Radiolabeled Somatostatin Analogue Therapy Of Gastroenteropancreatic Cancer

Next-level precision medicine: why the theragnostic approach is the future

Theragnostics represents one of the most innovative fields of precision medicine with a huge potential in the field of oncology in the next years. The use of a pair of selective radiopharmaceuticals for cellular receptors, used for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes (PRRT), finds applications in the Neuroendocrine tumors and metastatic Castration-Resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) thanks, respectively, to somatostatin receptor agonists and PSMA-based peptides. Further evolutions of theragnostics will be possible to the radioimmunoconjugates used both in the diagnostic (Immuno-PET) and in the therapeutic fields (radioimmunotherapy). It is evident that in the "omics-era," theragnostics could become a necessary method, not only in order to improve our knowledge of tumor biology, but also, to find more and more targeted therapies in a multidisciplinary context and in a tailor-based approach.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy of Neuroendocrine Tumors: Agonist, Antagonist and Alternatives

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) today is a well-established treatment strategy for patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NET). First performed already more than 30 years ago, PRRT was incorporated only in recent years into the major oncology guidelines, based on its proven efficacy and safety in clinical trials. Following the phase 3 NETTER-1 trial, which led to the final registration of the radiopharmaceutical Luthatera® for G1/G2 NET patients in 2017, the long-term results of the phase 3 NETTER-2 trial may pave the way for a new treatment option also for advanced G2/G3 patients as first-line therapy. The growing knowledge about the synergistic effect of combined therapies could also allow alternative (re)treatment options for NET patients, in order to create a tailored treatment strategy. The evolving thera(g)nostic concept could be applied for the identification of patients who might benefit from different image-guided treatment strategies. In this scenario, the use of dual tracer PET/CT in NET patients, using both [18F]F-FDG/[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-somatostatin analog (SSA) for diagnosis and follow-up, is under discussion and could also result in a powerful prognostic tool. In addition, alternative strategies based on different metabolic pathways, radioisotopes, or combinations of different medical approaches could be applied. A number of different promising "doors" could thus open in the near future for the treatment of NET patients - and the "key" will be thera(g)nostic!

The cycle effect quantified: reduced tumour uptake in subsequent cycles of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE during peptide receptor radionuclide therapy

BACKGROUND

Clear evidence regarding the effect of reduced tumour accumulation in later peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) cycles is lacking. Therefore, we aimed to quantify potential cycle effects for patients treated with [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE using a population pharmacokinetic (PK) modelling approach.

METHODS

A population PK model was developed using imaging data from 48 patients who received multiple cycles of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE. The five-compartment model included a central, kidney, spleen, tumour and lumped rest compartment. Tumour volume and continued use of long-acting somatostatin analogues (SSAs) were tested as covariates in the model. In addition, the presence of a cycle effect was evaluated by relating the uptake rate in a specific cycle as a fraction of the (tumour or organ) uptake rate in the first cycle.

RESULTS

The final PK model adequately captured observed radioactivity accumulation in kidney, spleen and tumour. A higher tumour volume was identified to increase the tumour uptake rate, where a twofold increase in tumour volume resulted in a 2.3-fold higher uptake rate. Also, continued use of long-acting SSAs significantly reduced the spleen uptake rate (68.4% uptake compared to SSA withdrawal (10.5% RSE)). Lastly, a cycle effect was significantly identified, where tumour uptake rate decreased to 86.9% (5.3% RSE) in the second cycle and even further to 79.7% (5.6% RSE) and 77.6% (6.2% RSE) in the third and fourth cycle, respectively, compared to cycle one.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a population PK modelling approach, the cycle effect of reduced tumour uptake in subsequent PRRT cycles was quantified. Our findings implied that downregulation of target receptors is probably not the major cause of the cycle effect, due to a plateau in the decrease of tumour uptake in the fourth cycle.

Efficacy and safety of surufatinib in the treatment of advanced solid tumors: a systematic evaluation and meta‑analysis

Previous retrospective studies have suggested that surufatinib is effective for treating advanced solid tumors; however, the efficacy and safety of this drug needs to be investigated further via high-quality evidence or randomized controlled trials. In the present study, a meta-analysis was carried out to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of surufatinib for patients with advanced solid tumors. Systematic, electronic literature searches were conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov. The disease control rate (DCR) of surufatinib in solid tumors was 86% [effect size (ES), 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.82-0.90; I²=34%; P=0.208] and the objective response rate was 16% (ES, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.12-0.21; I²=48%; P=0.103), while the progressive disease rate was only 9% (ES, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.05-0.15; I²=68%, P=0.014). Surufatinib showed different degrees of adverse reactions during the treatment of solid tumors. Among these adverse events, the incidence of increased levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were 24% (ES, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.18-0.30; I²=45.1%; P=0.141) and 33% (ES, 0.33; 95%CI, 0.28-0.38; I²=63.9%; P=0.040), respectively. In the placebo-controlled trial, the relative risks (RRs) of elevated AST and ALT were 1.04 (95% CI, 0.54-2.02; I²=73.3%; P=0.053) and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.57-1.23; I²=0%; P=0.886), respectively. Overall, surufatinib was characterized by a high DCR and a low disease progression rate, thus indicating that it could exert a good therapeutic effect on solid tumors. Additionally, surufatinib showed a lower RR for adverse effects compared with other treatment modalities.

A Systematic Investigation into the Influence of Net Charge on the Biological Distribution of Radiometalated Peptides Using [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE Derivatives

Recently, several radiometalated peptides have been approved for clinical imaging and/or therapy (theranostics) of several types of cancer; nonetheless, the primary challenge that most of these peptides confront is significant renal uptake and retention, which is often dose limiting and can cause nephrotoxicity. In response to this, numerous methods have been employed to reduce the uptake of radiometalated peptides in the kidneys, and among these is adding a linker to modulate polarity and/or charge. To better understand the influence of net charge on the biodistribution of radiometalated peptides, we selected the clinically popular construct DOTA-TATE (NETSPOT/LUTATHERA) as a model system. We synthesized derivatives using manual solid-phase peptide synthesis methods including mechanical and ultrasonic agitation to effectively yield the gold standard DOTA-TATE and a series of derivatives with different net charges (+2, +1, 0, -1, -2). Dynamic PET imaging from 0 to 90 min in healthy female mice (CD1) revealed high accumulation and retention of activity in the kidneys for the net-neutral (0) charged [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE and even higher for positively charged derivatives, whereas negatively charged derivatives exhibited low accumulation and fast renal excretion. Ex vivo biodistribution at 2 h post injection demonstrated a significant retention of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE (∼74 %ID/g) in the kidneys, which increased as the net positive charge per molecule increased to +1 and +2 (∼272 %ID/g and ∼333 %ID/g, respectively), but the -1 and -2 net charged molecules exhibited lower renal uptake (∼15 %ID/g and 16 %ID/g, respectively). Interestingly, the net -2 charged [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-(Glu)₂-PEG₄-TATE was stable in blood serum but had much higher healthy organ uptake (lungs, liver, spleen) than the net -1 compound, suggesting instability in vivo. Although the [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-PEG₄-TATE derivative with a net charge of 0 also showed a decrease in kidney uptake, it also showed instability in blood serum and in vivo. Despite the superior pharmacokinetics of the net -1 charged [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-Glu-PEG₄-TATE in healthy mice with respect to kidney uptake and overall profile, dynamic PET images and ex vivo biodistribution in male mice (NSG) bearing AR42J (SSTR2 overexpressing) subcutaneous tumor xenografts showed significantly diminished tumor uptake when compared to the gold standard [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE. Taken together, these findings indicate unambiguously that kidney uptake and retention are significantly influenced by the net charge of peptide-based radiotracers. In addition, it was illustrated that the negatively charged peptides had substantially decreased kidney uptake, but in this instantiation the tumor uptake was also impaired.

