Recurrent autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation-when non-self becomes self

Post-Transplant Immunosuppression in Autoimmune Liver Disease

Autoimmune liver diseases (AILDs) are a group of conditions where immune-mediated liver damage can lead to the need for transplantation. Collectively, they account for almost a quarter of all liver transplants. Outcomes in terms of graft and patient survival for all liver transplants have improved markedly over decades with improvements in patient selection, surgical techniques and longer-term care and this is also seen in patients with AILDs. The current five- and ten-year survival rates post-transplant in autoimmune disease are excellent, at 88% and 78%, respectively. A key factor in maintaining good outcomes post liver transplant for these autoimmune conditions is the immunosuppression strategy. These patients have increased the rates of rejection, and autoimmune conditions can all recur in the graft ranging from 12 to 60% depending on the population studied. Immunosuppressive regimens are centred on calcineurin inhibitors, often combined with low dose corticosteroids, with or without the addition of antimetabolite therapy. There is no clear evidence-based immunosuppressive regimen for these conditions, and a tailored approach balancing the individuals' immunological profile against the risks of immunosuppression is often used. There are disease-specific considerations to optimised graft function including the role of ursodeoxycholic acid in both primary biliary cholangitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis and the role and timing of colectomy in primary sclerosing cholangitis in inflammatory bowel disease patients. However, unmet needs still exist in the management of AILDs post liver transplantation particularly in building the evidence base for optimal immunosuppression as well as mitigating the risk of recurrent disease.

Elevated Liver Enzymes in Asymptomatic Patients - What Should I Do?

Elevated liver enzymes are a common scenario encountered by physicians in clinical practice. For many physicians, however, evaluation of such a problem in patients presenting with no symptoms can be challenging. Evidence supporting a standardized approach to evaluation is lacking. Although alterations of liver enzymes could be a normal physiological phenomenon in certain cases, it may also reflect potential liver injury in others, necessitating its further assessment and management. In this article, we provide a guide to primary care clinicians to interpret abnormal elevation of liver enzymes in asymptomatic patients using a step-wise algorithm. Adopting a schematic approach that classifies enzyme alterations on the basis of pattern (hepatocellular, cholestatic and isolated hyperbilirubinemia), we review an approach to abnormal alteration of liver enzymes within each section, the most common causes of enzyme alteration, and suggest initial investigations.

Systematic review: recurrent autoimmune liver diseases after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune liver diseases (AILD) constitute the third most common indication for liver transplantation (LT) worldwide. Outcomes post LT are generally good but recurrent disease is frequently observed.

AIMS

To describe the frequency and risk factors associated with recurrent AILD post-LT and provide recommendations to reduce the incidence of recurrence based on levels of evidence.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed for full-text papers published in English-language journals, using the keywords 'autoimmune hepatitis (AIH)', 'primary biliary cholangitis and/or cirrhosis (PBC)', 'primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC)', 'liver transplantation' and 'recurrent disease'. Management strategies to reduce recurrence after LT were classified according to grade and level of evidence.

RESULTS

Survival rates post-LT are approximately 90% and 70% at 1 and 5 years and recurrent disease occurs in a range of 10-50% of patients with AILD. Recurrent AIH is associated with elevated liver enzymes and IgG before LT, lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates in the explants and lack of steroids after LT (Grade B). Tacrolimus use is associated with increased risk; use of ciclosporin and preventive ursodeoxycholic acid with reduced risk of PBC recurrence (all Grade B). Intact colon, active ulcerative colitis and early cholestasis are associated with recurrent PSC (Grade B).

CONCLUSIONS

Recommendations based on grade A level of evidence are lacking. The need for further study and management includes active immunosuppression before liver transplantation and steroid use after liver transplantation in autoimmune hepatitis; selective immunosuppression with ciclosporin and preventive ursodeoxycholic acid treatment for primary biliary cholangitis; and improved control of inflammatory bowel disease or even colectomy in primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Recurrence of nonviral liver diseases after liver transplantation

Many nonviral diseases that cause liver failure may recur after liver transplantation. Although most studies have shown that a recurrent disease does not negatively affect patient and graft survival in the intermediate postoperative course, there is growing evidence that, especially in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and in patients with recurrent abusive alcohol drinking, disease recurrence is a significant risk factor for graft dysfunction and graft loss. Therefore, the recurrence of nonviral diseases has become a clinically important and prognostically relevant issue in the long-term management of recipients of liver transplantation.

Possible benefit of splenectomy in liver transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis

Liver transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is usually successful with excellent long-term outcomes, but primary disease may recur. The recurrence of AIH is a significant cause of graft loss. This study was to analyze the effect of splenectomy in preventing AIH relapse. The clinical courses of 12 patients who had transplantation for AIH were analyzed retrospectively. All patients were subjected to transplantation for end-stage liver disease caused by chronic AIH. Based on the duration of immunosuppressive treatment before liver transplantation, simultaneous splenectomy was performed in ten patients. Two patients underwent liver transplantation without splenectomy, one of them developed recurrent AIH and died from graft failure caused by AIH relapse. However, no episode of AIH recurrence was observed in patients who had undergone simultaneous splenectomy. Splenectomy might be an option to prevent AIH relapse in some patients with high risk factors.

Hepatitis C virus infection in HIV-infected patients

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a spherical enveloped RNA virus of the Flaviviridae family, classified within the Hepacivirus genus. Since its discovery in 1989, HCV has been recognized as a major cause of chronic hepatitis and hepatic fibrosis that progresses in some patients to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. In the United States, approximately 4 million people have been infected with HCV, and 10,000 HCVrelated deaths occur each year. Due to shared routes of transmission, HCV and HIV co-infection are common, affecting approximately one third of all HIV-infected persons in the United States. In addition, HIV co-infection is associated with higher HCV RNA viral load and a more rapid progression of HCV-related liver disease, leading to an increased risk of cirrhosis. HCV infection may also impact the course and management of HIV disease, particularly by increasing the risk of antiretroviral drug-induced hepatotoxicity. Thus, chronic HCV infection acts as an opportunistic disease in HIV-infected persons because the incidence of infection is increased and the natural history of HCV infection is accelerated in co-infected persons. Strategies to prevent primary HCV infection and to modify the progression of HCV-related liver disease are urgently needed among HIV/HCV co-infected individuals.

