Endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques and technology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Review

The Current Landscape of Endoscopic Submucosal Training in the United States

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been found to increase en bloc and R0 resection as well as decrease risk of recurrence. However, despite literature supporting the benefits of endoscopic submucosal dissection, adoption of ESD in the United States has been challenging, driven by factors including requirement for specialized training as well as limitations in training availability.

RECENT FINDINGS

Many devices have been developed to improve ease and therefore adoption for the procedure, with advancements in stability, resection as well as closure of the mucosal defect following resection. While the Japanese model of training in ESD centers around the Master-Apprentice model, this is scarce in the United States. Most US endoscopists therefore must follow other paths to learn and become proficient at ESD. There has been a rapid expansion in literature on ESD, fellowship programs, opportunities for case observation, and significant evolution in ex vivo training models that can assist an endoscopist in receiving training in ESD. Currently, there are three main ways of learning to perform ESD in the United States: 1. Third space endoscopy fellowship; 2. Master-apprentice model; 3. Utilization of live courses and proctored procedures. ESD is the optimal method to ensure en bloc resection of large mucosal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract. While several barriers hinder adoption of ESD in the United States, there has been significant development both in procedural and training aspects. Further research and discussions are needed to determine criteria for credentialing and proficiency in ESD.

Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), European Helicobacter and Microbiota Study Group (EHMSG) and European Society of Pathology (ESP) Guideline update 2025

At a population level, the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), the European Helicobacter and Microbiota Study Group (EHMSG), and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) suggest endoscopic screening for gastric cancer (and precancerous conditions) in high-risk regions (age-standardized rate [ASR] > 20 per 100 000 person-years) every 2 to 3 years or, if cost-effectiveness has been proven, in intermediate risk regions (ASR 10-20 per 100 000 person-years) every 5 years, but not in low-risk regions (ASR < 10).ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend that irrespective of country of origin, individual gastric risk assessment and stratification of precancerous conditions is recommended for first-time gastroscopy. ESGE/EHMSG/ESP suggest that gastric cancer screening or surveillance in asymptomatic individuals over 80 should be discontinued or not started, and that patients' comorbidities should be considered when treatment of superficial lesions is planned.ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend that a high quality endoscopy including the use of virtual chromoendoscopy (VCE), after proper training, is performed for screening, diagnosis, and staging of precancerous conditions (atrophy and intestinal metaplasia) and lesions (dysplasia or cancer), as well as after endoscopic therapy. VCE should be used to guide the sampling site for biopsies in the case of suspected neoplastic lesions as well as to guide biopsies for diagnosis and staging of gastric precancerous conditions, with random biopsies to be taken in the absence of endoscopically suspected changes. When there is a suspected early gastric neoplastic lesion, it should be properly described (location, size, Paris classification, vascular and mucosal pattern), photodocumented, and two targeted biopsies taken.ESGE/EHMSG/ESP do not recommend routine performance of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or positron emission tomography (PET)-CT prior to endoscopic resection unless there are signs of deep submucosal invasion or if the lesion is not considered suitable for endoscopic resection.ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for differentiated gastric lesions clinically staged as dysplastic (low grade and high grade) or as intramucosal carcinoma (of any size if not ulcerated or ≤ 30 mm if ulcerated), with EMR being an alternative for Paris 0-IIa lesions of size ≤ 10 mm with low likelihood of malignancy.ESGE/EHMSG/ESP suggest that a decision about ESD can be considered for malignant lesions clinically staged as having minimal submucosal invasion if differentiated and ≤ 30 mm; or for malignant lesions clinically staged as intramucosal, undifferentiated and ≤ 20 mm; and in both cases with no ulcerative findings.ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommends patient management based on the following histological risk after endoscopic resection: Curative/very low-risk resection (lymph node metastasis [LNM] risk < 0.5 %-1 %): en bloc R0 resection; dysplastic/pT1a, differentiated lesion, no lymphovascular invasion, independent of size if no ulceration and ≤ 30 mm if ulcerated. No further staging procedure or treatment is recommended.Curative/low-risk resection (LNM risk < 3 %): en bloc R0 resection; lesion with no lymphovascular invasion and: a) pT1b, invasion ≤ 500 µm, differentiated, size ≤ 30 mm; or b) pT1a, undifferentiated, size ≤ 20 mm and no ulceration. Staging should be completed, and further treatment is generally not necessary, but a multidisciplinary discussion is required. Local-risk resection (very low risk of LNM but increased risk of local persistence/recurrence): Piecemeal resection or tumor-positive horizontal margin of a lesion otherwise meeting curative/very low-risk criteria (or meeting low-risk criteria provided that there is no submucosal invasive tumor at the resection margin in the case of piecemeal resection or tumor-positive horizontal margin for pT1b lesions [invasion ≤ 500 µm; well-differentiated; size ≤ 30 mm, and VM0]). Endoscopic surveillance/re-treatment is recommended rather than other additional treatment. High-risk resection (noncurative): Any lesion with any of the following: (a) a positive vertical margin (if carcinoma) or lymphovascular invasion or deep submucosal invasion (> 500 µm from the muscularis mucosae); (b) poorly differentiated lesions if ulceration or size > 20 mm; (c) pT1b differentiated lesions with submucosal invasion ≤ 500 µm with size > 30 mm; or (d) intramucosal ulcerative lesion with size > 30 mm. Complete staging and strong consideration for additional treatments (surgery) in multidisciplinary discussion.ESGE/EHMSG/ESP suggest the use of validated endoscopic classifications of atrophy (e. g. Kimura-Takemoto) or intestinal metaplasia (e. g. endoscopic grading of gastric intestinal metaplasia [EGGIM]) to endoscopically stage precancerous conditions and stratify the risk for gastric cancer.ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend that biopsies should be taken from at least two topographic sites (2 biopsies from the antrum/incisura and 2 from the corpus, guided by VCE) in two separate, clearly labeled vials. Additional biopsy from the incisura is optional.ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend that patients with extensive endoscopic changes (Kimura C3 + or EGGIM 5 +) or advanced histological stages of atrophic gastritis (severe atrophic changes or intestinal metaplasia, or changes in both antrum and corpus, operative link on gastritis assessment/operative link on gastric intestinal metaplasia [OLGA/OLGIM] III/IV) should be followed up with high quality endoscopy every 3 years, irrespective of the individual's country of origin.ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend that no surveillance is proposed for patients with mild to moderate atrophy or intestinal metaplasia restricted to the antrum, in the absence of endoscopic signs of extensive lesions or other risk factors (family history, incomplete intestinal metaplasia, persistent H. pylori infection). This group constitutes most individuals found in clinical practice.ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend H. pylori eradication for patients with precancerous conditions and after endoscopic or surgical therapy.ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend that patients should be advised to stop smoking and low-dose daily aspirin use may be considered for the prevention of gastric cancer in selected individuals with high risk for cardiovascular events.

Different endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques: a tailored approach

Background and Aims

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an advanced, minimally invasive technique for the removal of GI lesions, offering several advantages over traditional methods, such as EMR. Although ESD facilitates en bloc resection and allows for precise pathologic assessment, its technical complexity underscores the need for tailored approaches. This video aims to provide a detailed explanation of the technical aspects of various ESD methods and to demonstrate the applicability of each technique in different clinical scenarios.

Methods

This video provides a comprehensive, step-by-step technical review of classic ESD techniques as well as various ESD modifications. The most common modifications include pocket, modified pocket, bridge, multiple tunnels, hybrid, and traction-assisted ESD. Limitations of each method are discussed, and how to overcome these limitations using other methods is also addressed.

