The "3M" Approach to Cardiovascular Infections: Multimodality, Multitracers, and Multidisciplinary

Endocarditis in critically ill patients: a review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize the advances in literature that support the best current practices regarding infective endocarditis (IE) in critically ill patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

IE due to rheumatic diseases has decreased significantly, and in fact, the majority of cases are associated with degenerative valvopathies, prosthetic valves, and cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. The Duke criteria were recently updated, addressing the increasing incidence of new risk factors for IE, such as IE associated with the use of endovascular cardiac implantable electronic devices and transcatheter implant valves. The presence of organ dysfunction, renal replacement therapies, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation should be considered in the choice of drug and dosage in critically ill patients with suspected or confirmed IE. As highlighted for other severe infections, monitoring of therapeutic antibiotic levels is a promising technique to improve outcomes in critically ill patients with organ dysfunction.

SUMMARY

The diagnostic investigation of IE must consider the current epidemiological criteria and the diagnostic particularities that these circumstances require. A careful evaluation of these issues is necessary for the prompt clinical or surgical management of this infection.

Radionuclide Imaging of Infective Endocarditis

Infective endocarditis (IE) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis is crucial for adequate patient management. Due to difficulties in the diagnosis, a multidisciplinary discussion in addition to the integration of clinical signs, microbiology data, and imaging data is used. Imaging, including echocardiography, molecular imaging techniques, and coronary CT angiography (CTA) is central to detect infections involving heart valves and implanted cardiovascular devices, also allowing for early detection of septic emboli and metastatic. This article describes the main clinical application of white blood cell SPECT/CT and [¹⁸F]FDG-PET/CT and CTA in IE and infections associated with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices.

Three-dimensional printing in integrated multi-modality imaging approach for management of prosthetic valves infective endocarditis

After heart failure, infectious endocarditis is the second leading cause of death in patients with prosthetic valves. Aortic pseudoaneurysms are a serious complication of infective endocarditis in mechanical or bioprosthetic aortic prostheses. Diagnostic and management challenges are posed by aortic pseudoaneurysms. In these cases, a multi-modality imaging approach with a heart team is recommended. We described two cases of aortic pseudoaneurysms that developed as a result of infective endocarditis. The first case involved a TAVI patient who developed infective endocarditis as a result of diabetic foot complications. Because traditional echocardiography and computed tomography failed to show the anatomy of the lesion, we used 3D printing to show the anatomy, extension of the pseudoaneurysm, and proximity to the right coronary artery. The second case involved a patient who underwent Bentall's surgery with an aortic root and mechanical aortic valve and later developed infective endocarditis complicated by pseudoaneurysms. In this case, 3D printing was used for preoperative surgical planning.

COVID-19 vaccination, implications for PET/CT image interpretation and future perspectives

Introduction

The present paper aims to systematically review the literature on COVID-19 vaccine-related findings in patients undergoing PET/CT.

Methods

The search algorithms included the following combination of terms: “PET” OR “positron emission tomography” AND “COVID”; “PET” OR “positron emission tomography” AND “COVID” AND “vaccination”; “PET” OR “positron emission tomography” AND “COVID”, AND “autoimmune”.

Results

We selected 17 articles which were assessed for quality and included in the systematic analysis. The most frequent vaccine-related signs on PET/CT were the deltoid [¹⁸F]FDG uptake and axillary hypermetabolic lymph nodes, which were described in 8–71% and 7–90% of the patients, respectively. Similarly, frequency of these findings using other tracers than [¹⁸F]FDG was greatly variable. This large variability was related to the variability in time elapsed between vaccination and PET/CT, and the criteria used to define positivity. In addition, vaccine-related findings were detected more frequently in young and immunocompetent patients than in elderly and immunocompromised ones.

Discussion

Therefore, awareness on vaccination status (timing, patient characteristics, and concurrent therapies) and knowledge on patterns of radiopharmaceutical uptake are necessary to properly interpret PET/CT findings.

Alternative Nuclear Imaging Tools for Infection Imaging

Purpose of Review

Cardiovascular infections are serious disease associated with high morbidity and mortality. Their diagnosis is challenging, requiring a proper management for a prompt recognition of the clinical manifestations, and a multidisciplinary approach involving cardiologists, cardiothoracic surgeons, infectious diseases specialist, imagers, and microbiologists. Imaging plays a central role in the diagnostic workout, including molecular imaging techniques. In this setting, two different strategies might be used to image infections: the first is based on the use of agents targeting the microorganism responsible for the infection. Alternatively, we can target the components of the pathophysiological changes of the inflammatory process and/or the host response to the infectious pathogen can be considered. Understanding the strength and limitations of each strategy is crucial to select the most appropriate imaging tool.

