A prospective, randomized, sequential, crossover trial of large-volume versus normal-volume leukapheresis procedures: effect on progenitor cells and engraftment

Evaluating the efficiency and safety of large-volume leukapheresis using the Spectra Optia continuous mononuclear cell collection protocol for peripheral blood stem cell collection from healthy donors: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Large-volume leukapheresis (LVL) refers to processing of more than three volumes of blood in a single session for peripheral blood stem cell collection. Recently, continuous mononuclear cell collection (cMNC) protocol has been developed using the Spectra Optia system, which is a widely used apheresis device. LVL using the novel protocol has been investigated in patients. However, the efficiency and safety of LVL in healthy donors using this protocol has not been characterized. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficiency and tolerability of CD34+ collection of LVL with the cMNC protocol in healthy donors.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected data on LVL (>3 total blood volume) and normal-volume leukapheresis (NVL) performed in healthy donors between October 2019 and December 2021. All procedures were performed using the cMNC protocol.

RESULTS

Although pre-apheresis CD34+ cell count was lesser in LVL (23.5 vs. 58.0/μL, p < .001), CD34+ collection efficiency was comparable between LVL and NVL (61.2% vs. 61.4%, p = .966). Platelet loss was significantly higher in LVL compared to NVL (38.0% vs. 29.4%, p < .001), with no correlation between attrition of platelet and processing blood volume. Moreover, the incidence of citrate toxicity during procedures was comparable between the two groups (31.6% vs. 21.4%, p = .322). All LVL procedures could be completed without any adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Allogeneic LVL procedure using Spectra Optia cMNC protocol was well tolerated by the donors and resulted in efficient collection of CD34+ cells, which was comparable to that of NVL.

Decision-tree algorithm for optimized hematopoietic progenitor cell-based predictions in peripheral blood stem cell mobilization

BACKGROUND

Enumerating hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) by using an automated hematology analyzer is a rapid, inexpensive, and simple method for predicting a successful harvest compared with enumerating circulating CD34+ cells. However, the optimal HPC cutoff count and the indicating factors to be considered for improved predicting have not yet been determined.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Between 2007 and 2012, a total of 189 consecutive patients who proceeded to peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) harvesting were retrospectively recruited. Baseline characteristics were analyzed to identify the risk factors for a failed harvest, which were defined as less than 2 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. Variables identified by multivariate logistic regression and correlation analysis for predicting a successful harvest were subjected to classification and regression tree (CART) analysis.

RESULTS

PBSCs were successfully harvested in 154 (81.5%) patients. An age of at least 60 years, a diagnosis of a solid tumor, at least five prior chemotherapy cycles, prior radiotherapy, and mobilization with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor alone or high-dose cyclophosphamide were independent baseline predictors of poor mobilization. In CART analysis, patients with zero to two host risk factors and either higher HPC (≥28 × 10(6) /L) or mononuclear cell (MNC; ≥3.5 × 10(9) /L) counts were categorized as good mobilizers and their harvest success rate was 92.3%. By contrast, 30.3% of harvests were adequate in the patients with three to five host risk factors and lower HPC and MNC counts.

CONCLUSION

A CART algorithm incorporating host predictors and HPC and MNC counts improves predictions in a successful harvest and might reduce the necessity of monitoring peripheral CD34+ cells.

Peripheral blood stem cell yield calculated using preapheresis absolute CD34+ cell count, peripheral blood volume processed, and donor body weight accurately predicts actual yield at multiple centers

BACKGROUND

Accurate prediction of stem cell yield is important for planning leukapheresis procedures. A formula has been published (Pierelli et al., Vox Sang 2006;91:126-34) to estimate the CD34+ dose collected on the first day of leukapheresis that was based on the preapheresis peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ counts, the blood volume processed, and the donor's weight. The aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of this formula.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Data were retrospectively collected on 1126 consecutive PB stem cell harvests conducted at five institutions. Information on age, sex, diagnosis, weight, preapheresis absolute peripheral CD34+ count, total blood volume processed, and CD34+ cells harvested per kilogram of body weight on the first day of apheresis was collected.

RESULTS

Among donors at least 18 years old, Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) between actual yield (AY) and predicted yield (PY) was 0.76. To characterize this correlation, AY and PY were classified as being within the conventionally acceptable CD34+ doses (>2 × 10(6) -5 × 10(6) cells/kg), below this range (≤2 × 10(6) cells/kg), or above it (>5 × 10(6) cells/kg). The positive predictive value (PPV) of PY was estimated considering the distribution of AY as the "gold standard." PPV was relatively high for PY of more than 5 × 10(6) cells/kg (85%), moderate for PY of not more than 2 × 10(6) cells/kg (72%), and low for PY more than 2 × 10(6) to 5 × 10(6) cells/kg (56%). A consistent pattern was observed within institutions.

