Complex Compartmental Behavior of Small Water-Soluble Uremic Retention Solutes: Evaluation by Direct Measurements in Plasma and Erythrocytes

Strategies for optimizing urea removal to enable portable kidney dialysis: A reappraisal

BACKGROUND

Portable hemodialysis has the potential to improve health outcomes and quality of life for patients with kidney failure at reduced costs. Urea removal, required for dialysate regeneration, is a central function of any existing/potential portable dialysis device. Urea in the spent dialysate coexists with non-urea uremic toxins, nutrients, and electrolytes, all of which will interfere with the urea removal efficiency, regardless of whether the underlying urea removal mechanism is based on urease conversion, direct urea adsorption, or oxidation. The aim of the current review is to identify the amount of the most prevalent chemicals being removed during a single dialysis session and evaluate the potential benefits of an urea-selective membrane for portable dialysis.

METHODS

We have performed a literature search using Web of Science and PubMed databases to find available articles reporting (or be able to calculate from blood plasma concentration) > 5 mg of individually quantified solutes removed during thrice-weekly hemodialysis sessions. If multiple reports of the same solute were available, the reported values were averaged, and the geometric mean of standard deviations was taken. Further critical literature analysis of reported dialysate regeneration methods was performed using Web of Science and PubMed databases.

RESULTS

On average, 46.0 g uremic retention solutes are removed in a single conventional dialysis session, out of which urea is only 23.6 g. For both urease- and sorbent-based urea removal mechanisms, amino acids, with 7.7 g removal per session, could potentially interfere with urea removal efficiency. Additionally for the oxidation-based urea removal system, plentiful nutrients such as glucose (24.0 g) will interfere with urea removal by competition. Using a nanofiltration membrane between dialysate and oxidation unit with a molecular weight cutoff (MWCO) of ~200 Da, 67.6 g of non-electrolyte species will be removed in a single dialysis session, out of which 44.0 g are non-urea molecules. If the membrane MWCO is further decreased to 120 Da, the mass of non-electrolyte non-urea species will drop to 9.3 g. Reverse osmosis membranes have been shown to be both effective at blocking the transport of non-urea species (creatinine for example with ~90% rejection ratio), and permissive for urea transport (~20% rejection ratio), making them a promising urea selective membrane to increase the efficiency of the oxidative urea removal system.

CONCLUSIONS

Compiled are quantified solute removal amounts greater than 5 mg per session during conventional hemodialysis treatments, to act as a guide for portable dialysis system design. Analysis shows that multiple chemical species in the dialysate interfere with all proposed portable urea removal systems. This suggests the need for an additional protective dialysate loop coupled to urea removal system and an urea-selective membrane.

Improving Clearance for Renal Replacement Therapy

The adequacy of hemodialysis is now assessed by measuring the removal of a single solute, urea. The urea clearance provided by current dialysis methods is a large fraction of the blood flow through the dialyzer, and, therefore, cannot be increased much further. However, other solutes, which are less effectively cleared than urea, may contribute more to the residual uremic illness suffered by patients on hemodialysis. Here, we review a variety of methods that could be used to increase the clearance of such nonurea solutes. New clinical studies will be required to test the extent to which increasing solute clearances improves patients' health.

Asymmetric dimethylarginine compartmental behavior during high-flux hemodialysis

AIM

The accumulation of uremic toxins, such as asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), has emerged as one of the major cardiovascular disease-related risk factors in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Based on the low molecular weight of ADMA, hemodialysis (HD) should theoretically effectively remove ADMA. In this study, we investigated the clearance behavior of ADMA during high-flux HD.

METHODS

Eight HD patients without residual renal function were included. Blood samples were collected at 0, 30, 60, 120 and 240 min after dialysis started, as well as 1 h and 48 h after dialysis. ADMA level was detected by HPLC-MS/MS. Herein, the ADMA level in blood cells and the ADMA protein binding rate were measured. Accordingly, the dialyzer extraction ratio was also determined.

RESULTS

The reduction ratio (RR) of ADMA (corrected for hemoconcentration) was significantly lower, at only 37.21 ± 6.44%, than that of urea and creatinine (p < .05). Interestingly, its clearance from plasma was precipitous early in dialysis and became slowly from 60 to 240 min. Additionally, a greater inlet erythrocyte than plasma concentration was found for ADMA. The dialyzer extraction ratio was comparable between ADMA and creatinine or urea (83 ± 5% for ADMA vs. 84 ± 3% and 88 ± 2% for creatinine and urea, respectively; both p>.05). Urea and creatinine had a slight rebound ratio of less than 10% at 1 h after the completion of HD. In contrast, considerable rebound of approximately 30% was detected in ADMA.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that ADMA may present a multicompartmental distribution that cannot be representatively reflected by the urea kinetics model.

Selective Transport of Protein-Bound Uremic Toxins in Erythrocytes

To better understand the kinetics of protein-bound uremic toxins (PBUTs) during hemodialysis (HD), we investigated the distribution of hippuric acid (HA), indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), indoxyl sulfate (IS), and p-cresyl sulfate (pCS) in erythrocytes of HD patients. Their transport across the erythrocyte membrane was explored in the absence of plasma proteins in vitro in a series of loading and unloading experiments of erythrocytes from healthy subjects and HD patients, respectively. Furthermore, the impact of three inhibitors of active transport proteins in erythrocytes was studied. The four PBUTs accumulated in erythrocytes from HD patients. From loading and unloading experiments, it was found that (i) the rate of transport was dependent on the studied PBUT and increased in the following sequence: HA < IS < pCS < IAA and (ii) the solute partition of intra- to extra-cellular concentrations was uneven at equilibrium. Finally, inhibiting especially Band 3 proteins affected the transport of HA (both in loading and unloading), and of IS and pCS (loading). By exploring erythrocyte transmembrane transport of PBUTs, their kinetics can be better understood, and new strategies to improve their dialytic removal can be developed.

