Population Screening for Prostate Cancer and Emerging Concepts for Young Men

Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in American men, accounting for > 29% of all diagnosed cancers and approximately 13% of all cancer deaths. Nearly 1 of every 6 men will be diagnosed with the disease at some time in their lives. In 2003 alone, an estimated 221000 men in the United States will be diagnosed with prostate cancer and > 28000 will die of the disease. An elevated level of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is correlated with the presence of prostate cancer, and since 1989 we have been living in the "PSA era," in which the PSA screening test is widely used in clinical practice. This article summarizes what has been learned about the use of PSA screening, including the intricacies of free PSA, PSA doubling time, and various factors that may affect PSA and confound screening in young men. Although population-based screening for prostate cancer has yet to be definitively proven to affect disease-specific mortality, PSA testing is detecting cancers in younger men and at earlier stages of disease progression and, partly as a result, 5-year cancer-specific survival is increasing. Even though this lead-time effect may not translate into long-term improvement, these changes are very promising and are a necessary prerequisite to effective screening. For patients at high risk with a family history of the disease and for black men, a strategy consisting of an annual PSA blood test and digital rectal examination for men >or=40 years of age appears to be prudent. Use of age- and race-specific reference ranges for PSA based on sensitivity, or maximal cancer detection, is the most appropriate approach in this high-risk group. Specifically among black men 40-49 years of age, those with a PSA value > 2.0 ng/mL should consider further evaluation. Many men at low/average risk aged 40-49 years also request testing and it is reasonable to offer testing and risk assessment to these young men. The exact screening threshold for total PSA in these men is unknown, but 95% of these men will have a PSA < 2.5 ng/mL. Prostate-specific antigen velocity, percentage of free PSA, and perhaps complexed PSA may be used to help determine risk, but further study of young men is needed. In the future, a risk-stratified approach using molecular biomarkers and/or proteomics in young men is anticipated.

Age-related reference ranges for complexed prostate-specific antigen and complexed/total prostate-specific antigen ratio: results from East Texas Medical Center Cancer Institute screening campaign

The East Texas Medical Center Cancer Institute conducted a regional prostate cancer screening campaign over a 3-year period from 1998 through 2000. Total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA), complexed PSA (cPSA), and cPSA/tPSA ratio (c/tPSA) values were determined. To better define prostate cancer in the population, we chose to determine age-based reference ranges for these PSA isoforms in apparently healthy men. Participants (N = 12,902) between the ages of 20 and 94 were screened and demographic information and serum tPSA and cPSA values were collected across 41 centers throughout East Texas. Men with an abnormal digital rectal examination, a follow-up biopsy indicating prostatic disease, or any clinical signs and symptoms of prostatic disease were excluded. Sera from 7541 evaluable men were tested with the Bayer Immuno 1 PSA and cPSA methods at East Texas Medical Center. The resulting PSA data were then stratified by decade of age to determine age-related reference ranges for each PSA species. The cPSA values increased across all age decades: 40 to 49 years, 1.45 ng/mL; 50 to 59, 1.92 ng/mL; 60 to 69, 2.49 ng/mL; and 70 to 79, 2.77 ng/mL (95th percentile). tPSA levels also increased with age: 1.81 ng/mL, 2.45 ng/mL, 3.17 ng/mL, and 3.57, respectively. Comparatively, the c/tPSA levels remained constant (0.87), regardless of age. The upper limits of tPSA and cPSA values reported here suggest that men should be screened using lower cutoff values than are currently in use. These limits may more accurately identify prostate cancer among otherwise healthy men.

Prostate-specific antigen-enhanced testing and risk stratification for chemoprevention trials

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing could be used to identify men who are at higher future risk of developing clinical prostate cancer or to diagnose prostate cancer earlier in high-risk groups, such as black men or those with a family history of the disease. These cohorts then could be offered chemopreventive clinical trial participation opportunities. The Physicians' Health Study and other longitudinal studies have shown that even between a PSA level of 1.0 and 4.0 ng/mL, the risk of future prostate cancer is incrementally increased. Department of Defense Studies of young men between 15 and 45 show that normal men have very low PSA values. Using a threshold PSA even as low as 1.5 ng/mL for men in their fifth decade is well beyond the 95th percentile of "normal" PSA. Young black men between 40 and 49 years old have a higher risk of prostate cancer than white men and should be pursued for chemoprevention studies. PSA is not perfect. Benign prostatic hyperplasia and inflammation (and, perhaps, other factors) can confound the use of PSA thresholds to identify men for chemoprevention or early detection. Certain chemopreventive agents may affect PSA physiology without affecting the disease process itself creating a meaningless epiphenomenon. Young black men may not generally be receptive to PSA testing or chemopreventive trials.