CONCLUSION

The formula of Pierelli et al. is associated with a PPV that is high, moderate, and relatively low for the corresponding predicted CD34+ doses.

Successful mobilization, intra-apheresis recruitment, and harvest of hematopoietic progenitor cells by addition of plerixafor and subsequent large-volume leukapheresis

BACKGROUND

In patients failing successful conventional mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) plerixafor (Mozobil(®)) seems to be an alternative. We report a series of 14 patients with multiple myeloma or NHL successfully mobilized and harvested by plerixafor together with large-volume leukaphereses (LVL).

METHODS

In a first series (GI), 5 patients were mobilized with G-CSF and plerixafor. In the second series (GII), 9 patients were mobilized by chemotherapy, G-CSF, and plerixafor.

RESULTS

In GI and GII, addition of plerixafor led to a significant (p < 0.01) increase of leukocytes and CD34+ cells in peripheral blood (PB). In GII, the median number of CD34+ cells in PB before and after addition of plerixafor was significantly (p = 0.019) higher compared to GI (9 vs. 5 and 50 vs. 24 cells/μl, respectively). In GI and GII, a median number of three or one aphereses was performed. In GII, the median yield (6.7 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg) of the first apheresis and the median intra-apheresis recruitment of CD34+ cells were significantly (p < 0.05) higher compared to GI (2.94 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg). All patients transplanted, 5 in GI and 8 in GII, exhibited successful engraftment.

CONCLUSIONS

Plerixafor and G-CSF mobilization or the addition of plerixafor during non-optimal chemotherapy and G-CSF mobilization together with LVL enabled, independent of leukocyte count and even without detectable CD34+ cells before addition of plerixafor, sufficient harvest of HPC numbers for transplantation. Addition of plerixafor during chemotherapy and G-CSF mobilization led to an increased intra-apheresis recruitment and a significantly higher yield of CD34+ cells compared to plerixafor and G-CSF steady-state mobilized patients.

Optimizing autologous stem cell mobilization strategies to improve patient outcomes: consensus guidelines and recommendations

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) is a well-established treatment for malignancies such as multiple myeloma (MM) and lymphomas. Various changes in the field over the past decade, including the frequent use of tandem aHSCT in MM, the advent of novel therapies for the treatment of MM and lymphoma, and the addition of new stem cell mobilization techniques, have led to the need to reassess current stem cell mobilization strategies. Mobilization failures with traditional strategies are common and result in delays in treatment and increased cost and resource utilization. Recently, plerixafor-containing strategies have been shown to significantly reduce mobilization failure rates, but the ideal method to maximize stem cell yields and minimize costs associated with collection has not yet been determined. A panel of experts convened to discuss the currently available data on autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and transplantation and to devise guidelines to optimize mobilization strategies. Herein is a summary of their discussion and consensus.

Mobilization strategies for the collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells: Results from a pilot study of delayed addition G-CSF following chemotherapy and review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

Given the potential to limit cost, we conducted a pilot study evaluating delayed, low-dose granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) following chemotherapy for the procurement of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) for autologous transplantation and reviewed the relevant literature.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-eight patients with various malignancies received cyclophosphamide 4 gm/m(2) and paclitaxel 170 mg/m2 followed by G-CSF 300 microg/d or 480 microg/d starting day +5 until two to four daily large volume leukapheresis yielded > or =5.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells. We searched MEDLINE, Pubmed, and EMBASE databases from 1990 to the present to identify papers on PBPC procurement using delayed G-CSF (starting day +4 or later) following chemotherapy.

RESULTS

G-CSF was administered for a median of 9 days at an average cost of 1260 USD per 70-kg patient. Collection was initiated at a median of 12 days after chemotherapy. A median 2.5 (range 2-4) apheresis were performed yielding an average daily CD34+ collection of 6.9 x 10(6)/kg (range 0.35-56.7). After one apheresis, 82% and 57% of patients collected > or =2.5 x 10(6)/kg and > or =5.0 x 10(6)/kg, respectively. Ultimately, 89% collected > or =5.0 x 10(6)/kg. Febrile neutropenia and catheter-related infection developed in five and two patients, respectively. All patients proceeded to transplantation and engrafted successfully with a median of 14.9 x 10(6)/kg (range 1.05-113) cells infused. Eleven published reports were identified involving 590 patients of whom 498 received G-CSF at a dose range of 250 microg/d to 10 microg/kg/d starting day +4 to 15 for a period of 4 to 9 days for PBPC procurement. Among these reports, 62 to 100% and 33 to 96% of patients collected > or =2 to 2.5 x 10(6) and > or =5.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The use of delayed, low-dose G-CSF plus chemotherapy for stem cell mobilization was feasible and provides further evidence supporting this potentially cost-effective strategy. A review of the literature supports our findings and emphasizes the need for larger studies to address this issue.

