1
|
Hussain MR, Ali FS, Tangri A, Rashtak S, Joseph-Talreja M, Mutha PR, Wadhwa V, Guha S, DaVee RT, Thosani N. The incremental yield of adenoma detection with I-Scan versus high-definition white light colonoscopy-a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023; 38:240. [PMID: 37755588 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04533-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The incremental yield of I-Scan virtual chromoendoscopy compared to high-definition white light endoscopy (HD-WLE) in detection of colorectal adenomas has not been thoroughly elucidated. METHODS A systematic search from inception to April 2023 was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing I-Scan to HD-WLE for detection of adenomas. A random effects model was used to compute risk difference (RD) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals in adenoma detection rate (ADR). Influence analysis was done to assess robustness of findings. The number needed to diagnose was computed. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic and explored further by subgroup analyses defined a priori. Certainty in effect estimates was assessed using the GRADE approach. RESULTS We identified four studies (I-Scan n = 730, HD-WLE n = 765). I-Scan increased adenoma detection by 9% (risk difference (RD), 0.09; 0.04, 0.14; I2 02%; certainty, low). Influence analysis revealed that the gain in yield remained statistically significant with exclusion of all but one study. The number needed to capture one additional adenomatous polyp with I-Scan use was 11.2. I-Scan 1 use was associated with a statistically significant gain in ADR, whereas no significant difference in ADR was noted with I-Scan use on subgroup analysis. DISCUSSION In conclusion, I-Scan increases the yield of adenoma detection by 9% compared to HD-WLE, with low certainty in the estimate of this effect. Data on the gain in yield of detecting large polyps, sessile serrated lesions, and on the impact of formally training endoscopists and trainees in I-Scan use and similar technology on adenoma detection rate are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam R Hussain
- Department of Population Health and Health Disparities/School of Public and Population Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Faisal S Ali
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Apoorva Tangri
- Department of Internal Medicine, Woodhull Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shahrooz Rashtak
- Center for Interventional Gastroenterology at UTHealth (iGUT), Department of Surgery, Division of Endoluminal Surgery and Interventional Gastroenterology, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mairin Joseph-Talreja
- Center for Interventional Gastroenterology at UTHealth (iGUT), Department of Surgery, Division of Endoluminal Surgery and Interventional Gastroenterology, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Pritesh R Mutha
- Center for Interventional Gastroenterology at UTHealth (iGUT), Department of Surgery, Division of Endoluminal Surgery and Interventional Gastroenterology, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vaibhav Wadhwa
- Center for Interventional Gastroenterology at UTHealth (iGUT), Department of Surgery, Division of Endoluminal Surgery and Interventional Gastroenterology, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sushovan Guha
- Center for Interventional Gastroenterology at UTHealth (iGUT), Department of Surgery, Division of Endoluminal Surgery and Interventional Gastroenterology, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Roy Tomas DaVee
- Center for Interventional Gastroenterology at UTHealth (iGUT), Department of Surgery, Division of Endoluminal Surgery and Interventional Gastroenterology, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nirav Thosani
- Center for Interventional Gastroenterology at UTHealth (iGUT), Department of Surgery, Division of Endoluminal Surgery and Interventional Gastroenterology, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hassan C, Piovani D, Spadaccini M, Parigi T, Khalaf K, Facciorusso A, Fugazza A, Rösch T, Bretthauer M, Mori Y, Sharma P, Rex DK, Bonovas S, Repici A. Variability in adenoma detection rate in control groups of randomized colonoscopy trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97:212-225.e7. [PMID: 36243103 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is still the main surrogate outcome parameter of screening colonoscopy, but most studies include mixed indications, and basic ADR is quite variable. We therefore looked at the control groups in randomized ADR trials using advanced imaging or mechanical methods to find out whether indications or other factors influence ADR levels. METHODS Patients in the control groups of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on ADR increase using various methods were collected based on a systematic review; this control group had to use high-definition white-light endoscopy performed between 2008 and 2021. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool ADR in control groups and its 95% confidence interval (CI) according to clinical (indication and demographic), study setting (tandem/parallel, number of centers, sample size), and technical (type of intervention, withdrawal time) parameters. Interstudy heterogeneity was reported with the I2 statistic. Multivariable mixed-effects meta-regression was performed for potentially relevant variables. RESULTS From 80 studies, 25,304 patients in the respective control groups were included. ADR in control arms varied between 8.2% and 68.1% with a high degree of heterogeneity (I2 = 95.1%; random-effect pooled value, 37.5%; 95% CI, 34.6‒40.5). There was no difference in ADR levels between primary colonoscopy screening (12 RCTs, 15%) and mixed indications including screening/surveillance and diagnostic colonoscopy; however, fecal immunochemical testing as an indication for colonoscopy was an independent predictor of ADR (odds ratio [OR], 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.4). Other well-known parameters were confirmed by our analysis such as age (OR, 1.038; 95% CI, 1.004-1.074), sex (male sex: OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03), and withdrawal time (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.1). The type of intervention (imaging vs mechanical) had no influence, but methodologic factors did: More recent year of publication and smaller sample size were associated with higher ADR. CONCLUSIONS A high level of variability was found in the level of ADR in the control groups of RCTs. With regards to indications, only fecal immunochemical test-based colonoscopy studies influenced basic ADR, and primary colonoscopy screening appeared to be similar to other indications. Standardization for variables related to clinical, methodologic, and technical parameters is required to achieve generalizability and reproducibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cesare Hassan
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy; Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Daniele Piovani
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy; Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Marco Spadaccini
