Reduction of Morbidity With a Reverse-Flow Sural Flap: A Two-Stage Technique

Is it possible to perform reverse sural artery flap on lower limbs where the main trunk of the peroneal artery is interrupted?

As blood flow to the reverse sural artery flap (RSAF) occurs via the peroneal artery, the health of the peroneal artery is generally considered important. In severe limb injuries, the main trunk of the peroneal artery is often disrupted at the fracture site, which brings uncertainty in the use of RSAF. We hypothesized that RSAF could be used even in cases where the main trunk of the peroneal artery is interrupted if retrograde blood flow from the plantar side forms a communication network with the superficial sural artery. Therefore, we performed RSAF in cases where the blood flow of the communicating branch could be confirmed. This study included patients who underwent RSAF when the main trunk of the peroneal artery was interrupted by trauma. Patient demographics, characteristics of injury, and treatment course were obtained from medical records. The outcome of this study included flap survival and complications, such as partial necrosis or flap infection. Five limbs that underwent RSAF met the inclusion criteria. In all cases, the skin flaps survived and soft tissue reconstruction was completed. Infection and partial necrosis of the skin flaps were observed in 2 cases each. This study showed that the RSAF can be used, even in cases where the main trunk of the peroneal artery had been interrupted, if retrograde blood flow from the plantar side forms a communication network with the superficial sural artery.

Reliability of reverse sural artery fasciocutaneous flap in older adult patients: Comparison study between older and younger patients

BACKGROUND

The reverse sural artery fasciocutaneous (RSAF) flap is a popular option for patients with soft tissue defects of the distal lower extremities. However, most studies have focused on young patients without comorbidities. This study aimed to report the clinical application of the RSAF flap and to evaluate its reliability in older adult patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study of fifty-one patients who underwent RSAF flap was included in this study between September 2016 and October 2021. Reconstruction outcomes and wound complications were compared between groups A (21 patients over 60 years of age) and B (30 patients under 60 years of age).

RESULTS

Overall, 74.5% of the flaps healed primarily. The demographics of the two groups were similar, except for comorbidities (P = 0.01). The risk factors that affected the survival of RSAF flaps were not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05). The rate of wound complications in group A (42.85%) was significantly higher than that in group B (13.3%) (P = 0.04). However, all wound complications were treated using a simple procedure (skin grafting or simple suturing).

CONCLUSIONS

The RSAF flap can be a reliable salvage option to repair soft tissue defects of the lower extremities in older adult patients. It is safe and easy to harvest and transfer the flap; however, surgeons should be aware of the possibility of wound complications in older patients with comorbidities.

How Safe Is Reverse Sural Flap?: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue reconstruction of the lower third of the leg, the ankle, and the foot is challenging for reconstructive surgeons. The options for reconstruction are limited. Reverse sural flap is relatively easy to perform and considered a good option for reconstruction. The complication rates are variable in studies. This study aims to systemically review all available articles based on reverse sural flap focusing on complications of the flap. The overall complication of the flap helps to better understand the reliability of the flap.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar to identify cases of reverse sural artery flap.

RESULTS

A pooled analysis of 89 articles was performed, which yielded 2575 patients (2592 flaps) over a period of 19 years. Most of the cases were performed in Asian countries (1540 flaps, 59.4%) with the majority being performed in China (746 flaps, 28.8%). The most common cause for reverse sural flap surgery was trauma/postsurgical (1785/2592) followed by burn/scarring. Flap complications were recorded in 653 of 2592 flaps (25.20%). The most common complication was partial flap loss, which was recorded in 204 flaps (7.85%) followed by venous congestion (79 flaps, 3.05%). Complete flap loss was observed only in 66 participants (2.5% of all the flaps performed).

CONCLUSIONS

Reverse sural flap is reliable flap for the reconstruction of lower leg, ankle, and foot. It can give a comparable outcome as free flap when meticulously performed and, in many cases, a better result.

Reconstruction of Heel Soft Tissue Defects: An Algorithm Based on Our Experience

BACKGROUND

Sensory recovery and durability of the flap is the primary goal of heel soft tissue reconstruction. From the different options, the choice of the flap depends on the size of the defect, its location, and the availability of the donor area.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 40 patients having heel defects were included from Jan 2016 to Dec 2018 in which different flaps were used for the reconstruction. The outcome was evaluated in terms of flap survival, recovery of sensation, the durability of coverage, and functional denouement. We also analysed the outcome between neuropathic and non-neuropathic ulcers of the heel.

