Modulation of graft-versus-tumor effects in a murine allogeneic bone marrow transplantation model by tumor-derived transforming growth factor-betaI

Graft-versus-cancereffect and innovative approaches in thetreatment of refractory solid tumors

Background/aim

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) has been used for the treatment of various refractory solid tumors during the last two decades. After the demonstration of graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) effect in a leukemic murine model following allo-HSCT from other strains of mice, graft-versus-tumor (GvT) effect in a solid tumor after allo-HSCT has also been reported in a murine model in 1984. Several trials have reported the presence of a GvT effect in patients with various refractory solid tumors, including renal, ovarian and colon cancers, as well as soft tissue sarcomas [1]. The growing data on haploidentical transplants also indicate GvT effect in some pediatric refractory solid tumors. Novel immunotherapy-based treatment modalities aim at inducing an allo-reactivity against the metastatic solid tumor via a GvT effect. Recipient derived immune effector cells (RDICs) in the antitumor reactivity following allo-HSCT have also been considered as an emerging therapy for advanced refractory solid tumors.

Conclusion

This review summarizes the background, rationale, and clinical results of immune-based strategies using GvT effect for the treatment of various metastatic and refractory solid tumors, as well as innovative approaches such as haploidentical HSCT, CAR-T cell therapies and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL).

Bioprofiling TS/A Murine Mammary Cancer for a Functional Precision Experimental Model

The TS/A cell line was established in 1983 from a spontaneous mammary tumor arisen in an inbred BALB/c female mouse. Its features (heterogeneity, low immunogenicity and metastatic ability) rendered the TS/A cell line suitable as a preclinical model for studies on tumor-host interactions and for gene therapy approaches. The integrated biological profile of TS/A resulting from the review of the literature could be a path towards the description of a precision experimental model of mammary cancer.

Th2 cell therapy of established acute graft-versus-host disease requires IL-4 and IL-10 and is abrogated by IL-2 or host-type antigen-presenting cells

Delayed donor Th2 cell infusion permits a graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effect to occur with subsequent amelioration of established graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Relative to GVHD controls (B6-into-BALB/c model), recipients of delayed Th2 cells (day 14 post-BMT) had increased survival (3/3 experiments [exp]; each exp P < .0001) and reduced GVHD by histology analysis 5 days post-Th2 infusion without increased tumor burden (3 of 3 exp; each exp P < or = .02). Th2 cell-mediated amelioration of GVHD was associated with greatly reduced allospecific IFN-gamma secretion, in vivo augmentation of allospecific IL-4 and IL-10 secretion, and reduction in donor CD8(+) T cell number post-BMT (3 of 3 exp; each comparison, P < or = .003). To better understand the molecular mechanism of this GVHD therapy, Th2 cells were generated from wild-type (WT), IL-4 deficient (KO), or IL-10 KO donors: remarkably, recipients of IL-4 or IL-10 KO Th2 cells had no survival advantage, no improvement in GVHD by histology, no reduction in CD8(+) T cell expansion post-BMT, and no in vivo shift toward type II cytokines. We reasoned that IL-2 and alloantigen availability may be limiting factors for Th2 cell therapy, and as such, evaluated whether coadministration of IL-2 or coinfusion of host-type antigen-presenting cells (APC) might intensify the anti-GVHD effect. However, contrary to these hypotheses, concomitant IL-2 therapy or APC administration fully abrogated the Th2 cell-mediated survival advantage and histology-defined GVHD reduction, reduced Th2 cell expansion in vivo while promoting CD8(+) T cell expansion from cells originating from the initial allograft, and impaired type II polarization in vivo. In conclusion, Th2 cell therapy can rapidly ameliorate severe GVHD via IL-4 and IL-10 mediated mechanisms, and potentially, via IL-2 consumption and APC modulation mechanisms.

Ex vivo rapamycin generates Th1/Tc1 or Th2/Tc2 Effector T cells with enhanced in vivo function and differential sensitivity to post-transplant rapamycin therapy