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy; Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Tommaso Parigi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy; Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Kareem Khalaf
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Department of Medical Sciences, Section of Gastroenterology, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Alessandro Fugazza
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Thomas Rösch
- Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Michael Bretthauer
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Yuichi Mori
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Prateek Sharma
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | - Douglas K Rex
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Stefanos Bonovas
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy; Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy; Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Young EJ, Rajandran A, Philpott HL, Sathananthan D, Hoile SF, Singh R. Mucosal imaging in colon polyps: New advances and what the future may hold. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28:6632-6661. [PMID: 36620337 PMCID: PMC9813932 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i47.6632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2022] [Revised: 10/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
An expanding range of advanced mucosal imaging technologies have been developed with the goal of improving the detection and characterization of lesions in the gastrointestinal tract. Many technologies have targeted colorectal neoplasia given the potential for intervention prior to the development of invasive cancer in the setting of widespread surveillance programs. Improvement in adenoma detection reduces miss rates and prevents interval cancer development. Advanced imaging technologies aim to enhance detection without significantly increasing procedural time. Accurate polyp characterisation guides resection techniques for larger polyps, as well as providing the platform for the “resect and discard” and “do not resect” strategies for small and diminutive polyps. This review aims to collate and summarise the evidence regarding these technologies to guide colonoscopic practice in both interventional and non-interventional endoscopists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward John Young
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, Elizabeth Vale 5031, South Australia, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5000, South Australia, Australia
| | - Arvinf Rajandran
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, Elizabeth Vale 5031, South Australia, Australia
| | - Hamish Lachlan Philpott
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, Elizabeth Vale 5031, South Australia, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5000, South Australia, Australia
| | - Dharshan Sathananthan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, Elizabeth Vale 5031, South Australia, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5000, South Australia, Australia
| | - Sophie Fenella Hoile
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, Elizabeth Vale 5031, South Australia, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5000, South Australia, Australia
| | - Rajvinder Singh
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, Elizabeth Vale 5031, South Australia, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5000, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Aziz M, Ahmed Z, Haghbin H, Pervez A, Goyal H, Kamal F, Kobeissy A, Nawras A, Adler DG. Does i-scan improve adenoma detection rate compared to high-definition colonoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10:E824-E831. [PMID: 35692917 PMCID: PMC9187364 DOI: 10.1055/a-1794-0346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Recent studies evaluated the impact of i-scan in improving the adenoma detection rate (ADR) compared to high-definition (HD) colonoscopy. We aimed to systematically review and analyze the impact of this technique. Methods A thorough search of the following databases was undertaken: PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane and Web of Science. Full-text RCTs and cohort studies directly comparing i-scan and HD colonoscopy were deemed eligible for inclusion. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled and compared using random effects model and DerSimonian-Laird approach. For each outcome, relative risk (RR), 95 % confidence interval (CI), and P value was generated. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of five studies with six arms were included in this analysis. A total of 2620 patients (mean age 58.6 ± 7.2 years and female proportion 44.8 %) completed the study and were included in our analysis. ADR was significantly higher with any i-scan (RR: 1.20, [CI: 1.06-1.34], P = 0.003) compared to HD colonoscopy. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that ADR was significantly higher using i-scan with surface and contrast enhancement only (RR: 1.25, [CI: 1.07-1.47], P = 0.004). Conclusions i-scan has the potential to increase ADR using the surface and contrast enhancement method. Future studies evaluating other outcomes of interest such as proximal adenomas and serrated lesions are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Aziz
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, United States
| | - Zohaib Ahmed
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, United States
| | - Hossein Haghbin
- Division of Gastroenterology, Ascension Providence Hospital, Southfield, Michigan, United States
| | - Asad Pervez
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States
| | - Hemant Goyal
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Wright Center for Graduate Medical Education, Scranton, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Faisal Kamal
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
| | - Abdallah Kobeissy
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, United States
| | - Ali Nawras
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, United States
| | - Douglas G. Adler
- Center for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy (CATE), Centura Health, Porter Adventist Hospital, Peak Gastroenterology, Denver, Colorado, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) continues to be the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the US. Colonoscopy remains the best preventative tool against the development of CRC. As a result, high-quality colonoscopy is becoming increasingly important. Specifically, recent guidelines have highlighted pre-procedural, peri-procedural, and post-procedural practices, which promise to improve patient outcomes and reduce the mortality and interval cancer rates in patients undergoing colonoscopies. Despite the guidelines and advances in modern endoscopy, the procedure remains provider-dependent, which results in differences in outcomes. As a result, incorporating high-quality colonoscopy approaches early in training is key to improving patient outcomes. Additionally, ensuring that high-quality colonoscopy is practiced widely by endoscopists can lead to the most cost-effective care.
