Cancer in Patients With Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: A Nationwide Danish Cohort Study With Matched Controls

Transition of care in pediatric hereditary polyposis: the why, how and to whom

INTRODUCTION

Transition of care (TOC) is a process that must be planned and executed in a coordinated manner factoring patient, family, disease, and healthcare system. Among youth with gastrointestinal hereditary polyposis syndromes (HPS), poorly planned TOC can have devastating consequences from poor engagement in necessary medical care. This results in increased risk of cancer and related mortality. This review aims to emphasize unique aspects of HPS relevant to TOC, related barriers/challenges, and outline current best practice recommendations.

AREAS COVERED

A review was undertaken of transition-focused practice guidelines among youth with chronic conditions, as well as literature from major pediatric gastroenterology societies on the ideal approach for managing polyposis syndromes. Literature from PubMed and Medline, including conference abstracts and proceedings, was reviewed and in the absence of empirically supported evidence, recommendations reflect the opinion of the author experts involved in the care of adolescents and young adults (AYA) with HPS.

EXPERT OPINION

Effective TOC requires a structured, patient-centered, individualized process that includes early engagement, incremental education, and multidisciplinary collaboration. Given the unique aspects of HPS, including complex psychosocial and medical needs, there is urgent need for research toward evidence-based strategies enhancing continuity, and mitigating socio-cultural and financial barriers to care.

Pancreatic Cancer: Screening and Early Detection

Pancreatic cancer, often diagnosed at advanced stages, has poor survival rates. Effective screening aims to detect the disease early, improving outcomes. Current guidelines recommend screening high-risk groups, including those with a family history or genetic predispositions, using methods like endoscopic ultrasound and MRI. The American Gastroenterological Association and other organizations advise annual surveillance for high-risk individuals, typically starting at the age of 50 or 10 years younger than the youngest affected relative. For certain genetic syndromes, such as Peutz-Jeghers syndrome or hereditary pancreatitis, screening may begin as early as the age of 35 to 40 years.

The challenge of preventing gastric cancer in patients under surveillance for familial adenomatous polyposis

Several extra-colonic manifestations, including duodenal polyposis and desmoid tumors, are well-described manifestations in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). More recently, an increase in gastric cancer diagnoses has been observed in FAP. This case series presents nine patients with FAP who were diagnosed with gastric cancer at our FAP expertise center, of whom eight were diagnosed between 2017 and 2023, while before 2017 the only diagnosis of gastric cancer was in 2001. Among the nine cases of gastric cancer, seven were located in the proximal stomach amidst carpeting fundic gland polyposis and two were located in the distal stomach. Despite ongoing advances in endoscopic technology, all patients were diagnosed during regular endoscopic surveillance, and six of the nine patients died within two years. We aim to raise awareness on gastric cancer risk in FAP patients and stress the urgent need of improved gastric surveillance strategies with timely detection of gastric cancer precursors.

Endoscopic indicators in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis undergoing duodenal resections - a nationwide Danish cohort study with long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) predisposes individuals to duodenal adenomas. This study describes the histopathological features of endoscopic and surgical specimens from the duodenum, as well as genotype-phenotype associations.

METHODS

All known FAP patients were included from the Danish Polyposis Register. FAP patients were defined as having more than 100 cumulative colorectal adenomas and/or having a known germline pathogenic variant in the APC gene. Endoscopic procedures, histopathology, and genetics were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 500 FAP patients, 70.6% underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) at least once. Of these, 59.2% presented with detectable duodenal adenomas. The most severe morphology was tubular in 62.7% patients, tubulovillous in 25.4%, and villous in 12.0%, while the most severe dysplasia was low-grade in 67.5% patients, high-grade in 25.4%, and 6.7% had adenocarcinoma. In 6.2% of FAP patients, duodenal resection was recommended, including 29% with duodenal adenocarcinoma. The risk of duodenal surgery was 1.31 per 1,000 person-years (median age: 53 years). The predominant reason for surgery was extensive polyposis (67.7%). Of the patients who underwent duodenal resection, a median of six (IQR: 4-8) EGDs were performed within five years prior to surgery, but 67.6% and 83.9% never underwent a duodenal polypectomy or endoscopic mucosa resection, respectively. Of note, seventeen of 500 patients (3.4%) developed duodenal adenocarcinoma, of which 47% were advanced at diagnosis. Genetic evaluations revealed various pathogenic variants in the APC gene, with no strong genotype-phenotype association.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of duodenal adenomas and cancer in FAP warrants vigilant endoscopic surveillance. Nevertheless, the need for duodenal surgery persists and should together with endoscopic practice be monitored in national registers.