Results

Pocket ESD is the most commonly used modification, creating a tunnel beneath the lesion. Modified pocket ESD follows a similar approach but combines the steps of dissection and making the circular incision simultaneously. Both methods are considered classic for esophageal lesions, although they also can be applied in colorectal ESD. Bridge ESD involves starting from the cecal side of the lesion, followed by the oral or anal side, and then connecting both sides. This approach provides effective countertraction and is particularly useful in rectal ESD, though it remains applicable in other locations. For circumferential lesions, the multiple tunnel technique is the optimal option for management. Hybrid ESD combines EMR and ESD techniques. Traction-assisted ESD, using simple tools such as a clip in line or band, can be applied in conjunction with all of the aforementioned methods.

Conclusions

The adoption of a tailored ESD approach is crucial for improving procedural success rates, enhancing patient outcomes, and expanding the applicability of ESD to a broader range of complex lesions.

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) for the Management of Fibrotic Non-Lifting Colorectal Lesions (NLCLs): Results from a Large Multicenter Retrospective Study

Background/Objectives: The management of non-lifting colorectal lesions (NLCLs), often resulting from previous unsuccessful treatments or biopsies, remains challenging due to submucosal fibrosis that prevents adequate lifting. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a viable option for achieving complete resection in such cases. However, when standard ESD is not feasible, conversion to hybrid ESD (H-ESD) has been proposed as a rescue strategy. This study aimed to assess ESD's feasibility, effectiveness, and safety for NLCLs, including cases requiring conversion to H-ESD, when performed by experienced endoscopists in tertiary referral centers. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, data from patients with NLCLs treated by ESD/H-ESD between January 2009 and September 2022 were analyzed. The primary endpoint was the recurrence rate (RR). Secondary endpoints included the adverse event (AE) rate, technical success (TS) rate (en bloc resection regardless of technique), complete resection (CR), curative resection (cR) rates, and surgical intervention rate. Predictors of ESD technical success were identified. Results: In total, 178 patients with NLCLs were included (52 previously biopsied, 126 recurrent after previous resection). ESD was used in 111 (62.4%) and H-ESD in 67 (37.6%) cases. During a median follow-up of 373 days (IQR 540), the overall RR was 3.6%. The overall AE rate was 13.4%, and perforation was the most frequent (8.4%). All AEs were successfully managed endoscopically. The TS rate was 71.9%, significantly higher in previously biopsied lesions compared to recurrent ones (78.8% vs. 55.6%, p = 0.04). On multivariate analysis, rectal location (p < 0.001), F1 fibrosis (p = 0.026), and previously biopsied lesions (p = 0.006) predicted ESD TS without the need for conversion to H-ESD. Conclusions: ESD/H-ESD is feasible and safe for NLCLs when performed by experienced operators, with low RR amenable to endoscopic treatment. Previously biopsied lesions, rectal location, and low fibrosis predict ESD TS.

Closure strength of endoscopic hand-suturing in ex vivo porcine gastric ESD defect models: an exploratory animal study

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic hand-suturing (EHS) has been used to close gastrointestinal defects following endoscopic submucosal resection (ESD), but its closure strength needs further evaluation. This exploratory animal study aimed to compare the closure strength of EHS and titanium clips in ex vivo porcine gastric ESD defect models.

METHODS

Fifteen porcine stomachs were used to create ESD defect models, each featuring a 2-3-cm defect in the gastric body and another in the antrum. Defects were randomly assigned to three groups: EHS group (Group A), dense clipping group (Group B), and loose clipping group (Group C). Under endoscopy, Group A defects were sutured with 4 stitches, Group B with 7 clips, and Group C with 4 clips. The primary outcome measures were overall closure strength and closure strength per unit length, measured with a digital spring scale. Differences among groups were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis H test.

RESULT

All 30 defects were successfully closed endoscopically. Group A achieved significantly higher overall closure strength [1.06 kg (0.96 kg, 1.22 kg)] compared to Group B [0.27 kg (0.19 kg, 0.31 kg), P = 0.026] and Group C [0.11 kg (0.09 kg, 0.15 kg), P < 0.001]. For the closure strength per unit length, Group A [0.33 kg (0.27 kg, 0.35 kg)] also outperformed Group B [0.08 kg (0.06 kg, 0.10 kg), P = 0.023] and Group C [0.04 kg (0.03 kg, 0.04 kg), P < 0.001].

CONCLUSION

EHS can provide superior closure strength for ex vivo gastric ESD defects compared to simple titanium clips.

The influence of color vision deficiency on vessel visibility during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection and the potential advantage of red dichromatic imaging to achieve color vision barrier-free

Objectives

Although color information is important in gastrointestinal endoscopy, there are limited studies on how endoscopic images are viewed by people with color vision deficiency. We aimed to investigate the differences in the visibility of blood vessels during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) among people with different color vision characteristics and to examine the effect of red dichromatic imaging (RDI) on blood vessel visibility.

Methods

Seventy-seven pairs of endoscopic images of white light imaging (WLI) and RDI of the same site were obtained during colorectal ESD. The original images were set as type C (WLI-C and RDI-C), a common color vision. These images were computationally converted to simulate images perceived by people with color vision deficiency protanope (Type P) or deutanope (Type D) and denoted as WLI-P and RDI-P or WLI-D and RDI-D. Blood vessels and background submucosa that needed to be identified during ESD were selected in each image, and the color differences between these two objects were measured using the color difference (ΔE 00) to assess the visibility of blood vessels.

Results

ΔE 00 between a blood vessel and the submucosa was greater under RDI (RDI-C/P/D: 24.05 ± 0.64/22.85 ± 0.66/22.61 ± 0.64) than under WLI (WLI-C/P/D: 22.26 ± 0.60/5.19 ± 0.30/8.62 ± 0.42), regardless of color vision characteristics. This improvement was more pronounced in Type P and Type D and approached Type C in RDI.

Conclusions

Color vision characteristics affect the visibility of blood vessels during ESD, and RDI improves blood vessel visibility regardless of color vision characteristics.

Usefulness of the Bridge Formation Method for Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

Aims

Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become a standard treatment for superficial colorectal neoplasms worldwide. However, challenges remain in achieving dissection at the precise layer. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of a novel ESD technique involving natural traction, referred to as the bridge formation method (BFM).

Methods and Results

The two main features of the BFM are creating a large mucosal flap and leaving normal mucosa on both sides of the lesion until the bridge is made at the end of the procedure. This retrospective study included consecutive patients with 2647 colorectal lesions resected by ESD from September 2003 to December 2023. We divided them into the BFM group and the non-BFM group and conducted propensity score matching.After propensity score matching, 1648 cases were enrolled (824 cases in each group). The en bloc resection rate was significantly higher in the BFM than non-BFM group (99.6% vs. 96.7%, p < 0.01). The R0 resection rate and the average dissection speed (㎟/min) were significantly higher in the BFM than non-BFM group (98.8% vs. 96.4%, p < 0.01, and 18.9 vs. 18.0, p = 0.03). The occurrence rates of perforation and delayed bleeding showed no significant difference between the non-BFM and BFM groups (2.8% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.40, and 1.1% vs. 1.0%, p = 1.00).

Conclusions

The BFM is a suitable method for colorectal ESD as it enables rapid dissection and improves both en bloc resection and R0 resection rates.