Collapse
|
6
|
Sehgal A, Aggarwal S, Mandaliya R, Loughney T, Mattar MC. Improving sessile serrated adenoma detection rates with high definition colonoscopy: A retrospective study. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 14:226-234. [PMID: 35634484 PMCID: PMC9048492 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i4.226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Revised: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sessile serrated adenomas (SSAs) are important premalignant lesions that are difficult to detect during colonoscopy due to poor definition, concealment by mucous caps, and flat appearance. High definition (HD) colonoscopy may uniquely aid in the detection of these inconspicuous lesions compared to standard definition (SD) colonoscopes. In the absence of existing clinical guidelines to obligate the use of HD colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening in average-risk patients, demonstrating the benefit of HD colonoscopy on SSA detection rate (SSADR) may help strengthen the evidence to recommend its use in all settings.
AIM To evaluate the benefit of HD colonoscopy compared to SD colonoscopy on SSADR in average-risk patients undergoing screening colonoscopy.
METHODS Data from screening colonoscopies for patients aged 50-76 years two years before and two years after the transition from SD colonoscopy to HD colonoscopy at our large, academic teaching center were collected. Patients with symptoms of colorectal disease, positive occult blood test, history of colon polyps, cancer, polyposis syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease or family history of colon cancer or polyps were excluded. Patients whose endoscopists did not perform colonoscopies both before and after scope definition change were also excluded. Differences in individual endoscopist SSADR, average SSADR, and overall SSADR with SD colonoscopy vs HD colonoscopy were also evaluated for significance.
RESULTS A total of 3657 colonoscopies met eligibility criteria with 2012 colonoscopies from the SD colonoscopy period and 1645 colonoscopies from the HD colonoscopy period from a pool of 11 endoscopists. Statistically significant improvements of 2.30% in mean SSADR and 2.53% in overall SSADR were noted with HD colonoscopy (P = 0.00028 and P = 0.00849, respectively). On the individual level, three endoscopists experienced statistically significant benefit with HD colonoscopy (+5.74%, P = 0.0056; +4.50%, P = 0.0278; +4.84%, P = 0.03486).
CONCLUSION Our study suggests that HD colonoscopy statistically significantly improves sessile serrated adenoma detection rate in the screening of average risk patients during screening colonoscopy. By improving the detection and removal of these lesions, adoption of HD colonoscopy may reduce the significant premalignant burden of sessile serrated adenomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhinav Sehgal
- Department of Gastroenterology, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20007, United States
| | - Soorya Aggarwal
- Division of Gastroenterology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC 20007, United States
| | - Rohan Mandaliya
- Division of Gastroenterology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC 20007, United States
| | - Thomas Loughney
- Division of Gastroenterology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC 20007, United States
| | - Mark C Mattar
- Division of Gastroenterology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC 20007, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sehgal A, Aggarwal S, Mandaliya R, Loughney T, Mattar MC. Improving sessile serrated adenoma detection rates with high definition colonoscopy: A retrospective study. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 14:226-234. [DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i3.226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sessile serrated adenomas (SSAs) are important premalignant lesions that are difficult to detect during colonoscopy due to poor definition, concealment by mucous caps, and flat appearance. High definition (HD) colonoscopy may uniquely aid in the detection of these inconspicuous lesions compared to standard definition (SD) colonoscopes. In the absence of existing clinical guidelines to obligate the use of HD colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening in average-risk patients, demonstrating the benefit of HD colonoscopy on SSA detection rate (SSADR) may help strengthen the evidence to recommend its use in all settings.
AIM To evaluate the benefit of HD colonoscopy compared to SD colonoscopy on SSADR in average-risk patients undergoing screening colonoscopy.
METHODS Data from screening colonoscopies for patients aged 50-76 years two years before and two years after the transition from SD colonoscopy to HD colonoscopy at our large, academic teaching center were collected. Patients with symptoms of colorectal disease, positive occult blood test, history of colon polyps, cancer, polyposis syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease or family history of colon cancer or polyps were excluded. Patients whose endoscopists did not perform colonoscopies both before and after scope definition change were also excluded. Differences in individual endoscopist SSADR, average SSADR, and overall SSADR with SD colonoscopy vs HD colonoscopy were also evaluated for significance.