Comparison of [18F]DOPA and [68Ga]DOTA-TOC as a PET imaging tracer before peptide receptor radionuclide therapy

Background

In treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), confirmation of somatostatin receptor expression with 68Ga-DOTA somatostatin analogues is mandatory to determine eligibility for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). [18F]DOPA can detect additional lesions compared to [68Ga]DOTA-TOC. The aim of this study was to explore differences in tumour detection of both tracers and their relevance for selecting patients for PRRT. We retrospectively studied eight patients with NENs who underwent both [68Ga]DOTA-TOC and carbidopa-enhanced [18F]DOPA PET/CT, before first-time PRRT with [177Lu]DOTA-TATE. Tracer order was influenced due to stock availability or to detect suspected metastases with a second tracer. On CT, disease control was defined as a lesion showing complete response, partial response, or stable disease, according to RECIST 1.1. criteria.

Results

Seven patients with in total 89 lesions completed four infusions of 7.4 GBq [177Lu]DOTA-TATE, one patient received only two cycles. Before treatment, [18F]DOPA PET/CT detected significantly more lesions than [68Ga]DOTA-TOC PET/CT (79 vs. 62, p < .001). After treatment, no difference in number of lesions with disease control was found for [18F]DOPA-only (5/27) and [68Ga]DOTA-TOC-only lesions (4/10, p = .25). [18F]DOPA detected more liver metastases (24/27) compared to [68Ga]DOTA-TOC (7/10, p = .006). Six patients showed inpatient heterogeneity in treatment response between [18F]DOPA-only and [68Ga]DOTA-TOC-only lesions.

Conclusions

Response to PRRT with [177Lu]DOTA-TATE was comparable for both [68Ga]DOTA-TOC- and [18F]DOPA-only NEN lesions. [18F]DOPA may be capable of predicting response to PRRT while finding more lesions compared to [68Ga]DOTA-TOC, although these additional lesions are often small of size and undetected by diagnostic CT.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy Using 177Lu-DOTATATE in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors (NETs) in a Limited-Resource Environment

Background  This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) using ¹⁷⁷ Lu-DOTA0-Tyr3-octreotate (DOTATATE) in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).

Methods  Sixteen patients with pathologically verified NETs including eight females and eight males were enrolled in this study. Before PRRT, the patients underwent ⁶⁸ Ga-DOTATATE positron emission tomography/computed tomography or ^99m Tc-octreotide scintigraphy for evaluation of somatostatin receptor expression. Response to treatment was assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) classified as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD). In addition, for evaluation of toxicity, monthly blood analysis was performed including hematology, renal function (creatinine) test, and liver function test. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status performance was applied to estimate the patients' general condition in a scale of 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead). In addition, overall survival (OS) was calculated as the time interval from the start of PRRT to death from any reason.

Results  Sixteen patients including eight females and eight males with a median age of 60.5 years (range: 24–74) were enrolled in this study. The patients underwent PRRT with a median cycle of 3.5 (range: 1–7) and a median dose of 20.35 (range: 7.4–49.95 GBq). At the end of data collection, PR, CR, SD, and PD were seen in 11, 2, 1, and 2 patients according to the RECIST, respectively. Three patients expired during or after the PRRT period. The median ECOG and Karnofsky Performance Scale was 1.5 and 75 before PRRT, which improved significantly to 1 and 80 after PRRT, respectively ( p  < 0.05). According to the Kaplan–Meier test, the median OS was 23 months (95% confidence interval: 7.90–38.09). According to the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, three patients showed grade I and three patients showed grade II leucopenia. Furthermore, three and seven patients had grade II and grade I anemia, respectively.

Conclusion  Since PRRT using ¹⁷⁷ Lu-DOTATATE has a favorable response rate and few adverse effects and improves the quality of life in NETs, it can be used as an effective therapeutic option, especially in nonoperative, metastatic, and progressive NETs.

Radiotheranostics in oncology: current challenges and emerging opportunities

Structural imaging remains an essential component of diagnosis, staging and response assessment in patients with cancer; however, as clinicians increasingly seek to noninvasively investigate tumour phenotypes and evaluate functional and molecular responses to therapy, theranostics - the combination of diagnostic imaging with targeted therapy - is becoming more widely implemented. The field of radiotheranostics, which is the focus of this Review, combines molecular imaging (primarily PET and SPECT) with targeted radionuclide therapy, which involves the use of small molecules, peptides and/or antibodies as carriers for therapeutic radionuclides, typically those emitting α-, β- or auger-radiation. The exponential, global expansion of radiotheranostics in oncology stems from its potential to target and eliminate tumour cells with minimal adverse effects, owing to a mechanism of action that differs distinctly from that of most other systemic therapies. Currently, an enormous opportunity exists to expand the number of patients who can benefit from this technology, to address the urgent needs of many thousands of patients across the world. In this Review, we describe the clinical experience with established radiotheranostics as well as novel areas of research and various barriers to progress.

The Quest for an Accurate Functional Tumor Volume with 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT

⁶⁸Ga-labeled somatostatin analog (SSA) PET/CT is now a standard-of-care component in the management of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). However, treatment response for NETs is still assessed with morphologic size measurements from other modalities, which can result in inaccuracy about the disease burden. Functional tumor volume (FTV) acquired from SSA PET/CT has been suggested as a possible metric, but no validated measurement tool to measure FTV exists. We tested the precision of multiple FTV computational approaches compared with morphologic volume measurements to identify a candidate for incorporation into future FTV studies to assess tumor burden more completely and accurately. Methods: The clinical and imaging data of 327 NET patients were collected at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between December 2016 and April 2018. Patients were required to have SSA PET/CT and dedicated CT scans within 6 wk and were excluded if they had any intervention between scans. When paired studies were evaluated, 150 correlating lesions demonstrated SSA. Lesions were excluded if they contained necrotic components or were lobulated. This exclusion resulted in 94 lesions in 20 patients. The FTV for each lesion was evaluated with a hand-drawn assessment and 3 automated techniques: 50% threshold from SUV_max, 42% threshold from SUV_max, and background-subtracted lesion activity. These measurements were compared with volume calculated from morphologic volume measurements. Results: The FTV calculation methods showed varying correlations with morphologic volume measurements. FTV using a 42% threshold had a 0.706 correlation, hand-drawn volume from PET imaging had a 0.657 correlation, FTV using a 50% threshold had a 0.645 correlation, and background-subtracted lesion activity had a 0.596 correlation. The Bland-Altman plots indicated that all FTV methods had a positive mean difference from morphologic volume, with a 50% threshold showing the smallest mean difference. Conclusion: FTV determined with thresholding of SUV_max demonstrated the strongest correlation with traditional morphologic lesion volume assessment and the least bias. This method was more accurate than FTV calculated from hand-drawn volume assessments. Threshold-based automated FTV assessment promises to better determine disease extent and prognosis in patients with NETs.

