Success of serial external electrical cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation in maintaining sinus rhythm. A randomized study

Electrocardiographic predictors of early recurrence of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Electrical cardioversion (ECV) is an effective method for restoring sinus rhythm after atrial fibrillation (AF). However, early recurrence of AF occurs in a significant number of patients after ECV. This study aimed to identify electrocardiographic (ECG) predictors of early AF recurrence after ECV.

METHODS

A total of 272 patients with persistent AF undergoing successful ECV were consecutively enrolled in this study. We investigated clinical, echocardiographic, and ECG data. The 12-lead ECG parameters were measured during sinus rhythm right after ECV using a digital caliper. The early AF recurrence was defined as recurrence within 2 months.

RESULTS

Of the 272 patients, 165 patients (60.7%) experienced an early AF recurrence. Maximum P-wave duration (PWD) in limb leads (OR: 1.086; 95% CI: 1.019-1.157; p = .012) and P-terminal force (PTF) in V₁ (OR: 1.019; 95% CI: 1.004-1.033; p = .011) were independent predictors of early AF recurrence after ECV. The optimal cutoff value of the maximum PWD in limb leads for predicting early AF recurrence was 134 ms, characterized by 90.3% sensitivity and 72.0% specificity. Likewise, the optimal cutoff value of PTF in V₁ was 50 ms × mm, characterized by 80.0% sensitivity and 64.5% specificity.

CONCLUSION

A longer PWD (>134 ms) and a larger PTF (>50 ms × mm) were useful predictors of early recurrence of AF after successful ECV in clinical practice. A more effective rhythm control therapy such as catheter ablation or rate control strategy rather than a repeat ECV should be considered.

The Role of Anxiety in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Elective Cardioversion: An Observational Study

OBJECTIVE

Anxiety is often present among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This condition has been associated with greater symptom severity and worse quality of life in these patients. However, the influence of anxiety on the risk of AF recurrence is not well known. We aimed to define the level of anxiety in patients with persistent AF undergoing elective cardioversion (EC) and determine whether there is an association between anxiety and the risk of early AF recurrence after EC.

METHODS

Anxiety was measured before EC using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Early AF recurrence was assessed with a control electrocardiogram at 30-day follow-up.

RESULTS

We included 107 patients undergoing effective EC. Early AF recurrence was diagnosed in 40 patients (37.4%). Compared with those who remained in sinus rhythm, individuals with early AF recurrence had significantly higher levels of trait anxiety (23.1 [10.4] versus 17.9 [9.5]; p = .013) and larger left atrial volume index (45.8 [12.3] versus 37.9 [13.3] ml/m; p = .004). Both variables remained independently associated with early AF recurrence after multivariate analysis. A predictive model including trait anxiety score >20 and left atrial volume index >41 ml/m showed acceptable accuracy for the diagnosis of early AF recurrence (area under the curve = 0.733; 95% confidence interval = 0.634-0.832; p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that trait anxiety is an independent risk factor for early AF recurrence after EC. Further studies are warranted to assess the beneficial role of anxiety-reducing strategies on the outcomes of patients with AF.

The presence of fragmented QRS may predict the recurrence of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation after successful electrical cardioversion

OBJECTIVE

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common cardiac rhythm disorder, affects approximately 2% of the general population and is associated with increased risk of stroke and mortality as well as reduced exercise capacity and quality of life. After restoring normal sinus rhythm, a portion of these patients develops recurrent AF despite optimal medical treatment. In this study, we aimed to assess the relationship between the presence of fragmented QRS (fQRS) and AF recurrence following successful electrical cardioversion (ECV).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 306 patients with nonvalvular persistent AF achieving restoration of the sinus rhythm after successful ECV were included in this study. After ECV, patients were monitored at least 6 months for recurrence. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of fQRS and compared for AF recurrence during follow-up.

RESULTS

Patients were followed up for a mean time of 220 ± 113 days. AF recurred in 119 patients, corresponding to a recurrence rate of 38.8%. AF recurrence was found to be significantly increased in patients with fQRS as compared to those without fQRS (76.4% vs. 23.5%, p < .001). Furthermore, the presence of fQRS was higher in patients with recurrent AF as compared to others (57.1% vs. 11.2%, p < .001). In multiple regression analyses, the presence of fQRS was one of the independent predictors of AF recurrence (hazard ratio: 9.670, 95% CI: 4.714-19.837, p < .001).