Artificial intelligence-based automated surgical workflow recognition in esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection: an international multicenter study (with video)

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a crucial yet challenging multi-phase procedure for treating early gastrointestinal cancers. This study developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based automated surgical workflow recognition model for esophageal ESD and proposed an innovative training program based on esophageal ESD videos with or without AI labels to evaluate its effectiveness for trainees.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed complete ESD videos collected from seven hospitals worldwide between 2016 and 2024. The ESD surgical workflow was divided into 6 phases and these videos were divided into five datasets for AI model. Trainees were invited to participate in this multimedia training program and were assigned to the AI or control group randomly. The performance of the AI model and label testing were evaluated using the accuracy.

RESULTS

A total of 195 ESD videos (782,488 s, 9268 phases) were included. The AI model achieved accuracy of 92.08% (95% confidence interval (CI), 91.40-92.76%), 91.71% (95% CI 90.11-93.31%), and 89.84% (95% CI 87.42-92.25%) in the training, internal, and external test dataset (esophagus), respectively. It also achieved acceptable results in the external test dataset (stomach, colorectum). For the training program, the overall label testing accuracy of the AI group learning ESD videos with AI labels was 88.73 ± 2.97%, significantly higher than the control group without AI labels (81.51 ± 4.63%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The AI model achieved high accuracy in the large ESD video datasets. The training program improves understanding of the complexity of ESD workflow and demonstrates the program's effectiveness for trainees.

Prevention strategies of esophageal stenosis after endoscopic resection for superficial esophageal cancer: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

What interventions effectively prevent postoperative stenosis following endoscopic resection (ER) of superficial esophageal cancer? This study aimed to identify effective interventions or combinations through a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

METHODS

Six databases were systematically searched for eligible studies up to 30 April 2023, on interventions to prevent esophageal stenosis post-ER. Odds ratios (ORs) evaluated stenosis rate (primary outcome) and complications (secondary outcome), while mean differences (MD) evaluated endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD) sessions post-stenosis.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies involving 1271 patients and 11 different interventions were included. Eight interventions were effective in preventing post-ER stenosis: oral hydrocortisone sodium succinate and aluminum phosphate gel (OHA) (OR: 0.02, 95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.00-0.11), polyglycolic acid (PGA) + ST (OR: 0.02, 95% CrI: 0.00-0.23), oral tranilast (OT) + preemptive endoscopic balloon dilatation (PEBD) (OR: 0.08, 95% CrI: 0.01-0.77), botulinum toxin (BT) (OR: 0.10, 95% CrI: 0.03-0.32), ST (OR: 0.08, 95% CrI: 0.01-0.67), oral steroid (OS) (OR: 0.11, 95% CrI: 0.05-0.28), endoscopic triamcinolone injection (ETI) + OS (OR: 0.17, 95% CrI: 0.07-0.42), and ETI (OR: 0.18, 95% CrI: 0.11-0.30). Five interventions significantly reduced EBD sessions: PGA + ST (MD: -5.78, 95% CrI: -11.04 to -1.21), ETI + OS (MD: -3.27, 95% CrI: -5.37 to -0.72), OS (MD: -6.18, 95% CrI: -9.43 to -3.38), ETI (MD: -3.81, 95% CrI: -5.74 to -1.99), and BT (MD: -2.16, 95% CrI: -4.12 to -0.40). None of the interventions significantly increased complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed the efficacy of OS, ETI, and ETI + OS and verified five other interventions (OHA, PGA + ST, OT + PEBD, BT, and ST) in preventing stenosis. Notably, PGA + ST and BT also reduced the number of EBD sessions.

Timing of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Resumption Following Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Nationwide Study in Japan

INTRODUCTION

With the increasing use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), managing these agents around endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is crucial. However, due to the need for a large number of cases, studies examining the timing of resumption are lacking, resulting in varied recommendations across international guidelines. We aimed to perform a comparative study about the resumption timing of DOACs after colorectal ESD using a nationwide database in Japan.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study on colorectal ESD using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database from 2012 to 2023. Patients using anticoagulants other than DOACs were excluded, and only those who resumed DOACs within 3 days were included. From eligible patients, we divided them into early (the day after ESD) and delayed (2-3 days after ESD) resumption groups. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting to assess the delayed bleeding and thromboembolic events within 30 days. Delayed bleeding was defined as bleeding requiring endoscopic hemostasis or blood transfusion after ESD.

RESULTS

Of 176,139 colorectal ESDs, 3,550 involved DOAC users, with 2,698 (76%) categorized as early resumption and 852 (24%) categorized as delayed resumption groups. After inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment, the early resumption group did not significantly increase delayed bleeding compared with the delayed resumption group (odds ratio 1.05; 95% confidence interval 0.78-1.42; P = 0.73). However, it significantly reduced the risk of thromboembolic events (odds ratio 0.45; 95% confidence interval 0.25-0.82; P < 0.01).

DISCUSSION

Resuming DOACs the day after colorectal ESD was associated with reduced thromboembolic events without significant increase in risk of delayed bleeding.

Prospective single-arm trial on feasibility and safety of an endoscopic robotic system for colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND

The development of the EndoMaster "Endoluminal Access Surgical Efficacy" (EASE) system aims to enhance the safety and efficacy of colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) through two flexible robotic arms. This is the first clinical trial to evaluate the performance of colorectal ESD using EndoMaster.

METHOD

Patients with early mucosal colorectal neoplasia that was not suitable for en bloc resection with snare-based techniques were recruited. The EndoMaster EASE robotic system consisted of an independently designed flexible robotic platform with two robotic arms. The primary outcome was the complete resection rate using EndoMaster. Secondary outcomes included operating time, hospital stay, procedure-related complications, and oncologic outcomes.

RESULTS

43 patients underwent robotic ESD, with a median robotic dissection time of 49 minutes. The technical success rate was 86.0%, while en bloc resection rate among cases with technical success was 94.6%. The complete resection rate was 83.8% and the median size of specimen was 35 mm (range 15-90 mm). The median hospital stay was 2 (range 1-7) days and there was one delayed bleed after 4 days, which was controlled endoscopically. One patient sustained perforation during the procedure, which was completely closed using clips without sequelae. Two patients were treated by salvage surgery.

CONCLUSION

This first clinical trial confirmed the safety and efficacy of performing colorectal ESD using the EndoMaster EASE robotic system.

Underwater versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Effect of underwater endoscopic submucosal dissection (UESD) on clinical outcomes as compared with conventional ESD (CESD) remains unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis of the available data.

METHODS

Online databases were searched for studies comparing UESD with CESD for colorectal lesions. The outcomes of interest were en-bloc resection, R0 resection, procedure time (minutes), dissection speed (mm2/min), and adverse events. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and standardized mean difference (SMD), along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

Seven studies with 1401 patients (UESD, 452; CESD, 949) were included. Mean patient age was 69 years, and 57% of patients were men. UESD had both a shorter procedure time (SMD, -1.33; 95% CI, -2.34 to -.32; P = .010) and greater dissection speed (SMD, 1.01; 95% CI, .35-1.68; P = .003) when compared with CESD. No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups with respect to en-bloc resection (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, .37-3.41), R0 resection (OR, 2.36; 95% CI, .79-7.05), delayed bleeding (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, .65-2.74), perforation (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, .64-2.00), and postresection electrocoagulation syndrome (OR, .38; 95% CI, .10-1.42).

CONCLUSIONS

UESD was faster in patients with colorectal lesions but had comparable rates of en-bloc resection, R0 resection, and adverse events when compared with CESD.

Nomogram as a novel predictive tool for postoperative pneumonia after endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal carcinomas: a multicenter retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

Adverse events, such as postoperative pneumonia, can occur in some patients after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, few studies have investigated it. As such, we aimed to develop a nomogram to evaluate the progression of postoperative pneumonia after esophageal ESD.

