Assessment of infants with peripherally inserted central catheters: Part 2. Detecting less frequently occurring complications

Is Intravenous Access Necessary in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Ophthalmologic Examinations Under Anesthesia? A Prospective Observational Study

Purpose

Ophthalmologic examinations under anesthesia (EUA) were employed in pediatric patients due to lower cooperation levels and associated discomfort during comprehensive eye examinations. There remains uncertainty regarding the necessity of intravenous (IV) placement during general anesthesia. The primary aim of the study is to investigate the impact of general anesthesia, with and without IV access, on operation time in pediatric patients undergoing EUA. Secondary objectives include assessing cardiovascular and respiratory complications and measuring parental satisfaction in both the IV and No IV groups.

Patients and Methods

This prospective observational analytic study, conducted as a cross-sectional study, took place between October 2019 and October 2020, in Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. We included healthy pediatric patients aged 2 to 7 years undergoing elective ambulatory EUA.

Results

Eighty-two patients, with 41 in the IV group and 41 in the No IV group, were enrolled and included for analysis. The No IV group showed a significantly shorter median operation time (7.99 (6.63, 9.36) minutes) compared to the IV group (10.9 (9.05, 12.28) minutes), with a median difference of -2.74 minutes (95% CI -3.76, -1.69, p < 0.001). In both groups, no cardiovascular or respiratory complications occurred, and there was no need for emergency IV access or drug administration. Children without IV access had higher parental satisfaction in extreme satisfaction (100% vs 48.78%; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Providing general anesthesia for EUA without IV access in healthy pediatric patients, leading to shorter operation times and heightened parental satisfaction, can be conducted safely.

Clinical Trial Registration Number

The trial registration number is TCTR20191021001 from the Thai Clinical Trials Registry.

Complications of epicutaneo-caval catheters: Pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade in three preterm infants

In the neonatal intensive care units (NICU), epicutaneo-caval catheters (ECCs) are common alternative vascular routes. Pericardial effusion (PCE) and cardiac tamponade (CT) are rare but serious complications in infants with ECCs. It may be asymptomatic or present with a variety of significant clinical signs, including dyspnea, bradycardia, sudden asystole, and hypotension. If untreated, PCE can be fatal. This report presents, three cases of ECC-associated PCE/CT during NICU stay. All three patients were born before 30 weeks of gestation and weighed less than 1500 g. Echocardiography was used for diagnosis all patients. PCE/CT was detected incidentally in one patient and after hemodynamic deterioration in the other two. In one patient, CT was developed due to catheter malposition, and the other two patient, the catheter tip was found in the right atrium. PCE did not recur in any of the patients after pericardial fluid was drained and the catheters were removed. No PCE/CT-related deaths were observed. In all three patients, X-ray was used to evaluate the location of the catheter tips. However, after clinical deterioration, echocardiography showed that in the first two cases the tips were actually in the right atrium. Real-time ultrasound was suggested with strong evidence to evaluate the location of the catheter tip and to detect secondary malapposition. PCE/CT should be considered in the presence of unexplained and refractory respiratory distress, abnormal heart rate and blood pressure, and metabolic acidosis in a neonate with ECC. Early diagnosis and prompt pericardiocentesis are essential to reduce mortality and improve prognosis. Prospective studies with educational interventions should be designed to demonstrate that the use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) can be easily acquired and may reduce complications.

Octyl-butyl-cyanoacrylate glue for securement of peripheral intravenous catheters: A retrospective, observational study in the neonatal population

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based insertion and maintenance strategies for neonatal vascular access devices (VAD) exist to reduce the causes of VAD failure and complications in neonates. Peripheral intravenous catheter failure and complications including, infiltration, extravasation, phlebitis, dislodgement with/without removal, and infection are majorly influenced by catheter securement methods.

METHODS

A retrospective, observational study using routinely collected data on intravenous device use in a large neonatal intensive care unit in Qatar. A 6-month historical cohort was compared with a 6-month cohort after the introduction of an octyl-butyl-cyanoacrylate glue (CG). In the historical cohort, the catheter was secured using a semi-permeable transparent membrane dressing while in the CG cohort, CG was applied at the insertion site on initial insertion and after any dressing change. This was the only variable intervention between both groups.

RESULTS

A total of 8330 peripheral catheters were inserted. All catheters were inserted and monitored by members of the NeoVAT team. 4457 (53.5%) were secured with just a semi-permeable transparent dressing and 3873 (46.5%) secured a semi-permeable transparent dressing with the addition of CG. The odds ratio for premature failure after securement with CG was 0.59 (0.54-0.65) when compared to the catheters secured with a semi-permeable transparent dressing, which was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The correlation between the occurrence of a complication and the use of CG for device securement was significant (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of developing device-related phlebitis and premature device removal, increased significantly if CG was not used for adjunct catheter securement. In parallel with the currently published literature, this study's findings support the use of CG for vascular device securement. When device securement and stabilization concerns are most pertinent CG is a safe and effective adjunct to reducing therapy failures in the neonatal patient population.

Comparing conventional and modified Seldinger techniques using a micro-insertion kit for PICC placement in neonates: a retrospective cohort study

Objective

This study aims to assess the comparative effectiveness of a conventional splitting needle or a peelable cannula vs. the modified Seldinger technique (MST) by utilizing a dedicated micro-insertion kit across various clinically significant metrics, including insertion success, complications, and catheter-related infections.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study using an anonymized data set spanning 3 years (2017-2019) in a large tertiary-level neonatal intensive care unit in Qatar.

Results

A total of 1,445 peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) insertion procedures were included in the analysis, of which 1,285 (89%) were successful. The primary indication for insertion was mainly determined by the planned therapy duration, with the saphenous vein being the most frequently selected blood vessel. The patients exposed to MST were generally younger (7 ± 15 days vs. 11 ± 26 days), but exhibited similar mean weights and gestational ages. Although not statistically significant, the MST demonstrated slightly higher overall and first-attempt insertion success rates compared to conventional methods (91 vs. 88%). However, patients undergoing conventional insertion techniques experienced a greater incidence of catheter-related complications (p < 0.001). There were 39 cases of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CLABSI) in the conventional group (3.45/1,000 catheter days) and eight cases in the MST group (1.06/1,000 catheter days), indicating a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). Throughout the study period, there was a noticeable shift toward the utilization of the MST kit for PICC insertions.