CONCLUSION

The presence of fQRS may be associated with the recurrence of AF after successful ECV in persistent nonvalvular AF patients.

A review of factors associated with maintenance of sinus rhythm after elective electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is the most common heart-rhythm disorder, affecting about 1.5% to 2% of the population with an increased risk of mortality and morbidity due to stroke, thromboembolism, and heart failure. If the conversion back to sinus rhythm does not happen spontaneously, pharmacological or electrical cardioversion (ECV) is the next available treatment options for some patients. However, the long-term success following ECV is variable. This review describes the factors that are associated with maintenance of sinus rhythm following ECV and proposes a clinical strategy based on the available evidence.

Cardioversion and subsequent quality of life and natural history of atrial fibrillation

Cardioversion is a class I procedure for patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) pursuing rhythm control. There are few contemporary reports on quality of life and outcomes after cardioversion.

METHODS

Using the nationwide prospective ORBIT-AF registry, cardioversion patients were propensity matched 3:1 to noncardioverted patients and Cox proportional hazards modeling evaluated hospitalization at 1 year in those with and without cardioversion. Cardiovascular outcomes, AF progression, and quality of life were evaluated for the matched cohorts with and without cardioversion.

RESULTS

Among 9,642 patients, 817 patients (8%) underwent 906 cardioversions during a median follow-up of 12 (interquartile range 6-18) months. Among matched cardioverted and noncardioverted patients, 1-year cardiovascular hospitalization rates were 43% vs 21% (adjusted hazard ratio 2.2, 95% CI 1.8-2.8, P<.001), and sinus rhythm at both first and second follow-ups was 36% vs 27% (P=.042), respectively. Findings were similar among first-time cardioversion patients. Matched cardioversion patients did not exhibit greater symptom improvement (34% vs 42%) or less symptomatic progression (15% vs 4%) by European Heart Rhythm Association scores. Cardioversion was associated with AF progression with an odds ratio of 1.6 (95% CI 1.2-2.2, P=.001) after cardioversion and 2.7 (P<.001) after first cardioversion vs matched noncardioversion patients. After cardioversion, only 18% of patients not previously on an antiarrhythmic started one, less than 5% underwent ablation, and 22% stopped their antiarrhythmic.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardioversion was not associated with improved AF-related quality of life or less progression. Many patients who undergo cardioversion do not receive adjunctive rhythm control therapies. These findings may help to better inform therapeutic decision making.

Improvement of the myocardial performance index in atrial fibrilation patients treated with amiodarone after cardioversion

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the response to electrical cardioversion (EC) and the effect on the myocardial performance index (MPI) in patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

We enrolled 103 patients (mean age 69.6 ± 8.9 years, 40.7% males) with a diagnosis of persistent and long-standing persistent AF. EC was applied to all patients after one g of amiodarone administration. Echocardiographic findings before EC were compared in patients with successful versus unsuccessful cardioversions and in patients with maintained sinus rhythm (SR) versus those with AF recurrence at the end of the first month. We also compared echocardiographic data before EC versus at the end of the first month in the same patients with maintained SR.

RESULTS

SR was achieved in 72.8% of patients and was continued at the end of the first month in 69.3% of the patients. The MPI value of all patients was found to be 0.73 ± 0.21. The size of the left atrium was determined to be an independent predictor of the maintenance of SR at 1 month. In subgroup analyses, when we compared echocardiographic findings before EC and at the end of the first month in patients with maintained SR, the MPI (0.66 ± 0.14 vs 0.56 ± 0.09, p < 0.001) values were significantly decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study is the first to show impairment of the MPI, which is an indicator of systolic and diastolic function, in patients with persistent and long-standing persistent AF and improvement of the MPI after successful EC.

Prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence after cardioversion in patients with left-atrial dilation

AIMS

Little is known about the impact of left-ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction on risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence in patients with left-atrial (LA) dilation. To evaluate, in patients with symptomatic persistent AF and LA dilation, the incremental role of LV diastolic dysfunction in predicting early AF recurrence after cardioversion (CV).

