Effects of new analogues of vitamin D on bone cells: implications for treatment of uremic bone disease

Effects of 22-Oxacalcitriol and Calcitriol on PTH Secretion and Bone Mineral Metabolism in a Crossover Trial in Hemodialysis Patients With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism

The purpose of this crossover comparison study is to elucidate the differences between the effects of a novel calcitriol analog, 22-oxacalcitriol, and calcitriol on parathyroid hormone (PTH) and bone mineral metabolism in hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT). Twenty-three patients with moderate to severe SHPT were included in a random 2 x 2 crossover trial with two vitamin D analogs (12 weeks for each treatment). Two patients withdrew during the run-in period for personal reasons. Serum electrolyte, bone metabolic marker, intact PTH (iPTH) and whole PTH (wPTH) levels were measured periodically. The primary endpoint measure was a decrease in serum iPTH level, and the secondary outcome measures included changes in serum calcium (Ca), phosphate (P), and metabolic bone marker levels. Both treatments decreased iPTH and wPTH levels by similar degrees. Serum Ca, P, and Ca x P product levels at the end of each treatment were comparable and the frequencies of hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia were also similar during each treatment period. 22-Oxacalcitriol significantly decreased the levels of bone metabolic markers, namely, bone-specific alkaline phosphate, intact osteocalcin, pyridinoline, and cross-linked N-telopeptide of type I collagen, after a 12-week treatment. In contrast, calcitriol did not change any of the levels of bone metabolic markers. The present study showed that 22-oxacalcitriol is equally effective for PTH suppression, and Ca and P metabolism. In addition, 22-oxacalcitriol might have putative actions on bone remodeling independent of its PTH suppression. Further study is necessary to confirm the effects of 22-oxacalcitriol on bone metabolism in SHPT.

Doxercalciferol treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, effectiveness, safety, and therapeutic considerations related to the use of doxercalciferol in the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search (1966-June 2006) was conducted using the key words vitamin D, ergocalciferols, and secondary hyperparathyroidism. Text word searches were also performed for the terms 1-alpha-hydroxy-vitamin D(2), 1-alpha-hydroxyergocalciferol, Hectorol, and doxercalciferol. Searches were limited to studies published in English and conducted in human subjects.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All published clinical studies evaluating the safety and effectiveness of doxercalciferol in secondary hyperparathyroidism were reviewed, and anecdotal patient reports were also evaluated. Selected clinical studies involving the use of calcitriol and/or paricalcitol in the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism were also included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Doxercalciferol effectively reduces parathyroid hormone levels in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Both oral and intravenous administration can significantly increase serum calcium and/or phosphorus levels as evidenced by placebo-controlled clinical trials. This agent has not been studied comparatively with calcitriol or paricalcitol to assess relative safety.

CONCLUSIONS

Doxercalciferol is approved for and effective in the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism related to CKD, both before and during dialysis, but has not demonstrated a lower incidence of hypercalcemia and/or hyperphosphatemia in relation to other vitamin D therapies. The drug is available in both oral and intravenous dosage forms. Doxercalciferol should be maintained as a formulary alternative for patients unresponsive to or intolerant of other vitamin D therapies, but comparative randomized studies are needed to differentiate its place in therapy.

Effects of calcitriol on type 5b tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase and interleukin-6 in secondary hyperparathyroidism

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHP) is characterized by high bone turnover and elevated serum bone remodeling markers. Elevation of serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels is also characteristic of end-stage renal disease. This study investigates the effects of intravenous calcitriol on serum bone resorptive markers, namely, type 5b tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRACP5b) and IL-6 in patients with SHP.

METHODS

Intravenous calcitriol therapy was given for 16 weeks to 24 patients on maintenance hemodialysis with plasma intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) levels >300 pg/ml. Blood was drawn at baseline and every 4 weeks for 16 weeks for determination of the levels of biochemical parameters, iPTH, IL-6 and bone remodeling markers, including bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (bAP) and TRACP5b.