Liver transplantation and autoimmune liver diseases

Liver transplantation (LT) is an effective treatment for patients with end-stage autoimmune liver diseases such as primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and autoimmune hepatitis. Indications for LT for these diseases do not differ substantially from those used for other acute or chronic liver diseases. Despite the good outcomes reported, the recurrence of autoimmune liver disease is relatively common in the allograft. In addition, it has become apparent that autoimmunity and autoimmune liver disease can arise de novo after transplantation for nonautoimmune liver disorders. An awareness of the existence of recurrent autoimmune liver diseases and de novo autoimmune hepatitis after LT has important clinical implications because their management differs from the standard antirejection treatment and is similar to the management of classic autoimmune liver diseases in the native liver.

Autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) was the first chronic liver disease in which remission was achieved by immunosuppression. Prognosis is poor when left untreated. Since the original description in 1950 by Waldenström, the initially reported treatment option has remained until today and is the core of the basic therapeutic strategy of inducing remission with steroids and azathioprine. Immunosuppression as a treatment concept spans different situations including the induction and maintenance of remission, treatment of nonresponders, avoidance of side effects, perioperative treatment of liver transplantation candidates and the issue of withdrawal. Alternative immunosuppressive drugs such as transplantation immunosuppressants have been administered and reported in small series. In an attempt to optimize side effect management, a recent large multicenter prospective treatment trial suggests that budesonide may offer an alternative for noncirrhotic AIH patients with lower steroid side effects. With an early diagnosis and effective therapy, only 4% of transplant candidates are transplanted for AIH. After liver transplantation there is a considerable risk for graft loss because of recurrent AIH, and lifelong vigilance and therapeutic attention is important.

Recurrence of autoimmune liver diseases after liver transplantation: clinical aspects

Autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis are autoimmune liver diseases characterized by progressive immune-mediated inflammation leading to the destruction of the hepatocytes and the biliary epithelial cells, and eventually to cirrhosis and liver failure. The ultimate treatment of these diseases, upon the establishment of end-stage liver disease, includes liver transplantation (LT). Recurrence of autoimmune liver diseases after LT is an entity increasingly recognized in the last few decades. The mechanisms driving recurrence remain poorly understood. The accurate diagnosis of the recurrence and the proper management of the affected patients remains a clinical challenge. This review discusses clinical aspects related to the recurrence of autoimmune liver diseases after LT. The main goals of this review are to discuss the reasons explaining the variability of the incidence rates of recurrent autoimmune disease and the outcome and risk factors for recurrent disease. We discuss in detail the diagnostic criteria and the treatment options of these disorders.

Autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is an effective treatment for patients with end-stage acute and chronic autoimmune hepatitis. However, despite the good outcomes reported, disease recurrence is relatively common in the allograft. In addition, autoimmunity and autoimmune liver disease can arise de novo after transplantation for non-autoimmune liver disorders. Little is known about the mechanisms by which autoimmune diseases develop after liver transplantation, but genetic factors, molecular mimicry, impaired regulatory T-cell responses, and exposures to new alloantigens might be involved. Regardless of the pathogenic mechanisms, it is important to remain aware of the existence of recurrent and de novo autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation; these disorders are similar to classic autoimmune hepatitis and are therefore not treated with standard antirejection strategies.

Liver transplantation in autoimmune liver diseases

Liver transplantation is indicated for terminal phases of autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. Indications for transplantation in autoimmune liver diseases are similar to those used in other acute or chronic liver diseases. Therapeutic advances have reduced the need for transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis and primary biliary cirrhosis but not for primary sclerosing cholangitis. Overall, outcomes of transplantation for autoimmune liver diseases are excellent. However, recurrence of autoimmune liver diseases in the allograft has variable impacts on graft and patient survivals. Treatment of recurrent diseases requires changes in immunosuppression or addition of ursodeoxycholic acid. Among autoimmune liver diseases, only autoimmune hepatitis occurs de novo in recipients transplanted for other diseases. Patients transplanted for autoimmune hepatitis or primary sclerosing cholangitis are at risk for reactivation or de novo onset of ulcerative colitis. Better understanding of the pathogenesis of recurrent autoimmune liver diseases is needed to devise effective means of prevention and treatment.

Therapy of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis was the first chronic liver disease with a favourable response to drug therapy and a dismal prognosis when left untreated. Since its original description in 1950 and first treatment studies the basic therapeutic strategy of inducing remission with steroids and azathioprine has not been modified in principle. A timely diagnosis before cirrhosis develops, the avoidance of immunosuppressant side effect, non-responders to standard induction therapy, and adherence to therapy are the greatest challenges. Alternative immunosuppressive drugs have been tested in small series and include transplant immunosuppressants. A recent large multicenter prospective treatment trial suggests that budesonide may offer an alternative in non-cirrhotic AIH patients capable of minimizing unwanted steroid effects. The ultimate treatment approach upon drug treatment failure is liver transplantation. Only four percent of transplant candidates are transplanted for AIH but the risk for graft loss because of recurrence has to be considered and recurrent AIH treated after transplantation.

Current views on rejection pathology in liver transplantation

Histological assessments continue to play an important role in the diagnosis and management of liver allograft rejection. The changes occurring in acute and chronic rejection are well recognized and liver biopsy remains the 'gold standard' for diagnosing these two conditions. Recent interest has focused on the diagnosis of late cellular rejection, which may have different histological appearances to early acute rejection and instead has features that overlap with so-called 'de novo autoimmune hepatitis' and 'idiopathic post-transplant chronic hepatitis'. There is increasing evidence to suggest that 'central perivenulitis' may be an important manifestation of late rejection, although other causes of centrilobular necro-inflammation need to be considered in the differential diagnosis. There are also important areas of overlap between rejection and recurrent hepatitis C infection and the distinction between these two conditions continues to be a problem in the assessment of liver allograft biopsies. Studies using immunohistochemical staining for C4d as a marker for antibody-mediated damage have found evidence of C4d deposition in liver allograft rejection, but the functional significance of these observations is currently uncertain. This review will focus on these difficult and controversial areas in the pathology of rejection, documenting what is currently known and identifying areas where further clarification is required.

Autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis is a chronic inflammatory disease of the liver with a dismal prognosis when left untreated. Key for the improvement of prognosis is a timely diagnosis before cirrhosis has developed. This is reached by the exclusion of other causes of hepatitis, elevated immunoglobulin G, autoantibody profile and histological assessment. Treatment achieves remission rates in 80% of individuals and consists of immunosuppression with corticosteroids and azathioprine. A recent randomised controlled multicenter trial has added budesonide to the effective treatment options in non-cirrhotic patients and leads to a reduction of unwanted steroid side effects. Autoimmune hepatitis is an autoimmune disease of unknown aetiology. Association studies of major histocompatibility complex and other genes demonstrate an influence of immunogenetics. However, apart from the autoimmune polyglandular syndrome type 1, in which 10% of patients suffer from an autoantibody-positive autoimmune hepatitis linked to mutations of the autoimmune regulator gene, there is no clear evidence for a hereditary aetiology of this disease.

Autoimmune liver diseases and recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation: what have we learned so far?

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) may all recur after liver transplant. Diagnosis of rPBC is defined by histology; rAIH by serology, biochemistry and histology; rPSC by histology and/or imaging of the biliary tree and exclusion of other causes of nonanastomotic biliary strictures. Criteria for recurrent disease (RD) may differ from those used in similar disease in the native liver: frequent use of immunosuppressive therapy changes the pattern and natural history of RD and can co-exist with other transplant-related causes of graft damage. RD may occur in the presence of normal liver tests; the reported incidence will depend on the way in which diagnostic tests (especially protocol biopsies) are applied. The risk of RD increases with time, but does not correlate with the rate of graft loss. Treatment is largely unproven: ursodeoxycholic acid will improve serology and may slow progression of rPSC and rPBC; introduction or increased dose of corticosteroids may reduce progression of rAIH. Risk factors for rPBC include use of tacrolimus compared with cyclosporine; for rPSC include absence of colon peri-transplantation and for rAIH possible associations with some HLA haplotypes have been suggested.

Liver transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis: a single-center experience

OBJECTIVE

To present our experience with deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) and living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH).

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Between April 2001 and November 2006, a total of 116 LT procedures were performed (73 DDLTs and 43 LDLTs) in 112 patients (4 retransplants). Of the 112 recipients, 16 patients (14.3%) were transplanted for AIH (15 DDLTs and 1 LDLT). All recipients received FK506- and steroid-based immunosuppressive regimens.

RESULTS

The male/female ratio was 3/13, median age was 22 years (range, 15 to 35), and the median MELD score was 25 (range, 11 to 40). Arterial reconstruction was needed in four DDLTs due to severe steroid-induced angiopathy. After a median follow-up period of 530 days (range, 11 to 2016), the overall patient and graft survival rates were 93.8%. Only one patient died following LDLT due to primary graft nonfunction. Histopathologic recurrence was seen in three patients (18.7%) and was successfully treated by optimizing immunosuppression. Markedly elevated serum CA19-9 levels (median, 1069; range, 217 to 2855) was seen in four patients (28%), malignancy was ruled out and all patients normalized serum CA19-9 levels within the first 3 months posttransplant. Steroids withdrawal failed in all recipients and was always accompanied with almost immediate elevation of liver enzymes.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, LT for AIH shows excellent long-term outcomes, patients are usually young women who present with acute deterioration and high MELD scores, and usually require long-term steroids to prevent rejection and disease recurrence. Some patients have markedly high CA19-9 in absence of malignancy. Some patients also have severe steroid-induced hepatic artery angiopathy necessitating arterial reconstruction during the transplant surgery.

Recurrence of nonviral diseases

As long-term graft survival and mortality after liver transplantation improve, recognition that allografts may be affected by the same disease process that resulted in the failure of the liver is of both clinical and academic importance. Recipients need to be counseled about recurrence and potential impact on graft function and graft survival; clinicians need to be aware of the potential of recurrence to interpret the clinical, laboratory, radiologic, and histologic findings and alter management. Understanding which conditions recur in the allograft and factors associated with recurrence may shed light on pathogenesis. This article discusses the recurrence of nonviral diseases after liver transplantation, diagnosis, and management.

Recurrence of autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation without elevation of alanine aminotransferase

It is controversial whether steroid therapy should be continued to prevent the recurrence of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) in patients who have undergone liver transplantation (LTx) due to AIH. We report a case of recurrent autoimmune hepatitis after LTx despite a persistently normal range of alanine aminotransferase (ALT). A 50-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital because of jaundice and severe liver dysfunction, where she was diagnosed with liver failure due to AIH. Steroid therapy was not effective enough and the patient received living-donor LTx in 1999. Following the operation, the level of ALT was maintained within a normal range and anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) became negative, however, the serum level of IgG gradually elevated and ANA became positive, while platelets decreased. A liver biopsy performed 6 years after LTx showed histological findings of AIH and she was diagnosed with recurrent AIH. A recurrence of AIH may occur after LTx even if the level of ALT remains within a normal range. We consider that a protocol liver biopsy should be performed in patients who undergo LTx due to AIH to decide the indication for steroid therapy.

