Metastasectomy for liver metastases of non-colorectal primaries

Liver resection for noncolorectal and nonneuroendocrine metastases: Results of a study on 56 patients at a single institution

The usefulness of surgical treatment for hepatic metastases of noncolorectal non-neuroendocrine (NCRNNE) tumors is not yet clear due to the natural history of these tumors, their frequent systemic dissemination and their histological heterogeneity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of patients who underwent liver resection for NCRNNE metastases. For this purpose we retrospectively analyzed 202 patients who underwent liver resection for metastasis between January 1989 and December 2006 at the Department of Surgery of the University Hospital of Udine. Fifty-six patients underwent liver resection because of NCRNNE metastases. The preoperative assessment was based on hepatic ultrasonography and CT scan; PET was used in a few patients. All patients had intraoperative liver ultrasonography to evaluate the lesions and to define the resection. Gender, age, primary tumor site (gastrointestinal or nongastrointestinal), synchronous or metachronous metastasis, unilobar or bilobar localization, number and diameter of the lesion(s), type of resection, margin status, positive lymph nodes in the hepatoduodenal ligament, and time between surgery and diagnosis of liver metastases were evaluated as possible prognostic factors for survival. Univariate analysis showed that the location of the primary tumor and the disease-free interval since the treatment of the primary tumor were positive predictive factors for longer survival. Multivariate analysis showed that the only independent significant factor was gastrointestinal versus nongastrointestinal origin. Demographic data, the synchronous or metachronous appearance of metastases, their unilobar or bilobar location, number and size, the type of resection, the resection margin status and the involvement of lymph nodes did not prove to be prognostic factors.

Liver resection for non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine metastases

OBJECTIVE

Liver resections for non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine liver metastases (NCNELM) are gaining popularity. This study examines the outcomes of liver resections in patients with NCNELM in an Australian hospital.

METHOD

A database search identified 21 attempted liver resections on 20 patients (12 men, eight women, mean age: 63.1) from 1998 to 2013. A retrospective analysis considered patient demographics and primary malignancy details. Complication rates were compared to those for colorectal metastases at the same institution. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to plot overall survival.

RESULTS

Complete resection was achieved in 16 of the 21 operations with 13 cases having proven metastases (three cases were benign lesions on final histology). Primary cancers were gastric (n = 4), gall bladder/bile duct (n = 3), renal (n = 3), soft tissue sarcoma (n = 3), melanoma (n = 2), pancreatic (n = 2), anal (n = 2), breast (n = 1) and unknown (n = 1). Primary histology types were adenocarcinoma (n = 10), sarcoma (n = 3), renal cell (n = 3), squamous cell (n = 2), melanoma (n = 2) and gastrointestinal stromal tumour (n = 1). There was no peri-operative mortality. Significant post-operative complications (Clavien-Dindo Grade III or more) occurred in six patients (28.5%). Overall survival at 2 and 5 years was 46.2% and 30.8%, respectively, for all 21 cases of attempted resection, and 51.9% and 34.6%, respectively, for the 13 cases of complete resection of malignant metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

This study produced comparable 5-year survival rates to those reported after liver resection for colorectal metastases and in other studies on NCNELM. Complication rates were comparable to those for colorectal liver metastasis resection at the same institution.

Liver Resection for Non-Colorectal Liver Metastases - Standards and Extended Indications

Background

Due to the uncertain benefit of liver resection for non-colorectal liver metastases (NCLM), patient selection for surgery is generally difficult. Therefore, the aim of this article was to propose standard and extended indications for liver resection in this heterogeneous disease collective.

Methods

Review of the literature.

Results

The myriad of biologically different primary tumor entities as well as the mostly small and retrospective studies investigating the benefit of surgery for NCLM limits the proposal of general recommendations. Only resection of neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM) appears to offer a clear benefit with a 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) of 74 and 51%, respectively, in the largest series. Resection of liver metastases from genitourinary primaries might offer reasonable benefit in selected cases – with a 5-year OS of up to 61% for breast cancer and of 38% for renal cell cancer. The long-term outcome following surgery for other entities was remarkably poorer, e.g., gastric cancer, pancreatic cancer, and melanoma reached a 5-year OS of 20-42, 17-25, and about 20%, respectively.

Conclusion

Liver resection for NELM can be defined as a standard indication for the resection of NCLM while lesions of genitourinary origin might be defined as an extended indication.

