A multidisciplinary approach to hemodialysis access: prospective evaluation

Multidisciplinary working group: key role for percutaneous endovascular AV fistula program. Point of view

Chronic kidney disease is a progressive condition that affects more than 10% of the general population worldwide. Hemodialysis is the most common therapeutic option for kidney failure, which develops in around one out of 1000 individuals in the general population. Hemodialysis needs a vascular access to connect to the extracorporeal machine. In the last few years percutaneous endovascular arterio-venous fistula technique has been increasingly employed with very promising results. Several advantages have been demonstrated in comparison to the standard surgical creation of an arteriovenous fistula. The percutaneous endovascular arterio-venous fistula technique requires multidisciplinary team work. In our practice, we have organized a multidisciplinary team that includes nephrologists, play a key role, interventional radiologists, vascular surgeons, anesthesiologists, and dialysis nurses. Procedural outcomes and feedback received from patients and family members are evaluated periodically in order to improve results. Nephrologists are involved in each step of the management of the percutaneous endovascular arterio-venous fistula: selection, mapping, creation, and follow up. Patient empowerment, education and involvement is required at each step. A dedicated training program, involving patients and the caregiver team is therefore needed. Additional research is required to confirm the benefit of the multidisciplinary team management in end-stage kidney disease patients.

Predialysis Vascular Access Placement and Catheter Use at Hemodialysis Initiation

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines encourage placement of an arteriovenous (AV) fistula in patients with advanced CKD to avoid initiation of hemodialysis with a central venous catheter. However, the relative merits of predialysis placement of an AV fistula or graft have been poorly studied.

METHODS

This study included 380 patients (mean age 59±14 years, 73% Black patients, 51% male) from a large academic medical center who underwent predialysis placement of an AV fistula (286) or AV graft (94). The study quantified three end points: time from access placement to initiation of dialysis, likelihood of starting hemodialysis without a catheter, and number of vascular access procedures before dialysis initiation.

RESULTS

The eGFR at access surgery was <10, 10-14, and ≥15 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 in 87 (23%), 179 (47%), and 114 (30%) patients, respectively. The median time from access surgery to hemodialysis initiation was 69, 156, and 429 days in patients with an eGFR of <10, 10-14, and ≥15 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 , respectively ( P < 0.001). Hemodialysis was initiated within 2 years of access surgery in 298 (78%) of the patients. Catheter-free hemodialysis initiation was higher in patients with an AV graft versus an AV fistula when the eGFR was <10 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 (88% versus 43%; odds ratio [OR], 9.10 [95% confidence interval, 2.74 to 26.4]) and when the eGFR was 10-14 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 (88% versus 54%; OR, 6.05 [2.35 to 15.0]) but similar when the eGFR was ≥15 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 (90% versus 75%; OR, 3.00 [0.48 to 34.9]). Patients undergoing an AV fistula were more likely to undergo an angioplasty (11% versus 0%, P < 0.001), surgical access revision (26% versus 8%, P < 0.001), a second access placement (16% versus 6%, P = 0.02), and a catheter insertion (32% versus 11%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with CKD undergoing vascular access surgery when their eGFR was <15 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 , catheter use at dialysis initiation was much less likely when an AV graft, rather than an AV fistula, was placed.

Vascular Access-Related Distal Ischemia Requiring Intervention: Frequency, Risk Factors, and Consequences

BACKGROUND

Distal ischemia is a rare complication in patients undergoing placement of an arteriovenous (AV) fistula or AV graft. There are limited studies on its frequency, risk factors, clinical consequences, or feasibility of subsequent access.

METHODS

A prospective vascular access database from a large academic medical center was queried retrospectively to identify 1498 patients (mean age 56±15 years, 48% female patients, 73% Black patients) undergoing placement of at least one vascular access from 2011 to 2020. For patients who developed access-related distal ischemia requiring surgical intervention, we determined the frequency of distal ischemia, clinical risk factors, and subsequent outcomes.

RESULTS

Severe access-related distal ischemia occurred in 28 patients (1.9%; 95% confidence interval, 1.3% to 2.7%). The frequency was 0.2% for forearm AV fistulas, 0.9% for upper arm AV fistulas, 2.4% for forearm AV grafts, 2.2% for upper arm AV grafts, and 2.8% for thigh AV grafts. Risk factors independently associated with distal ischemia included female sex (odds ratio [OR], 3.64 [95% confidence interval, 1.52 to 8.72]), peripheral vascular disease (OR, 6.28 [2.84 to 13.87]), and coronary artery disease (OR, 2.37 [1.08 to 5.23]). Surgical interventions included ligation, excision, plication (banding), and other surgical procedures. Five patients developed tissue necrosis. A subsequent AV graft was placed in 13 patients, of whom only one (8%) developed distal ischemia requiring intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Access-related distal ischemia requiring intervention was rare in this study and more common in women and patients with peripheral vascular disease or coronary artery disease. In some cases, a subsequent vascular access could be placed with a low likelihood of recurrent distal ischemia.

Effects of a More Selective Arteriovenous Fistula Strategy on Vascular Access Outcomes

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

The optimal choice of vascular access for patients undergoing hemodialysis-arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or arteriovenous graft (AVG)-remains controversial. In a pragmatic observational study of 692 patients, the authors found that among patients who initiated hemodialysis with a central vein catheter (CVC), a strategy that maximized AVF placement resulted in a higher frequency of access procedures and greater access management costs for patients who initially received an AVF than an AVG. A more selective policy that avoided AVF placement if an AVF was predicted to be at high risk of failure resulted in a lower frequency of access procedures and access costs in patients receiving an AVF versus an AVG. These findings suggest that clinicians should be more selective in placing AVFs because this approach improves vascular access outcomes.

BACKGROUND

The optimal choice of initial vascular access-arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or graft (AVG)-remains controversial, particularly in patients initiating hemodialysis with a central venous catheter (CVC).

METHODS

In a pragmatic observational study of patients who initiated hemodialysis with a CVC and subsequently received an AVF or AVG, we compared a less selective vascular access strategy of maximizing AVF creation (period 1; 408 patients in 2004 through 2012) with a more selective policy of avoiding AVF creation if failure was likely (period 2; 284 patients in 2013 through 2019). Prespecified end points included frequency of vascular access procedures, access management costs, and duration of catheter dependence. We also compared access outcomes in all patients with an initial AVF or AVG in the two periods.

RESULTS

An initial AVG placement was significantly more common in period 2 (41%) versus period 1 (28%). Frequency of all access procedures per 100 patient-years was significantly higher in patients with an initial AVF than an AVG in period 1 and lower in period 2. Median annual access management costs were significantly higher among patients with AVF ($10,642) versus patients with AVG ($6810) in period 1 but significantly lower in period 2 ($5481 versus $8253, respectively). Years of catheter dependence per 100 patient-years was three-fold higher in patients with AVF versus patients with AVG in period 1 (23.3 versus 8.1, respectively), but only 30% higher in period 2 (20.8 versus 16.0, respectively). When all patients were aggregated, the median annual access management cost was significantly lower in period 2 ($6757) than in period 1 ($9781).

