Mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone therapy in children with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome

Efficacy and safety of oral cyclophosphamide versus mycophenolate mofetil in childhood nephrotic syndrome: an open-label comparative study

INTRODUCTION

There is a scarcity of research comparing the efficacy of cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil in childhood nephrotic syndrome. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral cyclophosphamide (CYC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome in terms of the proportion of children who have been off steroids for at least 6 months without proteinuria (responders).

METHODS

This open-label retrospective-prospective comparative study was conducted in a pediatric nephrology clinic of a referral center for children between 1 and 18 years of age with FR/SD nephrotic syndrome. Group A consisted of patients who received oral cyclophosphamide (100, 25% female) at a dose of 2-2.5 mg/kg once daily for a period of 8-12 weeks. Group B consisted of patients who received oral mycophenolate mofetil (n = 61, 18% female) (dose: 800-1200 mg/m2) for at least 12 months. Responders were defined as children who were off steroids for at least 6 months along with absence of proteinuria.

RESULTS

In the CYC group, 50% of the patients were responders, whereas 54% of the patients in the MMF group were responders (p = 0.614). The time to first relapse with CYC was 7 months (IQR 5.25-11) compared to 7 months (IQR 3.5-12) with MMF (p = 0.092). The relapse rate in the CYC group was 1.77 relapses per patient-year compared to 1.295 relapses per patient-year in the MMF group. The difference in relapse rate was significant (-0.474; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.86 relapses/person-year) (p value = 0.009). Multivariate analysis revealed that an age of less than 5 years at the start of treatment was a significant factor for a better response to MMF (p value = 0.039, OR = 2.988, CI -1.055-8.468).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of MMF was similar to that of CYC in terms of response (6 months without steroids) in children with FR/SD nephrotic syndrome. MMF showed a favorable response in terms of the frequency of relapse and treatment failure. REGISTRATION OF THE STUDY WITH CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY OF INDIA: ( http://ctri.nic.in ;CTRI/2021/06/034421) (Dt: 28/06/2021).

Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study Reviewing the Effectiveness of Mycophenolate Mofetil on Saudi Children With Nephrotic Syndrome

Background Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) is the most common form of nephrotic syndrome (NS) in children. It is often associated with minimal change disease (MCD). Corticosteroid therapy is the initial treatment, but many patients experience relapses, leading to steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS) or frequently relapsing steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (FR-SSNS). To avoid prolonged steroid use, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is used as an immunosuppressive alternative. MMF is safe and effective for treating SDNS and FR-SSNS in children, with studies showing reduced relapse rates. The current study aims to evaluate MMF's effectiveness and safety in Saudi children with NS and identify factors that affect its efficacy. Methods A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at King Abdullah Specialized Children's Hospital (KASCH) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The study included children aged one to 14 years diagnosed with NS who received MMF therapy. Data were collected from medical records from 2000 to 2020. Ethical considerations were followed, and statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 25 (released 2017; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States). Baseline characteristics and responsiveness to MMF were examined. Results In our study, 45 participants (25 males, 20 females) with NS were treated with MMF. Most participants were steroid-dependent (84.44%) and had frequent relapses. MMF was effective in 84.4% of cases, with a significant reduction in relapse; the mean number of relapses decreased from 3.5 before MMF to 1.6 after MMF (p-value = 0.00002). Moreover, 40% of the participants were completely free of relapse after the introduction of MMF. The average duration of the MMF therapy was 45 months. Post-MMF side effects were rare but documented. Gastrointestinal symptoms were extremely rare. Elevated liver enzyme levels were reported in 8.88% (four cases) of the participants. Leukopenia, a more common adverse effect, was reported in 26.66% of cases during the MMF therapy. The average daily dose of steroid was reduced from 12.5 mg/day pre MMF to 2 mg/day post MMF with a p-value of 0.00229. Conclusion Our study evaluated the use of MMF in 45 participants with NS. We found that MMF was effective in 84.4% of cases, leading to a significant reduction in the number of relapses. Post-MMF side effects were relatively rare, except for leukopenia that was reported in 26.66%. In addition, the average rate of reduction of steroid exposure before and after MMF was significant. These findings suggest that MMF is a promising treatment option for children with NS and an alternative therapy to long-term steroid use, due to its safety and effectiveness, although close monitoring for potential side effects is essential.

"Clinical Efficacy of Mycophenolate Mofetil versus Levamisole Therapy in Frequently Relapsing and Steroid Dependent Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome" - A retrospective comparative analysis

BACKGROUND

Children with Frequently relapsing (FR) or Steroid dependent (SD) Nephrotic Syndrome (NS) often develop side effects of corticosteroids. Various steroid-sparing agents are in practice, but only a few studies exist so far which have compared the safety and efficacy of these two commonly used agents.

METHODS

We did a retrospective medical records review of children with FRNS or SDNS who had Levamisole or MMF as a steroid-sparing agent with a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. The aim was to compare the course of our patients on MMF and Levamisole. Our primary objective was to determine the number of children in sustained remission and those with the infrequently relapsing course on Levamisole and MMF and, the median time to relapse in months in the two groups. The secondary objective was to compare time to first relapse and number of relapses in FRNS and SDNS group children on MMF and Levamisole.

RESULTS

A total of 88 children (34% female) with diagnosis FR/SDNS (44 each) were included in the study. Thirty-nine patients took Levamisole, while forty-nine received MMF therapy. The median age of presentation at the relapsing course was 4.2 years. The proportion of children with sustained remission or infrequent relapsing (IFR) course on MMF was 73.6%, compared to 48.71% on Levamisole (p-value 0.015). Also, the median time to first relapse was 12 months (24, 1.5) and 4.5 months (24, 1) on respective medications.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical outcome was superior in the MMF group than Levamisole, especially in SDNS patients, and also MMF was more efficacious in maintaining sustained remission. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Update on the treatment of steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome

Steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) is a rare condition that develops primarily in preadolescent children after the age of 1 year. Since the 1950s, oral corticosteroids have been the mainstay of treatment of all children presenting with nephrotic syndrome, with most patients responding within 4 weeks to an oral course of prednisone (PDN). However, corticosteroids have important side effects and 60-80 % of patients relapse, developing frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent forms. For these reasons, many patients require second-line steroid-sparing immunosuppressive medications that have considerably improved relapse-free survival, while avoiding many PDN-related toxicities. Since most patients will eventually heal from their disease with a normal kidney function, the morbidity of SSNS is primarily related to side effects of drugs that are used to maintain prolonged remission. Therefore, treatment is essentially based on balancing the use of different drugs to achieve permanent remission with the lowest cumulative number of side effects. Treatment choice is based on the severity of SSNS, on patient age, and on drug tolerability. This review provides an update of currently available therapeutic strategies for SSNS.

Mycophenolate Mofetil after Rituximab for Childhood-Onset Complicated Frequently-Relapsing or Steroid-Dependent Nephrotic Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Rituximab is the standard therapy for childhood-onset complicated frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (FRNS/SDNS). However, most patients redevelop FRNS/SDNS after peripheral B cell recovery.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to examine whether mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) administration after rituximab can prevent treatment failure (FRNS, SDNS, steroid resistance, or use of immunosuppressive agents or rituximab). In total, 39 patients (per group) were treated with rituximab, followed by either MMF or placebo until day 505 (treatment period). The primary outcome was time to treatment failure (TTF) throughout the treatment and follow-up periods (until day 505 for the last enrolled patient).

RESULTS

TTFs were clinically but not statistically significantly longer among patients given MMF after rituximab than among patients receiving rituximab monotherapy (median, 784.0 versus 472.5 days, hazard ratio [HR], 0.59; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.34 to 1.05, log-rank test: P=0.07). Because most patients in the MMF group presented with treatment failure after MMF discontinuation, we performed a post-hoc analysis limited to the treatment period and found that MMF after rituximab prolonged the TTF and decreased the risk of treatment failure by 80% (HR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.50). Moreover, MMF after rituximab reduced the relapse rate and daily steroid dose during the treatment period by 74% and 57%, respectively. The frequency and severity of adverse events were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of MMF after rituximab may sufficiently prevent the development of treatment failure and is well tolerated, although the relapse-preventing effect disappears after MMF discontinuation.