Accurate prediction of autologous stem cell apheresis yields using a double variable-dependent method assures systematic efficiency control of continuous flow collection procedures

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Stem cell collection is a standard procedure for the procurement of autologous grafts to rescue myelosuppression induced by high-dose treatments. Accurate prediction of collection yields may contribute to optimize planning and quality control of collection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data of 313 autologous haematopoietic stem cell (AHSC) evaluable collections performed in 208 patients with haematologic and non-haematologic neoplasms from seven centres were prospectively analysed to test the accuracy of yield predictions generated by a formula that required the input of peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cell precount and desired PB volume to be processed. Data were matched in a standard linear regression, in a zero-point regression analysis and tested for prediction accuracy. Further 165 AHSC collections were analysed on a single-centre basis, using yield predictions as reference standards.

RESULTS

Analysis showed high levels of correlation between measured collection yields (my) and predictions (py) (R = 0.85; P = 0.000000) as well as high degree of prediction accuracy (my vs. py at paired t-test: P = 0.114781; median my/py ratio = 1.23). Analysis of additional 165 AHSC collections on a single-centre basis showed that the analysed centres had 70% or more measured yields comprising the 0.6-1.8 interval of the my/py ratio. The observance of the 'efficiency' my/py interval assured collection quality control in these centres confirming the reliability of the method.

CONCLUSIONS

This prediction method generates accurate and immediate yield predictions allowing collection planning and rapid efficiency control. As a consequence of our study, four centres out of seven use the described method to plan both leukapheresis number and single-procedure blood processing volume while the remaining three centres plan leukapheresis number on the basis of our predictions, maintaining a fixed single-procedure 200 ml/kg blood volume processing, according to their centre AHSC collection policy.

Progenitor cell recruitment during individualized high-flow, very-large-volume apheresis for autologous transplantation improves collection efficiency

BACKGROUND

Individual adaptation of processed patient's blood volume (PBV) should reduce number and/or duration of autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collections.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The durations of leukapheresis procedures were adapted by means of an interim analysis of harvested CD34+ cells to obtain the intended yield of CD34+ within as few and/or short as possible leukapheresis procedures. Absolute efficiency (AE; CD34+/kg body weight) and relative efficiency (RE; total CD34+ yield of single apheresis/total number of preapheresis CD34+) were calculated, assuming an intraapheresis recruitment if RE was greater than 1, and a yield prediction models for adults was generated.

RESULTS

A total of 196 adults required a total of 266 PBPC collections. The median AE was 7.99 x 10(6), and the median RE was 1.76. The prediction model for AE showed a satisfactory predictive value for preapheresis CD34+ only. The prediction model for RE also showed a low predictive value (R2 = 0.36). Twenty-eight children underwent 44 PBPC collections. The median AE was 12.13 x 10(6), and the median RE was 1.62. Major complications comprised bleeding episodes related to central venous catheters (n = 4) and severe thrombocytopenia of less than 10 x 10(9) per L (n = 16).

CONCLUSION

A CD34+ interim analysis is a suitable tool for individual adaptation of the duration of leukapheresis. During leukapheresis, a substantial recruitment of CD34+ was observed, resulting in a RE of greater than 1 in more than 75 percent of patients. The upper limit of processed PBV showing an intraapheresis CD34+ recruitment is higher than in a standard large-volume leukapheresis. Therefore, a reduction of individually needed PBPC collections by means of a further escalation of the processed PBV seems possible.

Cryopreservation of hematopoietic progenitor cells from apheresis at high cell concentrations does not impair the hematopoietic recovery after transplantation

BACKGROUND

The high number of nuclear cells (NCs) from hematopoietic progenitor cells-apheresis (HPC-A) requires cryopreservation in large volumes or at high NC concentrations. The effect of NC concentration during cryopreservation has yet to be examined.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In the experimental arm (n = 610, Protocol B), the first HPC-A sample from the patient was cryopreserved in two cryobags and subsequent collections in one cryobag, resulting in high NC concentrations (>100 x 10(6) NCs/mL) in most cases. The effect of NC concentrations at freezing in NC recovery after thawing and engraftment kinetics was analyzed and compared with a group of HPC-A cryopreserved at standard NC concentrations (n = 455, Protocol A).

RESULTS

The mean (SD) NC concentration at freezing was 78 (28) x 10(6) per mL (median, 82 x 10(6)/mL; range, 12 x 10(6)-156 x 10(6)/mL) and 183 (108) x 10(6) per mL (median, 156 x 10(6)/mL; range, 16 x 10(6)-678 x 10(6)/mL), for HPC-A cryopreserved according to Protocols A and B, respectively. The NC viabilities of the test vials and HPC-A components after thawing were 88 percent versus 85 percent and 85 percent versus 82 percent, and the cloning efficiency was 49 percent versus 33 percent for Protocols A and B, respectively (p < 0.001). Significant differences were not observed in the recovery of NCs. Days to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were not different between patients transplanted in the standard- (n = 143) or high-cell-concentration group (n = 238).

