Living donor liver transplantation for children with liver failure and concurrent multiple organ system failure

Current Status and Outcomes of Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Pediatric Acute Liver Failure: Results From a Multicenter Retrospective Study Over Two Decades

BACKGROUND

Although the outcomes of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for pediatric acute liver failure (PALF) have improved, patient survival remains lower than in patients with chronic liver disease. We investigated whether the poor outcomes of LDLT for PALF persisted in the contemporary transplant era.

METHODS

We analyzed 193 patients who underwent LDLT between December 2000 and December 2020. The outcomes of patients managed in 2000-2010 (era 1) and 2011-2020 (era 2) were compared.

RESULTS

The median age at the time of LDLT was 1.2 years both eras. An unknown etiology was the major cause in both groups. Patients in era 1 were more likely to have surgical complications, including hepatic artery and biliary complications (p = 0.001 and p = 0.013, respectively). The era had no impact on the infection rate after LDLT (cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, and sepsis). The mortality rates of patients and grafts in era one were significantly higher (p = 0.03 and p = 0.047, respectively). The 1- and 5-year survival rates were 76.4% and 70.9%, respectively, in era 1, while they were 88.3% and 81.9% in era 2 (p = 0.042). Rejection was the most common cause of graft loss in both groups. In the multivariate analysis, sepsis during the 30 days after LDLT was independently associated with graft loss (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The survival of patients with PALF has improved in the contemporary transplant era. The early detection and proper management of rejection in patients, while being cautious of sepsis, should be recommended to improve outcomes further.

Baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio is associated with survival for infant living donor liver transplantation for biliary atresia

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in infants for congenital biliary atresia (BA) poses various challenges nowadays. We aim to investigate independent preoperative risk factors for LDLT in infants. We retrospectively analyzed medical records of infant patients who underwent LDLT surgery for BA from 1 July 2014 to 31 December 2016. Cox regression was used to explore risk factors. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the recipient and graft survival, and subgroup analysis was then applied according to the risk factors. Independent t test or Mann-Whitney U test was applied for comparison of certain factors between survival patients and death. A total of 345 infant LDLT for BA were included in the analysis. In the multivariate Cox-regression model, 3 factors were determined as independent risk factors for recipient and graft survival, there were neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), pediatric end-stage liver disease (PELD), and recipient age. The HR (95% CI) of baseline NLR for recipient and graft survival were 1.25 (1.12-1.38) and 1.25 (1.13-1.39), with all P < .0001. Kaplan-Meier curves for NLR using different cut-offs (1.5; 1, 2) suggested that higher baseline NLR was significantly associated with recipient and graft survival. The subgroup analysis indicated that for infants with elevated NLR, the recipient survival was significantly lower when their age >6 months or PELD >20. Our results indicate that infants with higher baseline NLR value may have lower survival rate 3 years after transplantation. Further investigations about broaden the application of pre- and post-transplant NLR to guide nutrition intervention and immunosuppression therapy are necessary.

Acute liver failure in children-Is living donor liver transplantation justified?

OBJECTIVES

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in patients with acute liver failure (ALF) has become an acceptable alternative to transplantation from deceased donors (DDLT). The aim of this study was to analyze outcomes of LDLT in pediatric patients with ALF based on our center's experience.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We enrolled 63 children (at our institution) with ALF who underwent liver transplantation between 1997 and 2016. Among them 24 (38%) underwent a LDLT and 39 (62%) received a DDLT. Retrospectively analyzed patient clinical data included: time lapse between qualification for transplantation and transplant surgery, graft characteristics, postoperative complications, long-term results post-transplantation, and living donor morbidity. Overall, we have made a comparison of clinical results between LDLT and DDLT groups.