Recent Findings

Currently, multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and nuclear imaging (¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography, and leucocyte scintigraphy) are part of the diagnostic strategies. The main role of nuclear medicine imaging (PET/CT and SPECT/CT) is the confirmation of valve/CIED involvement and/or associated perivalvular infection and the detection of distant septic embolism. Proper patients’ preparation, imaging acquisition, and reconstruction as well as imaging reading are crucial to maximize the diagnostic information.

Summary

In this manuscript, we described the use of molecular imaging techniques, in particular WBC imaging, in patients with infective endocarditis, cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections, and infections of composite aortic graft, underlying the strength and limitations of such approached as compared to the other imaging modalities.

Nuclear Imaging in Infective Endocarditis

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a life-threatening disease with stable prevalence despite prophylactic, diagnostic, and therapeutic advances. In parallel to the growing number of cardiac devices implanted, the number of patients developing IE on prosthetic valves and cardiac implanted electronic device (CIED) is increasing at a rapid pace. The diagnosis of IE is particularly challenging, and currently relies on the Duke-Li modified classification, which include clinical, microbiological, and imaging criteria. While echocardiography remains the first line imaging technique, especially in native valve endocarditis, the incremental value of two nuclear imaging techniques, ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT) and white blood cells single photon emission tomography with computed tomography (WBC-SPECT), has emerged for the management of prosthetic valve and CIED IE. In this review, we will summarize the procedures for image acquisition, discuss the role of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT and WBC-SPECT imaging in different clinical situations of IE, and review the respective diagnostic performance of these nuclear imaging techniques and their integration into the diagnostic algorithm for patients with a suspicion of IE.

Role of Multimodal Imaging in Patients With Suspected Infections After the Bentall Procedure

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performances of multimodal imaging [i.e., white blood cell single-photon emission computed tomography/CT (^99mTc-HMPAO-WBC SPECT/CT) and 18-fluoride-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT ([¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT)] in patients with suspected infection after the Bentall procedure, proposing new specific diagnostic criteria for the diagnosis.

Methods: Between January 2009 and December 2019, we selected within a cardiovascular infections registry, 76 surgically treated patients (27 women and 49 men, median 66 years, and range 29–83 years). All the patients underwent molecular imaging for a suspected infection after the replacement of the aortic valve and ascending aorta according to the Bentall procedure. We analyzed 98 scans including 49 ^99mTc-WBC and 49 [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT. A total of 22 patients with very early/early suspected infection (<3 months after surgery) were imaged with both the techniques. Positive imaging was classified according to the anatomical site of increased uptake: to the aortic valve (AV), to both the AV and AV tube graft (AVTG) or to the TG, to surrounding tissue, and/or to extracardiac sites (embolic events or other sites of concomitant infection). Standard clinical workup included in all the patients having echocardiography/CT, blood culture, and the Duke criteria. Pretest probability and positive/negative likelihood ratio were calculated. Sensitivity and specificity of ^99mTc labeled hexamethylpropylene amine oxime-WBC SPECT/CT (^99mTc-HMPAO-WBC SPECT/CT) and [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT imaging were calculated by using microbiology (n = 35) or clinical follow-up (n = 41) as final diagnosis. ^99mTc-HMPAO-WBC scintigraphy and [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT findings were compared with 95% CIs by using the McNemar test to those of echocardiography/CT, blood culture, and the Duke criteria.

Results: Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of ^99mTc-HMPAO-WBC were 86, 92, and 88%, respectively, with a slightly higher sensitivity for tube graft infection (TGI) as compared to isolated AV and combined AVTG. Overall, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT were 97, 73, and 90%, respectively. In 22 patients with suspected very early and early postsurgical infections, the two imaging modalities were concordant in 17 cases [10 true positive (TP) and 7 true negative (TN)]. [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT presented a higher sensitivity than ^99mTc-HMPAO-WBC scan. ^99mTc-HMPAO-WBC scan correctly classified as negative three false-positive (FP) PET/CT findings.

