Association between ACE inhibitors use and headache caused by nitrates among hypertensive patients: results from the Italian group of pharmacoepidemiology in the elderly (GIFA)

Associations between environmental perchlorate, nitrate, and thiocyanate exposure and severe headache or migraine: a cross-sectional, population-based analysis

Background

Environmental contaminants may play a significant role in the development of migraine. Perchlorate, nitrate, and thiocyanate were selected for this study due to their known impact on thyroid function, which is closely linked to neurological processes. Disruptions in thyroid function have been associated with various neurological disorders, including migraines. However, there is currently no evidence linking exposure to these specific chemicals to migraine. The study aims to evaluate the association between urinary concentrations of perchlorate, nitrate, and thiocyanate with the prevalence of severe headache or migraine in U.S. adults.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2001-2004. Utilizing electrospray tandem mass spectrometry in conjunction with ion chromatography, urinary concentrations of perchlorate, nitrate, and thiocyanate urine were measured. Multiple logistic regression models were employed to evaluate the linear correlation between perchlorate, nitrate, and thiocyanate exposure and severe headache or migraine. The non-linear relationship is described analytically using a fitted smoothing curve and a two-piecewise regression model. Subgroup analyses were used to further clarify the stability of this relationship across different populations.

Results

There were 1,446 participants in this population-based study, ranging in age from 20 to 85. After adjusting for potential confounding variables, the multiple logistic regression findings demonstrated that thiocyanate was significantly positively associated with the prevalence of migraine (odds ratio [OR] = 1.18; [1.06, 1.30]; p < 0.001). There was consistency in this connection across different subgroups (p for interaction >0.05). Furthermore, there was a non-linear correlation between urinary thiocyanate and migraine. Using a fitted smoothing curve and a two-piecewise regression model, it was found that the correlation between urinary thiocyanate and migraine was U-shaped (p for Log-likelihood ratio = 0.002). According to the findings of the multiple regression analysis, there was no significant correlation between urinary perchlorate and nitrate and migraine (both p > 0.05).

Conclusion

We should limit our exposure to thiocyanate by keeping it within a reasonable range, as indicated by the U-shaped correlation between urinary thiocyanate and migraine.

Current understanding of the link between angiotensin-converting enzyme and pain perception

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is known to affect diverse physiological processes that affect the functioning of many key organs. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) modulates a variety of bioactive peptides associated with pain. ACE inhibitors (ACEis) have found applications in the treatment of cardiovascular, kidney, neurological and metabolic disorders. However, ACEis also tend to display undesirable effects, resulting in increased pain sensitization and mechanical allodynia. In this review, we provide comprehensive discussion of preclinical and clinical studies involving the evaluation of various clinically approved ACEis. With the emerging knowledge of additional factors involved in RAS signaling and the indistinct pharmacological role of ACE substrates in pain, extensive studies are still required to elucidate the mechanistic role of ACE in pain perception.

Correlation between Medications Used during COVID Infection and Post-conditions after the Acute Phase of Infection: A Cross-sectional Study

Background:

During the COVID-19 pandemic, off-label medication prescribing and utilizing herbal products and multiple vitamins in the treatment, prevention, and symptom management of COVID-19 was an urgently needed practice to halt the SARS-CoV-2 infection crisis and progression.

Objectives:

This study aimed to determine the correlation between medications used during the pandemic and SARS-CoV-2 infection post-recovery symptoms.

Methods:

A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted on recovered COVID-19 patients. There were 20 multiple-choice questions, including patient demographics, treatment, and post-recovery symptoms. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used to investigate significant relationships. In addition, Binary logistic regression was performed to determine confounders. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 22.

Results:

Medications and supplements varied in their therapeutic effects on SARS-CoV-2 post-recovery symptoms. Patients who took vitamin D and calcium experienced increased symptom frequency, and patients taking ACE inhibitors experienced more headaches and coughs. Furthermore, patients receiving azithromycin were asymptomatic after recovery. Patients who took H2 antagonists reported persistent headaches and muscle pain.