Effects of Yttrium-90 selective internal radiation therapy on non-conventional liver tumors

The liver is a common site of metastasis, with essentially all metastatic malignancies having been known to spread to the liver. Nearly half of all patients with extrahepatic primary cancer have hepatic metastases. The severe prognostic implications of hepatic metastases have made surgical resection an important first line treatment in management. However, limitations such as the presence of extrahepatic spread or poor functional hepatic reserve exclude the majority of patients as surgical candidates, leaving chemotherapy and locoregional therapies as next best options. Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) is a form of catheter-based locoregional cancer treatment modality for unresectable tumors, involving trans-arterial injection of microspheres embedded with a radio-isotope Yttrium-90. The therapeutic radiation dose is selectively delivered as the microspheres permanently embed themselves within the tumor vascular bed. Use of SIRT has been conventionally aimed at treating primary hepatic tumors (hepatocellular carcinoma) or colorectal and neuroendocrine metastases. Numerous reviews are available for these tumor types. However, little is known or reviewed on non-colorectal or non-neuroendocrine primaries. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to systematically review the current literature to evaluate the effects of Yttrium-90 radioembolization on non-conventional liver tumors including those secondary to breast cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, ocular and percutaneous melanoma, pancreatic cancer, renal cell carcinoma, and lung cancer.

Metastatic liver disease from non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine, non-sarcoma cancers: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Hepatic resection of liver metastases of non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine, and non-sarcoma (NCNNNS) primary malignancies seems to improve survival in selected patients. The aims of the current review were to describe long-term results of surgery and to evaluate prognostic factors for survival in patients who underwent resection of NCNNNS liver metastases.

METHODS

We identified 30 full texts (25 single-center and 5 multicenter studies) published after year 1995 and published in English with a total of 3849 patients. For NCNNNS liver metastases, 83.4 % of these subjects were resected.

RESULTS

No prior systematic reviews or meta-analyses on this topic were identified. All studies were case series without matching control groups. The most common primary sites were breast (23.8 %), genito-urinary (21.8 %), and gastrointestinal tract (19.8 %). The median 5- and 10-year overall survival were 32.3 % (range 19-42 %) and 24 % (indicated only in two studies, range 23-25 %), respectively, with 71 % of R0 resections.

CONCLUSIONS

There is evidence suggesting that surgery of NCNNNS metastases is safe, feasible, and effective if treatment is part of a multidisciplinary approach and if indication is based on the prognostic factors underlined in literature analysis.

The benefits of liver resection for non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine liver metastases: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Defining the benefits of resection of isolated non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine (NCRNNE) liver metastases is difficult. To better understand the survival benefit in this group of patients, we conducted a systematic review of the previous literature.

METHODS

Medline, Web of Knowledge, and manual searches were performed using search terms, such as "liver resection" and "primary tumor." Inclusion criteria were year>1990, >five patients, and median survival reported or derived. An expected median survival was calculated from weighted averages of median survivals, and differences were assessed using a permutation test.

RESULTS

A total of 7,857 references were identified. Overall 4,735 abstracts were reviewed; 120 manuscripts evaluated and of these, 73 met the study inclusion criteria. The final population consisted of 3,596 patients with renal (n=234), ovarian (n=119), testicular (n=153), adrenal (n=90), small bowel (n=28), gallbladder (n=21), duodenum (n=38), gastric (n=481), pancreatic (n=55), esophageal (n=23), head and neck (n=15), and lung (n=36) cancers, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) (n=106), cholangiocarcinoma (n=13), sarcoma (n=189), and melanoma (n=643). The greatest expected median was 63 months for genitourinary (GU) primaries (n=549; range 5.4-142 months) followed by 44.4 months for breast cancer (n=1,013; range 8-74 months), 22.3 months for gastrointestinal cancer (n=549; range 5-58 months), and 23.7 months for other tumor types (n=1,082; range 10-72 months). Using a permutation test, we observed that survival was best for patients with GU primaries followed by that for breast cancer patients. Additionally, we also observed that survival was similar for those with cancer of the GI tract and other primary sites.

CONCLUSIONS

There appears to be a benefit to resection for patients with NCRNNE liver metastases. The degree of survival advantage is predicated by primary site.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastases

Over the years, early diagnosis of metastatic disease has improved and the prevalence of oligometastatic patients is increasing. Liver is a most common site of progression from gastrointestinal, lung and breast cancer and in the setting of oligometastatic patients, surgical resection is associated with increased survival. Approximately 70-90% of liver metastases, however, are unresectable and an effective and safe alternative therapeutic option is necessary for these patients. The role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) was investigated in the treatment of oligometastatic patients with promising results, thanks to the ability of this procedure to deliver a conformal high dose of radiation to the target lesion and a minimal dose to surrounding critical tissues. This paper was performed to review the current literature and to provide the practice guidelines on the use of stereotactic body radiotherapy in the treatment of liver metastases. We performed a literature search using Medical Subject Heading terms "SBRT" and "liver metastases", considering a period of ten years.

