Multiple unconfirmed-reactive screening tests for viral antibodies among blood donors

Neutralization positive but apparent false-positive hepatitis B surface antigen in a blood donor following influenza vaccination

We report a case of transient, confirmed positive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in a 25 year old long term Canadian Blood Services (CBS) donor, who reported receiving 2011-2012 seasonal trivalent (A/H1N1, A/H3N2, Influenza B) inactivated influenza vaccine two days before donation. To our knowledge, this report is the first published case implicating influenza vaccine as a possible factor in false-positive HBsAg test results. Seasonal incidence of repeat-reactive HBsAg among CBS donors suggests a potential contributory role of influenza vaccine or community acquired infection. We speculate that influenza vaccine may rarely be associated with sporadic, transient, false-positive HBsAg results.

Analysis of voluntary blood donors with biologic false reactivity on chemiluminescent immunoassays and implications for donor management

BACKGROUND

Biologic false-reactive (BFR) results in blood donors are problematic due to both component loss and donor-management issues. This report analyzes the results of a longitudinal study of BFR donors and the implications for donor management.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Donors who gave BFR results on HBsAg, HIV-1/HIV-2, HCV, or HTLV-I/HTLV/II chemiluminescent immunoassays (ChLIAs) (PRISM, Abbott) between May 1997 to March 1999 were analyzed. Donors were followed up for up to three donations after an index BFR episode. In addition, results of any negative donations before the index BFR result but within the study period were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

For donors who gave an index BFR result on the HBsAg ChLIA, 14.3 percent remained BFR at subsequent donations, whereas for the anti-HIV-1/HIV-2, anti-HCV, and anti-HTLV-I/HTLV-II ChLIAs, the figures were 66.0, 77.4, and 71.6 percent, respectively. For donors who gave a second BFR result, the percentage who remained BFR at subsequent donations was 75.0, 80.6, 84.6, and 74.5 percent for the four assays, respectively. The rate at which negative repeat donors became BFR during the study period was 0.02, 0.07, 0.12, and 0.02 percent for the HBsAg, anti-HIV-1/HIV-2, anti-HCV, and anti-HTLV-I/HTLV-II assays, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that donors who give an index BFR result on the ChLIAs (PRISM, Abbott) should be allowed to continue donating because most donors with a HBsAg BFR result were negative at subsequent donations, and between 22.6 and 34.0 percent of those with BFR results on the HIV-1/HIV-2, HCV, or HTLV-I/HTLV-II assays gave subsequent negative donations. However, donors who give a second BFR result should be counseled and deferred because they were very unlikely to give subsequent negative results.

Blood screening by nucleic acid amplification technology: current issues, future challenges

BACKGROUND

Nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT) is presently being evaluated in US clinical trials to determine the safety and efficacy of mini-pool testing for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in the blood-donor population. Although the risk for transfusion-transmitted HIV and HCV infection is extremely low, there is still a small chance that blood donated by infected individuals before seroconversion can escape detection by current antibody-based assays.

METHODS

This report describes the amplification technologies being used and reviews several issues surrounding NAT-based blood screening. The performance features of NAT and current enzyme immunoassay technologies are compared, and the benefits of NAT in reducing transfusion-transmitted infections are discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

The current US clinical trials of mini-pool NAT testing for HIV and HCV RNA have successfully identified preseroconversion infectious blood units. Although the current NAT-based screening systems are semiautomated, mini-pool testing represents an unprecedented innovation among government and nongovernment agencies in the highly regulated blood transfusion industry. Despite cost-effectiveness issues, based on the public perception of infectious diseases acquired through blood transfusion, NAT-based screening of the blood supply is expected to become a standard in transfusion medicine.