METHODS

Between January 2014 and November 2023, this multicenter retrospective study enrolled patients received esophageal ESD. Data from 492 patients who underwent esophageal ESD were collected for model development. Clinical features and procedure-related characteristics were analyzed. A novel nomogram was constructed based on the results of multivariable logistic regression analysis. Besides, data from 226 and 101 patients were collected for internal and external validation, respectively. Subsequently, the discrimination, calibration, and clinical practice ability of the nomogram were evaluated.

RESULTS

The incidence of postoperative pneumonia after esophageal ESD was 18.6%. Female (OR 1.770, P = 0.027), older age (OR 1.729, P = 0.044), low serum albumin level (OR 2.115, P = 0.003), long operative duration (OR 6.853, P < 0.001), muscular layer damage (OR 1.507, P = 0.136) and comorbid pulmonary disease (OR 1.206, P = 0.594) were found to be statistically or clinically significant factors to predict postoperative pneumonia after esophageal ESD, based on which a nomogram was developed. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.76 and 0.89 in the internal and external validation cohort, respectively. The calibration curve and decision curve analysis exhibited favorable results both in the two validation cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first nomogram built, including sex, age, serum albumin level, operative duration, muscular layer damage, and comorbid pulmonary disease, to predict postoperative pneumonia after esophageal ESD.

Humanistic and graded psychological nursing care for patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastrointestinal tumors

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become a widely accepted, minimally invasive treatment for gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. It has been reported that humanistic nursing care with graded psychological interventions can effectively enhance patients’ physical activity in patients, reduce postoperative complications, and improve their postoperative quality of life.

AIM

To investigate the effects of combining humanistic care with graded psychological support on nursing satisfaction and quality of life in patients undergoing ESD for gastrointestinal submucosal tumors.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 180 patients who underwent ESD surgery for gastrointestinal submucosal tumors at our hospital between March 2021 and February 2023. Patients were allocated into groups based on the nursing care they received: The control group, which received routine care (n = 90), and the observation group, which was subjected to humanistic nursing care in combination with graded psychological support (n = 90). Patient anxiety and depression were assessed using the self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS). Quality of life was evaluated using the short-form 36 health survey, and additional indications such as time to first food intake, surgery duration, length of hospital stay, nursing satisfaction, and adverse reactions were also recorded. Data was analyzed using SPSS22.0, with t-tests employed for continuous variables and χ² tests for categorical data.

RESULTS

Patients in the observation group experienced significantly shorter times to first postoperative meal, surgery, and hospital stay compared to the control group. After the intervention, the SAS score of the observation group was 43.17 ± 5.68, and the SDS score was 41.57 ± 6.52, both significantly lower than those of the control group, with SAS score of 52.38 ± 5.21 and SDS score of 51.23 ± 8.25. In addition, the observation group scored significantly higher in daily living, physical function, psychological well-being, and social functioning (80.01 ± 6.39, 83.59 ± 6.89, 81.69 ± 5.34, and 85.23 ± 6.05, respectively). Moreover, the observation group also exhibited higher satisfaction and self-efficacy scores and a lower incidence of adverse reactions compared to the control group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

For patients undergoing ESD for gastrointestinal submucosal tumors, humanistic nursing care in combination with graded psychological nursing care significantly shorten the times to first postoperative meal, surgery, and hospital stay, effectively alleviates anxiety and depression, improves quality of life and nursing satisfaction, and mitigate the incidence of adverse reactions.

Colitis-Associated Dysplasia in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Features and Endoscopic Management

Patients with long-standing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) involving the colon are at higher risk of developing colorectal dysplastic or neoplastic lesions. While from sporadic colorectal cancer follows an "adenoma-carcinoma" sequence, IBD colitis-associated carcinogenesis is mainly related to an "inflammation-dysplasia-carcinoma" sequence. Currently, specific endoscopic surveillance strategies involving dye spray and virtual chromoendoscopy have been standardized, aiming for early CRC diagnosis. When detected, colitis-associated dysplasia should be classified according to standard classification, thus allowing for better treatment. Indeed, most IBD-associated dysplastic lesions can be treated with endoscopic resection, even though available procedures are usually more challenging than those in the general population. The higher frequency of severe submucosal fibrosis and the difficulty in the definition of lesions' margins account for this issue. Current endoscopic resection techniques include polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Recent evidence suggests the relevance of en bloc resection, as this may be associated with lower rates of recurrence. Therefore, particularly for larger (>20 mm) lesions, ESD should be preferred, even though it is considered the most difficult technique due to frequent severe submucosal fibrosis. Considering the growing number of new endoscopic resective techniques, including underwater EMR or ESD, which in the general population have been suggested to lower procedure-related risks and may also allow a larger spread of advanced endoscopic resection in IBD. However, additional data are needed to assess the medium- and long-term efficacy of endoscopic resection of visible dysplasia in IBD patients, which are burdened by a high risk of local and, more importantly, metachronous recurrence.

Effectiveness of glucocorticoids in preventing esophageal stricture and predictors of stricture after esophageal ESD: 5 years of experience in a single medical center

Background

Esophageal stricture is one of the major complications after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of the esophagus. However, even with steroid prophylaxis, stenosis still occurs in up to 45% of patients. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of steroid therapy in preventing esophageal strictures after ESD, as well as to assess the predictors of esophageal strictures after the application of steroids.

Methods

Between February 2018 and March 2023, 207 patients who underwent esophageal ESD at Southeast University Affiliated Zhongda Hospital were retrospectively enrolled. We evaluated stenosis rate, number of endoscopic dilations after ESD, the interval between the first endoscopic dilatation after ESD and explored risk factors for strictures after steroid prophylaxis.

Results

In the control group, the oral steroids group, and the combined group, the stenosis rates were 83/87 (95.4%), 44/53 (83.0%), and 56/67 (83.6%), respectively; the number of endoscopic dilations were 3.43 (±2.22), 2.34 (±2.17), and 1.52 (±1.25), respectively; the time intervals between first endoscopic dilation and ESD procedure were 38.36 (±6.87), 68.18 (±9.49), and 96.82 (±8.41) days, respectively; all these indicators were significantly better in the oral and combined groups than in the control group (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis identified lesion circumference ≥ 5/6th and submucosal injection of solution were two independent factors on esophageal stricture formation (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Steroid prophylaxis is effective and safe in preventing esophageal stenosis. Moreover, lesion circumference and submucosal injection of sodium hyaluronate were two independent factors on esophageal stricture formation even with steroids administration.

Endoscopic calabash technique for gastric mesenchymal tumours: A low hanging fruit or a novel endoscopic technique?

The term subepithelial lesions encompasses a wide array of pathology of which numerous benign and malignant pathologies are grouped. A subset of these lesions are termed gastric mesenchymal tumours of which some have innate malignant potential. Currently there is various guidance on the recommended approach to the investigation and management of these lesions and there exists multiple methods of resection. Lin et al have developed and proposed a new method of resection of these gastric mesenchymal tumours within the field of endoscopy, a procedure they have termed endoscopic calabash ligation and resection. This editorial aims to outlay the current landscape for gastric mesenchymal tumours with regards to the various guidelines and resection techniques while comparing Lin et al's new technique to those that are already established in the field of endoscopy. Advancements in endoscopy that maintain or improve patient outcomes compared to the gold standard approach are exciting developments. Lin et al's study suggests that their technique is comparable in regard to patient outcomes while simultaneously being more efficient in its use of hospital resources including procedural time. Whilst the data and analysis proposed in the study is promising, there are areas that need to be addressed before advocating the procedure for widespread use. However, with further studies and analysis this may be foreseeable in the future.