The impact of pathologist experience on liver transplant biopsy interpretation

We studied the impact of pathologist experience on liver transplant biopsy interpretation for cases designated 'nonspecific' by pathologists at a nontransplant center. Among 102 consecutive liver transplant biopsies from 92 patients performed at the Foothills Medical Center, 30 liver biopsies from 23 patients were designated 'nonspecific' by the local pathologist. These biopsy slides were independently reviewed by an expert in liver transplant pathology at a major US transplant center. The expert pathologist was given only the information on the original requisition. In seven biopsies from five patients, there was full agreement between the external expert and the local pathologist. In 10 biopsies from six patients, the expert concurred with the initial assessment but emphasized critical negatives such as 'no evidence of rejection or recurrent hepatitis'. A discrepant diagnosis was found in 13 biopsies from 12 patients. In five biopsies from four patients, the revised diagnoses were inaccurate due to insufficient or misleading clinical information on the requisition. In eight biopsies from eight patients, the revised diagnoses were proven to be correct by clinicopathologic correlation. Our study shows that pathology expertise helped to clarify the diagnosis in about 27% of cases, which justifies the cost of obtaining a second opinion in difficult biopsies. Misinterpretation by the expert pathologist in up to 17% of biopsies highlights the importance of direct communication between hepatologist and pathologist in order to achieve a correct diagnosis. Familiarity with those cases with relatively uncommon histology, a diligent search for subtle morphologic changes, and use of standard terminology could improve the quality of liver transplant biopsy interpretation in a nontransplant center.

Diagnosis and management of allograft failure

The article focuses on diagnosis and management of allograft failure in four main categories: (1) ischemic-reperfusion injury (primary nonfunction), (2) technical complications (hepatic artery and portal vein thrombosis), (3) chronic rejection, and (4) recurrent disease. It also discusses the complex problems involved in retransplantation for allograft failure.

Effect of ethanol on innate antiviral pathways and HCV replication in human liver cells

Alcohol abuse reduces response rates to IFN therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C. To model the molecular mechanisms behind this phenotype, we characterized the effects of ethanol on Jak-Stat and MAPK pathways in Huh7 human hepatoma cells, in HCV replicon cell lines, and in primary human hepatocytes. High physiological concentrations of acute ethanol activated the Jak-Stat and p38 MAPK pathways and inhibited HCV replication in several independent replicon cell lines. Moreover, acute ethanol induced Stat1 serine phosphorylation, which was partially mediated by the p38 MAPK pathway. In contrast, when combined with exogenously applied IFN-alpha, ethanol inhibited the antiviral actions of IFN against HCV replication, involving inhibition of IFN-induced Stat1 tyrosine phosphorylation. These effects of alcohol occurred independently of i) alcohol metabolism via ADH and CYP2E1, and ii) cytotoxic or cytostatic effects of ethanol. In this model system, ethanol directly perturbs the Jak-Stat pathway, and HCV replication. Infection with Hepatitis C virus is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world. With a propensity to progress to chronic infection, approximately 70% of patients with chronic viremia develop histological evidence of chronic liver diseases including chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. The situation is even more dire for patients who abuse ethanol, where the risk of developing end stage liver disease is significantly higher as compared to HCV patients who do not drink 12.Recombinant interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) therapy produces sustained responses (ie clearance of viremia) in 8-12% of patients with chronic hepatitis C 3. Significant improvements in response rates can be achieved with IFN plus ribavirin combination 456 and pegylated IFN plus ribavirin 78 therapies. However, over 50% of chronically infected patients still do not clear viremia. Moreover, HCV-infected patients who abuse alcohol have extremely low response rates to IFN therapy 9, but the mechanisms involved have not been clarified.MAPKs play essential roles in regulation of differentiation, cell growth, and responses to cytokines, chemokines and stress. The core element in MAPK signaling consists of a module of 3 kinases, named MKKK, MKK, and MAPK, which sequentially phosphorylate each other 10. Currently, four MAPK modules have been characterized in mammalian cells: Extracellular Regulated Kinases (ERK1 and 2), Stress activated/c-Jun N terminal kinase (SAPK/JNK), p38 MAP kinases, and ERK5 11. Interestingly, ethanol modulates MAPKs 12. However, information on how ethanol affects MAPKs in the context of innate antiviral pathways such as the Jak-Stat pathway in human cells is extremely limited. When IFN-alpha binds its receptor, two receptor associated tyrosine kinases, Tyk2 and Jak1 become activated by phosphorylation, and phosphorylate Stat1 and Stat2 on conserved tyrosine residues 13. Stat1 and Stat2 combine with the IRF-9 protein to form the transcription factor interferon stimulated gene factor 3 (ISGF-3), which binds to the interferon stimulated response element (ISRE), and induces transcription of IFN-alpha-induced genes (ISG). The ISGs mediate the antiviral effects of IFN. The transcriptional activities of Stats 1, 3, 4, 5a, and 5b are also regulated by serine phosphorylation 14. Phosphorylation of Stat1 on a conserved serine amino acid at position 727 (S727), results in maximal transcriptional activity of the ISGF-3 transcription factor complex 15. Although cross-talk between p38 MAPK and the Jak-Stat pathway is essential for IFN-induced ISRE transcription, p38 does not participate in IFN induction of Stat1 serine phosphorylation 1416171819. However, cellular stress responses induced by stimuli such as ultraviolet light do induce p38 MAPK mediated Stat1 S727 phosphorylation 18. In the current report, we postulated that alcohol and HCV proteins modulate MAPK and Jak-Stat pathways in human liver cells. To begin to address these issues, we characterized the interaction of acute ethanol on Jak-Stat and MAPK pathways in Huh7 cells, HCV replicon cells lines, and primary human hepatocytes.

Chronic Hepatitis C Infection in a Rural Medicaid HMO

CONTEXT

Chronic hepatitis C infection (CHCI) is an increasingly common problem, affecting about 2% of the US population. The cost and complexity of treatment and difficulties in communicating with the infected population are of concern to insurers and health planners.

PURPOSE

To describe the clinical features of patients with CHCI in a rural Medicaid-covered population and to describe a method developed for treating CHCI in an underserved rural community.