Integration of molecular imaging in the personalized approach to neuroendocrine tumors

NETs lesions can be difficult to characterize with conventional anatomic imaging (CT and MRI). Functional imaging techniques, and especially PET imaging, are very useful for detecting small neuroendocrine tumors that would not be seen with other techniques. The role of nuclear medicine in the localization, staging, restaging, treatment and monitoring of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has become progressively more relevant due to: the availability of tracers on new targets, tracers for positron emission tomography (PET); the development of cyclotrons and generators that allow this availability; as well as to hybrid systems (SPECT/CT, PET/CT and PET/MRI) that, by joining the functional and anatomical image, improve the quality of the images. Teragnosis, a new emerging therapy, in NET used receptor-mediated or nonreceptor- mediated mechanism to facilitate penetration and high-affinity binding between the radiopharmaceutical and the tumor cell. Teragnosis offers the possibility of personalized targeted radionuclide therapy.

Differenzierte Therapiestrategie bei Lebermetastasen gastro-entero-pankreatischer Neuroendokriner Neoplasien

Neuroendokrine Neoplasien (NEN) bilden eine heterogene Gruppe maligner Tumoren, die überwiegend dem gastro-entero-pankreatischen System (GEP) zuzuordnen sind. Hierbei sind Dünndarm und Pankreas die häufigsten Organe für Primärtumoren, die Leber stellt den dominanten Metastasierungsort dar. Da viele Patient*innen lange asymptomatisch bleiben, führen oftmals zufällig diagnostizierte Lebermetastasen oder ein Ileus zur Diagnose. Die einzige kurative Therapieoption stellt die komplette Entfernung von Primarius und Metastasen dar. Besonders im Falle der metastasierten Erkrankung sollten die vorhandenen Therapieoptionen immer im interdisziplinären Tumorboard mit Spezialisten*innen aus Gastroenterologie, (Leber-)Chirurgie, Radiologie, Nuklearmedizin, Radiotherapie, Pathologie und Endokrinologie evaluiert werden. Durch die Kombination der verschiedenen Therapieverfahren kann auch für Patient*innen mit fortgeschrittener Erkrankung eine jahrelange Prognose bei guter Lebensqualität erreicht werden. Wichtig für die Therapieentscheidung sind neben patientenindividuellen Faktoren der Differenzierungsgrad des Tumors, dessen hormonelle Sekretion, das Metastasierungsmuster und der Erkrankungsverlauf. Die Behandlung von Lebermetastasen umfasst neben den unterschiedlichen chirurgischen Strategien die lokal-ablativen radiologischen und nuklearmedizinischen Verfahren, die als Ergänzung zu den systemischen Therapien zur Verfügung stehen.

Radiolabeled Nanocarriers as Theranostics-Advancement from Peptides to Nanocarriers

Endogenous targeted radiotherapy is emerging as an integral modality to treat a variety of cancer entities. Nevertheless, despite the positive clinical outcome of the treatment using radiolabeled peptides, small molecules, antibodies, and nanobodies, a high degree of hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity still persist. This limits the amount of dose that can be injected. In an attempt to mitigate these side effects, the use of nanocarriers such as nanoparticles (NPs), dendrimers, micelles, liposomes, and nanogels (NGs) is currently being explored. Nanocarriers can prolong circulation time and tumor retention, maximize radiation dosage, and offer multifunctionality for different targeting strategies. In this review, the authors first provide a summary of radiation therapy and imaging and discuss the new radiotracers that are used preclinically and clinically. They then highlight and identify the advantages of radio-nanomedicine and its potential in overcoming the limitations of endogenous radiotherapy. Finally, the review points to the ongoing efforts to maximize the use of radio-nanomedicine for efficient clinical translation.

Toxicity and Tolerability of 177Lu-DOTA-TATE PRRT with a Modified Administered Activity Protocol in NETs of Variable Origin - A Phase 2 Registry Study

BACKGROUND

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has been recently approved for advanced, metastatic, or progressive neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).

OBJECTIVE

This study reports the adverse events (AEs) observed with patient-tailored administered activity.

METHODS

Fifty-two PRRT naive patients were treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE. The administered activity ranges between 2.78 and 5.55 GBq/cycle using the patient's unique characteristics (age, symptoms, blood work, and biomarkers).

RESULTS

The protocol was well tolerated with the overwhelming majority of participants being forty- six (88%), completing all 4 induction therapy cycles. The median cumulative administered activity was 19.6 GBq (ranged 3.8-22.3 GBq). A total of 42/52 (81%) reported at least one symptom, and 43/52 (83%) had evidence of biochemical abnormality at enrollment that would meet grade 1 or 2 criteria for AEs. These symptoms only slightly increase with treatment to 50/52 (96%) and 51/52 (98%), respectively. The most common symptoms were mild fatigue (62%), shortness of breath (50%), nausea (44%), abdominal pain (38%), and musculoskeletal pain (37%). The most common biomarker abnormalities were mild anemia (81%), reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (58%), increased alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (50%), and leukopenia (37%). Of critical importance, no 177Lu-DOTATATE related grade 3 or 4 AEs were observed.

CONCLUSION

Tailoring the administered activity of 177Lu-DOTATATE to the individual patient with a variety of NETs is both safe and well-tolerated. No patient developed severe grade 3 or 4 AEs. Most patients exhibit symptoms or biochemical abnormality before treatment and this only slightly worsens following induction therapy.

Advances in the Diagnosis and Therapeutic Management of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (GEP-NENs)

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are an increasingly common cause of neoplastic diseases. One of the largest groups of NENs are neoplasms localized to the gastroenteropancreatic system, which are known as gastroenteropancreatic NENs (GEP-NENs). Because of nonspecific clinical symptoms, GEP-NEN patient diagnosis and, consequently, their treatment, might be difficult and delayed. This situation has forced researchers all over the world to continue progress in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with GEP-NENs. Our review is designed to present the latest reports on the laboratory diagnostic techniques, imaging tests and surgical and nonsurgical treatment strategies used for patients with these rare neoplasms. We paid particular attention to the nuclear approach, the use of which has been applied to GEP-NEN patient diagnosis, and to nonsurgical and radionuclide treatment strategies. Recent publications were reviewed in search of reports on new strategies for effective disease management. Attention was also paid to those studies still in progress, but with successful results. A total of 248 papers were analyzed, from which 141 papers most relevant to the aim of the study were selected. Using these papers, we highlight the progress in the development of diagnostic and treatment strategies for patients with GEP-NENs.

Treatment of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms with Radiolabeled Peptides-Where Are We Now

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has been one of the most successful and exciting examples of theranostics in nuclear medicine in recent decades and is now firmly embedded in many treatment algorithms for unresectable or metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) worldwide. It is widely considered to be an effective treatment for well- or moderately differentiated neoplasms, which express high levels of somatostatin receptors that can be selectively targeted. This review article outlines the scientific basis of PRRT in treatment of NENs and describes its discovery dating back to the early 1990s. Early treatments utilizing Indium-111, a γ-emitter, showed promise in reduction in tumor size and improvement in biochemistry, but were also met with high radiation doses and myelotoxic and nephrotoxic effects. Subsequently, stable conjugation of DOTA-peptides with β-emitting radionuclides, such as Yttrium-90 and Lutetium-177, served as a breakthrough for PRRT and studies highlighted their potential in eliciting progression-free survival and quality of life benefits. This article will also elaborate on the key trials which paved the way for its approval and will discuss therapeutic considerations, such as patient selection and administration technique, to optimize its use.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE in Patients with Advanced GEP NENS: Present and Future Directions

Simple Summary

Neuroendocrine neoplasms have been usually described as infrequent tumors, but their incidence has been rising over time. [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE (PRRT-Lu) was approved by the European Medicines Agency and by the Food and Drug Administration as the first radiopharmaceutical for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in progressive gastroenteropancreatic NET. PRRT-Lu is considered a therapeutic option in progressive SSTR-positive NETs with homogenous SSTR expression. The NETTER-1 study demonstrated that PRRT-Lu yielded a statistically and clinically significant improvement in PFS as a primary endpoint (HR: 0.18, p < 0.0001), as well as a clinical trend towards improvement in OS. These results made scientific societies incorporate PRRT-Lu into their clinical guidelines; however, some questions still remain unanswered.

