Information needs of patients with cancer: results from a large study in UK cancer centres

Connecting the Dots: Practical Strategies for Academic and Community Oncology Synergy to Advance Multidisciplinary Management in Immunotherapy Toxicity Care

Immunotherapy has significantly affected cancer treatment and survival rates, accompanied by an increase in immune-related adverse events (irAEs) requiring new management strategies. irAEs can affect various organ systems and have varying severity levels, with higher rates observed when combining immune checkpoint inhibitors. National organizations such as ASCO, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer, and the European Society for Medical Oncology have created guidelines for managing irAEs. This chapter expands on these guidelines by discussing practical strategies to improve the multidisciplinary management in irAE care, focusing on the who, what, and how to bridge gaps in care and enhance collaboration between academic and community oncology practices. Effective irAE management involves early recognition and guideline-adherent approaches using a multidisciplinary team, including oncologists, other subspecialists, primary care clinicians, and all care team members. Institutions are developing methods to integrate irAE care into clinical workflows, such as incorporating urgent care clinics and e-consults for efficient irAE management and developing hub-and-spoke models to extend specialized care from academic centers to community hospitals for equitable care delivery. Additionally, effective patient education is critical for improving irAE recognition and health literacy. The new ASCO Community of Practice called the Alliance for Support and Prevention of Immune-Related Adverse Events consortium and patient advocacy group Standing Together to Optimize Research, Interventions, and Education in irAEs initiatives aim to advance irAE clinical care, research, and education through global collaboration, standardized data collection, and improved outreach to patients and caregivers.

The association of appointment type in healthcare with patient reported experience measures: a population-based survey study

BACKGROUND

Poor access to healthcare and long waiting times are severe challenges in many countries and therefore countries have increasingly adopted teleconsultations such as video, messaging, and phone calls. Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) assess the quality of care based on patients' insights covering topics like the quality of communication, patient participation, and adequacy of time allocation of the appointment. The present study examined whether the type of appointment (in-person, by phone call or via digital services), service sector, and encountered health professional were associated with patients' experience of appointment quality in healthcare.

METHODS

The data from the population-based cross-sectional Healthy Finland Survey conducted from September 2022 to February 2023 including 22 665 respondents (53% women) were used. Complex samples logistic regression analyses were used to examine the associations of the independent variables (type of appointment, the service sector and encountered healthcare professional) with PREMs (sufficient time allocation, opportunity to ask questions, active participation, and responsiveness to needs) adjusted for self-rated health, age, sex, and urbanization status.

RESULTS

Those whose appointment was conducted by phone call had greater odds of not agreeing that enough time was allocated (OR = 1.57, 95%CI = 1.36-1.81), opportunity to ask was offered (OR = 1.28, 95%CI = 1.10-1.50), active participation possibilities were given (OR = 1.33, 95%CI = 1.15-1.54-), and their needs were met (OR = 1.39, 95%CI = 1.20-1.60) compared to in-person appointments. Those whose appointment was conducted by digital services had greater odds of not agreeing that enough time was allocated (OR = 1.51, 95%CI = 1.21-1.88) and opportunity to ask was offered (OR = 1.38, 95%CI = 1.07-1.78) compared to in-person appointments. Moreover, respondents had greater odds of disagreeing with PREM statements in health centers and when encountering physicians compared to their counterparts.

CONCLUSIONS

It seems that teleconsultations do not allocate enough time, offer opportunity to ask, give possibility to active participation, and meet patients' needs similarly as in-person appointments. Especially appointments conducted by phone call differed negatively from in-person visits regarding all these aspects. Our findings should be kept in mind when planning and developing teleconsultations. Teleconsultations may be a good option in many cases, but not for all patients or for all situations. Moreover, physicians and health centers should adopt means to improve time allocation, patient participation, and responsiveness to patients' needs.

Sociodemographic and clinical factors related to high rates of unmet supportive care needs among Polish cancer patients

Introduction

Cancer patients experience a wide range of unmet supportive care needs, which may lead to dissatisfaction with the health care system and poor quality of life. The aims of this study were to assess unmet supportive care needs in five areas: informative needs, psycho-emotional needs, relational needs, material needs and needs related to assistance/care, and to identify groups of cancer patients expressing high rates of unmet needs.

Materials and methods

The multicenter study was carried out among 1,062 cancer patients between June 2022 and May 2023. The study was performed using the validated Polish version of Needs Evaluation Questionnaire (NEQ). The total and subtotal NEQ scores were calculated.

Results

The mean total NEQ score was 0.44 ± 0.27. The highest subtotal NEQ scores were noted in the cases of informative needs and material needs. Predictive factors for a higher total NEQ score were younger age, living with a partner and a diagnosis of digestive system cancers or lung cancer.

Conclusion

Cancer patients expressed some unmet supportive care needs, especially informative needs. Identification of the groups of patients with high rates of unmet supportive care needs will be useful in clinical practice. Younger patients, living with a partner and those suffering from digestive system or lung cancer seem to require special attention.

Patient Education and Levels of Disease-Specific Information Needs Among Individuals With Oral Epithelial Dysplasia

BACKGROUND

Oral epithelial dysplasia (OED) is a histological diagnosis that carries an increased risk of the individual developing oral squamous cell carcinoma. We assessed the information needs (IN) and explored the sources of education used by individuals with OED using a validated OED-specific measurement.

METHODS

A total of 102 adults with OED from the oral medicine clinic of a dental hospital in Central London were selected using convenience sampling. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in which participants completed the 33-item Oral Epithelial Dysplasia Informational Needs Questionnaire (ODIN-Q), which assessed IN and gathered perspectives on patient education.

RESULTS

Approximately two-thirds of the participants (n = 66, 64%) reported meeting the IN, whereas the remaining participants (n = 36, 35%) did not. The mean and median total scores from the questionnaire were 2.43 (± 0.38) and 2.6, respectively, indicating a low sufficient level of IN. Most participants (n = 80, 78%) preferred one-on-one meetings as the primary mode of obtaining information, followed by written materials (n = 64, 62%), audiovisual resources (n = 24, 23%), and group discussions (n = 8, 0.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Some topics were insufficiently met, necessitating additional educational efforts, such as risk factors and lifestyle modifications, physical and psychological impacts, awareness of potential complications, and seeking medical and psychological support. Sex and degree of dysplasia were associated with the levels of IN. These findings may guide future longitudinal research on OED IN assessment, support the creation of tailored educational tools, and facilitate further evaluation of the psychometric properties of the ODIN-Q.

Cancer related information that cancer patients need

Good patient-doctor communication may help patients regulate their emotions, understand medical information, and assert their need for information and explanations. Cancer patients cited information needs as the most frequent unmet non-medical needs during oncological treatment. Adequate patient knowledge about the disease and treatment can affect the patient's mental state, quality of life, and satisfaction with care. The study aimed to determine whether and what kind of cancer-related information is desired by cancer patients in Poland. The study was carried out on a group of 405 cancer patients using the Shortened Cassileth's Information Styles Questionnaire (SCISQ) and Spielberg's State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI 20). Cancer patients in Poland want to receive information concerning numerous aspects of illness and treatment. Most patients wanted as much information about their disease and treatment as possible, both good and bad. Tumor localization (i.e., colorectal cancer, breast cancer), palliative intention of treatment, and low anxiety were factors increasing patients' need for cancer information. Patients with low anxiety find it easier to express their needs and share information with others. Effective identification of information needs and non-delayed recognition and treatment of anxiety should be a part of a holistic approach to cancer care in daily clinical practice.

To what extent should doctors communicate diagnostic uncertainty with their patients? An empirical ethics vignette study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Although diagnostic uncertainty is common, patient-focused research examining its communication is lacking. We aimed to determine patient preferences for the communication of diagnostic uncertainty, and examine the effects of such communication on patients.