METHODS

We developed a disease management approach to patients with CHCI receiving insurance coverage through a Medicaid HMO in rural Oregon. A locally based multidisciplinary hepatitis committee was formed to develop a management protocol and a process for selecting patients for treatment. The committee met monthly to develop the treatment plan for individual patients. Day-to-day treatment was provided by a nurse under the supervision of the committee.

FINDINGS

One hundred forty-three adults with CHCI were identified by their primary care physicians. About half the patients had a type 1 genotype. Treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin was completed on 21 persons, 11 (52%) of whom had a virologic cure. Problems with treatment toxicity were common. Patient satisfaction with the treatment by the nurse was high.

CONCLUSIONS

CHCI is common in this rural, nonminority Medicaid-insured population. A locally based disease management model was developed that was well received by patients and was successful in delivering a high quality of care for people with CHCI in a rural area.

Utility of azathioprine metabolite measurements in post-transplant recurrent autoimmune and immune-mediated hepatitis

Patients with post-transplant immune-mediated hepatitis (IMH) and recurrent autoimmune hepatitis (RAIH) have a poor outcome and a higher need for retransplantation. Azathioprine (AZA) is used as adjunctive immunosuppression after transplantation; optimizing its dose may be a key point in preserving graft function. Complications of high AZA dosing make dose escalation potentially problematic. Our aim was to correlate AZA metabolite levels with therapeutic effects, toxicity, and adherence to medication in children with IMH and RAIH. Charts of 14 patients were retrospectively reviewed. The post-transplant diagnosis was based on liver biopsy and autoimmune markers. AZA was prescribed after establishing the post-transplant diagnosis. AZA was started at 1.1 (1.0-1.8) mg/kg/day. Routine biochemical studies, tacrolimus levels, 6-thioguanine (6-TG) and 6-methylmercaptopurine levels were assessed every 8 wk. AZA dose was routinely adjusted to achieve 6-TG levels between 235 and 450 pmol per 8 x 10(8) RBC. A total of 92 samples from 14 patients were reviewed. Four patients were excluded because of non-adherence. AZA dose was increased by 245% resulting in eight of 10 patients in the target range; no hepatic or bone marrow toxicity was observed. ALT levels and steroid requirements were significantly reduced (p < 0.05). The AZA dose required to achieve target 6-TG levels was significantly greater in children <10 yr. AZA metabolite testing in children post-liver transplant is useful in assessing adherence to medication and it is potentially helpful in optimizing medication dosing. In younger children the AZA dose requirements were two to four times higher than previously reported standard doses.

Long-term outcome of liver transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation is the final therapeutic option for about 10% of patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) who do not respond to medical therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcome in serologically defined subgroups of AIH after transplantation.

METHODS

Pre- and post-transplantation data of 28 patients with AIH transplanted between 1987 and 1999 were retrospectively analyzed and compared with 24 patients, who underwent liver transplantation because of Wilson's disease and glycogen storage disease type 1.

RESULTS

Serological analyses identified patients with AIH type 1 (n = 13), type 2 (n = 5), and type 3 (n = 10). The 5-yr patient survival rate after liver transplantation was 78.2%, which was not significantly different from the control group. Six AIH patients and four control patients required re-transplantation because of initial non-function, chronic rejection or AIH recurrence. Patients transplanted for AIH (88%) had more episodes of acute rejection when compared with patients transplanted for genetic liver diseases (50%). Clinical and histological features of chronic rejection were present in four patients, which did not differ significantly from the controls. Recurrence of AIH was diagnosed in nine patients (32%) based upon the presence of autoantibodies, increased gamma-globulins, steroid dependency, and histological evidence of chronic hepatitis. These combined features were not found in any of the controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data do not suggest that AIH subtypes influence prognosis after liver transplantation. Despite a high frequency of acute cellular rejection episodes and disease recurrence, transplantation for AIH has a 5-yr survival rate, which does not differ from that observed in patients transplanted for genetic liver diseases.

Hemopoietic progenitor cells and bone marrow stromal cells in patients with autoimmune hepatitis type 1 and primary biliary cirrhosis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has been used in severe cases of autoimmunity. We investigated whether hemopoietic progenitor cells and/or bone marrow (BM) microenvironment are affected in autoimmune hepatitis type-1 (AIH-1) and primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC).

METHODS

We studied 13 AIH-1 patients, 13 PBC patients, 12 cirrhotic controls (CC) and ten healthy controls (HC). Flow cytometry, expansion cultures, long-term BM cultures and clonogenic progenitor cell assays were used. Stromal cell function was assessed in long-term BM cultures recharged with normal CD34+ cells.

RESULTS

AIH-1 had increased CD34+, CD34+/CD38+ and CD34+/CD38- cells compared to all groups (P<0.001). PBC had lower progenitor cells compared to controls (P<0.005). No differences were found between CC and HC. Committed progenitor cells in non-adherent cell fraction were increased in AIH-1 (P<0.05) but decreased in PBC compared to controls (P<0.05). Granulocyte-macrophage colony forming units (CFU) and erythroid-burst CFU were increased in AIH-1 compared to all groups (P<0.001). PBC had these CFUs decreased compared to controls (P<0.005). Stromal cells failed to support normal hemopoiesis in PBC.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated for the first time that AIH-1 had increased hemopoietic progenitor cells and normal stromal function. In PBC, progenitor cells and BM microenvironment were defective. Further studies will determine the significance of these novel findings.

Hepatitis C: what every case manager should know

Over the next decade, case managers can anticipate encountering increasing numbers of clients with hepatitis C. This article provides a sociopolitical and medical overview of hepatitis C, diagnosis, risk and transmission factors, co-infection of HIV and hepatitis C treatment issues. The article identifies and analyzes policy and practice implications for case managers in health care.

Liver transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis: fulminant versus chronic hepatitis presentation

AIMS

The aim of this study was to analyse long-term outcomes of patients with liver transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis and to determine if fulminant/subfulminant hepatic failure (FSHF) at presentation was a predictor of outcome after ortothopic liver transplantation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between April 1990 and October 2002, 18 patients with autoimmune hepatitis underwent 21 liver transplants. Three patients were excluded because of coexisting causes of hepatitis. Seven patients had FSHF and eight patients had chronic disease. The initial immunosuppressive regimen was cyclosporine based in 80%, and all but one patient received steroids or azathioprine.