CONCLUSIONS

A more selective approach to AVF placement reduces frequency of vascular access procedures and cost of access management.

Evaluation of hemodialysis vascular access involving multidisciplinary integration: Perspective from Latin America and Peru

The perspective of vascular access care in patients with end-stage renal disease has migrated from nephrology-centered or vascular surgery-centered care to multidisciplinary-focused patient-centered care. This new perspective should not only be theoretical but also have practical utility. A non-multidisciplinary focus can contribute to the low prevalence of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) in the population. Latin America has multiple health systems and the coordination of vascular access is heterogeneous. In Peru, there is a high prevalence of central venous catheter use with its associated complications, such as stenosis, thrombosis, infection, and recurrent hospitalizations in the context of fragmented care. However, in the last few years, there has been an effort to integrate the communication between vascular surgery, interventional radiology, and nephrology to improve vascular access care. In this review, we analyze the availability of care, the intervention, and the future directions from the experience of both perspectives.

De Novo Central Vein Stenosis in Hemodialysis Patients Following Initial Tunneled Central Vein Catheter Placement

Background

Central vein stenosis (CVS) is a common complication in hemodialysis patients following tunneled central venous catheter (CVC) insertion. Little is known about its incidence, association with patient characteristics, or relationship with duration of CVC placement. We systematically evaluated central vein stenosis in hemodialysis patients receiving their first CVC exchange at a large medical center.

Methods

All new hemodialysis patients underwent an ultrasound before their internal jugular tunneled CVC placement, to exclude venous stenosis or thrombosis. After the initial CVC insertion, if the patients were referred for CVC exchange due to dysfunction, a catheterogram/venogram was performed to assess for hemodynamically significant (≥50%) central vein stenosis. During a 5-year period (January 2016 to January 2021), we quantified the incidence of CVS in patients undergoing CVC exchange. We also evaluated the association of central vein stenosis with patient demographics, comorbidities, and duration of CVC dependence before exchange.

Results

During the study period, 273 patients underwent exchange of a tunneled internal jugular vein CVC preceded by a catheterogram/venogram. Hemodynamically significant CVS was observed in 36 patients (13%). CVS was not associated with patient age, sex, race, diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease, or CVC laterality. However, the frequency of CVS was associated with the duration of CVC dependence (26% versus 11% for CVC duration ≥6 versus <6 months: odds ratio (95% CI), 3.17 (1.45 to 6.97), P=0.003).

Conclusions

Among incident hemodialysis patients receiving their first tunneled internal jugular CVC exchange, the overall incidence of de novo hemodynamically significant central vein stenosis was 13%. The likelihood of CVS was substantially greater in patients with at least 6 months of CVC dependence.

Feasibility of Creation of an Endovascular Arteriovenous Fistula in Patients Undergoing Preoperative Vascular Mapping

Background

The first endovascular arteriovenous fistula (endoAVF) device (WavelinQ), a novel percutaneous technique of AVF creation, was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2018 and has been placed in a small number of United States patients on hemodialysis. It is unknown how often patients with advanced CKD have vascular anatomy suitable for WavelinQ creation. The goal of this study was to determine the proportion of patients with vascular anatomy suitable for WavelinQ creation and to assess patient characteristics associated with such suitability.

Methods

All patients referred for vascular access placement at a large academic medical center underwent standardized preoperative sonographic vascular mapping to assess suitability for an AVF. During a 2-year period (March 2019 to March 2021), we assessed the suitability of the vessels for creation of WavelinQ. We then compared the demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and vascular mapping measurements between patients who were or were not suitable for WavelinQ.

Results

During the study period, 437 patients underwent vessel mapping. Of these, 51% of patients were eligible for a surgical AVF, and 32% were eligible for a WavelinQ AVF; 63% of those suitable for a surgical AVF were also suitable for a WavelinQ AVF. Patients with a vascular anatomy suitable for WavelinQ were younger (age 55±15 versus 60±14 years, P=0.01) but similar in sex, race, diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease, and peripheral artery disease.

Conclusions

Among patients with CKD with vascular anatomy suitable for a surgical AVF, 63% are also suitable for a WavelinQ endoAVF. Older patients are less frequently suitable for WavelinQ.

Arteriovenous Fistula Nonmaturation: What's the Immune System Got to Do with It?

Background

Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) nonmaturation is a persistent problem, particularly among female and Black patients. Increasingly, the immune system has been recognized as an important contributor to vascular disease, but few studies have examined immune factors relative to AVF maturation outcomes. This study evaluated the association of serum panel reactive antibodies (PRA), a measure of immune system reactivity assessed in patients undergoing kidney transplant evaluation, with AVF nonmaturation.

Methods

We identified 132 patients at our institution who underwent surgical AVF placement between 2010-2019 and had PRA testing within 1 year of AVF creation. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association of patient demographic and clinical factors, class I and class II PRA levels, and preoperative arterial and venous diameters with AVF maturation outcomes.

Results

AVF nonmaturation was more likely in females than males (44% versus 20%, P=0.003) and in Black than white patients (40% versus 13%, P=0.001). Class II PRA was higher in females than males (12%±23% versus 4%±13%, P=0.02). In the multivariable model, AVF nonmaturation was associated with class II PRA (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.34 per 10% increase; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.04 to 1.82, P=0.02) and Black race (aOR, 3.34; 95% CI, 1.02 to 10.89, P=0.03), but not with patient sex or preoperative arterial or venous diameters.

Conclusions

The association of elevated class II PRA with AVF nonmaturation suggests the immune system may play a role in AVF maturation outcomes, especially among female patients.

Value of Immediate Post-Kidney Biopsy Ultrasound in Excluding Late Hemorrhagic Complications

BACKGROUND

Hemorrhage is the most serious potential complication of percutaneous kidney biopsy. Patients are typically observed for at least 6-8 hours after a kidney biopsy, with serial measurements of vital signs and hemoglobin to monitor for major hemorrhage. This study assessed whether an immediate postbiopsy ultrasound can reliably exclude delayed major hemorrhage.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcomes in 147 patients undergoing an outpatient native kidney biopsy with an 18-gauge needle at a large medical center during a 2.5-year period (January 2017 to June 2019). All patients underwent a standardized postbiopsy ultrasound to assess for active extravasation of blood. We extracted from the medical records vital signs and hemoglobin values obtained before the biopsy and at 2, 4, and 6 hours after the procedure. We ascertained whether any patients with a negative postbiopsy ultrasound developed a delayed major hemorrhage.

