Ferrous sulfate does not affect mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics in kidney transplant patients

Spectroscopic investigation for the interaction of mycophenolate mofetil with ferrous ions

The interaction of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with ferrous ions (Fe(2+)) in the solid state, in water, and in polar organic solvents was investigated using (1)H-NMR, (13)C-NMR, IR, and UV-visible (Vis) spectroscopies. A red-purple colored substance was formed after grinding solid MMF and FeSO4·7H2O in a mortar. The IR spectrum of taken as a KBr tablet of the colored substance showed a new absorption band at 1651 cm(-1). Although the color disappeared when the sample was dissolved in water, it persisted in organic solvents such as MeOH or dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). The UV-Vis spectrum of a 0.25 mM MeOH solution of MMF showed a new absorption maximum at 507 nm in the presence of Fe(2+) ions, while an aqueous solution of the same mixture showed no significant change from the MMF solution. All the signals in the (13)C-NMR spectrum in DMSO-d6 solution were unambiguously assigned. Upon the addition of 0.5 eq. of Fe(2+) ions, all the carbon signals except those of the 2-morpholinoethyl group almost disappeared, which clearly indicated that the Fe(2+) ions were located far away from the 2-morpholinoethyl groups in the MMF molecules. On the basis of these results, we have concluded that the MMF-Fe(2+) complex is actually formed in the solid state as well as in polar organic solvents such as MeOH or DMSO.

Comparative pharmacokinetic study of two mycophenolate mofetil formulations in stable kidney transplant recipients

We compared steady-state pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) - Myfenax(®) (Teva) and CellCept(®) (Roche) - in stable kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). This was an international, multi-centre, randomized, open-label, two-treatment, two-sequence crossover study with a 3-month follow-up. We included KTRs at least 12 months post-transplantation with stable renal graft function for at least 3 months. The maintenance treatment consisted of MMF in combination with tacrolimus with or without steroids. At the end of the two treatment periods, 6-h or 12-h PK studies of mycophenolic acid (MPA) were performed. A total of 43 patients (mean age: 50.7 ± 13.5 years; 19 females, 24 males) were randomized. Estimates of test to reference ratios (90% CIs) were 0.959 (0.899; 1.023) h*μg/ml for AUC((0-tau)) and 0.873 (0.787; 0.968) μg/ml for C(max). Estimates for AUC((0-6h)) were 0.923 (0.865; 0.984) h*μg/ml and 0.985 (0.877; 1.106) μg/ml for C(min). Thus, AUC((0-tau)), AUC((0-6h)), and C(min) of MPA were within the predefined margins. C(max) was somewhat outside of these margins in this set of patients. The numbers and types of adverse events were not different between the two treatments. The steady-state pharmacokinetics of MPA as well as adverse events are comparable for Myfenax(®) and CellCept(®) in tacrolimus-treated stable KTRs.

Pharmacokinetic variability of mycophenolic acid and its glucuronide in systemic lupus erythematosus patients in remission maintenance phase

The aim of this study was to identify factors affecting the pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid (MPA) and its 7-O-glucuronide (MPAG) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. Thirty-one SLE patients in remission maintenance phase treated with mycophenolate mofetil (median 1500 mg/d) and prednisolone and followed-up for up to 56 months (median 13 months) were enrolled. Creatinine clearance and metal medication were significant predictors accounting for interindividual variability in the dose-normalized predose plasma concentration (C₀) of MPA (adjusted R²=0.305, p=0.01) in a multivariate analysis. Dose-normalized MPAG C₀ was significantly correlated with only creatinine clearance (adjusted R²=0.135, p=0.03). The free fraction of MPA was significantly correlated with only serum albumin (adjusted R²=0.700, p<0.01). The free fraction of MPAG was significantly correlated with serum albumin, metal medication, and age (adjusted R²=0.598, p=0.02). In conclusion, renal function and co-administered metal influenced the pharmacokinetics of MPA and MPAG in SLE patients in remission maintenance phase.

Lack of an Effect of Oral Iron Administration on Mycophenolic Acid Pharmacokinetics in Stable Renal Transplant Recipients

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To determine if coadministration of polysaccharide iron complex and slow-release ferrous sulfate alter the absorption of mycophenolic acid (MPA), and to examine the potential influence of dosing relative to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) administration and the effect of immediate- versus sustained-release iron products on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of MPA.