CONCLUSION

The cryopreservation of HPC-A at higher than standard NC concentrations has no adverse impact on hematopoietic reconstitution after transplantation.

Large-volume leukapheresis yields more viable CD34+ cells and colony-forming units than normal-volume leukapheresis, especially in patients who mobilize low numbers of CD34+ cells

BACKGROUND

Large-volume leukapheresis (LVL) differs from normal-volume leukapheresis (NVL) by increased blood flow and altered anticoagulation regimen. LVL is now regarded as a safe procedure for collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs), but it is not known whether the procedure will alter CD34+ cell quality or will be useful for patients who mobilize few CD34+ cells into peripheral blood.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The results from 82 LVL and 125 NVL (4.0-5.3 and 2.7-3.5 times the patients' blood volumes processed, respectively) were retrospectively analyzed in altogether 112 consecutive patients with malignant diseases.

RESULTS

The LVL yielded significantly more CD34+ cells (4.2 x 10(6) vs. 3.1 x 10(6)/kg, p = 0.006, all patients; and 1.8 x 10(6) vs. 1.3 x 10(6)/kg, p = 0.004, bad mobilizers) and significantly higher colony-forming units (77 x 10(4) vs. 33 x 10(4)/kg; all patients and 33 x 10(4) vs. 20 x 10(4)/kg, p < 0.001, both groups). Significantly fewer leukapheresis procedures were required to obtain 2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg (one vs. two, p = 0.001, all patients; and two vs. three, p = 0.009, bad mobilizers). No significant differences in CD34+ cell viability and time to hematologic recovery were observed between the patients who received PBPCs harvested by NVL and LVL.

CONCLUSION

Although a median platelet loss of 36 percent can be expected, LVL can be recommended as the standard apheresis method for PBPC collections in patients with malignant diseases. LVL is particularly useful in patients who mobilize a low number of CD34+ cells into the peripheral blood.

Apheresis techniques for collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells

The combination of effective mobilisation protocols and efficient use of apheresis machines has caused peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) transplantation to grow rapidly. The development of apheresis technology has improved over the years. Today PBSC procedures have changed towards systems to minimise operator interaction and to reduce the collection of undesired cells such as polymorphonuclear cells and platelets using functionally closed, sterile environments for PBSC collection in keeping with Good Manufacturing Practice guidelines. Blood cell separators with continuous flow technique allow the processing of more blood than intermittent flow devices resulting in higher PBSC yields. Large volume leukapheresis with the processing of 3-4-fold donor's/patient's blood volume can increase the number of collected progenitor cells. Therefore, intermittent flow cell separators are indicated if only single vein access is available. Anticoagulant induced hypocalcaemia is an often observed side effect in long lasting PBPC harvesting and monitoring of electrolytes should be performed especially at the end of the apheresis procedure to supplement low levels of potassium, calcium or magnesium. Refinement and improvement of collection techniques continue to add to the armamentarium of current approaches for cancer and non-malignant conditions and will enable future strategies.

Improving the efficiency of PBPC collection by pre-apheresis peripheral blood and mid-apheresis product measurements of CD34 cells

BACKGROUND

The adequacy of HPC collection for BMT is typically assessed by the number of CD34 cells. However, during a series of leukapheresis procedures (LP) the CD34 value on the final HPC product may not be available for testing until late evening, sometimes resulting in additional, retrospectively unnecessary, LP in order to ensure an adequate HPC collection (>5x10(6) CD34/kg). We hypothesized that an estimate of the CD34 content of HPC products prior to 16:00 h on the day of LP would permit improved HPC collection planning. We therefore assessed the effectiveness of predicting the total amount of CD34 cells that would be collected in a given LP by either (a) the concentration of CD34 cells/microL in peripheral blood prior to LP (pre-CD34) or (b) the predicted total amount of CD34 cells to be collected based on sampling the LP product at the mid-point of each LP. We also compared the number of LP per patient and total HPC collected for the study group with data from the previous calendar year.

METHODS

Allogeneic and autologous BMT donors who completed a 20-L HPC collection between September 2002 and February 2003 were eligible. CD34 cells were measured on blood drawn prior to LP and from the HPC product at the mid-point (10 L) of LP. The CD34 content of the final LP was predicted by doubling the value of total CD34 cells at the mid-run (MRp-CD34). The MRp-CD34/kg and the cumulative CD34/kg collected were made available before 16:00 h and used to determine the need for additional LP. The true CD34 content of each HPC collection was also measured from the final product the next day (CD34-FP).