Conclusion

The study underscores the viability of MST facilitated by an all-in-one micro kit for neonatal PICC insertion. Utilized by adept and trained inserters, this approach is associated with improved first-attempt success rates, decreased catheter-related complications, and fewer incidences of CLABSI. However, while these findings are promising, it is imperative to recognize potential confounding factors. Therefore, additional prospective multicenter studies are recommended to substantiate these results and ascertain the comprehensive benefits of employing the all-in-one kit.

Real-Time Ultrasound Tip Location Reduces Malposition and Radiation Exposure during Epicutaneo-Caval Catheter Placement in Neonates

OBJECTIVE

Epicutaneo-caval catheters (ECCs) are essential for the care of sick infants who require long-term medical and nutritional management. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of real-time ultrasound as an alternative to X-rays to reduce the incidence of primary malpositions during catheter insertion.

STUDY DESIGN

Data on ECCs were retrospectively collected in a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit. Catheter were analyzed considering the tip location technique (standard chest-abdominal radiograph vs real-time ultrasound) RESULTS:  A total of 248 ECCs were analyzed. Of these, 118 catheters had primary malposition (47.6%). The tip of 165 catheters was assessed using standard chest-abdominal X-rays and 107 (64.8%) were found to be in an inappropriate location. In the group of 83 catheters that were placed using real-time ultrasound for tip location, only 11 catheters (13.2%) had primary malposition. The rate of malposition among the two groups showed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). Hypothetically, 300 chest X-rays could have been saved if real-time ultrasound had been used to locate the tip, reducing radiation exposure to infants.

CONCLUSION

The use of a real-time ultrasound may be beneficial in reducing primary catheter malpositions compared with conventional radiography. In addition, secondary malpositions and catheter-related complications can be monitored over time.

KEY POINTS

· Conventional radiology cannot be considered the "gold standard" for ECC tip location.. · Ultrasound is more accurate and reduces insertion time reducing the rate of primary malposition.. · Ultrasound can be performed in real time and it is the best technique for ECC tip location in infants..

Unveiling Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Fractures and Related Complications in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Concise Review

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) have become popular over tunneled catheters in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) due to their ease of use and convenience. Although rare, a PICC fracture can be a severe and potentially fatal complication. This narrative review aims to identify factors predisposing neonates to PICC fracture and related complications, such as catheter jamming, and explore strategies for preventing and detecting this complication. A thorough search of PubMed and Google Scholar was conducted using relevant keywords to identify articles discussing PICC fracture in neonates. The review encompassed English-language literature on PICC fracture in neonates, with additional pertinent publications identified through citation searching. The incidence of PICC fracture in neonates varies from less than 1% to 10%, with a higher risk associated with prolonged catheterization, lower gestational age and lower birth weight, and the use of multi-lumen catheters. PICC fractures can occur during insertion, maintenance, or removal. Factors such as catheter duration, gestational age, birth weight, and catheter type increase the risk of PICC fracture. Excessive syringe pressure, securement failure, and excessive force during removal are contributing factors. Catheter fatigue and thin-walled catheter design are common causes of breakage. Preventive measures include proper training of healthcare providers, regular monitoring, early recognition, and prompt catheter removal upon fracture. Preventing and detecting PICC fractures is crucial for neonatal safety. Vigilance during insertion, maintenance, and removal, along with care to avoid excessive force during removal and high pressure during flushing, can help prevent catheter breakage. More research is required to improve prevention strategies for PICC fractures in neonates.

Role of a radiopaque agent and surveillance radiographs for peripherally inserted central catheters in newborn infants

BACKGROUND

Controversy exists regarding the use of a radiopaque agent to identify peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) tip positions in newborn infants and of serial radiography to monitor PICC tip migration.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the roles of (1) the injection of a radiopaque agent to identify PICC tip position and (2) the performance of weekly radiography to monitor PICC migration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective single-centre cohort study included newborn infants who received a PICC between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2020. A radiopaque agent was injected to identify PICC tip position and radiographs were performed weekly to detect PICC migration.

RESULTS

We identified 676 PICC episodes in 601 infants. A radiopaque agent was used for 590 of these episodes. There was no difference in the proportion of central PICC tip positions based on radiopaque agent use status (490/590, 83% for the radiopaque agent used group versus 73/85, 85.8% for the radiopaque agent not used group, P=0.51). Irrespective of the site of PICC insertion, outward migration was observed for most centrally placed PICCs over their entire in situ duration. Inward migration was identified in 23 out of 643 PICC episodes (3.6%) only on radiographs obtained on or before day 7. Based on serial radiographs, the odds for PICC tips remaining in a central position were lower the longer the PICC remained in situ (adjusted odds ratio-OR 0.93; 95% confidence interval 0.92-0.95). There was no difference in PICC migration between side and limb of insertion.

CONCLUSION

PICC tips can be identified without injection of a radiopaque agent. Serial radiographs identified PICC migration over the in situ duration. This study has implications for reducing exposure to a radiopaque agent and ongoing migration surveillance practices.

Mechanical complications of weekly care and maintenance versus once every 10 days of the peripherally inserted central catheter line insertion site in newborns: A propensity score-matched cohort study in Mexico

PURPOSE

To evaluate the mechanical complications of weekly care and maintenance versus once every 10 days of the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line insertion site versus once every 10 days in newborns.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Prospective propensity score matched cohort study. Care and maintenance of the PICC line insertion site were performed on days 7 and 10 during January 2018 to December 2019. To compare mechanical complications, propensity score matching was performed. Propensity scores were used to determine the relative risks and hazard ratios by using logistic regressions with log-link function and Cox regressions, respectively.

RESULTS

We included 175 newborns hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) who underwent insertion of a PICC line. Ninety-six received weekly care and maintenance, and 79 received care and maintenance every 10 days. Weekly care and maintenance were associated with more breakage (RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.68-2.34); occlusions (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.46-1.42) and accidental withdrawals (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.93-1.84) were not different between care and maintenance every 7 and 10 days. A survival analysis was performed, showing that weekly care and maintenance are a risk factor for removal for mechanical complications (HR 7.61, 95% CI 3.05-19.01).

CONCLUSION

We concluded that care and maintenance of the PICC in newborns every 10 days have fewer complications than when performing care and maintenance every 7 days.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Newborns requiring intravenous therapy will benefit from care and maintenance every 10 days, and this practice could potentially spread to other NICUs.

