Changes in lipoprotein(a) levels measured by six kit methods during growth hormone treatment of growth hormone-deficient adults

Supporting evidence for lipoprotein(a) measurements in clinical practice

High levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] are causal for development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and highly regulated by genetics. Levels are higher in Blacks compared to Whites, and in women compared to men. Lp(a)'s main protein components are apolipoprotein (apo) (a) and apoB100, the latter being the main component of Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) particles. Studies have identified Lp(a) to be associated with inflammatory, coagulation and wound healing pathways. Lack of validated and accepted assays to measure Lp(a), risk cutoff values, guidelines for diagnosis, and targeted therapies have added challenges to the field. Scientific efforts are ongoing to address these, including studies evaluating the cardiovascular benefits of decreasing Lp(a) levels with targeted apo(a) lowering treatments. This review will provide a synopsis of evidence-based effects of high Lp(a) on disease presentation, highlight available guidelines and discuss promising therapies in development. We will conclude with current clinical information and future research needs in the field.

The impact of race and ethnicity on lipoprotein(a) levels and cardiovascular risk

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a plasma circulating apoB100 (apoB) containing lipoprotein. It has a unique glycoprotein bound to the apoB100, apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)]. The majority of the population expresses two apo(a) isoforms, when bound to apoB100 they create two circulating Lp(a) particles. Lp(a) levels are genetically determined and epidemiological studies have established elevated levels of Lp(a) to be a causal risk factor of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Lp(a) levels differ across racial groups and Blacks of Sub-Saharan decent have higher levels when compared to white. In comparison to white populations, studies in minorities are less represented in the published literature. Additionally, there is a lack of standardization in the commercial assays used to measured Lp(a) levels, and hence it is difficult to assess risk based on individual Lp(a) levels, but risk seems to occur in the upper percentiles of the population.

RECENT FINDINGS

A recent study using data from the UK biobank highlights the racial differences in Lp(a) levels and the increase risk in CVD amongst all races.

SUMMARY

This review will highlight Lp(a) biology and physiology with a focus on available data from racially diverse cohorts. There is a need to perform studies in diverse populations to understand if they are at higher risk than whites are.

[Current aspects of diagnosis and treatment of adult GH-deficiency]

Adult growth hormone (GH) deficiency (AGHD) is a condition characterized by alterations in body composition, lipid and carbohydrate metabolism, bone mineral density and poor quality of life; however, clinical presentations of AGHD are mostly non-specific. Untreated AGHD is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Stimulation tests are used for the diagnosis: insulin tolerance test, glucagon stimulation test, growth-hormone releasing hormone and arginine stimulation test. Moreover, in 2017 FDA approved the use of macimorelin (oral GH secretagogue) for the diagnosis of AGHD. In childhood GH-deficiency, apolipoprotein A-IV, CFHR4 (complement factor H-related protein 4) and PBP (platelet basic protein) were identified as potential biomarkers of the disease, however, this was not investigated in AGHD. GH treatment starts from the minimal dose, which allows minimizing the adverse effects. According to published meta-analyses, AGHD treatment generally does not lead to increased risk of malignancy and recurrence of sellar neoplasms in adult patients. Published data on GH receptor polymorphism associations with treatment efficacy remains controversial. Development of long-acting GH formulations is a currect perspective for the increase of treatment compliance.

Is Lp(a) ready for prime time use in the clinic? A pros-and-cons debate

Lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) is a cholesterol-rich lipoprotein known since 1963. In spite of extensive research on Lp(a), there are still numerous gaps in our knowledge relating to its function, biosynthesis and catabolism. One reason for this might be that apo(a), the characteristic glycoprotein of Lp(a), is expressed only in primates. Results from experiments using transgenic animals therefore may need verification in humans. Studies on Lp(a) are also handicapped by the great number of isoforms of apo(a) and the heterogeneity of apo(a)-containing fractions in plasma. Quantification of Lp(a) in the clinical laboratory for a long time has not been standardized. Starting from its discovery, reports accumulated that Lp(a) contributed to the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke. Early reports were based on case control studies but in the last decades a great deal of prospective studies have been published that highlight the increased risk for CVD and MI in patients with elevated Lp(a). Final answers to the question of whether Lp(a) is ready for wider clinical use will come from intervention studies with novel selective Lp(a) lowering medications that are currently underway. This article expounds arguments for and against this proposition from currently available data.

