Isothermic hemodialysis and ultrafiltration

Unveiling the Clinical Benefits of High-Volume Hemodiafiltration: Optimizing the Removal of Medium-Weight Uremic Toxins and Beyond

Dialysis treatment has improved the survival of patients with kidney failure. However, the hospitalization and mortality rates remain alarmingly high, primarily due to incomplete uremic toxin elimination. High-volume hemodiafiltration (HDF) has emerged as a promising approach that significantly improves patient outcomes by effectively eliminating medium and large uremic toxins, which explains its increasing adoption, particularly in Europe and Japan. Interest in this therapy has grown following the findings of the recently published CONVINCE study, as well as the need to understand the mechanisms behind the benefits. This comprehensive review aims to enhance the scientific understanding by explaining the underlying physiological mechanisms that contribute to the positive effects of HDF in terms of short-term benefits, like hemodynamic tolerance and cardiovascular disease. Additionally, it explores the rationale behind the medium-term clinical benefits, including phosphorus removal, the modulation of inflammation and oxidative stress, anemia management, immune response modulation, nutritional effects, the mitigation of bone disorders, neuropathy relief, and amyloidosis reduction. This review also analyzes the impact of HDF on patient-reported outcomes and mortality. Considering the importance of applying personalized uremic toxin removal strategies tailored to the unique needs of each patient, high-volume HDF appears to be the most effective treatment to date for patients with renal failure. This justifies the need to prioritize its application in clinical practice, initially focusing on the groups with the greatest potential benefits and subsequently extending its use to a larger number of patients.

An update review on hemodynamic instability in renal replacement therapy patients

BACKGROUND

Hemodynamic instability in patients undergoing kidney replacement therapy (KRT) is one of the most common and essential factors influencing mortality, morbidity, and the quality of life in this patient population.

METHOD

Decreased cardiac preload, reduced systemic vascular resistance, redistribution of fluids, fluid overload, inflammatory factors, and changes in plasma osmolality have all been implicated in the pathophysiology of hemodynamic instability associated with KRT.

RESULT

A cascade of these detrimental mechanisms may ultimately cause intra-dialytic hypotension, reduced tissue perfusion, and impaired kidney rehabilitation. Multiple parameters, including dialysate composition, temperature, posture during dialysis sessions, physical activity, fluid administrations, dialysis timing, and specific pharmacologic agents, have been studied as possible management modalities. Nevertheless, a clear consensus is not reached.

CONCLUSION

This review includes a thorough investigation of the literature on hemodynamic instability in KRT patients, providing insight on interventions that may potentially minimize factors leading to hemodynamic instability.

Intradialytic Hypotension: Mechanisms and Outcome

Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) occurs in approximately 10-12% of treatments. Whereas several definitions for IDH are available, a nadir systolic blood pressure carries the strongest relation with outcome. Whereas the relation between IDH may partly be based on patient characteristics, it is likely that also impaired organ perfusion leading to permanent damage, plays a role in this relationship. The pathogenesis of IDH is multifactorial and is based on a combination of a decline in blood volume (BV) and impaired vascular resistance at a background of a reduced cardiovascular reserve. Measurements of absolute BV based on an on-line dilution method appear more promising than relative BV measurements in the prediction of IDH. Also, feedback treatments in which ultrafiltration rate is automatically adjusted based on changes in relative BV have not yet resulted in improvement. Frequent assessment of dry weight, attempting to reduce interdialytic weight gain and prescribing more frequent or longer dialysis treatments may aid in preventing IDH. The impaired vascular response can be improved using isothermic or cool dialysis treatment which has also been associated with a reduction in end organ damage, although their effect on mortality has not yet been assessed. For the future, identification of vulnerable patients based on artificial intelligence and on-line assessment of markers of organ perfusion may aid in individualizing treatment prescription, which will always remain dependent on the clinical context of the patient.

