Weaning from mechanical ventilation

Current Standards and Practices in Small Animal Mechanical Ventilation

Mechanical ventilation (MV) is a lifesaving intervention that is used in small animals to manage a variety of conditions. Broad indications for MV include severe hypoxemia, severe hypercapnia, and an increase in work of breathing. MV requires intensive monitoring in the ICU and a thorough knowledge of the available modes of ventilation. Nursing care is a vital component of management of these uniquely fragile patients. Ultimately, successful weaning from ventilator support in veterinary patients depends on the underlying disease process, with patients with nonpulmonary diseases generally having a more favorable prognosis than patients with primary pulmonary parenchymal disease.

Mechanical ventilation in dogs and cats with tick paralysis

Respiratory failure from tick paralysis (TP) is an important cause of mortality in cats and dogs in Australia, occurring from a combination of respiratory muscle paralysis, upper respiratory tract obstruction and pulmonary disease. Patients may require positive-pressure ventilation in management of any combination of hypoxemia, hypoventilation or respiratory fatigue, but may also require airway management due to laryngeal paralysis. No single ventilation strategy is recommended due to the heterogenous disease presentations. Lung protective ventilation should be used in patients with pulmonary disease. Due to local and systemic effects of TP, patients are at higher risk of complications such as aspiration pneumonia and corneal ulceration and may have additional intravenous fluid and nutritional considerations. Treatment with hyperimmune serum is associated with improved outcomes. Prognosis is considered good with documented survival to discharge (STD) of 52.6-77% for animals with TP ventilated with lung disease and 90.5% for animals without lung disease. Median reported duration of ventilation for TP ranges from 23 to 48 h (range 3 h-10 days). The severity of individual neuromuscular signs and the presence of associated conditions such as aspiration pneumonia and laryngeal paralysis may necessitate longer periods of mechanical ventilation. This review aims to summarize the current recommendations regarding indications, management and prognosis of cats and dogs undergoing MV for TP and to identify areas for future research.

Inclusion of airway pressure release ventilation in the management of respiratory failure and refractory hypercapnia in a dog

OBJECTIVE

To describe the use of airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) to relieve hypercapnia in a dog undergoing mechanical ventilation.

CASE SUMMARY

A 3-month-old male Shar-Pei mix presented to the emergency department with suspected noncardiogenic pulmonary edema. Due to severe hypercapnia, mechanical ventilation was initiated. The hypercapnia failed to improve with conventional pressure control mechanical ventilation, bronchodilator administration, suctioning, or endotracheal tube replacement. The dog was transitioned to APRV and maintained in this mode for 36 hours. A modified APRV protocol in which inverse inspiratory to expiratory ratios ranged from 4.3:1 to 6.0:1 was utilized, resulting in a drastic improvement in the patient's hypercapnia. The patient eventually was transitioned off the ventilator, and no respiratory abnormalities have been noted at subsequent recheck examinations.

NEW OR UNIQUE INFORMATION PROVIDED

This case documents the first use of APRV to relieve refractory hypercapnia in a dog undergoing mechanical ventilation and is one of the only recorded cases of using APRV for this purpose in the medical literature at large. APRV may be considered in cases of hypercapnia when traditional therapies fail, although caution is warranted as this mode of ventilation can also worsen hypercapnia.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety for use of two sedation and analgesia protocols to facilitate assisted ventilation of healthy dogs

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness and safety of 2 sedative-analgesic protocols to facilitate assisted ventilation in healthy dogs.

ANIMALS

12 healthy dogs.

PROCEDURES

Dogs were randomly assigned to 2 groups. Mean dosages for protocol 1 were diazepam (0.5 mg/kg/h [n = 3 dogs]) or midazolam (0.5 mg/kg/h [3]), morphine (0.6 mg/kg/h [6]), and medetomidine (1.0 microg/kg/h [6]). Mean dosages for protocol 2 were diazepam (0.5 mg/kg/h [n = 3]) or midazolam (0.5 mg/kg/h [3]), fentanyl (18 microg/kg/h [6]), and propofol (2.5 mg/kg/h [6]). Each dog received the drugs for 24 consecutive hours. All dogs were mechanically ventilated with adjustments in minute volume to maintain normocapnia and normoxemia. Cardiorespiratory variables were recorded. A numeric comfort score was assigned hourly to assess efficacy. Mouth care, position change, and physiotherapy were performed every 6 hours. Urine output was measured every 4 hours.

RESULTS

Use of both protocols maintained dogs within optimal comfort ranges > 85% of the time. The first dog in each group was excluded from the study. Significant decreases in heart rate, oxygen consumption, and oxygen extraction ratio were evident for protocol 1. Cardiac index values in ventilated dogs were lower than values reported for healthy unsedated dogs. Oxygen delivery, lactate concentration, and arterial base excess remained within reference ranges for both protocols.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Use of both protocols was effective for facilitating mechanical ventilation. A reduction in cardiac index was detected for both protocols as a result of bradycardia. However, oxygen delivery and global tissue perfusion were not negatively affected.

Use of controlled ventilation in a clinical setting

Mechanical ventilation has long been used to maintain ventilation in humans when the lungs are rendered incapable of oxygenation or when respiration is affected by central nervous system depression, but it has only recently been applied to similar cases in dogs and cats. Although manual ventilation is still the more common form of ventilation in dogs and cats, mechanical intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (IPPV) is a much more efficient and reliable means of maintaining the highest quality of respiratory assistance. With proper training, technicians can use IPPV to support compromised animals until they are capable of maintaining normal oxygen concentrations.