RESULTS

A 20-L LP was completed and data were available from 31 patients and nine allogeneic donors who underwent a total of 85 LP for diagnoses, including 11 myeloma, 10 lymphoma, seven HD, three acute leukemia and five others. The mean (range) and correlation (R2) vs. the CD34-FP were, for pre-CD34, 54 CD34/microL (0.3-232), R2=0.66 (P<0.01), and for MRp-CD34, 3.2x10(6) CD34/kg (0.04-22.48), R2=0.90 (P<0.01). The mean number of CD34/kg collected per LP in the patients/donors was 3.4x10(6) CD34/kg (0.05-18.94). The median number of CD34 cells employed for transplant in the study group vs. controls (5.7 vs. 5.6x10(6)/kg) and the time to engraftment of neutrophils (12 vs. 11 days) and platelets (12 vs. 12 days) was similar to historical controls. However, the study group had a significantly lower median number of LP (three vs. two; P<0.02) to obtain the required collection of 5x10(6) CD34 cells/kg.

DISCUSSION

Both the pre-CD34 and the MRp-CD34 were significantly correlated with CD34-FP. However, the CD34-FP was more reliably predicted by MRp-CD34. Early availability of mid-run CD34 values was associated with a significant reduction in the number of LP required to collect 5x10(6) CD34 cells/kg, without reduction in the number of CD34 cells for transplant or prolongation of days to neutrophil or platelet engraftment.

Hematopoietic progenitor cell large volume leukapheresis (LVL) on the Fenwal Amicus blood separator

A technique for large volume leukapheresis (LVL) for hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) collection using the Fenwal Amicus is presented. It was compared to standard collections (STD) with regard to CD34+ cell yields and cross-cellular content. Optimal cycle volumes and machine settings were evaluated for LVL procedures. A total of 68 patients underwent 80 HPC collection procedures. Because of differences in CD34+ cell yields associated with peripheral white blood cell counts (WBC), the comparison was divided into groups of 20 with WBC < or =35 x 10(9)/L (< or =35 K) and those >35 x 10(9)/L (>35 K). Baseline CD34+ cell counts (peripheral count when patient started HPC collection) were used (median 18-23 cells/microl). Significantly more whole blood (corrected for anticoagulant) was processed with LVL (LVL 20 l vs. STD 13.5 l). For < or =35 K, median CD34+ x 10(6), WBC x 10(9), RBC ml, Plt x 10(11) yields/collection were 183, 21.2, 14, 0.8, respectively, for STD vs. 307, 22.1, 11, 1.0, respectively, for LVL. For >35 K, median CD34+ x 10(6), WBC x 10(9), RBC ml, Plt x 10(11) yields/collection were 189, 32.7, 15, 1.4, respectively, for STD vs. 69, 40.8, 21, 1.3, respectively, for LVL. We have described a method of LVL using the Amicus that, in patients with pre-procedure WBC < or =35 x 10(9)/L, collects more CD34+ cells than a standard procedure with acceptable cross-cellular content. This method is not recommended when pre-procedure WBC counts are >35 x 10(9)/L.

Reduction of adverse citrate reactions during autologous large-volume PBPC apheresis by continuous infusion of calcium-gluconate

BACKGROUND

Citrate-related side effects are common adverse reactions during PBPC apheresis. To reduce the incidence of citrate-related reactions, the effect of a continuous calcium-gluconate infusion on the appearance of hypocalcemic symptoms and on the subjective tolerance toward large-volume leukapheresis (LVL) was tested.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial was carried out in 50 patients undergoing standardized LVL at a median ACD-A ratio of 1.99 mg per kg and minute. Patients were randomly assigned to receive a continuous IV infusion of either saline or calcium-gluconate at a dose of 1.8 mmol calcium per hour. Subjective tolerance toward LVL was determined by standardized rating systems. Further, hormonal and electrolyte changes were monitored to assess the effect of continuous calcium infusion on calcium homeostasis.

RESULTS

Continuous IV administration of calcium-gluconate throughout LVL reduced the incidence of citrate-related effects by 65 percent. In patients who developed signs of hypocalcemia, the symptoms were weaker, and less medical intervention was needed to resolve clinical symptoms. The subjective tolerance toward LVL was superior in patients receiving calcium support compared to control patients. Continuous calcium infusion attenuated changes in serum phosphorus compared to patients receiving saline. No differences were observed in the variation of serum potassium and serum magnesium between the control group and the treatment group. The administration of calcium was not associated with technical problems related to the apheresis procedure, neither was any effect of calcium support on the total number of CD34+ cells collected observed.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that continuous support of calcium-gluconate during LVL is an effective means of reducing the incidence of citrate-related symptoms and improving subjective tolerance toward LVL, without affecting the technical performance or the number of CD34+ cells collected.