Conclusion: Our findings supported the use of ^99mTc-HMPAO-WBC SPECT/CT and [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT in patients with suspicion infection after the Bentall procedure early in the course of the disease onset to confirm the diagnosis and provide a comprehensive assessment of disease burden through the proposed criteria.

Adherence to diagnostic and therapeutic practice guidelines for suspected cardiac implantable electronic device infections

BACKGROUND

Despite guidelines describing the optimal diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for patients with suspected cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections, their management is often challenging.

AIMS

To describe our diagnostic and therapeutic practices for suspected CIED infection, and to compare them with European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) guidelines.

METHODS

Patients hospitalized in the tertiary care Nancy University Hospital for suspected CIED infection from 2014 to 2019 were included retrospectively. We applied the EHRA classification of CIED infection, and compared diagnostic and therapeutic management with the EHRA guidelines.

RESULTS

Among 184 patients (mean age 72.3±12.4 years), 137 had a proven infection of the lead (by transthoracic echocardiography/transoesophageal echocardiography, ¹⁸F-fluorodesoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography or positive culture of the lead) or an isolated pocket infection without proof of lead infection, and 47 had no proof of CIED infection. According to the EHRA classification, CIED infection was considered as definite in 145 patients and possible in 31 and was excluded in eight patients. Regarding recommended diagnostic procedures, blood cultures were performed in 90.8%, transthoracic echocardiography in 97.8%, transoesophageal echocardiography in 85.9%, ¹⁸F-fluorodesoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in 50.5% and imaging for embolisms in 78.3% of the patients. Compared with therapeutic recommendations for the 145 cases of definite CIED infection, device removal was performed in 96 patients (66.2%) and antibiotic therapy was prescribed in 130 (89.7%), with a duration equal to or longer than that recommended in 105 (72.4%) of the patients.

CONCLUSION

This study underlines the difficulties in following theoretical guidelines in daily practice, where both technical and human considerations interfere with their strict appliance.

European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) international consensus document on how to prevent, diagnose, and treat cardiac implantable electronic device infections-endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS), International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (ISCVID) and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)

Pacemakers, implantable cardiac defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices are potentially life-saving treatments for a number of cardiac conditions, but are not without risk. Most concerning is the risk of a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection, which is associated with significant morbidity, increased hospitalizations, reduced survival, and increased healthcare costs. Recommended preventive strategies such as administration of intravenous antibiotics before implantation are well recognized. Uncertainties have remained about the role of various preventive, diagnostic, and treatment measures such as skin antiseptics, pocket antibiotic solutions, anti-bacterial envelopes, prolonged antibiotics post-implantation, and others. Guidance on whether to use novel device alternatives expected to be less prone to infections and novel oral anticoagulants is also limited, as are definitions on minimum quality requirements for centres and operators and volumes. Moreover, an international consensus document on management of CIED infections is lacking. The recognition of these issues, the dissemination of results from important randomized trials focusing on prevention of CIED infections, and observed divergences in managing device-related infections as found in an European Heart Rhythm Association worldwide survey, provided a strong incentive for a 2019 International State-of-the-art Consensus document on risk assessment, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of CIED infections.

European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) international consensus document on how to prevent, diagnose, and treat cardiac implantable electronic device infections-endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS), International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (ISCVID) and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)

Pacemakers, implantable cardiac defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices are potentially life-saving treatments for a number of cardiac conditions, but are not without risk. Most concerning is the risk of a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection, which is associated with significant morbidity, increased hospitalizations, reduced survival, and increased healthcare costs. Recommended preventive strategies such as administration of intravenous antibiotics before implantation are well recognized. Uncertainties have remained about the role of various preventive, diagnostic, and treatment measures such as skin antiseptics, pocket antibiotic solutions, anti-bacterial envelopes, prolonged antibiotics post-implantation, and others. Guidance on whether to use novel device alternatives expected to be less prone to infections and novel oral anticoagulants is also limited, as are definitions on minimum quality requirements for centres and operators and volumes. Moreover, an international consensus document on management of CIED infections is lacking. The recognition of these issues, the dissemination of results from important randomized trials focusing on prevention of CIED infections, and observed divergences in managing device-related infections as found in an European Heart Rhythm Association worldwide survey, provided a strong incentive for a 2019 International State-of-the-art Consensus document on risk assessment, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of CIED infections.