A unidimensional diffusion model applied to uremic toxin kinetics in haemodiafiltration treatments

Kinetic modelling in haemodialysis is usually based upon the resolution of volume-defined compartment models. The interaction among these compartments is described by purely diffusive processes. In this paper we present an alternative kinetic model for uremic toxins in post-dilutional haemodiafiltration treatments by means of a unidimensional diffusion equation. A wide range of solutes such as urea, creatinine, $\beta _{2}$-microglobulin, myoglobin and prolactin were studied by imposing appropriate boundary and initial conditions in a virtual [0,1] domain. The diffusivity along the domain and the extraction rate at the dialyser are the kinetic parameters which were fitted by least-squares for every studied solute. The accuracy of the presented volumeless model as well as the behavior of the proposed kinetic parameters could be an alternative to the compartment description for a variety of molecular weight uremic toxins undergoing different treatment configurations.

A swan song for Kt/Vurea

Dialyzer clearance of urea multiplied by dialysis time and normalized for urea distribution volume (Kt/V_urea or simply Kt/V) has been used as an index of dialysis adequacy since more than 30 years. This article reviews the flaws of Kt/V, starting with a lack of proof of concept in three randomized controlled hard outcome trials (RCTs), and continuing with a long list of conditions where the concept of Kt/V was shown to be flawed. This information leaves little room for any conclusion other than that Kt/V, as an indicator of dialysis adequacy, is obsolete. The dialysis patient might benefit more if, instead, the nephrology community concentrates in the future on pursuing the optimal dialysis dose that conforms with adequate quality of life and on factors that are likely to affect outcomes more than Kt/V. These include residual renal function, volume status, dialysis length, ultrafiltration rate, the number of intra-dialytic hypotensive episodes, interdialytic blood pressure, serum potassium and phosphate, serum albumin, and C reactive protein.

HPLC Study of Uremic Fluids Related to Optical Dialysis Adequacy Monitoring

Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate uremia-related high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) ultraviolet (UV) absorbance profiles of serum and spent dialysate and to study the removal of uremic retention solutes in connection with optical dialysis adequacy monitoring.

Methods

10 uremic patients were investigated using online spectrophotometry at a wavelength of 280 nm over the course of 30 hemodialysis treatments. The dialysate and blood samples were taken and analyzed simultaneously using standard biochemical methods and reversed-phase HPLC. Filters with cutoff at 3 kDa and 70 kDa were used for the pre-treatment of the serum. The chromatographic peaks were detected by a UV detector at wavelengths of 254 and 280 nm.

Results

This study indicated that the main solute responsible for UV absorbance in the spent dialysate is a low-molecular-weight, water-soluble, non-protein-bound compound uric acid (UA). Three additional uremic retention solutes – creatinine (CR), indoxyl sulphate (IS) and hippuric acid (HA) – were identified from the HPLC profiles. The number of detected HPLC peaks was not significantly different for a serum filtered through the 3 kDa or 70 kDa cutoff filters, and was lower for the spent dialysate, indicating that the molecular weight (MW) of the main UV chromophores in the uremic fluids did not exceed 3 kDa. The reduction ratio (RR) estimated by the total area of HPLC peaks at 254 nm and 280 nm in the serum and by the online UV absorbance at 280 nm was best related to the removal of small water-soluble non-protein bound solutes like urea (UR), CR and UA.

Conclusions

The present study contributes new information on the removal of uremic retention solutes during hemodialysis and on the origin of the optical dialysis adequacy monitoring signal.

Biochemical and Clinical Impact of Organic Uremic Retention Solutes: A Comprehensive Update

In this narrative review, the biological/biochemical impact (toxicity) of a large array of known individual uremic retention solutes and groups of solutes is summarized. We classified these compounds along their physico-chemical characteristics as small water-soluble compounds or groups, protein bound compounds and middle molecules. All but one solute (glomerulopressin) affected at least one mechanism with the potential to contribute to the uremic syndrome. In general, several mechanisms were influenced for each individual solute or group of solutes, with some impacting up to 7 different biological systems of the 11 considered. The inflammatory, cardio-vascular and fibrogenic systems were those most frequently affected and they are one by one major actors in the high morbidity and mortality of CKD but also the mechanisms that have most frequently been studied. A scoring system was built with the intention to classify the reviewed compounds according to the experimental evidence of their toxicity (number of systems affected) and overall experimental and clinical evidence. Among the highest globally scoring solutes were 3 small water-soluble compounds [asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA); trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO); uric acid], 6 protein bound compounds or groups of protein bound compounds [advanced glycation end products (AGEs); p-cresyl sulfate; indoxyl sulfate; indole acetic acid; the kynurenines; phenyl acetic acid;] and 3 middle molecules [β₂-microglobulin; ghrelin; parathyroid hormone). In general, more experimental data were provided for the protein bound molecules but for almost half of them clinical evidence was missing in spite of robust experimental data. The picture emanating is one of a complex disorder, where multiple factors contribute to a multisystem complication profile, so that it seems of not much use to pursue a decrease of concentration of a single compound.