Cyanoacrylate Securement in Neonatal PICC Use: A 4-Year Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Within every neonatal clinical setting, vascular access devices are considered essential for administration of fluids, nutrition, and medications. However, use of vascular access devices is not without danger of failure. Catheter securement adhesives are being evaluated among adult populations, but to date, studies in neonatal settings are scant.

PURPOSE

This research describes the prevalence of peripherally inserted central catheter failure related to catheter securement before and after the introduction of tissue adhesive for catheter securement. The identified modifiable risks might be used to evaluate efficacy, to innovate neonatal practice and support future policy developments.

METHOD AND SETTING

This was a retrospective observational analysis of routinely collected anonymized intravenous therapy-related data. The study was carried out at the tertiary neonatal intensive care unit (112 beds) of the Women's Wellness and Research Center of Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.

RESULTS

The results showed that the use of an approved medical grade adhesive for catheter securement resulted in significantly less therapy failures, compared with the control group. This remains significant after adjusting for day of insertion, gestational age, birth weight, and catheter type.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND RESEARCH

In parallel with currently published international literature, this study's findings support catheter securement with an octyl-based tissue adhesive in use with central venous catheters. When device stabilization is most pertinent, securement with tissue adhesive is a safe and effective method for long-term vascular access among the neonatal population.

Charakteristika und klinische Manifestation katheterassoziierter Thrombosen bei Frühgeborenen

Hintergrund

In der Neonatologie sind peripher eingeführte zentrale Katheter ein häufiger Zugangsweg zur parenteralen Ernährung und Verabreichung von Medikamenten und Flüssigkeit. Die Vorteile stehen den Risiken wie Infektion, Thrombose und Fehllage gegenüber.

Fragestellung

Welche Charakteristika und klinischen Zeichen weisen auf das Vorliegen einer katheterassoziierten Thrombose hin?

Material und Methoden

In einer retrospektiven Betrachung aus dem Zeitraum 2010–2016 wurden alle Fälle von katheterassoziierten Thrombosen untersucht. Identifiziert wurden 10 Frühgeborene, deren Indikation zur Katheteranlage, Zugangsweg, Lage der Katheterspitze, Liegedauer, klinische Symptome und Krankheitsverlauf analysiert wurden.

Ergebnisse

Bei 10 Frühgeborenen mit einem Gestationsalter von 23 + 4 bis 34 + 5 SSW wurden 11 Thromboseereignisse beobachtet. Zehn der 11 Thromboseereignisse betrafen die V. cava inferior nach Katheteranlage an der unteren Extremität. Die Indikation zur Katheteranlage waren parenterale Ernährung und chirurgische Eingriffe. Bei 9 Patienten traten perinatale Komplikationen auf. Bei allen Patienten bestand während der Liegedauer der Katheter der Verdacht auf eine Infektion. Das Auftreten der Thrombose wurde nach 3 bis 27 Tagen sonographisch dokumentiert. In 8 Thromboseereignissen war eine Thrombozytopenie, in 4 Fällen eine Beinschwellung auffällig.

Diskussion

Das Patientenkollektiv zeigt Gemeinsamkeiten im klinischen Verlauf und bei den Symptomen, welche auf das Vorliegen einer Thrombose deuten. Auffällig ist außerdem, dass die meisten Thromboseereignisse das Stromgebiet der V. cava inferior betrafen.

Comparing the use of silicone and polyurethane Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in newborns: A retrospective study

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To compare polyurethane and silicone peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in newborns regarding the success rates of insertion and duration and the reasons for nonelective removal.

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have attempted to identify predictors of PICC complications in newborns, such as lower extremity insertion or femoral catheter insertion, procedures that require 60 minutes or more, duration longer than 30 days and non-central position of the catheter tip. However, there is little evidence on which type of PICC material causes less complications, especially in newborns.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort, guided by the STROBE tool.

METHODS

We divided the newborns into two groups according to the type of PICC material: polyurethane and silicone. Our sample was composed of 449 PICCs, of which 246 polyurethane PICCs and 203 silicone PICCs, inserted in 294 newborns. Bivariate analysis was performed for data comparison. All statistically significant variables in the bivariate analysis were included in the logistic regression (p ≤ .05).

RESULTS

Of the 449 PICCs that we analysed, the central position of the catheter tip predominated for both types of materials, with a higher prevalence of false passage for the polyurethane group. There was no difference between the average duration. The incidence of nonelective PICC removal was 49.27% for the silicone group, and infiltration/extravasation and rupture were among the reasons for nonelective removal.

CONCLUSION

The overall success rates in the insertion and duration of the PICC were almost identical for both types of material, despite the high incidence of false passage for polyurethane PICCs. Nonelective removals were higher for silicone PICCs, which also had a higher incidence for infiltration/extravasation and rupture.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Can contribute to the knowledge of the strengths and weaknesses of polyurethane and silicone PICCs, with a view to reduce the incidence of nonelective removals.

Time-Driven Cost Analysis of Noncuffed Venous Catheter Placement in Infants: Bedside versus IR Suite

PURPOSE

To compare the direct bundled costs of interventional radiology (IR) suite versus bedside placement of noncuffed central venous catheters in infants.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective review was performed of all noncuffed upper extremity (peripherally inserted central venous catheter [PICC]) and tunneled femoral (tunneled femoral central venous catheter [TCVC]) catheters placed in infants between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2018. Propensity score matching was performed adjusting for age, birth weight, procedure weight, and catheter days. Process maps for each procedure were created based on location and sedation type. Technical success and complications were recorded for each placement. The total direct bundled cost for each catheter placement was calculated by summing the procedure and complication costs.

RESULTS

A total of 142 procedures were performed on 126 matched patients with a technical success of 96% at the bedside and 100% in the IR suite (P = .08). The complication rates did not significantly differ between the 2 groups (P = .51). The total direct bundled costs for catheter placement were $1421.3 ± 2213.2 at the bedside and $2256.8 ± 3264.7 in the IR suite (P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The bundled cost of bedside femoral catheter placement is significantly less than that of fluoroscopic TCVC and PICC placement performed in the IR suite, mainly related to differences in sedation costs.

Parenteral nutrition extravasation into the abdominal wall mimicking an abscess

Objectives

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) are used in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) setting for medication and nutrition administration. PICCs are easy to place and may remain inserted up to several weeks. Serious complications are rare. Cases of infection, dysfunction, thrombosis, malposition into other vessels, catheter migration, vessel erosion, perforation into pleura, pericardium, abdomen and even into the epidural space with extravasation have been reported [1, 2].