Conclusion:

Patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 have responded differently to medications, multivitamins, and herbal supplements. Patients reported resolution of some symptoms and persistence of others post-recovery. Therefore, expert opinion should be considered in COVID-19 management until randomized controlled trials answer many questions and determine medications' safety and efficacy in prevention, treatment strategies, and symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection post-recovery.

Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System and Migraine: A Systematic Review of Human Studies

Migraine is a common neurologic condition marked by recurrent episodes of headache. Its pathophysiology is highly complex involving neuronal, inflammatory and vascular mechanisms. The Renin-Angiotensin System (RAS) can modulate all these mechanism, being a potential pharmacological target for migraine treatment. We carried out a systematic review of the studies evaluating the involvement of RAS in patients with migraine. There is evidence from genetic studies exploring the relation between migraine and RAS-related genes and from clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of Angiotensin II Type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonists and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in migraine prophylaxis. RAS seems to play a role in the pathophysiology of migraine, but more direct evidence is still missing.

An evidence-based systematic review of the off-label uses of lisinopril

AIMS

Lisinopril is an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor that is largely administered for off-label uses. This study aims to provide a comprehensive review of off-label uses of lisinopril to aid physicians to make evidence-based decisions.

METHODS

The following bibliographic databases were searched from inception up to 30 March 2017: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Ovid and Proquest. This systematic review sought all randomized trials conducted on adult individuals comparing lisinopril on its off-label uses with alternative drugs or placebos and reported direct or alternative clinical outcomes. Risk of bias assessment by using the Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool and quality evaluation took place.

RESULTS

Included studies demonstrated significant positive effects of lisinopril on proteinuric kidney disease; however, lisinopril caused a slight reduction of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) especially for patients with GFR < 90 ml min-1 . Lisinopril offered better outcomes in comparison to other standard treatments of diabetic nephropathy. Other studies showed positive effects of lisinopril for migraine, prevention of diabetes, myocardial fibrosis, mitral valve regurgitation, cardiomyopathy in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, oligospermia and infertility, and diabetic retinopathy. Conversely, the studies reported that lisinopril was ineffective for five other off-label uses.

CONCLUSIONS

The identified studies showed that lisinopril was highly effective for proteinuric kidney disease with a minor but inconsiderable decrease in GFR. Positive effects of lisinopril were demonstrated in seven other off-label uses; however, lisinopril cannot be recommended as the first choice for these until further clinical trials confirm these positive effects.

Role of angiotensin modulation in primary headaches

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is a major regulatory system controlling many different homeostatic mechanisms both within the brain and in the periphery. While it is primarily associated with blood pressure and salt/water regulation, increasing evidence points to the involvement of the RAS in both headache disorders specifically and pain regulation in general. Several publications have indicated that drugs blocking various elements of the renin-angiotensin system lead to a reduction in migraine. Additionally, interventions on different angiotensin peptides or their receptors have been shown to both reduce and increase pain in animal models. As such, modulation of the renin-angiotensin system is a promising approach to the treatment of headaches and other pain conditions.

The renin-angiotensin system: a possible contributor to migraine pathogenesis and prophylaxis

The presence of a tissue-based renin-angiotensin system, independent of the systemic one, has been identified in several organs including the brain. Experimental models have suggested the involvement of the renin-angiotensin system in neurogenic inflammation, susceptibility to oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, and neuromodulation of nociceptive transmission, thus potentially contributing to the pathogenesis of migraine. Genetic factors that increase susceptibility to migraine may include angiotensin-converting enzyme polymorphism, although available data are controversial. Clinical studies have suggested that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers may be effective in migraine prophylaxis. However, further research should clarify whether the postulated preventive effect is attributable to a pharmacological action over and above the antihypertensive effect and should test their tolerability in subjects with normal blood pressure values. In patients with contraindications or not responding to conventional prophylactic drugs and in patients with comorbid arterial hypertension, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers may be used for migraine prophylaxis.