Measurement and Estimation of Residual Kidney Function in Patients on Dialysis

Residual kidney function (RKF) in patients on dialysis is strongly associated with survival and better quality of life. Assessment of kidney function underlies the management of patients with chronic kidney disease before dialysis initiation. However, methods to assess RKF after dialysis initiation are just now being refined. In this review, we discuss the definition of RKF and methods for measurement and estimation of RKF, highlighting the unique aspects of dialysis that impact these assessments.

A novel mathematical model of protein-bound uremic toxin kinetics during hemodialysis

Protein-bound uremic toxins (PBUTs) are difficult to remove by conventional hemodialysis; a high degree of protein binding reduces the free fraction of toxins and decreases their diffusion across dialyzer membranes. Mechanistic understanding of PBUT kinetics can open new avenues to improve their dialytic removal. We developed a comprehensive model of PBUT kinetics that comprises: (1) a three-compartment patient model, (2) a dialyzer model. The model accounts for dynamic equilibrium between protein, toxin, and the protein-toxin complex. Calibrated and validated using clinical and experimental data from the literature, the model predicts key aspects of PBUT kinetics, including the free and bound concentration profiles for PBUTs and the effects of dialysate flow rate and dialyzer size on PBUT removal. Model simulations suggest that an increase in dialysate flow rate improves the reduction ratio (and removal) of strongly protein-bound toxins, namely, indoxyl sulfate and p-cresyl sulfate, while for weakly bound toxins, namely, indole-3-acetic acid and p-cresyl glucuronide, an increase in blood flow rate is advantageous. With improved dialyzer performance, removal of strongly bound PBUTs improves gradually, but marginally. The proposed model can be used for optimizing the dialysis regimen and for in silico testing of novel approaches to enhance removal of PBUTs.

Protein-Bound Uremic Toxin Profiling as a Tool to Optimize Hemodialysis

Aim

We studied various hemodialysis strategies for the removal of protein-bound solutes, which are associated with cardiovascular damage.

Methods

This study included 10 patients on standard (3x4h/week) high-flux hemodialysis. Blood was collected at the dialyzer inlet and outlet at several time points during a midweek session. Total and free concentration of several protein-bound solutes was determined as well as urea concentration. Per solute, a two-compartment kinetic model was fitted to the measured concentrations, estimating plasmatic volume (V₁), total distribution volume (V_tot) and intercompartment clearance (K₂₁). This calibrated model was then used to calculate which hemodialysis strategy offers optimal removal. Our own in vivo data, with the strategy variables entered into the mathematical simulations, was then validated against independent data from two other clinical studies.

Results

Dialyzer clearance K, V₁ and V_tot correlated inversely with percentage of protein binding. All Ks were different from each other. Of all protein-bound solutes, K₂₁was 2.7–5.3 times lower than that of urea. Longer and/or more frequent dialysis that processed the same amount of blood per week as standard 3x4h dialysis at 300mL/min blood flow showed no difference in removal of strongly bound solutes. However, longer and/or more frequent dialysis strategies that processed more blood per week than standard dialysis were markedly more adequate. These conclusions were successfully validated.

Conclusion

When blood and dialysate flow per unit of time and type of hemodialyzer are kept the same, increasing the amount of processed blood per week by increasing frequency and/or duration of the sessions distinctly increases removal.

Future Avenues to Decrease Uremic Toxin Concentration

In this article, we review approaches for decreasing uremic solute concentrations in chronic kidney disease and in particular, in end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The rationale to do so is the straightforward relation between concentration and biological (toxic) effect for most toxins. The first section is devoted to extracorporeal strategies (kidney replacement therapy). In the context of high-flux hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration, we discuss increasing dialyzer blood and dialysate flows, frequent and/or extended dialysis, adsorption, bioartificial kidney, and changing physical conditions within the dialyzer (especially for protein-bound toxins). The next section focuses on the intestinal generation of uremic toxins, which in return is stimulated by uremic conditions. Therapeutic options are probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and intestinal sorbents. Current data are conflicting, and these issues need further study before useful therapeutic concepts are developed. The following section is devoted to preservation of (residual) kidney function. Although many therapeutic options may overlap with therapies provided before ESRD, we focus on specific aspects of ESRD treatment, such as the risks of too-strict blood pressure and glycemic regulation and hemodynamic changes during dialysis. Finally, some recommendations are given on how research might be organized with regard to uremic toxins and their effects, removal, and impact on outcomes of uremic patients.

The Role of Liver in Determining Serum Colon-Derived Uremic Solutes

Evidence has shown that indoxyl sulfate (IS) and p-cresyl sulfate (PCS) may be alternative predictors of clinical outcomes in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Both toxins are derived from the gastrointestinal tract and metabolised in the liver. However, it is unclear whether the liver affects the production of IS and PCS. Here, we explore the association between IS and PCS levels in liver cirrhosis and a CKD-based cohort (N = 115). Liver and kidney function was assessed and classified by a Child-Pugh score (child A–C) and a modified version of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation (Stages 1–4), respectively. An animal model was also used to confirm the two toxin levels in a case of liver fibrosis. In patients with early liver cirrhosis (child A), IS and PCS were significantly associated with CKD stages. In contrast, serum IS and PCS did not significantly change in advanced liver cirrhosis (child C). A stepwise multiple linear regression analysis also showed that T-PCS was significantly associated with stages of liver cirrhosis after adjusting for other confounding factors (B = -2.29, p = 0.012). Moreover, the serum and urine levels of T-PCS and T-IS were significantly lower in rats with liver failure than in those without (p<0.01, p<0.05 and p<0.01, p<0.05, respectively). These results indicated that in addition to the kidneys, the liver was an essential and independent organ in determining serum IS and PCS levels. The production rate of IS and PCS was lower in patients with advanced liver cirrhosis.