European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) international consensus document on how to prevent, diagnose, and treat cardiac implantable electronic device infections-endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS), International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (ISCVID), and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)

Pacemakers, implantable cardiac defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices are potentially lifesaving treatments for a number of cardiac conditions but are not without risk. Most concerning is the risk of a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection, which is associated with significant morbidity, increased hospitalizations, reduced survival, and increased health care costs. Recommended preventive strategies such as administration of intravenous antibiotics before implantation are well-recognized. Uncertainties have remained about the role of various preventive, diagnostic, and treatment measures such as skin antiseptics, pocket antibiotic solutions, antibacterial envelopes, prolonged antibiotics post-implantation, and others. When compared with previous guidelines or consensus statements, the present consensus document gives guidance on the use of novel device alternatives, novel oral anticoagulants, antibacterial envelopes, prolonged antibiotics post-implantation, as well as definitions on minimum quality requirements for centres and operators and volumes. The recognition that an international consensus document focused on management of CIED infections is lacking, the dissemination of results from new important randomized trials focusing on prevention of CIED infections, and observed divergences in managing device-related infections as found in an European Heart Rhythm Association worldwide survey, provided a strong incentive for a Novel 2019 International State-of-the-art Consensus document on risk assessment, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of CIED infections.

Distributed learning: a reliable privacy-preserving strategy to change multicenter collaborations using AI

Purpose

The present scoping review aims to assess the non-inferiority of distributed learning over centrally and locally trained machine learning (ML) models in medical applications.

Methods

We performed a literature search using the term “distributed learning” OR “federated learning” in the PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. No start date limit was used, and the search was extended until July 21, 2020. We excluded articles outside the field of interest; guidelines or expert opinion, review articles and meta-analyses, editorials, letters or commentaries, and conference abstracts; articles not in the English language; and studies not using medical data. Selected studies were classified and analysed according to their aim(s).

Results

We included 26 papers aimed at predicting one or more outcomes: namely risk, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment side effect/adverse drug reaction. Distributed learning was compared to centralized or localized training in 21/26 and 14/26 selected papers, respectively. Regardless of the aim, the type of input, the method, and the classifier, distributed learning performed close to centralized training, but two experiments focused on diagnosis. In all but 2 cases, distributed learning outperformed locally trained models.

Conclusion

Distributed learning resulted in a reliable strategy for model development; indeed, it performed equally to models trained on centralized datasets. Sensitive data can get preserved since they are not shared for model development. Distributed learning constitutes a promising solution for ML-based research and practice since large, diverse datasets are crucial for success.

Clinical practice and implementation of guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis and management of cardiac implantable electronic device infections: results of a worldwide survey under the auspices of the European Heart Rhythm Association

AIMS

Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection rates are increasing. Worldwide compliance and disparities to published guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis and management of these conditions are not well elucidated. The purpose of this survey, therefore, was to clarify these issues through an inquiry to arrhythmia-related associations and societies worldwide.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A questionnaire comprising 15 questions related to CIED infections was distributed among members of seven arrhythmia societies worldwide. A total of 234 centres in 62 countries reported implantation rates of which 159 (68.0%) performed more than 200 device implantations per year and 14 (6.0%) performed fewer than 50 implantations per year. The reported rates of CIED infections for 2017 were ≤2% in 78.7% of the centres, while the infection rates exceeded 5% in 7.8% of the centres. Preventive measures for CIED infection differed from published recommendations and varied among different regions mainly in terms of pocket irrigation and administering post-operative antimicrobial therapy the use of which was reported by 39.9% and 44% of the respondents, respectively. Antibacterial envelopes were used by 37.7% of the respondents in selected circumstances. In terms of pocket infection management, 62% of the respondents applied complete system removal as an initial step. Diagnostic pocket needle aspiration and pocket surgical debridement were reported by 15.8% and 11.8% of centres, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Clinical practices for prevention and management of CIED do not fully comply with current recommendations and demonstrate considerable regional disparities. Further education and programmes for improved implementation of guidelines are mandatory.