Mathematical model of peripheral blood stem cell harvest kinetics

A mathematical model of peripheral blood stem cell harvests was developed, taking two new parameters R (number of recruited cells/minute) and E(f) (efficiency of collection) into consideration in addition to concentrations and collected amounts of cells. This model was tested on 241 harvest procedures in cancer patients (chemotherapy+G-CSF stimulation), donors of allogeneic PBSC, and platelet donors, using different collection procedures, with a Cobe Spectra Cell separator. The relationships between preapheresis concentrations, R, E(f) and harvested amounts of cells were complex, and different for different harvest procedures and populations of donors. However, invariably, recruitment played an important role and contributed significantly to the final harvest in all types of cells studied. For example, for the patient group, mean recruitment was 1.3 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/min and the amount of recruited cells corresponded to 65% of all collected cells. Recruitment was significantly influenced by pretreatment with chemo-therapy and/or radiotherapy. The mean recruitment values for the subgroups with limited, moderate, and extensive pretreatment were 1.65 x 10(6), 0.87 x 10(6), and 0.32 x 10(6) CD34+ cells released per minute, respectively. The finding of a quick and massive recruitment phenomenon may stimulate further research into hematopoiesis in order to maximize harvested cells.

Prospective evaluation of cell kinetics, yields and donor experiences during a single large-volume apheresis versus two smaller volume consecutive day collections of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cells

We report cell kinetics, yields and donation experiences of 20 demographically matched allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) donors who were prospectively assigned to undergo either a single 25 l or two consecutive daily 15 l (15 l x 2) apheresis procedures. Procedures were performed using prophylactic intravenous calcium administration after standard granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) mobilization (10 microg/kg/d). Central line placements (two each), initial CD34 cell counts (0.077 vs 0.078 x 10(9)/l) and yields (7.9 vs 8.1 x 10(8) CD34 cells) were similar in the two groups; however, 25 l donors spent significantly less time both in the clinic (7.5 vs 10.8 h) and with central venous catheters in place (8.5 vs 29.5 h) than 15 l x 2 donors. End-procedure platelet counts were below 100 x 10(9)/l in one out of 10 25 l donors versus five out of 10 in 15 l x 2 donors (41%vs 53% mean decrease in platelet counts, P = 0.02). PBSC collection efficiency increased by 37% after 15 l of the 25-l volume had been processed, compared with no significant change during 15 l x 2 procedures. Results similar to these prospective findings were also observed in CD34 yields, symptoms and platelet counts in additional 25 l and 15 l procedures performed during the same period and evaluated retrospectively. This study indicates that a single 25-l apheresis procedure results in similar yields and symptoms, but less donor thrombocytopenia and inconvenience than two consecutive daily 15-l procedures.

Prospective, randomized, sequential, crossover trial of large-volume vs. normal-volume leukapheresis procedures: effects on subpopulations of CD34(+) cells

Some data exist on the influence of leukapheresis volume on the number of harvested peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC), but less is known about the influence on the composition of HPC. We therefore performed a prospective, randomized crossover trial to evaluate the effect of large-volume (LVL) vs. normal-volume leukapheresis (NVL) on subpopulations of CD34(+) cells in the harvest product of 15 patients with breast cancer and 8 patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Patients were randomly assigned to start either with an LVL on day 1 followed by an NVL on day 2 or vice versa. The number of HPC, the extraction efficiency defined as difference between yield in the harvest and decrease in peripheral blood, and the relative proportion as well as the absolute numbers of CD34(+) cells coexpressing CD38, CD90, HLA-DR, CD117, CD7, CD19, CD41, or CD33 were evaluated. There was no significant difference with regard to the percentages of the subsets on comparison of LVL to NVL procedures. Only the absolute median number of CD34(+)HLA-DR(-) cells was significantly (P=0.02) higher in LVL harvests compared with the corresponding NVL components, which can be explained on the basis of the higher yield and the higher extraction efficiency in LVL compared with NVL. LVL results in a higher yield of CD34(+) cells and leads to an intra-apheresis recruitment of HPC but the relative composition of the harvested CD34(+) cells is not changed significantly. In addition, the amount of early, HLA-DR(-), hematopoietic HPC seems to be increased by an LVL.

Change in CD34+ cell concentration during peripheral blood progenitor cell collection: effects on collection efficiency and efficacy

BACKGROUND

An understanding of factors affecting CD34+ cell collection efficacy is essential to minimize donor toxicity and cost.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Peripheral blood CD34+ cell (CD34) measurements were determined at various intervals before, during, and after automated cell collection (Cobe Spectra 6.0). The serial mean of multiple, intraprocedural CD34 levels was calculated for each procedure as an estimate of the mean, inlet-line CD34 level.

RESULTS

The CD34+ concentration fell a mean of 30 percent in the first 30 to 70 minutes of collection. The degree of decline was inversely correlated with donor blood volume (BV), but was not due to hemodilution. The mean of the CD34 level before and after collection slightly overestimated the serial mean CD34 level. Cell yields, normalized for the CD34 level before collection, were higher from donors with larger BVs.

CONCLUSIONS

The CD34 concentration rapidly decreased to a relative equilibrium level during the collection procedure. The degree of decrease in the CD34 level inversely correlated with the BV of the donor and was consistent with cell pooling in the collection set. The higher equilibrium CD34 levels in donors with larger BVs resulted in increased collection of CD34+ cells, and therefore, large-volume apheresis should be most efficient in these donors.