RESULTS

Only 21 patients responded to the calcitriol therapy, with significant decrements in serum iPTH after 4 weeks of therapy and thereafter. After 16 weeks of calcitriol therapy, 21 patients had significant decrements in serum iPTH (707.9 +/- 317.8 vs. 205.0 +/- 63.1 pg/ml, p < 0.01). Prior to treatment, a significant correlation was found between increased levels of serum iPTH and IL-6 levels (r = 0.45, p < 0.05). After treatment, there was also a significant and parallel lowering of levels of serum iPTH, IL-6 (8.52 +/- 3.59 vs. 7.24 +/- 2.81 pg/ml, p < 0.01), bAP (54.68 +/- 36.17 vs. 24.55 +/- 13.84 U/l, p < 0.01) and TRACP5b (3.41 +/- 1.89 vs. 1.80 +/- 0.55 U/l, p < 0.01). Our results additionally showed significant positive correlationsbetween baseline levels of serum IL-6 and those of iPTH, bAP and TRACP5b. After 16 weeks of calcitriol treatment, the correlation between IL-6 and iPTH levels lost significance but levels of serum IL-6, bAP and TRACP5b remained significantly correlated.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated levels of serum IL-6 and bone remodeling markers, namely, bAP and TRACP5b which are common features of SHP, are effectively suppressed by calcitriol therapy. This indicates that hyperparathyroidism not only accelerates bone remodeling but may also aggravate inflammation in patients on maintenance hemodialysis.

Diagnosis of renal osteodystrophy

The idiom renal osteodystrophy (ROD) represents a heterogeneous pattern of bone disturbances caused by chronic renal insufficiency and concomitant diseases. For the clinical decision of therapy it is most important to differentiate between high and low or adynamic turnover ROD because the therapeutically consequences of these two ends of the ROD spectrum are fundamentally different. Bone histology remains the gold standard for the exact classification of ROD. Serological markers of bone metabolism are not suited for the accurate nomenclature of ROD but are useful for the sequential follow up of ROD after a clear diagnosis has been made. Similarly, radiological diagnosis of ROD using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) or quantitative computer tomography scan (q-CT) is inaccurate and thus more suited for the routine follow up of established disease. Besides mineralization, bone strength and the rate of fractures are strongly determined by the architecture of the bone matrix. This information, however, is also only available on bone biopsy sections and cannot be estimated by non-invasive diagnostic methods. In summary, bone biopsy should be used more liberally for correct classification of bone disease. The sequential follow up and guidance of therapy success can be performed by non-invasive procedures such as biochemical bone marker determination in blood. X-ray imaging and densitometry is suitable only for sequential evaluation of osteoporosis.

New prospects for the management of renal bone disease

The last decade has been a remarkably productive one in the field of bone biology. New insights into the maintenance of a normal bone microenvironment have led to significant advances in our understanding of many important skeletal disorders, including renal osteodystrophy. Novel targets for therapeutic manipulation have been exposed and encouraging progress made towards new treatments. In addition, just as clinical studies have alerted us to the potential hazards of vascular calcification, basic science has unearthed the intimate nature of the relationship between the previously separate disciplines of bone and vascular biology. The clinical nephrologist, however, may be forgiven a little cynicism at this point. If such progress has been made, why do the same proverbial difficulties confront us in day-to-day practice? Control of phosphate remains inadequate, despite a literature which constantly reaffirms its crucial importance, and parathyroid hyperplasia seems inevitable in many patients. Furthermore, even the satisfaction of successful control of serum parathyroid hormone concentration must now be tempered by disquiet regarding the skeletal and cardiovascular consequences of oversuppression. This review aims to provide an update of the latest developments in relevant skeletal research and to assess how recently acquired knowledge may improve clinical nephrological practice over the next five years.

Impaired release of interleukin-6 from human osteoblastic cells in the uraemic milieu

BACKGROUND

Osteoblast-derived interleukin-6 (IL-6) affects bone metabolism and is linked with a number of pathological states characterized by increased bone resorption, including osteoporosis and renal osteodystrophy. To examine the possibility that uraemia directly influences the release of this cytokine in bone, we have investigated the effect of human uraemic serum on the release of IL-6 from human osteoblast-like cells.