Multimodality Imaging in the Diagnostic Work-Up of Endocarditis and Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED) Infection

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a serious cardiac condition, which includes a wide range of clinical presentations, with varying degrees of severity. The diagnosis is multifactorial and a proper characterization of disease requires the identification of the primary site of infection (usually the cardiac valve) and the search of secondary systemic complications. Early depiction of local complications or distant embolization has a great impact on patient management and prognosis, as it may induce to aggressive antibiotic treatment or, in more advanced cases, cardiac surgery. In this setting, the multimodality imaging has assumed a pivotal role in the clinical decision making and it requires the physician to be aware of the advantages and disadvantages of each imaging technique. Echocardiography is the first imaging test, but it has several limitations. Therefore, the integration with other imaging modalities (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear imaging) becomes often necessary. Different strategies should be applied depending on whether the infection is suspected or already ascertained, whether located in native or prosthetic valves, in the left or right chambers, or if it involves an implanted cardiac device. In addition, detection of extracardiac IE-related lesions is crucial for a correct management and treatment. The aim of this review is to illustrate strengths and weaknesses of the various methods in the most common clinical scenarios.

Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for the treatment of pacemaker pocket infection in patients unable or unwilling to undergo CIED extraction

PURPOSE

The occurrence of cardiac pacemaker pocket infection has markedly increased and has become a new problem facing cardiovascular internists. The aim of our study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of treating cardiac pacemaker pocket infection using negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in patients who are unwilling or unable to have their cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) removed.

METHODS

From March 2013 to April 2019, NPWT was applied to 26 patients with cardiac pacemaker pocket infection who were unwilling or unable to have their CIEDs removed. In the first stage, a negative-pressure drainage system was placed in the pacemaker pocket after debridement. Then, NPWT was used to seal the wound, and the negative pressure (300-400 mmHg) was sustained for 5-7 days. In the second stage, the pacemaker was relocated to the subpectoral layer, and the wound was closed.

RESULTS

In all but three of our 26 patients, the wound healed completely without complications and without evidence of residual infection. The average follow-up period was 26.92 ± 9.46 months. Only 3 diabetic patients whose tissue bacterial cultures revealed that methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis developed uncontrolled infections. Eventually, the entire original pacemaker systems were removed, and new pacemakers were implanted in the contralateral chest wall.

CONCLUSIONS

When warranted by strictly selected indications, the method of NPWT without CIED extraction can be considered as a new and effective treatment for patients with pacemaker pocket infection who are unwilling or unable to have the device removed.

Multimodality Imaging in Infective Endocarditis: An Imaging Team Within the Endocarditis Team

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a complex disease with cardiac involvement and multiorgan complications. Its prognosis depends on prompt diagnosis that leads to an aggressive therapeutic management combining antibiotic therapy and early cardiac surgery when indicated. However, IE diagnosis always poses a challenge, and echocardiography remains diagnostically imperfect in cases of prosthetic valve IE or cardiac implantable electronic device infection. In recent years, other imaging modalities (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear imaging) have experienced significant technical improvements, and their application to the detection of cardiac and extracardiac IE-related lesions seems to be a strategic way forward in the management of patients with suspected IE. However, the scientific evidence in the literature remains limited; current guidelines address the use of the multimodality imaging in the field of IE with caution; the incremental value of each technique and their combinations is debated; and their use varies across countries. Despite these limitations, healthcare providers and surgeons should be aware of the possibilities offered by the multimodal imaging approach when appropriate. Here, we emphasize the value of a multidisciplinary heart valve team, the endocarditis team, underlining the importance of cardiac and extracardiac imaging experts in playing a key role in informing the diagnosis and management of patients with IE. Illustrative cases, critical appraisal of contemporary data, and conceptual and practical suggestions for clinicians that may help to improve the prognosis of patients with IE are provided in this review article.

Quantitative imaging biomarkers in nuclear medicine: from SUV to image mining studies. Highlights from annals of nuclear medicine 2018

OBJECTIVE

Quantification in medical imaging is one of the main goals in research and clinical practice since it allows immediate understanding, objective communication, and comparison. Our aim was to summarize relevant investigations on quantification in nuclear medicine studies published in the volume 32 of Annals of Nuclear Medicine.

METHODS

In this article, we summarized the data of 14 selected papers from international research groups that were published between January and December 2018. This is a descriptive review with an inherently subjective selection of articles.

RESULTS

We discussed the role of parameters ranging from standardized uptake value to ratios, to flow within a region of interest, to volumetric parameters and to texture indices in different clinical scenarios in oncology, cardiology, and neurology.

CONCLUSIONS

In all the medical disciplines in which nuclear medicine examinations play a role, quantification is essential both in research and in clinical practice. Standardization and high-quality protocols are crucial for the success and reliability of imaging biomarkers.