Abstract

This review article summarizes findings published in the last years on peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in GEP NENs, as well as potential future developments and directions. Unanswered questions remain, such as the following: Which is the correct dose and individual dosimetry? Which is the place for salvage PRRT-Lu? Whicht is the role of PRRT-Lu in the pediatric population? Which is the optimal sequencing of PRRT-Lu in advanced GEP NETs? Which is the place of PRRT-Lu in G3 NENs? These, and future developments such as inclusion new radiopharmaceuticals and combination therapy with different agents, such as radiosensitizers, will be discussed.

Somatostatin and Somatostatin Receptors: From Signaling to Clinical Applications in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are heterogeneous neoplasms which arise from neuroendocrine cells that are distributed widely throughout the body. Although heterogenous, many of them share their ability to overexpress somatostatin receptors (SSTR) on their cell surface. Due to this, SSTR and somatostatin have been a large subject of interest in the discovery of potential biomarkers and treatment options for the disease. The aim of this review is to describe the molecular characteristics of somatostatin and somatostatin receptors and its application in diagnosis and therapy on patients with NENs as well as the use in the near future of somatostatin antagonists.

Side effects of theragnostic agents currently employed in clinical practice

Nuclear medicine plays an increasingly important role in several neoplasms management through a theragnostic approach by which targeted molecular imaging and radiotherapy are obtained with the use of radionuclide pairs with similar characteristics. In some cases, nuclear theragnostic use a pair of agents with identical chemical and biological characteristics while in others are employed theragnostic molecules which are not chemically or biologically identical but show similar biodistribution (so-called "twins in spirit" radiopharmaceuticals). This strategy was developed for the first time over 75 years ago, when iodine-131 was used for diagnostic imaging, confirmation of target expression and radionuclide therapy of thyroid cancer. Other theragnostic approaches were subsequently introduced with significant clinical results and some of them are currently considered standard treatment for different cancers. However, as any other therapy, also nuclear theragnostic treatment carries the potential risk of early deterministic and late stochastic off-target adverse effects, generally minimal and easily managed. This article reviews the reported side effects and risks of the main radiopharmaceuticals used for nuclear theragnostic in oncology for the treatment of thyroid cancer, neuroendocrine neoplasms, adrenergic tumors, metastatic prostate cancer, and liver tumors. Selecting appropriate patients using a multidisciplinary approach, meticulous pretreatment planning and knowledge of methods permit to decrease the incidence of these potential side effects.

Breaking the Silence of Tumor Response: Future Prospects of Targeted Radionuclide Therapy

Therapy-induced tumor resistance has always been a paramount hurdle in the clinical triumph of cancer therapy. Resistance acquired by tumor through interventions of chemotherapeutic drugs, ionizing radiation, and immunotherapy in the patientsis a severe drawback and major cause of recurrence of tumor and failure of therapeutic responses. To counter acquired resistance in tumor cells, several strategies are practiced such as chemotherapy regimens, immunotherapy, and immunoconjugates, but the outcome is very disappointing for the patients as well as clinicians. Radionuclide therapy using alpha or beta-emitting radionuclide as payload became state-of-the-art for cancer therapy. With the improvement in dosimetric studies, development of high-affinity target molecules, and design of several novel chelating agents which provide thermodynamically stable complexes in vivo, the scope of radionuclide therapy has increased by leaps and bounds. Additionally, radionuclide therapy along with the combination of chemotherapy is gaining importance in pre-clinics, which is quite encouraging. Thus, it opens an avenue for newer cancer therapy modalities where chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and immunotherapy are unable to break the silence of tumor response. This article describes, in brief, the causes of tumor resistance and discusses the potential of radionuclide therapy to enhance tumor response.

Treatment of advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasia, are we on the way to personalised medicine?

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasia (GEPNEN) comprises clinically as well as prognostically diverse tumour entities often diagnosed at late stage. Current classification provides a uniform terminology and a Ki67-based grading system, thereby facilitating management. Advances in the study of genomic and epigenetic landscapes have amplified knowledge of tumour biology and enhanced identification of prognostic and potentially predictive treatment subgroups. Translation of this genomic and mechanistic biology into advanced GEPNEN management is limited. 'Targeted' treatments such as somatostatin analogues, peptide receptor radiotherapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors are treatment options but predictive tools are lacking. The inability to identify clonal heterogeneity and define critical oncoregulatory pathways prior to therapy, restrict therapeutic efficacy as does the inability to monitor disease status in real time. Chemotherapy in the poor prognosis NEN G3 group, though associated with acceptable response rates, only leads to short-term tumour control and their molecular biology requires delineation to provide new and more specific treatment options.The future requires an exploration of the NEN tumour genome, its microenvironment and an identification of critical oncologic checkpoints for precise drug targeting. In the advance to personalised medical treatment of patients with GEPNEN, clinical trials need to be based on mechanistic and multidimensional characterisation of each tumour in order to identify the therapeutic agent effective for the individual tumour.This review surveys advances in NEN research and delineates the current status of translation with a view to laying the basis for a genome-based personalised medicine management of advanced GEPNEN.

68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT Imaging of Refractory Pituitary Macroadenoma Invading the Orbit

ABSTRACT

In addition to gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, a wide variety of tumors express somatostatin receptors. Somatostatin receptor imaging, heavily utilized in neuroendocrine oncology, may also have utility in the diagnosis of other neoplasms and raises the possibility of potential therapeutic options. We describe the case of a 60-year-old man who underwent 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT, demonstrating an avid invasive pituitary macroadenoma. This mass was persistent and refractory despite traditional treatment options. Because of the avidity, 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy was offered, although not ultimately performed, demonstrating a potential treatment for challenging cases utilizing the principles of theranostics.

Indications of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) in Gastroenteropancreatic and Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Tumors: An Updated Review

Radionuclide therapy for neuroendocrine tumors is a form of systemic radiotherapy that allows the administration of targeted radionuclides into tumor cells that express a large quantity of somatostatin receptors. The two most commonly used radio-peptides for radionuclide therapy in neuroendocrine tumors are ⁹⁰Y-DOTATOC and ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE. Radio-peptides have been used for several years in the treatment of advanced neuroendocrine tumors. Recently, the randomized Phase III study NETTER-1 compared¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE versus high-dose (double-dose) octreotide LAR in patients with metastatic midgut neuroendocrine tumors, and demonstrated its efficacy in this setting. Strong signals in favor of efficiency seem to exist for other tumors, in particular for pancreatic and pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors. This focus on radionuclide therapy in gastroenteropancreatic and pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors addresses the treatment modalities, the validated and potential indications, and the safety of the therapy.

Overcoming Barriers to Radiopharmaceutical Therapy (RPT): An Overview From the NRG-NCI Working Group on Dosimetry of Radiopharmaceutical Therapy

Radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) continues to demonstrate tremendous potential in improving the therapeutic gains in radiation therapy by specifically delivering radiation to tumors that can be well assessed in terms of dosimetry and imaging. Dosimetry in external beam radiation therapy is standard practice. This is not the case, however, in RPT. This NRG (acronym formed from the first letter of the 3 original groups: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, and the Gynecologic Oncology Group)-National Cancer Institute Working Group review describes some of the challenges to improving RPT. The main priorities for advancing the field include (1) developing and adopting best practice guidelines for incorporating patient-specific dosimetry for RPT that can be used at both large clinics with substantial resources and more modest clinics that have limited resources, (2) establishing and improving strategies for introducing new radiopharmaceuticals for clinical investigation, (3) developing approaches to address the radiophobia that is associated with the administration of radioactivity for cancer therapy, and (4) solving the financial and logistical issues of expertise and training in the developing field of RPT.