Pediatric idiopathic steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome: diagnosis and therapy -short version of the updated German best practice guideline (S2e) - AWMF register no. 166-001, 6/2020

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome is the most frequent glomerular disease in children in most parts of the world. Children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) generally have a good prognosis regarding the maintenance of normal kidney function even in the case of frequent relapses. The course of SSNS is often complicated by a high rate of relapses and the associated side effects of repeated glucocorticoid (steroid) therapy. The following recommendations for the treatment of SSNS are based on the comprehensive consideration of published evidence by a working group of the German Society for Pediatric Nephrology (GPN) based on the systematic Cochrane reviews on SSNS and the guidelines of the KDIGO working group (Kidney Disease - Improving Global Outcomes).

Efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin with rituximab versus rituximab alone in childhood-onset steroid-dependent and frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Guidelines for the treatment of steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS) and frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome (FRNS) are lacking. Given the substantial impact of SDNS/FRNS on quality of life, strategies aiming to provide long-term remission while minimising treatment side effects are needed. Several studies confirm that rituximab is effective in preventing early relapses in SDNS/FRNS; however, the long-term relapse rate remains high (~70% at 2 years). This trial will assess the association of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIgs) to rituximab in patients with SDNS/FRNS and inform clinicians on whether IVIg's immunomodulatory properties can alter the course of the disease and reduce the use of immunosuppressive drugs and their side effects.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We conduct an open-label multicentre, randomised, parallel group in a 1:1 ratio, controlled, superiority trial to assess the safety and efficacy of a single infusion of rituximab followed by IVIg compared with rituximab alone in childhood-onset FRNS/SDNS. The primary outcome is the occurrence of first relapse within 24 months. Patients are allocated to receive either rituximab alone (375 mg/m²) or rituximab followed by IVIg, which includes an initial Ig dose of 2 g/kg, followed by 1.5 g/kg injections once a month for the following 5 months (maximum dose: 100 g).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has been approved by the ethics committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes) of Ouest I and authorised by the French drug regulatory agency (Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé). Results of the primary study and the secondary aims will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03560011.

Comparison of treatment options in adults with frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent minimal change disease

Background

Studies comparing all treatment options for frequently-relapsing/steroid-dependent (FR/SD) minimal change disease (MCD) in adults are lacking.

Methods

Medical records of 76 adults with FR/SD MCD who were treated with corticosteroids as the first-line therapy were reviewed. Treatment options were compared for the time to relapse, change of therapy and progression (relapse on full-dose treatment).

Results

Second-line treatments included rituximab (RTX; n = 13), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; n = 12), calcineurin inhibitors (CNI; n = 26) and cyclophosphamide (CTX; n = 16). During the second-line treatments, 48 (71.6%) patients relapsed at median 17 (range 2–100)  months. The majority of relapses occurred during dose tapering or off drug. Twenty of 65 (30.8%) changed therapy after the first relapse. The median time to relapse after the second line was 66 versus 28 months in RTX versus non-RTX groups (P = 0.170). The median time to change of treatment was 66 and 44 months, respectively (P = 0.060). Last-line treatment options included RTX (n = 8), MMF (n = 4), CNI (n = 3) and CTX (n = 2). Seven (41.2%) patients had a relapse during the last-line treatment at median 39 (range 5–112)  months. The median time to relapse was 48 versus 34 months in the RTX versus non-RTX groups (P = 0.727). One patient in the RTX group died presumably of heart failure. No major adverse event was observed. During the median follow-up of 81 (range 9–355)  months, no patients developed end-stage renal disease.

Conclusions

Relapse is frequent in MCD in adults. Patients treated with RTX may be less likely to require a change of therapy and more likely to come off immunosuppressive drugs.

Generation and Validation of a Limited Sampling Strategy to Monitor Mycophenolic Acid Exposure in Children With Nephrotic Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) plays an increasingly important role in the treatment of children with nephrotic syndrome, especially in steroid sparing protocols. Recent publications show the relationship of exposure to its active moiety mycophenolic acid (MPA) and clinical efficacy. Performance of full-time pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles, however, is inconvenient and laborious. Established limited sampling strategies (LSS) to estimate the area under the concentration (AUC) versus time curve of MPA (MPA-AUC) in pediatric renal transplant recipients cannot be easily transferred to children suffering from nephrotic syndrome, mainly because of the lack of concomitant immunosuppressive therapy. We therefore aimed for the generation and validation of a LSS to estimate MPA exposure to facilitate therapeutic drug monitoring in children with nephrotic syndrome.

METHODS

We performed 27 complete PK profiles in 23 children in remission [mean age (±SD):12.3 ± 4.26 years] to generate and validate an LSS. Sampling time points were before administration (C0) and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours after the administration of MMF. MPA was measured by enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique. There was no concomitant treatment with calcineurin inhibitors.

RESULTS

Mean daily dose of MMF was 927 ± 209 mg/m of body surface area resulting in a mean MPA-AUC0-12 value of 59.2 ± 29.3 mg × h/L and a predose level of 3.03 ± 2.24 mg/L. Between-patient variability of dose-normalized MPA-AUC0-12 was high (coefficient of variation: 45.5%). Correlation of predose levels with the corresponding MPA-AUC0-12 was moderate (r = 0.59) in a subgroup of 18 patients (20 PK profiles, generation group). An algorithm based on 3 PK sampling time points during the first 2 hours after MMF dosing (estimated AUC0-12 = 8.7 + 4.63 × C0 + 1.90 × C1 + 1.52 × C2) was able to predict MPA-AUC with a low percentage prediction error (3.88%) and a good correlation of determination (r = 0.90). Validation of this algorithm in a randomized separate group of 6 patients (7 PK profiles, validation group) resulted in comparably good correlation (r = 0.95) and low percentage prediction error (5.57%).

CONCLUSIONS

An abbreviated profile within the first 2 hours after MMF dosing gives a good estimate of MPA exposure in children with nephrotic syndrome and hence has the potential to optimize MMF therapy.

Effect of different rituximab regimens on B cell depletion and time to relapse in children with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Several studies have demonstrated that rituximab (RTX) improves relapse-free survival in patients with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS). However, these studies used various RTX regimens and there are few data comparing these regimens in children with SDNS. In this retrospective study, we assessed the effect of three different initial RTX regimens on both time to B cell reconstitution and to first relapse.

METHODS

Sixty-one SDNS patients receiving a first course of RTX were included. Group 1 received one injection of 100 mg/m², group 2 received one injection of 375 mg/m², and group 3 received two injections of 375 mg/m² at day 0 and day 7. Time to B cell reconstitution and time to first relapse and respective risk factors were studied.

RESULTS

Median time to B cell reconstitution was 2.5 [1.8-3.5], 5.0 [3.9-6.0], and 6.6 [4.6-7.8] months in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. RTX regimen was associated with time to B cell reconstitution (HRs group 2 vs. 3, 4.07 [1.96-8.48]; group 1 vs. 3, 11.13 [4.04-30.67]). One-year relapse-free survival was 50% [58-77], 59% [42-76], and 72% [46-87] in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. RTX regimen was associated with risk of relapse (HRs group 2 vs. 3, 1.55 [0.51-4.65]; group 1 vs. 3, 4.98 [1.15-21.60]).

CONCLUSIONS

The initial dose of rituximab impacts time to B cell reconstitution and the probability of relapse. Risk of relapse is also associated with patient characteristics, suggesting that RTX regimen could be modified for each patient to balance efficacy, cost, and side effects.

Bayesian treatment comparison using parametric mixture priors computed from elicited histograms

A Bayesian methodology is proposed for constructing a parametric prior on two treatment effect parameters, based on graphical information elicited from a group of expert physicians. The motivating application is a 70-patient randomized trial to compare two treatments for idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in children. The methodology relies on histograms of the treatment parameters constructed manually by each physician, applying the method of Johnson et al. (2010). For each physician, a marginal prior for each treatment parameter characterized by location and precision hyperparameters is fit to the elicited histogram. A bivariate prior is obtained by averaging the marginals over a latent physician effect distribution. An overall prior is constructed as a mixture of the individual physicians' priors. A simulation study evaluating several versions of the methodology is presented. A framework is given for performing a sensitivity analysis of posterior inferences to prior location and precision and illustrated based on the idiopathic nephrotic syndrome trial.