RESULTS

Mean age at time of transplant was 44.2+/-15.5 years. Patients were followed for 38.9+/-29.6 months. Five patients (33.3%) had seven episodes of acute rejection (two steroid-resistant). Three patients developed chronic rejection. One patient displayed histologically proven recurrent autoimmune hepatitis. Actuarial patient and graft survival rates at 1 and 5 years were 80% and 56% and 78.6% and 51%, respectively. No differences in the clinical characteristics of the patients, rates of acute or chronic rejection episodes, end biliary or arterial complications were observed between FSHF and chronic autoimmune hepatitis. The study suggests a better survival for autoimmune FSHF (P=.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Liver transplant is indicated for patients displaying autoimmune chronic liver disease and FSHF with similar clinical courses at however, patients with FSHF at presentation had better survivals.

Transition of care between paediatric and adult gastroenterology. Autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare chronic disease of the liver with an excellent prognosis under medical therapy capable of reaching complete remission. The diagnosis of AIH relies on the exclusion of viral, metabolic, genetic and toxic aetiologies of chronic hepatitis, or hepatic injury. Autoantibodies contribute to the diagnosis of AIH and have led to the serological subclassification into three distinct types. Also, immunogenetic associations suggest heterogeneity of the syndrome of AIH. Treatment is not based on serological types but is uniformly employed for all subtypes of AIH. Although 90% of patients respond to treatment, immunosuppressive drugs used in transplant medicine have been employed for patients with treatment failure. New drugs, such as budenoside, are being evaluated for the long-term treatment of AIH with a reduction in steroid side-effects. Liver transplantation is an established treatment option for patients who fail to reach remission and progress to cirrhosis and liver failure. In Europe, about 4% of cirrhotic patients with the diagnosis of AIH undergo transplantation. The diagnosis and awareness of the disease is designed to reduce mortality and morbidity.

Identification and management of hepatitis C patients in primary care clinics

OBJECTIVE

Previous survey-based research suggested that hepatitis C patients receive suboptimal care in primary care settings. The aim of our study was to define the actual level of care hepatitis C patients receive in primary care clinics.

METHODS

Medical records of 229 hepatitis C antibody-positive (group 1), 229 hepatitis C antibody-negative (group 2), and 229 patients not tested for hepatitis C antibody (group 3) were reviewed to assess the indications for hepatitis C testing and the subsequent management and referral of hepatitis C antibody-positive patients diagnosed in primary care clinics. In addition, the compliance of primary care physicians with hepatitis C screening and testing guidelines was assessed.

RESULTS

Only 16% of group 1 and 10% of group 2 patients were tested for hepatitis C based on physician-identified risk factors. Only 1% of group 3 patients had documented discussion of hepatitis C risk factors during their initial visit with a primary care physician. The majority of hepatitis C antibody-positive patients was appropriately evaluated in primary care clinics, and most (77%) hepatitis C RNA-positive patients with elevated liver enzymes were referred for subspecialty care. Of the 59 patients who underwent liver biopsy, 40% had bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatitis C testing is rarely initiated in primary care clinics based on physician-identified risk factors. Interventions should be developed to optimize early diagnosis of hepatitis C as significant liver disease may be present despite the absence of symptoms.

Autoimmune hepatitis and overlap syndromes

Autoimmune hepatitis is a well-established chronic liver disease. It primarily affects women, is characterized by circulating autoantibodies and elevated gammaglobulins and is associated with extrahepatic immune-mediated syndromes. Treatment regimens have remained unchanged for a number of years because of the high efficacy of steroid monotherapy, or combination therapy of azathioprine and steroids. In approximately 90% of patients remission of the disease is reached by medical therapy, which is usually administered lifelong because long-term remission after drug withdrawal is achieved in only 17% of patients. In 10% of patients treatment failure is observed. The challenge of remission induction involves the use of transplant immunosuppressants such as cyclosporine, mycophenolate moffetil, and tacrolimus. The challenge of maintenance therapy minimizing steroid side-effects involves the evaluation of topical steroids and the use of azathioprine monotherapy. Overlap syndromes occur in approximately 20% of autoimmune liver diseases. The diagnosis is broadly based on serological, biochemical, clinical and histological parameters. Most common are the overlap of autoimmune hepatitis and primary biliary cirrhosis, as well as autoimmune hepatitis with primary sclerosing cholangitis. These yet incompletely defined syndromes are an important differential diagnosis in the difficult-to-treat patient with autoimmune hepatitis.

HCV chronic hepatitis in patients with HIV: clinical management issues

HIV-hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection is common and affects more than one-third of all HIV infected persons worldwide. Prevalence among risk categories varies according to shared risk factors for transmission, mainly intravenous drug use (IDU) and hemophiliacs. Chronic HCV infection seems to accelerate the course of HIV disease, resulting in a worsened clinical and immunological progression. At the same time, several studies suggest that HIV disease modifies the natural history of HCV infection, leading to a faster course of progression from active hepatitis to cirrhosis, to end stage liver disease and death. HCV infection mimics opportunistic diseases because its natural history is significantly accelerated in HIV patients. Since highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has slowed the progression of HIV disease and decreased the rate of HIV associated mortality, the prognosis of HIV disease has been modified, and the need to treat HCV coinfection become a significant issue. Because of the poor response rate obtained by either interferon alone or interferon thrice weekly plus ribavirin, the combination of pegylated interferon and ribavirin will probably become the standard of care, although the clinicians should be aware of the overlapping toxicity of nucleoside analogues and ribavirin. Many selected categories of patients pose particular challenges to physicians treating HCV infection: nonresponders to interferon, cirrhotic patients, and patients infected with both HCV and HBV. Liver transplantation in HIV patients is currently under evaluation, but should become the rescue therapy for HIV patients with end stage liver disease.