RESULTS

Follow-up periods ranged from 12 to 182 months (median 109 months) for LDLT patients and 12 to 183 months (median 72 months) for DDLT patients. The median waiting time for a transplant was shorter in LDLT group than in DDLT group. There was not a single case of primary non-function (PNF) in the LDLT group and 20 out of 24 patients (83.3%) had good early graft function; 3 patients (12.5%) in the LDLT group died within 2 months of transplantation but there was no late mortality. In comparison, 4 out of 39 patients (10.2%) had PNF in DDLT group while 20 patients (51.2%) had good early graft function; 8 patients (20.5%) died early within 2 months and 2 patients (5.1%) died late after transplantation. The LDLT group had a shorter cold ischemia time (CIT) of 4 hours in comparison to 9.2 hours in the DDLT group (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

LDLT is a lifesaving procedure for pediatric patients with ALF. Our experience showed that it may be performed with very good results, and with very low morbidity and no mortality among living donors when performed by experienced teams following strict procedures.

Live donor liver transplantation for acute liver failure: A single center experience

INTRODUCTION

Acute liver failure (ALF) is an indication for emergency liver transplantation (LT). Although centers performing only deceased donor liver transplants (DDLT) have shown improved outcomes in this situation, they still have relatively long waiting lists. An alternative would be living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), which has shown equivalent outcomes in the elective situation but there is limited evidence of its results in ALF.

AIM

The purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes in patients with ALF undergoing emergency LDLT in our center in Delhi, India.

METHODS

We prospectively collected data on 479 patients who underwent LT in our hospital between January 2009 and December 2015 to evaluate the outcomes of those with ALF. The ALF patients were listed for transplantation after they met the Kings' College criteria and rapid evaluation was done following a protocol consisting of three phases. Patients with grade III/IV encephalopathy were put on mechanical ventilation. Data regarding their postoperative course, morbidity, and mortality were analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-six (7.5%) out of the 479 patients underwent emergency LT for ALF. Their mean age was 27.5 years (range 4-59 years) and the male to female ratio of 2:3. Preoperative intubation was required in 15 of 25 patients who had encephalopathy. Wilson's disease was the most common cause of ALF in children while in adults, it was acute viral hepatitis. The time interval between listing and transplantation was a mean of 36 ± 12.4 h. The mean graft to recipient weight ratio (GRWR) was 1.06 ± 0.3. The recipients were extubated postoperatively after a mean period of 2.6 days and their mean ICU stay was 6.3 days. Postoperative infection was the most common complication and required upgradation of antifungal and antibiotic treatments. Neurological complications occurred in five patients. Thirty-one of 36 (86.1%) patients survived and progressive cerebral edema and sepsis were the most common causes of mortality. Patients who died had higher model for end-stage liver disease scores, longer cold ischemia time (CIT), and higher grades of encephalopathy (though 80% patients with encephalopathy survived). There was no donor mortality. At long-term follow up of a median of 56 months, 29 (80.5%) of 36 patients were still alive.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, LDLT is an alternative procedure to DDLT in patients with ALF and is associated with good outcomes even in patients with high grades of encephalopathy.

Outcomes of living versus deceased donor liver transplantation for acute liver failure in the United States

Clinical outcomes for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for acute liver failure (ALF) in the United States remain to be determined. To address this gap in knowledge, we examined post-liver transplantation outcomes of adults with ALF undergoing LDLT and deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) in the United States. We analyzed Organ and Procurement and Transplantation Network data for adults with ALF who were listed for liver transplantation as status 1 or 1A and who underwent LDLT (N = 21) or DDLT (N = 2316) between October 1987 and April 2011. We found no strong evidence that the survival probabilities for adults with ALF who underwent LDLT were inferior to those who underwent DDLT (P = .764). In adults with ALF who underwent LDLT, 1- and 5-year survival probabilities were both 71%; for DDLT these probabilities were 79% and 71%, respectively. In adults with ALF, 1- and 5-year liver graft survival probabilities, respectively, were 62% and 57% for LDLT, and 74% and 66% for DDLT. In these series of adults with ALF who were listed as status 1 or 1A, patient and graft survival rates for LDLT were similar to those for DDLT. Our findings suggest that if deceased donor livers are unavailable, LDLT is an acceptable option in experienced centers for adults with ALF.