RESULTS

Each patient underwent two or three biopsy passes. The mean patient age was 48±17 years, 49% were female, 37% were black, 53% had hypertension, and 16% had diabetes. Of the 142 patients without evidence of active extravasation on ultrasound, the BP, heart rate, and hemoglobin remained stable during 6 hours of observation. All were discharged after 6 hours, and none had a late bleeding complication.

CONCLUSIONS

If the immediate postkidney biopsy ultrasound does not show active bleeding, the patient is extremely unlikely to develop a late major hemorrhagic complication (negative predictive value, 100%). Such patients can be discharged home safely after a 2-hour observation, thereby simplifying their management.

Early Predictors of Arteriovenous Fistula Maturation: A Novel Perspective on an Enduring Problem

BACKGROUND

Preoperative ultrasound mapping is routinely used to select vessels meeting minimal threshold diameters for surgical arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation but fails to improve AVF maturation rates. This suggests a need to reassess the preoperative ultrasound criteria used to optimize AVF maturation.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 300 catheter-dependent patients on hemodialysis with a new AVF created between 2010 and 2016. We then evaluated the associations of preoperative vascular measurements and hemodynamic factors with unassisted AVF maturation (successful use for dialysis without prior intervention) and overall maturation (successful use with or without prior intervention). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify preoperative factors associated with unassisted and overall AVF maturation.

RESULTS

Unassisted AVF maturation associated with preoperative arterial diameter (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.50 per 1-mm increase; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.23 to 1.83), preoperative systolic BP (aOR, 1.16 per 10-mm Hg increase; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.28), and left ventricular ejection fraction (aOR, 1.07 per 5% increase; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.13). Overall AVF maturation associated with preoperative arterial diameter (aOR, 1.36 per 1-mm increase; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.66) and preoperative systolic BP (aOR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.30). Using receiver operating curves, the combination of preoperative arterial diameter, systolic BP, and left ventricular ejection fraction was fairly predictive of unassisted maturation (area under the curve, 0.69). Patient age, sex, race, diabetes, vascular disease, obesity, and AVF location were not associated with maturation.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative arterial diameter may be an under-recognized predictor of AVF maturation. Further study evaluating the effect of preoperative arterial diameter and other hemodynamic factors on AVF maturation is needed.

Complications of Hemodialysis Catheter Bloodstream Infections: Impact of Infecting Organism

BACKGROUND

Catheter-related bloodstream infections -(CRBSI) are associated with a high burden of morbidity and mortality, but the impact of infecting organism on clinical outcomes has been poorly studied.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis of a prospective vascular access database from a large academic dialysis center investigated whether the organism type affected the clinical presentation or complications of CRBSI.

RESULTS

Among 339 patients with suspected CRBSI, an alternate source of infection was identified in 50 (15%). Of 289 patients with CRBSI, 249 grew a single organism and 40 were polymicrobial. Fever and/or rigors were presenting signs in ≥90% of patients with Staphylococcus aureus or Gram-negative CRBSI, but only 61% of Staphylococcus epidermidis infections (p < 0.001). Hospitalization occurred in 67% of patients with S. aureus CRBSI versus 34% of those with S. epidermidis and 40% of those with a Gram-negative bacteria (p < 0.001). Admission to the intensive care unit was required in 14, 9, and 2% (p = 0.06); metastatic infection occurred in 10, 4, and 4% (p = 0.42); and median length of stay among patients admitted to the hospital was 4, 4, and 5.5 days (p = 0.60), respectively. Death due to CRBSI occurred in only 1% of patients with CRBSI.

CONCLUSION

CRBSI is confirmed in 85% of catheter-dependent hemodialysis patients in whom it is suspected. S. epidermidis CRBSI tends to present with atypical symptoms. S. aureus CRBSI is more likely to require hospitalization or intensive care admission. Metastatic infection is relatively uncommon, and death due to CRBSI is rare.

Current state of dialysis access management in Korea

The prevalence rate and the incidence rate of hemodialysis and functioning kidney transplant recipients have continuously increased; on the contrary, those of peritoneal dialysis have continuously decreased since 2006. Dialysis patients have been getting older and have been maintained on dialysis longer. Diabetic nephropathy was the leading cause of end stage renal disease. The type of hemodialysis vascular access has been stable during the last 5 years (arteriovenous fistulas 76%, arteriovenous grafts 16%, central venous catheters 8% at 2016). Peritoneal dialysis catheter was mostly inserted surgically (67%), and swan neck straight tip peritoneal dialysis catheter was the most commonly used (48%). Vascular access was managed by radiologists and surgeons, and the management was fragmented among them in the past. However, since the nephrologists became interested in and knowledgeable about the vascular access, they began to play roles in vascular access management. Vascular access has been mostly created by vascular surgeons (≈60%); tunneled central venous hemodialysis catheter insertion and endovascular intervention such as percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and thrombectomy have been mostly performed by radiologists (≈70%). Tunneled hemodialysis catheter insertion and endovascular intervention by nephrologists have slowly but consistently increased. Recently, the number of central venous hemodialysis catheter insertion has decreased, and tunneled hemodialysis catheter has been inserted more than non-tunneled hemodialysis catheter, indicating that vascular access has been created timely and the vascular access team has been educated about and following international guidelines.

A systematic follow-up protocol achieving a low hemodialysis graft thrombosis rate

INTRODUCTION

Graft is an alternative to native arteriovenous fistula to ensure permanent vascular access in hemodialysis patients. The most common complication is significant stenosis, which frequently causes thrombosis and graft loss. Periodic monitoring and surveillance with elective correction of stenotic lesions can prolong graft survival.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the effect of early diagnosis of significant stenosis on the rate of thrombosis and graft patency.

METHODS

Retrospective, observational study of a cohort of 86 prevalent patients undergoing hemodialysis with a graft as their vascular access. We applied a systematic follow-up protocol of 115 grafts based on various screening methods of monitoring (clinical monitoring, pre-pump arterial pressure, dynamic venous pressure, percentage of recirculation, and dose of dialysis) in conjunction with surveillance (normalized intra-access venous pressure and access flow). The annual rates of thrombosis, and primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency were assessed.

RESULTS

The incidence of significant stenosis and thrombosis was 57.4% (65/115) and 39.0% (45/115), respectively. Of all screening procedures, normalized intra-access venous pressure was the best predictor of significant stenosis (hazards ratio, 7.71; 95% confidence interval, 3.06-19.46). The annual rate of thrombosis fluctuated from 0 to 0.26 thromboses/patient/year, with an average rate of 0.14 thromboses/patient/year. Primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency were 74%/79%/82%, 50%/60%/66%, and 23%/35%/37% at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of a systematic graft follow-up protocol combined with monitoring and surveillance enabled early diagnosis and elective correction of significant stenosis, prolonged graft patency, and a low thrombosis rate.