RESULTS

Out of 40 patients’ medial plantar artery islanded flap was performed in eight cases, extended reverse sural flap in 16 cases, islanded reverse sural flap in six cases, local flaps in six cases, cross-leg flap in two cases, and free Latissimus Dorsi muscle flaps with Skin Graft cover in two cases. The patients were observed for a mean follow-up time of 15 months (12-20 months). Only two flaps showed marginal necrosis as an immediate complication. The majority of the flaps were tenacious in the follow-up period except for the six flaps that developed delayed ulceration. Return of protective sensation (P=0.006) and mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society subjective score (P=0.025) was significantly higher in the non-neuropathic ulcer group.

CONCLUSION

Locoregional flaps can cover most of the heel defects with a satisfactory outcome. The functional outcome was lower in the reconstructed neuropathic heel ulcer group.

Resurfacing the donor sites of reverse sural artery flaps using thoracodorsal artery perforator flaps

Background

The reverse sural artery (RSA) flap is widely used for lower extremity reconstruction. However, patients sometimes suffer from donor site complications such as scar contracture and paresthesia, resulting in dissatisfaction with the aesthetic outcomes. This study investigated the characteristics of donor site morbidity associated with RSA flaps and described our experiences of dealing with complications by performing resurfacing surgery using thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) flaps.

Methods

From April 2008 to August 2018, a total of 11 patients underwent contracture release and resurfacing surgery using TDAP flaps due to donor morbidity associated with RSA flaps. All affected donor sites were covered with a skin graft, the most common of which was a meshed split-thickness skin graft (six cases).

Results

Eight of the 11 patients (72.7%) suffered from pain and discomfort due to scar contracture, and seven (63.6%) complained of a depression scar. The donor sites were located 6.3±4.1 cm below the knee joint, and their average size was 140.1 cm². After resurfacing using TDAP flaps, significant improvements were found in the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) scores and the active and passive ranges of motion (AROM and PROM) of the knee joint. The LEFS scores increased from 45.1 to 56.7 postoperatively (P=0.003), AROM increased from 108.2° to 118.6° (P=0.003), and PROM from 121.4° to 126.4° (P=0.021).

Conclusions

Planning of RSA flaps should take into account donor site morbidity. If complications occur at the donor site, resurfacing surgery using TDAP flaps achieves aesthetic and functional improvements.

Revisit of flap factors relating to partial necrosis of distally based sural flaps: an analysis of 435 cases in a single center

BACKGROUND

Partial necrosis is an ongoing topic in regard to flap complications of the distally based sural (DBS) flap However, the factors influencing partial necrosis of the flap remain in debate. The aim of the present study is to further illuminate the flap-related risk factors and the effects of several technical improvements.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 429 patients who underwent 435 DBS flaps between April 2001 and December 2019. The reconstruction outcomes, flap viability-related complications, and potential risk factors were compared between the survival group and partial necrosis group, as well as between group A (the procedures performed from April 2001 to March 2010) and group B (those from April 2010 to December 2019).

RESULTS

Among the 435 flaps, 39 flaps (8.97%) exhibited partial necrosis. With the increase of the top edge of the flap, the partial necrosis rate increased significantly (P < 0.05). When the length-to-width ratio [LWR] of the flap was more than 5:1 or the total length of the flap (the length of the skin island plus the length of the adipofascial pedicle) was more than 20 cm, the partial necrosis rate increased significantly (P < 0.05). The partial necrosis rate in group B (5.86%, 15/256) was significantly lower than that in group A (13.41%, 24/179) (P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

The top edge of the flap is an essential indicator for predicting the prognosis of the DBS flap. When the total length of the flap is more than 20 cm or the LWR of the flap more than 5:1, the partial necrosis rate will increase significantly. Various technical modifications can lower the top edge of the flap and reduce the LWR of the flap and width of the skin island, and thus improve the flap survival effectively.

[Clinical study of modified technique to reduce partial necrosis rate of distally pedicled sural flap]

Objective

To investigate whether the technical modifications regarding the risk factors related to the partial necrosis of the distally pedicled sural flap could reduce the partial necrosis rate of the flap.