Outcome of operative therapy of hepatic metastatic stomach carcinoma: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

In general, hepatic metastasis from stomach carcinoma has an unfavorable prognosis. In addition, there are often further metastases in other organs, such as peritoneal carcinomatosis. The major aim of the present study was to investigate a potential curative surgical approach in these patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-one patients with hepatic metastases from stomach cancer were treated in the University Clinic Erlangen-Nürnberg. The data were collected retrospectively from 1972 to 1977 and prospectively since 1978 at the Erlangen Cancer Registry. The time frame of this retrospective analysis from patients who had surgical resection of hepatic metatases from gastric cancer was from 1972 to 2008. The median age of the patients was 65 years, and the ratio of men to women was 2:1.

RESULTS

Atypical or anatomical resections of segments were possible in 21 cases. Larger operations, such as hemihepatectomy (right/left), were performed in 10 patients. The postoperative complication rate was 29%, and the hospital mortality was 6%. The five-year survival rate was 13%; R0 resection was achieved in 23 patients. We also found a significant difference in the 5-year survival rate between synchronous and metachronous metastases (0 vs. 29%; p < 0.001) and R0 resected patients (p = 0.002). Patients with solitary metastases had a significantly better median survival than patients with multiple metastases (21 vs. 4 months; p < 0.005.)

CONCLUSIONS

The overall survival in our study was 13%; therefore gastric cancer with liver metastases is not in every case a palliative situation. It seems that patients with liver metastases benefit from resection, especially if the metastases are metachronous (p < 0.001) and solitary, provided that a curative R0 resection has been achieved. An interdisciplinary approach with neoadjuvant chemotherapy appears useful. Additional controlled studies should be conducted.

Hepatocellular Carcinomas and Primary Liver Tumors as Predictive Factors for Postoperative Mortality after Liver Resection: A Meta-Analysis of More than 35,000 Hepatic Resections

Liver resection is considered the therapeutic gold standard for primary and metastatic liver neoplasms. The reduction of postoperative complications and mortality has resulted in a more aggressive approach to hepatic malignancies. For the most part, results of liver surgery have been published by highly experienced institutions, but the observations of highly specialized units results may not reflect the current status of hepatic surgery, underestimating mortality and complications. The objective of this study is to evaluate morbidity and mortality as a result of liver resection for primary and metastatic lesions, analyzing a large number of studies with a meta-analytic process taking into account the overdispersion of data. An extensive literature search has been conducted, and 148 papers published between January 2000 and April 2008, including a total of 36,629 patients from both high-volume and low volume institutions, were included in the meta-analysis. A beta binomial model was used to provide a robust estimate of the summary event rate by pooling overdispersion binomial data from different studies. Overall morbidity and mortality after liver surgery were 29.32 per cent and 3.15 per cent, respectively. Significantly higher postoperative mortality was observed after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinomas and primary hepatic tumors. The application of a beta binomial model to correct for overdispersion of liver surgery data showed significantly higher postoperative mortality rates in patients with hepatocellular carcinomas or primary hepatic tumors after liver resection.

Adult pelvic sarcomas: a heterogeneous collection of sarcomas?

Introduction. Adult pelvic soft tissue sarcomas are a rare group of heterogeneous malignancies. These sarcomas differ from extremity and trunk soft tissue sarcomas in presentation, characteristics and response to treatment.

Methods. A retrospective analysis of patient and tumor characteristics, treatment and prognosis and prognostic factors was performed.

Results. Between 1977 and 1997, a total of 33 adult patients with soft tissue sarcomas involving the pelvis but excluding uterine leiomyosarcoma were identified. Leiomyosarcomas (18), including six GIST, and rhabdomyosarcomas (eight) were the most commonly seen tumors. At first presentation, nine patients already had metastases. The mean follow-up was 52 months (1–200). Recurrences developed in 15 of the 24 cases (63%) with tumors without metastases at first presentation; in six (25%) recurrence was locally only, in nine distant metastases occurred. The nine patients with metastatic disease at first presentation died of the disease, while eight of the 24 patients with localized disease at presentation died. One patient died of an unrelated cause, four were alive with disease, and 11 patients were alive and free of disease. The only identifiable prognostic factor of disease-free interval and overall survival was histological grade.

