Prescription Patterns of Pharmacological Agents for Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction Among Hemodialysis Patients

Patterns of medication use and the burden of polypharmacy in patients with chronic kidney disease: the German Chronic Kidney Disease study

Background

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) bear a substantial burden of comorbidities leading to the prescription of multiple drugs and a risk of polypharmacy. However, data on medication use in this population are scarce.

Methods

A total of 5217 adults with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) between 30 and 60 mL/min/1.73 m² or an eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73m² and overt proteinuria (>500 mg/day) were studied. Self-reported data on current medication use were assessed at baseline (2010-12) and after 4 years of follow-up (FU). Prevalence and risk factors associated with polypharmacy (defined as the regular use of five or more drugs per day) as well as initiation or termination of polypharmacy were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression.

Results

The prevalence of polypharmacy at baseline and FU was almost 80%, ranging from 62% in patients with CKD Stage G1 to 86% in those with CKD Stage G3b. The median number of different medications taken per day was eight (range 0-27). β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and statins were most frequently used. Increasing CKD G stage, age and body mass index, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease and a history of smoking were significantly associated with both the prevalence of polypharmacy and its maintenance during FU. Diabetes mellitus was also significantly associated with the initiation of polypharmacy [odds ratio (OR) 2.46, (95% confidence interval 1.36-4.45); P = 0.003].

Conclusion

Medication burden in CKD patients is high. Further research appears warranted to address the implications of polypharmacy, risks of drug interactions and strategies for risk reduction in this vulnerable patient population.

Cardiorenal Interactions Revisited: How to Improve Heart Failure Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

To summarize current advances in the understanding and management of heart failure (HF) in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD).

RECENT FINDINGS

Diagnosis of HF and treatment of congestion are crucial in the management of patients with advanced CKD to reduce symptoms, preserve organ function, and improve outcomes. Echocardiography and cardiovascular biomarkers may help to differentiate cardiac from non-cardiac components of overhydration. Renal replacement therapy or ultrafiltration may be required to treat congestion. Furthermore, patients with advanced CKD are frequently undertreated with disease-modifying HF therapies, but the use of beta-blockers and ACEi should be considered under close monitoring of kidney function and serum potassium. The use of the new oral potassium binders may translate into improved outcomes. The treatment of HF in patients with advanced CKD requires a multi-disciplinary approach. New diagnostic and therapeutic strategies are under evaluation and may contribute to improved outcomes.

Lower Prescription Rates in Centenarians with Heart Failure and Heart Failure and Kidney Disease Combined: Findings from a Longitudinal Cohort Study of Very Old Patients

BACKGROUND

Centenarians are considered as models of successful aging and represent a special group of patients. The aim of this study was to analyze heart failure epidemiology and treatment trajectories in centenarians compared to nonagenarians (90-99 years of age) and octogenarians (80-89 years of age) with heart failure and with heart failure and kidney disease combined.

METHODS

This cohort study used quarterly structured routine data from 1398 German insurants over 6 years prior to death (398 centenarians were compared with 500 nonagenarians and 500 octogenarians). Of those, 525 individuals were diagnosed with heart failure before death; 164 had heart failure and kidney disease combined. Generalized estimation equations were used to assess the association of diagnoses of heart failure and other diseases with medication prescriptions.

RESULTS

Across age groups, heart failure was significantly more prevalent in centenarians compared with octogenarians and nonagenarians. Prevalence of heart failure increased over time. Female sex [odds ratio (men) = 0.70, p = 0.024], kidney disease (odds ratio = 1.31, p < 0.001), and hypertension (odds ratio = 1.52, p < 0.001) were all associated with heart failure. Overall, heart failure treatment changed significantly over time with an increased prescription rate of loop diuretics and a decreased rate of renin-angiotensin-system inhibitors. Centenarians were significantly less likely to receive treatment with renin-angiotensin-system inhibitors, loop diuretics, or beta-blockers compared with nonagenarians and octogenarians. Furthermore, aldosterone inhibitors were seldom prescribed; If-channel and neprilysin inhibitors were not routinely used in our sample. For those with heart failure and kidney disease combined, our data revealed that the prevalence of kidney disease was lower in centenarians than in younger patients before death. However, differences in prescription rates across age groups were non-significant, although numerically large. Finally, half of the patients in all three age groups with heart failure and kidney disease received treatment with renin-angiotensin-system inhibitors; about two out of five patients received beta-blockers, while prescription rates of aldosterone inhibitors were low.

CONCLUSIONS

While heart failure prevalence shows a continuous increase with age, prescription rates are lower in centenarians, emphasizing the need for further studies considering the quality of care and outcomes in this patient population. Disease management programs and trials are needed to develop guidelines that address the medically challenging treatment for very old patients with comorbid heart failure and kidney disease.