RESULTS A total of 3657 colonoscopies met eligibility criteria with 2012 colonoscopies from the SD colonoscopy period and 1645 colonoscopies from the HD colonoscopy period from a pool of 11 endoscopists. Statistically significant improvements of 2.30% in mean SSADR and 2.53% in overall SSADR were noted with HD colonoscopy (P = 0.00028 and P = 0.00849, respectively). On the individual level, three endoscopists experienced statistically significant benefit with HD colonoscopy (+5.74%, P = 0.0056; +4.50%, P = 0.0278; +4.84%, P = 0.03486).
CONCLUSION Our study suggests that HD colonoscopy statistically significantly improves sessile serrated adenoma detection rate in the screening of average risk patients during screening colonoscopy. By improving the detection and removal of these lesions, adoption of HD colonoscopy may reduce the significant premalignant burden of sessile serrated adenomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhinav Sehgal
- Department of Gastroenterology, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20007, United States
| | - Soorya Aggarwal
- Division of Gastroenterology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC 20007, United States
| | - Rohan Mandaliya
- Division of Gastroenterology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC 20007, United States
| | - Thomas Loughney
- Division of Gastroenterology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC 20007, United States
| | - Mark C Mattar
- Division of Gastroenterology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC 20007, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Factors Associated with Polyp Detection Rate in European Colonoscopy Practice: Findings of The European Colonoscopy Quality Investigation (ECQI) Group. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19063388. [PMID: 35329077 PMCID: PMC8954761 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19063388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Revised: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Background: The European Colonoscopy Quality Investigation (ECQI) Group aims to raise awareness for improvement in colonoscopy standards across Europe. We analysed data collected on a sample of procedures conducted across Europe to evaluate the achievement of the polyp detection rate (PDR) target. We also investigated factors associated with PDR, in the hope of establishing areas that could lead to a quality improvement. Methods: 6445 form completions from 12 countries between 2 June 2016 and 30 April 2018 were considered for this analysis. We performed an exploratory analysis looking at PDR according to European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) definition. Stepwise multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the most influential associated factors after adjusting for the other pre-specified variables. Results: In our sample there were 3365 screening and diagnostic procedures performed in those over 50 years. The PDR was 40.5%, which is comparable with the ESGE minimum standard of 40%. The variables found to be associated with PDR were in descending order: use of high-definition equipment, body mass index (BMI), patient gender, age group, and the reason for the procedure. Use of HD equipment was associated with a significant increase in the reporting of flat lesions (14.3% vs. 5.7%, p < 0.0001) and protruded lesions (34.7% vs. 25.4%, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: On average, the sample of European practice captured by the ECQI survey meets the minimum PDR standard set by the ESGE. Our findings support the ESGE recommendation for routine use of HD colonoscopy.
Collapse
|
9
|
Hann A, Meining A. Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy. Visc Med 2022; 37:471-475. [PMID: 35083312 DOI: 10.1159/000519407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Owing to their rapid development, artificial intelligence (AI) technologies offer a great promise for gastroenterology practice and research. At present, AI-guided image interpretation has already been used with success for endoscopic detection of early malignant lesions. Nonetheless, there are complex challenges and possible shortcomings that must be considered before full implementation can be realized. Summary In this review, the current status of AI in endoscopy is summarized. Future perspectives and open questions for further studies are stressed. Key Messages The usage of AI algorithms for polyp detection in screening colonoscopy results in a significant increase in the adenoma detection rate, mainly attributed to the identification of diminutive polyps. Computer-aided characterization of colorectal polyps accompanies the detection, but further studies are needed to evaluate the clinical benefit. In contrast to colonoscopy, usage of AI in gastroscopy is currently rather limited. Regarding other fields of endoscopic imaging, capsule endoscopy is the ideal imaging platform for AI, due to the potential of saving time in the video analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Hann
- Interventional and Experimental Endoscopy (InExEn), Department of Internal Medicine II, Gastroenterology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Meining
- Interventional and Experimental Endoscopy (InExEn), Department of Internal Medicine II, Gastroenterology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
van Toledo DEFWM, IJspeert JEG, Dekker E. Current Approaches in Managing Colonic Serrated Polyps and Serrated Polyposis. Annu Rev Med 2022; 73:293-306. [PMID: 35084990 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-med-042220-024703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
For decades, conventional adenomas were the only known precursor lesions of colorectal cancer (CRC). Accordingly, education and research regarding CRC prevention were mainly focused on adenomas. The groundbreaking discovery that serrated polyps (SPs) also have the potential to develop into CRCs, and seem to account for a considerable proportion of sporadic CRCs, has led to a paradigm shift in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of CRC. Studies in recent years have led to our current understanding of SPs and associated CRC, but a lot of work is still to be done to further improve knowledge about this serrated neoplasia pathway and the clinical management of SPs and serrated polyposis syndrome (SPS). In this review, we reflect on the current understanding of SPs with respect to terminology, detection, resection, and surveillance and reflect on the management of SPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David E F W M van Toledo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Center, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; , ,