Postoperative Ultrasound, Unassisted Maturation, and Subsequent Primary Patency of Arteriovenous Fistulas

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Postoperative ultrasound is commonly used to assess arteriovenous fistula (AVF) maturation for hemodialysis, but its utility for predicting unassisted AVF maturation or primary AVF patency for hemodialysis has not been well defined. This study assessed the predictive value of postoperative AVF ultrasound measurements for these clinical AVF outcomes.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

We queried a prospective vascular access database to identify 246 patients on catheter-dependent hemodialysis who underwent AVF creation between 2010 and 2016 and obtained a postoperative ultrasound within 90 days. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association of clinical characteristics and postoperative ultrasound measurements with unassisted AVF maturation. A receiver operating characteristic curve estimated the predictive value of these factors for unassisted AVF maturation. Finally, multivariable survival analysis was used to identify factors associated with primary AVF patency in patients with unassisted AVF maturation.

RESULTS

Unassisted AVF maturation occurred in 121 out of 246 patients (49%), assisted maturation in 55 patients (22%), and failure to mature in 70 patients (28%). Using multivariable logistic regression, unassisted AVF maturation was associated with AVF blood flow (odds ratio [OR], 1.30; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.18 to 1.45 per 100 ml/min increase; P<0.001), forearm location (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.08 to 1.78; P=0.21), presence of stenosis (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.88; P=0.02); AVF depth (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.00 per 1 mm increase; P=0.05), and AVF location interaction with depth (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.84; P=0.02). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, using all these factors, was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.79 to 0.89; P<0.001). Primary AVF patency in patients with unassisted maturation was associated only with AVF diameter (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.94 per 1 mm increase; P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Unassisted AVF maturation is predicted by AVF blood flow, location, depth, and stenosis. AVF patency after unassisted maturation is predicted only by the postoperative AVF diameter.

Spanish Clinical Guidelines on Vascular Access for Haemodialysis

Vascular access for haemodialysis is key in renal patients both due to its associated morbidity and mortality and due to its impact on quality of life. The process, from the creation and maintenance of vascular access to the treatment of its complications, represents a challenge when it comes to decision-making, due to the complexity of the existing disease and the diversity of the specialities involved. With a view to finding a common approach, the Spanish Multidisciplinary Group on Vascular Access (GEMAV), which includes experts from the five scientific societies involved (nephrology [S.E.N.], vascular surgery [SEACV], vascular and interventional radiology [SERAM-SERVEI], infectious diseases [SEIMC] and nephrology nursing [SEDEN]), along with the methodological support of the Cochrane Center, has updated the Guidelines on Vascular Access for Haemodialysis, published in 2005. These guidelines maintain a similar structure, in that they review the evidence without compromising the educational aspects. However, on one hand, they provide an update to methodology development following the guidelines of the GRADE system in order to translate this systematic review of evidence into recommendations that facilitate decision-making in routine clinical practice, and, on the other hand, the guidelines establish quality indicators which make it possible to monitor the quality of healthcare.

Functional Patency of Autogenous AV Fistulas for Hemodialysis

Background

Although AV fistulas are the preferred access for hemodialysis and have low complication rates, failure to function remains high and time to first dialysis may be several months.

Methods

Data from a Computerized Patient Record System of patients undergoing AV fistula from October 2000 to March 2006 were reviewed for type of fistula, interval from AV fistula construction to first hemodialysis, patency period, and complication rate.

Results

129 patients were identified who underwent 155 autogenous AV fistula constructions. The average age was 62.1 (range 40–84) years old. 114 radiocephalic and 41 brachiocephalic fistulas were performed. 57 (50%) radiocephalic fistulas allowed successful hemodialysis after an average length of 13±5 weeks with a primary patency of 13±4 months. 24 (42%) fistulas subsequently thrombosed, 7 (12%) developed fistula stenosis, and 2 (4%) developed steal syndrome. 28 (68%) brachiocephalic fistulas reached successful hemodialysis after 6±2 weeks with a primary patency of 16±7 months. Eleven (42%) of the brachiocephalic fistulas that reached hemodialysis remained patent while four (15%) thrombosed. Two (8%) brachiocephalic fistulas thrombosed before reaching hemodialysis. There were two incidences (5%) of steal syndrome in the brachiocephalic group with one case being severe leading to tissue loss in the hand.

Conclusion

Brachiocephalic fistulas were superior to radiocephalic in both time to maturity, primary patency, and functional primary patency. Brachiocephalic fistulas had a higher maturation rate and were less likely to fail once hemodialysis began. Vascular surgeons should develop better patient selection to predict which fistulas will function successfully rather than risk complications of prolonged central catheters.

Comparison of urea recirculation and thermodilution for monitoring of vascular access in patients undergoing hemodialysis

Introduction

It is important to monitor vascular access in patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease receiving hemodialysis. Access recirculation can help to detect a need for intervention.

Objectives:

To compare urea recirculation with recirculation by thermodilution using blood temperature monitoring to predict a need for intervention of vascular access over a 6-month period.

Methods:

We analyzed urea recirculation and blood temperature monitoring simultaneously in 61 patients undergoing hemodialysis. During the 6-month follow-up, we recorded all cases of angioplasty or surgery (thrombectomy or reanastomosis). In line with previous studies, we considered a value to be positive when urea recirculation was >10% and blood temperature monitoring >15%. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed.

Results:

Mean urea recirculation was 9.5% ± 6.6% and mean blood temperature monitoring 12.9% ± 4.3% (p = 0.001). Urea recirculation >10% had a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 78%. Blood temperature monitoring >15% had a sensitivity of 33% and specificity of 85%. During follow-up, 25% of patients developed need for intervention of vascular access. We found an association between vascular access dysfunction and urea recirculation. The Kaplan–Meier analysis confirmed an association between urea recirculation and risk of vascular access dysfunction (log rank = 17.2; p = 0.001). We were unable to confirm this association with blood temperature monitoring (log rank = 0.879; p = 0.656).

Conclusion:

Urea recirculation is better predictor of vascular access dysfunction than thermodilution.

Evaluation of Dialysis Access Care by Means of Process Quality Indicators

Improvement of dialysis access management depends on technical skill but also on effective choice, construction, monitoring and revision of the access. Surgical procedure is only one step of a complex course, beginning with the referral of patients to nephrologists.

Using two process quality indicators, we describe the evolution of access management at our centre, where access surgery and access-related activities are performed by nephrologist. The first process indicator is based on the prevalence of temporary access at first dialysis (TA1st) in end stage renal disease ESRD patients, the second one measures the prevalence of permanent central venous catheters (%CVC) in dialysis population.

TA1st increased to 27.1% in 1999, more than twofold compared to the previous year. There was also an increase in %CVC from 20.6 to 26.3%. Native access remained the most utilised, well above 70% of dialysis patients.

Our process monitoring suggests a rapid worsening of late referral, as indicated by the increasing use of temporary catheters at the beginning of chronic dialysis. Increasing surgical activity and diagnostic procedures were only partly effective in containing the rise in CVC.