DOPPS data suggest a possible survival benefit of renin angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and other antihypertensive medications for hemodialysis patients

The benefits of renin angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) are well-established in the general population, particularly among those with diabetes, congestive heart failure (CHF), or coronary artery disease (CAD). However, conflicting evidence from trials and concerns about hyperkalemia limit RAASi use in hemodialysis patients, relative to other antihypertensive agents, including beta blockers and calcium channel blockers. Therefore, we investigated prescription patterns and associations with mortality for RAASi and other antihypertensive agents using data from the international Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Cox regression was used to estimate the effect of the prescription of RAASi and other antihypertensive agents at study entry on mortality in 11,421 incident (120 days or less) hemodialysis and 37,124 prevalent (over 120 days) hemodialysis patients from DOPPS phases 2-5 (2002-2015). Over 95% of RAASi were angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers. RAASi prevalence was 39% and varied minimally by CHF and CAD. The adjusted hazard ratio for RAASi (vs. no RAASi) was 0.89 (95% confidence interval 0.80-0.99) among incident and 0.94 (0.90-0.99) among prevalent hemodialysis patients, with no convincing evidence of interaction with diabetes, CAD or CHF. Inverse associations with mortality were also observed for beta blockers and calcium channel blockers, and were stronger for angiotensin receptor blockers than angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, but this latter finding requires further study. Thus, our observations suggest a relatively small survival benefit of RAASi and other antihypertensive agents in hemodialysis patients, though randomized prospective studies are needed to potentially change prescribing criteria.

Heart failure in patients with kidney disease

Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), and the population of CKD patients with concurrent HF continues to grow. The accurate diagnosis of HF is challenging in patients with CKD in part due to a lack of validated imaging and biomarkers specifically in this population. The pathophysiology between the heart and the kidneys is complex and bidirectional. Patients with CKD have greater prevalence of traditional HF risk factors as well as unique kidney-specific risk factors including malnutrition, acid-base alterations, uraemic toxins, bone mineral changes, anemia and myocardial stunning. These risk factors also contribute to the decline of kidney function seen in patients with subclinical and clinical HF. More targeted HF therapies may improve outcomes in patients with kidney disease as current HF therapies are underutilised in this population. Further work is also needed to develop novel HF therapies for the CKD population.

Medication-prescribing patterns of primary care physicians in chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

We investigated the medication-prescribing patterns of primary care physicians in chronic kidney disease (CKD).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 3,310 medical doctors who graduated from Jichi Medical University. The study instrument was a self-administered questionnaire to investigate their age group, specialty, workplace, existence of a dialysis center at workplace, and their prescription frequencies (high, moderate, low, very low) of the following agents--calcium (Ca) inhibitors, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin II receptor antagonist (ARBs), statins, anti-platelet agents, erythropoietin (Epo), AST-120, vitamin D, and sodium hydrogen carbonate (NaHCO(3)).

RESULTS

From a total of 933 responses, 547 (61.0 %) medical doctors prescribed medication for CKD. The prescription frequencies of Ca inhibitors, ACEIs, and ARBs were high (>90 %, high + moderate), those of statins, anti-platelet agents, Epo, and AST-120 were moderate (90-50 %, high + moderate), and those of vitamin D and NaHCO(3) were low (<50 %, high + moderate). The primary care physician's specialty was significantly associated with their prescription frequency of Ca inhibitors (p < 0.01). Their workplace was significantly associated with their prescription frequency of ACEIs (p < 0.01), ARBs (p < 0.01), Epo (p < 0.01) and vitamin D (p < 0.01). The existence of a dialysis center at their workplace was significantly associated with their prescription frequency of Epo (p < 0.01), vitamin D (p < 0.01) and NaHCO(3) (p < 0.01). Their age was not associated with their prescription frequency of any agents.

CONCLUSION

Antihypertensives were highly prescribed, and vitamin D and NaHCO(3) were less prescribed by primary care physicians for CKD. There were certain associations between the prescribing patterns of primary care physicians for CKD and their specialty, workplace and the existence of a dialysis center at their workplace.