Medicinal inorganic chemistry: an updated review on the status of metallodrugs and prominent metallodrug candidates

Metallodrugs correspond to a small portion of all available drugs in the market and, yet, some of them are among the most used and important drugs in modern medicine. However, medicinal inorganic chemistry remains an underestimated area within medicinal chemistry and the main reason is the mislead association of metals to toxic agents. Thus, in this review, the potential of medicinal inorganic chemistry in drug designing is highlighted through a description of the current status of metallodrugs and metallodrug candidates in advanced clinical trials. The broad spectrum of application of metal-based drugs in medicine for both therapy and diagnosis is addressed by the extensive list of examples presented herein.

Efficacy of 177Lu-Dotatate Induction and Maintenance Therapy of Various Types of Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Phase II Registry Study

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has been recently established as a treatment option for progressive gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) including four 200 mCi induction cycles. The purpose of this phase 2 trial is to expand use of PRRT to different types of NETs with the application of dose adjustment and evaluate value of maintenance therapy in patients who had disease control on induction therapy. Forty-seven PRRT naïve NET patients with different primary origin received ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE induction therapy, ranging from 75 to 150 mCi per cycle, based on patients’ clinical status such as liver and renal function, extent of metastases, and previous therapies. Thirty-four patients underwent additional maintenance therapy (50–100 mCi per cycle) following induction course until they developed disease progression. The estimated median progression-free survival (PFS) was 36.1 months. The median PFS in our MNET subgroup was 47.7 months, which is markedly longer than NETTER-1 trial with median PFS of 28.4 months. The median PFS was significantly longer in patients who received PRRT as first-line treatment after disease progression on somatostatin analogs compared to patients who received other therapies first (p-value = 0.04). The total disease response rate (DRR) and disease control rate (DCR) was 32% and 85% based on RECIST 1.1 and 45% and 83% based on Choi criteria. This trial demonstrates longer PFS with the addition of low dose maintenance therapy to induction therapy compared to NETTER-1 trial that only included induction therapy. Also, we observed considerable efficacy of PRRT in various types of advanced NETs.

Approach to the Treatment of a Patient with an Aggressive Pituitary Tumor

A small subset of pituitary adenomas grows despite maximal treatment with standard therapies; namely, surgery and radiotherapy. These aggressive tumors demonstrate 2 patterns of growth: they may be locally aggressive or metastasize distantly, either hematogenously or through the spinal fluid. Further surgery and radiotherapy may be helpful for palliation of symptoms, but they are rarely definitive in the management of these malignant tumors. The only chemotherapy with established activity in the treatment of pituitary tumors is the alkylating agent temozolomide. At most, 50% of patients exhibit an objective response to temozolomide and the median time to progression is short; thus, there remains a significant unmet need for effective treatments within this patient population. Several targeted agents have reported activity in this tumor type-including small molecule inhibitors, checkpoint inhibitors, and other biologics-but remain investigational at this time.

How We Do It: A Multidisciplinary Approach to 177Lu DOTATATE Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy

Lutetium 177 (¹⁷⁷Lu) DOTA-0-Tyr3-Octreotate (DOTATATE) peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an effective treatment for advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. This review presents a clinical practice workflow that has been successful since ¹⁷⁷Lu DOTATATE PRRT was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The workflow relies heavily on the input of a multidisciplinary team and involves a nuclear medicine consultation service, tumor board, and specific preparations in advance of therapy and day-of-therapy procedures. A systematic checklist designed to ensure appropriate selection of treatment candidates and identification of any concerns to address to safely administer PRRT is provided. All patients were evaluated with gallium 68 DOTATATE PET/CT, and in cases of high-grade tumors, they were also evaluated with fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT, with imaging findings reviewed as part of the systematic checklist before PRRT. Adverse effects are discussed and imaging follow-up regimens are reviewed, including alternative diagnostic contrast materials. Approaches to multiple challenging patient scenarios are illustrated through case examples. Finally, alternative theranostic radionuclides and treatment strategies are discussed.

Phase 0 Radiopharmaceutical-Agent Clinical Development

The evaluation of antibody-targeted or peptide-targeted radiopharmaceuticals as monotherapy or in oncological drug combinations requires programmatic collaboration within the National Cancer Institute (NCI) clinical trial enterprise. Phase 0 trials provide a flexible research platform for the study of radiopharmaceutical–drug pharmacokinetics, radiation dosimetry, biomarkers of DNA damage response modulation, and pharmacodynamic benchmarks predictive of therapeutic success. In this article, we discuss a phase 0 clinical development approach for human antibody-targeted or peptide-targeted radiopharmaceutical–agent combinations. We expect that early-phase radiopharmaceutical–agent combination trials will become a more tactical and more prevalent part of radiopharmaceutical clinical development in the near-term future for the NCI Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program.

Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: 2020 Update on Pathologic and Imaging Findings and Classification

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs) are heterogeneous neoplasms with neuroendocrine differentiation that show characteristic clinical, histomorphologic, and prognostic features; genetic alterations; and biologic behavior. Up to 10% of panNENs develop in patients with syndromes that predispose them to cancer, such as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, von Hippel-Lindau disease, tuberous sclerosis complex, neurofibromatosis type 1, and glucagon cell adenomatosis. PanNENs are classified as either functioning tumors, which manifest early because of clinical symptoms related to increased hormone production, or nonfunctioning tumors, which often manifest late because of mass effect. PanNENs are histopathologically classified as well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs) or poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (panNECs) according to the 2010 World Health Organization (WHO) classification system. Recent advances in cytogenetics and molecular biology have shown substantial heterogeneity in panNECs, and a new tumor subtype, well-differentiated, high-grade panNET, has been introduced. High-grade panNETs and panNECs are two distinct entities with different pathogenesis, clinical features, imaging findings, treatment options, and prognoses. The 2017 WHO classification system and the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system include substantial changes. Multidetector CT, MRI, and endoscopic US help in anatomic localization of the primary tumor, local-regional spread, and metastases. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and fluorine 18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT are helpful for functional and metabolic assessment. Knowledge of recent updates in the pathogenesis, classification, and staging of panNENs and familiarity with their imaging findings allow optimal patient treatment. ^©RSNA, 2020.

Radiopharmaceutical therapy in cancer: clinical advances and challenges

Radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) is emerging as a safe and effective targeted approach to treating many types of cancer. In RPT, radiation is systemically or locally delivered using pharmaceuticals that either bind preferentially to cancer cells or accumulate by physiological mechanisms. Almost all radionuclides used in RPT emit photons that can be imaged, enabling non-invasive visualization of the biodistribution of the therapeutic agent. Compared with almost all other systemic cancer treatment options, RPT has shown efficacy with minimal toxicity. With the recent FDA approval of several RPT agents, the remarkable potential of this treatment is now being recognized. This Review covers the fundamental properties, clinical development and associated challenges of RPT.

Radiopharmaceutical therapy is emerging as a safe and effective approach for the treatment of cancer, offering several advantages over existing therapeutic strategies. Here, Sgouros and colleagues provide an overview of the fundamental properties of radiopharmaceutical therapy, discuss agents in use and in clinical development and highlight the associated translational challenges.