Mycophenolate mofetil for sustained remission in nephrotic syndrome

The clinical application of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has significantly widened beyond the prophylaxis of acute and chronic rejections in solid organ transplantation. MMF has been recognized as an excellent treatment option in many immunologic glomerulopathies. For children with frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome (FRNS) or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS) experiencing steroid toxicity, MMF has been recommended as a steroid-sparing drug. Uncontrolled studies in patients with FRNS and SDSN have shown that many patients can achieve sustained remission of proteinuria with MMF monotherapy. Three randomized controlled trials have similarly demonstrated that MMF is beneficial in these patients, but less effective than the calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporin A or tacrolimus. Some, but not all, patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) may also respond to MMF, usually given in combination with other drugs, with partial or complete remission. There are important limitations to the interpretation and comparability of these studies including study design, sample size, patient selection, clinical endpoints, carry-over effects, and duration of follow-up. In all studies, MMF had relatively few side effects, no nephrotoxicity, or no systemic toxicity. MMF is teratogenic, and contraceptive advice is required in females. There is a poor correlation between MMF dose and mycophenolic acid (MPA) exposure and significant inter- and intra-patient variability in drug pharmacokinetics. A higher estimated MPA-AUC_0-12 target range than recommended for pediatric renal transplant recipients is essential to prevent relapses. Therefore, therapy should be guided by drug monitoring to avoid relapses. Further studies are needed to test the efficacy of MMF in inducing remission and, as part of a combination therapy, achieving sustained remission in patients with SRNS.

Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil versus levamisole in frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome: an open-label randomized controlled trial

Both levamisole and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) prevent relapses in patients with frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome; however, their efficacy has not been compared prospectively. This single-center, randomized, open-label trial enrolled 149 children ages 6-18 years with frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive therapy with MMF (750-1000 mg/m² daily) or levamisole (2-2.5 mg/kg on alternate days) for 1 year; prednisolone was discontinued by 2-3 months. In intention-to-treat analyses, the frequency of relapse was similar between participants treated with MMF and levamisole (mean difference -0.29 relapses/patient-year; 95% confidence interval -0.65, 0.08). Relapse rates declined to almost one-third of baseline for both treatment groups. Therapy with MMF was not superior to levamisole in terms of the proportions of participants with sustained remission (40.8% vs. 34.2%), frequent relapses (14.5% vs. 16.4%), or treatment failure, a composite outcome of frequent relapses, steroid resistance, or significant steroid toxicity (15.8% vs. 20.6%). These outcomes were also similar in time to event analyses. Changes in anthropometry and blood pressure were similar between the groups, and the rates of adverse effects were low in both groups. Flow cytometry in 32 participants demonstrated similar proportions of B cells and CD4+, CD8+, T helper (Th)1, Th2, Th17, and T regulatory (Treg) cells during follow-up. Therapy with MMF was not superior to levamisole in the frequency of relapses, likelihood of sustained remission or corticosteroid sparing in children with frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome. Registration CTRI/2012/02/002394.

Study protocol: mycophenolate mofetil as maintenance therapy after rituximab treatment for childhood-onset, complicated, frequently-relapsing nephrotic syndrome or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome: a multicenter double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (JSKDC07)

Background

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) is the most common chronic glomerular disease in children. Approximately 80–90% of patients with childhood INS have steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS), and can obtain remission with steroid therapy, while the remainder have steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS). Furthermore, approximately 50% of children with SSNS develop frequently-relapsing nephrotic syndrome (FRNS) or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS). Children with FRNS/SDNS are usually treated with immunosuppressive agents such as cyclosporine, cyclophosphamide, or mizoribine in Japan. However, 10–20% of children receiving immunosuppressive agents still show frequent relapse and/or steroid dependence during or after treatment, which is defined as complicated FRNS/SDNS. Furthermore, 30% of SRNS patients who obtain remission after additional treatments such as cyclosporine also turn out to be complicated FRNS/SDNS. For such complicated FRNS/SDNS patients, rituximab (RTX) is currently used; however, recurrence after RTX treatment also remains an open issue. Because long-term use of existing immunosuppressive drugs has limitations, development of a novel treatment for maintenance therapy after RTX is desirable. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunosuppressive drug with fewer side effects than cyclosporine or cyclophosphamide. Importantly, recent studies have reported the efficacy of MMF in children with nephrotic syndrome.

Methods

We conduct a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MMF after RTX therapy in children with complicated FRNS/SDNS. Patients are allocated to either RTX plus MMF treatment group, or RTX plus placebo treatment group. For the former group, MMF is administered at a dose of 1000–1200 mg/m²/day (maximum 2 g/day) twice daily for 17 months after RTX treatment. The primary endpoint is time-to-treatment failure (development of frequent relapses, steroid dependence or steroid resistance).

Discussion

The results will provide important data on the use of MMF as maintenance therapy after RTX to prevent complicated FRNS/SDNS patients from declining into treatment failure. In future, MMF in conjunction with RTX treatment may permit increased duration of remission in ‘complicated’ FRNS/SDNS cases.

Trial registration

This trial was prospectively registered to UMIN Clinical Trials Registry on June 23, 2014 (UMIN Trial ID: UMIN000014347).

Initial treatment of steroid-sensitive idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in children with mycophenolate mofetil versus prednisone: protocol for a randomised, controlled, multicentre trial (INTENT study)

INTRODUCTION

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome is the most common glomerular disease in childhood with an incidence of 1.8 cases per 100 000 children in Germany. The treatment of the first episode implies two aspects: induction of remission and sustainment of remission. The recent Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes, American Academy of Pediatrics and German guidelines for the initial treatment of the first episode of a nephrotic syndrome recommend a 12-week course of prednisone. Despite being effective, this treatment is associated with pronounced glucocorticoid-associated toxicity due to high-dose prednisone administration over a prolonged period of time. The aim of the INTENT study (Initial treatment of steroid-sensitive idiopathic nephrotic syndrom in children with mycophenolate mofetil versus prednisone: protocol for a randomised, controlled, multicentre trial) is to show that an alternative treatment regimen with mycophenolic acid is not inferior regarding sustainment of remission, but with lower toxicity compared with treatment with glucocorticoids only.

METHODS AND DESIGN

The study is designed as an open, randomised, controlled, multicentre trial. 340 children with a first episode of steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome and who achieved remission by a standard prednisone regimen will be enrolled in the trial and randomised to one of two treatment arms. The standard care group will be treated with prednisone for a total of 12 weeks; in the experimental group the treatment is switched to mycophenolate mofetil, also for a total of 12 weeks in treatment duration. The primary endpoint is the occurrence of a treated relapse within 24 months after completion of initial treatment.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval for this trial was granted by the ethics committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Heidelberg (AFmu-554/2014). The study results will be published in accordance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement and the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials guidelines. Our findings will be submitted to major international paediatric nephrology and general paediatric conferences and submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed, open-access journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

DRKS0006547; EudraCT2014-001991-76; Pre-result.

DATE OF REGISTRATION

30 October 2014; 24 February 2017.

Distinctive vasculopathy with systemic involvement due to levamisole long-term therapy: a case report

Background

Levamisole belongs to the antihelminthic class of drugs that are sometimes administered to patients with frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome, owing to its steroid-sparing effects. Neutropenia and skin lesions, compatible with vasculitis, have been reported as drug complications, but they are rarely associated with any systemic involvement.

Case presentation

We report a case of a 9-year-old Arab boy with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome who was treated with levamisole after his third relapse. The drug was initially well tolerated, but mild isolated neutropenia occurred 6 months after levamisole administration. This was followed by cutaneous vasculitis of both ears and the left cheek. The patient also developed hepatosplenomegaly and anemia. Levamisole was discontinued, and his disease remained in remission. All the systemic manifestations disappeared gradually over the course of 1 month. The patient remained in remission until 1 year after levamisole withdrawal, when clinical nephrosis recurred.

Conclusions

Despite levamisole’s being a useful drug for maintaining remission in steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome, patients on long-term levamisole therapy should be monitored closely to prevent serious complications that can easily be resolved by simple drug withdrawal.