Methods

A clinical data of 254 patients (256 sites) (modified group), who used modified technique to design and cut distally pedicled sural flaps to repair the distal soft tissue defects of the lower limbs between April 2010 and December 2019, was retrospectively analyzed. Between April 2001 and March 2010, 175 patients (179 sites) (control group) who used the traditional method to design and cut the skin flap to repair the distal soft tissue defects of the lower limbs were compared. Various technical modifications were used to lower the top-edge of the flap, reduce the length-width ratio (LWR) of the flap and width of the skin island. There was no significant difference in gender, age, etiology, duration from injury to operation, site and area of the soft tissue defect between groups ( P>0.05). The length and width of the skin island and adipofascial pedicle, the total length of the flap and LWR, and the pivot point position were measured and recorded. The top-edge of the flap was determined according to the division of 9 zones in the posterior aspect of the lower limb. The occurrence of partial necrosis of the flap and the success rate of defect reconstruction were observed postoperatively.

Results

There was no significant difference in the length and width of the skin island, the length of the adipofascial pedicle, total length and LWR of the flap, and pivot point position of the flap between groups ( P>0.05). The width of the adipofasical pedicle in modified group was significant higher than that in control group ( t=-2.019, P=0.044). The top-edge of 32 flaps (17.88%) in control group and 31 flaps (12.11%) in modified group were located at the 9th zone; the constituent ratio of the LWR more than 5∶1 in modified group (42.58%, 109/256) was higher than that in control group (42.46%, 76/179); and the constituent ratio of width of skin island more than 8 cm in control group (59.78%, 107/179) was higher than that in modified group (57.42%, 147/256). There was no significant difference in the above indicators between groups ( P>0.05). In control group, 155 flaps (86.59%) survived completely, 24 flaps (13.41%) exhibited partial necrosis. Among them, 21 wounds healed after symptomatic treatments, 3 cases were amputated. The success rate of defects reconstruction was 98.32% (176/179). In modified group, 241 flaps (94.14%) survived completely, 15 flaps (5.86%) exhibited partial necrosis. Among them, 14 wounds healed after symptomatic treatments, 1 case was amputated. The success rate of defect reconstruction was 99.61% (255/256). The partial necrosis rate in modified group was significantly lower than that in control group ( χ ²=7.354, P=0.007). There was no significant difference in the success rate between the two groups ( P=0.310). All patients in both groups were followed up 1 to 131 months (median, 9.5 months). All wounds in the donor and recipient sites healed well.

Conclusion

The partial necrosis rate of the distally based sural flap can be decreased effectively by applying personalized modified technical for specific patients.

The Need to Improve Patient-Centered Outcome Reporting Following Lower Extremity Flap Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

 Research in lower extremity (LE) wound management involving flap reconstruction has primarily focused on surgeon-driven metrics. There has been a paucity in research that evaluates patient-centered outcomes (PCO). This systematic review and meta-analysis examines articles published between 2012 and 2020 to assess whether reporting of functional and quality of life (QOL) outcomes have increased in frequency and cohesiveness, compared with the previous two decades.

METHODS

 PubMed and Ovid were queried with appropriate Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms for studies published between June 2012 and July 2020. For inclusion, each study had to report any outcome of any tissue transfer procedure to the LE in comorbid patients, including complication rates, ambulation rates, flap success rates, and/or QOL measures. The PCO reporting prevalence was compared with a previous systematic review by Economides et al which analyzed papers published between 1990 and June 2012, using a Pearson's Chi-squared test.

RESULTS

 The literature search yielded 40 articles for inclusion. The proportion of studies reporting PCO was greater for literature published between 1990 and 2012 compared with literature published between 2012 and 2020 (86.0 vs. 50.0%, p < 0.001). Functional outcomes were more commonly reported between 1990 and 2012 (78.0 vs. 47.5%, p = 0.003); similarly, ambulatory status was reported more often in the previous review (70.0 vs. 40.0%, p = 0.004). This study solely examined the rate at which PCO were reported in the literature; the individual importance and effect on medical outcomes of each PCO was not evaluated.

CONCLUSION

 Less than 50% of the literature report functional outcomes in comorbid patients undergoing LE flap reconstruction. Surprisingly, PCO reporting has seen a downward trend in the past 8 years relative to the preceding two decades. Standardized inclusion of PCO in research regarding this patient population should be established, especially as health care and governmental priorities shift toward patient-centered care.