Theranostic approaches in nuclear medicine: current status and future prospects

Introduction: Theranostics is an emerging field in which diagnosis and specific targeted therapy are combined to achieve a personalized treatment approach to the patient. In nuclear medicine clinical practice, theranostics is often performed utilizing the same molecule labeled with two different radionuclides, one radionuclide for imaging and another for therapy.Areas covered: The authors review the clinical applications of different radiopharmaceuticals in the field of interest, including the well-established use of radioactive iodine in differentiated thyroid cancer, radiolabeled metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) in neuroblastoma and the clinical impact of peptide radionuclide receptorial therapy (PRRT) in the management of neuroendocrine tumors. Furthermore, the more cutting-edge and recently introduced theranostic approaches will be reviewed, such as the radioligand therapy with ¹⁷⁷Lu-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and targeted alpha therapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Finally, the main applications of PET for the imaging of biomarkers suitable for the non-radionuclide targeted therapy will be covered.Expert opinion: Theranostics is envisaging a revolutionary clinical approach which is deeply connected with the concept of personalized medicine and ruled by a 'patient-centered' vision. In this perspective, the theranostic applications will need well-trained specialists, capable to manage not only the technological aspects of the discipline, but also to deal with the more innovative oncological therapies in a multidisciplinary setting.

Endocrinological Toxicity Secondary to Treatment of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (GEP-NENs)

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) are increasingly recognized, characterized by prolonged survival even with metastatic disease. Their medical treatment is complex involving various specialties, necessitating awareness of treatment-related adverse effects (AEs). As GEP-NENs express somatostatin receptors (SSTRs), long-acting somatostatin analogs (SSAs) that are used for secretory syndrome and tumor control may lead to altered glucose metabolism. Everolimus and sunitinib are molecular targeted agents that affect glucose and lipid metabolism and may induce hypothyroidism or hypocalcemia, respectively. Chemotherapeutic drugs can affect the reproductive system and water homeostasis, whereas immunotherapeutic agents can cause hypophysitis and thyroiditis or other immune-mediated disorders. Treatment with radiopeptides may temporarily lead to radiation-induced hormone disturbances. As drugs targeting GEP-NENs are increasingly introduced, recognition and management of endocrine-related AEs may improve compliance and the quality of life of these patients.

Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Small Bowel and Pancreas

The traditionally promulgated perspectives of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) as rare, indolent tumours are blunt and have been outdated for the last 2 decades. Clear increments in their incidence over the past decades render them increasingly clinically relevant, and at initial diagnosis many present with nodal and/or distant metastases (notably hepatic). The molecular pathogenesis of these tumours is increasingly yet incompletely understood. Those arising from the small bowel (SB) or pancreas typically occur sporadically; the latter may occur within the context of hereditary tumour predisposition syndromes. NENs can also be associated with endocrinopathy of hormonal hypersecretion. Tangible advances in the development of novel biomarkers, functional imaging modalities and therapy are especially applicable to this sub-set of tumours. The management of SB and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NET) may be challenging, and often comprises a multidisciplinary approach wherein surgical, medical, interventional radiological and radiotherapeutic modalities are implemented. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of SB and pancreatic NETs. Moreover, we provide an outlook of the future in these tumour types which will include the development of precision oncology frameworks for individualised therapy, multi-analyte predictive biomarkers, artificial intelligence-derived clinical decision support tools and elucidation of the role of the microbiome in NEN development and clinical behaviour.

Preclinical study of a new 177Lu-labeled somatostatin receptor antagonist in HT-29 human colorectal cancer cells

OBJECTIVES

Somatostatin receptor-positive neuroendocrine tumors have been targeted using various peptide analogs radiolabeled with therapeutic radionuclides for years. The better biomedical properties of radioantagonists as higher tumor uptake make these radioligands more attractive than agonists for somatostatin receptor-targeted radionuclide therapy. In this study, we tried to evaluate the efficiency of Luthetium-177 (177Lu) radiolabeled DOTA-Peptide 2 (177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2) as a new radioantagonist in HT-29 human colorectal cancer in vitro and in vivo.

METHODS

DOTA conjugated antagonistic peptide with the sequence of p-Cl-Phe-Cyclo(D-Cys-L-BzThi-D-Aph-Lys-Thr-Cys)-D-Tyr-NH2 (DOTA-Peptide 2) was labeled with 177Lu. In vitro assays (saturation binding assay and internalization test) and animal biodistribution were performed in human colon adenocarcinoma cells (HT-29) and HT-29 tumor-bearing nude mice.

RESULTS

177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2 showed high stability in acetate buffer and human plasma (>97%). Antagonistic property of 177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2 was confirmed by low internalization in HT-29 cells (<5%). The desired dissociation constant (Kd =11.14 nM) and effective tumor uptake (10.89 percentage of injected dose per gram of tumor) showed high binding affinity of 177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2 to somatostatin receptors.

CONCLUSION

177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2 demonstrated selective and high binding affinity to somatostatin receptors overexpressed on the surface of HT-29 cancer cells, which could make this radiopeptide suitable for somatostatin receptor-targeted radionuclide therapy.

Inflammation-Based Index and 68Ga-DOTATOC PET-Derived Uptake and Volumetric Parameters Predict Outcome in Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients Treated with 90Y-DOTATOC

We performed post hoc analyses on the utility of pretherapeutic and early interim ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC PET tumor uptake and volumetric parameters and a recently proposed biomarker, the inflammation-based index (IBI), for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in neuroendocrine tumor (NET) patients treated with ⁹⁰Y-DOTATOC in the setting of a prospective phase II trial. Methods: Forty-three NET patients received up to 4 cycles of ⁹⁰Y-DOTATOC at 1.85 GBq/m²/cycle with a maximal kidney biologic effective dose of 37 Gy. All patients underwent ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT at baseline and 7 wk after the first PRRT cycle. ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC-avid tumor lesions were semiautomatically delineated using a customized SUV threshold-based approach. PRRT response was assessed on CT using RECIST 1.1. Results: Median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were 13.9 and 22.3 mo, respectively. An SUV_mean higher than 13.7 (75th percentile) was associated with better survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; P = 0.024), whereas a ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC-avid tumor volume higher than 578 cm³ (75th percentile) was associated with worse OS (HR, 2.18; P = 0.037). Elevated baseline IBI was associated with worse OS (HR, 3.90; P = 0.001). Multivariate analysis corroborated independent associations between OS and SUV_mean (P = 0.016) and IBI (P = 0.015). No significant correlations with progression-free survival were found. A composite score based on SUV_mean and IBI allowed us to further stratify patients into 3 categories with significantly different survival. On early interim PET, a decrease in SUV_mean of more than 17% (75th percentile) was associated with worse survival (HR, 2.29; P = 0.024). Conclusion: Normal baseline IBI and high ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC tumor uptake predict better outcome in NET patients treated with ⁹⁰Y-DOTATOC. This method can be used for treatment personalization. Interim ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC PET does not provide information for treatment personalization.

New and emerging systemic therapy options for well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Introduction: Well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms with a wide range of clinical behavior. Multiple treatment modalities exist, including novel and emerging systemic options, and an understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of each is imperative for optimizing the outcomes of patients with GEP-NETs.Areas covered: While surgical resection remains the preferred treatment for localized well-differentiated GEP-NETs, treatment of unresectable disease depends on its extent, location, and distribution as well as underlying aspects of tumor biology. Isolated hepatic metastases can be successfully treated with liver-directed therapies such as hepatic arterial based therapies or ablation. Diffuse metastatic disease often requires systemic treatments such as molecular-targeted therapeutics, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), or traditional chemotherapy. Somatostatin analogs are often the primary treatment option capable of simultaneously inhibiting hormone production and slowing tumor growth.Expert opinion: Recent advances in systemic treatment options for advanced well-differentiated GEP-NETs have emerged due to an improved understanding of the molecular mechanisms responsible for tumor development and progression. Future research is needed to determine the optimal indications for and sequencing of these novel therapies.

