Colon Polyp Surveillance: Separating the Wheat From the Chaff

How Good Is Good Enough? What Should Be the Target for CRC Screening?

Colorectal Cancer (CRC) screening of average-risk individuals has been shown to reduce CRC mortality and incidence. Incidence is reduced by detection and removal of cancer precursor lesions (CPLs), resulting in cancer prevention. Mortality reduction is achieved with detection of curable CRC, as well as prevention by removing CPLs before cancer develops. Targets of screening include both curable CRC and CPLs. Non-invasive stool tests are a multi-step screening program which can detect curable cancers and less likely to detect CPLs than invasive screening. The non-invasive programs depend on completion of colonoscopy if the test is positive. Invasive screening with colonoscopy is a one-step test program, with excellent detection of both curable CRCs and CPLs, if performed with high-quality. Current evidence suggests that either program could be effective, despite different targets. Patient adherence and program quality are perhaps the important determinants of program effectiveness.

A New Blood-Based Epigenetic Diagnostic Biomarker Test (EpiSwitch®® NST) with High Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value for Colorectal Cancer and Precancerous Polyps

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Colorectal cancer (CRC) arises from the epithelial lining of the colon or rectum, often following a progression from benign adenomatous polyps to malignant carcinoma. Screening modalities such as colonoscopy, faecal immunochemical tests (FIT), and FIT-DNA are critical for early detection and prevention, but non-invasive methods lack sensitivity to polyps and early CRC. Chromosome conformations (CCs) are potent epigenetic regulators of gene expression. We have previously developed an epigenetic assay, EpiSwitch®®, that employs an algorithmic-based CCs analysis. Using EpiSwitch®® technology, we have shown the presence of cancer-specific CCs in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and primary tumours of patients with melanoma and prostate cancer. EpiSwitch®®-based commercial tests are now available to diagnose prostate cancer with 94% accuracy (PSE test) and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors across 14 cancers with 85% accuracy (CiRT test). Methods/Results/Conclusions: Using blood samples collected from n = 171 patients with CRC, n = 44 patients with colorectal polyps and n = 110 patients with a 'clear' colonoscopy we performed whole Genome DNA screening for CCs correlating to CRC diagnosis. Our findings suggest the presence of two eight-marker CC signatures (EpiSwitch®® NST) in whole blood that allow diagnosis of CRC and precancerous polyps, respectively. Independent validation cohort testing demonstrated high accuracy in identifying colorectal polyps and early versus late stages of CRC with an exceptionally high sensitivity of 79-90% and a high positive prediction value of 60-84%. Linking the top diagnostic CCs to nearby genes, we have built pathways maps that likely underline processes contributing to the pathology of polyp and CRC progression, including TGFβ, cMYC, Rho GTPase, ROS, TNFa/NFκB, and APC.

Influence of Lifestyles on Polyp Burden and Cancer Development in Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Syndromes

BACKGROUND

Whether the progression of precursor lesions or the occurrence of cancer is influenced by lifestyle factors in carriers of genetic mutations has not been fully investigated, especially in Asian patients of hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) syndrome.

METHODS

Patients at a high risk of hereditary CRC were included. For polyposis CRC syndromes, colorectal polyp burden was measured using at least 60 images per colonoscopy in each patient and classified into five stages using the International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours staging system according to the polyp number and size. Increase in tumor burden stage for polyposis CRC syndrome and the occurrence of CRC or any cancer for Lynch syndrome were analyzed according to lifestyle factors.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients with suspected hereditary polyposis CRC syndrome and 106 patients with Lynch syndrome were recruited. For polyposis CRC syndromes, multivariate analysis showed that exposure to smoking and > 100 polyps independently predicted a high risk of increased polyp burden (p = 0.008 and p = 0.012, respectively). Significant genetic mutations or phenotype of polyposis syndromes were significantly associated with an increased polyp burden. For Lynch syndrome, smokers showed to be diagnosed with CRC in younger age than never-smokers (42.2 years vs. 49.0 years; p = 0.021), and heavy drinkers had high risk for occurrence of CRC (HR, 2.381, 95% CI, 1.338-4.236; p = 0.003) and any cancer (HR, 2.254; 95% CI, 1.334-3.806; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The lifestyle factors (smoking and alcohol consumption) were associated with increasing precursor lesions and occurrence of cancer in patients with hereditary CRC syndrome. Lifestyle modifications may reduce the risk of hereditary CRC in carriers.

Fatty acid desaturase insertion-deletion polymorphism rs66698963 predicts colorectal polyp prevention by the n-3 fatty acid eicosapentaenoic acid: a secondary analysis of the seAFOod polyp prevention trial

BACKGROUND

A fatty acid desaturase (FADS) insertion-deletion (Indel) polymorphism (rs66698963) influences the expression of FADS1, which controls the synthesis of n-6 highly unsaturated fatty acid (HUFA) arachidonic acid (AA). The anti-inflammatory activity of the n-3 HUFA eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) may be explained by competition with AA for proinflammatory lipid mediator synthesis. A precision medicine approach based on stratification by FADS Indel genotype could identify individuals, who benefit from greatest disease risk reduction by n-3 HUFAs.

OBJECTIVES

We tested the hypothesis that the FADS insertion (I) allele predicts colorectal polyp risk reduction in a secondary analysis of the randomized, placebo-controlled, 2×2 factorial seAFOod polyp prevention trial of EPA 2000 mg daily and aspirin 300 mg daily for 12 mo (ISRCTN05926847).

METHODS

Participant Indel genotype was determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) blind to trial outcomes. Colorectal polyp outcomes were included in negative binomial (polyp number) and logistic (polyp detection rate [PDR; percentage with one or more polyps]) regression models comparing each active intervention with its placebo. Presence of ≥1 Indel I allele and an interaction term (I allele × active intervention) were covariates.

RESULTS

In 528 participants with colonoscopy and FADS Indel data, EPA use irrespective of Indel genotype, was not associated with reduced colorectal polyp number (incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 0.92; 95% confidence interval: 0.74, 1.16), mirroring original seAFOod trial analysis. However, the presence of ≥1 I allele identified EPA users with a significant reduction in colorectal polyp number (IRR: 0.50 [0.28, 0.90]), unlike aspirin, for which there was no interaction. Similar findings were obtained for the PDR.

CONCLUSIONS

The FADS Indel I allele identified individuals, who displayed colorectal polyp prevention by EPA with a similar effect size to aspirin. Assessment of rs66698963 as a biomarker of therapeutic response to n-3 HUFAs in other populations and healthcare settings is warranted. The seAFOod polyp prevention trial and STOP-ADENOMA study were registered at International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number registry as ISRCTN05926847.