Renin-angiotensin system blockade in heart failure patients on long-term haemodialysis in Taiwan

AIMS

Heart failure is among the most frequent complications of patients on long-term haemodialysis. The benefits of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade on the outcomes of these patients have yet to be determined.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a nationwide observational study using data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance claims database, between 1999 and 2010. We enrolled patients aged ≥35 years with new-onset heart failure [diagnosed by International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, clinical modification (ICD-9-CM) codes] under treatment with medications. New users of a RAS blocker (RASB; i.e., an ACE inhibitor or an ARB used as monotherapy or dual therapy) were selected to compare with non-RASB users. We used Cox proportional hazards regression with and without propensity score adjustment to compare the risk of 3-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Stratified analyses and RASB therapy duration as a time-dependent covariate were also performed. In all, 4771 were treated with an RASB (n = 3024) or without an RASB (n = 1747). RASB users had a higher prevalence of hypertension and diabetes, and a higher number of hospitalization. Among RASB users, 1148 deaths (38.0%) occurred during 5272 person-years of follow-up compared with 734 deaths (42.0%) among non-RASB users during 2683 person-years of follow-up. Three-year mortality rates were 45.4% and 49.1% for patients receiving and those not receiving an RASB, respectively (log-rank test, P < 0.001). Adjusted hazard analysis revealed that RASB therapeutic effects remained significant on all-cause [hazard ratio (HR) 0.8; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72-0.89; P < 0.001] and cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.64-0.90; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

RASB therapy reduced all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in heart failure patients on long-term haemodialysis.

Utilization and costs of cardiovascular disease medications in dialysis patients in Medicare Part D

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major source of mortality and morbidity in dialysis patients. Population-level descriptions of CVD medication use are lacking in this population.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Adult dialysis patients in the United States, alive on December 31, 2006, with Medicare Parts A and B and enrollment in Medicare Part D continuously in 2007.

PREDICTOR

CVDs and demographic characteristics.

OUTCOME

≥1 prescription fill during follow-up (2007).

MEASUREMENTS

Average out-of-pocket costs per user per month and average total drug costs per member per month were calculated.

RESULTS

Of 225,635 dialysis patients who met inclusion criteria during the entry period, 70% (n = 158,702) had continuous Part D coverage during follow-up. Of these, 76% received the low-income subsidy. β-Blockers were the most commonly used CVD medication (64%), followed by renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (52%), calcium channel blockers (51%), lipid-lowering agents (44%), and α-agonists (23%). Use varied by demographics, geographic region, and low-income subsidy status. For CVD medications, mean out-of-pocket costs per user per month were $3.44 and $49.59 and mean total costs per member per month were $124.02 and $110.32 for patients with and without the low-income subsidy, respectively.

LIMITATIONS

Information was available for only filled prescriptions under the Part D benefit; information for clinical contraindications was lacking, information for over-the-counter medications was unavailable, and medication adherence and persistence were not examined.

CONCLUSIONS

Most Medicare dialysis patients in 2007 were enrolled in Part D, and most enrollees received the low-income subsidy. β-Blockers were the most used CVD medication. Total costs of CVD medications were modestly higher for low-income subsidy patients, but out-of-pocket costs were much higher for patients not receiving the subsidy. Further study is warranted to delineate sources of variation in the use and costs of CVD medications across subgroups.

Epidemiology of cardiorenal syndrome

The interdependence of cardiac and renal dysfunction has emerged as a focus of intense interest in heart failure management due to the substantial associated morbidity and mortality. Captured in the clinical entity known as cardiorenal syndrome, recent definitions afford discussion of the acute and longitudinal evaluation and management of these patients. This article discusses potential pathophysiologic mechanisms of cardiorenal syndrome, epidemiology, inpatient and long-term care (including investigational therapies and mechanical fluid removal), and end-of-life and palliative care.

Treatment of heart failure in long-term dialysis patients: a reappraisal

Heart failure is one of the most frequent cardiac complications in patients with end-stage renal disease receiving long-term hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis and is associated strongly with a poor prognosis. Despite the significant morbidity and mortality associated with heart failure, there are very limited therapeutic options proved to prevent and treat heart failure in dialysis patients. This limitation largely reflects the paucity of adequately powered prospective randomized clinical trials that have examined the efficacy of different therapeutic options in long-term dialysis patients with heart failure. In this article, the second in a series discussing the management of heart failure in dialysis patients, current therapeutic options for heart failure in the maintenance dialysis population are reviewed and potential novel therapeutic options are discussed.

Epidemiology of cardiorenal syndrome

The interdependence of cardiac and renal dysfunction has emerged as a focus of intense interest in heart failure management due to the substantial associated morbidity and mortality. Captured in the clinical entity known as cardiorenal syndrome, recent definitions afford discussion of the acute and longitudinal evaluation and management of these patients. This article discusses potential pathophysiologic mechanisms of cardiorenal syndrome, epidemiology, inpatient and long-term care (including investigational therapies and mechanical fluid removal), and end-of-life and palliative care.

