Collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells after the administration of cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor: an analysis of 497 patients

Gemcitabine, dexamethasone and cisplatin (GDP) is an effective and well-tolerated mobilization regimen for relapsed and refractory lymphoma: a single center experience

Background/aim

Gemcitabine, dexamethasone and cisplatin (GDP) is a well-established salvage regimen for relapsed and refractory lymphomas. In this study, we aimed to share our experience with the patients who received GDP/R-GDP (rituximab-gemcitabine, dexamethasone and cisplatin) for stem cell mobilization.

Materials and methods

Data of 69 relapsed and refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients who received GDP/R-GDP as salvage chemotherapy in our center between July 2014 and January 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. After the evaluation of response, 52 patients had a chemosensitive disease and underwent mobilization with GDP/R-GDP plus G–CSF (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor). Collected CD34+ stem cells and related parameters were compared in terms of diagnosis of HL and NHL, early and late stage, patients who did not receive RT and those who received RT, and patients aged under 60 and over 60.

Results

On the 15th day on average (range 11–20), a median number of 8.7 × 106 /kg (4.1–41.5) CD34+ stem cells were collected in 51 (98%) of our 52 chemosensitive patients and 1 (2%) patients failed to mobilize. We observed acceptable hematological and nonhematological toxicity. The targeted amount of 2 × 106 /kg CD34+ stem cells was attained by 98% (n: 51) patients, and all of them underwent autologous stem cell transplantation. Moreover, low toxicity profiles provide outpatient utilization option clinics with close follow-up and adequate supportive care.

Conclusion

We suggest that GDP/R-GDP plus G-CSF can be used as an effective chemotherapy regimen for mobilizing CD34+ stem cells from peripheral blood in relapsed and refractory lymphoma patients due to low toxicity, effective tumor reduction, and successful stem cell mobilization. It can also be assumed that the GDP mobilization regimen may be more effective, especially in patients with early-stage disease and in HL patients.

Real World Clinical Experience of Biosimilar G-CSF (Grastofil) for Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization: Single Center Experience in Canada Following Early Adoption

Introduction: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is the first line treatment for mobilization, most commonly using a regimen of daily filgrastim. The use of biosimilars can provide substantial cost savings to the health care system while delivering comparable efficacy outcomes. In 2016, the Saskatchewan Cancer Agency was a leader in Canada, instituting formulary changed from a G-CSF originator product to a cost savings alternative biosimilar for stem cell mobilization prior to autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) and for engraftment. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical comparability of biosimilar G-CSF to its reference product in a real-world clinical setting and to validate use of the biosimilar in mobilization and engraftment-an indication which had been granted by extrapolation.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was completed including all patients diagnosed with a hematological malignancy between 2012 and 2018 who underwent ASCT. To assess real-world outcomes across a diverse population, successful CD34+ stem cell collection was compared between patients mobilized with originator filgrastim, Neupogen, and biosimilar filgrastim, Grastofil. Additional comparisons included the number of apheresis required, time to absolute neutrophil count (ANC) engraftment, platelet engraftment, length of hospital stay, and Plerixafor use.

RESULTS

217 patients were mobilized and transplanted during the study period. There was no statistically significant difference in success rate between patients mobilized with biosimilar filgrastim and those who had received originator G-CSF (100% vs. 92.4%, p = 0.075). Neither disease type, nor concurrent chemomobilization regimen resulted in a detectable difference between the two G-CSF products in successful stem cell harvest. Engraftment was highly similar between groups, as demonstrated by ANC recovery (11.6 days Neupogen vs. 11.6 days Grastofil), platelet recovery (14.0 days Neupogen vs. 14.2 days Grastofil), and total length of hospital stay (22.4 days Neupogen vs. 22.3 days Grastofil). No statistically significant difference in adjunctive use of Plerixafor^® was observed between Neupogen and Grastofil patients (25.9% vs. 23.4%, p = 0.72).

CONCLUSION

Extrapolation of indications for biosimilars is justified. This real-world evidence builds upon registrational studies to confirm that no clinically meaningful differences were detected between originator Neupogen and biosimilar Grastofil in the setting of PBSC mobilization and engraftment post ASCT. Biosimilars are as safe and effective as originator products. Implementation across all approved indications without hesitation maximizes cost savings to the provincial system, allowing for more optimal allocation of health care resources.

Management of mobilization failure in 2017

In contemporary clinical practice, almost all allogeneic transplantations and autologous transplantations now capitalize on peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) as opposed to bone marrow (BM) for the source of stem cells. In this context, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) plays a pivotal role as the most frequently applied frontline agent for stem cell mobilization. For patients classified as high-risk, chemotherapy based mobilization regimens can be preferred as a first choice and it is notable that this also used for remobilization. Mobilization failure occurs at a rate of 10%-40% with traditional strategies and it typically leads to low-efficiency practices, resource wastage, and delayed in treatment intervention. Notably, however, several factors can impact the effectiveness of CD34⁺ progenitor cell mobilization, including patient age and medical history (prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy, disease and marrow infiltration at the time of mobilization). In recent years, main (yet largely ineffective) approach was to increase G-CSF dose and add SCF, but novel and promising pathways have been opened up by the synergistic impact of a reversible inhibitor of CXCR4, plerixafor, with G-CSF. The literature shows to its favorable results in upfront and failed mobilizers, and it is necessary to use plerixafor (or equivalent agents) to optimize HSC harvest in poor mobilizers. Different CXCR4 inhibitors, growth hormone, VLA4 inhibitors, and parathormone, have been cited as new agents for mobilization failure in recent years. In view of the above considerations, the purpose of this paper is to examine the mobilization of PBSC while focusing specifically on poor mobilizers.

Incidence of late onset neutropenia associated with rituximab use in B cell lymphoma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation

Reversible late onset neutropenia associated with rituximab has been reported with incidence rates varying from 15 to 70% in B cell lymphoma patients receiving autologous stem cell transplantation. We conducted a retrospective descriptive study at one tertiary care center in adult B cell lymphoma patients treated with rituximab and autologous stem cell transplantation between 1 January 2004 and 30 June 2014. Late onset neutropenia was defined as an absolute neutrophil count <1.0 × 109 cells/L after neutrophil engraftment and less than six months post autologous stem cell transplantation. The primary objective was to determine the incidence of late onset neutropenia. The secondary objectives were to examine whether the use of rituximab with re-induction therapy, mobilization or high dose chemotherapy regimens increased the risk for late onset neutropenia, and to evaluate infectious complications. Of 315 subjects, 92 (29.2%) developed late onset neutropenia. Mobilization regimens containing rituximab (OR 2.90 95% CI: 1.31–6.40), high dose chemotherapy containing rituximab (OR 1.87 95% CI: 1.14–3.05), and exposure to rituximab in either or both regimens (OR 3.05 95% CI: 1.36–6.88) significantly increased the risk of late onset neutropenia. While neutropenic, 17.4% experienced an infection, 7.6% experienced febrile neutropenia, and 5.4% were hospitalized. In conclusion, rituximab with mobilization or high dose chemotherapy may increase the risk of late onset neutropenia post autologous stem cell transplantation.

Mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells for autologous transportation: consensus recommendations

Selected patients with certain hematological malignancies and solid tumors have the potential to achieve long-term survival with autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell transplant. The collection of these cells in peripheral blood avoids multiple bone marrow aspirations, results in faster engraftment and allows treatment of patients with infection, fibrosis, or bone marrow hypocellularity. However, for the procedure to be successful, it is essential to mobilize a sufficient number of progenitor cells from the bone marrow into the blood circulation. Therefore, a group of Brazilian experts met in order to develop recommendations for mobilization strategies adapted to the reality of the Brazilian national health system, which could help minimize the risk of failure, reduce toxicity and improve the allocation of financial resources.

Tbo-Filgrastim versus Filgrastim during Mobilization and Neutrophil Engraftment for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

There are limited data available supporting the use of the recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), tbo-filgrastim, rather than traditionally used filgrastim to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) or to accelerate engraftment after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). We sought to compare the efficacy and cost of tbo-filgrastim to filgrastim in these settings. Patients diagnosed with lymphoma or plasma cell disorders undergoing G-CSF mobilization, with or without plerixafor, were included in this retrospective analysis. The primary outcome was total collected CD34(+) cells/kg. Secondary mobilization endpoints included peripheral CD34(+) cells/μL on days 4 and 5 of mobilization, adjunctive use of plerixafor, CD34(+) cells/kg collected on day 5, number of collection days and volumes processed, number of collections reaching 5 million CD34(+) cells/kg, and percent reaching target collection goal in 1 day. Secondary engraftment endpoints included time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment, number of blood product transfusions required before engraftment, events of febrile neutropenia, and length of stay. A total of 185 patients were included in the final analysis. Patients receiving filgrastim (n = 86) collected a median of 5.56 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg, compared with a median of 5.85 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg in the tbo-filgrastim group (n = 99; P = .58). There were no statistically significant differences in all secondary endpoints with the exception of apheresis volumes processed (tbo-filgrastim, 17.0 liters versus filgrastim, 19.7 liters; P < .01) and mean platelet transfusions (tbo-filgrastim, 1.7 units versus filgrastim, 1.4 units; P = .04). In conclusion, tbo-filgrastim demonstrated similar CD34(+) yield compared with filgrastim in mobilization and post-transplantation settings, with no clinically meaningful differences in secondary efficacy and safety endpoints. Furthermore, tbo-filgrastim utilization was associated with cost savings of approximately $1406 per patient utilizing average wholesale price.

Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell harvesting: technical advances and clinical utility

Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) transplantations require prior harvesting of allogeneic or autologous HSPCs. HSPCs are usually present in bone marrow (BM) during the entire life, in cord blood (CB) at birth, or in peripheral blood (PB) under particular circumstances. HSPCs were first harvested in BM and later in CB and PB, as studies showed interesting features of such grafts. All harvesting methods were in use throughout the years, except BM harvesting for HSPC autologous transplantation, which was replaced by PB harvesting. BM, CB, and PB harvesting methods have been developed, and materials and devices technically improved to increase the number of HSPCs harvested. In parallel, knowing the features of the donors or patients associated with successful numbers of HSPCs allows the adaptation of appropriate harvesting methods. Moreover, it is important to ensure the safety of donors or patients while harvesting. This review describes the methods used for harvesting based on recent studies or developments around these methods, and more particularly, the means developed to increase the numbers of HSPCs harvested in each method. It also explains briefly the influence of technical improvements in HSPC harvesting on potential changes in HSPC graft composition.

Comparative effectiveness analysis of different salvage therapy intensities used for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in Northern or Southern Alberta: an instrumental variable analysis

To date, no clinical trial has addressed salvage therapy intensity for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We sought to determine whether the more intensive salvage chemotherapy approach used in Southern Alberta (SAB) compared to the conventional dose salvage approach used in Northern Alberta (NAB) affects the rates of autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) and survival in patients with relapsed DLBCL. Using instrumental variable analysis, we examined 147 consecutive patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL from 2004 to 2010 who received salvage therapy in SAB (n = 70) or NAB (n = 77). Patients treated in SAB had higher rates of: salvage chemotherapy response (85.0% vs. 54.0%, p = 0.001), ASCT (61.4% vs. 41.6%, p = 0.016) and 4-year overall survival (41% vs. 20%, p = 0.002) than those in NAB, respectively. This study supports the hypothesis that selective use of intensive salvage chemotherapy leads to higher rates of ASCT and survival in this population.

Advances in mobilization for the optimization of autologous stem cell transplantation

In autologous stem cell transplantation, mobilized peripheral blood has replaced the bone marrow as the preferred source of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). Because HSCs normally exist in the blood in very low numbers, the use of agents to "mobilize" HSCs from the marrow niche to the peripheral blood is essential for successful transplantation. Until recently, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor were the only approved agents by the US Food and Drug Administration for use as peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC)-mobilizing agents in the United States, but G-CSF has become the gold standard. Unfortunately, some patients fail to mobilize sufficient numbers of PBSCs for transplantation in response to G-CSF with or without chemotherapy. Recently, a new agent, plerixafor (AMD3100) added to G-CSF has been approved to enhance PBSC mobilization. This review will discuss the current methodologies to improve hematopoietic stem cell mobilization.

Peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and collection efficacy is not an independent prognostic factor for autologous stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

The successful mobilization and collection of hematopoietic stem cells are dependent on a number of clinical factors such as previous chemotherapy and disease stage. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine whether the effectiveness of mobilization and collection is an independent prognostic factor for autologous stem cell transplantation outcome.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 358 patients who received transplants from January 2003 to December 2004 (201 male and 157 female patients, ages from 2.7 to 77.3 years with median of 53 years of age) underwent autologous hematopoietic stem cell collection after mobilization with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or G-CSF plus chemotherapy priming. This retrospective study included patients with diagnoses of acute myelogenous leukemia, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease, multiple myeloma, and solid tumors. All patients underwent stem cell collection until a target or a minimum CD34+ cell dose was reached. Correlations were performed between stem cell mobilization and/or collection efficacy and transplantation outcomes.

RESULTS

In general, both larger reinfused CD34+ cell dose and shorter number of days for the stem cell count to reach the minimum of 2 x 10(6) per kg CD34+ cells do not foster quicker engraftment. Reinfused CD34+ cell dose of less than 12 x 10(6) and number of days stem cell collection to reach this minimum CD34+ cell dose did not independently affect the overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS).

CONCLUSION

The effectiveness of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and collection as defined as number of days to reach a CD34+ cell dose of 2 x 10(6) per kg should not be used independently to forecast posttransplantation prognosis, engraftment, DFS, and OS.

In leukapheresis products from non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients, the immature hematopoietic progenitors show higher CD90 and CD34 antigenic expression

Damage to the stem cell progenitors caused by the chemotherapy received in patients diagnosed with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) may be an important factor limiting progenitor cell mobilization. The aim of the present analysis was to evaluate the effect of the chemotherapy on the different progenitor cell subpopulations obtained in the leukapheresis. For this purpose, a combination of immunophenotype and functional assays has been performed in 26 mobilized peripheral blood (PB) samples from NHL patients and 36 healthy donors. The different progenitor subpopulations analyzed by flow cytometry significantly correlated with the corresponding populations assessed by functional assays in both healthy donors and NHL patients (p<0.05, r>0.5). The number of committed CFU-GM was similar in both groups (p=0.246), but we found significant decrease in the number of BFU-E and more immature progenitors in PB from NHL patients as compared to donors (p<0.05). Moreover, the number of total CFU was significantly lower in NHL patients (p=0.007). Accordingly, CD34+ cells (p=0.018) and CD34+ subpopulations was decreased in NHL patients. Nevertheless, CD90 and CD34 intensity was significantly higher within CD34+ cells from NHL patients as compared to donors. However, although numerically reduced non-committed CD34+ cells are more immature in chemotherapy mobilized NHL patients. In summary, our results show that all NHL hematopoietic progenitors, analyzed by both immunophenotypical and functional approaches, are impaired in leukapheresis products.