METHODS

We applied an empirical ethics approach, integrating the data collected with ethical analysis to form normative recommendations about diagnostic uncertainty communication. In this randomised crossover study, n=111 members of the public sequentially watched two video vignettes depicting either high or low communicated diagnostic uncertainty, in one of two clinical scenarios. After watching videos, participants completed online questionnaires. Primary outcome was preferred video (high vs low communicated uncertainty); secondary outcomes included satisfaction, trust, worry and understanding. Quantitative data were analysed using logistic regression and a linear mixed effects model; qualitative data were analysed thematically.

RESULTS

Quantitative analysis demonstrated that participants preferred greater diagnostic uncertainty communication, even though these vignettes were more worrying. Qualitative data revealed heterogeneous participant views justifying their communication preferences. These data raise issues relating to how doctors might balance harms versus benefits in diagnostic uncertainty communication and how doctors might communicate in the face of heterogeneous patient information preferences.

CONCLUSIONS

We argue that doctors should err on the side of greater diagnostic uncertainty communication: to not do so (eg, based on benign paternalistic ideas about avoiding patient worry) or to do so variably (eg, based on unevidenced assumptions about patient information preferences) risks depriving patients of information they may value and may create or exacerbate inequalities.

Development and effectiveness evaluation of an interactive e-learning environment to enhance digital health literacy in cancer patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

The Internet allows cancer patients to access information about their disease at any time. However, the quality of online information varies widely and is often inaccurate or does not provide all the details patients need to make informed decisions. Additionally, patients' often limited ability to find and evaluate cancer-related online information can lead to misinformation.

Objective

An interactive e-learning environment to promote digital health literacy will be developed and evaluated for effectiveness.

Primary hypothesis

Cancer patients who use the e-learning environment (IG1.1-IG1.3) or the content of the environment as a non-interactive PDF file (IG2) will show greater improvement in their digital health literacy from baseline to 8 weeks after baseline compared to patients who receive no such intervention, but are referred to a standard information brochure.

Methods

The hypothesis will be tested in a stratified randomized controlled superiority trial with five parallel groups and the primary endpoint of digital health literacy. In an e-learning environment, patients will learn strategies to use when searching for reliable cancer-related online information. During development, a prototype will be refined through focus groups and tested for usability by experts and patients. 660 cancer patients will be recruited using convenience sampling and randomly assigned in a 3:1:1 ratio to IG1.1-IG1.3 (three variants of the environment), IG2, or the control group. Two thirds of the 660 participants will be recruited through the German Cancer Information Service (CIS) and one third through non-CIS routes. Allocation will follow stratified randomization, accounting for recruitment route (CIS vs. non-CIS) and cancer type (breast cancer vs. other cancers), with variable block length. The primary outcome, digital health literacy, will be measured at baseline, 2 weeks, and 8 weeks after baseline.

Conclusion

If the results support the primary hypothesis, then the e-learning environment could empower patients to retrieve more reliable information about their disease. Concerns about the generalizability of the results, since a disproportionate number of inquiries to the CIS come from breast cancer patients, are addressed by a proportionally stratified randomization strategy and diversified recruitment routes.

Disclosure of true medical information: the case of Bangladesh

BACKGROUND

Truth-telling in health care is about providing patients with accurate information about their diagnoses and prognoses to enable them to make decisions that can benefit their overall health. Physicians worldwide, especially in the United Kingdom (U.K.) and the United States (U.S.), openly share such medical information. Bangladesh, however, is a Muslim-majority society with different social norms than Western societies. Therefore, we examined whether Muslim culture supports truth disclosure for patients, particularly how and to what extent medical information about life-threatening diseases is provided to patients in Bangladesh.

METHODS

This was a phenomenological qualitative study. We conducted thirty in-depth interviews with clinicians, nurses, patients and their relatives at Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College Hospital in Dhaka, Bangladesh. We also used observations to explore interactions between patients, families and healthcare professionals regarding their involvement in medical decisions and truth disclosure issues. NVivo software was used to identify common themes, and a thematic analysis method was utilised to analyse the datasets.

RESULTS

This study identified three recurring themes relevant to the ethics and practice of truth disclosure: best interest rather than autonomy, the ambivalent value of deception and who understands what. The participants revealed that physicians often withhold fatal medical prognoses from terminally ill patients to ensure the best healthcare outcomes. The results indicate that deception towards patients is commonly accepted as a means of reducing burden and providing comfort. The participants opined that true medical information should be withheld from some patients, assuming that such disclosures may create a severe burden on them. Whether or to what extent medical information is disclosed primarily depends on a family's wishes and preferences.

CONCLUSIONS

While truth disclosure to patients is considered an ethical norm in many cultures, such as in the U.K. and the U.S., the practice of concealing or partially revealing severe medical prognoses to patients is an actual medical practice in Bangladeshi society. This study emphasises the importance of recognising a patient's active involvement and respecting the cultural values that shape family involvement in medical decision-making. These findings may have significant policy and practical implications for promoting patient autonomy within Bangladeshi family dynamics and religious-based cultural values.

Evaluating surgeon communication of pancreatic cancer prognosis using the VitalTalk ADAPT framework

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Few data exist to guide optimal communication practices for surgical oncologists. VitalTalk, an evidence-based communication skills training model for clinicians, offers the five-step ADAPT tool for discussing prognosis. This study aimed to characterize surgeon communication of pancreatic cancer prognosis using VitalTalk's ADAPT framework.

METHODS

Contemporaneous audio recordings from 12 initial surgeon-patient encounters for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer were transcribed. Directed qualitative content analysis based on ADAPT (Ask, Discover, Anticipate, Provide, and Track) was used to deductively code transcripts.

RESULTS

All encounters contained at least one ADAPT step while only one (8%) incorporated four or five steps. Surgeons provided prognostic information (Provide) in all but one encounter (92%); most was qualitative and clustered into themes: serious illness, surgical candidacy, prognostic ambiguity, and cancer recurrence. Surgeons elicited understanding (Ask), requested information preferences (Discover), anticipated ambivalence (Anticipate), and responded to emotion (Track) in a minority of encounters (25%-42%); of 15 patient emotional cues, six were not addressed by surgeons.

CONCLUSIONS

During an initial encounter for pancreatic cancer, surgeons focus heavily on providing information but omit critical prognostic communication steps. Future studies are needed to investigate if surgeon training in palliative care-based communication is feasible and impacts patient-perceived quality of communication.

The predation relationship between online medical search and online medical consultation-empirical research based on Baidu platform data

Introduction

This study investigates the mutual influence between online medical search and online medical consultation. It focuses on understanding the health information needs that drive these health information-seeking behaviors by utilizing insights from behavioral big data.

Methods

We used actual behavioral data from Chinese internet users on Baidu platform's "Epidemic Index" from November 26, 2022, to January 25, 2023. Data modeling was conducted to ensure the reliability of the model. Drawing on the logistic model, we constructed a foundational model to quantify the evolutionary patterns of online medical search and online medical consultation. An impact function was defined to measure their mutual influence. Additionally, a pattern detection experiment was conducted to determine the structure of the impact function with maximum commonality through data fitting.

Results

The analysis allowed us to build a mathematical model that quantifies the nonlinear correlation between online medical search and online medical consultation. Numerical analysis revealed a predation mechanism between online medical consultation and online medical search, highlighting the role of health information needs in this dynamic.

Discussion

This study offers a novel practical approach to better meet the public's health information needs by understanding the interplay between online medical search and consultation. Additionally, the modeling method used here is broadly applicable, providing a framework for quantifying nonlinear correlations among different behaviors when appropriate data is available.

Advantages, barriers, and cues to advance care planning engagement in elderly patients with cancer and family members in Southern Thailand: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Older cancer patients are vulnerable to poorer health outcomes during cancer treatment. Although the Thai elderly had their own preferences towards future medical care and advance care planning (ACP) could help cancer patients make informed decisions, Thai physicians report a low ACP engagement rate. Thus, this study aimed to explore the perceptions of older cancer patients and their families towards ACP engagement.