Response to steroids in de novo autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation

Graft dysfunction associated with autoimmune phenomena has been recently described in liver transplant recipients without previous autoimmune disease. However, the natural history, diagnostic criteria, and definitive therapeutic approach of de novo autoimmune hepatitis (de novo AIH) are poorly understood. We report 12 cases of de novo AIH 27.9 +/- 24.5 months after liver transplantation: the outcome of 7 patients treated with steroids is compared with a group of 5 nontreated patients. Nontreated patients lost the graft after 5.8 +/- 2.6 months from de novo AIH onset. All treated patients were alive after 48.4 +/- 14 (29-65) months from de novo AIH onset, and none of them lost the graft. However, 5 patients relapsed in relation to steroid tapering. All patients presented an atypical antiliver/kidney cytosolic autoantibody, associated to classical autoantibodies in 10 cases. Histological study showed several degrees of lobular necrosis and inflammatory infiltrate. HLA antigen frequencies and matching were compared with 2 control groups (16 orthotopic liver transplantation [LTX] patients without de novo AIH and 929 healthy blood donors); de novo AIH patients showed a higher prevalence of HLA-DR3 (54.5% vs. 25.9%, P =.04) than healthy controls, which was not observed in LTX patients without de novo AIH. In conclusion, this new disease should be included in the differential diagnosis of unexplained graft dysfunction. In addition, treatment with steroids results in a dramatically improved outcome. However, maintenance therapy is usually required.

High-dose interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin in patients previously treated with interferon: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Kinetic studies have demonstrated a more rapid reduction in hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA levels among patients taking high daily doses of interferon compared with those taking standard-dose interferon.

GOALS

To compare the efficacy and safety of high-dose interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin with standard-dose interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C patients previously treated with interferon.

STUDY

One hundred seven patients (30 interferon relapsers and 77 interferon nonresponders) were randomized to take either high-dose interferon alfa-2b in combination with ribavirin (group A) (consisting of 5 MU/d for 4 weeks, 5 MU three times weekly for 8 weeks, and then 3 MU three times weekly for 36 weeks) or standard-dose interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin (group B) for 48 weeks. Serum alanine transaminase (ALT), HCV RNA levels, and safety data were prospectively collected and compared during treatment and at week 24 of follow-up.

RESULTS

The mean serum ALT and HCV RNA levels, as well as the proportion of patients with genotype 1 and cirrhosis and who were African American, were similar in the two treatment groups at study entry. The rates of suppression of HCV RNA to undetectable levels at weeks 4, 12, and 48 were similar. In addition, the sustained virologic response rates at week 24 of follow-up were similar in groups A and B (29% vs. 39%, respectively, p = 0.277). Clinical variables that correlated with a sustained virologic response included a history of relapse to previous interferon therapy and non-1 HCV genotype ( p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term, high-dose interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin failed to demonstrate a tangible benefit compared with standard-dose interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin. However, our study results and others suggest that standard-dose interferon and ribavirin for 48 weeks should be considered for selected patients who did not respond to previous interferon therapy.

Hepatitis C and human immune deficiency coinfection at the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy

Interactions between human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) have been widely studied before the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapies (HAART). We reviewed the potential impact of HAART on hepatitis C as well as the interactions between HIV and HCV therapies. Physicians should be aware of the potential risk of: (i) symptomatic liver disease in HCV-HIV-coinfected patients at the era of triple antiretroviral therapy; (ii) potential liver deterioration paralleling immune restoration; (iii) lack of impact of triple antiretroviral therapy on HCV load; and (iv) potential drug-related hepatitis which may modify the natural history of HCV-related liver disease. Liver biopsies should be performed regularly in these patients in order to identify patients with severe liver disease who require early initiation of anti-HCV therapy under close monitoring of their immune status. Treatment is, to date, based on the combination of ribavirin and interferon with an expected sustained response rate around 25%. An important unresolved issue is to better delineate the temporal place of anti-HCV and anti-HIV antiviral therapies. At least in coinfected patients with significant liver disease, namely necro-inflammatory activity and/or fibrosis >or= 2, we believe that anti-HCV therapy is the priority since it lessens the risk of drug-induced hepatitis and of hepatitis due to immune restoration.

Chronic Hepatitis C

Infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) accounts for 40% of cases of chronic liver disease in the United States and is now the most common indication for liver transplantation. Estimates suggest that 4 million people (1.8%) of the American population are or have been infected with HCV. Currently, the treatment of choice for patients with chronic HCV infection is recombinant interferon alfa with ribavirin. Pegylated interferons are a promising new development, and in combination with ribavirin, they will rapidly become the standard of care. The goals of therapy are to slow disease progression, improve hepatic histology, reduce infectivity, and reduce the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. Sustained virologic response, which generally implies the absence of viremia for 6 months or more following completion of therapy, is increasingly being regarded as a cure, with evidence of slowing or even regression of fibrosis on follow-up liver biopsy. A number of factors have been shown to be predictive of a sustained response, including viral genotype other than 1, low serum HCV RNA levels, absence of cirrhosis, younger age, female gender, and shorter duration of infection. Disease severity as assessed by liver biopsy, comorbidities, and possible contraindications to therapy should be weighed in the decision to begin treatment. Counseling patients regarding transmission, natural history, and drug and alcohol abstinence also should be included in management. Close monitoring should be done during treatment for side effects of interferon, including depression and bone marrow suppression. Hemolytic anemia is the major side effect of ribavirin.

Hepatitis C: a hepatologist's approach to an infectious disease

The evaluation and management of hepatitis C differ from those of other infectious diseases in important ways. In this review, the roles of liver biopsy, virus load determination, and genotyping in the pretreatment evaluation and monitoring of patients with hepatitis C are discussed from a hepatologist's perspective.

