Role of renal allograft biopsy in multicenter clinical trials in transplantation

Practice Patterns in the Treatment and Monitoring of Acute T Cell-Mediated Kidney Graft Rejection in Canada

Background

One of the goals of the Canadian National Transplant Research Program (CNTRP) is to develop novel therapies for acute rejection that could positively affect graft outcomes with greater efficacy or less toxicity. To develop innovative management strategies for kidney graft rejection, new modalities need to be compared with current clinical practices. However, there are no standardized practices concerning the management of acute T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR).

Objectives

To describe clinicians' practice patterns in the diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of acute TCMR in Canada.

Design

Survey.

Setting Patients/Participants

Canadian transplant nephrologists and transplant surgeons involved in the management of acute TCMR.

Methods and Measurements

We developed an anonymous, web-based survey consisting of questions related to the diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of TCMR. The survey was disseminated on 3 occasions between June and October 2016 through the Canadian Society of Transplantation (CST) kidney group electronic mailing list.

Results

Forty-seven respondents, mostly transplant nephrologists (97%), originating from at least 18 of the 25 Canadian centers offering adult or pediatric kidney transplantation, participated in the study. Surveillance biopsies were used by 28% of respondents to screen for kidney graft rejection. High-dose steroids were used by most of the respondents to treat clinical and subclinical Banff grade 1A and 1B rejections. Nine percent (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1-17) of practitioners used lymphocyte-depleting agents as the first-line approach for the treatment of Banff grade 1B acute rejection. Eighteen percent (95% CI: 7-29) and 36% (95% CI: 8-65) of respondents reported that they would not use high-dose steroids for treating clinical and subclinical borderline rejections, respectively. Seventy percent (95% CI: 54-83) of respondents answered that there was no indication to assess histological response to treatment independent of the change in kidney function.

Limitations

The limitations of this study are its limited sample size and the low representation of pediatric specialists.

Conclusions

There is heterogeneity regarding the use of surveillance biopsies, treatment of borderline rejection, and modalities to monitor treatment response among transplant physicians. Our results illustrate the current state of practice patterns across Canada and can be used to inform the design of future trials.

Biopsy of the transplanted kidney

This article describes the current state-of-the-art technique of percutaneous transplant renal biopsy. A brief overview of the history of transplant renal biopsy is given. The indications and contraindications are discussed, including pre- and postprocedure patient management. The technique of the procedure and the devices that are available in the market are described.

Inflammation lesions in kidney transplant biopsies: association with survival is due to the underlying diseases

Assessment of kidney transplant biopsies relies on nonspecific inflammatory lesions: Interstitial infiltrates (i), tubulitis (t) and intimal arteritis (v). We studied the relationship between inflammation and prognosis in biopsies for clinical indications from 314 patients (median follow-up 25 months). We used a modified Banff classification, separately assessing inflammation (i-) in nonscarred (i-Banff), scarred (i-IFTA) and whole cortex (i-total), plus tubulitis and intimal arteritis. In early biopsies (<1 year), i- and t-lesions had no association with graft survival. In late (>1 year) biopsies, all i-scores correlated with progression to failure, due to the association of these infiltrates with progressive diseases: antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and glomerulonephritis. Tubulitis in nonscarred areas had no impact on survival. Severe tubulitis including scarred areas (tis3) was associated with worse survival, but reflected polyoma virus nephropathy or ABMR, not T-cell-mediated rejection. Intimal arteritis (v-lesions) had no association with allograft loss in early or late biopsies. In multivariate analysis, outcome was better predicted by the presence of progressive disease than by inflammation. Thus inflammation in late kidney transplants has no inherent prognostic impact, but predicts reduced survival because inflammation indicates actively progressing diseases. The most important predictor of outcome is the diagnosis of a progressive disease.

Functional genomic analysis of peripheral blood during early acute renal allograft rejection

BACKGROUND

Acute graft rejection is an important clinical problem in renal transplantation and an adverse predictor for long-term graft survival. Peripheral blood biomarkers that provide evidence of early graft rejection may offer an important option for posttransplant monitoring, optimize the utility of graft biopsy, and permit timely and effective therapeutic intervention to minimize the graft damage.

METHODS

In this feasibility study (n=58), we have used gene expression profiling in a case-control design to compare whole blood samples between normal subjects (n=20) and patients with (n=11) or without (n=22) biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR) or borderline changes (n=5).

RESULTS

A total of 183 probe sets representing 160 genes were differentially expressed (false discovery rate [FDR] <0.01) between subjects with or without BCAR, from which linear discriminant analysis and cross-validation identified an initial gene signature of 24 probe sets, and a more refined set of 11 probe sets found to classify subject samples correctly. Cross-validation suggested an out-of-sample sensitivity of 73% and specificity of 91% for identification of samples with or without BCAR. An increase in classifier gene expression correlated closely with acute rejection during the first 3 months posttransplant. Biological evaluation indicated that the differentially expressed genes encompassed processes related to immune response, signal transduction, and cytoskeletal reorganization.