Cardiac function in an African dialysis population with a low prevalence of pre-existing cardiovascular disease

Cardiac dysfunction is highly prevalent in dialysis patients in the developed world, and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. The relative impact of pre-existing cardiac disease and dialysis/uremia on cardiovascular morbidity are not clear. We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of cardiac function and mortality in 202 incident and prevalent dialysis patients over an 18-month period in a population with a low prevalence of cardiovascular disease at dialysis initiation. Systolic dysfunction was defined as an ejection fraction (EF) of <50%. Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) was determined by echocardiography or electrocardiogram. Clinical data was collected by chart review. Ninety-nine percent of patients were black, with a mean age of 41.7 +/- 10.1 years, and median follow up 28 months (range 1-216 months). Echocardiograms were available in 132 patients. Seventy-seven patients received hemodialysis, and 55 received peritoneal dialysis. Mean EF was 63.2 +/- 11.1. EF was not lower in patients with greater duration of dialysis, although LVH tended to increase (not statistically significant). In 39 patients who died during the study period, cardiac function was not different from survivors, and no patient died of ischemic heart disease or heart failure. In conclusion, in a population of patients with a low prevalence of cardiovascular disease at dialysis initiation, cardiac function appears preserved over time, and cardiac morbidity and mortality are low. This finding suggests that dialysis and uremia per se, in the absence of pre-existing cardiac disease, may not be major contributors to cardiovascular morbidity.

Prescription of antihypertensive agents to haemodialysis patients: time trends and associations with patient characteristics, country and survival in the DOPPS

BACKGROUND

Haemodialysis patients were studied in 12 countries to identify practice patterns of prescription of antihypertensive agents (AHA) associated with survival.

METHODS

The sample included 28 513 patients enrolled in DOPPS I and II. The classes of AHA studied were beta blocker (BB), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), peripheral blocker, central antagonist, vasodilator, long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (CCB), short-acting dihydropyridine CCB and non-dihydropyridine CCB. To reduce bias due to unmeasured confounders, the associations with mortality were assessed by separate Cox models based on patient-level prescription and facility prescription practice.

RESULTS

An increase in prescription of ARBs (9.5%) and BBs (9.1%) was observed from DOPPS I to II. Prescription of AHA classes varied significantly by country, ranging for BBs from 9.7% in Japan to 52.7% in Sweden and for ARBs from 5.5% in Italy to 21.3% in Japan in DOPPS II. Facilities that treated 10% more patients with ARBs had, on average, 7% lower all-cause mortality, independent of patient characteristics and the prescription patterns of other antihypertensive medications (P = 0.05). Significant and independent associations with reduction in cardiovascular mortality were observed for ARBs (RR = 0.79; P = 0.005) and BBs (RR = 0.87, P = 0.004) in analyses of patient-level prescriptions. These associations in the facility-level model followed the same direction.

CONCLUSIONS

DOPPS data show large variations across countries in AHA prescription for haemodialysis patients. The data suggest an association between ARB use and reduction in all-cause mortality, as well as with the use of BBs and reduction in cardiovascular mortality among haemodialysis patients.

Cardiorenal syndrome

The term cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) increasingly has been used without a consistent or well-accepted definition. To include the vast array of interrelated derangements, and to stress the bidirectional nature of heart-kidney interactions, we present a new classification of the CRS with 5 subtypes that reflect the pathophysiology, the time-frame, and the nature of concomitant cardiac and renal dysfunction. CRS can be generally defined as a pathophysiologic disorder of the heart and kidneys whereby acute or chronic dysfunction of 1 organ may induce acute or chronic dysfunction of the other. Type 1 CRS reflects an abrupt worsening of cardiac function (e.g., acute cardiogenic shock or decompensated congestive heart failure) leading to acute kidney injury. Type 2 CRS comprises chronic abnormalities in cardiac function (e.g., chronic congestive heart failure) causing progressive chronic kidney disease. Type 3 CRS consists of an abrupt worsening of renal function (e.g., acute kidney ischemia or glomerulonephritis) causing acute cardiac dysfunction (e.g., heart failure, arrhythmia, ischemia). Type 4 CRS describes a state of chronic kidney disease (e.g., chronic glomerular disease) contributing to decreased cardiac function, cardiac hypertrophy, and/or increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events. Type 5 CRS reflects a systemic condition (e.g., sepsis) causing both cardiac and renal dysfunction. Biomarkers can contribute to an early diagnosis of CRS and to a timely therapeutic intervention. The use of this classification can help physicians characterize groups of patients, provides the rationale for specific management strategies, and allows the design of future clinical trials with more accurate selection and stratification of the population under investigation.

Inadequate Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure in Dialysis Patients

Congestive heart failure (CHF) is highly prevalent in patients on renal replacement therapy and is a leading cause of death in such patients. Several studies suggest that therapeutic agents for the treatment of CHF, particularly angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers, are underused in end-stage renal disease patients with CHF. Although limited data are available, growing evidence suggests that therapeutic agents for CHF improve survival and are safe to use, assuming close monitoring of adverse events. The reluctance of physicians in prescribing these therapeutic agents and the reasons underlying the inconsistent use of these agents in the dialysis population need to be addressed.