A2A receptor expression in the amygdala. These findings demonstrate that MA self-administration produces selective alterations in adenosine receptor expression in the nucleus accumbens shell and that stimulation of adenosine receptors reduces several behavioral indices of MA addiction. Together, these studies shed light onto the neurobiological alterations incurred through chronic MA use that may aid in the development of treatments for MA addiction.

Adenosine A1 and dopamine d1 receptor regulation of AMPA receptor phosphorylation and cocaine-seeking behavior

AMPAR (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionate glutamate receptor) stimulation in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) is critical in cocaine seeking. Here, we investigate the functional interaction between D1 dopamine receptors (D1DR) and AMPARs in the NAc, and explore how A1 adenosine receptor (A1AR) stimulation may reduce dopamine-induced facilitation of AMPARs and cocaine seeking. All animals were trained to self-administer cocaine and were tested for reinstatement of cocaine seeking following extinction procedures. The role of AMPARs in both AMPA- and D1DR-induced cocaine seeking was assessed using viral-mediated gene transfer to bi-directionally modulate AMPAR activity in the NAc core. The ability of pharmacological AMPAR blockade to modulate D1DR-induced cocaine seeking also was tested. Immunoblotting was used to determine whether stimulating D1DR altered synaptic AMPA GluA1 phosphorylation (pGluA1). Finally, the ability of an A1AR agonist to modulate D1DR-induced cocaine seeking and synaptic GluA1 receptor subunit phosphorylation was explored. Decreasing AMPAR function inhibited both AMPA- and D1DR-induced cocaine seeking. D1DR stimulation increased AMPA pGluA1(S845). Administration of the A1AR agonist alone decreased synaptic GluA1 expression, whereas coadministration of the A1AR agonist inhibited both cocaine- and D1DR-induced cocaine seeking and reversed D1DR-induced AMPA pGluA1(S845). These findings suggest that D1DR stimulation facilitates AMPAR function to initiate cocaine seeking in D1DR-containing direct pathway NAc neurons. A1AR stimulation inhibits both the facilitation of AMPAR function and subsequent cocaine seeking, suggesting that reducing AMPA glutamate neurotransmission in direct pathway neurons may restore inhibitory control and reduce cocaine relapse.

Stimulation of adenosine receptors in the nucleus accumbens reverses the expression of cocaine sensitization and cross-sensitization to dopamine D2 receptors in rats

Adenosine receptors co-localize with dopamine receptors on medium spiny nucleus accumbens (NAc) neurons where they antagonize dopamine receptor activity. It remains unclear whether adenosine receptor stimulation in the NAc restores cocaine-induced enhancements in dopamine receptor sensitivity. The goal of these studies was to determine whether stimulating A(1) or A(2A) receptors in the NAc reduces the expression of cocaine sensitization. Rats were sensitized with 7 daily treatments of cocaine (15 mg/kg, i.p.). Following one-week withdrawal, the effects of intra-NAc microinjections of the adenosine kinase inhibitor (ABT-702), the adenosine deaminase inhibitor (deoxycoformycin; DCF), the specific A(1) receptor agonist (CPA) and the specific A(2A) receptor agonist (CGS 21680) were tested on the behavioral expression of cocaine sensitization. The results indicate that intra-NAc pretreatment of ABT-702 and DCF dose-dependently blocked the expression of cocaine sensitization while having no effects on acute cocaine sensitivity, suggesting that upregulation of endogenous adenosine in the accumbens is sufficient to non-selectively stimulate adenosine receptors and reverse the expression of cocaine sensitization. Intra-NAc treatment of CPA significantly inhibited the expression of cocaine sensitization, which was reversed by both A(1) and A(2A) receptor antagonism. Intra-NAc treatment of CGS 21680 also significantly inhibited the expression of cocaine sensitization, which was selectively reversed by A(2A), but not A(1), receptor antagonism. Finally, CGS 21680 also inhibited the expression of quinpirole cross-sensitization. Together, these findings suggest that adenosine receptor stimulation in the NAc is sufficient to reverse the behavioral expression of cocaine sensitization and that A(2A) receptors blunt cocaine-induced sensitization of postsynaptic D(2) receptors.