Rapamycin prevention of murine graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is associated with a shift toward Th2- and Tc2-type cytokines. Recently, we found that use of rapamycin during ex vivo donor Th2 cell generation enhances the ability of adoptively transferred Th2 cells to prevent murine GVHD. In this study, using a method, without antigen-presenting cells, of T-cell expansion based on CD3,CD28 costimulation, we evaluated whether (1) rapamycin preferentially promotes the generation of Th2/Tc2 cells relative to Th1/Tc1 cells, (2) rapamycin-generated T-cell subsets induce cytokine skewing after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT), and (3) such in vivo cytokine skewing is sensitive to post-BMT rapamycin therapy. Contrary to our hypothesis, rapamycin did not preferentially promote Th2/Tc2 cell polarity, because rapamycin-generated Th1/Tc1 cells secreted type I cytokines (interleukin [IL]-2 and interferon-gamma) did not secrete type II cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, or IL-13) and mediated fasL-based cytolysis. Rapamycin influenced T-cell differentiation, because each of the Th1, Th2, Tc1, and Tc2 subsets generated in rapamycin had increased expression of the central-memory T-cell marker, L-selectin (CD62L). Rapamycin-generated Th1/Tc1 and Th2/Tc2 cells were not anergic but instead had increased expansion after costimulation in vitro, increased expansion in vivo after BMT, and maintained full capacity to skew toward type I or II cytokines after BMT, respectively; further, rapamycin-generated Th1/Tc1 cells mediated increased lethal GVHD relative to control Th1/Tc1 cells. Rapamycin therapy after BMT in recipients of rapamycin-generated Th1/Tc1 cells greatly reduced Th1/Tc1 cell number, greatly reduced type I cytokines, and reduced lethal GVHD; in marked contrast, rapamycin therapy in recipients of rapamycin-generated Th2/Tc2 cells nominally influenced the number of Th2/Tc2 cells in vivo and did not abrogate post-BMT type II cytokine skewing. In conclusion, ex vivo and in vivo usage of rapamycin may be used to modulate the post-BMT balance of Th1/Tc1 and Th2/Tc2 cell subsets.

Ex vivo rapamycin generates donor Th2 cells that potently inhibit graft-versus-host disease and graft-versus-tumor effects via an IL-4-dependent mechanism

Rapamycin (sirolimus) inhibits graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) and polarizes T cells toward Th2 cytokine secretion after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Therefore, we reasoned that ex vivo rapamycin might enhance the generation of donor Th2 cells capable of preventing GVHD after fully MHC-disparate murine BMT. Using anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 costimulation, CD4+ Th2 cell expansion was preserved partially in high-dose rapamycin (10 microM; Th2.rapa cells). Th2.rapa cells secreted IL-4 yet had reduced IL-5, IL-10, and IL-13 secretion relative to control Th2 cells. BMT cohorts receiving wild-type (WT) Th2.rapa cells, but not Th2.rapa cells generated from IL-4-deficient (knockout) donors, had marked Th2 skewing post-BMT and greatly reduced donor anti-host T cell alloreactivity. Histologic studies demonstrated that Th2.rapa cell recipients had near complete abrogation of skin, liver, and gut GVHD. Overall survival in recipients of WT Th2.rapa cells, but not IL-4 knockout Th2.rapa cells, was constrained due to marked attenuation of an allogeneic graft-vs-tumor (GVT) effect against host-type breast cancer cells. Delay in Th2.rapa cell administration until day 4, 7, or 14 post-BMT enhanced GVT effects, moderated GVHD, and improved overall survival. Therefore, ex vivo rapamycin generates enhanced donor Th2 cells for attempts to balance GVHD and GVT effects.

Allogeneic lymphocytes induce tumor regression of advanced metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

Allogeneic T lymphocytes can induce regression of metastatic breast cancer through an immune-mediated graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effect in murine models. To determine if a clinical GVT effect exists against metastatic breast cancer, allogeneic lymphocytes were used as adoptive cellular therapy after a reduced-intensity chemotherapy conditioning regimen and allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) from human leukocyte antigen-matched siblings.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixteen patients with metastatic breast cancer that had progressed after treatment with anthracyclines, taxanes, hormonal agents, and trastuzumab, received allogeneic HSCT. The reduced-intensity transplant conditioning regimen consisted of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine. To distinguish an immunological GVT effect from any antitumor effect of cytotoxic chemotherapy in the transplant-conditioning regimen, allogeneic T lymphocytes were removed from the stem-cell graft and were subsequently administered late postallogeneic HSCT. Allogeneic lymphocytes containing 1 x 10(6), 5 x 10(6), and 10 x 10(6) CD3(+) cells/kg were infused on days +42, +70, and +98 post-allogeneic HSCT, respectively.

RESULTS

Objective tumor regressions occurred after day +28 post-allogeneic HSCT in six patients and were attributed to allogeneic lymphocyte infusions. Two of these responding patients had disease progression post-allogeneic HSCT before subsequent tumor regression. Tumor regressions occurred concomitantly with the establishment of complete donor T-lymphoid engraftment, were associated with the development of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and were abrogated by subsequent systemic immunosuppression for GVHD.

CONCLUSION

Allogeneic lymphocytes can induce regression of advanced metastatic breast cancer. These results indicate that an immunological GVT effect from allogeneic lymphocytes exists against metastatic breast cancer and provide rationale for further development of allogeneic cellular therapy for this largely incurable disease.