Dialysate temperature reduction for intradialytic hypotension for people with chronic kidney disease requiring haemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is a common complication of haemodialysis (HD), and a risk factor of cardiovascular morbidity and death. Several clinical studies suggested that reduction of dialysate temperature, such as fixed reduction of dialysate temperature or isothermal dialysate using a biofeedback system, might improve the IDH rate.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to evaluate the benefits and harms of dialysate temperature reduction for IDH among patients with chronic kidney disease requiring HD, compared with standard dialysate temperature.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched Cochrane Kidney and Transplant's Specialised Register up to 14 May 2019 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cross-over RCTs, cluster RCTs and quasi-RCTs were included in the review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted information including participants, interventions, outcomes, methods of the study, and risks of bias. We used a random-effects model to perform quantitative synthesis of the evidence. We assessed the risks of bias for each study using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool. We assessed the certainty of evidence using Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 25 studies (712 participants). Three studies were parallel RCTs and the others were cross-over RCTs. Nineteen studies compared fixed reduction of dialysate temperature (below 36°C) and standard dialysate temperature (37°C to 37.5°C). Most studies were of unclear or high risk of bias. Compared with standard dialysate, it is uncertain whether fixed reduction of dialysate temperature improves IDH rate (8 studies, 153 participants: rate ratio 0.52, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.80; very low certainty evidence); however, it might increase the discomfort rate compared with standard dialysate (4 studies, 161 participants: rate ratio 8.31, 95% CI 1.86 to 37.12; very low certainty evidence). There were no reported dropouts due to adverse events. No study reported death, acute coronary syndrome or stroke.Three studies compared isothermal dialysate and thermoneutral dialysate. Isothermal dialysate might improve the IDH rate compared with thermoneutral dialysate (2 studies, 133 participants: rate ratio 0.68, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.76; I² = 0%; very low certainty evidence). There were no reports of discomfort rate (1 study) or dropouts due to adverse events (2 studies). No study reported death, acute coronary syndrome or stroke.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Reduction of dialysate temperature may prevent IDH, but the conclusion is uncertain. Larger studies that measure important outcomes for HD patients are required to assess the effect of reduction of dialysate temperature. Six ongoing studies may provide much-needed high quality evidence in the future.

Mathematical modeling of thermal and circulatory effects during hemodialysis

Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is one of the most common complications of hemodialysis (HD) treatment. The initiating factor of IDH is a decrease in blood volume, which is related to an imbalance between ultrafiltration (UF) and refilling rate. Impaired reactivity of resistance and capacitance vessels in reaction to hypovolemia plays possibly a major role in the occurrence of IDH. These vessels also fulfill an important function in body temperature regulation. UF-induced cutaneous vasoconstriction would result in a reduced surface heat loss and an increase in core temperature. To release body heat, skin blood flow is increased at a later stage of the HD treatment, whereby possibly IDH can occur. The aim of the study is to develop a mathematical model that can provide insight into the impact of thermoregulatory processes on the cardiovascular (CV) system during HD treatment. The mathematical procedure has been created by coupling a thermo-physiological model with a CV model to study regulation mechanisms in the human body during HD + UF. Model simulations for isothermal versus thermoneutral HD + UF were compared with measurement data of patients on chronic intermittent HD (n = 13). Core temperature during simulated HD + UF sessions increased within the range of measurement data (0.23°C vs. 0.32 ± 0.41°C). The model showed a decline in mean arterial pressure of -7% for thermoneutral HD + UF versus -4% for isothermal HD + UF after 200 min during which relative blood volume changed by -13%. In conclusion, simulation results of the combined model show possibilities for predicting circulatory and thermal responses during HD + UF.

Relation between trends in body temperature and outcome in incident hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Various biochemical and physiological variables are related to outcome in hemodialysis (HD) patients. However, the prognostic implications of trends in body temperature (BT) in this population have not yet been studied. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between trends in BT and outcome in incident HD patients.

METHODS

Six thousand seven hundred and forty-two incident HD patients without thyroid disease from the Renal Research Institute were followed for 1 year. Patients were divided into tertiles of initial pre-dialysis BT (Tertile 1: ≤ 36.47°C, Tertile 2: > 36.47 to 36.71°C and Tertile 3: > 36.7°C) and further classified according to the change in BT (increased: > 0.01°C/month, decreased: less than -0.01°C/month and stable, with change between - 0.01 and + 0.01°C/month) during the first year of treatment. The reference group is Tertile 2 of initial temperature with stable BT. Cox regression was used for survival analyses. Analyses were repeated for patients who survived the first year and were treated for ≥ 1 month in Year 2.