Conclusion. Soft tissue sarcomas of the pelvis appear to be associated with increased rate of metastasis at the time of diagnosis and higher rates of local recurrence. In this study, multi-modality treatment for most primary tumors did not show a significant benefit in recurrence rate, DFI and OST, when compared to single modality approach. Although the number of patients in this study is small, and different types of sarcomas were studied, the only identifiable predictor for survival was low histological grade of the tumors. The differences of this heterogeneous group of pelvic sarcomas with retroperitoneal, trunk and extremity sarcomas should be taken into consideration in the management of these sarcomas.

Surgery for liver metastases originating from sarcoma-case series

INTRODUCTION

Liver metastases originating from various types of sarcoma are a rare reason for hepatic resection. So far, even multicentre studies do hardly provide statistically relevant sample sizes. Thus, review of available data can provide surgeons with useful information in similar cases. Therefore, this study can be regarded more as a contribution to this pool of data than as a stand-alone paper.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study includes 10 women and five men who underwent subtotal hepatic resection for solitary (n = 4) and multiple (n = 11) liver metastases originating from sarcoma. The median tumour diameter was 60 mm (range 20-200 mm).

RESULTS

Morbidity was 33%. One patient died within 30 days after surgery. Resection was complete (R0) in 67%. Median overall survival was 33.6 months, 5-year survival 27%. The use of Pringle manoeuvre was significantly associated with poorer outcome (p = 0.014) and shorter period of recurrence-free survival (p = 0.012). Diameter of liver lesion over 50 mm showed significantly shorter recurrence-free survival (p = 0.042).

CONCLUSION

Hepatic resection may be beneficial in patients with isolated sarcoma metastasis in the liver.

Non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine, and non-sarcoma metastases of the liver: resection as a promising tool in the palliative management

PURPOSE

Hepatic resection is established as a safe procedure for colorectal, neuroendocrine, and sarcoma liver metastases. The present study evaluates whether liver resection is an option for patients with non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine, and non-sarcoma metastases of the liver.

METHODS

According to data from our prospective clinical tumor registry, we reviewed the medical records of 44 consecutive patients with non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine, and non-sarcoma liver metastases, who underwent hepatic resection from January 2000 to December 2008. Univariate Kaplan-Meier analysis and a stepwise multivariable Cox regression model were applied.

RESULTS

Following hepatic resection, mean overall survival was 21 months, and 5-year survival was 20%. Following hepatic resection, gender, histology, and chemotherapy were of prognostic value in our patient cohort in univariate analysis (p < 0.05). Multivariate survival analysis confirmed chemotherapy (p = 0.002) as an independent prognostic variable. Following initial resection of the primary tumor, synchrone occurrence of metastases, histology, localization of primary, perioperative complications, interval between initial resection of the primary tumor and resection of the metastases, and metastases in follow-up after hepatic resection were of prognostic value in univariate analysis (p < 0.05). Histology (p = 0.017) and interval between resection of the primary and resection of the metastases (p = 0.030) were confirmed as independent prognostic variables in multivariate survival analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatic resection seems to be a safe and promising additive for a selective group of patients with non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine, and non-sarcoma metastases of the liver.

Thermal ablation of hepatic malignancy: useful but still not optimal

The mortality associated with primary and metastatic hepatic malignancies remains high because few patients are candidates for hepatic resection or transplantation. Resection is the most effective treatment for liver tumors but may be contraindicated by factors such as the tumor's location; hepatic transplantation can cure primary hepatocellular carcinoma and underlying cirrhosis, but a donor may not be immediately available. When resection or transplantation is not possible, thermal ablation is a reasonable therapeutic option. Effective destruction of tumors can be achieved with low recurrence rates and minimal complications or risk of death. In patients with primary hepatic malignancy, ablation treatment does not preclude subsequent transplantation. Although radiofrequency ablation is currently the most widely used thermal ablative technique for hepatic malignancy, microwave ablation is gaining popularity and eventually may prove to be more effective.

Hepatic resection for noncolorectal nonendocrine liver metastases: analysis of 1,452 patients and development of a prognostic model

OBJECTIVE

To determine the utility of hepatic resection (HR) in the treatment of patients with noncolorectal nonendocrine liver metastases (NCNELM).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The place of HR in the treatment of NCNELM remains controversial, primarily due to the limitations of previously published reports and the heterogeneity of primary tumor sites and histologies.