Case presentation

We present the case of a preterm infant with a right leg inserted PICC with the tip supposedly being placed in the external iliac vein with further catheter migration into the abdominal wall during the course of treatment.

Conclusions

Our patient developed extravasation of lipid infusion, which was initially misinterpreted as an abscess due to signs of local inflammation.

Central venous catheters misplaced in paraspinal veins: A systematic literature review based on case reports

BACKGROUND

Paraspinal vein misplacement is an uncommon complication of central venous catheterization via lower extremities, most of which have been reported in case reports.

AIM

To determine the clinical characteristics of paraspinal vein misplacement.

DESIGN

This was a systematic review.

METHODS

A systematic literature search in the PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases was performed from their inception to 18 June 2019. Case reports and small case series describing central venous catheter misplacement in the paraspinal vein were included. Data on the catheterization procedure, catheter tip position, complications, and radiographic features of misplacement were extracted.

RESULTS

Thirty studies with a total of 36 patients were included. The ascending lumbar vein accounted for the majority of misplacements (n = 30), followed by the lumbar vein (n = 4), iliolumbar vein (n = 1), and vertebral venous plexus (n = 1). Six patients had eventful catheterization procedures. Twenty-six patients experienced misplacement-induced complications, of whom seven died. The most common complications included cerebrospinal fluid abnormalities, neurological symptoms, and deteriorated respiration. Among the entire case cohort, the onset of complications was the primary sign that alerted medical staff to misplacement (n = 23). The typical radiographic characteristics were posterior deviation of the catheter course overlapping with the spine on lateral X-rays and a bend, kink, or hump in the catheter course on anteroposterior X-rays at the L4 to L5 levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Nurses should be aware of this particular complication if a patient who has undergone catheterization via a lower extremity presents deterioration of neurological function and respiration.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Lateral X-ray radiography is an effective method to verify misplacement and is recommended as routine practice during catheterization via lower extremities.

Epicutaneo-caval catheters in neonates: New insights and new suggestions from the recent literature

Epicutaneo-caval catheters have been widely used in neonatal intensive care units since Shaw has described them in 1973. These central venous access devices are usually placed at bedside and they have the purpose of delivering parenteral nutrition and/or drugs that are not compatible with the peripheral route. Even though in the last decade there was a fast advancement in the world of vascular access devices, such changes have only marginally affected the field of neonatal venous access. The aim of this editorial is to give 10 recommendations that correspond to 10 novelties in the field of epicutaneo-caval catheter: some are already evidence-based and should be introduced in our daily practice now, while others are particularly interesting and deserve further clinical studies.

Feasibility and Outcomes Associated With the Use of 2.6-Fr Double-Lumen PICCs in Neonates

BACKGROUND

Low birth-weight infants' survival continues to improve and there is increased need to provide secure vascular access. This study examines safety of larger peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) that offer greater utility.

PURPOSE

To determine feasibility of 2.6-French (Fr) double-lumen PICCs in newborns and compare noninfectious complications such as thrombus formation, catheter breakage, infiltration, and accidental dislodgment and central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rate with that of newborn infants treated with 1.9-Fr single- and double-lumen PICCs.

METHODS

Infants requiring PICCs were admitted in our 69-bed level IV neonatal intensive care unit from September 2006 to May 2015. Two distinct groups were compared: the 1.9-Fr-(single-lumen [n = 105] and double-lumen [n = 27])-and 2.6-Fr double-lumen PICCs (n = 111). Data obtained included birth weight and weight at insertion, gestational age at birth and corrected gestation age at insertion, indication, catheter days, indication for removal, and complications: noninfectious and infectious. Univariate and multivariate statistical analysis evaluated data.

RESULTS

There were no differences regarding gestational age at birth and insertion and indications for placement of 2.6-Fr double-lumen (n =111) and 1.9-Fr both single- and double-lumen (n = 132) PICCs. The same was noted between the groups' complications. Noninfectious complications were more common in PICCs with peripheral tip location in all groups.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Consider use of 2.6-Fr PICCs in a neonatal intensive care unit when the utility of blood administration and sampling is required.

IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH

Examine line migration and CLABSI associated with sampling and blood administration.

A Systematic Ultrasound Evaluation of the Diameter of Deep Veins in the Newborn: Results and Implications for Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND

In adults and children, current guidelines recommend measuring the diameter of the vein before the insertion of central catheters, in order to match vein diameter with catheter caliber and thus reduce the risk of venous thrombosis. In the neonatal intensive care unit, central catheters are often used but the vein diameter is usually not considered.

METHOD

We assessed the diameter of the most relevant deep veins in 100 newborns, using a strict protocol of ultrasound evaluation.

RESULTS

Mean gestational age of studied infants was 32 weeks and mean weight was 1,690 g. The mean diameter of the brachiocephalic vein was consistently ≥3 mm, with no significant difference between the right and the left side. The femoral vein diameter, on the other hand, was considerably smaller than 3 mm for infants with a weight < 2,000 g. Interobserver repeatability was found to be very high.

CONCLUSION

Preprocedural ultrasound scan of veins is feasible and easy, also in newborns, and it should be recommended for optimizing central venous catheterization.

Extravasation of total parenteral nutrition into the liver from an upper extremity peripherally inserted central venous catheter

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) are the mainstay of central venous access in preterm infants, and one of the common procedures performed in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Complications of PICC include infection, mechanical dysfunction, thrombosis, migration, and extravasation of the infusate. In this report, we describe a case of PICC inserted from an upper extremity with migration into the inferior vena cava (IVC) and the hepatic vein associated with extravasation of the total parenteral nutrition (TPN) into the peritoneum and the liver. This case highlights the vigilance required not only to insert but for the maintenance of PICC to prevent complications associated with migration of PICC.

The Extended Dwell Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Is an Alternative Method of NICU Intravenous Access

BACKGROUND

Establishing vascular access is a common neonatal intensive care unit procedure. The extended dwell peripheral intravenous (EPIV) catheter is a 6-cm and 8-cm silicone catheter for peripheral vein insertion, which is a newer vascular access device than peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and peripheral intravenous (PIV) catheter. Extended dwell peripheral intravenous catheters have been widely used in adults but evidence in neonates is lacking.

PURPOSE

To explore indwell time, success rate, catheter-associated complications, and cost among EPIV catheters, PICCs, and PIV catheters in neonates.