Ifosfamide, epirubicin, and etoposide (IEV) mobilize peripheral blood stem cells more efficiently than cyclophosphamide/etoposide

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support is an effective treatment in advanced multiple myeloma. In this study, we compare chemotherapy with ifosfamide, epirubicin, and etoposide (IEV) or cyclophosphamide and etoposide (CE) in 47 patients with multiple myeloma with regard to stem cell mobilization, toxicity, and tumor response. The proportion of patients reaching the threshold of >6 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg body weight was significantly higher in the IEV group (97% vs 71%), and more CD34+ cells (10 x 10(6) vs 3.5 x 10(6) cells/kg; p = 0.002) could be collected by the first leukapheresis associated with less leukaphereses needed. Non-hematopoietic side effects were mild with nausea being more frequent after IEV treatment (30% vs 7%). Grade 3/4 neutropenia (thrombocytopenia) occurred in 89 and 100% (55 and 44%) of the patients. There was one treatment-related death due to septic shock in the IEV group. Grade 3/4 anemia was more frequent in the IEV group (19% vs 0%). Forty-two percent (IEV) and 50% (CE) received inpatient treatment for neutropenic fever. In 20 and 7% of the patients, a partial response was observed after IEV and CE. However, the overall response rate (complete response and partial tumor response) after mobilization and tandem high-dose chemotherapy was 75% after IEV and 78% after CE and, thus, independent of the mobilization. In summary, both treatment protocols can readily be used for the mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells with comparable major toxicities and similar tumor response rates. However, the efficiency of the stem cell mobilization was significantly higher after IEV treatment.

Cytoreduction of lymphoid malignancies and mobilization of blood hematopoietic progenitor cells with high doses of cyclophosphamide and etoposide plus filgrastim

We evaluated the efficiency of high doses of cyclophosphamide (6 g/m2) and etoposide (2 g/m2) plus filgrastim (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; G-CSF) to mobilize autologous hematopoietic progenitor cells in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and Waldenström macroglobulinemia. We also evaluated the safety of this regimen and the engraftment kinetics after myeloablative chemotherapy. Seventy-nine patients with high-risk or relapsed/primary refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma, multiple myeloma, or Waldenström macroglobulinemia were treated. The mobilizing regimen was as follows: cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 twice daily for 10 doses, etoposide 200 mg/m2 twice daily for 10 doses (continuous; n=57) or 2 g/m2 over 10 hours on day 5 of etoposide (bolus; n=22), and G-CSF 5 microg/kg/d beginning day 14. Fifty-nine percent of patients achieved the primary end point (a CD34 cell dose of 5 million per kilogram with a single leukapheresis). More bolus etoposide patients achieved the primary end point (86%) compared with continuous etoposide patients (47%; P<.0001). The CD34 cell dose collected was greater in bolus etoposide patients (44 million per kilogram) than in continuous etoposide patients (10.9 million per kilogram; P<.0001). Patients took 3 weeks to recover >500/microL neutrophils and >20000/microL platelets after cyclophosphamide and etoposide. The overall response rate was 69% for non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients and 71% for multiple myeloma/Waldenström macroglobulinemia patients. The treatment-related mortality was 2.5%. Sixteen percent of surviving patients experienced grade>or=3 nonhematologic toxicity. Patients receiving bolus etoposide had significantly less grade>or=2 oral mucositis, less use of total parenteral nutrition, and less need for red blood cell and platelet transfusions. Sixty-four patients (81%) underwent autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation, with prompt engraftment. Four patients (5%) did not undergo autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation because of toxicity from high-dose cyclophosphamide and etoposide. We conclude that high doses of cyclophosphamide and etoposide combined with G-CSF are an efficient and safe mobilizing regimen for the collection of hematopoietic progenitor cells during aggressive cytoreduction of tumor burden in patients with lymphoid malignancies.

Factors for PBPC collection efficiency and collection predictors

Factors affecting collection efficiency of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) include patient's age, diagnosis, preceding chemoradiotherapy, disease invasion of the bone marrow and mobilizing chemotherapy in PBSC collection for autologous transplants. Mobilizing cytokines, timing for apheresis, machines and operating software would affect mobilization and collection of PBSCs both for autologous and allogeneic transplantation. Also donor's age and gender would affect PBSC yield for allogeneic transplantation. Surrogate markers including peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts before mobilization and on day of collection have been reported to predict the yield of PBSC harvest. A number of standard procedures have been developed based on these findings. Newer agents for PBSC mobilization are being evaluated and still other factors affecting mobilization are being sought to better predict and cope with poor mobilization.

Impact of chemotherapy regimen and hematopoietic growth factor on mobilization and collection of peripheral blood stem cells in cancer patients

Various chemotherapy regimens, combined with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor(rhG-CSF) or recombinant granulocyte-macrophage CSF (rhGM-CSF) are used in cancer patients to mobilize and collect peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). In this retrospective study, we evaluated and compared the efficacy of such regimens in 262 patients with different types of malignant diseases. The following chemotherapy regimens were applied: ifosfamide-etoposide-cisplatin or bleomycin (n = 96; mainly patients with testicular cancer); ifosfamide-etoposide plus or minus cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) or vincristine (VCR)(n = 52; mainly patients with lymphoma); cyclophosphamide-anthracycline (n = 53; mainly patients with breast cancer); intermediate to high dose (ID-HD) cyclophosphamide (n = 37; mainly patients with breast or ovarian cancer. or multiple myeloma; and others (n = 24). rhG-CSF or rhGM-CSF, each at an average daily dose of 5 microg/kg body weight, were used in 166 and 96 patients, respectively. The study evaluated and compared the efficacy of these two cytokines. In patients receiving rhG-CSF, CD34+ cells could be collected earlier (median: day 14 versus day 16) and there was a significantly higher white blood cell count (WBC)(median 11,350 versus 5550/microl) and CD34+ cell count (median 88 versus 43/microl) at the start of apheresis, and a significantly higher CD34+ cell yield (median 7.4 x 10(6) versus 4.6 x 10(6)/kg) than in patients who receivedrhGM-CSF. Among the various chemotherapeutic regimens used, each combined with rhG-CSF, ifosfamide-etoposide plus or minus Ara-C or VCR mobilized a significantly higher number of CD34+ cells (median 119/microl) and produced a significantly higher harvest of these cells (median 13 x 10(6)/kg) than cyclophosphamide-anthracycline (median 87/microl and 7 x 10(6)/kg, respectively) or ID-HD cyclophosphamide (median 59/microl and 5 x I 0(6)/kg, respectively). Ifosfamide-etoposide plus or minus Ara-C or VCR was also superior to ifosfamide-etoposide-cisplatin or bleomycin (median 78/microl and 9 x 10(6)/kg, respectively), but at borderline significance. The outcome of PBSC mobilization and collection appeared to be negatively influenced by the number of relapses before the current salvage treatment. These data indicate that mobilization and collection of PBSCstrongly depend on the type of hematopoietic growth factor and chemotherapeutic regimen used. The data further show rhG-CSF is a more effective growth factor than rhGM-CSF and ifosfamide-etoposide-based regimens, particularly ifosfamide-etoposide plus or minus Ara-C or VCR, are highly effective regimens in mobilizing and collecting CD34+ cells.