Treatment with Growth Hormone for Adults with Growth Hormone Deficiency Syndrome: Benefits and Risks

Pharmacological treatment of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in adults began in clinical practice more than 20 years ago. Since then, a great volume of experience has been accumulated on its effects on the symptoms and biochemical alterations that characterize this hormonal deficiency. The effects on body composition, muscle mass and strength, exercise capacity, glucose and lipid profile, bone metabolism, and quality of life have been fully demonstrated. The advance of knowledge has also taken place in the biological and molecular aspects of the action of this hormone in patients who have completed longitudinal growth. In recent years, several epidemiological studies have reported interesting information about the long-term effects of GH replacement therapy in regard to the possible induction of neoplasms and the potential development of diabetes. In addition, GH hormone receptor polymorphism could potentially influence GH therapy. Long-acting GH are under development to create a more convenient GH dosing profile, while retaining the excellent safety, efficacy, and tolerability of daily GH. In this article we compile the most recent data of GH replacement therapy in adults, as well as the molecular aspects that may condition a different sensitivity to this treatment.

Lp(a) is not associated with diabetes but affects fibrinolysis and clot structure ex vivo

Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is a low density lipoprotein (LDL) with one apolipoprotein (a) molecule bound to the apolipoprotein B-100 of LDL. Lp(a) is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, the relationship of Lp(a) to diabetes and metabolic syndrome, both known for increased CVD risk, is controversial. In a population based study on type two diabetes mellitus (T2DM) development in women, Lp(a) plasma levels showed the well known skewed distribution without any relation to diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance. A modified clot lysis assay on a subset of 274 subjects showed significantly increased clot lysis times in T2DM subjects, despite inhibition of PAI-1 and TAFI. Lp(a) plasma levels significantly increased the maximal peak height of the clot lysis curve, indicating a change in clot structure. In this study Lp(a) is not related to the development of T2DM but may affect clot structure ex vivo without a prolongation of the clot lysis time.

Variability in the measurement of lipoprotein(a) in the British Isles

BACKGROUND

Elevated Lipoprotein(a) concentrations are a risk factor for coronary heart disease; however, methodological problems have prevented its introduction to routine clinical practice.

METHODS

Thirty-six laboratories each assayed 20 samples (the same 20 in each laboratory) using two different Lp(a) kits per laboratory, randomly assigned from the total of 12 used in the study.

RESULTS

The duplicate error, i.e. the error between-duplicate analyses for each sample, for all kits was small, indicating all kits had a good precision for all the assays. However, there was a very large variation between the kits in the Lp(a) concentration assigned to a sample that could be over 100%. All methods showed a negative or positive bias as the concentration of Lp(a) increased. Most worryingly, as used in this study, several Lp(a) kits detected Lp(a) in a solution of 5% bovine serum albumin in phosphate-buffered saline. The between-laboratory variation in Lp(a) concentration measured using the same kit was very large, e.g. for a sample with a mean concentration of 78.8 mg/dL Lp(a) the between-laboratory variation was 29.7 mg/dL (37.7%). Even with samples with a relatively low Lp(a) concentration of 16.0 mg/dL had a between-laboratory variation of 12.3 mg/dL (76.8%).

CONCLUSION

There is wide variability in reported Lp(a) concentrations, assayed in the same sample, using different Lp(a) assays. At the present time these differences prevent the use of Lp(a) as a routine diagnostic tool.

Safety and efficacy of growth hormone replacement therapy in adults

Limitless supplies of recombinant human growth hormone (GH) have been available for the last 20 years. During that period, studies have characterised the effects of GH deficiency in adults and the benefits of GH replacement therapy. Areas of greatest impairment and benefit are quality of life, skeletal health and cardiovascular risk factors including the serum lipid profile and body composition. By optimising GH replacement therapy at various stages of adult life, it is hoped that it will prevent the development of osteoporosis and reduce the mortality and morbidity associated with hypopituitarism. However, the primary indication for GH therapy in adults in England and Wales is quality of life. The benefits of GH treatment are sustained over several years, and long-term surveillance of patients continues.