Novel minimally invasive strategies for achieving source control in intra-abdominal infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an overview of recent advancements in minimally invasive intra-abdominal source control techniques.

RECENT FINDINGS

There have been multiple recent advances in minimally invasive techniques for managing intra-abdominal infection or sepsis. Endoscopic based interventions include stenting, suturing, clip placement, and endoscopic vacuum therapy. Robotic surgery is becoming progressively more popular in emergency general surgery and offers comparable results compared to laparoscopic surgery with lower rates of conversion to open.

SUMMARY

Endoscopic based interventions and minimally invasive surgery offer comparable outcomes to more invasive interventions with less morbidity for patients, though the ability to perform these techniques may not be limited to tertiary and quaternary health centers. Providers must use their clinical judgment to determine the best course of action.

Preoperative liquid biopsy transcriptomic panel for risk assessment of lymph node metastasis in T1 gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The increasing incidence of early-stage T1 gastric cancer (GC) underscores the need for accurate preoperative risk stratification of lymph node metastasis (LNM). Current pathological assessments often misclassify patients, leading to unnecessary radical surgeries.

METHODS

Through analysis of transcriptomic data from public databases and T1 GC tissues, we identified a 4-mRNA panel (SDS, TESMIN, NEB, and GRB14). We developed and validated a Risk Stratification Assessment (RSA) model combining this panel with clinical features using surgical specimens (training cohort: n = 218; validation cohort: n = 186), gastroscopic biopsies (n = 122), and liquid biopsies (training cohort: n = 147; validation cohort: n = 168).

RESULTS

The RSA model demonstrated excellent predictive accuracy for LNM in surgical specimens (training AUC = 0.890, validation AUC = 0.878), gastroscopic biopsies (AUC = 0.928), and liquid biopsies (training AUC = 0.873, validation AUC = 0.852). This model significantly reduced overtreatment rates from 83.9 to 44.1% in tissue specimens and from 84.4 to 56.0% in liquid biopsies. The 4-mRNA panel showed specificity for T1 GC compared to other gastrointestinal cancers (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We developed and validated a novel liquid biopsy-based RSA model that accurately predicts LNM in T1 GC patients. This non-invasive approach could significantly reduce unnecessary surgical interventions and optimize treatment strategies for high-risk T1 GC patients.

Meta-Analysis of Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection Versus Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Complex Colorectal Lesions

BACKGROUND

Studies evaluating endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for complex colorectal lesions have shown variable results. We conducted a meta-analysis of the available data.

METHODS

Online databases were searched for studies comparing EFTR versus ESD for complex colorectal lesions. The outcomes of interest were resection rates, procedure time (min), and complications. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) along with 95% CI were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 4 studies with 530 patients (n=215 EFTR, n=315 ESD) were included. The mean follow-up duration was 5 months. The mean age of the patients was 68 years and 64% were men. The EFTR and ESD groups had similar rates of en bloc resection (OR: 1.73, 95% CI: 0.60-4.97, P =0.31) and R0 resection (OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 0.55-4.14, P =0.42). The EFTR group had significantly reduced procedure time (SMD -1.87, 95% CI: -3.13 to -0.61, P =0.004), total complications (OR: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.13-0.44, P <0.00001), perforation (OR: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.03-0.39, P =0.0005) and postresection electrocoagulation syndrome (OR: 0.06, 95% CI: 0.01-0.48, P =0.008). Delayed bleeding was similar in the 2 groups (OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.30-2.12, P =0.66). Residual/recurrent lesions were significantly higher in the EFTR group (OR: 4.67, 95% CI: 1.39-15.66, P =0.01).

DISCUSSION

This meta-analysis of small studies with high heterogeneity showed that EFTR and ESD have comparable resection rates for complex colorectal lesions. EFTR is faster and has fewer complications, but it increases residual or recurrent lesions.

Critical considerations for co-administering rivaroxaban and vonoprazan: Unveiling potential pharmacokinetic interactions

To study the effects of metabolic enzyme activity inhibition and genetic polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban, we established an in vitro enzymatic reaction system to screen for inhibitors, and used the UPLC-MS/MS method to detect the levels of rivaroxaban and its metabolite M2-1. Additionally, in vivo pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies were conducted using Sprague-Dawley rats. Human recombinant CYP2J2 baculosomes were prepared using a baculovirus-insect expression system to investigate the impact of genetic polymorphisms on rivaroxaban metabolism through enzyme kinetics methods. The results demonstrated that acid-suppressing drugs strongly inhibited the metabolism of rivaroxaban in vitro. Among them, vonoprazan significantly increased the systemic exposure of rivaroxaban in vivo, while also prolonging prothrombin time, likely due to the competitive binding of vonoprazan and rivaroxaban to CYP2J2. Moreover, the genetic polymorphisms of CYP2J2 determined the metabolic characteristics of rivaroxaban and the inhibitory potency of vonoprazan. Overall, our findings suggest that vonoprazan-induced inhibition of CYP2J2 activity can affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban, with the extent of inhibition determined by the genetic polymorphism of CYP2J2. These insights have important implications for the precise management of rivaroxaban in humans.

Gastric polyps are not created equal: Know your enemy

Gastric polyps are commonly detected during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. They are most often benign and rarely become malignant. Nevertheless, adequate knowledge, diagnostic modalities, and management strategies should be the endoscopist's readily available "weapons" to defeat the potentially malignant "enemies". This article sheds light on the valuable effort by Costa et al to generate a new classification system of gastric polyps as "good", "bad", and "ugly". This comprehensive overview provides clinicians with a simplified decision-making process.

Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for T1b colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a standardized procedure for intramucosal and slightly invasive submucosal colorectal cancers (CRC). However, the role of ESD for T1b (depth of submucosal invasion: ≥1,000 μm) CRC remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of ESD for T1b CRC.

METHODS

This study involved 50 patients with T1b CRC who underwent ESD, including 31 who received subsequent surgery (ESD + surgery group) and 19 who reported comorbidities or refused subsequent surgery (ESD-alone group). The clinical outcomes, lymph node metastasis (LNM) rate, and recurrence and survival rates were determined.

RESULTS

All the patients achieved en-bloc resection, and 41 patients achieved R0 resection. The mean tumor diameter was 31.2 ± 11.9 mm. LNM was detected in 3 (6%) cases, demonstrating high-grade tumor budding (Bd 2/3) and invasion depth of >1,500 um. LNM was significantly correlated with tumor budding (P = 0.030). The overall median follow-up period was 41.00 ± 27.69 months and 33.16 ± 19.05 months in the ESD-alone and ESD + surgery groups, respectively (P = 0.241). Two patients in the ESD group had local recurrence and two patients died. Patients in the ESD + surgery group reported no local recurrence, distant metastasis, or disease-related death. Recurrence (P = 0.074) and survival rates (P = 0.072) were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The LNM rate was exceedingly low in patients with T1b. ESD is an effective and safe method for these patients. The necessity of additional surgical treatment after ESD should be comprehensively determined following the patient's characteristics.

Safety and performance of the HYBRIDknife flex in a porcine model of esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection: A pilot study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is considered the best modality for achieving en bloc resection of larger neoplastic mucosal lesions in the upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Multiple devices are available for ESD, and refinements continue to be made to develop devices that improve the safety and efficiency of performing ESD. Submucosal injection with viscous fluids like glycerol, which prolong submucosal expansion, could facilitate the procedure. We aimed to evaluate the safety and performance of the new Erbe HYBRIDknife® flex, which combines electrosurgical dissection with waterjet-assisted injection in a slim and flexible form factor.