Therapeutic advances in the management of hepatitis B and hepatitis C

Until recently, interferon monotherapy has been the only available therapeutic option for patients with chronic hepatitis B and hepatitis C. Lamivudine has emerged as another effective first-line therapy for chronic hepatitis B as well as a beneficial treatment option for patients with decompensated hepatitis B cirrhosis. Viral resistance with long-term lamivudine therapy remains a major concern but new data continue to show benefits despite the development of YMDD mutations. Combination therapy with ribavirin and pegylated interferon-alpha has revolutionized the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. The rate of sustained virological response can now be expected to be as high as nearly 50% for genotype 1 and 80% for non-1 genotypes of hepatitis C.

Effect of HCV viral dynamics on treatment design: lessons learned from HIV

Viral load measurements provide an indication of viral replication, and thereby serve as a valuable tool to guide the initiation of therapy and subsequent changes. Plasma human immunodeficiency viral load strongly predicts the rate of decrease in CD4+ lymphocyte count, and progression to AIDS and death. Furthermore, the efficacy of antiretroviral therapy can be assessed by monitoring changes in plasma human immunodeficiency viral load. Similarly, viral load provides valuable information about the natural history of the hepatitis C virus infection. Hepatitis C viral load can be used to predict the likelihood of response to standard interferon-alpha treatment and other interferon-alpha regimens and to monitor treatment efficacy. Increased understanding of the natural history of the hepatitis C virus infection and the nature of resistance to interferon-alpha therapy suggests that effective treatment regimens must maintain serum levels of interferon-alpha. Ideally, interferon-alpha serum levels should provide constant pressure on the virus and should prevent viral rebound, thereby avoiding continued viral replication and minimizing the potential for emergence of resistant quasi-species. Current regimens designed to address these points include early aggressive intervention, combination drug regimens, prolonged maintenance, and novel interferons. By enabling the design and rapid assessment of new treatment regimens, viral load measurement will revolutionize the clinical management of the hepatitis C virus infection, as it has the HIV.

Development of pegylated interferons for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C

The chemical attachment of poly(ethylene glycol) [PEG] to therapeutic proteins produces several benefits, including enhanced plasma half-life, lower toxicity, and increased drug stability and solubility. In certain instances, pegylation of a protein can increase its therapeutic efficacy by reducing the ability of the immune system to detect and mount an attack on the compound. A PEG-protein conjugate is formed by first activating the PEG moiety so that it will react with, and couple to, the protein. PEG moieties vary considerably in molecular weight and conformation, with the early moieties (monofunctional PEGs; mPEGs) being linear with molecular weights of 12kD or less, and later moieties being of increased molecular weights. PEG2, a recent innovation in PEG technology, involves the coupling of a 30kD (or less) mPEG to lysine that is further reacted to form a branched structure that behaves like a linear mPEG of much larger molecular weight. These compounds are pH and temperature stable, and this factor along with the large molecular weight may account for the restricted volume of distribution seen with drugs utilising these reagents. Three PEG-protein conjugates are currently approved for clinical use in the US, with more under clinical development. Pegademase is used in the treatment of severe combined immunodeficiency disease, pegaspargase for the treatment of various leukaemias, and pegylated interferon-alpha for chronic hepatitis C virus infections. As illustrated in the case of the 2 pegylated interferon-alphas, all pegylated proteins are not equal. The choice of PEG reagent and coupling chemistry is critical to the properties of the PEG-protein conjugate, with the molecular weight of the moiety affecting its rate and route of clearance from the body, and coupling chemistry affecting the strength of the covalent attachment of PEG to therapeutic protein.

Combination therapy with interferon-alpha and ribavirin for hepatitis C: practical treatment issues

Combination therapy with ribavirin and interferon (IFN)-alpha for 6 to 12 months is currently the treatment of choice for chronic hepatitis C infection. The overall sustained response rate to treatment, defined as loss of hepatitis C virus (HCV) from serum 6 months after completion of treatment, is 40%. The indications for treatment are serum HCV RNA positivity, abnormal serum transaminases and the presence of portal fibrosis and/or moderate/severe inflammation. Response rates are lower in genotype 1 than in genotype 2 or 3 and in the presence of a high viral load. Anaemia is the most common adverse event and is due to ribavirin; neuropsychiatric adverse effects due to IFNalpha lead to premature cessation of therapy in 10 to 20% of patients. The current recommended dose of interferon is 3MU given subcutaneously 3 times a week. However, it is likely that longer-acting pegylated interferons, which may be more effective and can be administered once weekly, will in the future replace currently used IFNalpha.

Physicians' preference values for hepatitis C health states and antiviral therapy: a survey

BACKGROUND

Physicians' perspectives regarding hepatitis C shape their approach to patient management. We used utility analysis to evaluate physicians' perceptions of hepatitis C-related health states (HS) and their threshold to recommend treatment.

METHODS

A written questionnaire was administered to practicing physicians. They were asked to rate hepatitis C health states on a visual analog scale ranging from 0% (death) to 100% (health without hepatitis C). Physicians then judged quality of life associated with the side effects of antiviral therapy for hepatitis C and indicated the sustained virological response rate that they would require to recommend treatment.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirteen physicians from five states were included. Median utility ratings for hepatitis C health states declined significantly with increasing severity of symptoms: HS1-No Symptoms, No Cirrhosis (88%; 12% reduction from good health), HS2-Mild Symptoms, No Cirrhosis (66%), HS3-Moderate Symptoms, No Cirrhosis (49%), HS4-Mild Symptoms, Cirrhosis (40%), HS5-Severe Symptoms, Cirrhosis (18%) [p < 0.001]. The median rating for life with side effects of antiviral therapy was 47%, suggesting a 53% reduction from good health. That was similar to the utility value for HS3-Moderate Symptoms, No Cirrhosis. The median threshold value for recommending treatment was a sustained response rate of 60%.

CONCLUSIONS

1) Physicians' utility ratings for hepatitis C health states were inversely related to the severity of disease manifestations described. 2) Physicians viewed side effects of therapy unfavorably and indicated that on average, they would require a 60% sustained response rate before recommending treatment, which far exceeds the efficacy of current antiviral therapy for hepatitis C in the majority of patients.