CONCLUSION

Preliminary evidence indicates that gene expression in the peripheral blood may yield a relevant measure for the occurrence of BCAR and offer a potential tool for immunologic monitoring. These results now require confirmation in a larger cohort.

Scoring total inflammation is superior to the current Banff inflammation score in predicting outcome and the degree of molecular disturbance in renal allografts

Emerging molecular analysis can be used as an objective and independent assessment of histopathological scoring systems. We compared the existing Banff i-score to the total inflammation (total i-) score for assessing the molecular phenotype in 129 renal allograft biopsies for cause. The total i-score showed stronger correlations with microarray-based gene sets representing major biological processes during allograft rejection. Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that total-i was superior (areas under the curves 0.85 vs. 0.73 for Banff i-score, p = 0.012) at assessing an abnormal cytotoxic T-cell burden, because it identified molecular disturbances in biopsies with advanced scarring. The total-i score was also a better predictor of graft survival than the Banff i-score and essentially all current diagnostic Banff categories. The exception was antibody-mediated rejection which is able to predict graft loss with greater specificity (96%) but at low sensitivity (38%) due to the fact that it only applies to cases with this diagnosis. The total i-score is able to achieve moderate sensitivities (60-80%) with losses in specificity (60-80%) across the whole population. Thus, the total i-score is superior to the current Banff i-score and most diagnostic Banff categories in predicting outcome and assessing the molecular phenotype of renal allografts.

Enhanced granulysin mRNA expression in urinary sediment in early and delayed acute renal allograft rejection

BACKGROUND

Acute rejection (aRx) has a major impact on the long-term outcome of renal allografts, and its diagnosis is contingent on the invasive procedure of allograft biopsy. New immunosuppressive protocols have reduced the incidence but have not abolished this problem. Moreover, aRx is now more frequently seen several weeks after transplantation in outpatients. A noninvasive diagnostic test for predicting aRx could improve the management and outcome. The recently described measurement of urinary mRNA expression offers a new noninvasive approach.

METHODS

In this study, the authors monitored the urinary mRNA expression (221 specimens from 26 patients) of various immune molecules by real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for up to 3 months after kidney transplantation. Most of the patients received anti-interleukin (IL)-2 receptor monoclonal antibody induction and tacrolimus-based maintenance immunosuppression, which resulted in a low incidence of aRx. To verify the "rejection" markers, an additional nine samples of patients with aRx were analyzed.

RESULTS

Granulysin mRNA increase (vs. 95% confidence interval of 159 urine samples from nonrejecting patients) was detected during 11 of 14 aRx episodes, and follow-up studies showed its predictive value for delayed aRx episodes, even weeks before enhanced serum creatinine was observed. Granulysin induction was associated with enhanced regulated on activation normal T-cell expressed and secreted (RANTES) mRNA expression in 8 of 11 samples. Other cytotoxic effector molecules (granzyme B, perforin, FasL), cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-alpha, RANTES, IL-2, IL-10, interferon-gamma, transforming growth factor-beta), CD3, and CCR1 showed less specificity and sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors' data illustrate that the noninvasive kinetic mRNA expression measurement of defined markers in urinary cells of renal allograft recipients allows the early noninvasive detection of ongoing aRx.

Quantitative detection of T-cell activation markers by real-time PCR in renal transplant rejection and correlation with histopathologic evaluation

BACKGROUND

The quest for noninvasive methods to diagnose rejection in solid-organ transplants has been rejuvenated by recent observations that specific cytotoxic T-cell markers are up-regulated during rejection.

METHODS

We developed a one-step real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method allowing reliable detection of the expression of several T-cell genes within a relatively short period of time. The assay is highly sensitive and reproducible with a wide dynamic range allowing accurate quantification of target mRNA in as little as 3 pg total RNA. The utility of this assay in detecting renal allograft rejection was evaluated. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected from 27 patients undergoing kidney allograft biopsies for renal dysfunction after transplantation. Expression of the T-cell activation markers, granzyme B, perforin, and HLA-DRA, was quantified and correlated to the histopathologic changes in the renal biopsies.

RESULTS

In cases with allograft rejection (n=8), peripheral lymphocyte expression was increased for granzyme B (P <0.001) and perforin (P <0.08) compared with cases without rejection (n=19). Granzyme B mRNA up-regulation showed the highest specificity for detecting rejection (95%). Moreover, HLA-DRA mRNA was significantly up-regulated (P <0.0016) and had the highest sensitivity (88%) detecting rejection. The up-regulation of both granzyme B and HLA-DRA was most specific in detecting rejection, P<0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate that a rapid test of target gene up-regulation using real-time PCR can be used as an aid in the diagnosis of kidney allograft rejection. This is also the first report on the possible utility of HLA-DRA mRNA up-regulation as a marker for kidney transplant rejection.