METHODS AND RESULTS

From July 2011 to July 2013, 175 patients with persistent AF referred to our centre for CV were screened. Inclusion criteria were: European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) class ≥2 despite optimal medical treatment and heart rate at rest ≤80 bpm, LA volume ≥34 mL/m(2), EF > 35%, absence of untreated ischaemic disease and significant valvular disease, successful CV. Finally, 127 patients (age 64 ± 10 years, 60% EHRA ≥3, LA volume 42 ± 15 mL/m(2)) were enrolled. At 3 months, 37 (29%) patients presented AF recurrence. At univariate analysis, AF duration >90 days before CV (P < 0.01), septal e' <8 cm/s (P 0.03), and septal E/e' ratio ≥11 (P < 0.001) but no LA dimensions significantly correlated with AF recurrence. Logistic regression analysis confirmed septal E/e' ratio ≥11 as the best predictor of recurrence (OR 3.25 95% CI 1.19-8.86 P 0.001) together with an AF duration >90 days before the CV (OR 2.69 95% CI 1.01-7.53 P 0.04). At ROC curve analysis, the septal E/e' ratio ≥11 showed the best diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.66, 95% CI 0.55-0.76, P 0.007).

CONCLUSION

In this population with symptomatic persistent AF and LA enlargement, septal E/e' ratio ≥11 and AF duration >90 days predicted AF recurrence at 3 months.

Predictors of long-term maintenance of normal sinus rhythm after successful electrical cardioversion

Electrical cardioversion (EC) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common procedure performed in an attempt to restore normal sinus rhythm (NSR). Many factors predict long-term maintenance of NSR and the risk of AF recurrence. The duration of AF, cardiac size and function, rheumatic heart disease, significant mitral valve disease, left atrial enlargement, and older age are among the most common recognized factors. A number of interventions can potentially decrease the AF recurrence rate. Identifying and treating reversible causes and the use of antiarrhythmic medications in certain situations can help decrease the risk of AF recurrence. The role of the newer anticoagulants is expanding, and wider application is expected in the near future. We hope that this summary will serve as a guide to physicians and healthcare providers to address the question of who should undergo cardioversion, as there are patients who are most likely to benefit from this procedure and others that will revert back into AF within a short period. To identify who would benefit most from EC and have a reasonable chance of long-term maintenance of NSR, a thorough evaluation of each individual patient should be performed to tailor the best therapy to each individual.

Indexed left atrial volume predicts the recurrence of non-valvular atrial fibrillation after successful cardioversion

AIMS

Atrial fibrillation (AFib) induces remodelling of the left atrium (LA). Indexed LA volume (iLAV) as more accurate measure of LA size has not been evaluated as predictor of recurrence of AFib after cardioversion.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We identified 411 adults (mean age 64.1 ± 11.4 years, 34.5% women) who underwent successful cardioversion and with no history of other atrial arrhythmia, stroke, congenital heart disease, valvular dysfunction, surgery, thyroid dysfunction, acute or chronic inflammatory disease, and pacemaker. All echocardiographic data were retrieved from the laboratory database. iLAV was measured off-line using Simpson's method. Clinical characteristics and recurrence of clinical AFib were determined by review of medical records. Patients with scheduled follow-up of at least 6 months were included. About 250 patients (60.8%) developed AFib recurrence after a median (25th-75th percentile) follow-up of 345.0 (210.0-540.0) days. Patients with AFib recurrence had significantly greater iLAV than patients without AFib recurrence (39.7 ± 8.4 vs. 31.4 ± 4.6, P < 0.001). Each mL/m(2) increase in iLAV was associated with a 30% increased risk of AFib recurrence [odds ratio (OR) 1.30, confidence interval (CI) 1.23-1.38, P < 0.001]. In a multivariable model, each mL/m(2) increase in iLAV was independently associated with a 21% increase in the risk of AFib recurrence (OR 1.21, CI 1.11-1.30, P < 0.001). The areas under receiver operating characteristic curves, generated to compare LA diameter and iLAV as predictors of AFib recurrence, were 0.59 ± 0.3 and 0.85 ± 0.2, respectively (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The present study is the first to show that larger iLAV before cardioversion, as a more accurate measure of LA remodelling than LA diameter, is strongly and independently associated with higher risks of AFib recurrence.