Venous sparing, early referral, Continuous Quality Improvement and a multiprofessional access-team coordinated by a nephrologist could be the key-elements in facing the never-ending-story of dialysis vascular access.

The Clinical and Economic Effect of Vascular Access Selection in Patients Initiating Hemodialysis with a Catheter

Patients in the United States frequently initiate hemodialysis with a central venous catheter (CVC) and subsequently undergo placement of a new arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or arteriovenous graft (AVG). Little is known about the clinical and economic effects of initial vascular access choice. We identified 479 patients starting hemodialysis with a CVC at a large medical center (during 2004-2012) who subsequently had an AVF (n=295) or AVG (n=105) placed or no arteriovenous access (CVC group, n=71). Compared with patients receiving an AVG, those receiving an AVF had more frequent surgical access procedures per year (1.01 [95% confidence interval, 0.95 to 1.08] versus 0.62 [95% confidence interval, 0.55 to 0.70]; P<0.001) but a similar frequency of percutaneous access procedures per year. Patients receiving an AVF had a higher median annual cost (interquartile range) of surgical access procedures than those receiving an AVG ($4857 [$2523-$8835] versus $2819 [$1411-$4274]; P<0.001), whereas the annual cost of percutaneous access procedures was similar in both groups. The AVF group had a higher median overall annual access-related cost than the AVG group ($10,642 [$5406-$19,878] versus $6810 [$3718-$13,651]; P=0.001) after controlling for patient age, sex, race, and diabetes. The CVC group had the highest median annual overall access-related cost ($28,709 [$11,793-$66,917]; P<0.001), largely attributable to the high frequency of hospitalizations due to catheter-related bacteremia. In conclusion, among patients initiating hemodialysis with a CVC, the annual cost of access-related procedures and complications is higher in patients who initially receive an AVF versus an AVG.

Fistula First Initiative: Historical Impact on Vascular Access Practice Patterns and Influence on Future Vascular Access Care

The vascular access is the lifeline for the hemodialysis patient. In the United States, the Fistula First Breakthrough Initiative (FFBI) has been influential in improving use of arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) in prevalent hemodialysis patients. Currently, prevalent AVF rates are near the goal of 66% set forth by the original FFBI. However, central venous catheter (CVC) rates remain very high in the United States in patients initiating hemodialysis, nearly exceeding 80%. A new direction of the of the FFBI has focused on strategies to reduce CVC use, and subsequently the FFBI has now been renamed the "Fistula First-Catheter Last Initiative". However, an AVF may not be the best vascular access in all hemodialysis patients, and arteriovenous grafts (AVG) and CVCs may be appropriate and the best access for a subset of hemodialysis patients. Unfortunately, there still remains very little emphasis within vascular access initiatives and guidelines directed towards evaluation of the individual patient context, specifically patients with poor long-term prognoses and short life expectancies, patients with multiple comorbidities, patients who are more likely to die than reach end stage renal disease (ESRD), and patients of elderly age with impaired physical and cognitive function. Given the complexity of medical and social issues in advanced CKD and ESRD patients, planning, selection, and placement of the most appropriate vascular access are ideally managed within a multidisciplinary setting and requires consideration of several factors including national vascular access guidelines. Thus, the evolution of the FFBI should underscore the need for multidisciplinary health teams with a major emphasis placed on "the right access for the right patient" and improving the patient's overall quality of life.

Sonography of Arteriovenous Fistulas and Grafts

Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) and arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) are the vascular accesses of choice for long-term hemodialysis. Strategies to establish and maintain functioning AVFs and AVGs are essential. In addition to clinical evaluation, ultrasound plays a critical role in the evaluation and maintenance of AVFs and AVGs. AVFs have a high rate of failure to mature which can be reliably diagnosed with ultrasound. Treatable etiologies of the failure to mature can often be diagnosed with ultrasound. Causes of secondary AVG failure can also be diagnosed with ultrasound and treated. AVGs have a relatively short functional life expectancy due to a high rate of AVG thrombosis. Ultrasound is a safe, noninvasive way to diagnose vascular stenosis in both AVFs and AVGs prior to thrombosis, potentially saving the access. Routine surveillance ultrasound of asymptomatic AVFs and AVGs is controversial with conflicting studies on its benefit. Routine surveillance ultrasound of AVFs and AVGs is not common practice.

Arteriovenous Grafts: Much Maligned But in Need of Reconsideration?

There are substantial variations in arteriovenous fistula (AVF) use among hemodialysis patients in different countries, in different regions of the U.S., and even in different hemodialysis units within a single metropolitan area. These variations persist after adjustment for patient demographics and comorbidities, suggesting that practice patterns play a major role in determining the frequency of AVF use. These observations led to vascular access guidelines urging nephrologists and surgeons to increase AVF creation in patients with chronic kidney disease. Over the past 20 years, as clinicians have adopted these guidelines, the prevalence of AVF use in hemodialysis patients has increased substantially. At the same time, clinicians have recognized important limitations of an unwavering "Fistula First" approach. First, a substantial proportion of AVFs fail to mature even when routine preoperative vascular mapping is used, leading to prolonged catheter dependence. Second, certain patient subgroups are at high risk for AVF nonmaturation. Third, nonmaturing AVFs frequently require interventions to promote their maturation. Fourth, AVFs that require such interventions have shortened cumulative patency. Fifth, arteriovenous grafts (AVG) have several advantages over AVFs, including lower primary failure rates, fewer interventions prior to successful cannulation, and shorter duration of catheter dependence with its associated risk of bacteremia. All these observations have led nephrologists to propose an individualized approach to vascular access, with AVG being preferred in patients who initiate hemodialysis with a catheter, particularly if they are at high risk for AVF nonmaturation and have a relatively short life expectancy.

Predictors of Initiation for Predialysis Arteriovenous Fistula

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The optimal timing of predialysis arteriovenous fistula surgery remains uncertain. We evaluated factors associated with hemodialysis initiation in patients undergoing predialysis arteriovenous fistula surgery and derived a model to predict future initiation of dialysis.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Our study retrospectively identified 308 patients undergoing predialysis arteriovenous fistula creation at a large medical center in 2006-2012 to determine whether they initiated hemodialysis. Multiple variable logistic regression analyzed which demographic and clinical factors predicted initiation of dialysis within 2 years of arteriovenous fistula surgery. A receiver operating characteristic area under the curve was used to quantify the predictive value of preoperative factors on the likelihood of initiating hemodialysis within 2 years.

