Diagnostic Accuracy of V/Q and Q SPECT/CT in Patients with Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

[Diagnostics and treatment of pulmonary artery embolisms]

In recent years the diagnostics of pulmonary artery embolisms (PE) has gained significance, with confirmation occurring in only about 15-25 % of suspected cases. Despite technological advances, radiological methods remain problematic due to radiation and contrast medium exposure. Clinical scores play a crucial role in the risk assessment of PE. High-risk situations call for specific measures, while negative D‑dimers can help avoid overdiagnosis. Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) remains the gold standard with high sensitivity and specificity. Treatment requires an interdisciplinary team (pulmonary embolism response team, PERT). Anticoagulation is an option for stable patients, while in unstable or unsuccessful courses, thrombolysis or interventional procedures can be considered. Side effects, especially the risk of bleeding, need to be considered for both forms of treatment.

To PE or Not to PE: Perfusion SPECT/CT Avoids Overdiagnosis

ABSTRACT

A 41-year-old woman with metastatic breast cancer presented with dyspnea, hypoxia, and elevated d -dimer. Perfusion planar imaging followed by SPECT/CT of the chest was performed due to the patient's iodinated contrast allergy. Planar images showed multiple pleural-based wedge-shaped defects concerning for bilateral pulmonary embolism (PE). Perfusion SPECT/CT of the chest confirmed multiple areas of perfusion defects but was considered negative for PE and attributed the perfusion defects to the compressing of pulmonary vasculature from metastatic lymph nodes and pulmonary masses. Given the high pretest probability of PE, a CT pulmonary angiogram was performed after premedication for contrast allergy confirming absence of PE.

The Diagnostic Accuracy of SPECT Imaging in Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis and systematic review assessed the diagnostic accuracy of lung SPECT compared with lung planar imaging in patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism (PE) or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A search of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases identified suitable articles published before October 2023. Meta-analyses were performed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of SPECT imaging modalities, including perfusion (Q) SPECT, ventilation (V)/Q SPECT, Q SPECT/CT, and V/Q SPECT/CT. Network meta-analyses were performed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of SPECT and planar imaging in paired-design studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-four articles (total n = 6576) were included in the analysis. For suspected acute PE, the respective sensitivity and specificity of SPECT imaging modalities were as follows: Q SPECT, 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-0.99; I2 = 49%) and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.54-0.95; I2 = 94%); V/Q SPECT, 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94-0.98; I2 = 51%) and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.98; I2 = 80%); Q SPECT/CT, 0.93 (95% CI, 0.87-0.98; I2 = 66%) and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.70-0.96; I2 = 87%); and V/Q SPECT/CT, 0.97 (95% CI, 0.93-1.00; I2 = 7%) and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.97-1.00; I2 = 31%). The relative sensitivity and specificity of SPECT compared with planar imaging were 1.17 (95% CI, 1.06-1.30; P < 0.001) and 1.14 (95% CI, 1.00-1.29; P = 0.05), respectively. For suspected chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of SPECT imaging were 0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-1.00; I2 = 0%) and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.87-0.94; I2 = 0%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

SPECT exhibited superior diagnostic performance for PE. V/Q SPECT/CT was the most accurate modality.

Modern imaging of acute pulmonary embolism

The first-choice imaging test for visualization of thromboemboli in the pulmonary vasculature in patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is multidetector computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) - a readily available and widely used imaging technique. Through technological advancements over the past years, alternative imaging techniques for the diagnosis of PE have become available, whilst others are still under investigation. In particular, the evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) is expected to enable further innovation in diagnostic management of PE. In this narrative review, current CTPA techniques and the emerging technology photon-counting CT (PCCT), as well as other modern imaging techniques of acute PE are discussed, including CTPA with iodine maps based on subtraction or dual-energy acquisition, single-photon emission CT (SPECT), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), and magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging (MRDTI). Furthermore, potential applications of AI are discussed.

[Translation into French and republication of: "Recurrent venous thromboembolism in anticoagulated cancer patients: diagnosis and treatment"]

Patients with cancer are at significantly increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), due both to the impact of malignant disease itself and to the impact of certain anticancer drugs on haemostasis. This is true both for first episode venous thromboembolism and recurrence. The diagnosis and management of VTE recurrence in patients with cancer poses particular challenges, and these are reviewed in the present article, based on a systematic review of the relevant scientific literature published over the last decade. Furthermore, it is uncertain whether diagnostic algorithms for venous thromboembolism, validated principally in untreated non-cancer patients, are also valid in anticoagulated cancer patients: the available data suggests that clinical decision rules and D-dimer testing perform less well in this clinical setting. In patients with cancer, computed tomography pulmonary angiography and venous ultrasound appear to be the most reliable diagnostic tools for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis respectively. Options for treatment of venous thromboembolism include low molecular weight heparins (at a therapeutic dose or an increased dose), fondaparinux or oral direct factor Xa inhibitors. The choice of treatment should take into account the nature (pulmonary embolism or VTE) and severity of the recurrent event, the associated bleeding risk, the current anticoagulant treatment (type, dose, adherence and possible drug-drug interactions) and cancer progression.

Recurrent venous thromboembolism in anticoagulated cancer patients: Diagnosis and treatment

Patients with cancer are at significantly increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), due both to the impact of malignant disease itself and to the impact of certain anticancer drugs on haemostasis. This is true both for first episode venous thromboembolism and recurrence. The diagnosis and management of VTE recurrence in patients with cancer poses particular challenges, and these are reviewed in the present article, based on a systematic review of the relevant scientific literature published over the last decade. Furthermore, it is uncertain whether diagnostic algorithms for venous thromboembolism, validated principally in untreated non-cancer patients, are also valid in anticoagulated cancer patients: the available data suggests that clinical decision rules and D-dimer testing perform less well in this clinical setting. In patients with cancer, computed tomography pulmonary angiography and venous ultrasound appear to be the most reliable diagnostic tools for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis respectively. Options for treatment of venous thromboembolism include low molecular weight heparins (at a therapeutic dose or an increased dose), fondaparinux or oral direct factor Xa inhibitors. The choice of treatment should take into account the nature (pulmonary embolism or VTE) and severity of the recurrent event, the associated bleeding risk, the current anticoagulant treatment (type, dose, adherence and possible drug-drug interactions) and cancer progression.