Molecular Imaging of Infection: The First 50 Years

Despite significant advances in the understanding of microorganisms and an increased availability of antimicrobial therapy, infection remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality. The diagnosis can be challenging and imaging studies often are used for confirmation and localization. For nearly 50 years, molecular imaging agents have played an important role in the diagnosis of infection. Gallium-67 citrate was perhaps the first molecular imaging agent used for diagnosing and localizing infection. Poor imaging characteristics, along with a lack of specificity, and the long (usually 48-72 hours) interval between administration and imaging motivated investigators to search for alternatives. Currently the role of ⁶⁷Ga is limited to differentiating acute tubular necrosis from interstitial nephritis and as an alternative to ¹⁸F-FDG for indications, such as sarcoid, spondylodiscitis, and fever of unknown origin, when the latter is not available. The development, in the mid-1970s, of techniques for radiolabeling leukocytes that subsequently migrate to foci of infection was a significant advance and labeled leukocyte imaging still has a preeminent role in molecular imaging of infection. There are significant disadvantages to in-vitro labeled leukocyte imaging. Efforts devoted to developing in-vivo leukocyte labeling methods, however, met with only limited success. Over the past 20 years ¹⁸F-FDG has established itself as the molecular imaging agent of choice for fever of unknown origin, vasculitis, sarcoid, and spondylodiscitis. As useful as these agents are, their uptake is based on the host response to infection, not infection itself. Previous attempts at developing infection specific agents, including radiolabeled antibiotics, antibiotics, and vitamins like biotin were limited by poor results and/or limited availability and so investigators continue to focus on developing infection specific molecular imaging agents. Initial results with radiolabeled nucleoside analogs, sugars, and amino acids, and a renewed interest in radiolabeled antibiotics for both diagnosis and monitoring treatment are exciting and hold great promise for the future.

The role of 99mTc-HMPAO-labelled white blood cell scintigraphy in the diagnosis of cardiac device-related infective endocarditis

Aims

The hybrid technique of single-photon emission tomography and computed tomography with technetium99m-hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime–labelled leucocytes (99mTc-HMPAO-SPECT/CT) is an emerging diagnostic technique in patients with cardiac device-related infective endocarditis (CDRIE). This prospective study assessed the 99mTc-HMPAO-SPECT/CT diagnostic profile and its added value to the modified Duke criteria (mDuke) in CDRIE diagnostic work-up.

Methods and results

The study examined 103 consecutive patients with suspected CDRIE, who underwent 99mTc-HMPAO-SPECT/CT. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated based on a final clinical CDRIE diagnosis, including microbiology, echocardiography, and a 6-month follow-up. Subsequently, we compared the diagnostic value of the initial mDuke classification with a classification including 99mTc-HMPAO-SPECT/CT positive results as an additional major CDRIE criterion: mDuke-SPECT/CT.

Overall, CDRIE was diagnosed in 31 (31%) patients, whereas 35 (34%) 99mTc-HMPAO-SPECT/CT were positive. 99mTc-HMPAO-SPECT/CT was characterized by 86% accuracy, 0.69 Cohen’s kappa coefficient, 84% sensitivity, 88% specificity, 93% negative, and 74% positive predictive values. The original mDuke displayed 83% accuracy, 0.52 kappa, whereas mDuke-SPECT/CT had 88% accuracy, and 0.73 kappa. Compared with mDuke, mDuke-SPECT/CT showed significantly higher sensitivity (87% vs. 48%, P &lt; 0.001). According to mDuke, 49.5% of patients had possible CDRIE, and after reclassification, that figure dropped to 37%. Furthermore, having assessed the diagnosis categorization improvement following the incorporation of 99mTc-HMPAO-SPECT/CT, the net reclassification index value was found to be 31.4%.

Conclusion

In patients with CDRIE, 99mTc-HMPAO-SPECT/CT provides high diagnostic accuracy, whereas a negative scan excludes CDRIE with high probability. Inclusion of 99mTc-HMPAO-SPECT/CT into mDuke diagnostic criteria yields significantly higher sensitivity and a reduction in possible CDRIE diagnoses.