| | - Joep E G IJspeert
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Center, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; , ,
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Center, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; , ,
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lee A, Tutticci N. Enhancing polyp detection: technological advances in colonoscopy imaging. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 6:61. [PMID: 34805583 DOI: 10.21037/tgh.2020.02.05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2019] [Accepted: 01/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The detection and removal of polyps at colonoscopy is core to the current colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention strategy. However, colonoscopy is flawed with a well described miss rate and variability in detection rates associated with incomplete protection from CRC. Consequently, there is significant interest in techniques and technologies which increase polyp detection with the aim to remedy colonoscopy's ills. Technologic advances in colonoscope imaging are numerous and include; increased definition of imaging, widening field of view, virtual technologies to supplant conventional chromocolonoscopy (CC) and now computer assisted detection. However, despite nearly two decades of technologic advances, data on gains in detection from individual technologies have been modest at best and heterogenous and conflicted as a rule. This state of detection technology science is exacerbated by use of relatively blunt metrics of improvement without consensus, the myopic search for gains over single generations of technology improvement and an unhealthy focus on adenomatous lesions. Yet there remains cause for optimism as detection gains from new technology, while small, may still improve CRC prevention. The technologies are also readily available in current generation colonoscopes and have roles beyond simply detection such as lesion characterization, further improving their worth. Coupled with the imminent expansion of computer assisted detection the detection future from colonoscope imaging advances looks bright. This review aims to cover the major imaging advances and evidence for improvement in polyp detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Lee
- Endoscopy Unit, Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Nicholas Tutticci
- Endoscopy Unit, Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Spadaccini M, Iannone A, Maselli R, Badalamenti M, Desai M, Chandrasekar VT, Patel HK, Fugazza A, Pellegatta G, Galtieri PA, Lollo G, Carrara S, Anderloni A, Rex DK, Savevski V, Wallace MB, Bhandari P, Roesch T, Gralnek IM, Sharma P, Hassan C, Repici A. Computer-aided detection versus advanced imaging for detection of colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 6:793-802. [PMID: 34363763 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(21)00215-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2021] [Revised: 05/31/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Computer-aided detection (CADe) techniques based on artificial intelligence algorithms can assist endoscopists in detecting colorectal neoplasia. CADe has been associated with an increased adenoma detection rate, a key quality indicator, but the utility of CADe compared with existing advanced imaging techniques and distal attachment devices is unclear. METHODS For this systematic review and network meta-analysis, we did a comprehensive search of PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Scopus databases from inception to Nov 30, 2020, for randomised controlled trials investigating the effectiveness of the following endoscopic techniques in detecting colorectal neoplasia: CADe, high definition (HD) white-light endoscopy, chromoendoscopy, or add-on devices (ie, systems that increase mucosal visualisation, such as full spectrum endoscopy [FUSE] or G-EYE balloon endoscopy). We collected data on adenoma detection rates, sessile serrated lesion detection rates, the proportion of large adenomas detected per colonoscopy, and withdrawal times. A frequentist framework, random-effects network meta-analysis was done to compare artificial intelligence with chromoendoscopy, increased mucosal visualisation systems, and HD white-light endoscopy (the control group). We estimated odds ratios (ORs) for the adenoma detection rate, sessile serrated lesion detection rate, and proportion of large adenomas detected per colonoscopy, and calculated mean differences for withdrawal time, with 95% CIs. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. FINDINGS 50 randomised controlled trials, comprising 34 445 participants, were included in our main analysis (six trials of CADe, 18 of chromoendoscopy, and 26 of increased mucosal visualisation systems). HD white-light endoscopy was the control technique in all 50 studies. Compared with the control technique, the adenoma detection rate was 7·4% higher with CADe (OR 1·78 [95% CI 1·44-2·18]), 4·4% higher with chromoendoscopy (1·22 [1·08-1·39]), and 4·1% higher with increased mucosal visualisation systems (1·16 [1·04-1·28]). CADe ranked as the superior technique for adenoma detection (with moderate confidence in hierarchical ranking); cross-comparisons of CADe with other imaging techniques showed a significant increase in the adenoma detection rate with CADe versus increased mucosal visualisation systems (OR 1·54 [95% CI 1·22-1·94]; low certainty of evidence) and with CADe versus chromoendoscopy (1·45 [1·14-1·85]; moderate certainty of evidence). When focusing on large adenomas (≥10 mm) there was a significant increase in the detection of large adenomas only with CADe (OR 1·69 [95% CI 1·10-2·60], moderate certainty of evidence) when compared to HD white-light endoscopy; CADe ranked as the superior strategy for detection of large adenomas. CADe also seemed to be the superior strategy for detection of sessile serrated lesions (with moderate confidence in hierarchical ranking), although no significant increase in the sessile serrated lesion detection rate was shown (OR 1·37 [95% CI 0·65-2·88]). No significant difference in withdrawal time was reported for CADe compared with the other techniques. INTERPRETATION Based on the published literature, detection rates of colorectal neoplasia are higher with CADe than with other techniques such as chromoendoscopy or tools that increase mucosal visualisation, supporting wider incorporation of CADe strategies into community endoscopy services. FUNDING None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Spadaccini