High-dose thiotepa, melphalan and carboplatin (TMCb) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with advanced breast cancer: a retrospective evaluation

This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of high-dose thiotepa, melphalan and carboplatin (TMCb) regimen in 27 patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for metastatic breast cancer. A total of 27 patients with stage IV breast cancer underwent ASCT following thiotepa (500 mg/m(2)), melphalan (100 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (1200-1350 mg/m(2)). Of 27 patients, 17 had refractory relapse, eight had responding relapse, and two had no evidence of disease (NED) at the time of transplant. In all, 11 patients had only bone disease, nine had bone plus visceral disease, three had only visceral disease, and two had locoregional recurrent disease. The median time from diagnosis to transplant was 1081 days (range 180-2341). Staging for evaluation of response was performed 4-6 months after transplantation. Five patients were not evaluable (NE) for response because of NED at transplant (n=2) or early death due to transplant-related complications (n=3) (two of viral pneumonia and one of regimen-related toxicity) occurring at a median of 4 days (range 11-46) post-transplant. One of the two patients who was NED at the time of transplant is still NED on day 760 post-transplant. Seven of 15 refractory (47%) and 5/7 (71%) responsive patients with evaluable disease achieved a complete response of all measurable disease or all soft-tissue disease with at least improvement in bone lesions. Of 27 patients (37%),(10) are alive and progression-free, a median of 582 days (range 410-1380) after treatment, 6/17 (35%) with refractory disease and 4/10 (40%) with responsive disease. The probability of progression-free survival (PFS) for all patients was 0.50. The probabilities of PFS at 2 years for patients with refractory (n=17) and responsive (n=10) disease were 0.42 and 0.60, respectively. PFS at 2 years for the 14 patients who were NED or achieved CR/PR(*) following-HDC was 0.67. PFS at 2 years for patients who did not achieve CR/PR(*) following-DHC was 0.33. These preliminary data suggest that high-dose TMCb followed by autologous stem cell transplantation is an effective regimen for patients with advanced breast cancer and may be comparable to some previously used regimens.

Factors influencing the collection of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia and non-myeloid malignancies

Factors influencing the collection of autologous peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) were studied in 182 mobilization procedures performed on 145 consecutive patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML; n=67) and with various non-myeloid malignancies (NMM; n=78). PBSC were collected following mobilization with chemotherapy, treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or chemotherapy plus G-CSF. Fewer colony-forming unit granulocyte-macrophages (CFU-GMs) were collected from patients with AML than from patients with NMM (P<0.0001), although there were no differences in the numbers of CD34+ cells collected between both groups. Multiple regression analysis showed that chemotherapy alone was predictive of a low CD34+ yield in patients with NMM (regression coefficient (RC)=-2.1; P=0.003). In addition, the interactions "diagnosis mutliple myeloma (MM)xmobilization with chemotherapy" (RC=2.9; P=0.004) and "diagnosis MMxmobilization with chemotherapy plus G-CSF" (RC=2.1; P=0.04) also remained in the model, both showing a favorable influence. In AML, mobilization with chemotherapy plus G-CSF was associated with higher CD34+ yields (P=0.003). In this subgroup of patients, multiple regression analysis identified the number of cycles of previous chemotherapy (< or =2 cycles; RC=1.3; P=0.03) and peripheral blood counts (WBC > or =1.5 x 10(9)/l and monocytes >20%; RC=0.8; P=0.02) as the factors most predictive of CD34+ cell yield. These findings emphasize the need to optimize harvesting technique to enhance safety and minimize morbidity and costs of this valuable procedure.

Cyclophosphamide, etoposide and G-CSF to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with lymphoma

We aimed to assess the effectiveness of cyclophosphamide, etoposide and G-CSF (C+E) to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with lymphoma. A matched cohort study was performed comparing patients mobilized with C+E to patients mobilized with cyclophosphamide and G-CSF (C alone). Patients were matched for disease, prior radiotherapy and a chemotherapy score reflecting the amount and type of prior chemotherapy. Thirty-eight consecutive patients mobilized with C+E were compared with 38 matched controls. C+E was equivalent to C alone in terms of numbers of patients achieving a minimum threshold of > or =2 x 10(6)/kg CD34(+)cells (82% vs 79%, P = 0.74). C+E was superior, however, in terms of total CD34(+) yield (6.35 vs 3.3 x 10(6)/kg, P < 0.01), achieving a target graft of > or =5 x 10(6)/kg (55% vs 34%, P = 0.04) and obtaining both a minimum (61% vs 32%, P < 0.01) and target (45% vs 13%, P < 0.01) graft in one apheresis. This superiority was largely confined to patients with lower chemotherapy scores. There was no difference in neutrophil and platelet recovery or transfusion requirements for those who subsequently received high-dose therapy and stem cell transplantation. Thus, C+E improves the efficiency of peripheral blood stem cell collection, but does not increase the number of patients who can proceed to transplantation. Most of the benefit of the regimen was confined to patients who had not received extensive prior therapy. Novel strategies are required to increase the collection efficiency of 'hard to mobilize' patients.

Economic evaluation of filgrastim, sargramostim, and sequential sargramostim and filgrastim after myelosuppressive chemotherapy

Filgrastim alone and sequential sargramostim and filgrastim have been shown to be more effective than sargramostim alone in the mobilization of CD34(+) cells after myelosuppressive chemotherapy (MC). We sought to compare costs and resource use associated with these regimens. Data were collected prospectively alongside a multicenter, randomized trial of filgrastim, sargramostim, and sequential sargramostim and filgrastim. Direct medical costs were calculated for inpatient and outpatient visits and procedures, including administration of growth factors and MC. We followed 156 patients for 30 days or until initiation of high-dose chemotherapy. The main outcome measures were resource use and costs of inpatient and outpatient visits, platelet and red blood cell transfusions, antibiotic use, and apheresis procedures. Hospital admissions, red blood cell transfusions, and use of i.v. antibiotics were significantly more common in the sargramostim group than in the other treatment arms. In univariate and multivariable analyses, total costs were higher for patients receiving sargramostim alone than for patients in the other groups. Mean costs in multivariable analysis for the filgrastim and sequential sargramostim and filgrastim arms were not significantly different. Filgrastim alone and sequential sargramostim and filgrastim are less costly than sargramostim alone after MC, as well as therapeutically more beneficial.