RESULTS

BT decreased in 2903 patients, remained stable in 2238 patients and increased in 1601 patients. After adjustment for multiple risk factors, hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality were higher for those groups in whom, irrespective of the initial BT, BT increased or declined, as compared to the reference group during follow-up (HR between 1.46 and 2.27).

CONCLUSIONS

The best survival was observed in the group with the highest BT at baseline and stable BT during the follow-up period (HR 0.50).

Simultaneous Blood Temperature Control and Blood Volume Control Reduces Intradialytic Symptoms

Purpose

Intra-dialytic morbid events (IME; e.g. hypotension, cramps, headaches) are frequent complications during hemodialysis (HD), known to be associated with ultrafiltration-induced hypovolemia and body temperature changes. Feedback control of blood volume adjusts the ultrafiltration rate in order to keep the blood volume above the patient's individual limit; feedback control of blood temperature maintains the mean arterial blood temperature at the individual pre-dialytic level. Each of these methods reduces the frequency of IME.

Methods

In a randomized clinical trial the simultaneous application of both feedback controls was investigated for the first time. In 15 weeks, each patient went through 3 study phases: an observational screening phase, a standard phase (STD), and a blood temperature- and blood volume-control phase (CTL). Patients with at least 5 sessions with IME out of 15 sessions in the screening phase were eligible for the study and randomized either into sequence STD-CTL or CTL-STD.

Results

26 patients completed the study according to protocol, and 778 HD treatments were analyzed. The general treatment parameters were similar in both study phases: treatment duration (STD: 244 min, CTL: 243 min, NS), pre-dialytic weight (STD: 72.3 kg, CTL: 72.2 kg, NS), and weight loss due to ultrafiltration (STD: 3.26 kg, CTL: 3.15 kg, NS). The proportion of HD treatments with IME was 32.8% during STD and 18.0% during CTL (p=0.024).

Conclusions

The frequency of HD sessions with IME was significantly reduced by 45% compared to standard HD in this randomized clinical trial by use of individualized HD treatments with simultaneous feedback control of blood volume and blood temperature.

Urea kinetics and intermittent dialysis prescription in small animals

Hemodialysis improves survival for animals with acute kidney injury beyond what would be expected with conventional management of the same animals. Clinical evidence and experience in human patients suggest a role for earlier intervention with renal replacement to avoid the morbidity of uremia and to promote better metabolic stability and recovery. For a large population of animal patients, it is the advanced standard for the management of acute and chronic uremia, life-threatening poisoning, and fluid overload for which there is no alternative therapy.

Review: membranes for haemodialysis

Haemodialysis, by design, uses a semipermeable membrane to separate blood from dialysate. The qualities of this membrane determine the nature of the 'traffic' between the blood and dialysate. In this sense, the qualities of the membrane determine what size molecules move from one compartment to the other, the amount and rate at which they might move and the amount and rate of water movement across the membrane. In addition, the nature of the membrane influences the biological response of the patient both in terms of what is or is not removed by the dialysis process and by way of the reaction to the biocompatibility of the membrane. This brief review will explore aspects of dialysis membrane characteristics.

A systematic review of the clinical effects of reducing dialysate fluid temperature

BACKGROUND

Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is a frequent complication of haemodialysis. Reducing the temperature of the dialysis fluid is a simple therapeutic strategy but is relatively underused. This may be due to concerns regarding its effects on symptoms and dialysis adequacy. We performed a systematic review of the literature to examine the effects of cool dialysis on intradialytic blood pressure, and to assess its safety in terms of thermal symptoms and small solute clearance.

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, databases of ongoing trials, the contents of four major renal journals as well as hand-searching reference lists. We included all prospective randomized studies that compared any technique of reducing dialysate temperature with standard bicarbonate dialysis. These techniques included an empirical, fixed reduction of dialysate temperature or use of a biofeedback temperature-control device (BTM) to deliver isothermic dialysis or programmed patient cooling.

RESULTS

A total of 22 studies comprising 408 patients were included (16 studies examined a fixed empirical temperature reduction and six examined BTM). All studies were of crossover design and relatively short duration. IDH occurred 7.1 (95% CI, 5.3-8.9) times less frequently with cool dialysis (both fixed reduction and BTM). Post-dialysis mean arterial pressure was higher with cool-temperature dialysis by 11.3 mmHg (95% CI, 7.7-15.0). No studies reported that cool dialysis led to a reduction in dialysis adequacy as assessed by urea clearance. The frequency and severity of thermal-related symptoms were generally reported inadequately.