RESULTS

Overall, hemodialysis was initiated within 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years in 119 (39%), 175 (57%), and 211 (68%) patients, respectively. Using multiple variable logistic regression, four factors were associated with hemodialysis initiation at 2 years: eGFR at access surgery (odds ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.31 to 0.64 per 5 ml/min per 1.73 m2; P<0.001), diabetes (odds ratio, 2.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.22 to 5.15; P=0.003), GFR trajectory (odds ratio, 1.54; 95% confidence interval, 1.09 to 2.17 per 3 ml/min per 1.73 m2 per year; P=0.01), and spot urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (odds ratio, 1.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.14 to 1.71 per 1 U; P<0.001). eGFR alone had a moderate predictive value for dialysis initiation (area under the curve =0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.63 to 0.76; P<0.001), whereas the full model had a higher predictive value (area under the curve =0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.77 to 0.88; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The likelihood of initiating hemodialysis within 2 years of predialysis arteriovenous fistula surgery is associated with eGFR at access surgery, diabetes, GFR trajectory, and magnitude of proteinuria. The combined use of all four variables improves the ability to predict future hemodialysis compared with the use of eGFR alone.

Outcomes of arteriovenous fistulas and grafts with or without intervention before successful use

OBJECTIVE

Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are considered superior to arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) because of longer secondary patency after successful cannulation for dialysis. We evaluated whether access interventions before successful cannulation affect the relative longevity of AVFs and AVGs after successful use.

METHODS

This retrospective study of a prospective database identified patients who initiated dialysis with a catheter and subsequently had a permanent access (289 AVFs and 310 AVGs) placed between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2011, and were successfully cannulated for dialysis at a large medical center. Patients were monitored until June 30, 2014, and we evaluated the clinical outcomes (secondary patency and frequency of interventions) of the vascular accesses.

RESULTS

An intervention before successful cannulation was required more frequently with AVFs than with AVGs (50.5% vs 17.7%; odds ratio, 4.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.26-6.86; P < .0001). Compared with AVFs that matured without interventions, those that required intervention had shorter secondary patency after successful cannulation (hazard ratio, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.30-2.60; P < .0001) and required more interventions per year after successful use (rate ratio [RR], 1.81; 95% CI, 1.49-2.20; P < .0001). Similarly, AVGs that required intervention before successful cannulation had shorter secondary patency than those without prior intervention (odds ratio, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.52-4.02; P < .0001) and required more interventions per year after successful use (RR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.27-1.74; P < .0001). AVFs requiring intervention before maturation had inferior secondary patency compared with AVGs that were cannulated without prior intervention (hazard ratio, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.08-2.01; P = .01), but required fewer annual interventions after successful use (RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.49-0.66; P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The patency advantage of AVFs over AVGs is no longer evident in patients requiring an AVF intervention before successful cannulation, but the AVFs require fewer interventions after successful use.

Effect of a Rapid Clinical Protocol to the Conversion from Central Venous Hemodialysis Catheter to Arteriovenous Access

Purpose

Evaluation of the rapid conversion protocol that includes an ambulatory dialysis access center (DAC), and a three-step clinical pathway, to the conversion rate from central venous hemodialysis (HD) catheter to functioning arteriovenous (AV) access.

Methods

Prospective data were collected on 97 consecutive catheter-dependent HD patients. DAC is defined as an ambulatory unit, able to accommodate clinic visits, ultrasound examinations, surgical, interventional and hybrid procedures. Step I: initial evaluation, vein mapping and creation of AV access. Step II: clinical evaluation in two weeks and if failure identified, secondary procedure to restore function. Step III: evaluation in four weeks after creation, and additional procedure to promote maturation if indicated. The success rate, time to conversion and time to catheter removal were recorded.

Results

From the 97 consecutive referred patients, eight patients were excluded. From the remaining 89 patients, 99% were successfully converted to AV access. Seventy-three percent of the patients were converted to native arteriovenous fistulae and 27% of the patients to prosthetic arteriovenous shunts. The median time from creation to HD catheter removal was 63 (SD 41) days. Fifty-two percent of the patients required at least one additional secondary procedure to accomplish successful conversion

Conclusions

High rates of timely conversion from catheter to AV access, primarily AV fistulae, can be accomplished within the context of the rapid conversion protocol.

Preoperative arterial microcalcification and clinical outcomes of arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) often fail to mature, but the mechanism of AVF nonmaturation is poorly understood. Arterial microcalcification is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and may limit vascular dilatation, thereby contributing to early postoperative juxta-anastomotic AVF stenosis and impaired AVF maturation. This study evaluated whether preexisting arterial microcalcification adversely affects AVF outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

127 patients with CKD undergoing AVF surgery at a large academic medical center.

PREDICTORS

Preexisting arterial microcalcification (≥1% of media area) assessed independently by von Kossa stains of arterial specimens obtained during AVF surgery and by preoperative ultrasound.

OUTCOMES

Juxta-anastomotic AVF stenosis (ascertained by ultrasound obtained 4-6 weeks postoperatively), AVF nonmaturation (inability to cannulate with 2 needles with dialysis blood flow ≥ 300mL/min for ≥6 sessions in 1 month within 6 months of AVF creation), and duration of primary unassisted AVF survival after successful use (time to first intervention).

RESULTS

Arterial microcalcification was present by histologic evaluation in 40% of patients undergoing AVF surgery. The frequency of a postoperative juxta-anastomotic AVF stenosis was similar in patients with or without preexisting arterial microcalcification (32% vs 42%; OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.28-1.52; P=0.3). AVF nonmaturation was observed in 29%, 33%, 33%, and 33% of patients with <1%, 1% to 4.9%, 5% to 9.9%, and ≥10% arterial microcalcification, respectively (P=0.9). Sonographic arterial microcalcification was found in 39% of patients and was associated with histologic calcification (P=0.001), but did not predict AVF nonmaturation. Finally, among AVFs that matured, unassisted AVF maturation (time to first intervention) was similar for patients with and without preexisting arterial microcalcification (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.35-1.21; P=0.2).

LIMITATIONS

Single-center study.

CONCLUSIONS

Arterial microcalcification is common in patients with advanced CKD, but does not explain postoperative AVF stenosis, AVF nonmaturation, or AVF failure after successful cannulation.

A Patient with Recurrent Arteriovenous Graft Thrombosis

Arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) are prone to frequent thrombosis that is superimposed on underlying hemodynamically significant stenosis, most commonly at the graft-vein anastomosis. There has been great interest in detecting AVG stenosis in a timely fashion and performing preemptive angioplasty, in the belief that this will prevent AVG thrombosis. Three surveillance methods (static dialysis venous pressure, flow monitoring, and duplex ultrasound) can detect AVG stenosis. Whereas observational studies have reported that surveillance with preemptive angioplasty substantially reduces AVG thrombosis, randomized clinical trials have failed to confirm such a benefit. There is a high frequency of early AVG restenosis after angioplasty caused by aggressive neointimal hyperplasia resulting from vascular injury. Stent grafts prevent AVG restenosis better than balloon angioplasty, but they do not prevent AVG thrombosis. Several pharmacologic interventions to prevent AVG failure have been evaluated in randomized clinical trials. Anticoagulation or aspirin plus clopidogrel do not prevent AVG thrombosis, but increase hemorrhagic events. Treatment of hyperhomocysteinemia does not prevent AVG thrombosis. Dipyridamole plus aspirin modestly decreases AVG stenosis or thrombosis. Fish oil substantially decreases the frequency of AVG stenosis and thrombosis. In patients who have exhausted all options for vascular access in the upper extremities, thigh AVGs are a superior option to tunneled internal jugular vein central vein catheters (CVCs). An immediate-use AVG is a reasonable option in patients with recurrent CVC dysfunction or infection. Tunneled femoral CVCs have much worse survival than internal jugular CVCs.