METHOD

We used a qualitative approach to explore the perceptions of non-haematological cancer patients aged ≥ 60 years old and their primary caregivers. The study was conducted at the Oncology Radiotherapy Referral Center, Songklagarind Hospital in Southern Thailand. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with the patients and their caregivers. Thematic analysis was used to identify and analyze recurring patterns and themes of perceptions regarding ACP engagement within the interview transcripts.

RESULTS

Among the 138 families approached, 32 interviews were conducted. Three themes were found: (1) Advantageous opportunity: the patients believed ACP would help them realize their life values, and ensure that their preference would be respected; (2) contemplation and barriers to ACP: ACP is unfamiliar and unnecessary, might have low utility, worry patients and family members, take away optimism, would not be a proper activity for the patient at the current health situation; and (3) Cues for ACP initiation: perceived conformity with one's religion, awareness of the current cancer state, having multiple comorbidity or experience suffering related with medical care, wishing not to burden family, having close family members, and trust in physicians.

CONCLUSION

ACP engagement could be hindered or promoted by perceptions of older patients and/ or their family members, as well as the communication skills of the care providers. Care professionals who aim to initiate ACP should minimize the potential barriers, make the ACP benefits salient, and watch for cues indicating a propitious time to start the ACP conversation.

Sociodemographic Correlates of Low Health Literacy Skills Among Cancer Survivors: National Findings From BRFSS 2016

PURPOSE

This study aimed to explore associations of sociodemographic factors with difficulties in three health literacy (HL) skills and the severity of low HL skills.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional secondary data analysis. Subjects: Data came from 17,834 adults who responded to the HL module with a response rate of 47% in the 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

MEASURES

Independent variables included sex, age, race/ethnicity, education, employment and income. Dependent variables are three HL skills: obtaining, understanding oral, and understanding written health information.

ANALYSIS

We conducted weighted Chi-square tests and multinominal logistic regressions.

RESULTS

Cancer survivors younger than 65 (aged 18-39: AOR = 4.46, P < .001; aged 40-64: AOR = 2.29, P < .001), Hispanic (AOR = 2.17, CI = 1.61-2.50, P < .01) had higher odds of difficulty obtaining health information. Female cancer survivors had lower odds of difficulty comprehending oral (AOR = .69, CI = .55-.87, P < .01) and written (AOR = .58, CI = .46-.74, P < .001) information. The relative risk ratio of having difficulties in three HL tasks was higher for those who were younger than 65 (aged 18-39: RRR = 10.18, CI = 2.41-4.3, P < .01; aged 40-64: RRR = 4.01, CI = 2.09-7.69, P < .001), Hispanic (RRR = 3.24, CI = 1.66-11.34, P < .01), unemployed (RRR = 6.1, CI = 2.88-12.76, P < .001), education levels lower than some college (some high school: RRR = 4.34, P < .01; high school: RRR = 2.62, P < .05) and household income under $25,000 (RRR = 6.99, CI = 2.8-17.5, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Intervention and communication materials need to be tailored for patients with different HL skills considering age, gender, socioeconomic status and cultural backgrounds.

The Use of Podcasts as Patient Preparation for Hospital Visits-An Interview Study Exploring Patients' Experiences

INTRODUCTION

Podcasts have emerged as a promising tool in patient preparation for hospital visits. However, the nuanced experiences of patients who engage with this medium remain underexplored.

OBJECTIVES

This study explored patients' experiences of receiving information by way of podcasts prior to their hospital visits.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients with suspected chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), lung cancer, or sleep apnea. The method of data analysis chosen was thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Based on data from 24 interviews, five key themes were identified: technical challenges in utilization of podcasts; individual preferences for information prior to hospital visits; building trust and reducing anxiety through podcasts; the role of podcasts as an accessible and convenient source of information; and enhancement of engagement and empowerment through podcasts. Additionally, the study highlighted the critical importance of tailoring podcasts' content to individual preferences to optimize the delivery of healthcare information.

CONCLUSIONS

Podcasts can serve as a meaningful supplement to traditional information sources for patients. However, it is important to recognize that not all patients may be able to engage with this medium effectively due to technical challenges or personal preferences.

Comparative analysis of treatment decision-making in patients with localized prostate and cervical cancer: what influences receiving surgery or radiotherapy?

PURPOSE

This study focused on identifying the factors influencing the decision-making process in patients with localized prostate and cervical cancer in Japan and specifically examining the choice between surgery and radiotherapy.

METHODS

Patients with specific cancer stages registered with a healthcare research company for whom radical surgery or radiotherapy was equally effective and recommended participated in this cross-sectional online survey.

RESULTS

The responses of 206 and 231 patients with prostate and cervical cancer, respectively, revealed that both groups relied heavily on the physicians' recommendations (prostate: odds ratio (OR) = 40.3, p < 0.001; cervical: OR = 5.59, p < 0.001) and their impression of radiotherapy (prostate: OR = 9.22, p < 0.001; cervical: OR = 2.31, p < 0.001). Factors such as hypertension (OR = 6.48, p < 0.05), diabetes mellitus (OR = 9.68, p < 0.05), employment status (OR = 0.08, p < 0.01), and impressions of surgery (OR = 0.14, p < 0.01) also played a significant role in patients with prostate cancer. In contrast, the specialty of the physician (OR = 4.55, p < 0.05) proposing the treatment influenced the decision-making process of patients with cervical cancer. Information sources varied between the two groups: patients with prostate cancer were more inclined towards printed materials, whereas patients with cervical cancer were more inclined towards interpersonal relationships.

CONCLUSION

Although several limitations, such as the sample and recall bias, were noted, this study emphasizes the role of psychosocial factors in the decision-making process and the requirement for tailored information sources.

Addressing disparities in European cancer outcomes: a qualitative study Protocol of the BEACON project

Introduction

Health disparities represent a crucial factor in cancer survival rates, awareness, quality of life, and mental health of people receiving a cancer diagnosis and their families. Income, education, geographic location, and ethnicity are some of the most important underlying reasons for health disparities in cancer across Europe. Costs of healthcare, access to information, psycho-oncological support options, integration of cancer research and innovative care, and multidisciplinary cancer teams are the main target areas when it comes to addressing disparities in the cancer context. As part of the Beacon Project (BEACON), we developed a protocol for a qualitative study to explore and identify any relevant reasons for cancer inequalities and disparities in Europe.

Methods

Our four stakeholders namely, cancer patients, healthcare providers, researchers, and policymakers will be recruited online, facilitated by collaborative efforts with cancer organizations from various European countries, including but not limited to Italy, Croatia, Estonia, and Slovenia. Qualitative online focus group discussions for each stakeholder will be conducted and transcribed. Subsequently, thematic analysis will be used to identify reasons and aspects that may contribute to the existing disparities in cancer outcomes at various levels of engagement and from different stakeholders' perspectives. Results from focus groups will inform a subsequent Delphi study and a SWOT analysis methodology.

Discussion

Although advances in medical research, cancer screening and treatment options are constantly progressing, disparities in access to and awareness of healthcare in cancer patients are even more noticeable. Thus, mapping the capacity and capability of cancer centres in the European Union, creating decision support tools that will assist the four stakeholders' information needs and improving the quality of European cancer centres will be the main objectives of the BEACON project. The current protocol will outline the methodological and practical procedures to conduct online focus group discussions with different stakeholders.