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
| | - Andrea Iannone
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Section of Gastroenterology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Roberta Maselli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Badalamenti
- Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Madhav Desai
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | | | - Harsh K Patel
- Endoscopy Unit, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Alessandro Fugazza
- Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Gaia Pellegatta
- Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Gianluca Lollo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Silvia Carrara
- Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Douglas K Rex
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Victor Savevski
- Artificial Intelligence Research, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Michael B Wallace
- Endoscopy Unit, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Pradeep Bhandari
- Department of Gastroenterology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Thomas Roesch
- Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ian M Gralnek
- Institute of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Ha'Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
| | - Prateek Sharma
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Latest Generation High-Definition Colonoscopy Increases Adenoma Detection Rate by Trainee Endoscopists. Dig Dis Sci 2021; 66:2756-2762. [PMID: 32808142 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-020-06543-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is an important quality indicator of colonoscopy. High-definition (HD) colonoscopy has been reported to increase ADR compared to standard-definition (SD) colonoscopy. Although there are few reports comparing the latest generation and the previous generation of HD colonoscopy equipment, there are reports that the latest generation colonoscopy equipment improves ADR. However, there are no reports on the impact of the latest generation HD colonoscopy on the ADR of trainee endoscopists. AIMS The aim of this study was to investigate whether the latest generation HD colonoscopy increases the ADR of trainee endoscopists compared with the previous generation HD colonoscopy. METHOD We conducted a retrospective review of medical records of patients aged 40-79 years old, who underwent screening or surveillance colonoscopy performed by nine gastroenterology fellows at Dong-A University Hospital from March 2019 to February 2020. We calculated the overall ratios of the ADR: the ADRs of the group using the older generation HD colonoscopy equipment and the group using the latest HD colonoscopy equipment. Polyp detection rate (PDR), sessile serrated polyp detection rate (SSPDR), and advanced neoplasia detection rate (ANDR) were calculated for each group. Factors related to adenoma detection were identified using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS Altogether, 2189 patients were included in the study (the older HD colonoscopy group comprising 1183 and the latest HD colonoscopy group comprising 1006). We found that PDR (45.98 vs. 51.69%, p = 0.008) and ADR (35.67 vs. 40.85%, p = 0.013) were significantly higher in the latest generation HD colonoscopy group. The generational differences were not statistically significant for SSPDR (1.94 vs. 2.78%, p = 0.195) or ANDR (4.65 vs. 4.97%, p = 0.726). In the multivariate regression analysis, age, male sex, the latest generation HD colonoscopy, and long withdrawal time were the most significant factors affecting adenoma detection. CONCLUSIONS The latest generation HD colonoscopy improved PDR and ADR by trainee endoscopists. These findings suggest that latest generation, higher-resolution colonoscopy equipment can improve the quality of colonoscopy for less experienced endoscopists.
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colonoscopy is an imperfect gold standard for detecting colorectal neoplasms because some proportion of adenomas may be missed, mainly small lesions. This proportion is expected to be higher in case of inadequate bowel cleansing, which is frequently seen in routine practice. We estimated the proportions of neoplasms that are in principle detectable by colonoscopy but might be missed in case of incomplete bowel preparation. METHODS For 8,193 participants of screening colonoscopy in South-Western Germany, recruited between 2005 and 2016, the prevalence and numbers of different findings were extracted from colonoscopy reports and compared according to the reported bowel preparation quality. RESULTS Bowel preparation quality was reported as good, poor, or was unspecified in 30.3%, 11.1%, and 58.6% of colonoscopy records. Reported prevalences of nonadvanced adenomas (NAAs) were similar among participants with poor and unspecified bowel preparation quality but substantially lower than among participants with good bowel preparation (adjusted prevalence rate ratio [RR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77-0.96). The differences were observed for proximal but not for distal NAAs (RRs 0.82, 95% CI: 0.71-0.95 and 0.95, 95% CI: 0.82-1.10). DISCUSSION Our study suggests that a significant proportion of NAAs located in the proximal colon might be missed during colonoscopy if bowel cleansing is not adequate. Major efforts should be made to further facilitate and enhance high-quality bowel preparation in routine screening practice.