Progress report: Peutz-Jeghers syndrome

Peutz-Jeghers syndrome is a rare, autosomal dominant polyposis syndrome. Presenting with a remarkable phenotype including development of characteristic gastrointestinal polyps, mucocutaneous pigmentations, and an increased risk of cancer, the syndrome has been subject to many studies concerning the natural course of disease. In most patients, pathogenic germline variants are detected in the STK11 gene including cases of mosaicism and structural variants. Yet, studies assessing the effect of surveillance, understanding of cancer development, as well as clinical studies evaluating chemoprevention are lacking. In addition, the impact of Peutz-Jeghers syndrome on mental health, education, and family planning are insufficiently addressed. In this progress report, we describe current knowledge, clinical phenotype, surveillance strategies, and future areas of research.

Cancer Risks in Attenuated and Classical Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: A Nationwide Cohort With Matched, Nonexposed Individuals

INTRODUCTION

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is caused by pathogenic variants in the APC gene. FAP is usually categorized according to phenotype: classical FAP (CFAP) and attenuated FAP (AFAP); the latter is considered to have a milder disease course. We aimed to assess the risk of overall and specific cancers in patients with CFAP and AFAP compared with matched, nonexposed individuals.

METHODS

All known Danish patients with FAP were classified as either CFAP or AFAP and assigned 4 matched, nonexposed individuals. The risk of overall and specific cancers, and mortality were analyzed.

RESULTS

The analysis included 311 patients with CFAP, 134 patients with AFAP, and 1,600 nonexposed individuals. The overall cancer risk was significantly higher for both patients with CFAP and AFAP than for nonexposed individuals, with hazard ratios (HRs) of 4.77 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.61-6.32; P < 0.001) for CFAP and 3.22 (95% CI, 2.16-4.80; P < 0.001) for AFAP. No significant difference was observed when comparing CFAP and AFAP (HR = 1.48; 95% CI, 0.98-2.25; P = 0.0646). The HR of colonic cancer was 2.16 (95% CI, 0.99-7.72; P = 0.0522) and 2.72 (95% CI, 1.19-6.22; P = 0.0177 for CFAP and AFAP), respectively, compared with nonexposed and did not differ between patients with CFAP and AFAP (HR = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.32-2.00; P = 0.6278). Mortality was significantly higher in CFAP (HR = 2.96; 95% CI, 2.04-4.28; P < 0.001), but not in AFAP (HR = 1.40; 95% CI, 0.73-2.69; P = 0.311).

DISCUSSION

Nationwide data reveal differing risk profiles for specific cancers and mortality in AFAP and CFAP compared with nonexposed individuals. The cancer burden of AFAP necessitates consistent monitoring of these patients.

Advancements in Early Detection and Screening Strategies for Pancreatic Cancer: From Genetic Susceptibility to Novel Biomarkers

Pancreatic cancer is a rare but lethal cancer due to its biologically aggressive nature, advanced stage at the time of diagnosis, and poor response to oncologic therapies. The risk of pancreatic cancer is significantly higher to 5% in certain high-risk individuals with inherited genetic susceptibility. Screening for pancreatic cancer in these individuals from high-risk groups can help with the early detection of pancreatic cancer as well as the detection of precursor lesions leading to early surgical resection and improved overall outcomes. The advancements in radiological imaging as well as advanced endoscopic procedures has made a significant impact on the early diagnosis, surveillance, and staging of pancreatic cancer. There is also a significant advancement in the development of biomarkers for the early detection of pancreatic cancer, which has also led to the development of liquid biopsy, allowing for microRNA detection in serum and circulating tumor cells. Various societies and organizations have provided guidelines for pancreatic cancer screening and surveillance in high-risk individuals. In this review, we aim to discuss the hereditary risk factors for developing pancreatic cancer, summarize the screening recommendations by different societies, and discuss the development of novel biomarkers and areas for future research in pancreatic cancer screening for high-risk individuals.

Pancreatic Cancer: A Review of Risk Factors

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is one of the most lethal types of gastrointestinal cancer despite the latest medical advances. Its incidence has continuously increased in recent years in developed countries. The location of the pancreas can result in the initial symptoms of neoplasia being overlooked, which can lead to a delayed diagnosis and a subsequent reduction in the spectrum of available therapeutic options. The role of modifiable risk factors in pancreatic cancer has been extensively studied in recent years, with smoking and alcohol consumption identified as key contributors. However, the few screening programs that have been developed focus exclusively on genetic factors, without considering the potential impact of modifiable factors on disease occurrence. Thus, fully understanding and detecting the risk factors for pancreatic cancer represents an important step in the prevention and early diagnosis of this type of neoplasia. This review reports the available evidence on different risk factors and identifies the areas that could benefit the most from additional studies.