Elevated blood pressure and analgesic overuse in chronic daily headache: an outpatient clinic-based study from China

BACKGROUND

Many studies have reported that hypertension is common in chronic daily headache (CDH) and its subtype chronic migraine (CM), but the reason is still poorly understood. Our clinical literature review suggested that analgesic overuse may be associated with elevated blood pressure (BP), so we performed the present study to investigate the frequency of elevated BP and its link with analgesic overuse in CDH and its subtypes.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted in neurology outpatients with a diagnosis of CDH according to International Headache Society criteria. CDH patients were classified into CM and non-CM groups, and subclassified with or without analgesic overuse.

RESULTS

Elevated BP was present in 27.96% of CDH patients. Compared with non-CM patients, patients with CM had a longer duration of headache and more severe pain intensity, and a family history of headache and analgesic overuse were also more common, but the elevated BP frequency was not different between the two groups. Almost one-third of the patients had analgesic overuse; 96.8% of which comprised acetaminophen-containing agents. Those with analgesic overuse had a higher frequency of headache than those without analgesic overuse in both the CM and non-CM groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the CM patients had a longer duration of headache, more severe intensity, the frequency of elevated BP wasn't higher than non-CM group. Analgesic overuses maybe the reason of higher frequency of elevated BP in CDH and its subtypes. This may have predictive value for clinicians to improve CDH management.

Potentially inappropriate medication in elderly hospitalized patients

Balanced and safe prescribing is difficult to achieve in frail older adults with multiple comorbid diseases. This issue is of particular concern, especially in elderly hospitalized patients because hospitalization exposes such individuals to an increased risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The avoidance of medications that are considered to be inappropriate is among the interventions for treatment options in elderly patients. A potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) is a drug in which the risk of an adverse event outweighs its clinical benefit, particularly when there is a safer or more effective alternative therapy for the same condition. Explicit criteria have been developed to identify PIMs and among these, Beers' criteria are the most frequently applied in the literature. However, evidence suggests that such criteria cannot easily be applied to elderly hospitalized people in European countries; approximately 20% of drugs listed in Beers' criteria are rarely prescribed or are not available in Europe, and Beers' listed PIMs are not associated with inhospital mortality, length of hospital stay and/or ADRs in Italian studies. On the contrary, ADRs can contribute to accelerated functional decline in elderly hospitalized patients independently of the use of Beers' listed PIMs. Therefore, we will review the evidence pertaining to the application of Beers' criteria in elderly hospitalized patients, while focusing on Italian studies that have investigated the role of PIMs as potential predictors of negative hospital outcomes. In addition, we will also review the available evidence regarding new European criteria on identifying PIMs, because clinical application in elderly hospitalized Europeans is still under investigation.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers for the Prevention of Migraines

Objective:

To evaluate the literature examining the efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) for migraine prophylaxis.

Data Sources:

MEDLINE (1966–October 2009) and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts were searched using the terms migraine, headache, renina-ngiotensin system, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin receptor blocker, aldosterone antagonist, and the individual agents in these classes.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

English-language human clinical trials, case reports, and systematic reviews were evaluated for efficacy and safety data. The references of reviewed articles were examined to identify additional sources.

Data Synthesis:

Preventative trials evaluating ACE inhibitors consist of a case series, 2 open-label trials, and a placebo-controlled trial. Lisinopril reduced headache hours 20%, headache days 17%, and migraine days 21% versus placebo In the controlled trial (p < 0.06). Clinically significant (>50%) reductions in migraine measures were more common (52–66%) in open-label ACE inhibitor trials than in the controlled (32–36%) trial. Preventive trials evaluating ARBs consist of a meta-analysis, an open-label trial, and 2 placebo-controlled trials. Candesartan reduced headache hours 31%, headache days 26%, and migraine days 28% versus placebo in the first controlled trial (p ≤ 0.001). Telmisartan did not reduce any prespecified primary or secondary outcome measures in the second controlled trial. Clinically significant reductions (>50%) in migraine measures were more common (54–88%) in open-label ARB trials than in the controlled (26–38%) trials. A prescription database review found that ACE inhibitor or ARB therapy halved the use of abortive migraine agents compared to diuretic therapy.