METHODS

Individual serum samples collected from healthy male volunteers or male haemodialysis patients prior to and during a dialysis treatment were assayed for IL-6, interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta) and soluble IL-6 receptor (sIL-6R) using specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. MG-63 and SaOS-2 cells were cultured in media containing pooled sera from both groups and alongside matching charcoal-stripped sera. IL-6 concentrations were determined in harvested cell supernatants after 24 h. In further experiments, media containing individual sera obtained from five patients at regular intervals during their haemodialysis treatment were incubated with MG-63 cells to determine the effects of the dialysis process on IL-6 secretion.

RESULTS

Haemodialysis patients had significantly higher (n = 10, P < 0.001) circulating concentrations of IL-6 (7.0 +/- 1.6 pg/ml) than normal subjects (0.4 +/- 0.1 pg/ml), but there were no significant differences in the concentrations of either IL-1beta or sIL-6R. These serum concentrations did not change significantly during 80 min of dialysis. IL-6 release by MG-63 cells incubated with charcoal-stripped serum from normal or from uraemic subjects was similar. Incubation with untreated sera from normal subjects increased IL-6 release by approximately 6-fold above the charcoal-stripped control, whereas sera from uraemic subjects increased IL-6 release by only approximately 2- to 3-fold (normal vs uraemic of 6878 +/- 595 and 2579 +/- 169 pg/ml, respectively, P < 0.001). Similar results were seen with SaOS-2 cells. Haemodialysis did not restore the capacity of uraemic serum to augment IL-6 release to the same degree as normal serum.

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that the augmentation of IL-6 release from human osteoblastic cells after incubation with normal serum is greater than after uraemic serum. This may indicate the presence of an inhibitor of IL-6 release in uraemic serum that is involved in the deranged bone turnover of uraemic patients.

Vitamin D analogs in uremia: integrating medical and nutritional issues

A system of regulatory molecules interacts at the cellular level to control and coordinate the many metabolic pathways that constitute normal mineral metabolism. Alterations that occur in uremia profoundly disrupt this intricate system of regulation. A lack of control poses serious consequences for patients with chronic renal disease, and restoring some level of control represents a significant treatment goal. To achieve adequate treatment, it is necessary to correct aberrations in the metabolism of the major regulatory molecules, parathyroid hormone, vitamin D, calcium, and phosphorus. The use of vitamin D hormone replacement therapy is one important part of this strategy, and the availability of newer vitamin D compounds may prove to be especially beneficial. The effective use of these compounds, nevertheless, depends on the coordinated efforts of each member of the health care team to design and implement an integrated treatment protocol that recognizes all aspects of intervention.

Comparative Efficacy of Oral and Intravenous Calcitriol Treatment in Haemodialysis Patients: Effects on Serum Biochemistry and Cytokine Levels

This study compared the effects of oral and intravenous calcitriol on serum biochemistry parameters and levels of bone-resorptive cytokines in haemodialysis patients. Patients were randomized to receive oral ( n = 18) or intravenous ( n = 16) calcitriol treatment for 6 months. Serum levels of total calcium, ionized calcium, intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), magnesium, alkaline phosphatase, tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-1 and IL-6 were measured at baseline and after 3 and 6 months of treatment. After treatment, serum levels of iPTH, total calcium, ionized calcium, TNF-α, IL-1 and IL-6 were not significantly different from baseline. The intravenous calcitriol treatment group showed significant decreases in levels of iPTH, TNF-α, IL-1 and IL-6 and a significant increase in total calcium level after 3 and 6 months. There was no significant change in serum ionized calcium levels. Significantly decreased serum alkaline phosphatase and magnesium levels were found in both treatment groups after 3 and 6 months. In conclusion, intravenous calcitriol treatment has a significant depressive effect on iPTH and bone-resorptive cytokines in patients undergoing haemodialysis.

Is there an optimal parathyroid hormone level in end-stage renal failure: the lower the better?