Dialyzer Reuse and Outcomes of High Flux Dialysis

Background

The bulk of randomized trial evidence for the expanding use of High Flux (HF) hemodialysis worldwide comes from two randomized controlled trials, one of which (HEMODIALYSIS, HEMO) allowed, while the other (Membrane Outcomes Permeability, MPO) excluded, the reuse of membranes. It is not known whether dialyzer reuse has a differential impact on outcomes with HF vs low flyx (LF) dialyzers.

Methods

Proportional Hazards Models and Joint Models for longitudinal measures and survival outcomes were used in HEMO to analyze the relationship between β2-microglobulin (β2M) concentration, flux, and reuse. Meta-analysis and regression techniques were used to synthesize the evidence for HF dialysis from HEMO and MPO.

Findings

In HEMO, minimally reused (< 6 times) HF dialyzers were associated with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.67 (95% confidence interval, 95%CI: 0.48–0.92, p = 0.015), 0.64 (95%CI: 0.44 – 0.95, p = 0.03), 0.61 (95%CI: 0.41 – 0.90, p = 0.012), 0.53 (95%CI: 0.28 – 1.02, p = 0.057) relative to minimally reused LF ones for all cause, cardiovascular, cardiac and infectious mortality respectively. These relationships reversed for extensively reused membranes (p for interaction between reuse and flux < 0.001, p = 0.005) for death from all cause and cardiovascular causes, while similar trends were noted for cardiac and infectious mortality (p of interaction between reuse and flux of 0.10 and 0.08 respectively). Reduction of β2M explained only 1/3 of the effect of minimally reused HF dialyzers on all cause mortality, while non-β2M related factors explained the apparent attenuation of the benefit with more extensively reused dialyzers. Meta-regression of HEMO and MPO estimated an adjusted HR of 0.63 (95% CI: 0.51–0.78) for non-reused HF dialyzers compared with non-reused LF membranes.

Conclusions

This secondary analysis and synthesis of two large hemodialysis trials supports the widespread use of HF dialyzers in clinical hemodialysis over the last decade. A mechanistic understanding of the effects of HF dialysis and the reuse process on dialyzers may suggest novel biomarkers for uremic toxicity and may accelerate membrane technology innovations that will improve patient outcomes.

Effect of cool vs. warm dialysate on toxin removal: rationale and study design

BACKGROUND

Cool dialysate is often recommended for prevention of intra-dialytic hypotensive episodes in maintenance hemodialysis (HD) patients. However, its effect on toxin removal is not studied. It is known that inter-compartmental resistance is the main barrier for toxin removal. Cool dialysate can potentially increase this resistance by vasoconstriction and thus impair the toxin removal. The aim of this trial is to compare the toxin removal outcome associated with cool vs. warm dialysate.

METHOD/DESIGN

This study is based on the hypothesis that dialysate temperature, a potential maneuver to maintain hemodynamic stability during HD, may influence inter-compartmental resistance and hence, toxin removal. Only stable HD patients will be recruited for this study. The quantum of removed toxins will be assessed by the total spent dialysate, which is a gold standard to quantify the efficacy of a single dialysis session. Collected samples will be analyzed for urea, creatinine, phosphate, β2-microglobulin, and uric acid. The study is a single center, self-controlled, randomized prospective clinical research where 20 study subjects will undergo 2 dialysis sessions: (a) cool dialysis with dialysate at 35.5°C, and (b) warm dialysis with dialysate at 37°C. Pre- and post-dialysis blood samples will be collected to quantify the dialysis adequacy and toxin reduction ratio.

DISCUSSION

This is the first clinical research to investigate the effect of dialysate temperature on removal of both small and large-sized toxins. Successful completion of this research will provide important knowledge pertaining to dialysate temperature prescription. Results can also lead to the hypothesis that cool dialysate may help in by preventing intra-dialytic hypotensive episodes, but prolonged prescription of cool dialysate may lead to comorbidities associated with excess toxin accumulation. The new knowledge will encourage for personalized dialysate temperature profiling.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier--NCT02064153.

Prominent accumulation in hemodialysis patients of solutes normally cleared by tubular secretion

Dialytic clearance of urea is efficient, but other small solutes normally secreted by the kidney may be cleared less efficiently. This study tested whether the high concentrations of these solutes in hemodialysis patients reflect a failure of passive diffusion methods to duplicate the efficacy of clearance by tubular secretion. We compared the plasma concentrations and clearance rates of four solutes normally cleared by tubular secretion with the plasma concentrations and clearance rates of urea and creatinine in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis and normal subjects. The predialysis concentrations (relative to normal subjects) of unbound phenylacetylglutamine (122-fold), hippurate (108-fold), indoxyl sulfate (116-fold), and p-cresol sulfate (41-fold) were much greater than the concentrations of urea (5-fold) and creatinine (13-fold). The dialytic clearance rates (relative to normal subjects) of unbound phenylacetylglutamine (0.37-fold), hippurate (0.16-fold), indoxyl sulfate (0.21-fold), and p-cresol sulfate (0.39-fold) were much lower than the rates of urea (4.2-fold) and creatinine (1.3-fold). Mathematical modeling showed that prominent accumulation of the normally secreted solutes in hemodialysis patients could be accounted for by lower dialytic clearance relative to physiologic clearance combined with the intermittency of treatment. Whether or not more efficient removal of normally secreted solutes improves outcomes in dialysis patients remains to be tested.