METHODS

We retrospectively compare patient demographics, indwell time, success rate, and catheter-associated complications, and analyze the rate of hyaluronidase-treated intravenous (IV) fluid extravasation on neonates who had an EPIV catheter, a PICC, or a PIV catheter in a level III neonatal intensive care unit. We also estimate the insertion cost of these 3 vascular access devices on the basis of our hospital charges.

RESULTS

Extended dwell peripheral intravenous catheters were inserted in 432 neonates with an indwell time of 4.0 ± 2.3 (mean ± SD) days. Peripherally inserted central catheters were inserted in 202 neonates with an average indwell time of 7.3 ± 4.4 (mean ± SD) days, which was longer than EPIV catheters (P < .001). Peripherally inserted central catheters had a higher success rate of 83.6% than 71.7% of EPIV catheters, meaning succeeded in lasting through the completion of therapy (P = .001). Peripherally inserted central catheters were associated with 4 cases of life-threatening complications; none was seen in the EPIV catheter group. The incidence of hyaluronidase-treated IV fluid extravasation was less in EPIV catheter recipients (1.2%) than in the PIV catheter recipients (3.9%) (P = .004); none was in the PICC group. Cost savings were noted with using an EPIV catheter.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Extended dwell peripheral intravenous catheter is a feasible option for neonatal vascular access.

IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH

These data provide a baseline for future studies to explore the efficacy and effectiveness of EPIV catheter in the neonates.

Perforations associated with peripherally inserted central catheters in a neonatal population

BACKGROUND

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are increasingly used in neonates but perforations can result in devastating complications such as pericardial and pleural effusions. Identifying risk factors may guide surveillance and reduce morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the risk factors for PICC perforation in neonates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective case:control (1:2) study of neonates admitted between 2004-2014. Charts and imaging were reviewed for clinical and therapeutic risk factors.

RESULTS

Among 3,454 PICCs, 15 cases of perforation (incidence 0.4%, 5 pericardial effusions, 10 pleural effusions) were matched to 30 controls, based on gestation and insertion date. Timing of perforations post-insertion was median 4 days for pericardial effusions and 21.5 days for pleural effusions. A risk factor for pericardial effusion was lower weight at PICC insertion compared with controls. There were no statistically significant differences between cases and controls in catheter material, insertion site, PICC size and lumen number. Among upper limb PICCs, pericardial effusions were associated with tip positions more proximal to the heart at insertion (P=0.005) and at perforation (P=0.008), compared with controls. Pleural effusions were associated with tip positions more distal from the heart at perforation (P=0.008). Within 48 h before perforation, high/medium risk infusions included total parenteral nutrition (100% cases vs. 56.7% controls, P=0.002) and vancomycin (60% cases vs. 23.3% controls, P=0.02).

CONCLUSION

PICC-associated pericardial effusions and pleural effusions are rare but inherent risks and can occur at any time after insertion. Risk factors and etiologies are multifactorial, but PICC tip position may be a modifiable risk factor. To mitigate this risk, we have developed and disseminated guidelines for target PICC positions and routinely do radiographs to monitor PICCs for migration and malposition in our NICU. The increased knowledge of risk profiles from this study has helped focus surveillance efforts and facilitate early recognition and treatment.

Peripheral venous catheter complications in children: predisposing factors in a multicenter prospective cohort study

Background

Peripheral venous catheterization (PVC) is frequently used in children. This procedure is not free from potential complications. Our purpose was to identify the types and incidences of PVC complications in children and their predisposing factors in a developing country.

Methods

We conducted a prospective observational multicenter study in five pediatric and pediatric surgery departments over a period of 2 months. Two hundred fifteen PVC procedures were conducted in 98 children. The times of insertion and removal and the reasons for termination were noted, and the lifespan was calculated. Descriptive data were expressed as percentages, means, standard deviations, medians and interquartile ranges. The Chi2 test or the Fisher test, with hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI_95%), as well as Student’s t test or the Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare categorical and quantitative variables, respectively, in groups with and without complications. The Spearman test was used to determine correlations between the lifespan and the quantitative variables. The Kruskal Wallis test was used to test for differences in the median lifespan within 3 or more subgroups of a variable. Linear regression and logistic binary regression were used for multivariate analysis. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

The mean lifespan was 68.82 ± 35.71 h. A local complication occurred in 111 PIVC (51.9%) cases. The risk factors identified were a small catheter gauge (24-gauge) (p = 0.023), the use of a volume-controlled burette (p = 0.036), a longer duration of intravenous therapy (p < 0.001), a medical diagnosis of respiratory or infectious disease (p = 0.047), the use of antibiotics (p = 0.005), including cefotaxime (p = 0.024) and vancomycin (p = 0.031), and the use of proton pump inhibitors (p = 0.004).The lifespan of the catheters was reduced with the occurrence of a complication (p < 0.001), including the use of 24-gauge catheters (p = 0.001), the use of an electronic pump or syringe(p = 0.036) and a higher rank of the intravenous device in each patient (p = 0.010).

Conclusions

PVC complications were frequent in our pediatric departments and are often associated with misuse of the device. These results could engender awareness among both doctors and nurses regarding the need for rationalization of the use of PVC and better adherence to the recommendations for the use of each drug and each administration method.

Complication risks associated with lower versus upper extremity peripherally inserted central venous catheters in neonates with gastroschisis

PURPOSE

To compare the complication rates of lower extremity (LE) and upper extremity (UE) peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in neonates with gastroschisis.

METHODS

In this retrospective comparative study, neonates with gastroschisis admitted to a level IIId NICU between 2004 and 2013 were identified. Catheter dwell time and complication rates (infiltration, phlebitis, occlusion, migration, infection and thrombosis) between the initial UE and LE PICCs were compared.

RESULTS

Forty (31%) and eighty-nine (69%) neonates with gastroschisis had their initial PICCs placed from their LE and UE, respectively. Complication rates were significantly higher when PICCs were inserted from LE, especially during silo-reduction and within 5 days after abdominal closure (LE: 20% vs. UE: 3.4%, p<0.01). LE PICCs were 5.0 times more likely to have complications than UE PICCs (OR 95% CI: 1.2-21.5) during this time period. In particular LE PICCs had significantly higher rates of infiltration (LE: 11.5% vs. UE: 1.4%; p=0.025) and phlebitis (LE: 11.5% vs. UE: 0%; p<0.01) in patients who underwent silo-reduction.

CONCLUSION

LE PICCs are associated with significantly increased risks of infiltration and phlebitis in neonates with gastroschisis during silo-reduction and within 5 days after abdominal closure.