CONCLUSIONS

Reducing the temperature of the dialysate is an effective intervention to reduce the frequency of IDH and does not adversely affect dialysis adequacy. This applies to the fixed reduction of dialysate temperature and BTM. It remains unclear as to what extent cool-temperature dialysis causes intolerable cold symptoms during dialysis. There are no trials comparing fixed empirical temperature reduction with BTM, and no trials examining the long-term effects of cool dialysis on patient outcomes.

Effect of donor age on the outcome of living-related kidney transplantation

The study compared the results of kidney transplantation from living-related donors older and younger than 60 years. The 273 kidney graft recipients were divided into group 1 (115 recipients of older grafts) and group 2 (158 recipients of younger grafts). The frequency of acute rejection (AR) episodes was similar in both groups but slow graft function occurred more frequently in group 1. The frequency of chronic renal allograft dysfunction in the first post-transplant year was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2. Patient and graft survival was significantly worse in group 1. Risk factors for graft loss were the difference between donor and recipient age and AR. Donor age and graft function were risk factors for patient death. Although kidneys from older donors provide a statistically poorer transplant outcome, they are clinically acceptable, especially when waiting time is prolonged and access to dialysis limited.

Assessment of dry weight by monitoring changes in blood volume during hemodialysis using Crit-Line

BACKGROUND

Routine assessment of dry weight in chronic hemodialysis patients relies primarily on clinical evaluation of patient fluid status. We evaluated whether measurement of postdialytic vascular refill could assist in the assessment of dry weight.

METHODS

Twenty-eight chronic, stable hemodialysis patients were studied during routine treatment sessions using constant dialysate temperature and dialysate sodium concentration, and relative changes in blood volume were monitored using Crit-Line III monitors throughout this study. The study was divided into three phases. Phase 1 studies evaluated the time-dependence of vascular compartment refill after completion of hemodialysis. Phase 2 studies evaluated the relationships in patient subgroups between intradialytic changes in blood volume and the presence of postdialytic vascular compartment refill during that last 10 minutes of hemodialysis after stopping ultrafiltration. Phase 3 studies evaluated the extent of dry weight changes following the application of a protocol for blood volume reduction, postdialytic vascular compartment refill, and correlation with clinical evidence of intradialytic hypovolemia and/or postdialytic fatigue. Phase 3 included anywhere from three to five treatments.

RESULTS

Phase 1 studies demonstrated that despite interpatient variability in the magnitude of postdialytic vascular compartment refill, when significant refill was evident, it always continued for at least 30 minutes. However, the majority of refill took place within 10 minutes postdialysis. Phase 2 studies identified 3 groups of patients: those who exhibited intradialytic reductions in blood volume but not postdialytic vascular compartment refill (group 1), those who exhibited intradialytic reductions in blood volume and postdialytic vascular compartment refill (group 2), and those whose blood volume did not change substantially during hemodialysis treatment (group 3). In phase 3 studies, use of an ultrafiltration protocol for blood volume reduction and monitoring of postdialytic vascular compartment refill combined with clinical assessment of hypovolemia and postdialytic fatigue demonstrated that patients often had a clinical dry weight assessment which was too low or too high. In all 28 patients studied, dry weight was either increased or decreased following use of this protocol.

CONCLUSION

Determination of the extent of both intradialytic decreases in blood volume and postdialytic vascular compartment refill, combined with clinical assessment of intradialytic hypovolemia and postdialytic fatigue, can help assess patient dry weight and optimize volume status while reducing dialysis associated morbidity. The number of hospital admissions due to fluid overload may be reduced.