Gastrointestinal manifestations in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach (GAPPS): a systematic review with analysis of individual patient data

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach (GAPPS) is an autosomal dominant syndrome characterized by fundic gland polyps (FGP) as well as an increased risk of gastric cancer. The syndrome has been recognized as a clinical entity for less than a decade. A clinical suspicion may be complex and can vary from incidental findings of FGPs at gastroscopy to obstructive symptoms with dyspepsia and vomiting. The diagnosis is established by genetic detection of a pathogenic variant in the promotor 1B region of the APC gene. As of yet there are no established clinical criteria for the diagnosis. To increase knowledge of the condition and to discuss possible genetic testing and surveillance strategies, we performed a systematic review of all reported patients with GAPPS.

METHODS

This review was organized according to PRISMA guidelines. The search, which was conducted on September 7th, 2023, was applied to MEDLINE and restricted to only humans and papers in the English language. Only the studies on patients/families with GAPPS verified by identification of a pathogenic variant in the APC promoter 1B were included.

RESULTS

Twelve publications with a total of 113 patients were identified. In all instances the diagnosis was genetically verified with reports of four different variants within the APC promotor 1B region. Eighty-eight patients (90.1%) had gastric polyps, of these seven patients had low-grade dysplasia and five patients had both low- and high-grade dysplasia. Thirty-seven patients (45.7%) underwent gastrectomy. There were no reports of duodenal polyps (0%). Gastric cancer was found in 31 patients (30.1%) with a median age of 48 years (range 19-75). Twenty-six patients died (23.2%) of which 19 had developed gastric cancer (73.1%). One patient was diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer (2.2%) and died at 73 years of age. Nineteen patients had colorectal manifestations with < 20 polyps (41.3%).

CONCLUSION

Patients with a pathogenic variant in the APC promoter 1B region have an increased risk of gastric polyposis and early-onset gastric cancer. However, there is considerable variation in clinical expression and penetrance, which makes decisions on surveillance and the timing of prophylactic gastrectomy challenging.

Hereditary Gastrointestinal Tumor Syndromes: When Risk Comes with Your Genes

Despite recent campaigns for screening and the latest advances in cancer therapy and molecular biology, gastrointestinal (GI) neoplasms remain among the most frequent and lethal human tumors. Most GI neoplasms are sporadic, but there are some well-known familial syndromes associated with a significant risk of developing both benign and malignant GI tumors. Although some of these entities were described more than a century ago based on clinical grounds, the increasing molecular information obtained with high-throughput techniques has shed light on the pathogenesis of several of them. The vast amount of information gained from next-generation sequencing has led to the identification of some high-risk genetic variants, although others remain to be discovered. The opportunity for genetic assessment and counseling in these families has dramatically changed the management of these syndromes, though it has also resulted in significant psychological distress for the affected patients, especially those with indeterminate variants. Herein, we aim to summarize the most relevant hereditary cancer syndromes involving the stomach and colon, with an emphasis on new molecular findings, novel entities, and recent changes in the management of these patients.

Re-evaluating the genotypes of patients with adenomatous polyposis of unknown etiology: a nationwide study

In the Danish Polyposis Register, patients with over 100 cumulative colorectal adenomas of unknown genetic etiology, named in this study colorectal polyposis (CP), is registered and treated as familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). In this study, we performed genetic analyses, including whole genome sequencing (WGS), of all Danish patients registered with CP and estimated the detection rate of pathogenic variants (PV). We identified 231 families in the Polyposis Register, 31 of which had CP. A polyposis-associated gene panel was performed and, if negative, patients were offered WGS and screening for mosaicism in blood and/or adenomas. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was carried out for 27 of the families (four declined). PVs were detected in 11 families, and WGS revealed three additional structural variants in APC. Mosaicism of a PV in APC was detected in two families. As the variant detection rate of eligible families was 60%, 93% of families in the register now have a known genetic etiology.

Psychiatric and Educational Aspects of Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: A Nationwide Danish Cohort Study With Matched Nonexposed Individuals

INTRODUCTION

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is an autosomal, dominantly inherited disorder that predisposes to colorectal cancer. An increased risk of cancer may affect mental health, but the magnitude of this effect remains unknown. We assessed the psychosocial functioning, including the educational level attained and risk of psychiatric comorbidity, of patients with FAP by comparing them with matched nonexposed individuals.

METHODS

All Danish patients with FAP diagnosed before April 2021 were identified in the Danish Polyposis Register and paired with 4 matched nonexposed individuals. Educational history, psychiatric contacts or diagnoses ( International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision ), and treatment with antidepressants, anxiolytics, or antipsychotics were compared between patients with FAP and nonexposed individuals.