Phase I Trial of Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors (NETs) with Radiolabeled Somatostatin Antagonist 177Lu-Satoreotide Tetraxetan

PURPOSE

Radiolabeled somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) antagonists have shown higher tumor uptake and tumor-to-organ ratios than somatostatin agonists in preclinical models of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). We performed a phase I study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SSTR2 antagonist ¹⁷⁷Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty patients with advanced SSTR2-positive NETs were treated with ¹⁷⁷Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan. Patients first underwent a dosimetry study with ¹⁷⁷Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan to determine the therapeutic activity that could be safely administered. This activity was split into two equal cycles to be delivered 3 months apart. The maximum activity was 7.4 GBq per cycle.

RESULTS

Of 20 patients with NETs (one lung, seven small bowel, nine pancreatic, one gastric, one rectal, one kidney; mean prior treatments: three), six received one cycle of ¹⁷⁷Lu- satoreotide tetraxetan and 14 received two cycles. Hematologic toxicity after cycle 1 was mild-moderate and reversed before cycle 2. However, grade 4 hematologic toxicity occurred in four of seven (57%) patients after cycle 2 of ¹⁷⁷Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan. The study was suspended, and the protocol modified to limit the cumulative absorbed bone marrow dose to 1 Gy and to reduce prescribed activity for cycle 2 by 50%. The best overall response rate was 45% [5% complete response (1/20), 40% partial response (8/20)]; with 40% stable disease (8/20) and 15% progression of disease (3/20). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 21.0 months (95% CI, 13.6-NR).

CONCLUSIONS

In this trial of heavily treated NETs, preliminary data are promising for the use of ¹⁷⁷Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan. Additional studies are ongoing to determine optimal therapeutic dose/schedule.

Quality of life in patients with midgut NET following peptide receptor radionuclide therapy

OBJECTIVES

There is convincing evidence that peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) using ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE compared to octreotide therapy has a positive effect on overall survival and progression-free survival in midgut neuroendocrine tumors (NET). The current study analyzed health-related quality of life (QoL) in patients undergoing PRRT with a special focus on differences in functional performance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In our study, 70 patients (39 men or 31 female) suffering from midgut NET were included, with a mean age of 64.2 years. Functional performance was assessed by the index of the Eastern Cooperative of Oncology Group (ECOG). Thirty-three patients (47%) showed ECOG 0, 31 patients (44%) ECOG 1, and six patients (9%) ECOG 2. Health-related QoL was assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire filled in at baseline and 3 months after each PRRT cycle.

RESULTS

The median cumulative administered activity was 27.4 GBq. Global health status significantly improved compared to baseline status after 1st (p = 0.05), 2nd (p = 0.004), and 3rd (p = 0.04) treatment cycle. Analyzing specific aspects of QoL, emotional functioning significantly improved after 1st and 2nd treatment cycle (both p < 0.001) as well as after 3rd cycle (p = 0.001). With regard to cognitive functioning, there was a significant improvement after 1st and 2nd treatment cycle (p = 0.003 and p = 0.05 respectively). With regard to alleviation of somatic symptoms, a significant reduction in pain and diarrhea was observed after the 2nd cycle (p = 0.038) and 3rd cycle (p = 0.036). Furthermore, changes in QoL in relation to functional performance status as assessed by ECOG were analyzed. There were no significant differences with regard to QoL alterations between patients with high (ECOG 0 or 1) and moderate performance status.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirmed an equally positive effect of PRRT on quality of life in midgut NET patients with high or moderate functional status in terms of increasing global health, functional status, and alleviating symptoms.

Treatments for patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors: a network meta-analysis

Background

It remains unknown which is the most effective regimen among the available therapies for advanced well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). We performed a network meta-analysis to address this important issue.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and major international scientific meetings were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Progression-free survival (PFS) data was the primary outcome of interest, and overall survival (OS) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were the secondary outcomes of interests, reported as hazard ratio (HR), or odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

Included in the meta-analysis were 21 eligible articles reporting 15 RCTs with a total of 2922 patients randomized to receive 11 treatments. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) showed significant PFS advantage over somatostatin analogs (SSA) (HR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.11-0.41), everolimus (HR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.11-0.53), sunitinib (HR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.10-0.82), everolimus+SSA (HR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.12-0.54), and everolimus+bevacizumab (HR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.11-0.82). OS findings were not significantly different between treatments. In terms of treatment rankings of PFS, PRRT had the highest probability (96%) of being the most effective treatment, followed by SSA+bevacizumab (86%) and SSA+interferon-α (IFN-α) (78%). As for toxicity, risk of SAEs was similar between the three treatments. Based on the benefit-risk ratio, PRRT, SSA+bevacizumab, and SSA+IFN-α seemed to be the best, second-, and third-best treatment, respectively.

Conclusions

PRRT is likely to be the most preferable treatment for patients with advanced well-differentiated NETs. SSA+bevacizumab and SSA+IFN-α also seem to be more effective regimens with limited risk of SAEs.

Bone Marrow Absorbed Doses and Correlations with Hematologic Response During 177Lu-DOTATATE Treatments Are Influenced by Image-Based Dosimetry Method and Presence of Skeletal Metastases

This study aimed to compare different image-based methods for bone marrow dosimetry and study the dose–response relationship during treatment with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE in patients with and without skeletal metastases. Methods: This study included 46 patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors treated with at least 2 fractions of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE at Sahlgrenska University Hospital. High- and low-uptake compartments were automatically outlined in planar images collected at 2, 24, 48, and 168 h after injection. The bone marrow absorbed doses were calculated from the cross doses of the high- and low-uptake compartments and the self-dose, using the time–activity concentration curve for the low-uptake compartment. This time–activity concentration curve was adjusted using a fixed constant of 1.8 for the planar dosimetry method and using the activity concentrations in vertebral bodies in SPECT images at 24 h after injection of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE in 4 hybrid methods: L4-SPECT used the activity concentration in the L4 vertebra, whereas V-SPECT, L-SPECT, and T-SPECT used the median activity concentration in all visible vertebrae, lumbar vertebrae, and thoracic vertebrae, respectively. Results: Using the planar method, L4-SPECT, V-SPECT, L-SPECT, and T-SPECT, the estimated median bone marrow absorbed doses were 0.19, 0.36, 0.40, 0.39, and 0.46 Gy/7.4 GBq, respectively, with respective ranges of 0.12–0.33, 0.15–1.44, 0.19–1.71, 0.21–1.60, and 0.18–2.12 Gy/7.4 GBq. For all methods, the bone marrow absorbed dose significantly correlated with decreased platelet counts. This correlation increased after treatment fraction 2: the Spearman correlation (r_s) were −0.49 for the planar method, −0.61 for L4-SPECT, −0.63 for V-SPECT, −0.63 for L-SPECT, and −0.57 for T-SPECT. A separate analysis revealed an increased correlation for patients without skeletal metastases using the planar method (r_s = −0.67). In contrast, hybrid methods had poor correlations for patients without metastases and stronger correlations for patients with skeletal metastases (r_s = −0.61 to −0.74). The mean bone marrow absorbed doses were 3%–69% higher for patients with skeletal metastases than for patients without. Conclusion: The estimated bone marrow absorbed doses by image-based techniques and the correlation with platelets are influenced by the choice of measured vertebrae and the presence of skeletal metastases.