Thrombotic complications in children from short-term percutaneous central venous catheters: what can we do?

The reported incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in children has increased dramatically over the past decade, and the primary risk factor for VTE in neonates and infants is the presence of a central venous catheter (CVC). Although the associated morbidity and mortality are significant, very few trials have been conducted in children to guide clinicians in the prophylaxis, diagnosis, and treatment of CVC-related VTE. Furthermore, pediatric guidelines for prophylaxis and management of VTE are largely extrapolated from adult data. How then should the anesthesiologist approach central access in children of different ages to lessen the risk of CVC-related VTE or in children with prior thrombosis and vessel occlusion? A comprehensive review of the pediatric and adult literature is presented with the goal of assisting anesthesiologists with point-of-care decision-making regarding the risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment of CVC-related VTE. Illustrative cases are also provided to highlight decision-making in varying situations. The only risk factor strongly associated with CVC-related VTE formation in children is the duration of the indwelling CVC. Several other factors show a trend toward altering the incidence of CVC-related VTE formation and may be under the control of the anesthesiologist placing and managing the catheter. In particular, because children with VTE may live decades with its sequelae and chronic vein thrombosis, careful consideration of lessening the risk of VTE is warranted in every child. Further studies are needed to form a clearer understanding of the risk factors, prophylaxis, and management of CVC-related VTE in children and to guide the anesthesiologist in lessening the risk of VTE.

Peripherally inserted central catheters: use at a tertiary care pediatric center

PURPOSE

To examine the use of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in a tertiary care pediatric setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An observational study of use and referral practices for PICCs in a tertiary care pediatric setting was performed with three distinct approaches: (i) in an institutional overview of trends, data from 2001 to 2012 were initially analyzed to identify high-level trends; (ii) an in-depth analysis of PICC referrals during 1 year was performed to determine details of referral patterns and clinical practices; and (iii) an electronic survey of the perception and understanding of referring clinical staff was conducted.

RESULTS

During the past decade, there has been a steady increase in the number of PICC insertions and a decrease in median PICC dwell times. Discrepancies were identified between the anticipated versus actual dwell times. A large proportion of patients was found to have multiple PICC insertions, short dwell times, and premature PICC removals, potentially resulting in increasing risks of short- and long-term complications. Large percentages of the staff respondents valued the role of PICCs and had a good understanding of short-term complications, but underestimated the scale of the PICC service (numbers placed, resources involved) and several long-term complications associated with PICCs.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of PICCs inserted in children is increasing while PICC dwell times are decreasing. Better postprocedure care is important to minimize premature removals and avoid repeat insertions. Associated complications are not fully appreciated by the referring pediatricians. Further education and guidelines are needed.

Echocardiography allows more accurate placement of peripherally inserted central catheters in low birthweight infants

AIM

The use of plain radiographs provides limited information on the placement of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). Moreover, changes in upper extremity positioning cause migration of the catheters in neonates. This study aimed to investigate the use of echocardiography for determining catheter tip position, compared with plain radiographs, in low birthweight (LBW) infants in a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit.

METHODS

The study examined the placement of 109 catheters in 89 infants born between September 2010 and December 2012. The placement of these catheters was controlled by echocardiography, with the patient's shoulder in adduction and the elbow in flexion. The number of catheter tips, echocardiographically identified within the heart, was expressed as a percentage of the total catheters deemed to be well positioned on plain radiographs.

RESULTS

The number of catheter tips that were echocardiographically identified within the heart was significant (25%, p < 0.001). Twenty-three catheters were repositioned to be outside of the heart, without any complications.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated the value of echocardiography for identifying the positioning of catheter tips in LBW infants. Echocardiography, coupled with initial plain radiographs, should be the gold standard for assessing PICC tip positions in those infants.

Peripherally inserted central catheter complications in neonates with upper versus lower extremity insertion sites

PURPOSE

To compare peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) complication rates in upper versus lower extremity insertion sites in neonates.

SUBJECTS

Neonates who had PICCs inserted while hospitalized in an urban, 84-bed, level III neonatal intensive care unit in the southwestern United States between 2004 and 2009 were included in the study. A total of 559 neonates with 626 PICCs were reviewed. Neonates who were transferred out of the hospital with an indwelling PICC or had incomplete PICC data were excluded (n = 29).

DESIGN

Comparative descriptive.

METHOD

Retrospective review of PICC records. Demographic data, neonate survival to PICC removal, PICCs inserted by non-PICC team members, and complications were compiled. Complications included presumed sepsis, occlusion, leaking, infiltration/edema, inadvertent removal, phlebitis, pleural effusion, tip malposition, and catheter breakage. The complications were analyzed between extremities using chi-square or independent-samples t test where appropriate.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Type and rate of complication requiring PICC removal and the extremity used for insertion.

PRINCIPAL RESULTS

A total of 374 PICCs (59.7%) were inserted in upper extremities and 252 (40.3%) in lower extremities. The upper and lower extremity groups were comparable in all variables except neonate survival to PICC removal, which was greater in neonates with lower extremity PICCs (95.2% in upper extremities vs 98.8% in lower extremities; P = .01). No significant difference (P = .08) was found in the overall complication rate (27% in upper extremity PICCs vs 21% in lower extremity PICCs). Presumed sepsis was the most common complication requiring PICC removal in both extremity groups. At the time of removal, upper extremity PICCs were more likely to have a noncentral tip than lower extremity PICCs (15% vs 4%, respectively). In PICCs removed because of complications, noncentral tips were found to be statistically significant in upper extremity PICCs (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

No significant difference was found in complications that necessitated PICC removal between upper versus lower extremity PICC insertion sites. Catheter tip location may have a significant impact on complications and deserves further investigation. The choice of a PICC insertion site in neonates should be based on the quality of appropriate, available veins and the preference and skill of the inserter. Every effort should be made to achieve and maintain a centrally located PICC tip.

Fatores associados à infecção pelo uso do cateter central de inserção periférica em Unidade de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal

Estudo epidemiológico, longitudinal e analítico, desenvolvido em um hospital de Minas Gerais, com o objetivo de analisar os fatores associados à infecção pelo uso do cateter central de inserção periférica em recém-nascidos internados em unidade de terapia intensiva. A coleta dos dados foi realizada por meio de uma ficha estruturada, preenchida pelos profissionais e verificada pelos pesquisadores. Foram estudados 291 cateteres inseridos em 233 recém-nascidos. Os fatores associados à retirada por suspeita de infecção foram: prematuridade, peso ao nascer até 1.500 gramas, cateter de poliuretano, localização não centralizada do cateter e tempo de uso superior a 30 dias. Após ajuste multivariado, permaneceram independentemente associados: peso inferior a 2.500 gramas na inserção, reparo e tempo de uso do cateter. Conclui-se que fatores relacionados à prática dos profissionais contribuíram para a retirada dos cateteres, sinalizando para a necessidade de intervenções que melhorem a segurança e a eficácia em seu uso.

