Relationship between airway sensitivity to adenosine 5' monophosphate and the shape of the concentration-response curve to methacholine in subjects with allergic rhinitis

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine and adenosine monophosphate and the degree of atopy in children with allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

nonasthmatic patients with allergic rhinitis often have bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR). Not only the presence but also the degree of atopy are important factors in BHR of patients with asthma. BHR is commonly evaluated by bronchial challenges using direct or indirect stimuli.

OBJECTIVES

to assess BHR to methacholine (direct) and to adenosine monophosphate (AMP) (indirect) in children with allergic rhinitis and to compare their relationships with the degree of atopy.

METHODS

methacholine and AMP challenges were performed in 88 children with allergic rhinitis, and a provocative concentration causing a 20% decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (PC(20)) was calculated for each challenge. The degree of atopy was measured using serum total IgE levels, number of positive skin prick test results, and atopic scores (sum of graded wheal size).

RESULTS

BHR to methacholine (PC(20) <8 mg/mL) and to AMP (PC(20) <200 mg/mL) was observed in 22 (25%) and 30 (34%) patients, respectively. No association was found between BHR to methacholine and any atopy parameter. In contrast, serum total IgE levels and atopic scores were higher in the group with BHR to AMP than in the group without BHR to AMP. Furthermore, a significant association was found between the degree of these 2 parameters and BHR to AMP (score for trend, P < .001 and P = .03, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

both BHR to methacholine and BHR to AMP were detected in a significant proportion of children with allergic rhinitis. The degree of atopy seems to be an important factor in BHR to AMP but not in BHR to methacholine.

Maximal response plateau to adenosine 5'-monophosphate in asthma. Relationship with the response to methacholine, exhaled nitric oxide, and exhaled breath condensate pH

BACKGROUND

No information is available on the plateau in response to adenosine 5'-monophosphate(AMP). The aims of the present study were (1) to determine whether plateau can be detected with AMP and the relation with the plateau in response to methacholine, and (2) to identify the relation between the plateau and indirect markers of airway inflammation, such as exhaled nitric oxide (ENO) and exhaled breath condensate (EBC) pH.

METHODS

Airway responsiveness to high concentrations of methacholine and AMP, ENO levels, and EBC pH values were obtained in 31 subjects with well-controlled asthma. Concentration-response curves were characterized by their concentration of agonist that produces a decrease in FEV(1) of 20% and, if possible, by the level of plateau.

RESULTS

Although the prevalence of plateau with methacholine (48%) and AMP (58%) was similar, the two challenges did not identify plateau in exactly the same individuals. In 14 subjects who showed plateau with both bronchoconstrictor agents, the mean plateau level for methacholine was 26.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.3 to 30.8), compared with 16.5% (95% CI, 12.2 to 20.8; p < 0.0001) for AMP. Both ENO and EBC pH values were similar in subjects with plateau and in those without plateau.

CONCLUSIONS

In well-controlled asthmatics, the plateau in response to AMP can be identified at a milder degree of obstruction than the plateau in response to methacholine, but the two agonists are not identifying the same airway abnormalities. Furthermore, if ENO and EBC pH are markers of inflammation, the determination of the presence or level of plateau is not a reliable method to identify airway inflammation in asthma.

Effect of omalizumab on adenosine 5'-monophosphate responsiveness in subjects with allergic asthma

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of omalizumab on bronchoconstriction induced by methacholine and adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP).

METHODS

Thirty-four subjects with mild to moderate allergic asthma were randomized to receive placebo (n = 16) or omalizumab (n = 18) subcutaneously during 12 weeks. Airway responsiveness to AMP was measured at baseline and after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment, whereas the response to methacholine was measured at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

After 4 weeks of treatment, the increase in AMP PC(20) (provocative concentration required to produce a 20% fall in FEV(1)) was significantly greater in the omalizumab group than in the placebo group, the mean difference in the change between the groups being 1.52 doubling concentrations (95% CI, 0.25-2.79, p = 0.02). Compared with baseline, the mean AMP PC(20) values at 12 weeks were increased by 1.91 doubling concentrations with omalizumab (p < 0.001) and 1.01 doubling concentrations with placebo (p = 0.16), but changes were not significantly different between the treatment groups. Changes in methacholine PC(20) values were not significantly different between the omalizumab and placebo groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In subjects with allergic asthma, omalizumab reduces the response to AMP without decreasing the response to methacholine. These findings are consistent with the conclusion that the contribution of IgE to the development of AMP bronchoconstriction is more important than their role in the induction of methacholine hyperresponsiveness.

Exhaled nitric oxide levels and airway responsiveness to adenosine 5'-monophosphate in subjects with nasal polyposis

BACKGROUND

It is widely appreciated that asthma is an inflammatory disease of the airways associated with airway hyperresponsiveness, and that nasal polyposis and asthma are related diseases. The objective of this study was to determine differences in exhaled nitric oxide (ENO) levels and airway responsiveness to adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) between nonasthmatic patients with nasal polyposis and healthy controls.

METHODS

Twenty patients without asthma with nasal polyposis and 16 healthy control subjects were enrolled in the study. Participants were challenged with increasing concentrations of AMP and methacholine. ENO was measured with the single-exhalation method.