Mycophenolate mofetil following glucocorticoid treatment in Henoch-Schönlein purpura nephritis: the role of early initiation and therapeutic drug monitoring

BACKGROUND

Henoch-Schönlein purpura (HSP) is the most common vasculitis in childhood and traditionally considered as a self-limiting disease. However, renal involvement can unfavorably determine long-term prognosis. The reported regimens to treat HSP nephritis (HSPN) are diverse, indicating that the most effective treatment remains controversial.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center study involved 18 patients presenting with HSPN and nephrotic-range proteinuria. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and identify a cut-off level for estimated mycophenolic acid area under the curve (eMPA-AUC_0-12h) values, which can predict complete remission with high sensitivity.

RESULTS

Despite prior insufficient therapeutic response to corticosteroids, 89% of patients showed a significant decrease in proteinuria after 1 month of MMF treatment. None of them relapsed during treatment; however, two children relapsed after discontinuation. Based on results of a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, an eMPA-AUC_0-12h >56.4 mg*h/l was a predictor for complete remission within 3 months (80% sensitivity, 83.3% specificity, p = 0.035). During MMF administration, we encountered no adverse event requiring discontinuation of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that MMF is a safe and potentially effective secondary treatment option for children with HSPN to achieve and maintain long-term remission without serious side effects. To achieve complete remission within 3 months, resolve severe inflammatory glomerular lesions, and avoid progression to chronic kidney disease, we propose timely diagnosis and early initiation of MMF with an eMPA-AUC_0-12h value of 56.4 mg*h/l.

Efficacy of Mycophenolate Mofetil as a Remission Maintaining Agent in Idiopathic Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome

Of all cases of idiopathic steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (NS) in children, 40%-75% cases need long-term continuous steroids and/or other immunosuppressants to maintain remission, the effects of which on growth and renal function remain an issue of concern. The study aimed at exploring the safety and efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as a remission-maintaining agent in children with a diagnosis of frequent relapsing or steroid-dependent NS (FRNS/SDNS) requiring continuous medication for at least 1 year. Thirty-two children thus included received MMF (1000-1200 mg/m²/day) for 7 months along with tapering doses of oral prednisolone if it was being given from before with an attempt at tapering at 0.25 mg/kg/month ultimately stopping it altogether. Individuals were followed up for at least 5 more months after stopping MMF. Out of 32 children, 26 had SDNS and 6 had FRNS with male:female ratio being 2.2:1. The mean standard deviation (± SD) age of onset of disease was 2.72 ± 1.3 years and that entry to the study was 7.17 ± 2.2 years. Significant fall in number of relapses was observed following the introduction of MMF (110 in pre-MMF12 month period vs. 52 in post-MMF 12 months [p = 0.002]). The mean relapse rate/year/patient also decreased from 3.43 ± 1.26 to 1.62 ± 1.14 after entry in the study. Significant reduction of the cumulative dose of steroid regarding mean ± SD of mg/kg/year was also found following the introduction of MMF (190.9 ± 47.81 vs. 119.09 ± 60.09 [p = 0.001]). MMF is an efficacious agent in maintaining remission and reducing steroid requirement in children with FRNS and SDNS.

Children with Steroid-Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome: A Single -Center Experience

Background

Nephrotic syndrome (NS) is one of the most frequent glomerular diseases among children. While most of the children with primary NS respond to steroid treatment, 10 to 20% of the patients are steroid-resistant, and the best therapy for such cases has never been defined.

Objective

The present study aimed to evaluate steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) patients.

Materials and methods

Our research included 50 children (56% female and 44% male) with NS. NS was defined as the presence of edema, massive proteinuria, hypoalbuminemia and hyperlipidemia. Patients with NS were treated according to international protocol. SRNS was diagnosed in patients with idiopathic NS based on lack of complete remission despite treatment with steroids. Renal biopsy was performed in 22 patients with SRNS at the Pediatric Clinic II of the University Clinical Center in Sarajevo (UCCS). Histopathologic analyzes of renal biopsy were performed at the Department of Pathology, University Clinical Center in Tuzla (UCCT). Patients with SRNS, after kidney biopsy were treated with nonsteroidal immunosuppressant's.

Results

Eight (36.4%) of the 22 patients who had undergone renal biopsies had minimal change disease (MCNS) and seven (31.8%) had focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). The immunosuppressive drugs used in SRNS were Cyclosporine (CsA), Cyclophosphamide (CYC), Mycophenolat mofetil (MMF) and Rituximab (RTX). Three patients (13.6%) did not respond to any treatment and had developed end - stage renal disease (ESRD).

Conclusion

With current treatments, some children will ultimately achieve a sustained remission with one of the second line or third line of the proposed drugs. Patients with refractory NS will go to progression towards ESRD. The rapid development of molecular genetics will give a new contribution to the pathogenesis and treatment of this disease.

[Treatments of steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome in children]

Primary nephrotic syndrome (NS) is the most common glomerular disease in children. It is characterized by massive proteinuria and hypoalbuminemia. It typically has a sudden onset and more than 70% of patients will experience at least one relapse. An immunological origin has long been postulated, although the precise molecular mechanisms underlying the disease remain debated. Steroids are the first-line therapy with cumulative dose and duration of initial treatment varying among countries. Steroid-sparing agents may be indicated in case of steroid-dependency or frequent relapses. However, no consensus exists regarding the different treatment options. These treatments are mostly suspensive and therefore, need to be prolonged for several months. Levamisole, an antihelminthic drug, also has an immunomodulatory function, and alone or in combination with steroids, it can decrease cumulative steroid dose and relapses. It is usually well tolerated, and its principal side effects are cytopenia and elevated liver enzymes. Mycophenolate mofetil is an immunosuppressive agent whose reported side effects are cytopenia and diarrhea. Calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporine or tacrolimus) have long been used in steroid-dependent patients. Their major side effects are hirsutism, gum hypertrophy, and nephrotoxicity, leading to interstitial kidney fibrosis and chronic kidney disease. Cyclophosphamide is an efficient treatment but its gonadal toxicity is a major drawback to its use. More recent drugs such as rituximab are very effective but require hospitalization for the infusion and induce an increased risk of opportunistic infection, prolonged neutropenia, and anaphylaxis. In this review, we present the available treatments, their indications, and the side effects.

Mycophenolate Sodium for Children with Frequently Relapsing or Steroid Dependent Nephrotic Syndrome

In this retrospective study, patients with idiopathic frequently-relapsing nephrotic syndrome (FRNS) (n=27) and steroid dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS) (n=13) who received enteric coated mycophenolate sodium (ECMS) for at least 6 months, were included for analysis. Primary outcome was response to ECMS, which was defined as complete if there were no relapses, partial response if there was 1 relapse and no response if there were 2 or more relapses within 6 months of initiation. The mean (SD) dose of ECMS was 985.24 (190.82) mg/m2/day. Thirty patients(75%) had complete response, eight (20%) had partial and two (5%) patients did not respond at 6 months. ECMS seems to be a safe and effective as steroid sparing agent in children with FRNS/SDNS.

Efficacy of higher-dose levamisole in maintaining remission in steroid-dependant nephrotic syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Levamisole (LEV) has been used successfully on an alternate-day regime of 2.5 mg/kg in steroid-dependant nephrotic syndrome (SDNS) to maintain remission. This pilot study was carried out between 2010 and 2015 at a single center in Sri Lanka to evaluate the efficacy of LEV prescribed at 2.5 mg/kg daily, which is double the alternate-day dose.

METHODS

Sequential children with SDNS, relapsing more than twice in the preceding 12 months and previously treated with LEV and low-dose alternate-day prednisolone (0.1-0.6 mg/kg) were recruited to the study. This group received LEV (2.5 mg/kg) daily with the same dose of alternate-day prednisolone for 1 year. Urine protein excretion was recorded by parents on a daily basis, and the presence of 3+ proteinuria on 3 consecutive days was considered a relapse. Full blood counts and liver function tests were performed every 3 months to monitor for adverse effects.

RESULTS

Sixty-four children were enrolled into the study; six were excluded due to prescription of other immunosuppressive drugs. Median age was 7.9 years; 33 were boys. The number of relapse episodes was 163 [mean per patient 2.8 ± standard deviation (SD) 0.8] in patients on alternate-day LEV and 77 (mean 1.3 ± SD 0.9) for those on daily LEV during the 12-month period of observation. The P value 0.000 (according to the Wilcoxon signed-rank test) was <0.001. No major adverse events were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

The prescription of daily LEV is effective and safe for maintaining SDNS remission.