DESIGN

Prospective, open-label, three-phase, crossover, steady-state pharmacokinetic study.

SETTING

National Institutes of Health-sponsored General Clinical Research Center at a university medical center.

PATIENTS

Twelve adult (mean age 50 yrs) renal transplant recipients who were receiving concomitant iron and MMF maintenance therapy.

INTERVENTION

Oral iron therapy was coadministered with MMF on days -6-0, MMF was administered alone on days 1-8 (control phase), then oral iron therapy was administered 2 hours after MMF administration on days 9-16.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Baseline demographics, concurrent drug regimens, and clinical laboratory values were assessed. Blood samples were obtained at baseline and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours after MMF administration on days 0, 8, and 16. The MPA levels were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. We found no significant differences in the dose-standardized area under the concentration-time curve from 0-12 hours (AUC(0-12)) for MPA between the control phase (39.66 +/- 8.70 mg mg x hr/L) and the concomitant ferrous sulfate or dose-separated ferrous sulfate (37.56 +/- 9.95 or 32.84 +/- 8.43 mg x hr/L, respectively, p>0.05) phases. Dose-standardized AUC(0-12) values for MPA did not significantly differ after the concomitant administration of polysaccharide iron complex from that of the control phase (48.46 +/- 9.68 and 43.80 +/- 9.46 mg x hr/L, respectively, p=0.065). However, the AUC(0-12) for MPA significantly increased when polysaccharide iron complex was administered 2 hours after MMF (53.41 +/- 11.75 mg x hr/L, p=0.012). Maximum concentrations and times to reach maximum concentrations remained consistent across all study phases in each arm of the trial (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Multiple doses of iron therapy-slow-release ferrous sulfate, or polysaccharide iron complex-did not significantly reduce systemic exposure to MMF, as measured by using AUC(0-12) values.

Individualization of mycophenolate mofetil dose in renal transplant recipients

The immunosuppressive agent mycophenolate mofetil has been successfully used over the past 10 years to prevent acute allograft rejection after renal transplantation. It has mainly been administered as a fixed dose of mycophenolate mofetil 1000 mg b.i.d. The pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid, the active moiety of the prodrug mycophenolate mofetil, show large between-patient variability, and exposure to mycophenolic acid correlates with the risk for acute rejection. This suggests that already excellent clinical results can be further improved by mycophenolate mofetil dose individualization. This review discusses different arguments in favour of individualization of mycophenolate mofetil dose, as well as strategies for managing mycophenolate mofetil therapy individualization, including pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic monitoring and dose individualization based on pharmacogenetic information. It is expected that pharmacokinetic monitoring of mycophenolic acid will offer the most effective and feasible tool for mycophenolate mofetil dose individualization.

Absence of an interaction between iron and mycophenolate mofetil absorption

AIM

To determine whether concomitant iron affects the absorption of mycophenolate mofetil.

METHODS

An open-label, single centre, randomized, crossover trial was conducted in 16 healthy males. Fasting subjects received mycophenolate mofetil alone (treatment A) or co-administered with iron (treatment B).

RESULTS

The mycophenolic acid AUC(0,24 h) for treatments A and B were 42.5 +/- 10.5 and 44.7 +/- 12.4 microg ml(-1) h, respectively. anova modelling showed the relative bioavailability of mycophenolate mofetil to be similar for the two treatments (90% confidence interval 0.92, 1.19).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no interaction between mycophenolate mofetil and iron supplements administered concomitantly to healthy fasting subjects.

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mycophenolate in solid organ transplant recipients