Does the adequacy parameter Kt/V(urea) reflect uremic toxin concentrations in hemodialysis patients?

Hemodialysis aims at removing uremic toxins thus decreasing their concentrations. The present study investigated whether Kt/V_urea, used as marker of dialysis adequacy, is correlated with these concentrations. Predialysis blood samples were taken before a midweek session in 71 chronic HD patients. Samples were analyzed by colorimetry, HPLC, or ELISA for a broad range of uremic solutes. Solute concentrations were divided into four groups according to quartiles of Kt/V_urea, and also of different other parameters with potential impact, such as age, body weight (BW), Protein equivalent of Nitrogen Appearance (PNA), Residual Renal Function (RRF), and dialysis vintage. Dichotomic concentration comparisons were performed for gender and Diabetes Mellitus (DM). Analysis of Variance in quartiles of Kt/V_urea did not show significant differences for any of the solute concentrations. For PNA, however, concentrations showed significant differences for urea (P<0.001), uric acid (UA), p-cresylsulfate (PCS), and free PCS (all P<0.01), and for creatinine (Crea) and hippuric acid (HA) (both P<0.05). For RRF, concentrations varied for β₂-microglobulin (P<0.001), HA, free HA, free indoxyl sulfate, and free indole acetic acid (all P<0.01), and for p-cresylglucuronide (PCG), 3-carboxy-4-methyl-5-propyl-2-furanpropionic acid (CMPF), free PCS, and free PCG (all P<0.05). Gender and body weight only showed differences for Crea and UA, while age, vintage, and diabetes mellitus only showed differences for one solute concentration (UA, UA, and free PCS, respectively). Multifactor analyses indicated a predominant association of concentration with protein intake and residual renal function. In conclusion, predialysis concentrations of uremic toxins seem to be dependent on protein equivalent of nitrogen appearance and residual renal function, and not on dialysis adequacy as assessed by Kt/V_urea. Efforts to control intestinal load of uremic toxin precursors by dietary or other interventions, and preserving RRF seem important approaches to decrease uremic solute concentration and by extension their toxicity.

Analytical solution of multicompartment solute kinetics for hemodialysis

Objective. To provide an exact solution for variable-volume multicompartment kinetic models with linear volume change, and to apply this solution to a 4-compartment diffusion-adjusted regional blood flow model for both urea and creatinine kinetics in hemodialysis. Methods. A matrix-based approach applicable to linear models encompassing any number of compartments is presented. The procedure requires the inversion of a square matrix and the computation of its eigenvalues λ, assuming they are all distinct. This novel approach bypasses the evaluation of the definite integral to solve the inhomogeneous ordinary differential equation. Results. For urea two out of four eigenvalues describing the changes of concentrations in time are about 10⁵ times larger than the other eigenvalues indicating that the 4-compartment model essentially reduces to the 2-compartment regional blood flow model. In case of creatinine, however, the distribution of eigenvalues is more balanced (a factor of 10² between the largest and the smallest eigenvalue) indicating that all four compartments contribute to creatinine kinetics in hemodialysis. Interpretation. Apart from providing an exact analytic solution for practical applications such as the identification of relevant model and treatment parameters, the matrix-based approach reveals characteristic details on model symmetry and complexity for different solutes.

Urea concentration and haemodialysis dose

Background. Dialysis dose is commonly defined as a clearance scaled to some measure of body size, but the toxicity of uraemic solutes is probably associated more to their concentrations than to their clearance. Methods. 619 dialysis sessions of 35 patients were modified by computer simulations targeting a constant urea clearance or a constant urea concentration. Results. Urea generation rate G varied widely in dialysis patients, rather independently of body size. Dialysing to eKt/V 1.2 in an unselected patient population resulted in great variations in time-averaged concentration (TAC) and average predialysis concentration (PAC) of urea (5.9–40.2 and 8.6–55.8 mmol/L, resp.). Dialysing to equal clearance targets scaled to urea distribution volume resulted in higher concentrations in women. Dialysing to the mean HEMO-equivalent TAC or PAC (17.7 and 25.4 mmol/L) required extremely short or long treatment times in about half of the sessions. Conclusions. The relation between G and V varies greatly and seems to be different in women and men. Dialysing to a constant urea concentration may result in unexpected concentrations of other uraemic toxins and is not recommended, but high concentrations may justify increasing the dose despite adequate eKt/V, std EKR, or std K/V.

Searching for uremic toxins

Treatment of uremia by hemodialysis has become widespread over the last 40 years and has improved substantially over that time. However, people treated with this modality continue to suffer from multiple disabilities. Retention of organic solutes, especially those poorly removed by hemodialysis, likely contributes to these disabilities. Certain classes of solutes are removed less well than urea by hemodialysis and by the normal kidney. These include protein-bound solutes, relatively large solutes, sequestered compounds, and substances removed at rates higher than urea by the normal kidney. Several strategies could be used to discover the solutes responsible for residual morbidities in standardly dialyzed people. Rather than continue to focus only on urea removal as an index for dialysis adequacy, finding additional approaches for removing toxic solutes with characteristics different from urea (and the similar small solutes it represents) is a desirable and feasible goal.