Mycophenolate mofetil is inferior to tacrolimus in sustaining remission in children with idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

Studies of nephrotic syndrome show that substitution of calcineurin inhibitors by mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) enables sustained remission and corticosteroid sparing and avoids therapy associated adverse effects. However, controlled studies in patients with steroid resistance are lacking. Here we examined the effect of switching from therapy with tacrolimus to MMF on disease course in an open-label, one-to-one randomized, controlled trial on children (one to 18 years old), recently diagnosed with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome, at a referral center in India. Following six months of therapy with tacrolimus, patients with complete or partial remission were randomly assigned such that 29 received MMF while 31 received tacrolimus along with tapering prednisolone on alternate days for 12 months. On intention-to-treat analyses, the proportion of patients with a favorable outcome (sustained remission, infrequent relapses) at one year was significantly lower (44.8%) in the MMF group than in the tacrolimus group (90.3%). The incidence of relapses was significantly higher for patients treated with MMF than tacrolimus (mean difference: 1.05 relapses per person-year). While there was no difference in the proportion of patients with sustained remission, the risk of recurrence of steroid resistance was significantly higher for patients receiving MMF compared to tacrolimus (mean difference: 20.7%). Compared to tacrolimus, patients receiving MMF had a significantly (71%) lower likelihood of a favorable outcome and significantly increased risk of treatment failure (frequent relapses, steroid resistance). Thus, replacing tacrolimus with MMF after six months of tacrolimus therapy for steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children is associated with significant risk of frequent relapses or recurrence of resistance. These findings have implications for guiding the duration of therapy with tacrolimus for steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome.

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: the EBV hypothesis

Steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome is marked by a massive proteinuria and loss of podocytes foot processes. The mechanism of the disease remains debated but recent publications suggest a primary role of Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV). EBV replication in the peripheral blood is found in 50% of patients during the first flare of the disease. The genetic locus of steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome was also identified as influencing antibodies directed against EBNA1. EBV is able to establish, latent benign infection in memory B cells that display phenotypes similar to antigen-selected memory B cells. Consistently, memory B cells reconstitution after rituximab infusion is a predictor of the relapse of proteinuria. We suggest that a specific anti-EBNA1 antibody internalized in the podocytes via the neonatal Fc receptor might cross-react with a major protein present in the same cell trafficking compartment. The diversion of this major podocyte protein in the urinary space and the subsequent depletion is supposed to result in podocyte damages with loss of foot processes and massive proteinuria. Immunosuppression of B cells and subsequent clearance of anti-EBNA1 antibodies would lead to a restoration of the normal level of the protein allowing recovery of proteinuria and of normal podocyte morphology.

Mycophenolate Mofetil Therapy in Children With Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome: Does Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Make a Difference?

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) necessitates administration of corticosteroids or corticoid-sparing agents in 60% of the cases for prolonged periods resulting in serious adverse effects.

METHODS

To avoid these complications, we investigated the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in our retrospective single-center study with 15 patients presenting with complicated courses of INS and aspired to estimate a cutoff level for mycophenolic acid-area under the curve (MPA-AUC) values, which can predict relapses with high sensitivity.

RESULTS

Seven of 15 patients stayed in remission while receiving MMF. Average frequency of relapses was 1.39 (0.28-2.5) per year. In case of relapses, patients had lower predose and estimated AUC0-12 levels of MPA (P = 0.02 and 0.001, respectively). Based on the results of receiver operating characteristic analysis, we consider an estimated MPA-AUC0-12 lower than 44.6 mg·h·L(-1) as a risk factor for future relapses (91% sensitivity, 57% specificity, P = 0.06) because the prevalence of relapse is significantly lower (0.07 versus 0.5, P = 0.02), if the estimated MPA-AUC0-12 is >44.6 mg·h·L(-1). During MMF administration, we did not detect any adverse event requiring discontinuation of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, we demonstrate MMF as an alternative treatment for children with complicated INS to maintain remission without serious side effects. Furthermore, we propose a higher therapeutic target range of MPA-AUC0-12 (>45 mg·h·L(-1)) than used in transplanted children underlining the crucial role of therapeutic drug monitoring.

Mycophenolate mofetil in nonlupus glomerulonephropathy

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) initially found widespread use in the immunoprophylaxis of rejection in organ transplantation. It has subsequently been used in lupus glomerulonephritis, where early studies have shown it to be effective in induction and maintenance therapy. The randomized studies have mostly studied small groups of patients and their conclusions do need to be confirmed in larger studies. MMF has also been used in small numbers of patients in a variety of nonlupus glomerulopathies, which have different underlying immunopathology as well as clinical course, including IgA nephropathy, membranous nephropathy, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, hepatitis-C-associated glomerulonephritis and even Goodpasture's syndrome. In this article, we discuss its use in such nonlupus glomerular diseases.

Mycophenolate mofetil in steroid-dependent idiopathic nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Prospective studies have established the mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) efficiency in childhood idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) but reports on the long-term outcome are lacking. Moreover, the search for factors influencing its efficiency would be useful to define its place among the other treatments.

METHODS

We performed a monocentric retrospective study including 96 children with steroid-dependent INS followed for 4.7 years (median) (IQ 3-6) after the onset of MMF treatment. The characteristics of responder patients (n = 74), as defined by a 50 % decrease of relapse rate and/or a 60 % decrease of steroid dose, and of non-responder patients (n = 22) were compared by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

Withdrawal of prednisone was achieved in 48/96 patients after a median duration of 18.1 months (IQ 7.8-30.0) of MMF. Only 26/48 patients did not relapse under MMF alone. After MMF was stopped in these patients, only six remained in remission without any treatment at last follow-up. Responders had a shorter time to remission at the first flare (9.5 vs. 15 days, p = 0.02), a shorter disease duration prior to the onset of MMF (22.2 vs. 94.5 months, p = 0.001), and were younger at the MMF initiation (6.7 vs. 10.1 years, p = 0.02) than non-responder patients. The age of MMF initiation was an independent factor associated with efficiency (OR = 0.80, 95 % CI [0.69, 0.93], p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

MMF is more efficient in young patients treated early in the disease course. Nevertheless, MMF has no remnant effect while nearly all patients relapsed after withdrawal of the drug.

Mycophenolic Acid Pharmacokinetics and Relapse in Children with Steroid-Dependent Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolic acid can improve clinical outcome in organ transplantation and lupus, but data are scarce in idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. The aim of our study was to investigate whether mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics are associated with disease control in children receiving mycophenolate mofetil for the treatment of steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

This was a retrospective multicenter study including 95 children with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome treated with mycophenolate mofetil with or without steroids. Area under the concentration-time curve of mycophenolic acid was determined in all children on the basis of sampling times at 20, 60, and 180 minutes postdose, using Bayesian estimation. The association between a threshold value of the area under the concentration-time curve of mycophenolic acid and the relapse rate was assessed using a negative binomial model.

RESULTS

In total, 140 areas under the concentration-time curve of mycophenolic acid were analyzed. The findings indicate individual dose adaptation in 53 patients (38%) to achieve an area under the concentration-time curve target of 30-60 mg·h/L. In a multivariable negative binomial model including sex, age at disease onset, time to start of mycophenolate mofetil, previous immunomodulatory treatment, and concomitant prednisone dose, a level of area under the concentration-time curve of mycophenolic acid >45 mg·h/L was significantly associated with a lower relapse rate (rate ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.46 to 0.89; P=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Therapeutic drug monitoring leading to individualized dosing may improve the efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil in steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome. Additional prospective studies are warranted to determine the optimal target for area under the concentration-time curve of mycophenolic acid in this population.

Evaluation of mycophenolate mofetil or tacrolimus in children with steroid sensitive but frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome

AIM

Approximately 30-40% of children with steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome have frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome (FRNS) or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS). Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and tacrolimus (TAC) are often alternative treatment choices for these patients.

METHODS

A single-center prospective study was conducted to compare the efficacy of MMF or TAC in reducing relapses and maintaining remission in children with FRNS or SDNS. Of the 72 recruited patients, either MMF (20∼30 mg/kg/d, n = 34) or TAC (0.05∼0.15 mg/kg/d, n = 38) was administered for 12 months.