The CD3- 16+ 56+ NK cell count independently predicts autologous blood stem cell mobilization

Better predictive factors for autologous blood stem cell mobilization (BSCM) are needed. The purpose of this study was to determine if an independent association exists between lymphocyte or NK cell counts and BSCM. Data were analyzed on 141 consecutive patients aged 19-69 years (median 45) who received combined chemotherapy plus G-CSF for BSCM, and who had measurements of immune cells prior to BSCM. Of the 141 patients, 41% had breast cancer, 14% Hodgkin's disease, 34% non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and 11% other diagnoses. BSCM involved dose-intensive cyclophosphamide, etoposide, cisplatin (DICEP) plus G-CSF 300 microg (<70 kg) or 480 microg (>70 kg) for 45% of patients, while the remaining 55% received other chemotherapy plus similar doses of G-CSF. Only a single apheresis was performed for 94% of patients. The following factors were analyzed for predictors of BSCM: age, gender, prior chemotherapy, prior radiotherapy, diagnosis, disease status, marrow involvement, mobilization regimen, Hb, WBC, platelet count, B cell, T cell, and NK cell counts. The peripheral blood CD34+ counts on the first day of apheresis (PBCD34) were 6-1783 x 10(6)/l (median 150). The PBCD34 count correlated strongly with the number of CD34+ cells collected/l blood apheresed and with the number of CD34+ cells collected/kg. By multivariate analysis using continuous variables, relapsed status (P = 0.0003), not using DICEP mobilization (P = 0.0001), female gender (P = 0.0057), low platelet count (P = 0.051), and low CD3- 16+ 56+ count (P = 0.0158) were associated with low PBCD34 counts. Using categorical variables, the only factors that independently predicted a PBCD34 count <150 x 10(6)/l were: >1 prior chemotherapy regimen (odds ratio = 5.12, P = 0.0003), not using DICEP mobilization (odds ratio = 4.94, P = 0.0001), and CD3- 16+ 56+ count <125 x 10(6)/l (odds ratio= 2.58, P = 0.0157). In conclusion, the CD3- 16+ 56+ count may be a useful additional predictor of BSCM and warrants further study.

High-Dose Chemotherapy with Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Support for Operable Locally Advanced Noninflammatory Carcinoma of the Breast

The purpose of this study was to determine outcomes for patients with operable noninflammatory stage IIIA/B locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) with positive axillary lymph nodes receiving high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) support. One hundred fifteen patients with LABC who were no evidence of disease (NED) after initial surgery received standard dose induction chemotherapy, chemotherapy for mobilization of PBSC, and high-dose cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin with PBSC support for adjuvant therapy. Following hematopoietic recovery, all patients were scheduled to receive radiation therapy and tamoxifen was administered if the primary tumor was estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor (ER/PR) positive. Eighty-eight percent of patients were admitted to the hospital following HDC for a median of 11 days (range 3-26) and 12% were treated entirely as outpatients. There was one treatment-related death (0.9%) from infection occurring on day 8 after HDC. Forty-four (38%) have relapsed at a median of 20 months (range 10-55) from diagnosis, 11 (10%) with local-regional and 33 (28%) with metastatic disease. The probabilities of overall (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) for all 115 patients at 3 years were 0.73 and 0.61, respectively, with a median follow-up of 42 months (range 10-89) from diagnosis. In univariate and multivariate analyses, no factors could be identified that were statistically predictive for OS or EFS. However, there were trends for patients with ER/PR-negative primary tumors to have worse OS (p = 0.16) and EFS (p = 0.10) than patients with ER/PR-positive tumors. This adjuvant combined modality strategy incorporating HDC is safe and compares favorably to historical studies of neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment for LABC. Further attempts to improve outcomes of patients with LABC receiving HDC are warranted.

Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells following myelosuppressive chemotherapy: a randomized comparison of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim

Myelosuppressive chemotherapy is frequently used for mobilization of autologous CD34(+) progenitor cells into the peripheral blood for subsequent collection and support of high-dose chemotherapy. The administration of myelosuppressive chemotherapy is typically followed by a myeloid growth factor and is associated with variable CD34 cell yields and morbidity. The two most commonly used myeloid growth factors for facilitation of CD34 cell harvests are granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). We performed a randomized phase III clinical trial comparing G-CSF, GM-CSF, and sequential administration of GM-CSF and G-CSF following administration of myelosuppressive chemotherapy. We evaluated CD34 yields, morbidity, and cost-effectiveness of the three cytokine schedules. One hundred and fifty-six patients with multiple myeloma, breast cancer, or lymphoma received cyclophosphamide with either paclitaxel or etoposide and were randomized to receive G-CSF 6 microg/kg/day s.c., GM-CSF 250 microg/m(2)/day s.c., or GM-CSF for 6 days followed by G-CSF until completion of the stem cell harvest. Compared with patients who received GM-CSF, patients who received G-CSF had faster recovery of absolute neutrophil count to 0.5 x 10(9) per liter (median of 11 vs14 days, P = 0.0001) with fewer patients requiring red blood cell transfusions (P= 0.008); fewer patients with fever (18% vs 52%, P = 0.001); fewer hospital admissions (20% vs 42%, P = 0.13); and less intravenous antibiotic therapy (24% vs 59%, P = 0.001). Patients who received G-CSF also yielded more CD34 cells (median 7.1 vs 2.0 x 10(6) kg per apheresis, P = 0.0001) and a higher percentage achieved 2.5 x 10(6) CD34 cells per kilogram (94% vs 78%, P = 0.21) and 5 x 10(6) CD34 cells per kilogram (88% vs 53%, P = 0.01) or more CD34 cells per kilogram with fewer aphereses (median 2 vs 3, P = 0.002) and fewer days of growth factor treatment (median 12 vs 14, P = 0.0001). There were no significant differences in outcomes between groups receiving G-CSF alone and the sequential regimen. After high-dose chemotherapy, patients who had peripheral blood stem cells mobilized with G-CSF or the sequential regimen received higher numbers of CD34 cells and had faster platelet recovery with fewer patients requiring platelet transfusions than patients receiving peripheral blood stem cells mobilized by GM-CSF. In summary, G-CSF alone is superior to GM-CSF alone for the mobilization of CD34(+) cells and reduction of toxicities following myelosuppressive chemotherapy. An economic analysis evaluating the cost-effectiveness of these three effective schedules is ongoing at the time of this writing.

Characterization and outcome of "hard to mobilize"' lymphoma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation

A "hard to mobilize" patient was defined as one in whom >or= 1x10(6) CD 34+ cells/kg cannot be obtained after two consecutive large volume aphereses. Forty-four consecutive Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients who underwent autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplant treatment between June 1996 and June 1998 were included in this study. Twenty-one patients (48%) met the definition of "hard to mobilize" (Group I). All the rest of the patients (n=23) were the good mobilizers (Group II). The initial mobilization protocol for most patients was 10 microg/kg of G-CSF alone for both groups. For Group I, 7/21 (33%) patients were unable to achieve a minimal dose of >or= 1x10(6) CD34+ cells/kg even after a second mobilization attempt and/or bone marrow (BM) harvest (n=5). Overall, 11/21 (52%) required an additional mobilization and/or BM harvest. Only 3/21 (14%) patients were able to meet the target cell dose of >or= 2.5x10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (median of 4 apheresis). In contrast, 87% of Group II achieved the target dose with a median of 2 aphereses. Predictors of poor mobilization were greater than two prior treatment regimens (p=0.038) and the WBC count (<25,000/microL) on the first day of apheresis (p=0.053). Nineteen patients in Group I and all Group II completed treatment with a median time to engraftment of ANC>500/microl of 12 and 11 days, and platelet >20x10(3)/microl of 31 and 13 days, respectively. Outcome analysis revealed that 6/19 patients in Group I died of relapse within one year from transplant compared with only 2/23 of Group II who died of relapse (p=0.005, log rank test). There were no treatment related deaths in either group. Independent predictive features for "hard to mobilize" patients are a lack of significant increase in WBC count on the first day of apheresis and the number of prior treatment regimens. Poor mobilization appears to predict a worse outcome after autografting for lymphoma patients.