CD3/CD28-costimulated T1 and T2 subsets: differential in vivo allosensitization generates distinct GVT and GVHD effects

Adoptive T-cell therapy using CD3/CD28 co-stimulation likely requires in vivo generation of antigen specificity. Because CD28 promotes TH1/TC1 (T1) or TH2/TC2 (T2) differentiation, costimulation may generate donor T1 or T2 cells capable of differentially mediating allogeneic graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effects and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Costimulation under T1 or T2 conditions indeed generated murine TH1/TC1 cells secreting interleukin-2/interferon-gamma (IL-2/IFN-gamma) or TH2/TC2 cells secreting IL-4/IL-5/IL-10. In vivo, allogeneic T1 cells expanded, maintained T1 secretion, and acquired allospecificity involving IFN-gamma and IL-5. In contrast, allogeneic T2 cells expanded less and maintained T2 secretion but did not develop significant allospecificity.Allogeneic, but not syngeneic, T1 cells mediated a GVT effect against host-type breast cancer cells, as median survival time (MST) increased from 25.6 +/- 2.6 (tumor controls) to 69.2 +/- 5.9 days (P < 1.2 x 10(-9)). This T1-associated GVT effect operated independently of fasL because T1 cells from gld mice mediated tumor-free survival. In contrast, allogeneic T2 cells mediated a modest, noncurative GVT effect (MST, 29 +/- 1.3 days; P <.0019). T1 recipients had moderate GVHD (histologic score, 4 of 12) that contributed to lethality after bone marrow transplantation; in contrast, T2 recipients had minimal GVHD (histologic score, 1 of 12). CD3/CD28 co-stimulation, therefore, generates T1 or T2 populations with differential in vivo capacity for expansion to alloantigen, resulting in differential GVT effects and GVHD.

Nonmyeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for metastatic breast cancer

Previously, there was very little interest in investigating allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) in breast cancer because of the significant morbidity and mortality associated with this procedure, as well as the disappointing results observed in clinical trials with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in advanced breast cancer. However, the development of nonmyeloablative (reduced-intensity) conditioning regimens, which have less treatment-related mortality but preserve the T cell-mediated graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effect, has led to the investigation of nonmyeloablative alloHSCT in diseases that had not previously been considered for conventional alloHSCT, including metastatic breast cancer. Laboratory data demonstrate that T cell-mediated responses to breast cancer that inhibit tumor growth are possible and provide the rationale to pursue allogeneic adoptive cellular therapy as a strategy to eliminate breast cancer. Early reports of nonmyeloablative alloHSCT indicate that a clinical GVT effect against breast cancer does exist. The responses appear to be dependent on the development of complete donor lymphoid chimerism, and responses may be delayed. The results from these initial trials must be interpreted cautiously. It is unlikely that nonmyeloablative alloHSCT by itself will result in complete eradication of metastatic breast cancer; however, it may serve as a therapeutic platform to enhance the effects of currently available immunotherapies (eg, trastuzumab administration) and complement existing cytotoxic therapies. Well-designed studies will be necessary to determine the clinical efficacy of nonmyeloablative alloHSCT as adoptive cellular therapy in metastatic breast cancer.

Gene targets of antisense therapies in breast cancer

Advances in molecular and cell biology have led to further understanding of the mechanisms of malignant growth and metastasis in human breast cancer cells. Initiation and progression of breast cancer results from mutations and the abnormal expression of many genes that control cellular proliferation, differentiation, invasion, metastasis and sensitivity to therapy (chemotherapy and radiation therapy). Inhibition of host immunity also plays a role in breast cancer progression. Many genes have been selected as targets for antisense therapy, including HER-2/neu, PKA, TGF-alpha, EGFR, TGF-beta, IGFIR, P12, MDM2, BRCA, Bcl-2, ER, VEGF, MDR, ferritin, transferrin receptor, IRE, C-fos, HSP27, C-myc, C-raf and metallothionein genes. The strategy behind antisense therapy is the development of specific therapeutic agents that aim to correct the mutations and abnormal expression of cellular genes in breast tumour cells by decreasing gene expression, inducing degradation of target mRNA and causing premature termination of transcription. Many in vitro and in vivo studies have investigated the therapeutic efficacy of oligonucleotides and antisense RNAs. These studies have demonstrated specific inhibition of tumour cell growth by antisense therapy and have shown synergistic inhibitory effects between antisense oligonucleotides or antisense RNA and conventional chemotherapeutic drugs used in the treatment of breast cancer. Antisense oligonucleotides have been modified to improve their ability to penetrate cells, bind to gene sequences and downregulate target gene function. Many delivery systems for antisense RNA and antisense oligonucleotides have been developed, including virus vectors (retrovirus, adenovirus and adeno-associate virus) and liposomes, to carry the antisense RNA or oligonucleotides through the cell membrane into the cytoplasm and nucleus of the tumour cells. However, in order to determine their feasibility antisense therapies need to be further investigated to determine their antitumour activity, pharmacokinetics and toxicity in breast cancer patients.