METHODS

In a prospective animal study with six pigs, four endoscopists, each with 10-20 years of experience in ESD, performed 28 esophageal ESDs. One half was performed with physiological saline injectate, the other half with fructose-added glycerol. Various performance aspects were evaluated on a five-point scale [5 = best], including dissection properties, handling, and usability.

RESULTS

No perforations or major bleeding occurred. All resections were performed en bloc, with one technical failure (3.6%, 1 of 28). Performance scores were similar for saline and glycerol (4.5 ± 0.31 vs. 4.5 ± 0.32, P = 0.36), as was dissection speed (13 ± 6.2 mm2/min vs. 15 ± 6.1 mm2/min, P = 0.22).

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that esophageal ESD can be performed safely and rapidly using HYBRIDknife flex, with excellent performance evaluation by the endoscopists. Combining this device with glycerol or saline is precise and effective for ESD, although experience could compensate for the theoretical disadvantage of using normal saline.

Endoscopic Resection for Colorectal Tumors

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic resection techniques for colorectal tumors are constantly evolving with improvements.

SUMMARY

Over the past decade, there has been a paradigm shift toward cold polypectomy for the removal of small lesions (<10 mm), known as the "cold revolution". In recent years, underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) has emerged as an alternative to conventional EMR and has been gaining popularity for resection of intermediate and large-sized lesions (≥10 mm). Although colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) requires a high level of advanced skills, improvements in dissection techniques and devices have facilitated the procedure. In Japan, the safety and efficacy of ESD for resecting large lesions (≥20 mm) have been demonstrated in a large-scale, multicenter, prospective cohort study (CREATE-J). ESD is also being increasingly adopted in Western countries. As endoscopic resection continues to advance and include large and more complex defects, a variety of closure techniques and new devices are being developed. Meanwhile, the number of endoscopic resections for T1-colorectal cancer (T1-CRC), including those intended for total excisional biopsy, has been increasing owing to the aging population and improvements in endoscopic technique.

KEY MESSAGES

This review provides a broad summary of endoscopic resection for colorectal tumors including advancements in closure techniques and devices for mucosal defects, as well as the potential role of endoscopic resection for patients with T1-CRC.

Improved Adenoma Detection Rate Using a Novel Colonoscopic Distal Attachment: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the effect of Embrella, a novel-designed colonoscopic distal attachment, on adenoma detection rate (ADR) and adenoma per colonoscopy (APC), compared with standard colonoscopy in routine practice.

METHODS

All consecutive participants who underwent routine colonoscopic examinations at 3 endoscopy centers in China were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the Embrella-assisted colonoscopy (EAC) or standard colonoscopy (SC) groups. ADR, APC, inspection time, pain scores, and adverse events were recorded.

RESULTS

Overall, 1,179 participants were randomized into the EAC (n = 593) and SC groups (n = 586). EAC increased the overall ADR from 24.6% to 34.2% ( P < 0.001) and improved APC from 0.44 to 0.64 ( P = 0.002). Subgroup analyses indicated that EAC significantly improved ADR for adenomas < 10 mm (13.8% vs 8.5%, P = 0.004 for 5-9 mm and 27.0% vs 17.2%, P < 0.001 for < 5 mm), nonpedunculated adenomas (26.6% vs 18.8%, P < 0.001), and adenomas in the transverse (10.8% vs 6.1%, P = 0.004) and left colon (21.6% vs 13.7%, P < 0.001). APC in the subgroup analyses was consistent with ADR. The mean inspection time was shorter with EAC (6.52 vs 6.68 minutes, P = 0.046), with no significant impact on participants' pain scores ( P = 0.377). Moreover, no EAC-related adverse events occurred.

DISCUSSION

EAC significantly increased ADR and APC compared with SC, particularly for adenomas <10 mm, nonpedunculated adenomas, and adenomas in the transverse and left colon.

Conventional Versus Traction Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Tumors: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

INTRODUCTION

Compared with conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection (C-ESD) for colorectal lesions, the traction method (T-ESD) allows the lesion to be stabilized with easier dissection. However, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported conflicting results on the clinical outcomes of T-ESD as compared with C-ESD. We conducted a meta-analysis to compile the data.

METHODS

Multiple databases were searched for RCTs evaluating C-ESD versus T-ESD for colorectal tumors. The end points of interest were procedure time (min), resection speed (mm²/min), R0 resection, en bloc resection, delayed bleeding, and perforation. Standard meta-analysis methods were employed using the random-effects model.

RESULTS

Six RCTs with a total of 566 patients (C-ESD n=284, T-ESD n=282) were included. The mean age was 67±10 y and 60% were men. As compared with the T-ESD technique, the C-ESD group was associated with longer procedure time (SMD 0.91, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.23, P <0.00001) and lesser resection speed (SMD -1.03, 95% CI -2.01 to -0.06, P =0.04). No significant difference was found in the 2 groups with respect to R0 resection rate (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.06, P =0.87), en bloc resection (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.01, P =0.35), delayed bleeding (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.17 to 2.59, P =0.55) and perforation (RR 2.16, 95% CI 0.75 to 6.27, P =0.16).

DISCUSSION

On meta-analysis, pooled procedure time was significantly faster with T-ESD compared with C-ESD. The clinical outcomes, however, were comparable.

Safety and Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Rectal Neoplasms Extending to the Dentate Line: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a superior, minimally invasive technique compared with other snare-based endoscopic resection techniques for rectal neoplasms extending to the dentate line (RNDLs). However, performing a successful ESD in the anal canal can be challenging due to vascularity and limited scope stability. In this meta-analysis, we aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ESD for RNDLs.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive electronic database search from January 2005 through January 2024 for studies evaluating outcomes of ESD performed for managing RNDLs. Pooled proportions were calculated using random-effect models. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I2 and Q statistics.

RESULTS

Data were extracted from 11 studies comprising 496 patients. The pooled en bloc resection rates were 93.60% (95% CI = 90.70-95.70). The pooled R0 resection rate was 80.60% (95% CI = 70.50-87.80). The pooled recurrence rate was 4.00% (95% CI = 2.40-6.50). There was no evidence of significant heterogeneity calculated using the Q test and I2 statistic. The main adverse events were anal pain, postprocedural bleeding, and anal stricture with pooled rates of 20.20% (95% CI = 14.80-26.90), 8.20% (95% CI = 4.70-14.0), and 3.50% (95% CI = 2.10-5.70), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

ESD is a safe and effective option for managing RNDLs with a low recurrence rate. Adverse events such as postprocedural perianal pain, postprocedural bleeding, and anal stenosis seem to be more common compared with colorectal ESD done for more proximal lesions. However, these can typically be managed conservatively or with minimally invasive endoscopic techniques.

Underwater Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Diving into the Depths

The endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal tract lesions embraces different types of techniques, ranging from conventional polypectomy/endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) to the field of third-space endoscopy, including endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), full-thickness resection and peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Parallelly, the advent of underwater techniques has served as an add-on for both basic and advanced procedures, since its first report in 2012. We aimed to provide a comprehensive update on the state of the art about the feasibility of underwater basic and advanced techniques for GI endoscopy. Underwater EMR (U-EMR) has proved effective and safe in treating > 10 mm sessile or flat or all-size recurrent colonic lesions. Conversely, although data show good effectiveness and safety for <10 mm lesions, it is preferred when high-grade dysplasia is suspected, favouring cold snare polypectomy for all other cases. Moreover, promising data are emerging regarding the feasibility of U-ESD for difficult-to-resect colonic lesions. U-EMR represents a standard of care for treating < 25 mm superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumours. Data regarding oesophageal, gastric and ampullary lesions remains limited to small cohorts. Finally, using water immersion for POEM has shown a reduction in procedure time compared to the CO2 insufflation technique for vessel coagulation, albeit in a single-centre experience. Based on these results, U-EMR has become a standard for treating intermediate-size colonic and non-ampullary duodenal lesions, as highlighted also in the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines. Promising results have been shown in third-space endoscopy studies, even though further prospective studies are awaited to standardise the technique for both ESD and POEM.