RESULTS

The mean 6-month relapse rates decreased from 2.56 episodes before therapy to 0.76 episodes in the first 6 months after therapy (c(2) = 44.362, p < 0.001) and 0.67 in the next 6 months (c(2) = 37.817, p < 0.001) in the MMF group. In the TAC group, the mean 6-month relapse rates decreased from 2.39 episodes before therapy to 0.41 episodes in the first 6 months after therapy (c(2) = 62.242, p < 0.001) and 0.42 in next 6 months (c(2) = 67.482, p < 0.001). No significant difference in the relapse rate was found between the groups (before therapy, c(2) = 0.902, p = 0.637; first 6 months, c(2) = 5.358, p = 0.147; second 6 months, c(2) = 4.089, p = 0.252). And there was also no significant difference in cumulative sustained remission and the incidence of adverse events between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In combination with low-dose steroids, MMF or TAC presented similar efficacy in maintaining remission in children with FRNS/SDNS in the present study. Therapy with MMF or TAC is a promising strategy with a moderate risk of side effects in children who are steroid sensitive but have FRNS/SDNS.

Non-corticosteroid immunosuppressive medications for steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome in children

BACKGROUND

About 80% to 90% of children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) have relapses. Of these children, around half relapse frequently, and are at risk of adverse effects from corticosteroids. Non-corticosteroid immunosuppressive medications are used to prolong periods of remission in these children; however, these medications have significant potential adverse effects. Currently, there is no consensus about the most appropriate second line agent in children who are steroid sensitive, but who continue to relapse. This is the third update of a review first published in 2001 and updated in 2005 and 2008.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of non-corticosteroid immunosuppressive medications in relapsing SSNS in children.

SEARCH METHODS

For this update we searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register to June 2013.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs were included if they compared non-corticosteroid immunosuppressive medications with placebo, prednisone or no treatment, different non-corticosteroid immunosuppressive medications and different doses, durations or routes of administration of the same non-corticosteroid immunosuppressive medication.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias of the included studies and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using a random-effects model and results expressed as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 32 studies (1443 children) of which one study is still ongoing. In the 31 studies with data, risk of bias assessment indicated that 11 (37%) and 16 (53%) studies were at low risk of bias for sequence generation and allocation concealment respectively. Six (29%) studies were at low risk of performance and detection bias. Twenty seven (87%) and 19 (60%) studies were at low risk of incomplete and selective reporting respectively. Alkylating agents (cyclophosphamide and chlorambucil) significantly reduced the risk of relapse at six to 12 months (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.60) and 12 to 24 months (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.46) compared with prednisone alone. There was no significant difference in relapse risk at two years between chlorambucil and cyclophosphamide (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.80 to 2.13). There was no significant difference at one year between intravenous and oral cyclophosphamide (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.29). Cyclosporin was as effective as cyclophosphamide (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.48 to 2.35) and chlorambucil (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.53) at the end of therapy while levamisole (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.89) was more effective than steroids alone. However the effects of cyclosporin and levamisole were not sustained once treatment was stopped. In one small study cyclosporin significantly reduced the relapse rate compared with mycophenolate mofetil (MD 0.75, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.49). Limited data from a cross-over study suggested that cyclosporin was more effective than mycophenolate mofetil in maintaining remission. In steroid- and cyclosporin-dependent disease, rituximab significantly reduced the risk of relapse at three months compared with conventional therapy. Mizoribine and azathioprine were no more effective than placebo or prednisone alone in maintaining remission.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Eight-week courses of cyclophosphamide or chlorambucil and prolonged courses of cyclosporin and levamisole reduce the risk of relapse in children with relapsing SSNS compared with corticosteroids alone. Limited data indicate that mycophenolate mofetil and rituximab are valuable additional medications for relapsing SSNS. However clinically important differences in efficacy are possible and further comparative studies are still needed.

Mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporin A in children with frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome

The severe side effects of long-term corticosteroid or cyclosporin A (CsA) therapy complicate the treatment of children with frequently relapsing steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (FR-SSNS). We conducted a randomized, multicenter, open-label, crossover study comparing the efficacy and safety of a 1-year treatment with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; target plasma mycophenolic acid trough level of 1.5-2.5 µg/ml) or CsA (target trough level of 80-100 ng/ml) in 60 pediatric patients with FR-SSNS. We assessed the frequency of relapse as the primary endpoint and evaluated pharmacokinetic profiles (area under the curve [AUC]) after 3 and 6 months of treatment. More relapses per patient per year occurred with MMF than with CsA during the first year (P=0.03), but not during the second year (P=0.14). No relapses occurred in 85% of patients during CsA therapy and in 64% of patients during MMF therapy (P=0.06). However, the time without relapse was significantly longer with CsA than with MMF during the first year (P<0.05), but not during the second year (P=0.36). In post hoc analysis, patients with low mycophenolic acid exposure (AUC <50 µg⋅h/ml) experienced 1.4 relapses per year compared with 0.27 relapses per year in those with high exposure (AUC>50 µg⋅h/ml; P<0.05). There were no significant differences between groups with respect to BP, growth, lipid levels, or adverse events. However, cystatin clearance, estimated GFR, and hemoglobin levels increased significantly with MMF compared with CsA. These results indicate that MMF is inferior to CsA in preventing relapses in pediatric patients with FR-SSNS, but may be a less nephrotoxic treatment option.

Mycophenolate mofetil for primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: systematic review

BACKGROUND

Current treatments for primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), including corticosteroids and cyclosporine, are not satisfactory for all patients and may induce significant side effects. Antidotal benefits of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as an add-on to these immunosuppressive therapies have been reported. This review aims to systematically summarize the efficacy and safety of MMF as a treatment for primary FSGS.

METHOD

Controlled and uncontrolled clinical trials evaluating the use of MMF in primary FSGS patients were identified from nine electronic databases and four clinical trial registries. Kidney failure was selected as the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Three randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 18 uncontrolled pre-post studies were included. Results from RCTs revealed that MMF is no more effective than cyclosporine or cyclophosphamide for promoting kidney function preservation when corticosteroid is used as baseline treatment. One underpowered RCT reported that MMF provides no extra benefit on top of prednisolone, but the result is unlikely to be reliable. Amongst the small, uncontrolled pre-post studies, three of them used MMF as monotherapy, two of which reported successful prevention of kidney failure in all patients. The remaining 15 uncontrolled studies used MMF as add-on therapy and 11 reported kidney failure as an outcome. Amongst them, eight reported no patients developed kidney failure. MMF was generally well tolerated with mild adverse effects, including abdominal discomfort, diarrhea and infections.

CONCLUSIONS

MMF tended to show beneficial effects in uncontrolled studies which recruited patients with resistance to routine treatments, but such favorable results have only been reported in small, uncontrolled trials. No RCT results suggested that MMF was a good alternative to cyclosporine or cyclophosphamide. The role of MMF as an add-on to current therapies, or as monotherapy, should further be evaluated.

Rituximab is an efficient and safe treatment in adults with steroid-dependent minimal change disease

Development of steroid dependency in patients with nephrotic syndrome may require a long-term multi-drug therapy at risk of drug toxicity and renal failure. Rituximab treatment reduces the steroid dosage and the need for immunosuppressive therapy in pediatric patients. Here we retrospectively analyze the efficacy and safety of rituximab in adult patients with steroid-dependent minimal change disease. To do this, we analyzed the outcome of all adult patients treated with rituximab for steroid-dependent minimal change nephrotic syndrome over a mean follow-up of 29.5 months (range 5.1-82 months). Seventeen patients with steroid-dependent or frequently relapsing minimal change nephrotic syndrome, unresponsive to several immunosuppressive medications, were treated with rituximab. Eleven patients had no relapses after rituximab infusion (mean follow-up 26.7 months, range 5.1-82 months) and nine of them were able to come off all other immunosuppressive drugs and steroids during follow-up. Six patients relapsed at least once after a mean time of 11.9 months (mean follow-up 34.5 months, range 16.9-50.1 months), but their immunosuppressive drug treatment could be stopped or markedly reduced during this time. No adverse events were recorded. Thus, rituximab is efficient and safe in adult patients suffering from severe steroid-dependent minimal change disease. Prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm this study.