METHODS

A multivariate risk model was developed by analyzing prognostic factors and long-term outcomes in 1452 patients with NCNELM treated with HR at 41 centers from 1983 to 2004.

RESULTS

Hepatic metastases were solitary in 56% and unilateral in 71% (mean diameter, 50.5 mm). Extrahepatic metastases were present in 22%. The most common primary sites were breast (32%), gastrointestinal (16%), and urologic (14%). The most common histologies were adenocarcinoma (60%), GIST/sarcoma (13.5%), and melanoma (13%). R0 resection was achieved in 83% of patients with a 60-day mortality rate of 2.3% and a major complication rate of 21.5%. Tumor recurred in 67% of patients (liver, 24%; extrahepatic, 18%; both, 25%). Overall and disease-free survivals at 5 years were 36% and 21% and at 10 years were 23% and 15%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, factors associated with poor prognosis were patient age >60 years, nonbreast origin, melanoma or squamous histology, disease-free interval <12 months, extrahepatic metastases, R2 resection, and major hepatectomy (all P < or = 0.02). A prognostic model based on these factors effectively stratified patients into low-risk (0-3 points, 46% 5-year survival), mid-risk (4-6 points, 33% 5-year survival), and high-risk (>6 points, <10% 5-year survival) groups (P = 0.0001).

DISCUSSION

HR for NCNELM is safe and effective, with outcomes mainly dependent on primary tumor site and histology. For individual patients, a statistical model based on key prognostic factors could validate the indication for hepatic resection by predicting long-term survivals.

Hepatectomy enables prolonged survival in select patients with isolated noncolorectal liver metastasis

OBJECTIVE

This study was done to determine the benefit of undergoing liver resection for noncolorectal metastasis.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective review of all patients (n = 95) who underwent hepatic resection for a noncolorectal liver metastasis from 1990 to 2005 was performed. Primary outcomes measure was months of patient survival after liver resection.

RESULTS

Median patient age was 58 years (range 19 to 83 years). There were 37 men (38.9%) and 58 women (61.1%). The 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 2.1%, and postoperative complications developed in 15.8% of patients. Mean hospital stay was 7 days (range 4 to 25 days). Median time of survival from date of liver resection was 36 months, and 5-year survival rate was 34.9%. Primary tumor sites were identified as foregut or gastrointestinal in 16.8% and nongastrointestinal in 83.2%. Patients with a nonforegut primary tumor had a median survival time twice as long as those with foregut primaries (49 months versus 20 months, p < 0.001). Multiple liver metastases were an independent prognostic factor for worse outcomes with a hazard ratio of 3.3 (p = 0.007). No treatment-dependent variables (initial treatment modality, extent of liver resection, margins, complications) were found on multivariable analysis to be important prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

In select patients with any of a variety of malignancies metastatic to the liver, prolonged survival can result from liver resection, especially in those with a single, resectable tumor from a nongastrointestinal primary site.

Changes in indication and results after resection of hepatic metastases from noncolorectal primary tumors: a single-institutional review

BACKGROUND

The isolated occurrence of noncolorectal liver metastases is rare. The available data are inconsistent in terms of indication for surgery, treatment, and outcome, so a generally applicable therapeutic algorithm is currently lacking.

METHODS

A total of 162 patients underwent resection for noncolorectal liver metastases between 1978 and 2001. The patients were divided into two groups from different time periods (group 1, 1978-1989; group 2, 1990-2001) that were similar in terms of number of patients, operating surgeons, and surgical techniques used. The groups were compared, and the data were retrospectively analyzed with regard to indication, survival, and factors predictive for survival.

RESULTS

Resection was performed to remove liver metastases from noncolorectal gastrointestinal carcinoma (n = 50), neuroendocrine tumors (n = 12), genitourinary primary tumors (n = 11), breast carcinoma (n = 24), leiomyosarcoma (n = 15), and metastases from other primary cancers (n = 50). Extrahepatic tumor involvement was seen in 38 (23%) of the 162 cases. Sixty-two (38%) major hepatectomies and 100 (62%) minor resections were performed. In 100 (62%) of 162 patients, a curative resection (R0) could be achieved. Overall 2- and 5-year survival rates of 49% and 26%, respectively, were observed, and the median survival was 23 months. Survival was significantly longer in patients who underwent an R0 resection.

CONCLUSIONS

In selected patients, resection of noncolorectal liver metastases is associated with a 5-year survival rate of up to 50%. Resection of liver metastases from gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas correlates with a poor prognosis. Extrahepatic metastases may be considered a relative contraindication for liver resection.