Coagulation Tests and Bleeding Classification After Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Prospective Study

Assessing the Reliability of the Bleeding Assessment Scale in Critically Ill Children (BASIC) Definition: A Prospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

To determine the reliability of the Bleeding Assessment Scale in critically Ill Children (BASIC) definition of bleeding severity in a diverse cohort of critically ill children.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Eight mixed PICUs in the Netherlands, Israel, and the United States.

SUBJECTS

Children ages 0-18 years admitted to participating PICUs from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2022, with bleeding noted by bedside nurse.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The bleeding events were classified as minimal, moderate, or severe, according to the BASIC definition, by two independent physicians at two different time points. Patient demographic data, laboratory values, and clinical outcomes were collected. Three hundred twenty-eight patients were enrolled. The overall inter-rater reliability was substantial (weighted kappa coefficient, 0.736; 95% CI, 0.683-0.789), and the intra-rater reliability was "almost-perfect" (weighted kappa coefficient, 0.816; 95% CI, 0.769-0.863). The platelet count ( p = 0.008), prothrombin time ( p = 0.004), activated partial thromboplastin time ( p = 0.025), and fibrinogen levels ( p = 0.035) were associated with the bleeding severity, but the international normalized ratio was not ( p = 0.195). Patients were transfused blood components in response to any bleeding in 31% of cases and received hemostatic medications in 9% of cases. More severe bleeding was associated with increased 28-day mortality, longer hospital length of stay, and more days receiving inotropic support.

CONCLUSIONS

The BASIC definition is a reliable tool for identifying and classifying bleeding in critically ill children. Implementing this definition into clinical and research practice may provide a consistent and reliable evaluation of bleeding.

Protamine dosing and its impact in cardiac surgery transfusion practice-A retrospective bi-institutional analysis

BACKGROUND

Bleeding after cardiac surgery is common and continues to require 10-20% of the national blood supply. Transfusion of allogeneic blood is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Excessive protamine in the absence of circulating heparin after weaning off CPB can cause anticoagulation and precipitate bleeding. Hence, adequate dose calculation of protamine is crucial yet under evaluated.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective bi-institutional analysis of cardiac surgical patients who underwent cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)-assisted cardiac surgery to assess the impact of protamine dosing in transfusion practice. Total 762 patients were identified from two institutions using electronic medical records and the Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) database who underwent cardiac surgery using CPB. Patients were similar in demographics and other baseline characteristics. We divided patients into two groups based on mg of protamine administered to neutralize each 100 U of unfractionated heparin (UFH)-low-ratio group (Protamine: UFH ≤ 0.8) and high-ratio group (Protamine: UFH > 0.8).

RESULTS

We observed a higher rate of blood transfusion required in high-ratio group (ratio >0.8) compared with low-ratio group (ratio ≤0.8) (p < .001). The increased requirement was consistently demonstrated for intraoperative transfusions of red blood cells, plasma, platelets, and cryoprecipitate.

CONCLUSION

High protamine to heparin ratio may cause increased bleeding and transfusion in cardiac surgical patients. Protamine to heparin ratio of 0.8 or lower is sufficient to neutralize circulating heparin after weaning off cardiopulmonary bypass.

Tranexamic Acid in Cardiac Surgery: A Case Report of an Infrequent Adverse Reaction to a Common Medication

Life-threatening anaphylaxis to tranexamic acid (TXA) is rare but critical in cardiac surgery. A 76-year-old patient undergoing elective ascending aorta replacement developed severe anaphylactic shock shortly after anesthesia induction. Subsequent skin prick tests confirmed a positive TXA reaction. While TXA and lysine derivatives were avoided in the second surgery, the patient experienced hyperfibrinolysis. Guided by rotational thromboelastometry, hemostatic therapy led to a successful outcome with minimal postoperative bleeding. This report emphasizes the importance of drug risk awareness and strategies to mitigate excessive bleeding in cardiac surgery.