Yield of Terminal Duct Lobule Units in Normal Breast Stereotactic Core Biopsy Specimens: Implications for Biomarker Studies

Comparison of Random Periareolar Fine Needle Aspirate versus Ductal Lavage for Risk Assessment and Prevention of Breast Cancer

Random periareolar fine needle aspiration (RPFNA) and ductal lavage (DL) are research techniques developed to (1) assess short-term breast cancer risk in asymptomatic women who are at increased risk for breast cancer and (2) track cytological response to risk reduction strategies. RPFNA and DL provide minimally invasive methods to repeatedly sample epithelial cells and research tools to investigate the biological origins of breast cancer in high-risk women. This review gives an overview of the strengths and limitations of both RPFNA and DL for risk assessment and breast cancer prevention in asymptomatic high-risk women.

Reproducibility of random periareolar fine needle aspiration in a multi-institutional Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Random periareolar fine needle aspiration (RPFNA) is a research technique developed to assess short-term breast cancer risk in women at increased risk of breast cancer. Although there is increasing acceptance of RPFNA, neither the reproducibility nor the inter-institutional compatibility of RPFNA has been established. To address these key limitations, the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) Prevention Group tested the reproducibility of RPFNA in a multi-institutional cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Sixty-three high-risk women from five CALGB institutions (Duke, Ohio State, Roswell Park, Dana Farber, and Vermont) underwent RPFNA from July 1, 2007 to June 30, 2008. Duplicate bilateral RPFNA was performed on each woman by a single investigator on a single day. Masood Cytology Index score was assessed by a single blinded cytopathologist.

RESULTS

There was a high degree of statistical agreement in the Masood Cytology Index scores of duplicate RPFNA samples from the same breast, with a Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.8312 (P < 0.0001). Importantly, although there was agreement in duplicate samples from the same breast, there was lack of agreement between duplicate samples from the opposite breast.

CONCLUSIONS

This multi-institutional study shows that RPFNA is a highly reproducible measure of breast cytology in a cooperative group cross-sectional trial. RPFNA did not show a high degree of agreement between breasts, suggesting that breast cancer risk and progression may occur at different rates in individual breasts from a single woman. These studies provide proof-of-principle for future RPFNA-based cooperative group prevention studies.

Correlation of nipple aspiration and ductal lavage cytology with histopathologic findings for patients before scheduled breast biopsy examination

BACKGROUND

The use of ductal lavage to obtain cells from within the breast ducts has been described for patients at high risk for breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to correlate ductal lavage cytologic findings with the corresponding histology.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients were evaluated and 20 patients underwent ductal lavage followed by breast biopsy examination as a result of positive nipple aspiration fluid. Ductal lavage samples were classified by a cytopathologist as negative, mild atypia, marked atypia, or malignant. A different pathologist interpreted the histologic findings of the biopsy examination.

RESULTS

Adequate specimens for cellularity were obtained in 12 of 22 (53%) patients: 6 of the 12 (50%) had both benign cytology and histology, 2 (16.7%) had benign cytology with atypical ductal hyperplasia or atypical lobular hyperplasia on histology, 2 (16.7%) had marked atypia on cytology and benign histology, and 2 (16.7%) had malignant cytology and benign histology. The specificity of the procedure was 83.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Ductal lavage yielding an adequate sample for analysis was successful in only 52% of patients. Of those, the cytologic-histologic correlation was discordant in 50%. The role of ductal lavage in accurately predicting lesions present on subsequent breast histologic evaluation of planned biopsy examinations requires further investigation.

Mammographic and clinical predictors of drainage patterns in breast lymphoscintigrams obtained during sentinel node procedures

PURPOSE

The authors' purpose was to explore the association between mammographic findings and drainage patterns on lymphoscintigrams obtained during sentinel node procedures for breast carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From July 1997 to March 2000, 132 patients with breast cancer who were included in a prospective mammography-pathology correlation and staging database were imaged 2 hours after perilesional injection of 1 mCi filtered (0. 22 microm) Tc-99m sulfur colloid (4 ml volume) before sentinel node procedures.

RESULTS

Sixty-four percent of the scans showed axillary drainage only, 9% showed axillary and internal mammary drainage, and 4% revealed internal mammary drainage only. Twenty-three percent of scans showed no drainage. Of the patients who showed drainage, 17% showed drainage to the internal mammary basin, and 5% showed this exclusively. Internal mammary drainage was seen in 18% (10 of 57) of lateral, 21% (6 of 29) of medial, and 14% (1 of 7) of subareolar lesions (P = NS). No drainage was seen in 22% of patients with predominantly fatty mammographic parenchymal density (>50%) compared with only 8% of patients with predominantly dense (>50%) parenchyma (P < 0.05). Failure to show drainage was more common in women older than 50 years (P < 0.05). Axillary sentinel nodes were identified surgically in 73% of patients with negative scan findings. There was no significant association between scintigraphic drainage and mammographic soft tissue tumor size and appearance, histologic findings, or axillary node status.

CONCLUSIONS

Dense mammographic parenchyma and age less than 50 years are associated with identification of lymphatic drainage on lymphoscintigrams performed before sentinel node procedures in 91% to 92% of patients. Internal mammary drainage, present in 18% of lateral and 21% of medial lesions, may direct therapy to include internal mammary lymph nodes.

