De Novo Heart Failure After Kidney Transplantation: Trends in Incidence and Outcomes

Long-term changes in cardiac remodelling in prevalent kidney graft recipients

BACKGROUND

Approximately 15% of kidney transplant (KT) recipients develop de novo heart failure after KT. There are scarce data reporting the long-term changes in cardiac structure and function among KT recipients. Despite the improvement in renal function, transplant-related complications as well as immunosuppressive therapy could have an impact on cardiac remodelling during follow-up. We aimed to describe the long-term changes in echocardiographic parameters in prevalent KT recipients and identify the clinical and laboratory factors associated with these changes.

METHODS

A centralised blinded review of two echocardiographic examinations after KT (on average after 17 and 39 months post-KT respectively) was performed among 80 patients (age 50.4 ± 16.2, diabetes 13.8% pre-KT), followed by linear regression to identify clinico-biological factors related to echocardiographic changes.

RESULTS

Left atrial volume index (LAVI) increased significantly (34.2 ± 10.8 mL/m2vs. 37.6 ± 15.0 mL/m2, annualised delta 3.1 ± 11.4 mL/m2/year; p = 0.034) while left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) decreased (62.1 ± 9.0% vs. 59.7 ± 9.9%, annualised delta -2.7 ± 13.6%/year; p = 0.04). Male sex (β = 8.112 ± 2.747; p < 0.01), pre-KT hypertension (β = 9.725 ± 4.156; p < 0.05), graft from expanded criteria donor (β = 3.791 ± 3.587; p < 0.05), and induction by anti-thymocyte globulin (β = 7.920 ± 2.974; p = 0.01) were associated with an increase in LAVI during follow-up. Higher haemoglobin (>12.9 g/dL) at the time of the first echocardiography (β = 6.029 ± 2.967; p < 0.05) and ACEi/ARB therapy (β = 8.306 ± 3.161; p < 0.05) were associated with an increase in LVEF during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the existence of long-term cardiac remodelling after KT despite dialysis cessation, characterised by an increase in LAVI and a decrease in LVEF. A better management of anaemia and using ACEi/ARB therapy may prevent such remodelling.

Arteriovenous fistula for haemodialysis as a predictor of de novo heart failure in kidney transplant recipients

Background

The haemodynamic effects of a functioning haemodialysis arteriovenous fistula (AVF) can cause or exacerbate heart failure (HF). We investigated whether the presence of an AVF at the time of kidney transplant (KT) is associated with de novo HF.

Methods

This was an observational cohort study including adult patients who received a KT in the West of Scotland between 2010 and 2020. We evaluated the risk and associations of pretransplant factors with de novo HF, alone and as a composite cardiovascular (CV) outcome (including non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, de novo HF and CV death). Multivariable proportional hazards regression and sensitivity analyses were used to identify independent correlates of the outcomes.

Results

Among 1330 included patients, the incident rate of de novo HF after transplantation was 58/1000 person-years [95% confidence interval (CI) 50-67] in AVF patients (n = 716) compared with 33/1000 person-years (95% CI 27-41) in non-AVF patients (n = 614). De novo HF was associated with the presence of an AVF [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 2.14 (95% CI 1.40-3.26)], duration of dialysis [aHR 1.03/year increase (95% CI 1.01-1.04)], age at transplant [aHR 1.03/year increase (95% CI 1.02-1.05)], female sex [aHR 1.93 (95% CI 1.40-2.65)] and pretransplant diabetes [aHR 2.43 (95% CI 1.48-4.01)]. The presence of an AVF was also associated with the composite CV outcome [aHR 1.91 (95% CI 1.31-2.78)].

Conclusions

The presence of an AVF may be an underrecognized modifiable predictor of de novo HF posttransplantation.

Kidney transplantation waiting times and risk of cardiovascular events and mortality: a retrospective observational cohort study in Taiwan

OBJECTIVES

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are at a high risk of cardiovascular events (CVEs), and kidney transplantation (KT) has been reported to improve risk of CVEs and survival. As the association of KT timing on long-term survival and clinical outcomes remains unclear, we investigated the association of different KT waiting times with clinical outcomes.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational cohort study.

SETTING

We conducted an observational cohort study using data from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. Adult patients who initiated KT therapy from 1997 to 2013 were included.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 3562 adult patients who initiated uncomplicated KT therapy were included and categorised into four groups according to KT waiting times after ESRD: group 1 (<1 year), group 2 (1-3 years), group 3 (3-6 years) and group 4 (>6 years).

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcomes were composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or non-fatal stroke, based on the primary diagnosis in medical records during hospitalisation.

RESULTS

Compared with group 1, the adjusted risk of primary outcome events (all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or non-fatal stroke) increased by 1.67 times in group 2 (95% CI: 1.40 to 2.00; p<0.001), 2.17 times in group 3 (95% CI: 1.73 to 2.71; p<0.001) and 3.10 times in group 4 (95% CI: 2.21 to 4.35; p<0.001). The rates of primary outcome events were 6.7%, 13.4% and 14.0% within 5 years, increasing to 19.5%, 26.3% and 30.8% within 10 years in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that early KT is associated with superior long-term cardiovascular outcomes compared with late KT in selected patients with ESRD receiving uncomplicated KT, suggesting that an early KT could be a better treatment option for patients with ESRD who are eligible for transplantation.