[Peripheral stem cell collection, search for predictive factors: a multicenter study. Working Group on Transfusion and Therapeutic Techniques of the French Blood Transfusion Society ]

AIMS

A multicentric study involving 12 centers was made to investigate the results of peripheral stem cell collection carried out between 1996 and 1997 from 655 patients with hemopathic syndromes or malignant tumors, The aim of this investigation was to determine the predictive factors for transplant quality, and to thereby optimize collection procedures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Information sheets were completed for 1,346 cytapheretic sessions, i.e., 655 grafts. The samples were taken after induction chemotherapy and exposure to hematopoeitic colony-stimulating growth factors (except the LMCs). Each graft was defined as being of good or bad quality depending on the number of CD34+ cells that it contained. Based on the data available in the literature, a workgroup consensus was reached that a level of CD34+ cells +/- 2.10(6)/kg recipient body weight constituted a good transplant criterion. The 2 subgroups (good graft versus lower quality graft) were compared by univariate analysis followed by discriminant multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

It was established that a number of parameters were significantly linked to the criterion of collection quality; however, 3 predictive factors emerged from the multivariate analysis--the level of circulating CD34+ cells; the number of cytaphereses; the number of blood volumes treated.

CONCLUSION

It was concluded that the level of circulating CD34+ cells seems to be an essential aspect in predicting the quality of the transplant and the number of cytaphereses required to obtain a sufficiently rich collection. Moreover, it also appears that at least 2 blood volumes should be treated to optimize the results.

Mobilization kinetics of peripheral blood progenitor cells after IAPVP-16 salvage chemotherapy plus G-CSF in lymphoproliferative disorders

We have explored the efficacy of salvage chemotherapy combination, IAPVP-16 (ifosfamide 5 g/m2 on day 1; VP-16 100 mg/m2 on days 1-3; ara-C 1.2 g/m2/12 h on days 1 and 2; methylprednisolone 80 mg/m2 on days 1-5) plus G-CSF for PBPC mobilization. This protocol was used in 45 patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoproliferative diseases who underwent 85 leukaphereses. In 41 patients > 2 x 106/kg CD34+ cells were obtained after a median of two procedures. The median number of CD34+ cells harvested was 3.2 x 106/kg per apheresis and 8.4 x 106/kg per patient. Seven of 10 patients who had failed previous mobilization attempts achieved more than 2 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg in a maximum of three aphereses. A history of previous mobilization failure and a low platelet count (<150 x 109/l) negatively influenced the CD34+ cell yield in univariate and multivariate analyses. A good correlation was found between the circulating CD34+ cells/microl and the CD34+ cells and CFU-GM in the leukaphereses products (r = 0.93 and r = 0.73, P < 0.001), and > or =17 CD34+ cells/microl predicted the achievement of > 2 x 106/kg CD34+ cells in a single leukapheresis in more than 90% of cases. IAPVP-16 plus G-CSF may be specially indicated in tandem transplantations or CD34+ selection and in patients who have failed previous mobilization attempts.

A phase I dose escalation study of high-dose thiotepa, melphalan and carboplatin (TMCb) followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) in patients with solid tumors and hematologic malignancies

The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of carboplatin administered with 500 mg/m2 thiotepa and 100 mg/m2 melphalan followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) infusion in patients with refractory malignancies. Twenty-eight patients with refractory malignancies received high-dose thiotepa (500 mg/m2, melphalan (100 mg/m2) and escalating doses of carboplatin 900-1500 mg/m2) followed by infusion of cryopreserved autologous PBSCs. The maximum tolerated doses were determined to be 500 mg/m2 thiotepa, 100 mg/m2 melphalan and 1350 mg/m2 carboplatin. Two consecutive patients receiving 1500 mg/m2 carboplatin experienced grade 3 mucositis and colitis. Ten patients were enrolled at the maximum tolerated dose and none had grade 3-4 regimen-related toxicity and mortality. All patients at this level experienced grade 1-2 mucositis, 90% grade 1-2 gastrointestinal toxicity, 30% grade 1-2 cardiac and renal toxicity, and 10% experienced grade 1 hepatic toxicity. The median time to achieve a granulocyte count of 0.5x10(9)/l was 9 days (range 7-12 days) and platelet count of 20x10(9)/l was 10 days (range 7-15 days). Of eight patients with stage IV refractory breast cancer, even were evaluable for response, one patient on day 75 will be evaluated soon. Five of seven (71.5%) evaluable patients achieved a complete remission (CR) and two had no response. Of seven patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 4) or Hodgkin's disease (n = 3), five achieved a CR (71.5%). Thiotepa, melphalan and carboplatin can be administered in high doses with tolerable mucositis as the major side-effect. This combination has significant activity in patients with breast cancer, and phase II studies in patients with breast cancer and other chemotherapy-sensitive malignancies are warranted.

Therapeutic relevance of CD34 cell dose in blood cell transplantation for cancer therapy

PURPOSE

To review recent advances in peripheral-blood progenitor-cell (PBPC) transplantation in order to define the optimal cell dose required for autologous and allogeneic transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search of MEDLINE was conducted to identify relevant publications. Their bibliographies were also used to identify further articles and abstracts for critical review.

RESULTS

The CD34(+) cell content of a graft is regarded as an accurate predictor of engraftment success. Postchemotherapy autologous PBPC transplantation with >/= 5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg body weight leads to more rapid engraftment than does transplantation of lower cell doses. Further increases in transplant cell dose further accelerate platelet but not neutrophil engraftment. Evidence that long-term hematopoietic recovery may be more accurately predicted by the subpopulation of primitive progenitors transplanted suggests that the content of CD34(+)CD33(-) and long-term culture-initiating cells in cell collection samples may be important for predicting successful engraftment, particularly in patients with poor mobilization. Allogeneic transplantation has been limited by concerns regarding graft-versus-host disease and the use of hematopoietic growth factors in donors. The risk of graft rejection and engraftment failure after HLA-mismatched allogeneic transplantation may be overcome by intensive chemoradiotherapy and the infusion of large numbers of T cell-depleted hematopoietic stem cells.

CONCLUSION

An optimal cell dose of >/= 8 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg seems to be recommended for autologous PBPC transplantation. This dose facilitates the administration of scheduled chemotherapy on time and reduces the demand for other supportive therapies. A combination of growth factors may enable patients with poor mobilization to achieve a collection sufficient to allow transplantation. The optimum PBPC dose for allogeneic transplantation remains to be defined.

Application of whole blood and peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) and new strategies for rescue after intensive cyclic chemotherapy in high-risk breast cancer