Novel agents for chemoprevention, screening methods, and sampling issues

An aggressive approach to breast cancer control based on preventing the disease must complement efforts at effective treatment. To date clinical trials testing new chemopreventative agents have not generally met with the kind of success expected. A wide range of new breast cancer chemopreventative agents are poised to be tested in clinical trials. We review these novel agents and approaches, including those for which clinical trials have been initiated and those that are promising in the preclinical arena. Further progress in this area requires not only new agents, but novel methods for screening for risk assessment, sampling and development of intermediate biomarkers. We review these novel potential surrogate endpoints, including new imaging-techniques, breast sampling approaches, and methods to assess biomarkers in breast epithelium. Factors that could contribute to a meaningful choice of the chemopreventive agents and the design of clinical trials are discussed.

Breast cancer chemoprevention: current challenges and a look toward the future

There is a need to develop new prevention agents for breast cancer risk reduction that would have fewer side effects than the approved agent, tamoxifen, and/or would be effective in preventing estrogen receptor-negative or tamoxifen-resistant, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers. There also is a need to improve the accuracy of present risk assessment models and to incorporate tissue-based biomarkers to supplement risk prediction tools. Candidate risk biomarkers include the serum hormones insulin-like growth factor-1 and its binding protein-3, mammographic breast density, nipple aspirate fluid production, and breast tissue evidence of proliferative breast disease (intraepithelial neoplasia). A variety of techniques have been developed to randomly sample breast tissue to detect precancerous changes and/or detect modulation of proliferation in response to a prevention agent. Based on molecular abnormalities observed in breast intraepithelial neoplasia, a number of drug classes and combinations are suggested as potential chemoprevention approaches. Clinical trial models have been developed to select the appropriate drug dose for subsequent biomarker modulation chemoprevention trials in which the use of surrogate endpoint biomarkers as indicators of efficacy is being explored. If these biomarkers can be validated and shown to reliably predict and monitor response in phase I/II prevention trials, and if favorable modulation is correlated with subsequent decreased cancer incidence, biomarkers may replace cancer incidence as the endpoint in future phase III trials, dramatically reducing the time and expense associated with new prevention drug development.

Beyond tamoxifen new endpoints for breast cancer chemoprevention, new drugs for breast cancer prevention

Although tamoxifen appears to markedly reduce breast cancer risk in women with a prior diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia or in situ carcinoma, it is not clear what other groups of women receive substantial benefit. Major breast chemoprevention priorities are to (1) develop new agents that (a) have fewer side effects, (b) are effective in ER--as well as tamoxifen-resistant precancerous tissue, and (c) are compatible with hormone therapy; and (2) develop efficient clinical strategies including prognostic and predictive morphologic and molecular biomarkers. Breast tissue may be repeatedly sampled for evidence of intraepithelial neoplasia by fine needle aspiration, ductal lavage, or needle biopsy to select candidates at highest short-term risk as well as to monitor response in small proof of principle studies prior to a large cancer incidence trial. Molecular marker expression may also be used to select a cohort most likely to respond to a particular agent. A large number of new agents are attractive as potential prevention agents and some are already in clinical prevention testing. Compounds which should be effective in ER + precancerous tissue but may have a better side-effect profile include new selective estrogen receptor modulators which lack uterine estrogen agonist activity, isoflavones, aromatase inactivators/inhibitors for postmenopausal women, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone regimens for premenopausal women. Retinoids, rexinoids, and deltanoids may be efficacious in ER+ tissue resistant to tamoxifen. Agents which should theoretically have activity in ER- or ER+ precancerous tissue include polyamine synthesis inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, combined demethylating agents and histone deacetylase inhibitors, as well as metalloprotease and angiogenesis inhibitors. Sample Phase I and Phase II clinical trial designs are reviewed using modulation of molecular markers and breast intraepithelial neoplasia as the major endpoints.

Short-term breast cancer prediction by random periareolar fine-needle aspiration cytology and the Gail risk model

BACKGROUND

: Biomarkers are needed to refine short-term breast cancer risk estimates from epidemiologic models and to measure response to prevention interventions. The purpose of our study was to determine whether the cytologic appearance of epithelial cells obtained from breast random periareolar fine-needle aspirates or molecular marker expression in these cells was associated with later breast cancer development.

METHODS

: Four hundred eighty women who were eligible on the basis of a family history of breast cancer, prior precancerous biopsy, and/or prior invasive cancer were enrolled in a single-institution, prospective trial. Their risk of breast cancer according to the Gail model was calculated, and random periareolar fine-needle aspiration was performed at study entry. Cells were characterized morphologically and analyzed for DNA aneuploidy by image analysis and for the expression of epidermal growth factor receptor, estrogen receptor, p53 protein, and HER2/NEU protein by immunocytochemistry. All statistical tests are two-sided.

RESULTS

: At a median follow-up time of 45 months after initial aspiration, 20 women have developed breast cancer (invasive disease in 13 and ductal carcinoma in situ in seven). With the use of multiple logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards analysis, subsequent cancer was predicted by evidence of hyperplasia with atypia in the initial fine-needle aspirate and a 10-year Gail projected probability of developing breast cancer. Although expression of epidermal growth factor receptor, estrogen receptor, p53, and HER2/NEU was statistically significantly associated with hyperplasia with atypia, it did not predict the development of breast cancer in multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSION

: Cytomorphology from breast random periareolar fine-needle aspirates can be used with the Gail risk model to identify a cohort of women at very high short-term risk for developing breast cancer. We recommend that cytomorphology be studied for use as a potential surrogate end point in prevention trials.