Applications of Machine Learning (ML) and Mathematical Modeling (MM) in Healthcare with Special Focus on Cancer Prognosis and Anticancer Therapy: Current Status and Challenges

The use of data-driven high-throughput analytical techniques, which has given rise to computational oncology, is undisputed. The widespread use of machine learning (ML) and mathematical modeling (MM)-based techniques is widely acknowledged. These two approaches have fueled the advancement in cancer research and eventually led to the uptake of telemedicine in cancer care. For diagnostic, prognostic, and treatment purposes concerning different types of cancer research, vast databases of varied information with manifold dimensions are required, and indeed, all this information can only be managed by an automated system developed utilizing ML and MM. In addition, MM is being used to probe the relationship between the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD interactions) of anti-cancer substances to improve cancer treatment, and also to refine the quality of existing treatment models by being incorporated at all steps of research and development related to cancer and in routine patient care. This review will serve as a consolidation of the advancement and benefits of ML and MM techniques with a special focus on the area of cancer prognosis and anticancer therapy, leading to the identification of challenges (data quantity, ethical consideration, and data privacy) which are yet to be fully addressed in current studies.

The role of family and culture in the disclosure of bad news: A multicentre cross-sectional study in Pakistan

Objectives

Disclosure of bad news is distressing for patients and family members. Our aim was to assess patients' perceptions and preferences regarding bad news in the health setting.

Methods

Cross-sectional, multi-centered study supported by an external grant in 15 Government and Private Hospitals across Pakistan. A sample size of 1673 patients and family members was used. Ethics permission/consent was taken from each participating hospital and participant. Responses were compared across provinces, gender, age, education and income.

Results

>80% patients preferred their relatives to know the diagnosis first and they wanted the news to be disclosed to them by doctors. Significant association between education level, income and preference for wanting to know the diagnosis was found. Reasons for wanting to know the diagnosis included treatment, prognosis and prevention options whereas reasons for not wanting to know included fear of emotions and God's will.

Conclusion

The majority of Pakistani patients want to be informed and want the family to know first. Preferences for disclosure vary across, age, education and income level.

Innovation

First countrywide study on this topic. Identifies need for culturally sensitive guidelines that include the family's role in disclosure of bad news.

First impressions: A prospective evaluation of patient-physician concordance and satisfaction following the initial medical oncology consultation

BACKGROUND

An especially significant event in the patient-oncologist relationship is the initial consultation, where many complex topics-diagnosis, treatment intent, and often, prognosis-are discussed in a relatively short period of time. This study aimed to measure patients' understanding of the information discussed during their first medical oncology visit and their satisfaction with the communication from medical oncologists.

METHODS

Between January and August 2021, patients without prior systemic treatment of their gastrointestinal malignancy (GI) attending the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (PMCC) were approached within 24 h of their initial consultation to complete a paper-based questionnaire assessing understanding of their disease (diagnosis, treatment plan/intent, and prognosis) and satisfaction with the consultation. Medical oncology physicians simultaneously completed a similar questionnaire about the information discussed at the initial visit. Matched patient-physician responses were compared to assess the degree of concordance.

RESULTS

A total of 184 matched patient-physician surveys were completed. The concordance rates for understanding of diagnosis, treatment plan, treatment intent, and prognosis were 92.9%, 59.2%, 66.8%, and 59.8%, respectively. After adjusting for patient and physician variables, patients who reported treatment intent to be unclear at the time of the consultation were independently associated with lower satisfaction scores (global p = 0.014). There was no statistically significant association between patient satisfaction and whether prognosis was disclosed (p = 0.08).

CONCLUSION

An in-depth conversation as to what treatment intent and prognosis means is reasonable during the initial medical oncology consultation to ensure patients and caregivers have a better understanding about their cancer.

Communication preferences and perceptions of cancer patient during their first medical oncology appointment

BACKGROUND

The first medical oncology appointment serves as a platform for patients to comprehend their diagnosis and prognostic implications of cancer. This study aimed to determine patients' communication preferences during their first medical oncology appointment and to assess the disparities between patients' preferences and perceptions.

METHODS

A total of 169 cancer patients participated by completing the Communication in First Medical Oncology Appointment Questionnaire (C-FAQ), a two-section questionnaire designed to assess patients' preferences and perceptions regarding Content (information provided and its extent), Facilitation (timing and location of information delivery), and Support (emotional support) during their first medical oncology appointment. A comparative analysis was conducted to assess the variations between preferences and perceptions.

RESULTS

Content emerged as the most significant dimension compared to Facilitation and Support. The physician's knowledge, honesty, and ability to provide clear information were considered the most important attributes. Patients evaluated most of their preferences as "very important". Patients' perception of the communication dimensions present during their appointment was below preferences for 11 items, indicating significant discrepancies in clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients highly valued their preferences concerning Content, Facilitation, and Support dimensions of communication. However, patient preferences were more prominently oriented towards the Content dimension. The discrepancies between preferences and perceptions should be viewed as an opportunity for enhancing communication skills through training.

Extraction, Labeling, Clustering, and Semantic Mapping of Segments From Clinical Notes

This work is motivated by the scarcity of tools for accurate, unsupervised information extraction from unstructured clinical notes in computationally underrepresented languages, such as Czech. We introduce a stepping stone to a broad array of downstream tasks such as summarisation or integration of individual patient records, extraction of structured information for national cancer registry reporting or building of semi-structured semantic patient representations that can be used for computing patient embeddings. More specifically, we present a method for unsupervised extraction of semantically-labeled textual segments from clinical notes and test it out on a dataset of Czech breast cancer patients, provided by Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute (the largest Czech hospital specialising exclusively in oncology). Our goal was to extract, classify (i.e. label) and cluster segments of the free-text notes that correspond to specific clinical features (e.g., family background, comorbidities or toxicities). Finally, we propose a tool for computer-assisted semantic mapping of segment types to pre-defined ontologies and validate it on a downstream task of category-specific patient similarity. The presented results demonstrate the practical relevance of the proposed approach for building more sophisticated extraction and analytical pipelines deployed on Czech clinical notes.

Comparison of the Structured Consent Process Using Modified Delphi Technique with the Standard Process in Obtaining Informed Consent for Procedures in ENT by PHASE III MBBS Students

Communication skill is a core competency and the training must begin in the undergraduate period itself. The Phase III MBBS students during their ENT posting are required to obtain informed consent for procedures and surgeries in ENT which forms the basis for efficient communication skills in house-surgency (internship) and residency. Informed consent taking is an important aspect and in the clinical postings, the teaching of communication skills along with history taking and physical examination can go a long way in making a strong foundation to good doctor patient relationships. This study aimed to compare the structured consent process using modified Delphi technique with the standard process in obtaining informed consent for procedures in ENT by PHASE III MBBS students. The need to sensitise the MBBS students on appropriate consent taking procedures with familiarisation of the essential elements of the Kalamazoo consensus statement were raised, accepted and final OSCE assessment attributes decided by the modified Delphi technique. The Modified Delphi technique is a unique means to obtain opinions of experts across the field in various spheres so as to identify lacunae if any in the existing teaching with means to reach a valid and reliable consensus. Our study included Phase III MBBS students posted to the Department of ENT, Govt Medical College Kozhikode during Jan-Feb 2022 wherein one batch of 30 students were taught with 2 classes on informed consent taking by the structured process obtained after Modified Delphi technique and included as; "MD" group and another batch of 30 students from the entire batch taught by the standard process was included as; "T" group respectively. After completion of the clinical postings an assessment was carried out with OSCE stations in Mar 2022; wherein 10 students were evaluated for each of the 6 common ENT procedures, 5 students from "T" group and 5 students from "MD" group respectively. Median total score of MD group was 6.5 (3.25-8) and median score of T group was 4.5 (2.25-6.75). The difference in mean ranks of these scores was statistically significant, p < 0.0001. The feedback assessment using the questionnaire with Likert scale had all 30(100%) students recommend this method of structured consent taking for enhancement of communications skills. However 20% of the students were not satisfied with the teaching learning method expressing the need for more time allocation and demonstrations. Informed consent taking requires the appropriate training in the undergraduate period itself as seen by the improved OSCE scores on assessment after teaching by the structured consent taking process as well as from the feedback of the students.