Neuroendocrine Tumor Therapy with Lutetium-177: A Literature Review

The worldwide incidence of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has been increasing. They are a very diverse group of tumors which are commonly found in the gastrointestinal and bronchopulmonary tracts. These tumors usually express somatostatin receptors. Therefore, somatostatin analogs are used for symptom relief as well as treatment. Of the many therapeutic options available, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has been shown to be very promising. In January 2018, the Food Drug and Authority (FDA) approved ¹⁷⁷Lu-Dotatate for use in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). Lutetium is a lower energy beta-emitting radionuclide. The therapeutic use of lutetium-¹⁷⁷ (¹⁷⁷Lu) has shown better results in advanced gastroenteropancreatic and bronchial neuroendocrine tumors when compared with other therapies available. Adverse effects associated with this therapy include myelotoxicity and nephrotoxicity as the radiopeptides are reabsorbed and accumulate in the renal interstitium. Everolimus is a good and safe option in patients pretreated with ¹⁷⁷Lu-Dotatate. Lutetium, in combination with somatostatin analogs, has proven efficacy to treat gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in candidates with somatostatin receptor-positive advanced tumors and normal renal function. This therapy has great potential as it decreases tumor size, improves symptoms, and improves quality of life.

Peptide Receptor Radiotherapy Comes of Age

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy is a form of systemic radiotherapy shown to be effective in treating neuroendocrine tumors expressing somatostatin receptors. The NETTER-1 trial was the first randomized phase III clinical trial evaluating a radiolabeled somatostatin analog, and demonstrated significant improvement in progression-free survival among patients with midgut neuroendocrine tumors treated with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE versus high-dose octreotide. This article discusses the evolution of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, side effects, and potential future treatment approaches.

Twelve-Year Follow-up After Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has been used for more than 20 y as a systemic treatment approach in inoperable or metastatic somatostatin receptor-positive tumors. The purpose of this study was to analyze the long-term outcome of PRRT with regard to the most commonly used radiopharmaceuticals, ⁹⁰Y-DOTATOC and ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE. Methods: This retrospective clinical study included a total of 44 consecutive patients (27 men) with advanced tumors and enhanced somatostatin receptor expression. Mean age at initial diagnosis was 60 y (SD, 11.3 y; range, 40-84 y). Median follow-up was 80 mo. For ¹⁷⁷Lu-PRRT, the mean number of cycles administered was 5.3 ± 2.5 and the mean activity was 27.2 ± 14.9 GBq per patient. For ⁹⁰Y-PRRT, the mean number of cycles administered was 5.5 ± 2.6 and the mean activity was 14.7 ± 7.3 GBq per patient. Overall, 378 cycles were administered (mean, 8.6 ± 3.4 cycles per patient), with an overall cumulative activity of 1,514.1 GBq. Results: Median overall survival was 79 mo. Twenty-one (77.8%) of the 27 men and 9 (52.9%) of the 17 women had died 12 y after commencement of PRRT. The shortest duration of illness was 8 mo and the longest 155 mo. Severe side effects (World Health Organization grades III and IV) were seen in 9 of the 14 patients still alive. Chronic kidney disease in combination with anemia was the most common finding in the 9 patients with severe side effects. A poor prognosis was found for those patients who showed progressive disease, in comparison with patients with cumulative disease control after initial PRRT (log rank, P < 0.001), whereas women and patients with no more than 2 tumor sites seemed to especially benefit from PRRT (not reaching significance levels). Conclusion: PRRT is encouraging in terms of long-term outcome. Thirty-two percent (14/44 patients) of the patients with metastatic or inoperable disease were still alive more than 12 y after the beginning of radionuclide therapy. Possible predictors for favorable outcome are having an initial response to PRRT, having a low number of affected sites, and being female.

Neuropeptide G Protein-Coupled Receptors as Oncotargets

Neuropeptide G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are overexpressed on numerous cancer cells. In a number of tumors, such as small cell lung cancer (SCLC), bombesin (BB) like peptides and neurotensin (NTS) function as autocrine growth factors whereby they are secreted from tumor cells, bind to cell surface receptors and stimulate growth. BB-drug conjugates and BB receptor antagonists inhibit the growth of a number of cancers. Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) increases the secretion rate of BB-like peptide and NTS from SCLC leading to increased proliferation. In contrast, somatostatin (SST) inhibits the secretion of autocrine growth factors from neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and decreases proliferation. SST analogs such as radiolabeled octreotide can be used to localize tumors, is therapeutic for certain cancer patients and has been approved for four different indications in the diagnosis/treatment of NETs. The review will focus on how BB, NTS, VIP, and SST receptors can facilitate the early detection and treatment of cancer.

Correlation of dose with toxicity and tumour response to 90Y- and 177Lu-PRRT provides the basis for optimization through individualized treatment planning

PURPOSE

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with ⁹⁰Y-labelled and ¹⁷⁷Lu-labelled peptides is an effective strategy for the treatment of metastatic/nonresectable neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). Dosimetry provides important information useful for optimizing PRRT with individualized regimens to reduce toxicity and increase tumour responses. However, this strategy is not applied in routine clinical practice, despite the fact that several dosimetric studies have demonstrated significant dose-effect correlations for normal organ toxicity and tumour response that can better guide therapy planning. The present study reviews the key relationships and the radiobiological models available in the literature with the aim of providing evidence that optimization of PRRT is feasible through the implementation of dosimetry.

METHODS

The MEDLINE database was searched combining specific keywords. Original studies published in the English language reporting dose-effect outcomes in patients treated with PRRT were chosen.

RESULTS

Nine of 126 studies were selected from PubMed, and a further five were added manually, reporting on 590 patients. The studies were analysed and are discussed in terms of weak and strong elements of correlations.

CONCLUSION

Several studies provided evidence of clinical benefit from the implementation of dosimetry in PRRT, indicating the potential contribution of this approach to reducing severe toxicity and/or reducing undertreatment that commonly occurs. Prospective trials, possibly multicentre, with larger numbers of patients undergoing quantitative dosimetry and with standardized methodologies should be carried out to definitively provide robust predictive paradigms to establish effective tailored PRRT.

Radiotheranostics in Cancer Diagnosis and Management

The fundamental foundation for precision medicine is accurate and specific targeting of cancer cells. Advances in the understanding of cancer biology, developments in diagnostic technologies, and expansion of therapeutic options have all contributed to the concept of personalized cancer care. Theranostics is the systematic integration of targeted diagnostics and therapeutics. The theranostic platform includes an imaging component that "sees" the lesions followed by administration of the companion therapy agent that "treats" the same lesions. This strategy leads to enhanced therapy efficacy, manageable adverse events, improved patient outcome, and lower overall costs. Radiotheranostics refers to the use of radionuclides for the paired imaging and therapy agents. Radioiodine is the classic radiotheranostic agent that has been used clinically in management of thyroid diseases for nearly 75 years. More recently there have been major exciting strides in radiotheranostics for neuroendocrine tumors and prostate cancer, among other conditions. Regulatory approval of a number of radiotheranostic pairs is anticipated in the near future. Continued support will be needed in research and development to keep pace with the current momentum in radiotheranostics innovations. Moreover, regulatory and reimbursement agencies need to streamline their requirements for seamless transfer of the radiotheranostic agents from the bench to the bedside. In this review, the concept, history, recent developments, current challenges, and outlook for radiotheranostics in the treatment of patients with cancer will be discussed. ^© RSNA, 2018.