Skeletal resistance to parathyroid hormone is well defined in patients with chronic renal failure. In recent years, with the increased frequency of development of adynamic bone disease, it has been recognized that secondary hyperparathyroidism must exist as a 'trade off' mechanism to maintain skeletal bone remodeling in this patient population. An optimal level of intact parathyroid hormone to maintain the normal skeletal bone turnover is believed to be between 2.0 and 2.5 times the upper limit of normal parathyroid hormone. It has very recently been argued that the optimal parathyroid hormone level for maintenance of skeletal bone remodeling may be insufficient to prevent the extraskeletal complications of coronary artery calcifications, calcific valvular heart disease, and cardiac death. To provide optimal health care for these patients several new treatments have been developed, including use of new vitamin D analogs, calcimimetic agents, and noncalcium-based phosphorus binders. It is anticipated that with lower suppression of parathyroid hormone by these vitamin D analogs, intermittent suppression of parathyroid hormone with calcimimetic agents, and the use of noncalcium phosphorus binders (Renageltrade) by regulating serum calcium, the resultant phosphorus concentrations will provide an optimal parathyroid hormone activity to maintain skeletal bone remodeling, while preventing extraskeletal complications.

Regulation of bone remodeling: impact of novel therapies

The kidneys serve as both an endocrine organ and as a target of endocrine action, with the aim of controlling mineral and water balance. Hormones and other key metabolites regulate mineral homeostasis by altering gene function directly or by initiating a sequence of events, leading ultimately to a change in enzyme function. Two of these hormones, parathyroid hormone (PTH) and calcitriol (the active form of vitamin D), interact in multiple tissues in the body to regulate the flux of calcium and phosphorus between extra- and intracellular compartments. Changes in the concentration of PTH and vitamin D, or the interaction of these with other factors, lead to the aberrant regulation of calcium and phosphorus. Among other effects, this aberrant regulation leads to pathologic changes in bone metabolism. The pathology of renal bone disease varies along a spectrum from disorders of low turnover to those of high turnover. This spectrum reflects the results of therapeutic intervention, hormone balances, and other causes. Effective management of renal bone disease therefore requires thorough evaluation of relevant risk factors, measurement of biochemical markers of bone remodeling, and determination of the physical status of bone tissue either by bone mineral density or bone biopsy. Subsequent therapeutic intervention with newer vitamin D compounds, novel phosphate binders, calcimimetics, and the use of alternative dialysis modalities offer hope in normalizing bone remodeling and mineral balance. The human skeleton functions in two capacities: the storage of minerals and structural support of the body. It is the only tissue that behaves as both a major source and a sink of calcium (Ca) and phosphorus (P). Healthy bone is a composite of a collagenous matrix embedded with crystals of hydroxyapatite. On the surface of bone and within the calcified matrix are specialized cells that build and maintain the tissue, and facilitate the movement of Ca and P into and out of serum. Bone undergoes remodeling in response to either damage from mechanical strain or as part of the normal cycle of bone renewal. The process involves distinct steps of cellular activation, bone resorption, and subsequent bone formation. It is a relatively slow process that takes several months, and at any one time occurs at many different sites along the bone surface. Systemic factors, such as PTH and vitamin D, regulate the resorption and formation of bone, and thus the systemic movement of Ca and P. However, during conditions of stress and disease, other factors may also play a role. In patients with chronic renal disease, the balance of Ca and P is profoundly disturbed. This disruption and the compensatory changes that occur in response alter the normal processes of bone metabolism.

Vitamin D analogs in uremia: integrating medical and nutritional issues

A system of regulatory molecules interacts at the cellular level to control and coordinate the many metabolic pathways that constitute normal mineral metabolism. Alterations that occur in uremia profoundly disrupt this intricate system of regulation. A lack of control poses serious consequences for patients with chronic renal disease, and restoring some level of control represents a significant treatment goal. To achieve adequate treatment, it is necessary to correct aberrations in the metabolism of the major regulatory molecules, parathyroid hormone, vitamin D, calcium, and phosphorus. The use of vitamin D hormone replacement therapy is one important part of this strategy, and the availability of newer vitamin D compounds may prove to be especially beneficial. The effective use of these compounds, nevertheless, depends on the coordinated efforts of each member of the health care team to design and implement an integrated treatment protocol that recognizes all aspects of intervention.