Collapse
|
15
|
Hollenbach M, Feisthammel J, Hoffmeister A. [Endoscopic diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of polyps of the lower gastrointestinal tract]. Internist (Berl) 2020; 62:151-162. [PMID: 33237438 DOI: 10.1007/s00108-020-00902-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The endoscopic management of polyps of the lower gastrointestinal tract (l-GIT) has emerged in recent years as a result of numerous technological innovations. However, proven expertise and experience are essential. OBJECTIVES Presentation of novel and standard techniques and best-practice recommendations for the characterization and resection of l‑GIT polyps. METHODS Recent specialist literature and current guidelines. RESULTS High-definition endoscopy should be the standard when performing colonoscopy. The (virtual) chromoendoscopy can improve detection and characterization of polyps, but always requires special expertise and experience of the endoscopist in advanced endoscopic imaging. In this regard, computer-aided-diagnosis (CAD) systems have the potential to support endoscopists in the future. Pedunculated polyps should be removed with a hot snare. Small flat polyps can be resected by cold snare or large forceps. Large, non-pedunculated polyps should be treated in an interdisciplinary approach at a referral center with long-standing experience depending on its malignancy potential. After complete resection of small adenoma without high grade dysplasia, surveillance endoscopy is recommended after 5-10 years. Patients with large adenoma or high grade dysplasia should undergo endoscopy after 3 years and patients with multiple adenoma earlier than 3 years. After incomplete or piecemeal resection or insufficient bowel preparation, near-term endoscopy is recommended. CONCLUSIONS Adequate characterization and treatment are essential for the appropriate management of l‑GIT polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Hollenbach
- Bereich Gastroenterologie der Klinik für Onkologie, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Pneumologie und Infektiologie, Department für Innere Medizin, Neurologie und Dermatologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
| | - J Feisthammel
- Bereich Gastroenterologie der Klinik für Onkologie, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Pneumologie und Infektiologie, Department für Innere Medizin, Neurologie und Dermatologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - A Hoffmeister
- Bereich Gastroenterologie der Klinik für Onkologie, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Pneumologie und Infektiologie, Department für Innere Medizin, Neurologie und Dermatologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gupta V, East JE. Optimal Endoscopic Treatment and Surveillance of Serrated Polyps. Gut Liver 2020; 14:423-429. [PMID: 31581390 PMCID: PMC7366140 DOI: 10.5009/gnl19202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2019] [Revised: 07/26/2019] [Accepted: 08/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Serrated polyps are considered precursor lesions that account for 15% to 30% of colorectal cancers, and they are overrepresented as a cause of interval cancers. They are difficult to detect and resect comprehensively; however, recent data suggest that high definition endoscopy, chromoendoscopy (via spray catheter, pump or orally), narrow band imaging, split-dose bowel preparation and a slower withdrawal (>6 minutes) can all improve detection. Cold snare resection is effective and safe for these lesions, including cold snare piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection, which is likely to become the standard of care for lesions >10 mm in size. Sessile serrated lesions ≥10 mm in size, those exhbiting dysplasia, or traditional serrated adenomas increase the chance of future advanced neoplasia. Thus, a consensus is emerging: a surveillance examination at 3 years should be recommended if these lesions are detected. Serrated lesions likely carry equivalent risk to adenomas, so future guidelines may consider serrated class lesions and adenomas together for risk stratification. Patients with serrated polyposis syndrome should undergo surveillance every 1 to 2 years once the colon is cleared of larger lesions, and their first degree relatives should undergo screening every 5 years starting at age 40.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vipin Gupta
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit and Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Experimental Medicine Division, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - James E East
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit and Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Experimental Medicine Division, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tziatzios G, Gkolfakis P, Lazaridis LD, Facciorusso A, Antonelli G, Hassan C, Repici A, Sharma P, Rex DK, Triantafyllou K. High-definition colonoscopy for improving adenoma detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91:1027-1036.e9. [PMID: 31954133 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.12.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2019] [Accepted: 12/30/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Previous meta-analysis showed marginal benefit of high-definition white-light endoscopy (HD-WLE) over standard-definition colonoscopy (SDC) for adenoma detection, but with residual uncertainty due to inclusion of nonrandomized studies. We aimed to further assess the effect of HD-WLE on adenoma detection by including only randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS A literature search was performed for RCTs evaluating HD-WLE versus SDC in terms of adenoma, advanced adenoma, and serrated sessile adenoma detection rates as well as the mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy (MAC), the mean number of advanced adenomas per colonoscopy (MAAC), and the mean number of sessile serrated adenomas per colonoscopy (MSSAC). The effect size on study outcomes is presented as the risk ratio (RR; 95% confidence interval [CI]) or mean difference (MD; 95% CI). We assessed the strength of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. RESULTS Six RCTs involving 4594 individuals (HD-WLE, 2323; SDC, 2271) were included. Clinical indications were screening (1 study), positive result for fecal occult blood test, personal/family history of colorectal cancer (1 study), and mixed indications (4 studies). Withdrawal time was similar between the 2 arms (MD, -0.06; 95% CI, -0.25 to 0.12; P = .50). The adenoma detection rate was significantly higher in the HD-WLE arm compared with the SDC arm (40% vs 35%; RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.05-1.22; P = .001; I2 = 0%; GRADE, low). This effect was consistent for advanced and sessile serrated adenoma detection rates (RR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.03-1.72; P = .03; I2 = 0%; GRADE, low; and RR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.05-2.28; P = .03; I2 = 0%; GRADE, low, respectively). In contrast, the difference was not significant for MAC, MAAC, and MSSAC. CONCLUSIONS Meta-analyses of RCT data support the use of HD-WLE in clinical practice, although the additional benefit is limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Tziatzios