Clinical outcomes after arteriovenous fistula creation in chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Optimal timing of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) surgery in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is uncertain.

METHODS

A single-centre retrospective study of pre-dialysis CKD patients having first AVF surgery.

RESULTS

The median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at the time of AVF surgery in 100 patients was 15 ml/min/1.73 m(2), with patients classified as having an early AVF if eGFR was >15 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (n = 46) or a late AVF if eGFR was ≤15 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (n = 54). In the eGFR ≤15 group, 81% of patients started haemodialysis (HD), compared with 63% of the eGFR >15 patients (p = 0.04). The median time to starting HD was 30.3 months in the eGFR >15 group compared to 10.7 months for the eGFR ≤15 group (log rank p = 0.018). There were no differences in the requirements for a dialysis catheter (eGFR >15 24% vs. eGFR ≤15 11%, p = 0.20) or additional access procedures between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

AVF surgery with an eGFR >15 ml/min/1.73 m(2) was associated with a higher risk of AVF non-use and a more prolonged time to the need for HD.

Effect of the time to intervention on the outcome of thrombosed dialysis access grafts managed percutaneously

PURPOSE

We aimed to investigate the effect of the time interval from the clinical presentation of a thrombosed dialysis access graft to intervention on procedure success.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Records from two academic institutions for patients who underwent percutaneous thrombectomy of occluded surgical hemodialysis graft access sites in interventional radiology from 2006 to 2011 were reviewed retrospectively. The following data were recorded: gender, age, time and date of the initial request for a thrombectomy and the procedure, age of the surgical access, angiographic outcome, and clinical outcome (successful or unsuccessful postinterventional dialysis). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to evaluate whether the time to intervention significantly affected the study endpoint.

RESULTS

In total, 268 percutaneous thrombectomies were performed in 139 patients. Of these 224 (83.5%) were categorized as successful and 44 (16.4%) as unsuccessful. The time to intervention was 19.9±30.1 vs. 22±35 hours for successful and unsuccessful procedures, respectively. The difference between the two was not significant, and there were also no significant differences in covariate distributions between successful and unsuccessful outcomes.

CONCLUSION

During the first 72 hours following clinical presentation of a thrombosed dialysis access graft, time to intervention may be considered independent of procedure outcome.

Vascular access for hemodialysis: postoperative evaluation and function monitoring

Vascular access (VA) survival is a crucial issue associated with morbidity and mortality of patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. The development of stenosis is the major factor that leads to VA failure. Strategies for early detection of lesions within a VA system before serious complications arise are therefore crucial. The implementation of a VA surveillance program could lead to timely detection of VA dysfunction and referral for correction, reduction in central venous catheter use and decrease in hospitalization and VA-related cost. Suggested methods for arteriovenous fistulae and grafts surveillance include blood flow measurement, static pressure evaluation and duplex ultrasonography. Physical examination is an accepted method in contrast to nonstandardized dynamic pressure measurement for grafts. Access recirculation (not urea based) and dynamic pressure measurements are accepted methods for fistulae. Decreasing URR or Kt/V (otherwise unexplained) and increased (negative) arterial pressure in the dialysis machine are methods of limited sensitivity and specificity for both fistulae and grafts. Measurement of access blood flow has been proposed as the gold standard for the screening of all types of VA. Access flow can be measured by various techniques which are direct or indirect. Several studies about VA surveillance programs have demonstrated conflicting results. Larger, randomized controlled trials need to be carried out in order to clarify whether surveillance programs are necessary and which is the best surveillance strategy for each type of VA.

Correlation of pre-existing vascular pathology with arteriovenous graft outcomes in hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) are prone to neointimal hyperplasia leading to AVG failure. We hypothesized that pre-existing pathologic abnormalities of the vessels used to create AVGs (including venous intimal hyperplasia, arterial intimal hyperplasia, arterial medial fibrosis, and arterial calcification) are associated with inferior AVG survival.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing placement of a new AVG at a large medical center who had vascular specimens obtained at the time of surgery (n = 76).

PREDICTOR

Maximal intimal thickness of the arterial and venous intima, arterial medial fibrosis, and arterial medial calcification.

OUTCOME & MEASUREMENTS

Unassisted primary AVG survival (time to first intervention) and frequency of AVG interventions.

RESULTS

55 patients (72%) underwent interventions and 148 graft interventions occurred during 89.9 years of follow-up (1.65 interventions per graft-year). Unassisted primary AVG survival was not associated significantly with arterial intimal thickness (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.40-1.27; P = 0.3), venous intimal thickness (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.37-1.10; P = 0.1), severe arterial medial fibrosis (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.32-1.06; P = 0.6), or severe arterial calcification (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.37-1.31; P = 0.3). The frequency of AVG interventions per year was associated inversely with arterial intimal thickness (relative risk [RR], 1.99; 95% CI, 1.16-3.42; P < 0.001 for thickness <10 vs. >25 μm), venous intimal thickness (RR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.39-3.20; P < 0.001 for thickness <5 vs. >10 μm), arterial medial fibrosis (RR, 3.17; 95% CI, 1.96-5.13; P < 0.001 for fibrosis <70% vs. ≥70%), and arterial calcification (RR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.31-3.43; P = 0.001 for <10% vs. ≥10% calcification).

LIMITATIONS

Single-center study. Study may be underpowered to demonstrate differences in unassisted primary AVG survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-existing vascular pathologic abnormalities in patients with chronic kidney disease may not be associated significantly with unassisted primary AVG survival. However, vascular intimal hyperplasia, arterial medial fibrosis, and arterial calcification may be associated with a decreased frequency of AVG interventions.

Long-term outcomes of arteriovenous thigh grafts in hemodialysis patients: a comparison with tunneled dialysis catheters

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Arteriovenous thigh grafts are a potential vascular access option in hemodialysis patients who have exhausted all upper-limb sites. This study compared the outcomes of thigh grafts with outcomes obtained with dialysis catheters.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

A prospective vascular access database was queried to identify 209 thigh grafts placed from January 1, 2003, to June 30, 2011. The following were calculated: secondary graft survival (from graft creation to permanent failure), assisted primary graft survival (from graft creation to first thrombosis), and infection-free graft survival (from graft creation to first graft infection). Graft outcomes were compared with those observed with 472 tunneled internal jugular dialysis catheters.