Complications associated with central and non-central venous catheters in a neonatal intensive care unit

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to compare complication rates between peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and peripherally inserted non-central catheters (PINCCs) in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective, observational study was conducted. The PICCs were catheters whose tip terminated in the vena cavae, and PINCCs were defined as those whose tip fell short of this location. Complication rates were assessed using generalized estimating equations modeling.

RESULT

A total of 91 PINCCs and 889 PICCs were placed in 750 neonates. In all, 44.0% of PINCCs had a major complication compared with 25.2% of PICCs (P=0.0001). The unadjusted (unadj.) complication rate among PINCCs was 51.7 per 1000 line days and 15.9 for PICCs (unadj. rate ratio: 3.25; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.32, 4.55). After adjusting for multiple confounders, the risk remained significantly higher for PINCCs (adjusted odds ratio: 2.41; 95% CI: 1.33, 4.37).

CONCLUSION

The rate of associated complications with the use of PINCCs in the NICU population is more than twice that of the PICCs.

Guide-wire fragment embolisation in paediatric peripherally inserted central catheters

OBJECTIVE

To report guide-wire fragment embolisation of paediatric peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) devices and explore the safety profile of four commonly used devices.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Clinical incidents involving paediatric PICC devices in Queensland public hospitals were reviewed. A PICC user-experience survey was conducted at five public hospitals with 32 clinicians. A device design evaluation was undertaken, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) safety was tested by a simulation study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Embolisation events; technical mistakes, multiple attempts and breakages during insertion; willingness to use the device; failure modes and risk priority rating; movement and/or temperature change on exposure to MRI.

RESULTS

Six clinical incidents of silent guide-wire embolisation, and four near misses were identified; all were associated with one type of device. The survey found that this device had a reported broken-wire embolisation rate of 0.9/100 insertions with no events in other devices; two of the four devices had a higher all-cause embolisation rate (3.3/100 insertions v 0.4/100 insertions) and lower clinician acceptance (68%-71% v 91%-100%). All devices had 6-17 identified failure modes; the two devices that allowed removal of a guide wire through a septum had the highest overall risk rating. Guide-wire exposure to MRI was rated a potential safety risk due to movement.

CONCLUSIONS

There is marked variation in the safety profile of 3 Fr PICC devices in clinical use, and safety performance can be linked to design factors. Pre-MRI screening of all children who have previously had a PICC device inserted is recommended. We advocate a decision-making model for evaluation of device safety.

Utility of bedside angiography in the evaluation of vascular obstruction in the pediatric intensive care patient

OBJECTIVE

To review our experience with bedside angiography in order to demonstrate the utility of this technique for evaluation of blood vessels in the critically ill patient.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Pediatric cardiac intensive care unit at a children's hospital.

PATIENTS

Five patients aged 5 days to 17 yrs in the cardiac intensive care unit at our institution received bedside angiography. Indications for bedside angiography included abnormal radiographic appearance of central catheter location or clinical suspicion of vascular obstruction. Institutional review board approval for this retrospective review was obtained, and the waiver of consent was approved by the institutional review board.

INTERVENTIONS

For angiographic evaluation of blood vessels, a radiographic plate was placed behind the area of blood vessels to be evaluated. Approximately 1 mL/kg of iohexol contrast was injected rapidly by hand into the blood vessel in question. Just at completion of the contrast injection, a radiograph was taken by portable radiograph equipment.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of five patients with potential blood vessel compromise were evaluated by bedside angiography. All angiograms clearly demonstrated the vascular anatomy and catheter location, in addition to identifying areas of obstruction and collateral flow. There were no cases of renal compromise due to contrast use and no blood vessel compromise from contrast injection.

CONCLUSIONS

Bedside angiography is a rapid, safe, and useful tool for the evaluation of complex vascular anatomy in critically ill patients. In cases where vascular ultrasound is unable to provide detailed anatomy or identify collateral flow, this technique may be useful in providing safe and accurate assessment of blood vessels associated with vascular access devices.

Neonatal PICC: one unit's six-year experience with limiting catheter complications

Safe dressing techniques for neonatal peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) remain controversial in the literature. This article describes one unit's experience with the placement and management of 491 PICCs during a six-year period with more than 5,600 catheter days. The dressing technique described in this article differs from that seen in the literature with the addition of a protective base layer. Catheter complication rates are low, and catheter dressing changes are minimized with this dressing technique.

Repositioning techniques for malpositioned neonatal peripherally inserted central catheters

The utilization of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters (PICCs) has grown to become a common practice in neonatal care. Proper placement of the catheter in the superior vena cava (SVC) is essential to support safe delivery of care and minimize complications. This article describes three cases of patients whose catheters were malpositioned on initial placement or while in situ, that were successfully guided to appropriate tip location in the superior vena cava by implementing a combination of non-invasive catheter repositioning techniques.

Iatrogenic chylothorax due to pleural cavity extravasation of total parenteral nutrition in two adults receiving nutrition through a peripherally inserted central catheter

Extravasation of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) delivered via central lines is a known potential complication, but significant extravasations of infusate into the pleural space when using peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) have not been reported in adults. We report 2 cases ofpleural cavity extravasation ofTPN delivered via a PICC. Measurement of the glucose level of the effusate is a quick way to determine the presence of TPN and should be considered in any patient receiving TPN via any type of central line with a rapidly developing effusion.

Are supine chest and abdominal radiographs the best way to confirm PICC placement in neonates?

BACKGROUND

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are commonly used in NICUs. Although they have many benefits, they also have many potential complications. Confirming catheter tip position is essential to decreasing complications, but the best method to achieve confirmation is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

Literature review for studies that address line position confirmation to assist health care providers in evaluating the available research and to identify gaps in the literature.

METHOD

A literature search of four major databases followed by an ancestry approach was performed. Articles reviewed specifically discuss PICC lines and PICC line placement confirmation.