Living donor liver transplantation in children: a single North American center experience over two decades

Little data concerning hospital charges and long-term outcomes of LDLT in North American children according to transplant indications have been published. To compare outcomes of patient and graft survival and healthcare charges for LDLT for those with BA vs. other diagnoses (non-BA). A retrospective review of 52 children receiving 53 LDLT (38 BA and 14 non-BA) from 1992 to 2010 at our institution was performed. One-, five-, and 10-yr patient and graft survival data were comparable to national figures reported to UNOS. Average one-yr charges for recipients and donors were $242 849 for BA patients and $183 614 for non-BA (p = 0.074). BA patients were 1.23 ± 1.20 yr of age vs. 4.25 ± 5.02 for non-BA, p = 0.045. Examination of the total population of patients who were alive in 2010 in five chronological groupings showed that the crude five-yr survival rates were 1992-1995: 9/11 (82%); 1995-1997: 6/10 (60%); 1997-1999: 8/10 (80%); 1999-2001: 9/10 (90%); and 2001-2003: 7/7 (100%). Thus, examination of the clinical and financial data together over the entire period of the transplant program suggests that the dramatic improvement in patient survival was accomplished without a dramatic increase in indexed charges. All 53 donors survived, and only 10% had complications requiring hospitalization. LDLT in children results in excellent outcomes for patients and donors. Ways to lower costs and maximize graft outcome should be investigated.

Outcomes of patients with benign liver diseases undergoing living donor versus deceased donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The number of people undergoing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has increased rapidly in many transplant centres. Patients considering LDLT need to know whether LDLT is riskier than deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing LDLT versus DDLT.

METHODS

A total of 349 patients with benign liver diseases were recruited from 2005 to 2011 for this study. LDLT was performed in 128 patients, and DDLT was performed in 221 patients. Pre- and intra-operative variables for the two groups were compared. Statistically analysed post-operative outcomes include the postoperative incidence of complication, biliary and vascular complication, hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence, long-term survival rate and outcomes of emergency transplantation.

RESULTS

The waiting times were 22.10±15.31 days for the patients undergoing LDLT versus 35.81±29.18 days for the patients undergoing DDLT. The cold ischemia time (CIT) was 119.34±19.75 minutes for the LDLT group and 346±154.18 for DDLT group. LDLT group had higher intraoperative blood loss, but red blood cell (RBC) transfusion was not different. Similar ≥ Clavien III complications, vascular complications, hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence and long-term survival rates were noted. LDLT patients suffered a higher incidence of biliary complications in the early postoperative days. However, during the long-term follow-up period, biliary complication rates were similar between the two groups. The long-term survival rate of patients undergoing emergency transplantation was lower than of patients undergoing elective transplantation. However, no significant difference was observed between emergency LDLT and emergency DDLT.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing LDLT achieved similar outcomes to patients undergoing DDLT. Although LDLT patients may suffer a higher incidence of early biliary complications, the total biliary complication rate was similar during the long-term follow-up period.

Improved outcomes in pediatric liver transplantation for acute liver failure

OLT is a life-saving option for ALF.

AIM

To evaluate our outcomes in pediatric OLT for ALF.

METHODS

Retrospective review of our data between 1992 and 2007.

RESULTS

Of 142 children with ALF, 126 were listed, of which 40 spontaneously improved, nine died, and 77 underwent OLT (median waiting time four days). Fifty-three children received deceased donor grafts (34 whole and 19 split grafts), and there were 24 living donor grafts. The one- and five-yr patient survival was 87% and 80%, and graft survival 83% and 79%, respectively. Thirteen patients died after OLT, and there were nine retransplants in seven patients. Patient weight, length of stay, creatinine, and infection were significantly associated with death; increased weight and black ethnicity were associated with graft loss on univariate analysis, but not on multivariate analysis. There were no significant differences in patient survival (one and five yr), graft loss, or other complications between the groups.

CONCLUSION

We report the largest single-center study of OLT in pediatric ALF, demonstrating no difference in outcomes between different graft types. Our liberal use of segmental grafts may allow earlier OLT in this high-risk cohort and contribute to our excellent outcomes.