Clinical utility of a novel anchor pronged clip for mucosal defect closure after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video)

Background and study aims The MANTIS Clip (Boston Scientific) is a novel anchor pronged clip designed to enhance tissue grasping and facilitate the closure of defects in the gastrointestinal tract. This study evaluates the feasibility and effectiveness of the MANTIS Clip for closing mucosal defects following colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (C-ESD). Patients and methods A retrospective single-center study was conducted on patients who underwent C-ESD with MANTIS Clip closure from May 2023 to April 2024. The primary outcome measured was the complete closure success rate. Secondary outcomes included defect size, sustained closure rate, closure time, number of clips used, adverse events (AEs), and hospital stay duration. Results The MANTIS Clip was used in 52 cases. The complete closure rate was 98.1% (51/52), with a sustained closure rate of 96.1% (49/51). The median closed defect size was 32 mm, with the largest being 62 mm. The median closure time was 8 minutes. Typically, one MANTIS Clip per defect was used, with only one lesion requiring two clips. The median number of additional clips used was seven. AEs included one case of bleeding (1.9%) and one case of post-ESD coagulation syndrome (1.9%), both managed without extending hospital stays. The median C-reactive protein level on the first day post-ESD was 0.35 mg/dL and the median hospital stay was 5 days. Conclusions The MANTIS Clip is effective and practical for mucosal defect closure post-C-ESD, demonstrating high success and sustained closure rates with minimal complications. Future multicenter randomized trials are needed to further assess its efficacy and safety.

Predictors of stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection of the esophagus and steroids application

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a reliable method to resect early esophageal cancer. Esophageal stricture is one of the major complications after ESD of the esophagus. Steroid prophylaxis for esophageal strictures, particularly local injection of triamcinolone acetonide (TA), is a relatively effective method to prevent esophageal strictures. However, even with steroid prophylaxis, stenosis still occurs in up to 45% of patients. Predicting the risk of stenosis formation after local TA injection would enable additional interventions in risky patients.

AIM

To identify the predictors of esophageal strictures after steroids application.

METHODS

Patients who underwent esophageal ESD and steroid prophylaxis and who were comprehensively assessed for lesion- and ESD-related factors at Southeast University Affiliated Zhongda Hospital between February 2018 and March 2023 were included in the study. The univariate and multivariate regression analyses were conducted to identify the predictors of stricture among patients undergoing steroid prophylaxis.

RESULTS

A total of 120 patients were included in the analysis. In the oral prednisone and oral prednisone combined with local tretinoin injection groups, the stenosis rates were 44/53 (83.0%) and 56/67 (83.6%), respectively. Among them, univariate analysis showed that the lesion circumference (P = 0.01) and submucosal injection solution (P = 0.04) showed significant correlation with the risk of stenosis formation. Logistic regression analyses were then performed using predictors that were significant in the univariate analyses and combined with known predictors from previous reports, such as additional chemoradiotherapy and tumor location. We identified a lesion circumference < 5/6 (OR = 0.19; P = 0.02) and submucosal injection of sodium hyaluronate (OR = 0.15; P = 0.03) as independent predictors of on esophageal stricture formation.

CONCLUSION

Steroid prophylaxis effectively prevents stenosis. Moreover, the lesion circumference and submucosal injection of sodium hyaluronate were independent predictors of esophageal strictures. Additional interventions should be considered in high-risk patients.

A novel three traction rings device with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the removal of a large superficial duodenal adenoma

Endoscopic treatment is generally recommended for the duodenal epithelial adenoma. Although underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) has become established as an effective modality for the superficial duodenal adenoma. However, it is difficult to completely remove a large superficial duodenal adenoma with en bloc resection. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is commonly performed to remove a large superficial duodenal adenoma, whereas which is technically challenged with severe adverse events. It has reported that entire traction using clip-and-nylon ring with ESD was effective and safe in the removal of a large rectal sessile serrated adenoma (SSA). Herein, we shared our experience of the novel three traction rings device in the treatment of a large superficial duodenal adenoma.

The 2023 top 10 list of endoscopy topics in medical publishing: an annual review by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Editorial Board

Using a systematic literature search of original articles published during 2023 in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (GIE) and other high-impact medical and gastroenterology journals, the GIE Editorial Board of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy compiled a list of the top 10 most significant topic areas in general and advanced GI endoscopy during the year. Each GIE Editorial Board member was directed to consider 3 criteria in generating candidate topics-significance, novelty, and impact on global clinical practice-and subject matter consensus was facilitated by the Chair through electronic voting and a meeting of the entire GIE Editorial Board. The 10 identified areas collectively represent advances in the following endoscopic spheres: GI bleeding, endohepatology, endoscopic palliation, artificial intelligence and polyp detection, artificial intelligence beyond the colon, better polypectomy and EMR, how to make endoscopy units greener, high-quality upper endoscopy, endoscopic tissue apposition and closure devices, and endoscopic submucosal dissection. Each board member was assigned a topic area around which to summarize relevant important articles, thereby generating this overview of the "top 10" endoscopic advances of 2023.

Multicenter prospective randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the pocket-creation method with and without single-clip traction of colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND

The pocket-creation method (PCM) was developed to overcome the technical difficulties of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), although opening the pocket remains challenging. We developed a novel technique of PCM with single-clip traction (PCM-CT), which uses a reopenable clip as a traction device to maintain stability during the procedure. No prospective study has compared the efficacy of PCM-CT and PCM. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of PCM-CT vs. PCM in a randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

This randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted at four Japanese institutions. Patients with superficial colorectal neoplastic lesions were included following Japanese guidelines for colorectal cancer. Seven moderately experienced endoscopists performed the ESD procedures using either PCM-CT or PCM.

RESULTS

100 patients were enrolled in the study. Compared with PCM, PCM-CT achieved significantly faster mean (SD) dissection speed (21.4 [10.8] vs. 27.0 [14.5] mm2/min [95%CI 0.5 to 10.7], P = 0.03), and reduced the mean procedure time (81.8 [57.9] vs. 64.8 [47.6] minutes [95%CI -38.2 to 4.3], P = 0.12) and pocket-opening time (37.8 [33.0] vs. 30.0 [28.9] minutes [95%CI -20.2 to 4.6], P = 0.22). En bloc and R0 resection rates were not significantly different between the two groups (100% vs. 100%, P >0.99; 100% vs. 96%, P = 0.50, respectively). No significant differences were observed in adverse events between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

ESD facilitated by the novel PCM-CT method appeared to be significantly faster than PCM. Both methods achieved high R0 resection rates.