First time and repeat cardioversion of atrial tachyarrhythmias - a comparison of outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Repeat cardioversion may be necessary in over 50% of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), but identifying responders remains challenging. This study evaluates the long-term success of direct current cardioversion (DCCV) and the clinical and echocardiographical parameters that influence them, in over 1000 sedation-cardioversion procedures undertaken at Eastbourne General Hospital between 1996 and 2006.

METHODS

A total of 770 patients of mean age (SD) 70.1(10.1) underwent 1013 DCCVs (first n = 665, repeat n = 348) for atrial tachyarrhythmias from 1996 to 2006. Time to persistent arrhythmia recurrence was compared between first and multiple DCCV, and the effect of age, gender, presence of heart disease, left atrial size, fractional shortening, arrhythmia duration, anti-arrhythmic drug therapy (AAD) and other concomitant cardiac medication was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox's Proportional-hazards model.

RESULTS

In all, 33% of first and 29% of repeat DCCVs were in sinus rhythm (SR) at 12 months (m). There was no difference in median time to arrhythmia recurrence (SE) between first and multiple procedures: 1.5 +/- 0.1 m (1.3-1.7) and 1.5 +/- 0.0 m (1.4-1.6) respectively, p = 0.45. AAD use was significantly higher, arrhythmia duration shorter and more diabetic patients underwent repeat procedures. Amiodarone, OR 0.56, p = 0.04, sotalol, OR 0.61, p = 0.02 and arrhythmia duration, < 6 m, OR 0.72, p = 0.03 were independent predictors of improved outcome in first procedures only. In patients undergoing first procedures on amiodarone or sotalol, median time to arrhythmia recurrence was longer and 12 m SR rates higher, 6.0 +/- 2.4 m (42%) than those who had a repeat procedure on the same medication, 1.5 +/- 0.1 m (33%), p = 0.06.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of first and subsequent DCCV procedures is similar, achieving a similar proportion of SR maintenance at 1 year. However, the benefits of AAD therapy are the greatest following first time procedures. Concomitant AAD therapy should be considered for all first time procedures for persistent AF.

[Therapeutic success of a prospective cardioversion protocol for persistent atrial fibrillation]

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

The best therapeutic approach for persistent atrial fibrillation has yet to be defined. Our aim was to investigate the effects of cardioversion in unselected patients with persistent atrial fibrillation who were treated according to a strict protocol involving pretreatment, cardioversion, and follow-up.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with persistent atrial fibrillation of at least 1 months' duration were included prospectively in a cardioversion protocol that involved standard antiarrhythmic pretreatment, with amiodarone being offered first, and follow-up.

RESULTS

The study included 295 patients, 87.5% of whom were taking the antiarrhythmic drug amiodarone. Sinus rhythm was restored in 92.5%, with pharmacologic cardioversion occurring in 9.5%. The recurrence rate was 33.5% in the first month and 54.9% by month 12. Antiarrhythmic treatment had to be modified in 10.8% of patients. Independent risk factors for recurrence during the first year after cardioversion were an atrial fibrillation duration greater than one year, previous cardioversion, and left ventricular dilatation. A simple risk scoring system was able to differentiate between subgroups of patients with a low, intermediate or high risk of recurrence in the first year after cardioversion.

CONCLUSIONS

Sinus rhythm was maintained for 1 year after effective cardioversion in 45.1% of patients who received homogeneous antiarrhythmic pretreatment. There were few side effects. Recurrence can be predicted using clinical variables such as left ventricular dilatation, arrhythmia duration, and previous cardioversion.

Pharmacotherapy for atrial fibrillation: is rhythm control achievable?

As the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, the health burden presented by atrial fibrillation (AF) continues to grow. One of the current dilemmas in managing AF lies in the decision of whether to pursue a rate or rhythm control strategy. Current antiarrhythmic drugs have many limitations in terms of efficacy and adverse effects, and the availability of better antiarrhythmic drugs that are effective and safe would probably improve outcomes in AF. Enthusiasm for pulmonary vein ablation procedures has been tempered by the relatively high frequency of recurrences of AF, which are often asymptomatic. Ablation also frequently converts symptomatic episodes to asymptomatic recurrences. Irrespective of whether a rate control or a rhythm control strategy is adopted in patients with persistent AF, appropriate antithrombotic therapy should be used.