PET/CT Imaging in Soft Tissue Infection and Inflammation-An Update

Nuclear medicine procedures, including Ga-67 and labeled leucocyte SPECT/CT as well as PET/CT using 18F-FDG and recently Ga-68 tracers, have found extensive applications in the assessment of infectious and inflammatory processes in general and in soft tissues in particular. Recent published data focus on summarizing the available imaging information with the purpose of providing the referring clinicians with optimized evidence based results. Guidelines and/or recommendations of clinical societies have incorporated nuclear medicine tests (using both labeled leucocytes and FDG) in their suggested work-up for evaluation of infective endocarditis and in certain patients with suspected vascular graft infections. Joint guidelines of the European and American nuclear medicine societies include fever of unknown origin, sarcoidosis, and vasculitis among the major clinical indications that will benefit from nuclear medicine procedures, specifically from FDG PET/CT. Limitations and pitfalls for the use of radiotracers in assessment of infection and inflammation can be related to patient conditions (eg, diabetes mellitus), or to the biodistribution of a specific radiopharmaceutical. Limited presently available data on the use of functional and/or metabolic monitoring of response to infectious and inflammatory processes to treatment and with respect to the effect of drugs such as antibiotics and glucocorticoids on the imaging patterns of these patients need further confirmation.

Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in establishing new clinical and therapeutic modalities in lung cancer. A short review

Lung cancer is a fairly common malignancy. An early diagnosis and a reliable staging and re-staging with the aim to detect both local and distant relapse are of utmost importance in planning the therapeutic management. The imaging diagnostic work-up of patients with lung cancer usually includes conventional imaging (chest X-ray, contrast-enhanced CT, bone scan) and more recently ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT. Great advances in the management of lung cancer are based on the information provided by ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, as it supplies both metabolic and anatomic information (better localisation). There is vast evidence in the literature demonstrating its utility in (a) characterising benign versus malignant solitary nodules, (b) staging and re-staging lung cancer, (c) guiding the type of therapy, (d) monitoring treatment response and (e) predicting outcome. In particular, given its specificity in differentiating ¹⁸F-FDG-avid relapse from post-surgical changes or post-radiation fibrosis (which do not take up ¹⁸F-FDG), PET/CT can detect recurrent disease after initial treatment and (being a whole-body technique) has demonstrated high accuracy in the detection of distant metastases or secondary tumours. In conclusion, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT can be considered a highly accurate and reliable method for staging and re-staging lung cancer, and is highly effective in guiding personalised therapies.

18F-FDG-Labeled Autologous Leukocyte PET-CT in a Patient With Aortic Valve-Tube Graft Infection After Bentall Procedure

Infection of aortic valve-tube graft, although rare, is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Early identification of site and extent of infection is not only challenging but also crucial for adequate patient management and prognostication of disease. Combined clinical, laboratory investigation and imaging modalities assist in the identification of aortic valve graft infection. Molecular imaging techniques like PET/CT using F-FDG and F-FDG-labeled autologous leukocytes (LALs) have improved the sensitivity for detection of infection, resulting in better outcome for these patients. F-FDG-labeled autologous leukocyte PET/CT in our patient after Bentall procedure accurately localized the site and extent of infection.

Ruptured Mycotic Aneurysm After Intravesical Instillation for Bladder Tumor

BACKGROUND

Intravesical instillation of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) is an effective and widely used treatment for patients with in situ bladder cancer. Major complications are quite uncommon, but a systemic dissemination of the attenuated strain of Mycobacterium bovis is possible. Few cases of aortic rupture caused by M bovis infection are described in literature.

METHODS

A 70-year-old male, treated 3 months before with BCG instillation, presented to the emergency department because of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. The patient was hemodynamically stable, with a "hostile" abdomen. Therefore, an Endologix AFX endograft was deployed. During the postoperative period, his blood inflammatory markers increased, suspicious of a graft infection. Single-photon emission computed tomography (CT)/CT scan showed aortic increased uptake. Antibiotic therapy was continued, but after some days, the patient presented with hematemesis, and the CT scan showed an aortoenteric fistula. In emergency, the infected graft and aneurysm were removed, enteric fistula was closed, and an axillobifemoral bypass was performed. The patient died 25 days after endovascular aneurysm repair explantation.

RESULTS

Despite the high suspicion of mycotic aortic aneurysm and graft infection by M bovis, there is no proof of this theory because of the absence of any positive culture test. M bovis is a slow-growing bacteria, and specific culture tests are required to identify it; indeed, all our blood and intraoperative samples were positive to other bacteria, probably the contaminant ones.

CONCLUSIONS

Mycotic aneurysm is an extremely rare complication of intravesical BCG therapy, but it must be taken into consideration in patients with rapidly growing aortic aneurysms or rupture of a normal aorta, who have been previously submitted to this kind of instillation.