First In Vivo Experience With Biventricular Circulatory Assistance Using a Single Continuous Flow Pump

Cleveland Clinic Continuous-Flow Total Artificial Heart: Progress Report and Technology Update

Cleveland Clinic's continuous-flow total artificial heart (CFTAH) is being developed at our institution and has demonstrated system reliability and optimal performance. Based on the results from recent chronic in vivo experiments, CFTAH has been revised, especially to improve biocompatibility. The purpose of this article is to report our progress in developing CFTAH. To improve biocompatibility, the right impeller, the pump housing, and the motor were reviewed for design revision. Updated design features were based on computational fluid dynamics analysis and observations from in vitro and in vivo studies. A new version of CFTAH was created, manufactured, and tested. All hemodynamic and pump-related parameters were observed and found to be within the intended ranges, and the new CFTAH yielded acceptable biocompatibility. Cleveland Clinic's continuous-flow total artificial heart has demonstrated reliable performance, and has shown satisfactory progress in its development.

Biventricular circulatory support using single-device and dual-device configurations: Initial pump characterization in simulated heart failure model

Objective

Severe biventricular heart failure (BHF) can be remedied using a biventricular assist device (BVAD). Two devices are currently in development: a universal ventricular assist device (UVAD), which will be able to assist either the left, right, or both ventricles, and a continuous-flow total artificial heart (CFTAH), which replaces the entire heart. In this study, the in vitro hemodynamic performances of two UVADs are compared to a CFTAH acting as a BVAD.

Methods

For this experiment, a biventricular mock circulatory loop utilizes two pneumatic pumps (Abiomed AB5000™, Danvers, MA, USA), in conjunction with a dual-output driver, to create heart failure (HF) conditions (left, LHF; right, RHF; biventricular, BHF). Systolic BHF for four different situations were replicated. In each situation, CFTAH and UVAD devices were installed and operated at two distinct speeds, and cannulations for ventricular and atrial connections were evaluated.

Results

Both CFTAH and UVAD setups achieved our recommended hemodynamic criteria. The dual-UVAD arrangement yielded a better atrial balance to alleviate LHF and RHF. For moderate and severe BHF scenarios, CFTAH and dual UVADs both created excellent atrial pressure balance. Conversely, when CFTAH was atrial cannulated for LHF and RHF, the needed atrial pressure balance was not met.

Conclusion

Comprehensive in vitro testing of two different BVAD setups exhibited self-regulation and exceptional pump performance for both (single- and dual-device) BHF support scenarios. For treating moderate and severe BHF, UVAD and CFTAH both functioned well with respect to atrial pressure regulation and cardiac output. Though, the dual-UVAD setup yielded a better atrial pressure balance in all BHF testing scenarios.

Evaluation of Centrifugal Blood Pump Performances for Biventricular Support in Virtual Simulation Model

BACKGROUND

Despite the advances in the left ventricular assist device (LVAD), there are still situations that require a biventricular assist device (BVAD) system. The purpose of this study was to explore and compare the system performance interactions with the HeartMate3 (HM3) and HeartWare (HVAD) in a BVAD configuration using the virtual mock loop (VML) simulation tool.

METHODS

The VML simulation tool is an in silico implementation of a lumped parameter model of the cardiovascular system with mechanical circulatory support. Patients with ejection fractions of 60%, 20%, and 15% were simulated in VML, and the HVAD and HM3 in a BVAD with ventricular cannulation were applied to simulated conditions. Pump speeds that restored baseline normal hemodynamics were determined. To determine the optimal speeds for BVAD, the left and right arterial pressures (LAP, RAP) were plotted.

RESULTS

In the HVAD, LAP and RAP balanced at 11 mm Hg with LVAD 3,500 rpm, right ventricular assist device (RVAD) 2,200 rpm; at 13 mm Hg with LVAD 3,000 rpm, RVAD 1,700 rpm; and at 14 mm Hg with LVAD 2,500 rpm, RVAD 1,300 rpm. For the HM3, at 8 mm Hg with LVAD 7,000 rpm, RVAD 5,000 rpm; at 9 mm Hg with LVAD 6,000 rpm, RVAD 4,300 rpm; and at 9.5 mm Hg with LVAD 5,000 rpm, RVAD 3,500 rpm.

CONCLUSION

The RVAD/LVAD speed ratios required for atrial balance were approximately 0.6 for the HVAD and 0.7 for the HM3. However, the HVAD required RVAD speeds below its range of operation.