Living-related donor liver transplantation for children with fulminant hepatic failure in Israel

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation is considered the treatment of choice for most children with deteriorating fulminant hepatic failure (FHF). Living-related donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been suggested as an alternative to cadaveric liver transplantation to overcome the shortage of organ donors. However, experience with LDLT for children with FHF is limited in the Western world.

OBJECTIVE

To present the experience with LDLT for children with FHF in a major referral center in Israel.

METHODS

The files of all children who underwent primary LDLT for FHF were reviewed for demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters before and after transplantation.

RESULTS

: During 1996 to 2007, 13 children diagnosed with FHF underwent primary LDLT. Median age was 4 years (range 0.75-14 years); the causes of FHF were acute hepatitis A in 4 patients and were unknown in 9 patients. Short-term complications, documented in 12 children, included mainly hepatic artery thrombosis (n = 5), which warranted retransplantation in 3 cases, and biliary leaks (n = 3). Three patients died within the first month after LDLT of severe intraoperative bleeding (n = 1), severe brain edema (n = 1), and multiorgan failure (n = 1). Long-term complications were less common and included mainly ascending cholangitis (n = 3). Patient survival rate was 68% at 1 year and 57% at 5 years. None of the donors had long-term complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Among children with FHF, LDLT can serve as a timely and lifesaving alternative to cadaveric donation, and could reduce the dependence on cadaveric livers in this setting.

Paediatric acute liver failure and transplantation: The University of Essen experience

To report our experience with 17 children who underwent a liver transplantation (LT) for acute liver failure (ALF). All LT procedures (deceased and living donor) were offered. Since 2003 Molecular Adsorbents Recycling System (MARS) was proposed as bridging procedure. We monitored the perioperative course and the short- and long-term outcomes. All children developed pretransplant hepatic encephalopathy (mostly grades II and III); six needed ventilator support and three haemodialysis. Median PELD/MELD score was 30. MARS was used in five children with poor pretransplant prognostic factors: all five survived the LT without sequelae. We performed 13 deceased donor LT (seven whole, five split and onr reduced) and four left lateral LDLT. Postoperative complications were observed in 10 children, requiring re-operation in seven. Two children developed irreversible neurological disorders. After a median follow up of 45 months, 16 children are still alive. About 1- and 5-year cumulative patient survival rates are 94% with a corresponding graft survival of 88% and 81%, respectively. The combination of experienced paediatric ICU management, the application of new liver support devices, and the capacity to offer both living and deceased donor transplant alternatives in a timely fashion represent the best formula to achieve optimal results in children with ALF.

Current trends in live liver donation

The introduction of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been one of the most remarkable steps in the field of liver transplantation (LT), able to significantly expand the scarce donor pool in countries in which the growing demands of organs are not met by the shortage of available cadaveric grafts. Although the benefits of this procedure are enormous, the physical and psychological sacrifice of the donors is immense, and the expectations for a good outcome for themselves, as well as for the recipients, are high. We report a current overview of the latest trends in live liver donation in its different aspects (i.e. donor's selection, evaluation, operation, morbidity, mortality, ethics and psychology). This review is based on our center's personal experience with almost 200 LDLTs and a detailed analysis of the international literature of the last 7 years about this topic. Knowing in detail how to approach to the different aspects of living liver donation may be helpful in further improve donor's safety and even recipient's outcome.

More on parental living liver donation for children with fulminant hepatic failure: addressing concerns about competing interests, coercion, consent and balancing acts

Parental living liver donation for children with fulminant hepatic failure raises complex ethical issues. According to a recent editorial in this journal, these include contradictory interests, the possibility of coercion and compromised consent and the need to balance the risks to the donor against the potential benefits for the recipient. Here I argue that in this setting, interests are often aligned rather than conflicted, that coercion of parental donors is rare, that consent may sometimes be valid even when it is not fully informed and that the correct balance to consider is the relative weights of risks and benefits for the donor. I conclude that living liver donation by parents of children with fulminant hepatic failure is consistent with societal norms of parental behavior, ethically acceptable and should be permitted regardless of the efficiency of the deceased donor organ recovery program.