Effect of the vitamin D analogues paricalcitol and calcitriol on bone mineral in vitro

Paricalcitol (19-nor-1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(2)), a new vitamin D analogue, recently became available for the treatment of hyperparathyroidism in patients with end-stage renal disease. It is safe and effective in suppressing parathyroid hormone, with apparently less propensity for hypercalcemia than calcitriol (1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3)). However, the mechanism of action on bone has not been fully elucidated. This study compares the effects of paricalcitol and calcitriol on the bone mineral. Neonatal (5- to 7-day-old) mouse calvariae were incubated in the absence or presence of either paricalcitol or calcitriol for 48 hours, and calcium flux, osteocalcin and acid and alkaline phosphatase activity, and interleukin-6 (IL-6) release were determined. Increasing concentrations of both calcitriol and paricalcitol increased calcium efflux. At lower concentrations, paricalcitol had no effect on acid phosphatase activity; however, at 10(-8) mol/L, paricalcitol caused a significant increase similar to that of calcitriol at 10(-9) mol/L. Increasing concentrations of paricalcitol had no effect on alkaline phosphatase activity, whereas calcitriol (10(-8) mol/L) caused significant inhibition. At low concentrations, paricalcitol had no effect on osteocalcin release; however, at 10(-8) mol/L, both compounds significantly increased osteocalcin production. Neither compound had an effect on IL-6 release. These data show that: (1) at low concentrations, both compounds induce a similar calcium efflux from cultured bone; (2) at low concentrations, paricalcitol has no effect on osteocalcin or acid and alkaline phosphatase activity; (3) at greater concentrations, paricalcitol and calcitriol have similar effects on acid phosphatase and osteocalcin activity; (4) calcitriol, but not paricalcitol, inhibits alkaline phosphatase release; and (5) the bone-resorbing effect of both compounds is independent of IL-6 release. Thus, although both compounds have similar effects on calcium efflux from bone, at therapeutic concentrations, paricalcitol does not seem to inhibit osteoblast activity. This may explain, in part, the lower calcemic effect of paricalcitol.

Is aplastic osteodystrophy a disease of malnutrition?

Adynamic bone disease is emerging as a major type of renal osteodystrophy in chronic dialysis patients. Relative hypoparathyroidism is one of the important abnormalities underlying this disease. Recently, several reports have suggested that hypoparathyroidism reflects, at least in part, a state of malnutrition and contributes to the poor prognosis of patients on hemodialysis and chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Such a risk of survival may result not only from the malnutritional state, but also from unknown mechanisms resulting from parathyroid hormone (PTH) deficiency, or from other abnormalities that suppress PTH secretion. Another major abnormality underlying adynamic bone disease is the skeletal resistance to PTH in patients with uremia. Owing to the recent research on bone turnover at the molecular level, several new mechanisms for this abnormality have been elucidated. Correction of this 'skeletal resistance to PTH' will lead to the optimal management of parathyroid function and bone turnover in the future.

22-Oxacalcitriol ameliorates high-turnover bone and marked osteitis fibrosa in rats with slowly progressive nephritis

22-Oxacalcitriol ameliorates high-turnover bone and marked osteitis fibrosa in rats with slowly progressive nephritis.

BACKGROUND

22-Oxacalcitriol (OCT) is a unique vitamin D analogue with less calcemic activity than calcitriol, and it effectively suppresses parathyroid hormone (PTH) secretion in uremic rats. This study was performed to examine the long-term effect of intravenously administered OCT on high-turnover bone disease in model rats of slowly progressive renal failure.

METHODS

Slowly progressive renal failure rats were made by a single injection of glycopeptide isolated from rat renal cortical tissues. At 250 days, glycopeptide-induced nephritis (GN) rats were divided into three groups with the same levels of serum creatinine and PTH, and they received either OCT (0.03 or 0.15 microg/kg body wt) or vehicle given intravenously three times per week for 15 weeks.

RESULTS

Renal function of GN rats deteriorated very slowly but progressively, as assessed by the increase of serum creatinine concentration. At sacrifice, serum PTH levels, bone formation markers, bone resorption markers, and fibrosis volume were significantly elevated in vehicle-treated GN rats compared with those of sham-operated rats, suggesting the development of high-turnover bone disease with osteitis fibrosa. In contrast, in the GN-OCT 0.15 microg/kg group, these high PTH levels and high-turnover bone and fibrosis were significantly decreased. Such amelioration of bone abnormalities by OCT was not accompanied by either hypercalcemia or further deterioration of renal function.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that OCT may be a useful and safe agent not only for the suppression of PTH, but also for the amelioration of osteitis fibrosa and high-turnover bone without causing hypercalcemia in chronic dialysis patients.