This review aims to provide an extensive overview of the literature on the clinical pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate in solid organ transplantation and a briefer summary of current pharmacodynamic information. Strategies are suggested for further optimisation of mycophenolate therapy and areas where additional research is warranted are highlighted. Mycophenolate has gained widespread acceptance as the antimetabolite immunosuppressant of choice in organ transplant regimens. Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is the active drug moiety. Currently, two mycophenolate compounds are available, mycophenolate mofetil and enteric-coated (EC) mycophenolate sodium. MPA is a potent, selective and reversible inhibitor of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), leading to eventual arrest of T- and B-lymphocyte proliferation. Mycophenolate mofetil and EC-mycophenolate sodium are essentially completely hydrolysed to MPA by esterases in the gut wall, blood, liver and tissue. Oral bioavailability of MPA, subsequent to mycophenolate mofetil administration, ranges from 80.7% to 94%. EC-mycophenolate sodium has an absolute bioavailability of MPA of approximately 72%. MPA binds 97-99% to serum albumin in patients with normal renal and liver function. It is metabolised in the liver, gastrointestinal tract and kidney by uridine diphosphate gluconosyltransferases (UGTs). 7-O-MPA-glucuronide (MPAG) is the major metabolite of MPA. MPAG is usually present in the plasma at 20- to 100-fold higher concentrations than MPA, but it is not pharmacologically active. At least three minor metabolites are also formed, of which an acyl-glucuronide has pharmacological potency comparable to MPA. MPAG is excreted into the urine via active tubular secretion and into the bile by multi-drug resistance protein 2 (MRP-2). MPAG is de-conjugated back to MPA by gut bacteria and then reabsorbed in the colon. Mycophenolate mofetil and EC-mycophenolate sodium display linear pharmacokinetics. Following mycophenolate mofetil administration, MPA maximum concentration usually occurs in 1-2 hours. EC-mycophenolate sodium exhibits a median lag time in absorption of MPA from 0.25 to 1.25 hours. A secondary peak in the concentration-time profile of MPA, due to enterohepatic recirculation, often appears 6-12 hours after dosing. This contributes approximately 40% to the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC). The mean elimination half-life of MPA ranges from 9 to 17 hours. MPA displays large between- and within-subject pharmacokinetic variability. Dose-normalised MPA AUC can vary more than 10-fold. Total MPA concentrations should be interpreted with caution in patients with severe renal impairment, liver disease and hypoalbuminaemia. In such individuals, MPA and MPAG plasma protein binding may be altered, changing the fraction of free MPA available. Apparent oral clearance (CL/F) of total MPA appears to increase in proportion to the increased free fraction, with a reduction in total MPA AUC. However, there may be little change in the MPA free concentration. Ciclosporin inhibits biliary excretion of MPAG by MRP-2, reducing enterohepatic recirculation of MPA. Exposure to MPA when mycophenolate mofetil is given in combination with ciclosporin is approximately 30-40% lower than when given alone or with tacrolimus or sirolimus. High dosages of corticosteroids may induce expression of UGT, reducing exposure to MPA. Other co-medications can interfere with the absorption, enterohepatic recycling and metabolism of mycophenolate. Most pharmacokinetic investigations of MPA have involved mycophenolate mofetil rather than EC-mycophenolate sodium therapy. In population pharmacokinetic studies, MPA CL/F in adults ranges from 14.1 to 34.9 L/h (ciclosporin co-therapy) and from 11.9 to 25.4 L/h (tacrolimus co-therapy). Patient bodyweight, serum albumin concentration and immunosuppressant co-therapy have a significant influence on CL/F. The majority of pharmacodynamic data on MPA have been obtained in patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil therapy in the first year after kidney transplantation. Low MPA AUC is associated with increased incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection. Gastrointestinal adverse events may be dose related. Leukopenia and anaemia have been associated with high MPA AUC, trough concentration and metabolite concentrations in some, but not all, studies. High free MPA exposure has been identified as a risk factor for leukopenia in some investigations. Targeting a total MPA AUC from 0 to 12 hours (AUC12) of 30-60 mg.hr/L is likely to minimise the risk of acute rejection and may reduce toxicity. IMPDH monitoring is in the early experimental stage. Individualisation of mycophenolate therapy should lead to improved patient outcomes. MPA AUC12 appears to be the most useful exposure measure for such individualisation. Limited sampling strategies and Bayesian forecasting are practical means of estimating MPA AUC12 without full concentration-time profiling. Target concentration intervention may be particularly useful in the first few months post-transplant and prior to major changes in anti-rejection therapy. In patients with impaired renal or hepatic function or hypoalbuminaemia, free drug measurement could be valuable in further interpretation of MPA exposure.

Iron therapy for renal anemia: how much needed, how much harmful?