Conclusions:

ACE inhibitors and ARBs have migraine prophylaxis activity similar to that of some currently utilized agents. Low-dose lisinopril or candesartan may be reasonable second- or third-line agents, particularly in patients with other indications for ACE inhibitor or ARB therapy. Further controlled clinical trials are needed to delineate the role of these agents in migraine prevention.

Involvement of the renin–angiotensin system in migraine

Migraine is a common episodic headache that predominantly affects young adults, particularly women in their most productive years. Many of the prophylactic agents available today have side-effects that are not compatible with long-term use. The discovery that drugs influencing the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), which have few side-effects, were effective in some patients with migraine led to several studies investigating a possible link between the angiotensin system and migraine pathophysiology. Clinical trials indicated that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are effective in the prophylactic treatment of migraine. These findings are further supported by pharmacoepidemiological, genetic, and physiological studies. In addition, it is known that the RAS has neurophysiological, chemical, and immunological effects that are of relevance in migraine pathophysiology. On the basis of evidence presented in this review, we find it likely that the RAS has a clinically important role in migraine pathophysiology. The effect of ARBs and ACEIs on migraine is probably not attributable to their effect on blood pressure. The RAS has several actions that may be relevant in migraine pathophysiology, but the reason for the prophylactic effect of ARBs/ACEIs in migraine remains a matter of speculation.

A population-based study on well-being in the very old: the role of cardiovascular diseases and drugs

Cardiovascular diseases constitute the most common health problems in very old people. Consequently, cardiovascular drugs are the medicines that are most frequently used by elderly subjects. Although many studies have examined the physiological effect and adverse reactions of these drugs, knowledge on their effect on emotional well-being is missing. The present study aims to examine the association between cardiovascular diseases and their medical treatment on the emotional well-being of very old people. We investigated a representative group of elderly subjects gathered from a population-based study (n=235). Participants were 84 years or older and cognitively intact (mini-mental state examination (MMSE) > or =24 points). Well-being was assessed with the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS), measuring different mood categories. Cardiovascular diseases were diagnosed following the International Classification of Diseases. In this population the prevalence of cardiovascular diseases was high (62%). Multivariate regression analysis showed that while being affected by a cardiovascular disease did not affect the emotional well-being of the subjects (PANAS-PA, p=0.171; PANAS-NA, p=0.209), the use of some cardiovascular drugs showed an association. Cardiac glycosides (p=0.006) and nitrates (p=0.008) were associated with increased negative feelings. Due to high prevalence of cardiovascular diseases and use of cardiovascular medicines, this finding has relevance on the quality of life of elderly people. However, due to the nature of this study we cannot assess cause-effect relationship of this positive association. Therefore, the present findings suggest that there is a need for clinical studies in this increasing and limited studied age group.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors side effects--physiologic and non-physiologic considerations

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are increasingly recognized as having an important role in the treatment of hypertension and/or end-organ disease. The sheer number of ACE inhibitors in the United States--now numbering 10 different chemical entities--has created a sense of comfort with these compounds, which is particularly evident when these compounds are used in the patient with essential hypertension; conversely, when comorbid conditions are present in the ACE inhibitor-treated patient, circumstances change and physician vigilance becomes more of a necessity. ACE inhibitor therapy in patients with either cardiac and/or renal disease is as much an art as it is a science, and even in the most skilled hands can prove a challenging undertaking. This review discusses the physiologic and non-physiologic basis for side effects with ACE inhibition.