G-CSF Primed Autologous Marrow Harvest and Transplantation in Cytapheresis "Mobilization Failure" Patients: A Descriptive Analysis; Bone Marrow Transplantation

Fifteen cancer patients, deemed blood HSC "mobilization failures" due to CD34 + cell yields of < 0.5 x 10(6) /kg from two consecutive daily cytaphereses, underwent G-CSF primed autologous bone marrow harvest in an attempt to obtain adequate hematopoietic support for subsequent autotransplantation. CD34 + cell yields from the primed marrow harvest were variable; however, some patients had > 5-fold increases in CD34 + cell yields in the marrow compared to cytapheresis, and 4 patients had CD34 + cell yields of > 1.0 (i.e., 1.2, 1.44, 1.61 and 2.45) x 10(6) /kg from the primed marrow harvest. None of the five patients previously exposed to stem cell toxins or fludarabine achieved > 0.85 x 10(6) /kg CD34 + cells with the primed marrow harvest. A significant difference was noted between G-CSF primed blood and marrow for CD34 + cells but not for GM-CFU ( p = 0.011 and p = 0.135, respectively, paired t-test). All evaluable patients engrafted; a median ANC > 0.5 x 10(9) /L recovery was achieved on D + 12 (range + 9 to + 17) in 12 of 13 evaluable patients - one died on D + 9 without recovery. The last day of platelet transfusion occurred at a median D + 13 (range + 8 to > + 66); only one patient remained platelet transfusion-dependent beyond D + 34. As anticipated, patients with higher numbers of CD34 + cells transplanted had somewhat more rapid recoveries. Although stem cell damage is obviously a key factor in mobilization failure patients, these findings raise the possibility that poor mobilization, at least in some patients, results from a mechanism other than, or in addition to, simple stem cell damage. Moreover, they raise the issue of the minimum number of marrow CD34 + - or more arguably other - cells needed for adequate short- and long-term reconstitution. The role of G-CSF in this situation, especially regarding dose and/or schedule, is intriguing but remains to be clarified. G-CSF primed marrow harvest is a potential option in certain poor mobilizers but, as fully expected, is frequently inadequate. Whether such is preferable to "steady-state" marrow harvest, continued or repeated G-CSF primed cytapheresis (with or without chemotherapy), or primed marrow with G-CSF in other schedules - or with other cytokines - is unclear and will be the subject of further study.

Kinetics of PBPC mobilization by cyclophosphamide, as compared with that by epirubicin/paclitaxel followed by G-CSF support: implications for optimal timing of PBPC harvest

BACKGROUND

Limited information is available on the mobilization kinetics of autologous PBPCs after induction with various chemotherapy regimens. With PBPC mobilization in patients with breast cancer used as a model for chemotherapy-induced PBPC recruitment, the kinetics of progenitor cells mobilized either with cyclophosphamide (CY) or epirubicin/paclitaxel (EPI-TAX) followed by the administration of G-CSF was compared.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The study included a total of 86 patients with breast cancer (stage II-IV) receiving either CY (n = 39) or EPI-TAX (n = 47), both followed by G-CSF support. The progenitor cell content in peripheral blood and apheresis components was monitored by flow cytometric enumeration of CD34+ cells. PBPC collection was started when the threshold of >20 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per L of peripheral blood was reached.

RESULTS

The PBPC collection was begun a median of 9 days after the administration of EPI-TAX followed by G-CSF support, as compared to a median of 13 days after mobilization with CY plus G-CSF. After treatment with CY, the total numbers of PBPCs peaked on Day 1 of apheresis, and they rapidly declined thereafter. In contrast, treatment with EPI-TAX followed by G-CSF administration led to a steady mobilization of CD34+ cells during leukapheresis. The difference in the mobilization patterns with CY and EPI-TAX resulted in a greater yield of CD34+ cells per L of processed blood volume. Compared to EPI-TAX, mobilization with CY required the overall processing of 30 percent less whole-blood volume to reach the target yield of > or = 10 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg of body weight. After a median of three apheresis procedures, however, both CY+G-CSF and EPI-TAX+G-CSF were equally effective in obtaining this target yield.

CONCLUSION

These results imply that specific PBPC mobilization as part of a given chemotherapy regimen should be taken into consideration before the planning of a PBPC harvest.