Effect of Ultrafiltration on Thermal Variables, Skin Temperature, Skin Blood Flow, and Energy Expenditure during Ultrapure Hemodialysis

The cause of the increase in core temperature (CT) during hemodialysis (HD) is still under debate. It has been suggested that peripheral vasoconstriction as a result of hypovolemia, leading to a reduced dissipation of heat from the skin, is the main cause of this increase in CT. If so, then it would be expected that extracorporeal heat flow (Jex) needed to maintain a stable CT (isothermic; T-control = 0, no change in CT) is largely different between body temperature control HD combined with ultrafiltration (UF) and body temperature control HD without UF (isovolemic). Consequently, significant differences in DeltaCT would be expected between isovolemic HD and HD combined with UF at zero Jex (thermoneutral; E-control = 0, no supply or removal of thermal energy to and from the extracorporeal circulation). During the latter treatment, the CT is expected to increase. In this study, changes in thermal variables (CT and Jex), skin blood flow, energy expenditure, and cytokines (TNF-alpha, IL-1 receptor antagonist, and IL-6) were compared in 13 patients, each undergoing body temperature control (T-control = 0) HD without and with UF and energy-neutral (E-control = 0) HD without and with UF. CT increased equally during energy-neutral treatments, with (0.32 +/- 0.16 degrees C; P = 0.000) and without (0.27 +/- 0.29 degrees C; P = 0.006) UF. In body temperature control treatments, the relationship between Jex and UF tended to be significant (r = -0.51; P = 0.07); however, there was no significant difference in cooling requirements regardless of whether treatments were done without (-17.9 +/- 9.3W) or with UF (-17.8 +/- 13.27W). Changes in energy expenditure did not differ among the four treatment modes. There were no significant differences in pre- and postdialysis levels of cytokines within or between treatments. Although fluid removal has an effect on thermal variables, no single mechanism seems to be responsible for the increased heat accumulation during HD.

Predilution hemodiafiltration displays no hemodynamic advantage over low-flux hemodialysis under matched conditions

BACKGROUND

It is the prevailing view that convective dialysis techniques stabilize blood pressure. The aim of this study was to compare the intrasession hemodynamics during high-dose predilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) and low-flux hemodialsis, under strict controlled conditions.

METHODS

Twelve stable hemodialysis patients were investigated in a randomized crossover blinded controlled trial. The patients were allocated to one session of predilution HDF (substitution fluid 1.20 +/- 0.10 L/kg body weight) and one session of hemodialysis at 4(1/2) hours. To eliminate confounding factors, dialysis dose, ultrafiltration volume and arterial temperature were matched. At the start of the dialysis the patients' core temperature was "locked" by an automatic feedback system regulating the dialysate temperature; thereby, patients' temperature was kept stable throughout the whole treatment. The calcium-ion concentration in the substitution/dialysis fluid was 1.25 mmol/L. Cardiac output was measured hourly by the ultrasound velocity dilution method.

RESULTS

Mean blood pressure, cardiac output, stroke volume, cardiac work, and relative blood volume was significantly reduced in both treatments. Total peripheral resistance increased significantly in both groups. Ultrafiltration volume, cardiopulmonary recirculation, Kt/V, and total energy transfer were similar for hemodialysis and HDF. The pulse rate showed no significant change throughout both sessions. No significant differences were revealed between hemodialysis and HDF.

CONCLUSION

The hemodynamics of predilution HDF and low-flux hemodialysis displayed a similar profile during matched conditions. An acute circulatory benefit of convective solute removal over diffusive could not be demonstrated.

Body temperature regulation during hemodialysis in long-term patients: is it time to change dialysate temperature prescription?

During hemodialysis procedures, changes in the dialysate temperature can raise or lower body temperature because the blood is returned to the patient in thermal equilibrium with the dialysate. Even a dialysate temperature equal to the patient's body temperature as measured from the tympanic membrane, oral cavity, or axilla can result in an increase in the patient's body temperature, leading to cutaneous vasodilation and the potential for cardiovascular instability and hypotension. This deleterious cycle of events can be prevented by suitably adjusting the dialysate temperature. Lowering the dialysate temperature from 37 degrees C to 34-35.5 degrees C has improved the cardiovascular stability of many hemodialysis patients. Continuous monitoring of blood temperature allows the practitioner to make preemptive changes in dialysate temperature because a small change in body temperature can have enormous cardiovascular implications. For example, only 0.3 degrees C to 0.8 degrees C separates the thresholds for skin vasodilation from that for shivering. A suggested improvement in the hemodialysis procedure is to use devices that allow continuous monitoring of arterial and venous blood temperatures and adjust the dialysate temperature automatically, keeping the patient, not the dialysate, isothermic. Less optimal solutions appear to be (1) to monitor arterial and venous temperatures while manually adjusting the dialysate temperature to maintain arterial (and hence body) temperature stability; (2) to monitor peripheral temperatures (oral, tympanic) at regular intervals and adjust dialysate temperature to maintain the body temperature constant; (3) routinely use a dialysate temperature <37.0 degrees C in all patients unless contraindicated.