Chapter 7 Adequacy of haemodialysis in UK adult patients in 2010: national and centre-specific analyses

BACKGROUND

Outcome in patients treated with haemodialysis (HD) is influenced by the delivered dose of dialysis. The UK Renal Association (RA) publishes clinical practice guidelines which include recommendations for dialysis dose. The urea reduction ratio (URR) is a widely used measure of dialysis dose.

AIM

To determine the extent to which patients received the recommended dose of HD in the UK.

METHODS

All seventy-two UK renal centres submitted data to the UK Renal Registry (UKRR). Two groups of patients were included in the analyses: the prevalent patient population on 31st December 2010 and the incident patient population for 2010. Centres returning data on <50% of their patient population or centres with <20 patients were excluded from centre-specific comparisons.

RESULTS

Data regarding URR were available from 64 renal centres in the UK. Forty nine centres provided URR data on more than 90% of prevalent patients. The proportion of patients in the UK who met the UK clinical practice guideline for URR (>65%) increased from 56% in 1998 to 86% in 2010. There was persistent variation observed between centres, with 19 centres attaining the RA clinical practice guideline in >90% of patients and 39 centres attaining the guideline in 70-90%. The overall proportion of prevalent patients with a URR >65% has continued to improve over time.

CONCLUSIONS

The delivered dose of HD for patients with established renal failure has increased over the last decade. Whilst the majority of UK patients achieved the target URR there was considerable variation between centres in the percentage of patients achieving the guideline.

Erythrocyte glutathione transferase: a new biomarker for hemodialysis adequacy, overcoming the Kt/V(urea) dogma?

Kt/V_urea ratio is commonly used to assess the delivered dose of dialysis in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients. This parameter only reflects the efficacy of dialytic treatments in removing small toxins, but not middle and protein-bound toxins. Erythrocyte glutathione transferase (e-GST), an enzyme devoted to cell depuration against a lot of large and small toxins, is overexpressed in uremic patients. Aim of the present study is to verify whether e-GST may represent a novel biomarker to assess the adequacy of different dialytic techniques complementary to Kt/V_urea parameter. Furthermore, it will be investigated whether e-GST could reflect the ‘average' adequacy of multiple dialytic sessions and not of a single one treatment as it occurs for Kt/V_urea. One hundred and three MHD patients and 82 healthy subjects were tested. Fourty four patients were treated with standard bicarbonate hemodialysis (HD) and 59 patients were on online hemodiafiltration (HDF). In all MHD patients e-GST activity was 60% higher than in healthy controls. In HDF, e-GST activity was lower than in HD subgroup (8.2±0.4 versus 10.0±0.4 U/g_Hb, respectively). Single-pool Kt/V_urea and total weekly Kt/V_urea were higher in HDF than in HD, but no correlation was found between e-GST activity and Kt/V_urea data. e-GST, whose level is stable during the erythrocyte life-span, provides information on the long-term depurative efficacy of dialysis treatments.

In vitro Characterization of Oritavancin Clearance from Human Blood by Low-Flux, High-Flux, and Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Dialyzers

Background

Oritavancin is an investigational lipoglycopeptide antibiotic under clinical development for the treatment of gram-positive bacterial infections. The impact of hemodialysis on plasma concentrations of oritavancin is unknown and may be important in making dosage adjustments in such patients. The present study sought to determine the clearance of oritavancin from human blood by various commercially available dialyzers in an in vitro hemodialysis model.

Methods

Three types each of low-flux (Dicea 130, F6, and Polyflux 14L) and high-flux (Revaclear, Exeltra 150, and Optiflux F160NR) dialyzers and one type of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) dialyzer (Prismaflex M100) were studied. Heparinized human blood containing oritavancin (200 mg/L) was circulated from a reservoir to the dialyzers and back to the reservoir. Fresh dialysate was pumped through the dialyzers in a countercurrent manner. Blood samples from each side of the dialyzers and contaminated dialysate samples were collected at periodic intervals. Oritavancin levels were analyzed by a liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry method with a limit of quantification of 12.5 ng/mL and plasma clearances of oritavancin were calculated.

Results

The mean dialytic clearance of oritavancin was insignificant for each of the low-flux, high-flux and CRRT dialyzers. Clinically significant amounts of oritavancin were not detected in dialysate during any of the experimental dialysis sessions.

Conclusions

The clearance of oritavancin from human blood by the dialyzers used in this study is insignificant. Further clinical studies would be required before making changes in dosage of oritavancin in hemodialysis patients.

Dialysis cannot be dosed

Adequate dialysis is difficult to define because we have not identified the toxic solutes that contribute most to uremic illness. Dialysis prescriptions therefore cannot be adjusted to control the levels of these solutes. The current solution to this problem is to define an adequate dose of dialysis on the basis of fraction of urea removed from the body. This has provided a practical guide to treatment as the dialysis population has grown over the past 25 years. Indeed, a lower limit to Kt/V(urea) (or the related urea reduction ratio) is now established as a quality indicator by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid for chronic hemodialysis patients in the United States. For the present, this urea-based standard provides a useful tool to avoid grossly inadequate dialysis. Dialysis dosing, however, based on measurement of a single, relatively nontoxic solute can provide only a very limited guide toward improved treatment. Prescriptions which have similar effects on the index solute can have widely different effects on other solutes. The dose concept discourages attempts to increase the removal of such solutes independent of the index solute. The dose concept further assumes that important solutes are produced at a constant rate relative to body size, and discourages attempts to augment dialysis treatment by reducing solute production. Identification of toxic solutes would provide a more rational basis for the prescription of dialysis and ultimately for improved treatment of patients with renal failure.