Iron deficiency is the most common cause of hyporesponsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Iron deficiency can easily be corrected by intravenous iron administration, which is more effective than oral iron supplementation, at least in adult patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Iron status can be monitored by different parameters such as ferritin, transferrin saturation, percentage of hypochromic red blood cells, and/or the reticulocyte hemoglobin content, but an increased erythropoietic response to iron supplementation is the most widely accepted reference standard of iron-deficient erythropoiesis. Parenteral iron therapy is not without acute and chronic adverse events. While provocative animal and in vitro studies suggest induction of inflammation, oxidative stress, and kidney damage by available parenteral iron preparations, several recent clinical studies showed the opposite effects as long as intravenous iron was adequately dosed. Thus, within the recommended international guidelines, parenteral iron administration is safe. Intravenous iron therapy should be withheld during acute infection but not during inflammation. The integration of ESA and intravenous iron therapy into anemia management allowed attainment of target hemoglobin values in the majority of pediatric and adult CKD and ESRD patients.

Mycophenolate mofetil in organ transplantation: focus on metabolism, safety and tolerability

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) received its first approval for the prevention of renal allograft rejection in 1995 and has now become the most frequently used antiproliferative agent in maintenance immunosuppressive therapy for kidney, pancreas, liver and heart transplantation. In addition, its use for the treatment of autoimmune diseases steadily increases. This review focuses on the miscellaneous pharmacodynamic properties of the drug, its pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects, recipients of different organ transplants and combination therapy with other pharmaceuticals, as well as its safety profile. The immunosuppressive activity of MMF is thought to derive mainly from the potent and selective inhibition of purine synthesis in both T and B lymphocytes. In contrast to other immunosuppressants on the market, it is metabolised primarily by glucuronidation and lacks nephrotoxicity, cardiovascular toxicity or diabetogenic potential, thus making it a suitable candidate for combination regimens. The most important side effects under MMF include gastrointestinal disorders, of which the underlying mechanisms are not yet fully understood, but seem to be complex and related to both effects of mycophenolic acid and its acyl glucuronide, as well as to decreased -immunity due to general immunosuppression after transplantation.

Anemia in the kidney-transplant patient

Anemia, a potentially correctable cardiovascular risk factor, continues to be a major problem in kidney-transplant patients. Erythropoietin levels increase rapidly after successful kidney transplantation, and by 3 months, most patients achieve hemoglobin levels greater than 12 g/dL. Anemia may be caused by problems commonly seen in the general population such as iron deficiency or gastrointestinal blood loss, by immunosuppressive medications, or by more rare abnormalities such as hemolytic uremic syndrome or parvovirus B19-induced aplastic anemia. Iron deficiency is common at the time of transplantation and beyond and frequently contributes to anemia. Markers of iron deficiency (ferritin or transferrin saturation) are frequently inconclusive because of the presence of inflammation and infection. Immunosuppressive medications, such as azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), are a common cause of mild bone-marrow suppression and, thus, anemia. Sirolimus can cause more severe bone-marrow suppression, although this effect can lessen over time. The transplant patient with chronic kidney disease (CKD) frequently develops anemia, yet agents such as epoetin-alpha and darbepoetin are greatly underutilized. Evaluation of anemia should be undertaken when hemoglobin fails to normalize by 3 months after transplantation. Later after transplantation, especially in the setting of chronic allograft dysfunction, evaluation should take place when the hemoglobin falls to less than 11 g/dL in premenopausal females or to less than 12 g/dL in males and postmenopausal females.

Anaemia after renal transplantation

Anaemia is a frequent complication among long-term renal transplant recipients. A prevalence of approximately 40% has been reported in several studies. If renal function declines to stage 5 kidney disease, the prevalence of anaemia in kidney transplants is even higher. A positive correlation between haemoglobin concentration and creatinine clearance has been reported, which is a function of endogenous erythropoietin production by the functioning graft. Inflammation related to a retained kidney graft may cause hypo-responsiveness to erythropoietic agents once kidney transplant recipients return to dialysis. Furthermore, the use of azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus may be associated with post-transplant anaemia. Along with erythropoietin deficiency, depletion of iron stores is one of the major reasons for anaemia in the kidney transplant population. The proportion of hypochromic red blood cells appears to be a useful parameter to measure iron supply and utilization as well as to estimate mortality risks in kidney transplant recipients. While anaemia is an important cardiovascular risk-factor after transplantation, our data suggest that anaemia is not associated with mortality and graft loss. Nevertheless, inadequate attention is paid so far to the management of anaemia after renal transplantation. A promising future aspect for risk reduction of cardiovascular disease includes the effect of erythropoietic agents on endothelial progenitor cells.