The Reverse Sural Artery Flap: A Reliable and Versatile Flap for Wound Coverage of the Distal Lower Extremity and Hindfoot

The reverse sural artery flap is a distally based fasciocutaneous or adipofascial flap used for wound coverage of the distal one-third of the lower extremity, ankle, and posterior heel. The flap harvest can be performed without sacrificing major arteries of the lower extremity. It can be elevated and mobilized with relative ease and a short operative time. It provides a good alternative to free tissue transfer in complex lower-extremity wounds with exposed bone, tendon, or hardware. The surgeon must be familiar with the management of venous congestion to improve the success of the flap.

Repeated reverse sural fasciocutaneous flap is an effective surgical strategy for repairing long segmental soft tissue defects of the tibia

Objective

This study was performed to introduce our surgical strategy and experience in applying a repeated reverse sural fasciocutaneous flap (RSFF) to repair large areas of tibial exposure.

Methods

During a 3-year period, 10 patients with a large area of tibial exposure and intact posterior skin and soft tissue after trauma were treated in our hospital using a repeated RSFF. First, most of the area of proximal tibial exposure was covered by an RSFF. Three weeks later, another smaller RSFF was designed from the original flap and rotated to repair the remaining exposed area of the tibial wound.

Results

All 10 patients’ wounds were completely healed after 2 to 4 operations. The wounds had healed well after 6 months. The patients were satisfied in terms of both appearance and function.

Conclusion

The repeated RSFF is a good treatment strategy for patients with large areas of tibial exposure with intact posterior skin and soft tissue.

Two-staged reverse sural flap: a versatile flap with consistent results in the soft tissue reconstruction of distal leg and heel defects-an institutional experience

BACKGROUND

Reverse sural flap (RSF) is commonly used for soft tissue reconstruction of distal leg and heel defects. The classic method of flap transfer is the single-staged cutaneous islanded reverse sural flap (SS-RSF). This method is associated with variable flap complications notably the venous congestion. The other form of flap transfer is the two-stage reverse sural flap (TS-RSF), in which the pedicle of the flap is exteriorized in the first stage. Flap division and re-inset are done in the second stage. The aim of this paper is to review the flap outcomes and complications among the SS-RSF and TS-RSF reconstruction of soft tissue defects in the distal leg and heel.

METHODS

This is a retrospective chart review of RSF being operated in a tertiary care hospital. The duration of study was 1.5 years. Twelve RSFs (6 SS-RSF, 6 TS-RSF) were done for soft tissue defects in the distal leg and heel. Wounds of various etiologies (traumatic, chronic, non-healing ulcers) were reviewed. Trauma was the most common etiology with 8 out of 12 (66.7%) patients. Large wounds, donor site damage and patients with peripheral vascular disease were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

Five out of six (83.3%) of TS-RSF healed uneventfully. However, 3 out of 6 (50%) of SS-RSF had partial flap necrosis. All complicated flaps healed well subsequently. No donor site complication was found in any of our patients.

CONCLUSION

Pedicle exteriorization in TS-RSF eliminates the element of venous congestion and eventually flaps necrosis. Less technical expertise and minimal morbidity are additional advantages of TS-RSF.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Comparison of Reverse Sural Artery Flap Healing for Traumatic Injuries Above and Below the Ankle Joint

The reverse sural artery (RSA) flap is popular among trauma surgeons to cover the distal third of the leg to the foot. However, flaps that inset in the foot seem to have a high necrosis rate. This study compared the healing of RSA flaps performed for defects proximal to the ankle versus defects distal to the ankle. Patient data were collected retrospectively between January 2005 and December 2009. Eighty-five patients with the lower leg, ankle, and traumatic foot injuries were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 (49 patients) had RSA flap cover for soft tissue and bony defect proximal and up to the ankle joint line, and group 2 (36 patients) had RSA flap cover distal to the ankle joint line. The time to healing and type of healing were compared between the groups. The demographics between the 2 groups were similar. The successful RSA flap healing rate was 65% in group 1 (32 of 49) and 42% in group 2 (15 of 36). The average time to flap healing between the groups was similar (p = .16). Group 1 had predominantly primary healing compared with group 2 (p = .03). Group 2 had a higher reoperation rate for wound necrosis, which was significant (p = .001). The success of the RSA flap is higher when used for proximal to ankle joint line defects. Surgeons should be aware of the chances of flap necrosis when undertaking RSA flap cover distal to the ankle joint line.