Hemodialysis-Induced Hypotension: Impact of Technologic Advances

Hemodialysis-induced hypotension is one of the most serious complications in renal replacement therapy. The main cause of intradialytic hypotension is hypovolemia due to an imbalance between the amount of fluid removed and the refilling capacity of the intravascular compartment. Hypotension occurs when compensatory mechanisms for hypovolemia are overwhelmed by excessive fluid removal. As long as renal replacement therapy is limited to only a few hours per week, intradialytic hypotension will continue to be a relevant problem. Research has mainly focused on enlarging the compensatory capacity for ultrafiltration-induced hypovolemia. This article critically discusses the technical approaches that have been introduced into therapy in recent years with the promise of reducing dialysis-induced hypotensive episodes.

RENAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE SYMPOSIUM: Temperature Control by the Blood Temperature Monitor

The rationale of temperature control during hemodialysis (HD) is to prevent heat accumulation, which increases body temperature and enhances hypotensive susceptibility. Treatments where thermal energy is neither delivered nor removed from the patient through the extracorporeal circulation (so-called extracorporeal thermoneutral treatments) lead to a marked increase in body temperature and to considerable heat accumulation during HD. Since this accumulation of heat cannot be explained by increased heat production, it must be related to reduced heat dissipation through the body surface. Peripheral vasoconstriction, and cutaneous vasoconstriction in particular, compensating for the ultrafiltration-induced decrease in blood volume is considered an important component in this setting. Therefore, to maintain temperature homeostasis, thermal energy has to be cleared from the patient by the extracorporeal system because cutaneous clearance of thermal energy is compromised intradialytically. The focus on dialysate temperature alone does not properly address the problem of controlled extracorporeal heat removal because dialysate temperature is only one of the variables involved in that process. These difficulties can be addressed by changing from the control of dialysate temperature to control of body temperature. Control of body temperature and temperature homeostasis is achievable by the physiologic feedback control system realized in the temperature control mode (T-mode) of the blood temperature monitor (BTM). The delivery of isothermic dialysis, that is, dialysis where body temperature is controlled to remain constant during the treatment, has impressively improved hemodynamic stability in hypotension prone patients.

Heat accumulation with relative blood volume decrease

BACKGROUND

Both hypovolemia and heat accumulation act as powerful perturbations of blood pressure control. In hemodialysis, hypovolemia and heat accumulation often develop simultaneously, and the question arises of whether and to what extent these perturbations are linked.

METHODS

Heat accumulation was measured by the amount of thermal energy (E) removed from a patient during prescribed ultrafiltration under isothermic hemodialysis conditions, ie, constant patient temperature. Measurement and control of temperatures and thermal energies were performed using the blood temperature monitor. Relative blood volume (RBV) was measured using the blood volume monitor.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight treatments were analyzed in 12 patients (3 women). During treatments lasting 189 +/- 28 minutes, 5.1% +/- 1.3% of postdialysis body weight were removed from patients by ultrafiltration at a mean rate of 1.1 +/- 0.3 L/h. Blood volumes decreased to 85% +/- 7% of initial values, and 229 +/- 106 kJ of E were removed from patients at a cooling rate (J) of 20 +/- 8 W, corresponding to 28% +/- 11% of estimated energy expenditure (H%). E, J, and H% significantly increased as RBV decreased (P < 0.05). Linear regression analysis between J and RBV showed that approximately 1 W had to be removed from the patient for each percentage of change in blood volume (J = -102.38 + 0.97* RBV; r2 = 0.63).

CONCLUSION

Results show that the probability for the effect of heat stress during hemodialysis increases with ultrafiltration-induced blood volume changes. Temperature control is an important aspect of hemodialysis treatment.