Management of Atrial Fibrillation in the Emergency Department

Although atrial fibrillation remains the most common cardiac arrhythmia, the treatment and disposition remain varied. An accept-able standard of practice requires an evidence-based approach. This approach has revealed that half of the patients who present with acute atrial fibrillation will convert to sinus rhythm without intervention. In the hemodynamically stable subset, ascertaining the on-set of atrial fibrillation within 48 hours is critical because this period dictates when and if anticoagulation should be instituted and if and where electrical or chemical cardioversion needs be performed. The hemodynamically unstable patient, however, requires emergent cardioversion, irrespective of the chronicity of atrial fibrillation. An evidence-based approach may serve to optimize treatment and obviate the need for unnecessary hospital admissions.

Impact of informed consent requirements on cardiac arrest research in the United States: exception from consent or from research?

INTRODUCTION

Research in patients with life-threatening illness such as cardiac arrest is challenging since they can not consent. The Food and Drug Administration addressed research under emergency conditions by publishing new criteria for exception from informed consent in 1996. We systematically reviewed randomized trials over a 10-year period to assess the impact of these regulations.

METHODS

Case-control study of published trials for cardiac arrest (cases) and atrial fibrillation (controls.) Studies were identified by using structured searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1992 to 2002. Included were studies using random allocation in humans with cardiac arrest or atrial fibrillation prior to enrollment. Excluded were duplicate publications. Number of American trials, foreign trials and proportion of trials of American origin were compared by using regression analysis. Changes in cardiac arrest versus atrial fibrillation trials were calculated as risk differences.

RESULTS

Of 4982 identified cardiac arrest studies, 57 (1.1%) were randomized trials. The number of American cardiac arrest trials decreased by 15% (95% CI: 8, 22%) annually (P = 0.05). The proportion of cardiac arrest trials of American origin decreased by 16% (95% CI: 10, 22%) annually (P = 0.006). Of 5596 identified atrial fibrillation studies, 197 trials (3.5%) were randomized trials. The risk difference between cardiac arrest versus atrial fibrillation trials being of American origin decreased significantly (annual difference -5.8% (95% CI: -10, -0.1%), P = 0.03).

INTERPRETATION

Fewer American cardiac arrest trials were published during the last decade, when federal consent requirements changed. Regulatory requirements for clinical trials may inhibit improvements in care and threaten public health.

Effects of Pretreatment with Intravenous Flecainide on Efficacy of External Cardioversion of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Electrical cardioversion is the most effective and safe method to restore sinus rhythm in patients with persistent AF. However, at least 25% of electrical cardioversions are unsuccessful. The aim of the present study was to evaluate, in a prospective, randomized and double-blind study, the efficacy of a pretreatment with intravenous flecainide in patients who underwent electrical cardioversion. Fifty-four consecutive patients with persistent AF, mean arrhythmia duration 8 (mean 3-18) weeks, were randomized in two groups. In the first group (n = 26), patients received flecainide (2 mg/kg as a 30-minute IV infusion) before electrical cardioversion. In the second group (n = 28), 100 mL IV infusion of 5% glucose was administered 30 minutes before electrical cardioversion. The study evaluated the (1). acute efficacy of electrical cardioversion, (2). mean and maximal energy required, (3). mean number of shocks needed, and (4). incidence of complications. The two groups were similar in terms of age, sex, mean AF duration, left ventricular systolic function, atrial dimension, and cardiovascular risk factors. Seventy-seven percent of patients recovered sinus rhythm with electrical cardioversion. No statistical difference was noted between the two groups: flecainide 19/26 (73%) versus placebo 23/28 (82%). No significant differences were found concerning mean or maximal energy and number of shocks required. No major complications were observed. After a 30-day follow-up, 54% of patients maintained sinus rhythm with no difference between the two groups. Pretreatment with intravenous flecainide before electrical cardioversion is not useful in reducing technical failure of cardioversion, however, flecainide does not diminish the effectiveness of electrical cardioversion.

Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure:

AF in Heart Failure. Atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure are commonly occurring cardiac disorders that often exist concomitantly. The prognostic significance of the presence or absence of atrial fibrillation, as an independent risk factor, in patients with heart failure remains controversial. Antiarrhythmic drugs with good hemodynamic profiles and neutral effects on survival are preferred treatments for converting atrial fibrillation and maintaining sinus rhythm. Other standard therapies for congestive heart failure, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and beta-blockers also have a role in the treatment of these coexisting disease states. The article presents an overview of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and reviews the prevalence, prognostic significance, and efficacy of various antiarrhythmic agents for the conversion and maintenance of sinus rhythm.

Rate or rhythm control in persistent atrial fibrillation?

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained tachyarrhythmia encountered in clinical practice, with the majority of patients aged > 65 years. With an increasingly ageing population, the burden of AF in society continues to rise. One of the principal controversies in AF management is whether to control the ventricular rate and accept the underlying rhythm, or to attempt to achieve sinus rhythm. Until recently there were no clinical trial data directly comparing a rate versus rhythm strategy, and most physicians have opted for rhythm control, based on its theoretical benefits. We present an up-to-date evidence-based overview of the relative merits of rate versus rhythm control in AF, including data from five recent randomized trials. We draw conclusions from these studies and present evidence-based guidance on when to adopt which approach in routine clinical practice.

Old and new antiarrhythmic drugs for converting and maintaining sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation: comparative efficacy and results of trials

In managing atrial fibrillation (AF), the main therapeutic strategies include rate control, termination of the arrhythmia, and the prevention of recurrences and thromboembolic events. Safety and efficacy considerations are important in optimizing the choice of an antiarrhythmic drug for the treatment of AF. Recently approved antiarrhythmics, such as dofetilide, and promising investigational drugs, such as azimilide and dronedarone, may change the treatment landscape for AF. For medical conversion of recent-onset AF, class IC antiarrhythmic drugs, administered as an oral bolus, have been demonstrated to be the most efficacious pharmacologic conversion agents. Intravenous ibutilide and oral dofetilide both have efficacies superior to placebo in controlled trials for converting persistent AF. Comparative trials in paroxysmal AF have demonstrated that flecainide, propafenone, quinidine, and sotalol are equally effective in preventing recurrences of AF. Amiodarone has been demonstrated to be more efficacious than propafenone or sotalol in the Canadian Trial of Atrial Fibrillation. In persistent AF, twice-daily dofetilide has been shown to be as or more effective than low-dose sotalol given twice daily for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with AF. Trials have demonstrated that subjective adverse effects are less frequent with class IC drugs, sotalol, and dofetilide compared with such drugs as quinidine. In patients without structural heart disease, flecainide, propafenone, and D,L-sotalol are the initial drugs of choice, given their reasonable efficacy, low incidence of subjective side effects, and lack of significant end-organ toxicity. Treating AF in patients with left ventricular dysfunction can be difficult because of associated electrophysiologic derangements, potential proarrhythmic concerns, and negative inotropic effects of antiarrhythmics. Some data exist suggesting that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers can prevent AF either by preventing atrial dilation and stretch-induced arrhythmias or by blocking the renin-angiotensin system. In post-myocardial infarction patients, D,L-sotalol, dofetilide, and amiodarone-and in congestive heart failure patients, amiodarone and dofetilide-have demonstrated neutral effects on survival in controlled trials. In the Congestive Heart Failure Survival Trial of Antiarrhythmic Therapy (CHF-STAT), amiodarone lowered the frequency of AF development and improved left ventricular ejection fraction over time. In CHF-STAT, there was lower mortality in patients who converted from AF to sinus rhythm. Dofetilide decreased rehospitalization for congestive heart failure in the Danish Investigations of Arrhythmia and Mortality on Dofetilide (DIAMOND) trials. Neutral effects on survival and favorable hemodynamics have positioned amiodarone and dofetilide as the antiarrhythmics of choice in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. In post-myocardial infarction patients, sotalol is an additional agent to consider for treatment of AF in this setting.