RESULTS

Data on confirming PICC placement were lacking. Fluoroscopic placement is ideal, but cannot be done at the bedside and is costly. Supine chest radiograph is the most widely used method and is convenient, but when line tip position is unclear, contrast or ultrasound confirmation can be used. When PICC lines are placed in the saphenous vein, infants may benefit from supine and lateral abdominal radiographs to ensure placement in the inferior vena cava.

DISCUSSION

More studies are needed to generalize findings. PICC line tips should be located in the superior vena cava or inferior vena cava close to the junction with the right atrium (0.5-1 cm outside of the cardiac chambers in premature infants and 1-2 cm outside of the cardiac chambers in larger infants). Arm position is very important when performing radiographs for placement because movement of the arm can cause migration of the catheter. There is also significant inter-observer variability when identifying line tip position.

Cardiac tamponade and successful pericardiocentesis in an extremely low birth weight neonate with percutaneously inserted central venous line: a case report

Background

Pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade are rare but life-threatening complications of percutaneosuly inserted central line (PICL) use in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) neonates, with an incidence reported between 0.07% and 2% of PICLs placement. Timely diagnosis and pericardiocentesis has been proven to be life-saving.

Case presentation

The patient was a 620 g birth weight neonate who presented with sudden cardiac instability 18 days after the insertion of a PICL and in spite of a presumed satisfactory position of the catheter tip.

The transthoracic echocardiography demonstrated severe pericardial effusion with evidence of cardiac tamponade.

Successful urgent subxiphoid pericardiocentesis was performed; totally 2 ml of whitish fluid was collected, which resulted consistent to the composition of the hyperosmolar TPN solution infused.

Conclusion

Cardiac tamponade should be considered in any newborn with a peripherally inserted central catheter who presents with cardiorespiratory instability (bradycardia, cyanosis and metabolic acidosis), even when lines are believed to be placed correctly.

Neonatal peripherally inserted central catheters: recommendations for prevention of insertion and postinsertion complications

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) continue to be necessary in neonatal care. They benefit many premature infants and those needing long-term intravenous access. An experienced inserter, early recognition of PICC candidates, early PICC placement, knowledge of anatomy, and correct choice of vein all increase placement success. As with any invasive procedure, there are risks. These include pain, difficulty advancing the catheter, damage to vessels, catheter malposition, and bleeding. Utilizing assessment skills, following the product manufacturer's instructions, and carefully placing the catheter should minimize most of these risks. Additional risks include postinsertion complications such as occlusions, thrombosis, catheter failure, infection, and catheter malposition. Proper nursing care--which includes controlling infection, properly securing the catheter, and changing the dressing as needed--is key to preventing complications and maintaining the PICC until treatment has been completed.

Tiny patients, tiny dressings: a guide to the neonatal PICC dressing change

Advances in neonatology now support the survival of the tiniest of infants. The peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) has now become an integral part of routine practice in neonatal intensive care units around the world. Keen attention to safe maintenance of these devices is essential. A properly applied and maintained PICC dressing is the first line of defense to minimize the risk of complications such as dislodgement, migration, and infection. This article describes a neonatal PICC dressing change and discusses the frequently encountered quandaries surrounding this important procedure, including dressing materials, frequency, site preparation, barrier precautions, and other relevant concerns.

Retained central venous lines in the newborn: report of one case and systematic review of the literature

The use of percutaneously inserted central catheters (PICCs) is an established practice in most NICUs. With the widespread use of these catheters, an increasing number of PICC complications has been reported in neonates. We present one case of a PICC retained and tethered in the vein in a very low birth weight infant, as well as a systematic review of PICC retention cases. Ten previous cases of PICC retention in neonates were found. Among those cases, the most common associated factors were coagulase-negative staphylococcus catheter colonization/bactcremia and long duration of catheterization. Occlusion was not a usefiul sign for predicting catheter retention. Once retention was established, heparin or urokinase instillations were ineffective. Although surgical exploration was sometimes required, firm, continuous traction applied to the catheter over several hours or intermittent, moderately strong pulling maneuvers were successful in 44.4 percent of the cases in which they were performed. Traction did not show major side effects. Our case provides additional support for use of traction as the initial approach in the management of this rare complication.

Neonatal peripherally inserted central catheter team. Evolution and outcomes of a bedside-nurse-designed program

Percutaneously inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) have been used to provide central venous access for more than 25 years. Although these lines initially were placed by physicians, currently there are many adult, pediatric, and neonatal nurse-based PICC teams. This article describes the inception and growth of 1 team which, during the last 14 years, has placed more than 3400 catheters and trained more than 50 bedside nurses to insert PICCs. It highlights the development of the team, including details of how team members were selected and trained. Management of ongoing issues was handled by a self-directed nurse team organized into a committee structure composed of an oversight committee and education, guideline, qualifications, and quality improvement subcommittees. This team set and achieved the goals of training bedside nurses to place PICCs, providing consistent management of PICCs, and closely monitoring outcomes.

Midline catheter use in the intensive care nursery

PURPOSE

To describe the use of midline catheters in a Level IV, 48-bed NICU over a four-and-a-half-year period.

DESIGN

Nonrandomized prospective review of data obtained for quality assurance monitoring.

SAMPLE

1,130 catheters inserted in 858 patients ranging in age at insertion from 1 to 249 days, 360-8,000 gm in weight, and 23-42 weeks gestational age at birth.

OUTCOME VARIABLES

Catheter outcome data related to dwell times; patient characteristics; insertion site; and reason for removal, including failure related to infiltration, leaking, occlusion, dislodgment, infection, phlebitis, or malposition.

RESULTS

There was no significant statistical difference in median catheter survival times related to weight or postconceptional age. Overall mean catheter dwell time was 8.7 days. Scalp was the most common insertion site (49 percent), and the site with the longest dwell time was the saphenous vein at the knee, which lasted a mean of 12.9 days. Elective removal represented 43 percent of all removals. Incidence of positive blood culture was 3.5 percent (0.41/1,000 catheter days), with the risk significantly higher if a central line was also in place.

Atrial flutter in a premature infant with a structurally normal heart

Isolated postnatal atrial flutter (AF) with a structurally normal heart is rare in the neonatal period. Central lines have their inherent risks and are frequently used in the management of growing premature newborns. Some new antimicrobial agents do have pro-arrhythmic effects, proven in adults but with limited data available for the newborn. We present a case of atrial flutter with 2:1 block in a 1-month-old premature baby with possible contribution from an intra-cardiac catheter and/or use of a broad spectrum antimicrobial.