The information needs of people with degenerative cervical myelopathy: A qualitative study to inform patient education in clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Individuals with lifelong illnesses need access to adequate information about their condition to make optimal health decisions. Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy (DCM) is the most common form of spinal cord dysfunction in adults worldwide. Its chronic and debilitating nature, varied impact, clinical trajectory, and management options necessitate appropriate informational support to sustain effective clinical and self-directed care strategies. However, before clinicians can meet patients' information needs, they must first have an understanding of their baseline requirements. This study explores the information needs of people with DCM (PwCM). In doing so, it provides a starting point for the development of patient education and knowledge management strategies in clinical practice.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews with PwCM were conducted using an interview guide. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis according to Braun and Clarke's six-phase approach was used to analyse the data. Findings were reported according to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) guidelines.

RESULTS

Twenty PwCM (65% female, 35% male), with ages ranging from 39 to 74 years old participated in the interviews. The findings indicated that the provision of information to PwCM during clinical interactions varies. Accordingly, PwCM's information needs were broad-ranging, as was the nature of the information they found useful. Three main themes were identified (1) Variation in the provision of information to PwCM during clinical interactions, (2) Variations in the information needs of PwCM, and (3) Information that PwCM find useful.

CONCLUSION

Efforts must turn to adequately educating patients at the time of the clinical encounter. A comprehensive and consistent patient-centered information exchange in DCM is necessary to achieve this.

Physicians' perception of health topics covered by traditional media in Morocco: opinion of physicians as consumers of the media

Introduction

In Morocco, the traditional media allows messages of non-scientific prescriptions for the treatment of diseases and statements criticizing doctors to pass, which are considered by doctors as defamation and attacks on the honor of the medical profession. The aim of this study was to analyze physicians' perception in Morocco regarding health topics in the traditional media (TM).

Methods

This is a descriptive transversal study of physicians practicing in Morocco. The data were collected using a questionnaire that included questions on reliability, speed, up-to-dateness and influence of TM, also trust and interest in TM, quantity, and quality of health messages in TM.

Results

A total of 417 physicians responded, among them 234 (56.1%) had little or no interest in health topics in TM; 248 (59.5%) considered the quantity of transmitted messages to be low; 234 (56.1%) considered that health messages in TM are of low quality; 248 (59.5%) had little or no trust in health topics in TM. Also, three-quarters, 314 (75.3%), of the physicians recognized a moderate to strong influence of TM on health behaviors.

Conclusions

Our results show that physicians have a perception that seems negative towards TM. This may partially explain the chronic tension situation between physicians and journalists/media in Morocco. To better understand this situation and improve this relationship in favor of health promotion, it is necessary to conduct a research addressing the opinion of journalists and the propositions of solutions of both parties.

A complex communication skills training program for physicians providing advanced cancer care - content development and barriers and solutions for implementation

Background: Early integration of oncology and patient-centered palliative care is the recommended clinical practice model for patients with advanced cancer. General and specific communication skills are necessary to achieve integrated patient-centered care, but require organized training to be adequately mastered. Challenges and barriers on several levels, i.e. organizational, professional and individual may, however, hamper implementation. The development, implementation, and evaluation of such an educational program focusing on communication skills contain many steps, considerations and lessons learned, which are described in this article.Methods: A multi-professional faculty developed, implemented, and evaluated an educational program through a 5-step approach. The program was part of a Norwegian cluster-randomized controlled trial aiming to test the effect of early integration of oncology and palliative care for patients with advanced cancer.Results: The result is the PALLiON educational program; a multi-faceted, evidence-based, and learner-centered program with a specific focus on physicians' communication skills. Four modules were developed: lectures, discussion groups, skills training, and coaching. These were implemented at the six intervention hospitals using different teaching strategies. Evaluation in a subgroup of participants showed a positive appraisal of the group discussions and skills training.Conclusion:We present our experiences and reflections regarding implementation and lessons learned, which should be considered in future developments and implementations; (1) Include experienced faculty with various backgrounds, (2) Be both evidence-based and learner-centered, (3) Choose teaching strategies wisely, (4) Expect resistance and skepticism, (5) Team up with management and gatekeepers, (6) Expect time to fly, and (7) Plan thorough assessment of the evaluation and effect.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03088202.

Delivering Prognostic News to Older People with Chronic Disease: What Format Preference and Level of Involvement in Decision Making? A Hospital Survey

Shared decision making near end of life is a balancing act of communicating prognosis to patients and their surrogates/families and engaging them in considering value-concordant management choices. This cross-sectional survey aimed to determine the format in which older patients with chronic illnesses would prefer to receive prognostic information on their treatment options and disease progression, and their desired level of engagement in decision making. With a 60% participation rate, 139 inpatients in two hospitals and five surrogates were presented with six hypothetical scenarios with a randomly assigned sequence: verbal and written summary, graph, table, photo, video, and pamphlet. The majority (76%) of respondents chose the traditional verbal communication of prognosis by their doctor with a written summary as a reference and to share with family; the second choice was a condition-specific pamphlet (63%). Many found the graph and photo to be distressing (36% and 42%, respectively). Most (71%) wanted to know everything about their condition trajectory, and 63% chose shared decision making rather than completely autonomous or full delegation to clinicians or family. There were no gender differentials between wanting to know it all, supporting shared decision making or the preferred format for breaking news (p > 0.05). Older hospitalized patients with chronic conditions are willing to discuss end-of-life issues, learn about their prognosis, and be involved in shared decision making. Innovative formats such as graphs, videos, or photos were not welcome as part of the prognostic discussion.

Public information needs during the COVID-19 outbreak: a qualitative study in mainland China

Purpose

The impact of COVID-19 has led to a surge in the public’s reliance on the Internet for pandemic information, and the policy of home isolation has exacerbated this. This study aimed to investigate public information needs and ways of accessing and disseminating information during COVID-19 in mainland China.

Design/methodology/approach

This study used a qualitative research approach to conduct semi-structured interviews with 15 participants from 9 cities in mainland China about information needs and access behaviors during the COVID-19 outbreak. All interview recordings were converted into text and proofread, then coded and summarised in correspondence with the research questions using the grounded theory.

Findings

This study summarized the dynamics of public information needs during the 2.5-year pandemic and identified the difficulties in accessing certain information.

Originality/value

Although information needs of public health emergencies have been a hot topic during COVID-19, scant studies focus on information needs in specific countries in Asia, especially in mainland China, the first country with a major outbreak and stringent lockdown mandates. Therefore, the current study is well enriched by focusing on information demand behavior in the context of COVID-19. Possible measures for improvement were also given to existing and potential problems, taking into account the participants’ views.

Retention of discharge instructions using an interdisciplinary model for at-risk children with cancer: A quality improvement initiative

PURPOSE

We sought to improve caregiver retention of critical initial hospital discharge instructions using a multidisciplinary, team-based intervention for newly diagnosed pediatric cancer patients at high risk for unfavorable outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multidisciplinary team of pediatric residents, nurses, social workers, pharmacists and hematology/oncology faculty implemented practices to optimize teaching of key discharge material as part of four Plan-Do-Study-Act intervention cycles. An 11-question survey distributed at the first post-discharge clinic visit assessed the efficacy of the intervention, as defined by caregiver retention of critical home instructions.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine caregivers of pediatric cancer patients in an urban academic tertiary-care children's hospital took part in this project. Overall retention of key discharge information was greater in the post-intervention cohort compared to the baseline cohort (median total scores: 89 and 63, respectively; p = .001). Improvements in the proportions of correct responses post-intervention were also observed across all subject matters: from 0.57 to 0.88 for fever guidelines (p = .059), from 0.71 to 0.78 for signs of sepsis (p = .65), from 0.57 to 1.00 for accurate choice of on-call number (p = .004), and from 0.71 to 0.94 for antiemetic management (p = .14).