Permeability factors in nephrotic syndrome and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis

Circulating permeability factors have been identified in the plasma of patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). Post-transplant recurrence of proteinuria, improvement of proteinuria after treatment with plasmapheresis, and induction of proteinuria in experimental animals by plasma fractions each provide evidence for such plasma factors. Advanced proteomic methods have identified candidate molecules in recurrent FSGS. We have proposed cardiotrophin-like cytokine-1 as an active factor in FSGS. Another potential permeability factor in FSGS is soluble urokinase receptor. In our studies, in vitro plasma permeability activity is blocked by substances that may decrease active molecules or block their effects. We have shown that the simple sugar galactose blocks the effect of FSGS serum in vitro and decreases permeability activity when administered to patients. Since the identities of permeability factors and their mechanisms of action are not well defined, treatment of FSGS is empiric. Corticosteroids are the most common agents for initial treatment. Calcineurin inhibitors, such as cyclosporine A, and tacrolimus and immunosuppressive medications, including mycophenylate, induce remission is some patients with steroid-resistant or -dependent nephrotic syndrome. Therapies that diminish proteinuria and slow progression in FSGS as well as other conditions include renin-angiotensin blockade, blood pressure lowering and plasma lipid control. Use of findings from in vitro studies, coupled with definitive identification of pathogenic molecules, may lead to new treatments to arrest FSGS progression and prevent recurrence after transplantation.

Second-line options for refractory steroid-sensitive and -resistant nephrotic syndrome

Although initially, many children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome respond to steroid therapy, a repeated course for patients with relapses often causes significant steroid toxicity. Patients with frequent relapses or steroid dependency thus require alternative treatment, and so far, cyclophosphamide or levamisole have been regarded as first-choice options, although the latter is no longer available in many countries. Data are accumulating that mycophenolic acid may be an alternative for these patients. Calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporine A or tacrolimus) are usually effective and are often used after cytotoxic treatment, but long-term treatment is necessary, raising concerns regarding the accumulation of side effects. Still, some patients show a tendency to relapse even on this maintenance regimen and some even have a refractory course that creates a medical dilemma. For this situation, recent data have demonstrated an effect of monoclonal antibodies directed to B cells - rituximab, a drug that may also prove to be a therapeutic option in less complicated cases. Patients that do not respond to initial steroid treatment need genetic testing and a renal biopsy, since focal segmental glomerulosclerosis may be present. Treatment options include pulse methylprednisolone, often in addition to calcineurin inhibitors (mainly cyclosporine but also, recently, tacrolimus). Cyctotoxic treatment, especially intravenous cyclophosphamide, has been found to be effective in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome by some studies but is inferior to calcineurin inhibitors. In addition, mycophenolic acid and rituximab have been used in children with primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; however, response seems to be inferior in comparison with patients with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome. Taken together, idiopathic nephrotic syndrome, including steroid-sensitive as well as steroid-resistant patients, is a potentially serious disorder. Although much progress has been made in recent years and a wide arsenal of immunological interventions is available, some patients have a treatment refractory course. Prospective studies or at least standardization of treatment for complicated cases is urgently needed.

Treatment of children with Henoch-Schönlein purpura nephritis with mycophenolate mofetil

BACKGROUND

Henoch-Schönlein purpura (HSP) can progress to Henoch-Schönlein purpura nephritis (HSPN), and the most effective management remains unclear. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for treating pediatric patients with HSPN and nephrotic-range proteinuria.

METHODS

Twelve children, seven boys and five girls, mean age 8.33 (range 6-12) years at the time of HSPN diagnosis with nephrotic-range proteinuria, were treated with MMF. All patients failed steroid treatment, and mean proteinuria at the time of MMF initiation was 5.6 g/d. MMF dosage ranged from 20 to 25 mg/kg per day. Patients also received an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (cliazapril) at MMF initiation. Mean follow-up was 3.9 (range 2.3-5.5) years.

RESULTS

All patients responded to MMF at a mean of 2.5 (range 1-4 months). Among the 12 patients, MMF was administered for 10 months in five, 12 months in six, and 15 months in one. At last follow-up, all patients had negative proteinuria and normal renal function, and no relapses were noted. No serious adverse effects of MMF were noted in any patient.

CONCLUSION

MMF is useful for treating pediatric patients with HSPN and nephrotic-range proteinuria.

Mycophenolate mofetil for steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome: a phase II Bayesian trial

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has emerged as a new therapeutic option in steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS). We conducted a phase II Bayesian trial of MMF in children with SDNS. Phase II trials, usually single-arm studies, investigate the effect of new treatments. Standard Fleming's procedure relies on observed results (relapse rate during the trial), whereas Bayesian approach combines observed results with prior information (expected relapse rate according to prior studies and clinical experience). All patients were required to have received prior alkylating-agent treatment. Sixty-seven percent of them had also received levamisole. Patients received MMF (1,200 mg/m(2)/day) and prednisone according to a defined schedule [reduction of alternate-day (e.o.d) dose to 50% of pre-MMF dose at 3 months, 25% at 6 months]. Twenty-four children (median age 6.0 years, 2.8-14.4) entered the study and 23 completed it. Bayesian analysis showed that adding four patients would not change significance of results, allowing stopping inclusions. Four patients relapsed during the first 6 months (estimated probability 17.6%, 95% credibility interval: 5.4-35.0%) and two at months 8 and 11.5. In the 19 patients free of relapse during the first 6 months, median (Q1-Q3) prednisone maintenance dose decreased from 25 (10-44) to 9 (7.5-11.2) mg/m(2) e.o.d (p < 0.001) and cumulative dose from 459 (382-689) to 264 (196-306) mg/m(2)/month (p < 0.001) before and on MMF respectively. Pre-MMF patient characteristics and MMF pharmacokinetics did not differ between patients with or without relapse. MMF reduces relapse rate and steroid dose in children with SDNS and should be proposed before cyclosporine and cyclophosphamide.

Short-term efficacy of rituximab versus tacrolimus in steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome

Although therapy with intravenous (IV) rituximab and tacrolimus reduces the relapse rate in steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS), studies on comparative efficacy are lacking. We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with difficult-to-treat SDNS who had previously received levamisole, cyclophosphamide and/or mycophenolate mofetil, then treated with either rituximab or tacrolimus and followed for 12 months. Between January 2009 and April 2010, ten patients received two to three doses of IV rituximab (375 mg/m(2)/week) and 13 received tacrolimus (0.1-0.2 mg/kg/day) for 12 months; none had previously received either agent. Patients received tapering doses of alternate-day prednisolone; other immunosuppressive agents were discontinued. The mean age of the patients at treatment initiation with rituximab and tacrolimus was 12.2 ± 2.3 and 12.3 ± 3.0 years, respectively. The respective pre-treatment relapse rates (3.1 ± 1.1 and 3.5 ± 1.6 relapses per year) and cumulative prednisolone dose (137.2 ± 69.4 and 140.5 ± 59.0 mg/kg/year) were similar. Therapy resulted in a decline in relapse rate in both groups (P < 0.001). The number of relapses in the rituximab and tacrolimus groups was similar at 6 months (0.3 ± 0.5 vs. 0.3 ± 0.6 episodes, respectively), 12 months (0.8 ± 1.0 vs. 0.9 ± 1.1 episodes) and last follow-up (1.2 ± 1.0 vs. 1.5 ± 1.3 episodes). There were no differences in relapse-free survival at 6, 12 and 18 months. Therapy resulted in a significant decline in the cumulative prednisolone dose (67.2% in the rituximab group and 43.6% in the tacrolimus group) and a reduced body mass index. These findings suggest that in our patients with difficult-to-treat SDNS, treatment with two to three doses of rituximab was as effective as 12 months of therapy with tacrolimus in terms of steroid sparing and reduction in the relapse rate.

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) treatment efficacy in children with primary and secondary glomerulonephritis

INTRODUCTION

The aim of our study was to analyse the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as part of the complex immunosuppressive therapy in children with different types of primary and secondary glomerulonephritis, who were not eligible for the standard treatment routine suggested by evidence-based guidelines.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study group comprised 85 children with proteinuric glomerulopathies hospitalized between 2007 and 2010, who were non-responders to immunosuppressive therapy. The dose of MMF was established as 1 g/m(2)/24 h. Remission was defined as negative proteinuria in three consecutive urinalyses.