UK Renal Registry 13th Annual Report (December 2010): Chapter 8: adequacy of haemodialysis in UK adult patients in 2009: national and centre-specific analyses

BACKGROUND

Outcome in patients treated with haemodialysis (HD) is influenced by the delivered dose of dialysis. The UK Renal Association (RA) publishes Clinical Practice Guidelines which include recommendations for dialysis dose. The urea reduction ratio (URR) is a widely used measure of dialysis dose.

AIM

To determine the extent to which patients received the recommended dose of HD in the UK.

METHODS

All seventy-two UK renal centres submitted data to the UK Renal Registry (UKRR). Two groups of patients were included in the analyses: the prevalent patient population on 31st December 2009 and the incident patient population for 2009. Centres returning data on <50% of their patient population were excluded from centre-specific comparisons.

RESULTS

Data regarding URR were available from 63 renal centres in the UK. Fifty-one centres provided URR data on more than 90% of prevalent patients. The proportion of patients in the UK who met the UK Clinical Practice Guideline for URR (>65%) increased from 56% in 1998 to 85.5% in 2009. There was considerable variation between centres, with 19 centres attaining the RA clinical practice guideline in >90% of patients and 5 centres attaining the guideline in <70% of patients. The delivered HD dose (URR) was lower in patients who had just commenced dialysis treatment compared to patients who had survived longer on HD.

CONCLUSIONS

The delivered dose of HD for patients with established renal failure has increased over the last decade. Whilst the majority of UK patients achieved the target URR there was considerable variation between centres in the percentage of patients achieving the guideline.

Simulation-based sodium thiosulfate dosing strategies for the treatment of calciphylaxis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Calciphylaxis remains a poorly understood life-threatening disorder with limited therapeutic options. Sodium thiosulfate (STS) has reported efficacy, thought to be because solubilizing calcium deposits promote clearance by hemodialysis (HD). Lack of rigorous pharmacokinetic studies makes it problematic for determining proper STS dosing given the expanding range of dialysis prescriptions and intensities.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

The purpose of this study was to determine the dosing strategies for STS during different dialysis regimens. Given reported successes using an empiric 25 g, intravenous, 3 times per week after HD, simulations were performed to predict dosing guidelines for alternative, more or less intense dialysis to produce equivalent area under the curve drug exposure. The modeled prescriptions varied HD time from 12 to 40 h/wk over three to six sessions (Q(b) 200 to 400 ml/min, Q(d) 500 to 800 ml/min), and continuous venovenous hemodialysis at low flow rates (Q(b) 100 to 200 ml/min, Q(d) 35 to 50 ml/min), using high-flux polysulfone hemofilters.

RESULTS

Simulations showed a marked variation in STS doses depending on HD frequency and duration. Blood and dialysate flows have a less prominent effect. Assuming no residual renal function, HD prescription permutations caused the dose to vary from 72 to 245 g/wk (70-kg adult), and the simulations provide specific guidelines for clinicians.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the success reported for one STS dosing regimen and assuming area under the curve exposure of STS is proportional to its effect, pharmacokinetic simulations can be used to calculate the dose for alternative, higher or lower intensity dialysis regimens. These strategies are imperative to assure adequate treatment for this mortal disease, as well as to avoid toxicity from excess dosing.

Guanidino compounds as uremic (neuro)toxins

Neurological and vascular impairment are important sources of morbidity in patients with renal failure. A portion of patients still suffers from uremic encephalopathy or other signs of nervous system impairment. Several reports demonstrate increased incidence of cardiac infarction and cerebrovascular accidents in chronic renal failure patients, even in those otherwise adequately dialyzed. Epileptic and cognitive symptoms are among the most typical manifestations of uremic encephalopathy. Several guanidino compounds (GCs) may play an important role in the etiology of uremic encephalopathy. Four GCs appeared to be substantially increased as well in serum, cerebrospinal fluid, and brain of uremic patients. These compounds, "uremic" GCs, are creatinine, guanidine (G), guanidinosuccinic acid (GSA), and methylguanidine. All four compounds are experimental convulsants in concentrations similar to those found in uremic brain. We described a possible mechanism for the contribution of GCs to uremic hyperexcitability, referring to the in vitro effects of uremic GCs on inhibitory and excitatory amino acid receptors. It was demonstrated that the excitatory effects of uremic GCs on the central nervous system can be explained by the activation of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors by GSA, concomitant inhibition of gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptors by uremic GCs, and other depolarizing effects. These effects might also indicate the putative contribution of uremic GCs to the etiology of uremic encephalopathy. In this article, we review the uremic GCs with particular attention to their neurotoxicity. We elaborate in detail on the mechanisms of action of the neurotoxic uremic GCs and summarize the kinetics of these toxins.

Methylamine clearance by haemodialysis is low

BACKGROUND

Dialysis adequacy is currently judged by measures of urea clearance. However, urea is relatively non-toxic and has properties distinct from large classes of other retained solutes. In particular, intracellularly sequestered solutes are likely to behave differently than urea.

METHODS

We studied an example of this class, the aliphatic amine monomethylamine (MMA), in stable haemodialysis outpatients (n = 10) using an HPLC-based assay.