The effects of control of thermal balance on vascular stability in hemodialysis patients: results of the European randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Many reports note that the use of cool dialysate has a protective effect on blood pressure during hemodialysis (HD) treatments. However, formal clinical trials in which dialysate temperature is tailored to the body temperature of appropriately selected hypotension-prone patients are lacking.

METHODS

We investigated the effect of thermal control of dialysate on hemodynamic stability in hypotension-prone patients selected from 27 centers in nine European countries. Patients were eligible for the study if they had symptomatic hypotensive episodes in 25% or more of their HD sessions, assessed during a prospective screening phase over 1 month. The study is designed as a randomized crossover trial with two phases and two treatment arms, each phase lasting 4 weeks. We used a device allowing the regulation of thermal balance (Blood Temperature Monitor; Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homberg, Germany), by which we compared a procedure aimed at preventing any transfer of thermal energy between dialysate and extracorporeal blood (thermoneutral dialysis) with a procedure aimed at keeping body temperature unchanged (isothermic dialysis).

RESULTS

One hundred sixteen HD patients were enrolled, and 95 patients completed the study. During thermoneutral dialysis (energy flow rate: DeltaE = -0.22 +/- 0.29 kJ/kg x h), 6 of 12 treatments (median) were complicated by hypotension, whereas during isothermic dialysis (energy flow rate: DeltaE = -0.90 +/- 0.35 kJ/kg x h), the median decreased to 3 of 12 treatments (P < 0.001). Systolic and diastolic blood pressures and heart rate were more stable during the latter procedure. Isothermic dialysis was well tolerated by patients.

CONCLUSION

Results show that active control of body temperature can significantly improve intradialytic tolerance in hypotension-prone patients.

Intradialytic hypotension: an overview of recent, unresolved and overlooked issues

The etiology and management of intradialytic hypotension has become an increasingly complex issue. Volume depletion due to ultrafiltration remains the predominant underlying etiologic factor. However, patients vary markedly in their hemodynamic tolerance to fluid removal. While many risk factors have been identified, the issues of sodium and thermal balance and variability in left ventricular filling have not been adequately emphasized or investigated.

Isothermic dialysis for hypotension-prone patients

Standard hemodialysis (dialysate temperature >or=37 degrees C) induces an increase in body temperature capable of eliciting circulatory adjustments dictated by the maintenance of thermal homeostasis. These adjustments oppose, and can overcome, those elicited by the hypovolemia caused by the ultrafiltration process, and thus predispose patients to develop hypotensive crises during the treatment. Hemodynamic studies in hypotension-prone patients treated with standard hemodialysis showed that during the hypotensive crisis the peripheral vascular resistances decrease, while the stroke volume decreases proportionally more than the blood volume, suggesting cardiac underfilling due to blood volume redistribution. On the other hand, removal of the body heat surplus by cool dialysis helped the same patients to sustain their peripheral vasoconstriction and cardiac filling. To prevent the increase in body temperature, dialysate temperature should be regulated in such a way as to remove through the dialyzer the heat surplus accumulated in the body as a result of the ultrafiltration process. The amount of heat removal should be tailored to each patient because there are wide interindividual and intraindividual variations in baseline body temperature and ultrafiltration requirements. This can be accomplished by the use of a device that can adjust the dialysate temperature automatically in order to keep the body temperature of the patient unchanged (isothermic hemodialysis). Isothermic hemodialysis reduced from 50% to 25% the incidence of treatments complicated by episodes of symptomatic hypotension in a large randomized clinical trial involving 95 high-risk patients. The thermoregulated treatment results in better patient tolerance because the cold stress inherent in this procedure is lower than that inflicted by the use of a fixed low temperature as was done in the past. Overall, the available evidence supports the Gotch hypothesis that the increase in body temperature during hemodialysis is due to the ultrafiltration process eliciting peripheral vasoconstriction and heat accumulation in the body. Heat accumulation brings into play the thermal homeostatic mechanisms endangering cardiovascular tolerance to ultrafiltration.