Endoscopic removal of gastrointestinal lesions by using third space endoscopy techniques

The concept of submucosal space, or rather the "third space", located between the intact mucosal flap and the muscularis propria layer of the gastrointestinal tract, represents a tunnel that the endoscopist could use to perform interventions in the muscularis propria layer or breech it to enter the mediastinum or the peritoneal cavity without full thickness perforation. The tunnel technique can be used both for the removal of mucosal tumours, called endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection (ESTD), for the removal of subepithelial tumours (SELs), called submucosal tunnelling endoscopic resection (STER), and for the removal of extra-luminal lesions (for example in the mediastinum or in the rectum), called submucosal tunnelling endoscopic resection for extraluminal tumours (STER-ET). Aim of this updated narrative review, is to summarize the evidences that analyses indications, and outcomes of tunnelling techniques for the treatment of above mentioned lesions.

Outcome of Endoscopic Resection of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors ≤ 10 mm

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Guidelines suggest endoscopic resection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors (rNETs) < 10 mm, but the most appropriate resection technique is unclear. In real-life clinical practice, the endoscopic removal of unrecognized rNETs can take place with "simple" techniques and without preliminary staging. The aim of the current study is to report our own experience at a referral center for both neuroendocrine neoplasms and endoscopy.

METHODS

Retrospective analyses of polypectomies were performed at the Humanitas Research Hospital for rNETs (already diagnosed or previously unrecognized).

RESULTS

A total of 19 patients were included, with a median lesion size of 5 mm (range 3-10 mm). Only five lesions were suspected as NETs before removal and underwent endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) before resection, being removed with advanced endoscopic techniques. Unsuspected rNETs were removed by cold polypectomy in eleven cases, EMR in two, and biopsy forceps in one. When described, the margins were negative in four cases, positive in four (R1), and indeterminate in one. The median follow-up was 40 months. A 10 mm polypoid lesion removed with cold snare polypectomy (G2 R1) needed subsequent surgery. Eighteen patients underwent EUS after a median time of 6.5 months from resection. The EUS identified local recurrence after 14 months in a 7 mm polypoid lesion removed with cold snare polypectomy (G1 R1); the lesion was treated with cap-assisted EMR. For all the other lesions, the follow-up was negative.

CONCLUSIONS

When rNETs are improperly removed without prior staging, caution must be exercised. The data from our cohort suggest that even if inappropriate resection had happened, patients may be safely managed with early EUS evaluation.

Learning curve for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the United States: Large, untutored, single-operator experience

Background and study aims Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows removal of tumors en-bloc. Western adoption of ESD has been hindered by its steep learning curve. Western data regarding ESD learning curve are limited. We analyzed the learning curve of a single endoscopist at a tertiary referral center in the United States. Patients and methods All consecutive ESDs performed by a single endoscopist at a tertiary referral center in the United States from 2015 through 2022 were identified. Descriptive statistics and CUSUM analysis were used to describe the learning curve for en-bloc, R0 resection, and resection speed. Results In our study, 503 patients with 515 lesions were included. Severe submucosal fibrosis was found in 17% of the lesions. The rates of en-bloc, R0, and curative resections were 81.9%, 71.1%, and 68.4%, respectively. CUSUM analysis showed that the learning curve plateaued at 268, 347, and 170 cases for en-bloc resection, R0 resection, and achieving a resection speed > 9 cm 2 /hr. Fibrosis significantly affected the R0 resection rate in the regression analysis (95% confidence interval 0.21-0.55). In colonic ESD curve analysis, the learning plateau was reached after 185 cases for both en-bloc and R0 resection. Conclusions Following ex-vivo training in an animal model, an untutored expert operator achieved competency in ESD between 250 and 350 procedures. Our data can inform development of future training programs in the West.

Is there a best choice of equipment for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection?

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a widely used technique to remove early neoplastic lesions. It was primarily used in the initial days to treat gastric lesions, but recently, the horizon of this endoscopic procedure has expanded, which has allowed us to manage other technically more complex locations, such as the colorectum.

AREAS COVERED

There has been an exponential growth regarding the wide range of devices available in the market for performing colorectal ESD. As a result, the aim of this review is to highlight the indication of this endoscopic technique, which device is best suited for which indication, as well as future trajectories in this field.

EXPERT OPINION

Although some devices have proven to be more advantageous than others in this area, very often the choice is still subjective, which is commonly attributed to individual preferences and experience. However, an accurate knowledge of the available tools and their functioning, with their pros and cons, is fundamental for any endoscopist venturing into the field of third space endoscopy. In this way, one can choose which device best suits a particular situation, along with simultaneously having the wealth of knowledge related to therapeutic armamentarium at our disposal in the endoscopy suite.

Effectiveness of Strategy-Focused Training in Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Retrospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Colorectal ESD, an advanced minimally invasive treatment, presents technical challenges, with globally varying training methods. We analyzed the learning curve of ESD training, emphasizing preoperative strategies, notably gravity traction, to guide ESD instructors and trainee programs.

METHOD

This retrospective study included 881 cases guided by an experienced supervisor. Six trainees received "strategy-focused" instruction. To evaluate the number of ESD experiences in steps, the following phases were classified based on ESD experiences of each trainees: Phase 0 (0-50 ESD), Phase 1 (51-100 ESD), Phase 2 (101-150 ESD), and Phase 3 (151-200 ESD). Lesion background, outcomes, and safety were compared across phases. Factors contributing to technical difficulty in early (Phase 0 and 1) and late phases (Phase 2 and 3) were identified, along with the utility of traction ESD with device assistance.

RESULT

Treatment outcomes were favorable, with 99.8% and 94.7% en bloc resection and curative resection rates, respectively. Approximately 90% self-completion rate could be achieved after experiencing about 50 cases (92.7% in Phase 1), signifying proficiency growth despite increased case difficulty. In early phases, factors such as left-sided colon, LST-NG morphology, and severe fibrosis pose challenges. In late phases, LST-NG morphology, mild and severe fibrosis remained significant. Traction-assisted ESD, utilized in 3% of cases, comprised planned (1.1%) and rescue (1.9%) methods. Planned traction aided specific lesions, while rescue traction was common in the right colon.

CONCLUSION

"Strategy-focused" ESD training consistently yields successful outcomes, effectively adapting to varying difficulty factors in different proficient stages.

Mucin phenotype and microvessels in early gastic cancer: Magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging

Backgrounds

In order to detect early gastric cancer (EGC), this research sought to assess the diagnostic utility of magnifying endoscopy (ME) as well as the significance of mucin phenotype and microvessel features.

Methods

402 individuals with an EGC diagnosis underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) at the Department of ME between 2012 and 2020. After adjusting for image distortion, high-magnification endoscopic pictures were taken and examined to find microvessels in the area of interest. The microvessel density was measured as counts per square millimeter (counts/mm2) after segmentation, and the vascular bed's size was computed as a percentage of the area of interest. To identify certain properties of the microvessels, such as end-points, crossing points, branching sites, and connection points, further processing was done using skeletonized pixels.

Results

According to the research, undifferentiated tumors often lacked the MS pattern and showed an oval and tubular microsurface (MS) pattern, but differentiated EGC tumors usually lacked the MS pattern and presented a corkscrew MV pattern. Submucosal invasion was shown to be more strongly associated with the destructive MS pattern in differentiated tumors as opposed to undifferentiated tumors. While lesions with a corkscrew MV pattern and an antrum or body MS pattern revealed greater MUC5AC expression, lesions with a loop MV pattern indicated higher MUC2 expression. Furthermore, CD10 expression was higher in lesions with a papillary pattern and an antrum or body MS pattern.

Conclusion

These results imply that evaluating mucin phenotype and microvessel features in conjunction with magnifying endoscopy (ME) may be a useful diagnostic strategy for early gastric cancer (EGC) detection. Nevertheless, further investigation is required to confirm these findings and identify the best course of action for EGC diagnosis.