RESULTS

Mean MMA levels pre-dialysis in end-stage renal disease subjects were 76 +/- 15 microg/L compared to 32 +/- 4 microg/L in normal subjects (n = 10) (P < 0.001). Mean urea reduction was 62% while the reduction ratio for MMA was 43% (P < 0.01). MMA levels rebounded in the 1 hour post-dialytic period to 85% of baseline, whereas urea levels rebounded only to 47% of baseline. MMA had a much larger calculated volume of distribution compared to urea, consistent with intracellular sequestration. Measures of intra-red blood cell (RBC) MMA concentrations confirmed greater levels in RBCs than in plasma with a ratio of 4.9:1. Because of the intracellular sequestration of MMA, we calculated its clearance using that amount removed from whole blood. Clearances for urea averaged 222 +/- 41 ml/min and for MMA 121 +/- 14 ml/min, while plasma clearance for creatinine was 162 +/- 20 ml/min (P < 0.01, for all differences). Using in vitro dialysis, in the absence of RBCs, solute clearance rates were similar: 333 +/- 6, 313 +/- 8 and 326 +/- 4 ml/min for urea, creatinine and MMA, respectively. These findings suggest that the lower MMA clearance relative to creatinine in vivo is a result of MMA movement into RBCs within the dialyser blood path diminishing its removal by dialysis.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, we find that, in conventional haemodialysis, MMA is not cleared as efficiently as urea or creatinine and raise the possibility that RBCs may limit its dialysis not merely by failing to discharge it, but by further sequestering it as blood passes through the dialyser.

Considerations in the statistical analysis of hemodialysis patient survival

The association of hemodialysis dosage with patient survival is controversial. Here, we tested the hypothesis that methods for survival analysis may influence conclusions regarding dialysis dosage and mortality. We analyzed all-cause mortality by proportional hazards and accelerated failure time regression models in a cohort of incident hemodialysis patients who were followed for 9 yr. Both models identified age, race, heart failure, physical functioning, and comorbidity scores as important predictors of patient survival. Using proportional hazards, there was no statistically significant association between mortality and Kt/V (hazard ratio 0.72; 95% confidence interval 0.45 to 1.14). In contrast, using accelerated failure time models, each 0.1-U increment of Kt/V improved adjusted median patient survival by 3.50% (95% confidence interval 0.20 to 7.08%). Proportional hazard models also yielded less accurate estimates for median survival. These findings are consistent with an additive damage model for the survival of patients who are on hemodialysis. In this conceptual model, the assumptions of the proportional hazard model are violated, leading to underestimation of the importance of dialysis dosage. These results suggest that future studies of dialysis adequacy should consider this additive damage model when selecting methods for survival analysis. Accelerated failure time models may be useful adjuncts to the Cox model when studying outcomes of dialysis patients.

New insights into uremic toxicity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Our concept of uremia has expanded to encompass the illness patients begin to suffer as glomerular filtration rate declines long before the onset of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) not explained by known derangements in volume status or metabolic parameters. New insights into the accumulation of uremic toxins and the loss of function of hormones and enzymes provide important information on the etiology of uremia.

RECENT FINDINGS

New data are accumulating on the identity and toxicity of uremic toxins and the syndromes that encompass uremia. rho-Cresol sulfate and indoxyl sulfate are small, protein-bound molecules that are poorly cleared with dialysis. These molecules have been linked to cardiovascular disease and oxidative injury. Impaired immunity plays a central role in the morbidity of ESRD and may be both the result of uremic toxicity and a contributor to oxidative stress in ESRD. Uremic cachexia is an underrecognized uremic syndrome. New insights into disordered feeding circuits in ESRD may lead to novel therapies using hormone agonists.

SUMMARY

Mortality in ESRD remains unacceptably high. It is hoped that as knowledge emerges on the causes and consequences of uremia, we are embarking on an era not only of new insights but also new and effective treatments for patients with the ill effects of uremia.

Role of symmetric dimethylarginine in vascular damage by increasing ROS via store-operated calcium influx in monocytes

BACKGROUND

The guanidines asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), a marker of endothelial dysfunction, and its counterpart symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA), considered inert, are accumulated in chronic kidney disease (CKD). The present study evaluates their effect on monocyte function, since previous data demonstrated leukocyte activation by other guanidino compounds.

METHODS

The effect of ADMA and SDMA on reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in human whole blood at baseline and after N-formyl-methionine-leucine-phenylalanine (fMLP) stimulation was evaluated. By using the fluorescent probe Fluo3-AM, the role of changes in monocytic cytoplasmic calcium ([Ca2+]i) was studied. Thapsigargin, and removal followed by addition of extracellular Ca2+ (Ca2+(ex)), was used to investigate the contribution of store-operated Ca2+-channels (SOCs). SKF96365 was used as a selective inhibitor of the SOCs. A pharmacologic intervention with captopril, known to affect Ca2+ influx, was tested.

RESULTS

SDMA enhanced ROS production in fMLP-stimulated monocytes using heparinized blood, and this effect was abolished in EDTA-anticoagulated blood. In the presence of SDMA, an increased Ca2+ entry from the extracellular milieu resulted in an elevated amplitude of the peak [Ca2+]i change triggered by fMLP. None of these effects were seen with ADMA. Depletion of the intracellular stores with thapsigargin in the absence of Ca2+(ex), followed by re-addition of Ca2+(ex) triggered a significantly larger Ca2+ entry after SDMA treatment versus saline. This effect was prevented with SKF96365, as was the SDMA-enhanced oxidative burst after fMLP. Pre-incubation with captopril also reduced the increased ROS production seen with SDMA.

CONCLUSIONS

SDMA, a uraemic retention solute considered inert, stimulates ROS production of monocytes by acting on Ca2+ entry via SOCs. This pro-inflammatory effect may trigger vascular pathology and may be involved in altering the prevalence of cardiovascular disease in CKD.