Modifying the dialysis prescription to reduce intradialytic hypotension

The dialysis prescription can have a substantial impact on the frequency of intradialytic hypotension (IDH). Plasma volume will decline to a greater extent when the ultrafiltration (UF) rate is rapid (high interdialytic weight gains and/or short treatment time), favoring IDH. The relationship of the target weight to the euvolemic weight determines the size of the interstitial fluid compartment, which is a major determinant of the rate of plasma refilling during UF. The higher the dialysate sodium, the smaller the decline in plasma volume for any given amount of UF. Use of a dialysate temperature that prevents a positive thermal balance during dialysis will allow peripheral vascular resistance to be maintained and minimize IDH. A higher ionized calcium during treatment facilitates an increase in cardiac output, a benefit that may be particularly notable in patients with depressed cardiac ejection fraction. Low dialysate magnesium, potassium, and bicarbonate may all favor IDH, although insufficient data are available for definitive conclusions. The choice of antihypertensive medication and the treatment schedule must be carefully considered in patients with IDH. The future integration of technology to monitor blood pressure, plasma volume, and thermal and sodium balance into a computer-based biofeedback system will very likely go a long way toward reducing the frequency of IDH.

Temperature and thermal balance in hemodialysis

The analysis of thermal balance and temperature in hemodialysis patients reveals both striking similarities and important differences to urea kinetics. Both urea and thermal energy need to be removed during hemodialysis, however, for different reasons. Urea accumulates between hemodialysis treatments, whereas thermal energy accumulates within hemodialysis treatments. Urea concentration is ideally reduced by approximately 70% during a treatment, whereas temperature is ideally kept constant by removing up to 50% of resting energy expenditure because heat dissipation from the body surface is obstructed as a result of ultrafiltration-induced hypovolemia. Extracorporeal heat removal is controlled by several factors. Dialysate and patient temperatures play the main role. Low body temperatures are not uncommon with hemodialysis patients, so that dialysate temperatures less than 36 degrees C are often required to maintain reasonable temperature gradients. Another important role is played by extracorporeal blood flow. At the same temperature gradient, heat transfer by extracorporeal blood flow used with high-efficiency dialysis is approximately six times more efficient than the dissipation of heat across the body surface. And, last but not least, the venous section of the extracorporeal circulation provides constant cooling of approximately 10 W. Almost all dialysis treatments provide extracorporeal cooling, even those using dialysate at 37 degrees C. Therefore it is probably better to define the thermal aspects of hemodialysis with regard to the physiologic effects on the patient. Since thermoregulation responds to changes in body temperature, treatments should be characterized as isothermic, hypothermic, and hyperthermic.

Thermal effects and blood pressure response during postdilution hemodiafiltration and hemodialysis: the effect of amount of replacement fluid and dialysate temperature

It has been suggested that the incidence of hypotensive episodes is less with hemodiafiltration (HDF) than with hemodialysis (HD). The aim of the present study was to assess the BP response during HD and postdilution HDF in relation to the thermal effects of these different treatment modalities by manipulating the dialysate temperature (Td) during HD and the amount of replacement fluid during HDF. In 12 patients, energy transfer rate (in watts) and maximal decline in mean arterial pressure during HD at Td 37.5 degrees C, HD at Td 35.5 degrees C, and postdilution HDF with amounts of replacement fluids infused at room temperature of 1 L/h and 2.5 L/h, respectively, were assessed. All measurements were done twice in each patient. Energy transfer rate was comparable between HD 35.5 degrees C (-26.61 +/- 5.33) and HDF 2.5 L/h (-25.25 +/- 7.91) and was significantly more negative compared with HD 37.5 degrees C (-3.53 +/- 6.44) and HDF 1 L/h (-15.88 +/- 6.94). The maximum decline in mean arterial pressure was significantly higher during HD 37.5 degrees C (-25.6 +/- 13.5) than during HD 35.5 degrees C (-15.1 +/- 13.8) and HDF 2.5 L/h (-19.2 +/- 17.7), whereas there was no significant difference with HDF 1 L/h (-23.0 +/- 14.0). In conclusion, thermal effects during postdilution HDF are dependent on the amount of replacement fluid. Also during HDF, the BP response is strongly related to thermal effects. The use of postdilution HDF with low or intermediate amounts of replacement fluids infused at room temperature seems to have no advantage in preventing hemodynamic instability, compared with HD 35.5 degrees C.

Malignancy and renal disease

A variety of renal diseases and electrolyte disorders may be associated with various malignancies or with treatment of malignancy with chemotherapeutic drugs or radiation. This article reviews renal disease in cancer patients, which constitutes a major source of morbidity and mortality.