CONCLUSION

Initiation of our comprehensive cancer-specific program to improve caregiver retention of discharge instructions at the first post-hospitalization clinic visit has been successful and sustainable. This project demonstrated that a multi-disciplinary collaborative team effort increases caregiver retention of critical health information, and this has potential to lead to improved outcomes for patients.

Translating evidence in a priority setting partnership: knowledge gaps between healthcare providers and oesophageal cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

Despite the fact that health information is now more accessible than ever, knowledge gaps remain between patients and healthcare providers (HCPs). To date, the patients' need for information following a diagnosis of oesophageal cancer has not been adequately met.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to identify why knowledge gaps exist between oesophageal cancer patients and HCPs and how to address them.

METHODS

Purposive sampling of a group of people living with and after oesophageal cancer who had participated in a priority-setting partnership where 45% of questions from patients had existing evidence-based answers. A 7-set question series was developed for use in a patient/HCP focus group in addition to 11 individual phone interviews with survivors of oesophageal cancer. Qualitative semistructured interviews were conducted to explore oesophageal cancer patients' access to information. The data was analysed thematically, which involved coding all patient transcripts before identifying and reviewing key themes.

RESULTS

The three primary themes that emerged were as follows: opportunity (HCP team factors and relationship development), ability (patient factors) and priority (pacing of information delivery).

CONCLUSION

Effective communication between patients and HCPs was identified as an integral component of the enhancement of patient knowledge. HCPs should continue to refine and improve methods of information delivery and encourage conversations regarding information preferences.

Physician-directed information prescription service. A scoping review

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review aims to identify and map the characteristics of research studies, types, delivery methods, and team members of physician-directed information prescription services.

METHODS

Following the PRISMA-ScR checklist, a systematic search was performed on Web of Science, Scopus, Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts (LISTA), and PubMed/Medline from 1990 to 2021.

RESULTS

37 studies were included in the final analysis. Five types of providing information prescription were recognized: typical, oral, web-based, electronic, and mixed methods. Physicians, nurses, and librarians were the most agreed-upon professionals in information prescription delivery teams. The steps of prescribing information were needs assessment, content production, information evaluation, prescribing information, follow-up, and documentation.

DISCUSSION

This review presents a synthesis of the process of information prescription. It is suggested to determine the effective information prescription type, provide methods and develop the service according to patients' preferences and characteristics.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Results of this study can be used to identify the challenges, the competent individuals, roles, and steps of information prescription service, as well as design and develop the protocol, model, and flowchart of it.

Pretending to care

On one hand, it is commonly accepted that clinicians should not deceive their patients, yet on the other there are many instances in which deception could be in a patient's best interest. In this paper, I propose that this conflict is in part driven by a narrow conception of deception as contingent on belief. I argue that we cannot equate non-deceptive care solely with introducing or sustaining a patient's true belief about their condition or treatment, because there are many instances of clinical care which are non-doxastic and non-deceptive. Inasmuch as this is true, better understanding of non-doxastic attitudes, such as hope and pretence, could improve our understanding of deception in clinical practice.

AYAs' online information and eHealth needs: A comparison with healthcare professionals' perceptions

BACKGROUND

Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) diagnosed with cancer fulfill their cancer-related information needs often via the Internet. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) have a crucial role in guiding patients in finding appropriate online information and eHealth sources, a role that is often overlooked. Misperceptions of AYAs' needs by HCPs may lead to suboptimal guidance. We aimed to examine the extent to which AYAs' online information and eHealth needs corresponded with HCPs' perceptions of these needs.

METHODS

Two cross-sectional online surveys (AYAs, n = 299; HCP, n = 80) on online information and eHealth needs were conducted. HCPs provided indications of their perceptions of AYA's needs.

RESULTS

AYAs reported significantly more online information needs compared with HCPs' perceptions regarding: survival rates (AYA = 69%, HCP = 35%, p < 0.001), treatment guidelines (AYA = 65%, HCP = 41%, p < 0.001), return of cancer (AYA = 76%, HCP = 59%, p = 0.004), "what can I do myself" (AYA = 68%, HCP = 54%, p = 0.029), and metastases (AYA = 64%, HCP = 50%, p = 0.040). Significantly more unmet eHealth needs were reported by AYAs compared with HCPs relating to access to own test results (AYA = 25, HCP = 0%, p < 0.001), request tests (AYA = 30%, HCP = 7%, p < 0.001), medical information (AYA = 22%, HCP = 0%, p = 0.001), e-consult with nurses (AYA = 30%, HCP = 10%, p < 0.001), e-consult with physicians (AYA = 38%, HCP = 13%, p = 0.001), and request prescriptions (AYA = 33%, HCP = 21%, p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

AYAs' online information and eHealth needs are partially discrepant with the impression HCPs have, which could result in insufficient guidance related to AYAs' needs. AYAs and HCPs should get guidance regarding where to find optimal information in a language they understand. This may contribute to AYAs' access, understanding, and satisfaction regarding online information and eHealth.

Examining Anxiety Treatment Information Needs: Web-Based Survey Study

BACKGROUND

Several treatments for anxiety are available, which can make treatment decisions difficult. Resources are often produced with limited knowledge of what information is of interest to consumers. This is a problem because there is limited understanding of what people want to know when considering help for anxiety.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine the information needs and preferences concerning treatment options for anxiety by assessing the following: what information people consider to be important when they are considering treatment options for anxiety, what information people have received on psychological and medication treatment in the past, how they received this information in the past, and whether there are any differences in information needs between specific samples and demographic groups.

METHODS

Using a web-based survey, we recruited participants from a peer-support association website (n=288) and clinic samples (psychology, n=113; psychiatry, n=64).

RESULTS

Participants in all samples wanted information on a broad range of topics pertaining to anxiety treatment. However, they reported that they did not receive the desired amount of information. Participants in the clinic samples rated the importance of information topics higher than did those in the self-help sample. When considering the anxiety treatment information received in the past, most respondents indicated receiving information from informational websites, family doctors, and mental health practitioners. In terms of what respondents want to learn about, high ratings of importance were given to topics concerning treatment effectiveness, how it works, advantages and disadvantages, what happens when it stops, and common side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

It is challenging for individuals to obtain anxiety-related information on the range of topics they desire through currently available information sources. It is also difficult to provide comprehensive information during typical clinical visits. Providing evidence-based information on the web and in a brochure format may help consumers make informed choices and support the advice provided by health professionals.