RESULTS

Bronchoconstriction in response to AMP was detected in 7 (35%) subjects with nasal polyposis. The geometric mean (95% CI) of ENO for subjects with nasal polyposis was 33.1 parts per billion (ppb) (24.0-45.7 ppb) compared with 12.3 ppb (8.5-18.2 ppb) for the healthy controls (p = 0.0002). ENO values were significantly higher in atopic than in nonatopic subjects with nasal polyposis [51.3 ppb (32.3-83.2 ppb) vs. 24.5 ppb (16.2-37.1 ppb), p = 0.02]. Nonatopic subjects with nasal polyposis also had higher concentrations of ENO than healthy control subjects (p = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

Inhaled AMP causes airway narrowing in a significantly higher proportion of nonasthmatic subjects with nasal polyposis than in healthy controls. Furthermore, increased concentrations of ENO are detected in atopic and nonatopic subjects with nasal polyposis. These results suggest that bronchial inflammation is present in nonasthmatic subjects with nasal polyposis.

Effect of cigarette smoking on airway responsiveness to adenosine 5'-monophosphate in subjects with allergic rhinitis

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to determine differences in airway responsiveness to adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) between smokers and nonsmokers with allergic rhinitis.

METHODS

A total of 41 adults with allergic rhinitis (16 smokers and 25 nonsmokers) were challenged with increasing concentrations of methacholine and AMP. Airflow was assessed after each concentration, and the response to each bronchoconstrictor agent was measured by the provocative concentration required to produce a 20% fall in FEV(1) (PC(20)).

RESULTS

The geometric mean PC(20) AMP values were significantly lower in smokers than in nonsmokers: 72.4 mg/mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 33.9 to 154.9) vs 204.2 mg/mL (95% CI, 120.2 to 346.7) [p = 0.021]. The proportion of subjects with bronchoconstriction in response to AMP was higher in smokers (12 of 16 subjects) than in nonsmokers (7 of 25 subjects) [p = 0.005].

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that smokers with allergic rhinitis have a greater AMP sensitivity than nonsmokers.

Modifications of airway responsiveness to adenosine 5'-monophosphate and exhaled nitric oxide concentrations after the pollen season in subjects with pollen-induced rhinitis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

s: To determine the effect of cessation of exposure to pollen on airway responsiveness to adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) in subjects with pollen-induced rhinitis, and to explore the relationship between changes in airway responsiveness and changes in exhaled nitric oxide (ENO) levels.

STUDY DESIGN

Subjects were studied during the pollen season and out of season.

SETTING

Specialist allergy unit in a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Fourteen subjects without asthma with pollen-induced rhinitis who showed bronchoconstriction in response to methacholine and AMP during the pollen season and 10 healthy nonatopic control subjects.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

In subjects with pollen-induced rhinitis, ENO concentrations, provocative concentration of agonist causing a 20% fall in FEV(1) (PC(20)) methacholine, and PC(20) AMP were determined during the pollen season and out of season. Healthy control subjects were studied during the pollen season. In subjects with allergic rhinitis, PC(20) AMP increased from a geometric mean of 79.4 mg/mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 31.6 to 199.5 mg/mL) during the pollen season to 316.2 mg/mL (95% CI, 158.5 to 400.0 mg/mL) out of season (p = 0.004). The ENO concentrations decreased from 63.1 parts per billion (ppb) [95% CI, 50.1 to 79.4 ppb] during the pollen season to 30.2 ppb (95% CI, 23.4 to 38.0 ppb) out of season (p < 0.001). The ENO concentrations out of pollen season were still significantly increased in subjects with pollen-induced rhinitis when compared with healthy control subjects. There was no relationship between individual changes in ENO levels and changes in either PC(20) methacholine or PC(20) AMP.

CONCLUSIONS

In pollen-sensitive subjects with allergic rhinitis, the cessation of exposure to pollen is associated with a significant reduction of airway responsiveness to inhaled AMP. However, no association was found between allergen-induced changes in ENO values and in airway responsiveness to either direct or indirect bronchoconstrictors. These findings suggest that modifications in ENO and in airway responsiveness are the consequence of different alterations induced by allergen exposure on the lower airways.

Exhaled nitric oxide and bronchial responsiveness to adenosine 5'-monophosphate in subjects with allergic rhinitis

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To determine differences in exhaled nitric oxide (ENO) between subjects with allergic rhinitis with and without increased responsiveness to direct and indirect bronchoconstrictor agents.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study with the order of challenge tests randomized.

SETTING

Specialist allergy unit in a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Thirty-eight subjects without asthma with allergic rhinitis and 10 healthy nonatopic control subjects.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Participants were challenged with increasing concentrations of adenosine 5'monophosphate (AMP) and methacholine. ENO was measured with the single-exhalation method. A positive response to both bronchoconstrictor agents was detected in nine subjects with allergic rhinitis, whereas four subjects showed increased responsiveness to AMP but not to methacholine. The geometric mean (range) ENO values were significantly higher in subjects with allergic rhinitis with increased responsiveness to either methacholine or AMP than in subjects with normal responsiveness to both agonists: 51.3 parts per billion (ppb) [22.0 to 108.5 ppb] vs 25.1 ppb (5.7 to 102.9 ppb, respectively; p = 0.007) and healthy control subjects (11.2 ppb [5.0 to 31.9 ppb], p < 0.001). Subjects with allergic rhinitis with normal responsiveness to both agonists also had higher concentrations of ENO than healthy control subjects (p = 0.007). No correlation was found between ENO and either of the provocative concentrations of methacholine or AMP causing a 20% fall in FEV(1).

CONCLUSIONS

In subjects without asthma but with allergic rhinitis, the presence of bronchoconstriction in response to methacholine or AMP is associated with increased ENO concentrations. However, elevated concentrations of ENO are detected even in subjects with allergic rhinitis without airway hyperresponsiveness. These results suggest that the presence of airway hyperresponsiveness is not the only factor that determines the increased NO levels detected in subjects with allergic rhinitis.