Is it right to promote living donor liver transplantation for fulminant hepatic failure in pediatric recipients?

Good clinical results are currently achieved in elective pediatric liver transplantation (LT) with living-related donors. However, the question whether such therapeutic approach may also be promoted in case of fulminant hepatic failure (FHF) remains a matter of debate. This work briefly reviews the ethical background and overall medical results of living-related donation in pediatric LT. When considering FHF, success is essentially conditioned by the availability of a suitable organ donor before the onset of irreversible brain damage and death of the transplant candidate on the waiting list. Accordingly, living donor LT provides several advantages for patients with FHF, including the short waiting time and the access to a transplant with reduced ischemic injury and optimal graft quality; however, living donation is also characterized by several drawbacks to be carefully considered, particularly the possibility of coercion to the recipient's family as well as the operative risks of the emergency donor hepatectomy. The ethical soundness of living parental donor LT for FHF is discussed, with emphasis to the type of medical context, with or without access to an efficient emergency postmortem organ sharing system.

Live donor liver transplantation for fulminant hepatic failure in children

The mortality rate among children with fulminant hepatic failure (FHF) on the waiting list for cadaveric donor liver transplantation (CDLT) is high. Results of emergency CDLT in this situation often are unsatisfactory, and a long-term survival rate less than 30% has been reported. Live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for FHF in children has been advocated, but is reported rarely. We present our experience with LDLT in children with FHF. Between September 1993 and December 2002, primary LDLT was performed for 26 children; 8 of these children had FHF. Patient demographics, clinical and laboratory data, surgical details, complications, and graft and patient survival are reviewed. Four boys and four girls received left-lateral segment (n = 7) and full left-lobe (n = 1) grafts. Mean age was 2.9 +/- 1.2 years (range, 3 months to 11 years). Causes of FHF were drug induced in 2 patients and idiopathic in 6 patients. One child received a blood group-incompatible graft. Two patients died; 1 patient of cytomegalovirus infection at 8.6 months and 1 patient of recurrent hepatitis of unknown cause at 2.8 months after LDLT. The child who received a mismatched graft had refractory rejection and underwent a second LDLT with a blood group-compatible graft 19 days afterward. He eventually died of lymphoproliferative disease. Another patient developed graft failure related to venous outflow obstruction and survived after retransplantation with a cadaveric graft. With a median follow-up of 13.2 months (range, 2.8 to 60.3 months), actuarial graft and patient survival rates were 50% and 62.5%, respectively. Survival results appear inferior compared with those of 18 children who underwent LDLT for elective conditions during the same study period (graft survival, 89%; P =.051; patient survival, 89%; P =.281). Although survival outcomes are inferior to those in elective situations, LDLT is a timely and lifesaving procedure for children with FHF.

Living-donor liver transplantation for high-urgency situations

Patients in high-urgency situations for liver transplantation have a high mortality rate while on the waiting list for cadaveric grafts. In countries where cadaveric organ donation is scarce, the use of living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) provides the only chance of survival for both pediatric and adult patients. It results in a satisfactory overall survival, from approximately 60% to 75% in pediatric patients and from 70% to 90% in adult patients. Patients who had early LDLT were shown to have a better survival outcome than those who waited for cadaveric organ donation, because a timely graft was available to them before they deteriorated further to multiple organ failure. Patients who were in high-urgency situations for liver transplantation and opted for LDLT were also shown to have significantly better survival outcomes than those who did not opt for this procedure. Although left lobe liver graft can be used successfully in adult-to-adult LDLT in high-urgency situations, there is a trend toward a more frequent use of the larger mass provided by the right lobe of the liver. Adequate venous drainage of the anterior segment of the right lobe liver graft is also considered essential for the favorable outcome of the recipients. Although donor morbidity has been reported to be low in LDLT and no donor death has been reported from Asian transplant centers, standardized definitions of morbidity and better methods for observing and measuring outcomes are necessary to understand and to potentially reduce morbidity.