Los deseos de información en pacientes con cáncer avanzado

Objetivo: Comprobar los deseos de información, y las variables asociadas a ello, en los pacientes con cáncer avanzado atendidos por un Equipo de Soporte Hospitalario de Cuidados Paliativos. Método: Noventa pacientes con cáncer avanzado, fueron evaluados, mediante una entrevista estructurada sobre si tenían información sobre su enfermedad de los siguientes tipos: diagnóstico, curación, gravedad, objetivos del tratamiento y final de vida, y de su deseo de tener información en cada uno de esto cinco tipos de información. Además, se recogieron los datos sociodemográficos y clínicos, y se administraron: la Escala de Capacidad Funcional, el Índice de Comorbilidad de Charlson, y la Escala de Ansiedad y Depresión Hospitalaria. Resultados. Los resultados muestraron que la mayoría de los pacientes estaban informados del diagnóstico, y de la gravedad, pero no de los objetivos de tratamiento, la curación y el final de vida. De los pacientes no informados el 77,8% (14) deseaban conocer el diagnostico, el 60,0% (11) la gravedad, el 77,8% (35) el objetivo del tratamiento, el 76,7% (24) la curación y un 34,4% (10) el final de vida. Las variables asociadas al deseo de: a) información diagnóstica fueron: tener un cuidador principal más joven (p=,023); con pareja (p=,018), no religiosos (p=,025) y mayor número de visitas a urgencias (p=,004); b) información sobre gravedad fueron: ser joven (p=,009); con pareja (p=,04), y mejor estado ánimo (p=,009); c). Información sobre objetivos del tratamiento: ser joven (p=,001), Con pareja (p=,04), mejor estado ánimo (p=,001). d) información sobre curación: ser hombre (p=,018), con pareja (p=,04), no religiosos (p=,023). En el caso de información sobre el tiempo de vida no se encontró ninguna diferencia significativa. Conclusiones: es necesario valorar los deseos información que tienen los pacientes de forma individualizada y en las diferentes variables de información, y por ello la creación de una herramienta estandarizada en futuras investigaciones es una prioridad. La mayoría de los pacientes con cáncer avanzado están informados del diagnóstico y gravedad, pero existe un déficit de información en curación, objetivos del tratamiento y especialmente en la información del final de vida y destaca más aun, que un alto porcentaje de los pacientes no informados sí desearían recibir información, principalmente sobre los objetivos del tratamiento, sobre todo los más jóvenes, con pareja y no religiosos y con mejor estado de ánimo. Una calidad asistencial óptima en pacientes con cáncer avanzado requiere cubrir sus deseos de información.

Older adults’ mental health information preferences: a call for more balanced information to empower older adults’ mental health help-seeking

A small minority of older adults seek psychological help when they need it. Barriers to mental health service use among older adults include low mental health literacy and reduced opportunities for shared decision-making in health care. There is a gap in the literature examining the mental health information preferences of older adults. The objectives of this study were to describe the information preferences and predictors of preferences among older adults. In total, 229 adults aged 50 years and older in central Canada responded to a questionnaire investigating socio-demographic, psycho-social and health-related characteristics, as well as mental health information preferences. Descriptive analysis quantified participants’ ratings of information preferences and hierarchical linear regression analysis determined predictors of their preferences. Older adults rated all mental health content items as very important. Most participants preferred detailed information (two to six pages) on all treatment options (psychological, pharmacological, combined and self-help). Older adults significantly preferred discussion with a heath-care provider and written information, in comparison to other formats. Older adults also significantly preferred to consult family, friends and heath-care professionals over other sources. Socio-demographic and psycho-social characteristics accounted for some of the variance in predicting older adults’ information preferences. Findings highlight older adults’ desire to be involved in decisions concerning mental health supports. Providing balanced information concerning mental health treatment may increase empowerment in mental health help-seeking.

RETRACTED: Psychological needs and associated factors among perioperative patients with oral cancer

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy). This article has been retracted at the request of the Editor-in-Chief, as well as the authors. After concerns about research data were raised by a reader, the journal's editorial board requested a response from the authors, who confirmed errors in analysing and editing the original data. Specifically, a series of 104 survey entries were duplicated during data input. Therefore the authors and the Editor required a retraction of the article.

Communicating bad news of COVID-19: An empirical study of patients' preferences in India

The study aims to assess patients' preferences regarding physicians communicating bad news of COVID-19. Based on the data collected from 74 patients with COVID-19 in India, this study assesses "how" patients want bad news to be delivered. Key aspects of the physician-patient interaction were identified from the literature. Regression tests proved that three main constructs contribute significantly toward patient outcomes. Content of the message and facilitation were most crucial, however too much emotional support was not desirable by patients. Also, the patient's gender and educational background should be considered before breaking bad news . Thus, to increase patient compliance full disclosure and patient-centered methods of communication can be used.

Medical Oncology Care Plan: a tool for improving the provision of clinical information to patients

Improving clinical communication between patient and clinician through the provision of written information empowers patients to make informed decisions, underpinning patient-centred care and leading to greater health outcomes. The Townsville Cancer Centre has formulated a holistic care plan template for each patient as a tool to enhance this communication. Using questionnaire-based and qualitative surveys, understanding of the patient's cancer and perspectives of clinicians were examined. The results demonstrate that patients generally have a firm knowledge base of their disease with the predominant finding being that patients wish to be more informed with written information about their diagnosis and alternatives for treatment. While initially time consuming, completion of care plans had many benefits for clinicians; they prompted them to collect holistic information, engage in discussions to capture patient goals and document details about prognosis, treatment options and management of side-effects. Medical oncology care plans provide a sustainable method to provide clinicians a practical template to gather vital information and encourage patients to participate in the decision-making process for healthcare.

Patients With Cancer Searching for Cancer- or Health-Specific Web-Based Information: Performance Test Analysis

Background

Searching the internet for cancer-related information helps patients with cancer satisfy their unmet information needs and empowers them to play a more active role in the management of their disease. However, to benefit from the search, patients need a sufficient level of skill to search, select, appraise, and apply web-based health information.

Objective

We aim to study the operational, navigational, information, and evaluation skills and problems of patients with cancer performing cancer-related search tasks using the internet.

Methods

A total of 21 patients with cancer were recruited during their stay at the rehabilitation clinic for oncological rehabilitation. Participants performed eight cancer-related search tasks using the internet. The participants were asked to think aloud while performing the tasks, and the screen activities were recorded. The types and frequencies of performance problems were identified and coded into categories following an inductive coding process. In addition, the performance and strategic characteristics of task execution were summarized descriptively.

Results

All participants experienced problems or difficulties in executing the tasks, and a substantial percentage of tasks (57/142, 40.1%) could not be completed successfully. The participants’ performance problems were coded into four categories, namely operating the computer and web browser, navigating and orientating, using search strategies, and evaluating the relevance and reliability of web-based information. The most frequent problems occurred in the third and fourth categories. A total of 90% (19/21) of participants used nontask-related search terms or nonspecific search terms. A total of 95% (20/21) of participants did not control for the source or topicality of the information found. In addition, none of the participants verified the information on 1 website with that on another website for each task.

Conclusions

A substantial group of patients with cancer did not have the necessary skills to benefit from cancer-related internet searches. Future interventions are needed to support patients in the development of sufficient internet-searching skills, focusing particularly on information and evaluation skills.

Knowledge of a cancer diagnosis is a protective factor for the survival of patients with breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The health burden of breast cancer is rising in China. The effect of informed diagnosis on long-term survival is not fully understood. This retrospective cohort study aims to explore the association between early informed diagnosis and survival time in breast cancer patients.

METHODS

A total of 12,327 breast cancer patients were enrolled between October 2002 and December 2016. Potential factors, including knowing the cancer diagnosis status, sex, age, clinical stage, surgery history, grade of reporting hospital and diagnostic year were, analyzed. We followed up all participants every 6 months until June 2017. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the clinicopathologic characteristics between patients who knew their diagnosis and those who did not.

RESULTS

By June 2017, 18.04% of the participants died of breast cancer. Before PSM, both the 3-year and 5-year survival rates of patients who knew their cancer diagnosis were longer (P < 0.001). After PSM, the above conclusion was still established. By stratified analysis, except for the subgroups of male patients and stage III patients, patients who knew their diagnosis showed a better prognosis in all the other subgroups (P < 0.05). Cox regression analysis showed that knowing a cancer diagnosis was an independent risk factor for survival in breast cancer patients (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Being aware of their cancer diagnosis plays a protective role in extending the survival time of breast cancer patients, which suggests that medical staff and patients' families should disclose the cancer diagnosis to patients in a timely manner. Further prospective studies need to be made to validate our findings.

Anxiety is associated with unfulfilled information needs and pain at the informed consent consultation of spine surgery patients: a longitudinal study

PURPOSE

Meeting the information needs of patients adequately is of high importance in informed consent consultations in surgery. However, information needs often remain unmet in the informed consent consultation. The aim of this study was to assess anxiety and pain in relation to the patients' information needs fulfillment perioperatively.