A cell-kinetic model of CD34+ cell mobilization and harvest: development of a predictive algorithm for CD34+ cell yield in PBPC collections

BACKGROUND

Mobilization and homing of PBPCs are still poorly understood. Thus, a sufficient algorithm for the prediction of PBPC yield in apheresis procedures does not yet exist.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The decline of CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood during apheresis and their simultaneous increase in the collection bag were determined in a prospective study of 18 consecutive apheresis procedures. A cell-kinetic, four-compartment model describing these changes was developed. Retrospective data from 136 apheresis procedures served to further improve this model. A predictive algorithm for the yield was developed that considered the sex, weight, and height of the patient, the number of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood before apheresis, the inlet flow, and the duration of the apheresis. The accuracy of this algorithm was evaluated by comparison of the predicted and the observed yields of CD34+ cells in 105 prospective autologous and 148 retrospective allogeneic apheresis procedures.

RESULTS

The correlation between predicted and observed yields was good for the autologous and allogeneic groups with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.8979 and 0.8311 (p<0.0001), respectively. The regression is described by the equations log (measured value [m]) = 1.0118 + 0.8595 x log (predicted value [p]) for the autologous and log (m) = 2.226 + 0.7559 x log (p) for the allogeneic group. The respective equations for the zero-point regression are log (m) = 1.014 x log (p) and log (m) = 1.026 x log (p). The probability that the measured value was 90 percent or more of the predicted value was 83.8 percent for the autologous and 90.5 percent for the allogeneic apheresis procedures.

CONCLUSION

The predictive accuracy of the algorithm and the slope of the zero-point regression curve were higher for allogeneic than autologous PBPC collections. The predictive algorithm may be a useful tool in PBPC harvest, enabling the adaptation of the size of the apheresis to the needs of each patient.

Peripheral blood stem cell collection: the interaction of technology, procedure, and biological factors

Centrifugal technology, continuous flow and discontinuous flow, has served as the technology platform for extracting cell concentrates of interest from peripheral blood (PB) for patient therapy for the past 35-40 yr. Models for procedure outcome exist for collection of normal donor (ND) platelet and granulocyte concentrates that integrate: (1) biological variables (pre-procedure PB cell concentration, the total circulating quantity of cells, donor/patient blood volume (BV)), (2) device efficiency, and (3) procedure parameters such as total blood processed (TBP), and in the case of cytoreductions - the volume collected. (cf. Hester J, Kellogg R, Mulzet A, et al., Blood (54) (1979) 254; Hester J, Ventura G, J Clin Apheresis (4) (1988) 188.) To date, no predictive CD34+ yield algorithm integrating these three variables has been formulated that could be applied prospectively for individual ND or patients (PT). There are economic, toxicity and statistical comparison benefits to be derived from generating such an algorithm.A small pilot study is presented with a brief review of current publications that suggest the circulating quantity of CD34+ cells available to be collected and the quantity mobilized during leukapheresis are the major contributing factors to CD34+ yield, somewhat obscuring the role of the total blood processed (TBP). Intraprocedure CD34+ cell mobilization, incompletely characterized to date, appears to be a dynamic nonlinear process, as the harvested yield does not rise proportionally as the fraction of BV processed increases. And, like the pre-procedure PB CD34+ concentration and total circulating quantity, CD34+ mobilization during leukapheresis probably relates to prior treatment and the priming regimen. Studies that provide: (1) separate analyses of PT populations divided according to chemotherapy toxicity factors; (2) design and implementation of optimal priming regimens with respect to dose 'intensity' of both growth factors and chemotherapy; and (3) standardization of laboratory assays of CD34+ enumeration seem essential to generating a predictive algorithm.

A prospective, randomized, sequential crossover trial of large-volume versus normal-volume leukapheresis procedures: effects on serum electrolytes, platelet counts, and other coagulation measures

BACKGROUND

LVL procedures with the administration of heparin as an additional anticoagulant are increasingly performed because of the potentially higher yield of autologous peripheral blood HPCs. A prospective, randomized crossover trial was performed to evaluate the influence of leukapheresis volume-that is, large versus normal-on serum electrolytes, platelet count, and other coagulation measures in 25 patients with breast cancer and 14 patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to start either with an LVL on Day 1 followed by a normal-volume leukapheresis (NVL) on Day 2 or vice versa. In LVL, heparin was administered in addition to ACD-A. Bleeding complications, transfusion support, whole-blood counts, and several coagulation measures as well as plasma heparin levels were evaluated.

RESULTS

Although the duration, the infused amount of ACD-A, the flow rate, the drop in platelet count, and the drop in potassium were significantly greater in LVL, and although LVL patients also received heparin, there was no significant difference in clinical tolerance or bleeding complications. After LVL, patients exhibited a significantly longer activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), with a median of 70 seconds (range, 44-100 sec), and a median anti-factor Xa activity of 0.69 IU per mL (range, 0.10-1.29 IU/mL). The value of the APTT after LVL correlated with anti-factor Xa activity (r = 0.37, p<0.05), but not with platelet count or heparin infusion rate. Markers for coagulation activation did not increase during NVL or LVL.

CONCLUSION

LVL with heparin as an additional anticoagulant seems to be a safe procedure in patients with low preleukapheresis platelet counts. No activation of coagulation occurred after NVL or LVL procedures.