The efficacy of autologous peripheral stem cells given as mobilized whole blood or leukapheresis product for hematopoietic rescue after intensive chemotherapy was studied in 34 consecutive female patients with high-risk breast cancer. All patients received six cycles of chemotherapy regimen EC (epirubicin 150 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 1250 mg/m2) at 14-day intervals. In the first cycle, chemotherapy was given on day 1, and 24 h later mobilization of PBPC was started with G-CSF at a dose of 5 microg/kg/day for 13 days. In all other cycles, G-CSF was given at the same dose from day 7. On days 11, 12, and 13, leukaphereses were performed, and whole blood was collected on day 14 (the peak incidence of colony-forming units-granulocyte-macrophage [CFU-GM] burst-forming units-erythrocyte [BFU-E], and colony-forming unit-granulocyte-erythrocyte-macrophage-megakaryocyte [CFU-GEMM]). The second cycle of chemotherapy was started on day 15, and 24 h later, whole blood (collected in the first cycle) was reinfused, and the same was done in the third cycle. In the fourth to sixth chemotherapy cycles, leukapheresis product was used for hematopoietic rescue. The median increment of absolute values in both whole blood and leukapheresis product was as follows: CD34+ cells over baseline was approximately 17.4-fold, CFU-GM was 85.3-fold, BFU-E was 95.9-fold, and CFU-GEMM was 44.2-fold. In the cycles with whole blood support, the mean values of applied progenitors per cycle were CD34+ cells 1.52 x 10(6)/kg, CFU-GM, 1.18 x 10(5)/kg, BFU-E 2.54 x 10(5)/kg, CFU-GEMM 0.31 x 10(5)/kg. In the courses with PBPC support, the mean values of progenitors were CD34+ 2.04 x 10(6)/kg, CFU-GM 1.59 x 10(5)/kg, BFU-E 2.87 x 10(5)/kg, and CFU-GEMM 0.34 x 10(5)/kg. Leukopenia in patients supported with whole blood versus leukapheresed PBPC was as follows: grade 4, 13/6 (38.2%/17.6%), grade 3, 19/23 (55.9%/70.6%), and grade 2, 1/4 (2.9%/11.8%), respectively. Thrombocytopenia was grade 4, 11/6 (32.4%/17.6%), grade 3, 10/7 (29.4%/20.6%), grade 2, 7/13 (20.6%/38.2%), and grade 1, 6/6 (17.6%/17.6%), respectively. The median follow-up analysis was at 24.6 (7-36) months. High-risk patients previously treated with surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 5) were not evaluated for response. In 21 patients with locally advanced or inflammatory breast carcinoma the response rate (RR) was 94%, CR was 90%, and PR was 15%. No response to therapy was observed in 1 patient. In 8 patients with metastatic disease, RR was 75%, there was no CR, and PR was 75%. Two patients died during therapy. Relapse-free survival (RFS) in the adjuvant group was 23.7 (range 12-36) months and in the group with locally advanced disease was 18.2 (range 7-27) months. In the group with metastatic disease, time to tumor progression (TTP) was 12.1 (range 1-16) months. Mean duration of hospital stay for whole blood reinfusion in the second and third chemotherapy cycles was 6.7 (range 5-8) days and for PBPC in the fourth to sixth cycles was 6.2 (range 4-8) days, which at p < 0.001 was not statistically significant.

Randomized trial of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim after myelosuppressive chemotherapy for the harvesting of peripheral-blood stem cells

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim on CD34(+) cell yields and morbidity after myelosuppressive mobilization chemotherapy (MC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred fifty-six patients were randomized to receive filgrastim (n = 51), sargramostim (n = 52), or sargramostim for 5 days followed by filgrastim (n = 53) after MC with either cyclophosphamide and etoposide (n = 75) or paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide (n = 81).

RESULTS

Compared with those who received sargramostim, patients who received filgrastim had faster recovery of an absolute neutrophil count of 0.5 x 10(9)/L or greater (a median of 11 v 14 days; P =. 0001), with fewer patients requiring RBC transfusions (P =.008), fewer patients with fever (18% v 52%; P = 0.001), fewer hospital admissions (20% v 42%; P =.013), and less intravenous antibiotic therapy (24% v 69%; P =.001). Patients who received filgrastim yielded more CD34(+) cells (median, 7.1 v 2.0 x 10(6)/kg/apheresis; P =.0001), and a higher fraction achieved 2.5 x 10(6) (94% v 78%; P =.021) and 5 x 10(6) (88% v 53%; P =.001) or more CD34(+) cells/kg with fewer aphereses (median, 2 v 3; P =.002) and fewer days of growth-factor treatment (median, 12 v 14; P =.0001). There were no major differences in outcomes between the filgrastim alone and the sequential regimens. After high-dose chemotherapy, patients who had peripheral-blood stem cells (PBSCs) mobilized with filgrastim or the sequential regimen received higher numbers of CD34(+) cells and had faster platelet recovery (P =.015), with fewer patients (P =.014) receiving fewer platelet transfusions (P =.001) than patients receiving sargramostim-mobilized PBSCs.

CONCLUSION

It was concluded that filgrastim alone or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim were superior to sargramostim alone for the mobilization of CD34(+) cells and reduction of toxicities after MC.

Dose-intense paclitaxel, etoposide and cyclophosphamide: a safe and active regimen for tumor cytoreduction and stem cell mobilization in metastatic breast cancer

Patients with metastatic breast cancer in complete remission are the ones most likely to have an improved outcome with subsequent high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (HDC-PBSCT). Peripheral blood stem cells are usually procured following mobilization with single agent chemotherapy and colony-stimulating factor support. We utilized a dose-intense regimen of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 i.v., etoposide 60 mg/kg i.v., and cyclophosphamide 3 g/m2 i.v. (TEC) followed by daily administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. The aim was not only to mobilize stem cells but also to achieve optimal tumor cytoreduction prior to HDC/PBSCT. One hundred consecutive patients with metastatic breast cancer received 257 cycles of TEC between March 1994 and June 1997, with the aim of collecting 5 x 106 CD34-positive cells/kg usually following the second cycle of chemotherapy. Patient characteristics included a median age of 45 years, a median of two organ systems involved by disease, a median of two prior chemotherapy regimens and eight prior chemotherapy cycles, and a median interval of 8 months from diagnosis of metastases to first cycle of TEC. There were 61 febrile episodes during neutropenia and 13 of these were associated with bacteremia or fungemia. Mortality rate was 1%. An adequate number of stem cells was collected in 90% of patients. The overall response rate of the tumor was 58.8% with 23.7% complete responders among 97 evaluable patients. Multivariate analysis demonstrated chemosensitivity to the most recent standard chemotherapy regimen administered for metastatic disease, an ECOG performance score of 0 as opposed to 1, 2 or 3, and involvement by disease of only one organ system as significant variables for achieving a complete remission with TEC. This novel dose-intense regimen was safe and well tolerated, highly active against metastatic breast cancer, and capable of excellent stem cell mobilization. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2000) 25, 123-130.

The "G-CSF test": the response to a single dose of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor predicts mobilization of hemopoietic progenitors in patients with hematologic malignancies

A significant proportion of patients with hematologic malignancies fail to mobilize sufficient hemopoietic progenitor cells (HPC), thereby restricting wider application of autologous transplantation. It would be of considerable use to develop a test that could be used prospectively to assess an individual patient's capacity to mobilize HPC. Twenty-two patients with lymphoma, myeloma, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia were given a single dose of 12 microg/kg SC of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Blood colony-forming unit granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) and CD34+ cells were scored prior to the test dose, and 72, 96, and 120 hours later. The patients were then mobilized with a standard cyclophosphamide and G-CSF regimen and had blood stem cells harvested. Patients were categorized as good, poor, or intermediate mobilizers on the basis of the CFU-GM/CD34+ cell harvest content and the number of aphereses required to reach established threshold counts. The outcome of cyclophosphamide/G-CSF mobilization was correlated with the response to the test dose of G-CSF. Good mobilizers had significantly higher peak CFU-GM values and CFU-GM increment in response to the test dose of G-CSF compared to intermediate and poor mobilizers. A peak CFU-GM count of > or = 250/mL identified the good mobilizers; conversely, all poor mobilizers had a peak CFU-GM count of <102/mL. An increment in CD34+ cells counts of > or = 2.5/microL was only observed in good mobilizers. The "G-CSF" test is a reliable test that can be used successfully for the assessment of mobilizable HPC in patients with hematologic malignancies. It can also be used to stratify patients enrolled in trials of mobilizing agents.