METHODS

We applied a question prompt list (QPL) for patients undergoing spine surgery (SN-QPL) before (t1) and a question answering list (SN-QAL) after (t2) the informed consent consultation. The patients additionally completed the "State-Trait Anxiety Operation Inventory" (STOA, cognitive and affective scale) at t1, as well as a pain numerical rating scale (NRS) at t2 and postoperative (t3). We analyzed (1) the association between anxiety, information needs and pain and (2) anxiety and pain scores regarding information needs fulfillment after the consent consultation.

RESULTS

A total of n = 118 patients was included. Affective and cognitive state anxiety was only reduced postoperatively (affective p < .001, cognitive p < .05). The higher trait anxiety was, the more patients longed for information at t1-t3 (t1: r = .58/r = .74, each p < .001), (t2: r = .38/r = .49, each p < .001) and (t3: r = .29, p < .01/r = 34, p < .001). Higher grades of trait anxiety resulted in lower information needs fulfilment. Higher state anxiety levels were associated with higher pain levels. Information needs more often remained unfulfilled in high trait and state anxiety patients.

CONCLUSION

Patients' anxiety was associated with (un)fulfilled information needs. Meeting information needs should be optimized in the process of surgeon-patient communication. Adapting the information to the patients' anxiety levels seem to be an effective way to reduce anxiety.

Preconsultation Educational Group Intervention Can Address the Knowledge Gap in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Whether to undergo postmastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) is a challenging, preference-sensitive decision. It is therefore paramount to optimize decision quality through ensuring patients' knowledge and aligning treatments with their personal preferences. This study assessed the effects of a preconsultation educational group intervention (PEGI) on patient knowledge, state-trait anxiety, and decisional conflict (patient uncertainty in decision making) during the decision-making process.

METHODS

This phase 3 randomized controlled trial assessed effects of a PEGI in women without active breast cancer undergoing delayed PMBR, or prophylactic mastectomy with immediate PMBR. Both groups underwent routine education before consultation. In addition, the intervention group underwent a PEGI composed of presentations from a plastic surgeon and nurse, a value clarification exercise, and shared experiences from PMBR patients before the consultation with the plastic surgeon. Before and 1-week after consultation, outcome measures were assessed using the Decisional Conflict Scale, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and the BREAST-Q.

RESULTS

Of the 219 women deemed eligible, a total of 156 women were recruited and randomized. Treatment fidelity was 96% and retention was 88%. At baseline, there were no significant differences in terms of demographic or clinical status, knowledge, state-trait anxiety, and decisional conflict. Patient knowledge about PMBR improved in both groups; however, the degree of knowledge attainment was significantly greater in the PEGI group (24.5% improvement in the intervention group compared with 13.5% in the routine education group, P < 0.001). The reduction in decisional conflict from baseline to follow-up was greater in the intervention group compared with the routine education; however, the difference only approached significance (P = 0.09).

CONCLUSIONS

The provision of a preconsultation educational group intervention has been shown to significantly close the knowledge gap on PMBR in patients seeking delayed breast reconstruction or prophylactic mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction compared with routine education alone.

Oncologists' Communication About Uncertain Information in Second Opinion Consultations: A Focused Qualitative Analysis

Introduction: Uncertainty is omnipresent in cancer care, including the ambiguity of diagnostic tests, efficacy and side effects of treatments, and/or patients' long-term prognosis. During second opinion consultations, uncertainty may be particularly tangible: doubts and uncertainty may drive patients to seek more information and request a second opinion, whereas the second opinion in turn may also affect patients' level of uncertainty. Providers are tasked to clearly discuss all of these uncertainties with patients who may feel overwhelmed by it. The aim of this study was to explore how oncologists communicate about uncertainty during second opinion consultations in medical oncology. Methods: We performed a secondary qualitative analysis of audio-recorded consultations collected in a prospective study among cancer patients (N = 69) who sought a second opinion in medical oncology. We purposively selected 12 audio-recorded second opinion consultations. Any communication about uncertainty by the oncologist was double coded by two researchers and an inductive analytic approach was chosen to allow for novel insights to arise. Results: Seven approaches in which oncologists conveyed or addressed uncertainty were identified: (1) specifying the degree of uncertainty, (2) explaining reasons of uncertainty, (3) providing personalized estimates of uncertainty to patients, (4) downplaying or magnifying uncertainty, (5) reducing or counterbalancing uncertainty, and (6) providing support to facilitate patients in coping with uncertainty. Moreover, oncologists varied in their (7) choice of words/language to convey uncertainty (i.e., "I" vs. "we"; level of explicitness). Discussion: This study identified various approaches of how oncologists communicated uncertain issues during second opinion consultations. These different approaches could affect patients' perception of uncertainty, emotions provoked by it, and possibly even patients' behavior. For example, by minimizing uncertainty, oncologists may (un)consciously steer patients toward specific medical decisions). Future research is needed to examine how these different ways of communicating about uncertainty affect patients. This could also facilitate a discussion about the desirability of certain communication strategies. Eventually, practical and evidence-based guidance needs to be developed for clinicians to optimally inform patients about uncertain issues and support patients in dealing with these.

Italian onco-haematological patients' preferences in bad news communication: a preliminary investigation

BACKGROUND

The manner in which bad news is communicated in oncological contexts can affect patients' engagement, their coping strategies and therapeutic compliance. Although this topic has been broadly investigated since the nineties, to the best of our knowledge, little has been written about Italian patients' experiences and preferences concerning what the oncologists should disclose and how they should intimate patients about their health conditions in different stages of oncological disease.

METHODS

In an attempt to fill this gap, an online self-report questionnaire was administered to a sample of Italian onco-haematological patients. Data were analysed both qualitatively (by a content analysis) and quantitatively (by descriptive analysis and Generalized Linear Mixed Model).

RESULTS

While the majority of patients elected to know the truth during their clinical course, a polarisation between those arguing that the truth be fully disclosed and those claiming that the truth be communicated in a personalised way was observed at the attitude level. Among demographic variables accounted for, age seems to most affect patients' preferences. Indeed, younger Italian patients decidedly reject concealment of the truth, even when justified by the beneficence principle. This result could be a reaction to some protective and paternalistic behaviours, but it could even reflect a relation according to which the more the age increases the more the fear of knowing rises, or an intergenerational change due to different ways of accessing the information. The qualitative analysis of the final open-ended question revealed three main sources of problems in doctor-patient encounters: scarcity of time, absence of empathy and use of not-understandable language that makes it difficult for patients to assume a more active role.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study, which represents a preliminary step in the subject investigation, will be deployed for the construction and validation of a more sophisticated questionnaire. Better awareness of the Italian onco-haematological patients' preferences concerning bad news communication and truth-telling could be useful in adopting more suitable medical practices and improving doctor-patient relationships.

Information needs for recovery after colorectal surgery: a patient focus group study

AIM

The provision of information to patients is an important part of recovery after colorectal surgery. This study aimed to define patient information needs, barriers to effective understanding and insights into how information provision may be improved.

METHOD

A patient focus group was convened. This comprised a broad, convenience sample of 11 participants from across the United Kingdom with experience of major colorectal surgery. A semistructured topic guide was used to facilitate discussion about previous experiences of information provision and how this may be improved. Data were analysed thematically and are presented as major themes.

RESULTS

Overall, participants felt that their information needs are poorly prioritized by healthcare professionals. Barriers to understanding and retaining information include highly emotional situations (such as receiving bad news) and inappropriate information design (such as the use of inaccessible language). Participants expressed how information resources should: (a) address patients' individual information needs; (b) empower patients to take an active role in their recovery; (c) support patients with meaningful education and sign-posted resources; and (d) recognize patients' heightened need for information during recovery at home.

CONCLUSION

This study provides key insights into the information needs of patients undergoing colorectal surgery. These should inform the development of future information resources, whose format, timing and design are currently supported by low-quality evidence.