Effects of GH replacement on metabolism and physical performance in GH deficient adults

GH deficiency (GHD) in adults is associated with abnormalities in body composition, metabolic derangements, sub-optimal physical performance, high incidence of adverse cardiovascular risk factors and poor quality of life. GHD adults are insulin resistant and have reduced hepatic glycogen stores, reduced insulin stimulated glucose utilization and reduced glycogen synthesis in muscle. GH replacement results in either no change or slight reduction in insulin sensitivity. Hence, it is important to monitor for the development of glucose intolerance in patients on long-term GH replacement. GHD is associated with a lipid profile known to predispose to premature atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease, i.e. increased total and LDL cholesterol, decreased HDL cholesterol, increased small dense LDL particles and increased triglycerides. LDL-cholesterol abnormalities appear to improve with GH replacement even if maintained within physiological dose range; the greatest improvement occurs in those subjects with higher baseline total and LDL cholesterol values and in female patients with adult onset GHD compared with male patients with childhood onset GHD. In contrast, hypertriglyceridaemia is not corrected by GH replacement. The majority of the reports suggest GH replacement increases Lipoprotein-a levels. Long-term observation will be required to determine whether GH replacement reduces cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in GHD adults. The reduced muscle mass and strength associated with GHD has been shown to improve after GH replacement. GH treatment also improves maximal and sub-maximal exercise performance in GHD adults. The effects on protein metabolism, energy expenditure and thyroid metabolism in GHD adults are also critical.

Long-term growth hormone replacement therapy in hypopituitary adults

Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in the adult has now been fully recognised as a clinical entity characterised by abnormal body composition, osteopenia, impaired quality of life, cardiac dysfunction and an adverse lipid profile. While short-term studies of GH replacement have demonstrated irrefutably a favourable effect on all if not most features of GHD, data on long-term administration spanning more than 2 years are still scarce. Experience of GH replacement up to 5 to 10 years indicate that the beneficial effects on body composition, predominantly a decrease in body fat and an increase in lean mass, is maintained during treatment. Long-term GH therapy also increases muscle strength and exercise performance. All data, with one exception, are consistent with a significant increase in bone mass during prolonged GH therapy. The most distinct effect on bone was observed in the worst affected individuals and in males. Improvement in quality of life is documented shortly after initiation of GH replacement and is maintained during long-term studies. This may explain the reduction in days of sick leave seen during GH therapy. The beneficial effect on cardiovascular risk factors is sustained over a prolonged period of time, revealing a reduction in intima wall thickness, and an improvement in serum lipid levels and clotting parameters. The increase in lipoprotein(a) levels with GH therapy in some studies may be disturbing, but difficulties in measuring this parameter and inconsistencies between the different studies makes it difficult to estimate its real impact. No data are yet available to show that GH replacement will normalise or even improve mortality rate and fracture rate. Adverse events associated with GH replacement therapy are mainly secondary to fluid retention as a result of excess dose administration. This can be adequately prevented by monitoring GH replacement according to serum insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I levels. From what is currently known, GH replacement does not increase the prevalence of diabetes mellitus, and does not induce new neoplasms or recurrence of the primary brain tumour; however, longer follow-up studies are needed to provide definitive answers. In conclusion, it appears not only that long-term GH replacement therapy in adults with GHD is a procedure that can be safely used, but that GH replacement should be considered as a possible life-long therapy in order to maintain its benefits.

Optimizing gh therapy in adults and children

Until the advent of modern neuroradiological imaging techniques in 1989, a diagnosis of GH deficiency in adults carried little significance other than as a marker of hypothalamo-pituitary disease. The relatively recent recognition of a characteristic clinical syndrome associated with failure of spontaneous GH secretion and the potential reversal of many of its features with recombinant human GH has prompted a closer examination of the physiological role of GH after linear growth is complete. The safe clinical practice of GH replacement demands a method of judging overall GH status, but there is no biological marker in adults that is the equivalent of linear growth in a child by which to judge the efficacy of GH replacement. Assessment of optimal GH replacement is made difficult by the apparent diverse actions of GH in health, concern about the avoidance of iatrogenic acromegaly, and the growing realization that an individual's risk of developing certain cancers may, at least in part, be influenced by cumulative exposure to the chief mediator of GH action, IGF-I. As in all areas of clinical practice, strategies and protocols vary between centers, but most physicians experienced in the management of pituitary disease agree that GH is most appropriately begun at low doses, building up slowly to the final maintenance dose. This, in turn, is best determined by a combination of clinical response and measurement of serum IGF-I, avoiding supraphysiological levels of this GH-dependent peptide. Numerous studies have helped define the optimum management of GH replacement during childhood. The recent requirement to measure and monitor GH status in adult life has called into question the appropriateness of simplistic weight- and surface area-based dosing regimens for the management of GH deficiency in childhood, with reliance on linear growth as the sole marker of GH action. It is clear that the monitoring of parameters other than linear growth to help refine GH therapy should now be incorporated into childhood GH treatment protocols. Further research will be required to define the optimal management of the transition from pediatric to adult GH replacement; this transition will only be possible once the benefits of GH in mature adults are defined and accepted by pediatric and adult endocrinologists alike.