Cardiometabolic and Kidney Protection in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Diabetes: Mechanisms, Clinical Applications, and Summary of Clinical Trials

Kidney transplantation is the therapy of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease. Preexisting diabetes is highly prevalent in kidney transplant recipients (KTR), and the development of posttransplant diabetes is common because of a number of transplant-specific risk factors such as the use of diabetogenic immunosuppressive medications and posttransplant weight gain. The presence of pretransplant and posttransplant diabetes in KTR significantly and variably affect the risk of graft failure, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and death. Among the many available therapies for diabetes, there are little data to determine the glucose-lowering agent(s) of choice in KTR. Furthermore, despite the high burden of graft loss and CVD among KTR with diabetes, evidence for strategies offering cardiovascular and kidney protection is lacking. Recent accumulating evidence convincingly shows glucose-independent cardiorenal protective effects in non-KTR with glucose-lowering agents, such as sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. Therefore, our aim was to review cardiorenal protective strategies, including the evidence, mechanisms, and rationale for the use of these glucose-lowering agents in KTR with diabetes.

KDOQI US Commentary on the KDIGO 2020 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in CKD

In October 2020, KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) published its first clinical practice guideline directed specifically to the care of patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD). This commentary presents the views of the KDOQI (Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative) work group for diabetes in CKD, convened by the National Kidney Foundation to provide an independent expert perspective on the new guideline. The KDOQI work group believes that the KDIGO guideline takes a major step forward in clarifying glycemic targets and use of specific antihyperglycemic agents in diabetes and CKD. The purpose of this commentary is to carry forward the conversation regarding optimization of care for patients with diabetes and CKD. Recent developments for prevention of CKD progression and cardiovascular events in people with diabetes and CKD, particularly related to sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, have filled a longstanding gap in nephrology's approach to the care of persons with diabetes and CKD. The multifaceted benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors have facilitated interactions between nephrology, cardiology, endocrinology, and primary care, underscoring the need for innovative approaches to multidisciplinary care in these patients. We now have more interventions to slow kidney disease progression and prevent or delay kidney failure in patients with diabetes and kidney disease, but methods to streamline their implementation and overcome barriers in access to care, particularly cost, are essential to ensuring all patients may benefit.

Acute myocardial infarction and acute heart failure among renal transplant recipients: a national readmissions database study

BACKGROUND

The literature on the mortality and 30-day readmissions for acute heart failure and for acute myocardial infarction among renal-transplant recipients is limited.

OBJECTIVE

To study the in-hospital mortality, cardiovascular complications, and 30-day readmissions among renal transplant recipients (RTRs).

METHODS

Data from the national readmissions database sample, which constitutes 49.1% of all hospitals in the United States and represents more than 95% of the stratified national population, was analyzed for the years 2012-2018 using billing codes.

RESULTS

A total of 588,668 hospitalizations in renal transplant recipients (mean age 57.7 ± 14.2 years; 44.5% female) were recorded in the study years. A total of 15,788 (2.7%) patients had a diagnosis of acute heart failure; 11,320 (71.7%) had acute heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and 4468 (28.3%) had acute heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; 17,256 (3%) patients had myocardial infarction, 3496 (20%) had ST-Elevation myocardial infarction while 13,969 (80%) had non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Overall, 11,675 (2%) renal-transplant patients died, of whom 757 (6.5%) had acute heart failure, 330 (2.8%) had acute reduced and 427 (3.7%) had acute preserved ejection fraction failure. Among 1652 (14.1%) patient deaths with myocardial infarction, 465 (4%) were ST-elevation- and 1187 (10.1%) were non-ST-Elevation-related. The absolute yearly mortality rate due to acute heart failure increased over the years 2012-2018 (p-trend 0.0002, 0.001, 0.002, 0.05, respectively), while the mortality rate due to myocardial infarction with ST-elevation decreased (p-trend 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Cardiovascular complications are significantly associated with hospitalizations among RTRs. The absolute yearly mortality, and rate of heart failure (with reduced or preserved ejection fraction) increased over the study years, suggesting that more research is needed to improve the management of these patients.

Cardiovascular disease in the kidney transplant recipient: epidemiology, diagnosis and management strategies

Kidney transplantation (KT) is the optimal therapy for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), resulting in significant improvement in survival as well as quality of life when compared with maintenance dialysis. The burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in ESKD is reduced after KT; however, it still remains the leading cause of premature patient and allograft loss, as well as a source of significant morbidity and healthcare costs. All major phenotypes of CVD including coronary artery disease, heart failure, valvular heart disease, arrhythmias and pulmonary hypertension are represented in the KT recipient population. Pre-existing risk factors for CVD in the KT recipient are amplified by superimposed cardio-metabolic derangements after transplantation such as the metabolic effects of immunosuppressive regimens, obesity, posttransplant diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia and allograft dysfunction. This review summarizes the major risk factors for CVD in KT recipients and describes the individual phenotypes of overt CVD in this population. It highlights gaps in the existing literature to emphasize the need for future studies in those areas and optimize cardiovascular outcomes after KT. Finally, it outlines the need for a joint 'cardio-nephrology' clinical care model to ensure continuity, multidisciplinary collaboration and implementation of best clinical practices toward reducing CVD after KT.