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine - Propaedeutic, Research Institute and Diabetes Center, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine - Propaedeutic, Research Institute and Diabetes Center, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Lazaros Dimitrios Lazaridis
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine - Propaedeutic, Research Institute and Diabetes Center, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia AOU, Ospedali Riunity Viale Pinto, Foggia, Italy
| | - Giulio Antonelli
- Endoscopy Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Endoscopy Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center and Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Prateek Sharma
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas, Missouri; Department of Gastroenterology, Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Kansas, Missouri
| | - Douglas K Rex
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University Hospital, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine - Propaedeutic, Research Institute and Diabetes Center, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gong D, Wu L, Zhang J, Mu G, Shen L, Liu J, Wang Z, Zhou W, An P, Huang X, Jiang X, Li Y, Wan X, Hu S, Chen Y, Hu X, Xu Y, Zhu X, Li S, Yao L, He X, Chen D, Huang L, Wei X, Wang X, Yu H. Detection of colorectal adenomas with a real-time computer-aided system (ENDOANGEL): a randomised controlled study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 5:352-361. [PMID: 31981518 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30413-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 217] [Impact Index Per Article: 54.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2019] [Revised: 11/11/2019] [Accepted: 11/14/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colonoscopy performance varies among endoscopists, impairing the discovery of colorectal cancers and precursor lesions. We aimed to construct a real-time quality improvement system (ENDOANGEL) to monitor real-time withdrawal speed and colonoscopy withdrawal time and to remind endoscopists of blind spots caused by endoscope slipping. We also aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of this system for improving adenoma yield of everyday colonoscopy. METHODS The ENDOANGEL system was developed using deep neural networks and perceptual hash algorithms. We recruited consecutive patients aged 18-75 years from Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University in China who provided written informed consent. We randomly assigned patients (1:1) using computer-generated random numbers and block randomisation (block size of four) to either colonoscopy with the ENDOANGEL system or unassisted colonoscopy (control). Endoscopists were not masked to the random assignment but analysts and patients were unaware of random assignments. The primary endpoint was the adenoma detection rate (ADR), which is the proportion of patients having one or more adenomas detected at colonoscopy. The primary analysis was done per protocol (ie, in all patients having colonoscopy done in accordance with the assigned intervention) and by intention to treat (ie, in all randomised patients). This trial is registered with http://www.chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR1900021984. FINDINGS Between June 18, 2019, and Sept 6, 2019, 704 patients were randomly allocated colonoscopy with the ENDOANGEL system (n=355) or unassisted (control) colonoscopy (n=349). In the intention-to-treat population, ADR was significantly greater in the ENDOANGEL group than in the control group, with 58 (16%) of 355 patients allocated ENDOANGEL-assisted colonoscopy having one or more adenomas detected, compared with 27 (8%) of 349 allocated control colonoscopy (odds ratio [OR] 2·30, 95% CI 1·40-3·77; p=0·0010). In the per-protocol analysis, findings were similar, with 54 (17%) of 324 patients assigned ENDOANGEL-assisted colonoscopy and 26 (8%) of 318 patients assigned control colonoscopy having one or more adenomas detected (OR 2·18, 95% CI 1·31-3·62; p=0·0026). No adverse events were reported. INTERPRETATION The ENDOANGEL system significantly improved the adenoma yield during colonoscopy and seems to be effective and safe for use during routine colonoscopy. FUNDING Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision, Hubei Province Major Science and Technology Innovation Project, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dexin Gong
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Lianlian Wu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Ganggang Mu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Lei Shen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Jun Liu
- Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhengqiang Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Wei Zhou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Ping An
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Xu Huang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiaoda Jiang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Yanxia Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Xinyue Wan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Shan Hu
- School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Yiyun Chen
- School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiao Hu
- School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Youming Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiaoyun Zhu
- Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Suqin Li
- Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Liwen Yao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Xinqi He
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Di Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Li Huang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiao Wei
- Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Xuemei Wang
- Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Honggang Yu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lahiff C, East JE. Distal attachments for adenoma detection go head-to-head: Cap or cuff? J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 34:1471-1473. [PMID: 31591791 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.14850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Conor Lahiff
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.,School of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - James E East
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|