Single-agent paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell support

The purpose of this trial was to determine the effects of paclitaxel in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic breast cancer scheduled to receive high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell support. Eighty-four patients received anthracycline-based induction and two doses of paclitaxel at 170 mg/m2 (n = 52) or 250 mg/m2 (n = 32). Eighty-two (98%) received cyclophosphamide and etoposide (n = 50) or paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide (n = 32) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells, and 79 (94%) received cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin with peripheral blood stem cell support. One patient (1%) died of infection and 56 (67%) died of progressive disease. For patients with measurable disease, the complete response rate was 21% after induction and 29% after paclitaxel (p = 0.54). Results were compared with those of 125 patients who received the same sequence of therapy without paclitaxel. The complete response rate after high-dose chemotherapy was 54% for patients receiving paclitaxel and 62% for those not receiving paclitaxel (p = 0.60). The probabilities of overall survival and event-free survival at 3 years for patients receiving paclitaxel were 46% and 24%, respectively, compared with 54% and 22%, respectively, for patients not receiving paclitaxel (p = 0.62). Further trials evaluating this dose and schedule of paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving high-dose chemotherapy are not warranted.

Factors associated with successful mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in 200 patients with lymphoid malignancies

Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) were mobilized and harvested in 200 patients treated for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 148), Hodgkin's disease (n = 22) and multiple myeloma (n = 30). The variables predicting the collection of a minimal (>2.5 x 10(6)/kg) or a high (>10 x 10(6)/kg) CD34+ cell count were analysed. Patients were mobilized with haemopoietic growth factors following either standard chemotherapy (n = 49) or high-dose cyclophosphamide, given alone (n = 55) or combined with high-dose VP16 (n = 86). 10 patients received haemopoietic growth factors only. The first mobilization resulted in a PBPC harvest with enough CD34+ cells in 179/200 patients (90%). High-dose cyclophosphamide, with or without VP16, did not mobilize a higher progenitor cell yield than standard chemotherapy. When performing multiple regression analysis in the 190 patients who received chemotherapy-containing mobilization, only the number of previous chemotherapy regimens and the exposure to fludarabine predicted for a failure to collect a minimal PBPC count (P=0.06 and 0.0008 respectively). The target to collect a high CD34+ cell count was negatively associated with the number of previous chemotherapy regimens (P=0.002). When only non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients were considered for multivariate analysis, low-grade histology with fludarabine appeared to be associated with poor PBPC cell yield (P=0.08 and 0.005 respectively). This data confirms that PBPC harvest should be planned early in the disease course in transplant candidates, and can be obtained after a standard course of chemotherapy.

A randomized trial of mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells with cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with or without cisplatin in patients with malignant lymphoma receiving high-dose chemotherapy

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the addition of cisplatin to cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for the mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). Eighty-one patients with malignant lymphoma were randomized to receive either cyclophosphamide 4 g/m2 and etoposide 600 mg/m2 (CE), and G-CSF 6 microg/kg/day (n = 41), or the same drugs with cisplatin 105 mg/m2 (CEP; n = 40) followed by collection of PBSC. Seventy-eight of 81 patients (96%) had apheresis performed and 70 (86%) received high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with PBSC support. The median number of CD34+ cells collected after CE was 19.77 compared with 9.39 x 10(6)/kg after CEP (p = 0.09). More patients receiving CEP had grade 3-4 gastrointestinal (p = 0.03) and neurologic toxicities (p = 0.05), had significant delays in recovery of neutrophils (p = 0.0001) and platelets (p = 0.009), and received more red blood cell (p = 0.03) and platelet (p = 0.08) transfusions than patients receiving CE. There were no significant differences in treatment-related deaths, relapse, survival, or event-free survival between patients receiving CE or CEP when all 81 patients or the 70 patients receiving HDC were evaluated. It was concluded that the addition of cisplatin to CE did not improve CD34+ cell yields, was associated with more morbidity and resource utilization, and was not associated with improvement in outcomes.

Second attempts at mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with initial low CD34+ cell yields

The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of second mobilization strategies in patients who yielded < 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ PBSC/kg after initial mobilization. Repeat mobilization attempts were made with chemotherapy and G-CSF (n = 61) or G-CSF alone (n = 58) in patients who failed initial mobilization with chemotherapy and G-CSF (n = 92) or G-CSF alone (n = 27). A median of 0.27 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg per apheresis was collected after the second mobilization, compared with 0.16 with initial harvests (p = 0.0001). Forty-eight percent achieved a target CD34+ cell dose > or = 2.5 x 10(6)/kg when harvests from the first and second mobilizations were combined. Fifteen of 17 patients (88%) with > or = 1.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg harvested after first mobilization had > or = 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg collected when first and second harvests were combined, as compared with 42 of 102 (41%) achieving < 1.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg with first PBSC harvests (p = 0.0001). Second mobilizations with chemotherapy and G-CSF or G-CSF alone resulted in similar CD34+ cell yields. Toxicities of second mobilizations were comparable with those of first mobilizations. Seventy-nine patients (66%) received high-dose chemotherapy with PBSC support, with recovery of neutrophils and platelets in a median of 11 and 15 days, respectively. Transplant-related mortality was 4%, and event-free survival at 2 years was 0.34. It was concluded that second mobilization attempts in patients who fail to achieve > or = 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg on initial mobilization were successful in 48% of patients. G-CSF alone was as effective as chemotherapy plus G-CSF in mobilizing CD34+ cells and was associated with less morbidity.

A randomized trial of two doses of cyclophosphamide with etoposide and G-CSF for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in 318 patients with stage II-III breast cancer

The purpose of this study was to develop a less toxic outpatient chemotherapy regimen for mobilizing peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). Three hundred eighteen patients with newly diagnosed stage II-III breast cancer who had received conventional dose adjuvant chemotherapy were randomized to receive intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide (2 g/m2), etoposide (600 mg/m2), and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 6 micrograms/kg/day (ID-Cy, n = 162) or high-dose cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2) and the same doses of etoposide and G-CSF (HD-Cy, n = 156) followed by collection of PBSC. Three hundred seventeen of 318 patients had apheresis performed, and 315 received high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) followed by PBSC support. The median numbers of CD34+ cells collected in a median of two apheresis following ID-Cy and HD-Cy were 19.9 and 22.2 x 10(6)/kg, respectively (p = 0.04). The fractions of patients achieving CD34+ cell doses > or = 2.5 or > or = 5.0 x 10(6)/kg were not different between the two regimens. More patients receiving HD-Cy had grade 3-4 nausea (p = 0.001), vomiting (p = 0.03), and mucositis (p = 0.04). The fractions of patients having a neutrophil nadir < 0.5 x 10(9)/L following ID-Cy and HD-Cy were 0.83 and 0.95, respectively (p = < 0.001). The fractions of patients having a platelet nadir < 25 x 10(9)/L following ID-Cy and HD-Cy were 0.13 and 0.51, respectively (p = < 0.001). More patients in the HD-Cy group received platelet (p < 0.001) and red blood cell (p < 0.001) transfusions and were admitted to the hospital more frequently (p = 0.03) than patients receiving ID-Cy. Three hundred fifteen patients received HDC followed by infusion of PBSC. There were no significant differences in the incidence of transplant-related death or early survival between patients receiving ID-Cy or HD-Cy followed by HDC. It was concluded that a regimen of Cy 2 g/m2 with etoposide and G-CSF was effective for mobilization of PBSC with low morbidity and resource utilization in patients with limited prior chemotherapy exposure.