RESULTS

The patients were divided into 4 groups: idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (n = 35), primary glomerulonephritis (n = 15), auto-antibody associated glomerulonephritis (n = 20) and lupus nephropathy (LN, n = 15). Ten patients from the first group (29%) and 5 patients each from the second and third group (34% and 25% respectively) did not respond to MMF therapy. On the other hand, all the children diagnosed with LN have reached clinical and biochemical remission.

CONCLUSIONS

Alternative rescue MMF therapy should always be taken into consideration in proteinuric patients who are non-responders to steroids, cyclosporine A and cyclophosphamide in whom the initial glomerular filtration rate is higher than 60 ml/min/1.73m(2). It is recommended that MMF be administered as part of the standard treatment regimen in patients diagnosed with lupus nephropathy. In these groups of patients, the potent benefits of this therapy are higher than expected side-effects.

Clinical course and outcome of children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome

We conducted a retrospective study on children with primary nephrotic syndrome (NS) to evaluate the clinical course and outcome of children with steroid-sensitive NS (SSNS). The medical records of 226 children, median 3.46 years (min 1.00, max 15.08) who referred to our clinics with SSNS between January 1978 and September 2005 were reviewed and entered into the study. Minimum duration of follow-up was 5 years and maximum 20 years (median 7.25 years). Of 226 patients who were treated with corticosteroids, 38 (16.8%) had no relapse but the remaining 188 (83.2%) patients experienced several relapses of which 128 patients (56.6%) required additional immunosuppressive agents for the remission. Of these, 122 (95%) were treated with levamisole, 22 (17%) with cyclosporine, 36 (28%) with cyclophosphamide, and ten (7.8 %) treated with mycophenolate mofetil. Several patients had to switch from one medication to others due to lack of response. On the last follow-up visit, 64(28.3%) patients were still under treatment, some patients had taken all of the above-mentioned drugs but still had multiple recurrences. Only 103 (45.5%) patients were in remission off the drug more than 3 years. This study shows that nearly one-third of pediatric patients with SSNS experience frequent relapses despite the combination of multiple immunosuppressive medications, which may continue until adulthood.

New therapies in steroid-sensitive and steroid-resistant idiopathic nephrotic syndrome

Although many children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) respond initially to steroid therapy, repeated courses for patients with relapses often cause significant steroid toxicity. Patients with frequent relapses who develop steroid dependency thus require alternative treatment. The first such options have been considered to be cyclophosphamide or levamisole, although the latter is no longer available in many countries. There is also an increasing body of data indicating that mycophenolic acid (MPA) may be an alternative for these patients. Calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporine A or tacrolimus) are usually effective and often used after cytotoxic treatment, but long-term treatment with these agents is necessary, raising concerns of a possible accumulation of side effects. Some patients show a tendency to relapse even on such maintenance regimens, and some even have a refractory course that creates a medical dilemma. For this situation, recent data indicate that monoclonal antibodies directed to B-cells (e.g. rituximab) may have some effect and that such drugs may also prove to be a therapeutic option in less complicated cases. Patients that do not respond to steroid treatment need genetic testing and a renal biopsy since focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) may be present. Treatment options include pulse methylprednisolone, often in addition to calcineurin inhibitors, mainly in the form of cyclosporine, but tacrolimus has also come into recent favor. Some studies have found cytotoxic treatment, especially intravenous cyclophosphamide, to be effective in steroid resistant nephrotic syndrome, but it seems to be inferior to calcineurin inhibitors. MPA and rituximab have also been used in children with primary FSGS, but the response seems to be inferior to that in patients with steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome. Taken together, INS in both steroid-sensitive and steroid-resistant patients is a potentially complicated disorder, and despite a wide arsenal of immunological interventions, some patients have a treatment refractory course. Prospective studies or at least standardized treatment for complicated cases is urgently needed.

Development of a Bayesian estimator for the therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolate mofetil in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome

The use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) is increasing. However, the clinical benefit of its monitoring has been scarcely studied, and little is known about its pharmacokinetics in this context. The objectives of the present study were: (i) to study and model the pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid (MPA; the active moiety of MMF) in paediatric patients with INS given MMF, at all stages of the disease; (ii) to develop a Bayesian estimator (MAP-BE) for individual inter-dose area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) prediction in this population, using a limited blood sampling strategy (LSS). Full-pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of MPA collected in paediatric inpatients with INS already treated with a maintenance immunosuppressive therapy based on MMF (with no calcineurin inhibitors; CNI) were studied. A classical iterative two-stage (ITS) method was applied to model the data and develop MAP-BEs using a one-compartment open model where the absorption is described by a double gamma law allowing the description of a potential enterohepatic recirculation. The performance of the MAP-BE developed for individual exposure assessment was evaluated by the bias and precision of predicted AUCs with respect to measured, trapezoidal AUCs (reference value), and by the proportion of predicted AUCs with absolute error >20%. These PK tools were tested in an independent group of patients. Sixty PK profiles of MPA from children receiving MMF in association to corticosteroids or given alone were included in the study. Forty-five of these PK profiles were used to develop a PK model and a MAP-BE, and 15 for their validation. In the building group, the PK model fitted accurately the PK profiles of MPA: mean residual error of modelled vs. reference AUC was m±SD=-0.015±0.092 (range: -0.153 to 0.204). The MAP-BE which allowed the estimation of MPA AUC on the basis of a 20 min-60 min-180 min LSS was then developed. In the independent group of patients, its mean residual error vs. reference AUCs was m±SD=-0.036±0.145 (range: -0.205 to 0.189). Thus, a PK model and its derived MAP-BE for MMF (without any associated CNI) when given to children with INS have been developed. Clinical trials using these PK tools could test the potential impact of the therapeutic drug monitoring of MMF based on the AUC on the clinical evolution of INS.

Population pharmacokinetics and Bayesian estimator of mycophenolic acid in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome

AIMS

To develop a population pharmacokinetic model for mycophenolic acid (MPA) in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), identify covariates that explain variability and determine the Bayesian estimator of the area under the concentration-time curve over 12 h (AUC(0-12)).

METHODS

The pharmacokinetic model of MMF was described from 23 patients aged 7.4 +/- 3.9 years (range 2.9-14.9) using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling (NONMEM) software. A two-compartment model with lag-time and first-order absorption and elimination was developed. The final model was validated using visual predictive check. Bayesian estimator was validated using circular permutation method.

RESULTS

The population pharmacokinetic parameters were apparent oral clearance 9.7 l h(-1), apparent central volume of distribution 22.3 l, apparent peripheral volume of distribution 250 l, inter-compartment clearance 18.8 l h(-1), absorption rate constant 5.16 h(-1), lag time 0.215 h. The covariate analysis identified body weight and serum albumin as individual factors influencing the apparent oral clearance. Accurate Bayesian estimation of AUC(0-12) was obtained using the combination of three MPA concentrations measured just before (T(0)), 1 and 4 h (T(1) and T(4)) after drug intake with a small error of 0.298 microg h(-1) ml(-1) between estimated and reference AUC(0-12).

CONCLUSIONS

The population pharmacokinetic model of MPA was developed in children with INS. A three-point (T(0), T(1) and T(4)h) Bayesian estimator of AUC(0-12) was developed and might be used to investigate the relation between MPA pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics in children with INS and determine if there is any indication to monitor MPA exposure in order to improve patient outcome based on individual AUC-controlled MMF dosing.

Mycophenolate mofetil therapy for children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

Treating children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) has been a clinical challenge for pediatricians. We recruited 24 children (18 boys and six girls) with steroid-resistant idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (SRINS) who were <2 years. All patients were administered prednisone 2 mg/kg per day prior to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). By the end of the eighth week, MMF was initiated at 25-30 mg/kg daily for 6- 12 months. Prednisone dose was reduced stepwise. Biochemical assays were performed every 2 months. Complete remission was achieved in 15 patients, partial remission in six, and no response to MMF was noted in three. With MMF treatment, the levels of urinary protein and serum cholesterol decreased and that of serum albumin increased in a time-dependant manner. We demonstrated the MMF could reduce proteinuria in SRINS children <2 years. Our study suggests that MMF therapy might be an effective strategy for treating SRINS in children <2 years.