RESULTS

The median duration of patient follow-up was 340 days for grafts and 91 days for catheters. The surgical technical failure rate of thigh grafts was 8.1% and was higher in patients with vascular disease (hazard ratio [HR], 2.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-8.04; P=0.03). Secondary and assisted primary graft survival rates at 1, 2, and 5 years were 62%, 54%, and 38% and 38%, 27%, and 17%, respectively. Infection-free graft survival rates at 1, 2, and 5 years were 79%, 73%, and 61%. Secondary survival was much worse for dialysis catheters than thigh grafts (HR, 4.44; 95% CI, 3.65-5.22; P<0.001). Likewise, infection-free survival was far worse for catheters than for thigh grafts (HR, 3.77; 95% CI, 2.80-4.82; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Thigh grafts are a viable vascular option in patients who have exhausted upper-extremity options. Outcomes with thigh grafts are superior to those obtained with dialysis catheters.

Association of hemodialysis central venous catheter use with ipsilateral arteriovenous vascular access survival

BACKGROUND

Central venous catheters frequently are used for hemodialysis vascular access while patients await placement and maturation of an arteriovenous fistula or graft. Catheters may cause central vein stenosis, which can adversely affect vascular access outcomes. We compared vascular access outcomes in patients with a history of ipsilateral and contralateral dialysis catheters.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of a prospective computerized vascular access database.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Patients at a large medical center who initiated hemodialysis therapy with a catheter and subsequently received a fistula (n = 233) or graft (n = 89).

PREDICTOR

History of central venous catheter placement ipsilateral versus contralateral to the arteriovenous fistula or graft.

OUTCOME & MEASUREMENTS

Primary access failure (access never suitable for dialysis) and cumulative access survival (time from successful cannulation until permanent access failure).

RESULTS

For patients receiving a fistula, the primary failure rate was similar for those with ipsilateral and contralateral catheters (50% vs 53%; HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.71-1.26; P = 0.7), and time to fistula maturation was similar (101 ± 41 vs 107 ± 39 days; P = 0.5). However, cumulative fistula survival was inferior in patients with ipsilateral catheters (HR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.33-7.33; P = 0.009). For patients receiving a graft, the primary failure rate was similar for those with ipsilateral and contralateral catheters (35% vs 38%; HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.49-1.73; P = 0.8), but cumulative graft survival tended to be shorter with ipsilateral catheters (HR, 2.04; 95% CI, 0.92-5.38; P = 0.07).

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective analysis, single medical center.

CONCLUSIONS

The primary failure rate of fistulas and grafts is not affected by the presence of an ipsilateral catheter. However, cumulative access survival is inferior in patients with prior ipsilateral catheters. Avoidance of ipsilateral catheters may improve long-term vascular access survival.

Diagnosis of arteriovenous fistula dysfunction

Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) dysfunction remains a major contributor to the morbidity and mortality of hemodialysis patients. The failure of a newly created AVF to mature and development of stenosis in an established AVF are two common clinical predicaments. The goal is to identify a dysfunctional AVF early enough to intervene in a timely manner to either assist with the maturation process or to prevent thrombosis. The currently available tools in our armamentarium include clinical evaluation, physical examination of the AVF, and surveillance tests. Physical examination has been recognized as a simple and cost-effective tool, but is often not implemented either because of lack of training or time constraints. Surveillance tests include measurement of access flow or pressure as a surrogate marker of AVF dysfunction. Surveillance tests often require expensive equipment, additional personnel, and are controversial. Currently, there are guidelines and recommendations to include all of these measures while evaluating an AVF. Implementing judicious use of these tools in clinical practice can facilitate early diagnosis for timely intervention in the appropriate population. Furthermore, this strategy may avoid unnecessary interventions and assist with healthcare cost containment.

Dialysis at a crossroads--Part II: A call for action

A previous commentary pointed out that the renal community has led American healthcare in the development and continuous improvement of quality outcomes. However, survival, hospitalization, and quality of life for US dialysis patients is still not optimal. This follow-up commentary examines the obstacles, gaps, and metrics that characterize this unfortunate state of affairs. It posits that current paradigms are essential contributors to quality outcomes but are no longer sufficient to improve quality. New strategies are needed that arise from a preponderance of evidence, in addition to beyond a reasonable doubt standard. This work offers an action plan that consists of new pathways of care that will lead to improved survival, fewer hospitalizations and rehospitalizations, and better quality of life for patients undergoing dialysis therapy. Nephrologists in collaboration with large and small dialysis organizations and other stakeholders, including the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, can implement these proposed new pathways of care and closely monitor their effectiveness. We suggest that our patients deserve nothing less and must receive even more.

Clinical management of dialysis catheter-related bacteremia with concurrent exit-site infection

Dialysis catheter-related bacteremia (CRB) can frequently be treated with systemic antibiotics, in conjunction with an antibiotic lock, in an attempt to salvage the catheter. It is unknown whether CRB associated with an exit-site infection can be treated with such an approach. We retrospectively queried a prospective, computerized vascular access database, and identified 1436 episodes of CRB, of which 64 cases had a concurrent exit site. The frequency of concurrent exit-site infection was 9.6% with Staphylococcus epidermidis, 6.1% with Staphylococcus aureus, and only 0.7% with Gram negative CRB (p < 0.001 for Staphylococcus vs. Gram negative rods). Five serious complications (four major sepses and one endocarditis) occurred in 24 patients with S. aureus infection, but none in 32 episodes of S. epidermidis infection (p = 0.01). Catheter survival was significantly shorter in patients with S. aureus infections. The median catheter survival (without infection or dysfunction) was 14 days with S. aureus vs. 30 days with S. epidermidis infection (p = 0.035). In conclusion, concurrent exit-site infection is seen most commonly in association with Staphylococcal CRB. When the infecting organism is S. epidermidis, attempted salvage with systemic antibiotics and an antibiotic lock is reasonable. However, prompt catheter removal is indicated when the pathogen is S. aureus.

Dialysis access in europe and north america: are we on the same path?

Large differences in dialysis access exist between Europe, Canada, and the United States, even after adjustment for patient characteristics. Vascular access care is characterized by similar issues, but with a different magnitude. Obesity, type 2 diabetes, and peripheral vascular disease, independent predictors of central venous catheter use, are growing problems globally, which could lead to more difficulties in native arteriovenous fistula placement and survival. Creation of dedicated dialysis access teams, including a vascular access coordinator, is a fundamental step in improving vascular access care; however, it might not be sufficient. The possibility that factors other than patient characteristics and surgical skills are important in determining outcomes is likely; it might explain apparent contradictions of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) practices (kidney transplant, peritoneal dialysis, patterns of vascular access use in hemodialysis), where some countries excel in one area and score poorly in another. We are on the same path, but we have a long way to go.