RESULTS

The analysis included 445 patients with FAP and 1,538 nonexposed individuals. The highest educational level reached was significantly lower for patients with FAP ( P < 0.001). When comparing patients with FAP and nonexposed and adjusting for a cancer diagnosis, an increased risk was observed for a psychiatric contact (1.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-2.29, P < 0.001), any psychiatric prescription (1.39, 95% CI 1.17-1.66, P < 0.001), a psychiatric diagnosis (1.64, 95% CI 1.19-2.26, P = 0.002), and experiencing any psychiatric event (hazard ratio 1.42, 95% CI 1.20-1.68, P < 0.001). An increased risk was specifically seen for mood (affective) disorders (1.76, 95% CI 1.09-2.83, P = 0.02) and behavioral and emotional disorders (2.01, 95% CI 1.10-3.69, P = 0.02) and the need for antidepressants (1.59, 95% CI 1.24-2.03, P < 0.001) and antipsychotics (1.85, 95% CI 1.26-2.70, P = 0.002).

DISCUSSION

Compared with nonexposed individuals, patients with had significantly less education and an increased risk of developing mood and behavioral disorders, with an increased likelihood of needing antidepressants and antipsychotics.

The Spigelman Staging System and the Risk of Duodenal and Papillary Cancer in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Individuals with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) have an almost 20% lifetime risk of duodenal adenocarcinoma, currently the leading cause of death in FAP. The Spigelman staging system provides guidance on the surveillance intervals and timing of prophylactic surgery. Still, its accuracy in predicting duodenal and papillary cancer development has not been systematically evaluated. We investigated the sensitivity and cancer risk of the Spigelman stages.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review on PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane and used a random-effects model to pool effect sizes.

RESULTS

After removing duplicate entries, we screened 1,170 records and included 27 studies for quantitative analysis. Once duodenal polyposis reaches Spigelman stage IV, the risk of duodenal and papillary cancers increased to 25% (95% confidence interval [CI] 12%-45%). However, the sensitivity of Spigelman stage IV for these cancers was low (51%, 95% CI 42%-60%), especially for papillary adenocarcinoma (39%, 95% CI 16%-68%). We investigated the reasons behind these low values and observed that duodenal cancer risk factors included polyps >10 mm, polyp count >20, and polyps with high-grade dysplasia. Risk factors associated with papillary cancer included a papilla with high-grade dysplasia or >10 mm. The evidence on other risk factors was inconclusive.

DISCUSSION

The current Spigelman staging system had a low sensitivity for duodenal and papillary adenocarcinomas. Two Spigelman variables (duodenal villous histology and polyp count) and the lack of papilla-specific variables likely contributed to the low sensitivity values for duodenal and papillary cancers, respectively. While clinicians may be familiar with its current form, there is an urgent need to update it.

[Hereditary and familial forms of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Genetic determinism, patients eligible for systematic screening, screening methods and results]

Systematic screening for pancreatic cancer in high risk individuals is justified by the poor prognosis of the majority of cases diagnosed at a symptomatic stage that are mostly advanced and unresectable Individual risk assessment is based on both genetic data and family history. The screening of a panel of susceptibiility genes should be offered to any affected individual when a genetic predisposition is suspected. An international consortium has proposed a definition of the at risk population, candidate for screening, and there is a consensus on the target lesions of this screening: early adenocarcinoma and benign lesions with a high potential for malignant transformation: Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neopasm (IPMN) and Pancreatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia (PanIN) with high-grade dysplasia. Its modalities currently consist of an annual pancreatic MRI and/or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), associated with screening for diabetes mellitus. The main limitation of screening, the effectiveness of which has not yet been demonstrated, is its lack of sensitivity, which results in a non-negligible rate of interval cancers and sometimes advanced diagnoses. Insufficient specificity is also imperfect, in particular with regard to benign lesions with a low potential for degeneration, and can lead to the proposal of unjustified surgeries. This situation makes the future integration of new imaging techniques and promising new biological approaches that are being explored highly desirable.

Association between Pancreatoblastoma and Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: Review of the Literature with an Additional Case

BACKGROUND

Adult pancreatoblastoma (PBL) is a rare pancreatic malignancy, with recent evidence suggesting a possible link to familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). This study aims to review the latest evidence and explore a possible association between adult PBL and FAP.

METHODS

Two independent literature reviews were conducted: (1) on PBL and FAP, and (2) on PBL in the adult population not diagnosed with FAP.

RESULTS

Out of 26 articles on PBL and FAP screened, 5 were selected for systematic review, including 1 additional case. We identified eight FAP-related PBL cases, with a median age of 40 (IQR: 34-50). Of these, seven (87%) occurred in adults. We found 65 cases of adult PBL not FAP-related; thus, 7 out of 65 cases (10.7%) of adult PBL reported in the literature are associated with a clinical diagnosis of FAP or were carriers of APC germline pathogenic variants (GPVs).

CONCLUSION

Data suggest a non-random association between adult PBL and FAP. Further research is essential to optimise surveillance protocols and develop more effective treatment strategies.