Adenosine receptor–dopamine receptor interactions in the basal ganglia and their relevance for brain function

The dopamine D1 and D2 receptors are major receptors in the regulation of striatal function and striatal adenosine A1 and A2A receptors are major modulators of their signaling. The evidence suggests the existence of antagonistic A1-D1 heteromeric receptor complexes in the basal ganglia and prefrontal cortex and especially in the direct striatonigral-striatoentopeduncular GABA pathways. The neurochemical and behavioral findings showing antagonistic A1-D1 receptor interactions can be explained by the existence of such A1-D1 heteromeric receptor complexes and of antagonistic interactions at the level of the second messengers. In contrast, A2A-D2 receptor heteromers may exist in the dorsal and ventral striato-pallidal GABA pathways, where activation of A2A receptors reduces D2 receptor recognition, coupling and signaling. As a result of the A2A receptor-induced reduction of D2 receptor signaling, the activity of these GABA neurons is increased resulting in reduced motor and reward functions mediated via the indirect pathway, causing a reduced glutamate drive to the prefrontal and motor areas of the cerebral cortex. Thus, A2A receptor antagonists and A2A receptor agonists, respectively, may offer novel treatments of Parkinson's disease (reduced D2 receptor signaling) and of schizophrenia and drug addiction (increased D2 receptor signaling).

Behavioral recovery following sub-chronic paeoniflorin administration in the striatal 6-OHDA lesion rodent model of Parkinson's disease

In the present studies, the effect of paeoniflorin (PF), one of the main compounds extracted from Paeoniae radix, in alleviating the neurological impairment following unilateral striatal 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) lesion was examined in Sprague-Dawley rats. Sub-chronic PF (2.5, 5 and 10 mg/kg, s.c., twice daily for 11 days) administration dose-dependently reduced apomorphine (APO)-induced rotation, suggesting that PF had an ameliorative effect on the 6-OHDA-induced neurological impairment. Notably, PF had no direct action on dopamine D(1) receptor or dopamine D(2) receptor indicated by the competitive binding experiments. These results suggest that PF, an active component of Paeoniae radix, might provide an opportunity to introduce a non-dopaminergic management of Parkinson's disease.

Stimulation of adenosine receptors selectively activates gene expression in striatal enkephalinergic neurons

In the striatum, adenosine A2A and dopamine D2 receptors exert reciprocal antagonistic interactions that modulate the function of GABAergic enkephalinergic neurons. We have previously shown that stimulation of adenosine A1 receptors allows the stimulation of A2A receptors to overcome a tonic inhibitory effect of D2 receptors and induce striatal expression of c-fos. In the present work, by studying co-localization of c-Fos immunoreactivity and preproenkephalin and preprodynorphin transcripts, we show that co-administration of the A1 receptor agonist CPA and the A2A receptor agonist CGS 21680 increases the striatal expression of c-fos in GABAergic enkephalinergic but not in GABAergic dynorphinergic neurons. Co-administration of CPA and CGS 21680 also induced a significant increase in the striatal expression of preproenkephalin. The results underscore the role of adenosine in the activation of gene expression in the GABAergic enkephalinergic neuron.

ROLE OF ADENOSINE IN THE CONTROL OF HOMOSYNAPTIC PLASTICITY IN STRIATAL EXCITATORY SYNAPSES

Long-lasting, activity-dependent changes in synaptic efficacy at excitatory synapses are critical for experience-dependent synaptic plasticity. Synaptic plasticity at excitatory synapses is determined both presynaptically by changes in the probability of neurotransmitter release, and postsynaptically by changes in the availability of functional postsynaptic glutamate receptors. Two kinds of synaptic plasticity have been described. In homosynaptic or Hebbian plasticity, the events responsible for synaptic strengthening occur at the same synapse as is being strengthened. Homosynaptic plasticity is activity-dependent and associative, because it associates the firing of a postsynaptic neuron with that of the presynaptic neuron. Heterosynaptic plasticity, on the other hand, is activity-independent and the synaptic strength is modified as a result of the firing of a third, modulatory neuron. It has been suggested that long-term changes in synaptic strength, which are associated with gene transcription, can only be induced with the involvement of heterosynaptic plasticity. The neuromodulator adenosine plays an elaborated pre- and postsynaptic control of glutamatergic neurotransmission. This paper reviews the evidence suggesting that in some striatal excitatory synapses, adenosine can provide the heterosynaptic-like modulation essential for stabilizing homosynaptic plasticity without the need of a "third, modulatory neuron".

Effects of adenosine A1, dopamine D1 and metabotropic glutamate 5 receptors-modulating agents on locomotion of the reserpinised rats

The pathophysiology of Parkinson's disease and l-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (l-DOPA)-induced dyskinesia are characterised by an imbalance between activity of the direct and indirect pathways regulated by dopamine D1 and D2 receptors, respectively. In this study, we investigated the effects of treatments combining adenosine A(1) and metabotropic glutamate 5 (mGlu5) receptors modulators on locomotion induced by dopamine D1 receptor activation in the reserpine-treated rats. Administration of the adenosine A(1) receptor agonist and mGlu5 receptor antagonist resulted in the significant reduction of dopamine D1 receptor agonist-induced locomotion. The combination of adenosine A(1) receptor agonist with mGlu5 receptor antagonist had no greater effect than these compounds alone. However, the adenosine A(1) receptor antagonist attenuated the inhibitory effect of mGlu5 receptor antagonist. The data suggest that the effect of mGlu5 receptor blockade on locomotion elicited by dopamine D1 receptor stimulation involves activation of adenosine A(1) receptors. This interaction can improve our understanding of pathophysiology of L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia.

Molecular mechanisms and therapeutical implications of intramembrane receptor/receptor interactions among heptahelical receptors with examples from the striatopallidal GABA neurons

The molecular basis for the known intramembrane receptor/receptor interactions among G protein-coupled receptors was postulated to be heteromerization based on receptor subtype-specific interactions between different types of receptor homomers. The discovery of GABAB heterodimers started this field rapidly followed by the discovery of heteromerization among isoreceptors of several G protein-coupled receptors such as delta/kappa opioid receptors. Heteromerization was also discovered among distinct types of G protein-coupled receptors with the initial demonstration of somatostatin SSTR5/dopamine D2 and adenosine A1/dopamine D1 heteromeric receptor complexes. The functional meaning of these heteromeric complexes is to achieve direct or indirect (via adapter proteins) intramembrane receptor/receptor interactions in the complex. G protein-coupled receptors also form heteromeric complexes involving direct interactions with ion channel receptors, the best example being the GABAA/dopamine D5 receptor heteromerization, as well as with receptor tyrosine kinases and with receptor activity modulating proteins. As an example, adenosine, dopamine, and glutamate metabotropic receptor/receptor interactions in the striatopallidal GABA neurons are discussed as well as their relevance for Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia, and drug dependence. The heterodimer is only one type of heteromeric complex, and the evidence is equally compatible with the existence of higher order heteromeric complexes, where also adapter proteins such as homer proteins and scaffolding proteins can exist. These complexes may assist in the process of linking G protein-coupled receptors and ion channel receptors together in a receptor mosaic that may have special integrative value and may constitute the molecular basis for some forms of learning and memory.

Adenosine/dopamine interaction: implications for the treatment of Parkinson's disease

Evidence for a role of dopaminergic neurotransmission in the motor effects of adenosine antagonists, such as caffeine, is reviewed, based on the existence of specific antagonistic interactions between specific subtypes of adenosine and dopamine receptors in the striatum. Both adenosine A(1) and adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonists induce motor activation in rodents. At least a certain degree of dopaminergic activity is required to obtain adenosine antagonist-induced motor activation, with adenosine A(1) antagonists being the most sensitive and non-selective adenosine antagonists the most resistant to striatal dopamine depletion. When considering long-term treatment with adenosine antagonists concomitant administration of dopamine agonists might be required in order to obtain strong motor effects (cross-sensitization) and to avoid the development of telerance.