[Health insurance discount contracts: problems and risks for the general practitioner in the medical care of patients with chronic illness]

Physicians' assessment of the Bavarian drug-expenditure control system: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

In 2014 a new system for drug expenditures, the Wirkstoffvereinbarung (WSV, English: Active substance agreement) was implemented in Bavaria. In pre-defined indication groups, economic prescription of medications shall be enabled based on the selection, quantity, and proportion of an individual drug. Ambulatory care physicians receive quarterly trend reports on their prescribing behavior. This study examines physicians' perceptions of the WSV.

METHODS

Qualitative interviews (n = 20) and seven focus groups (n = 36) were conducted with ambulatory care physicians (e.g. general practitioners, cardiologists, pulmonologists). The methodology followed Qualitative Content Analysis.

RESULTS

Physicians generally accepted the necessity of prescribing economically. The majority of them rated the WSV positively and better than the previous system. As an improvement, they especially named timely feedback in form of easily understandable trend reports, encouraging self-reflection as well as allowing early control options. Problems perceived were drug discount contracts that were strongly criticized as leading to patients mixing up medications. Some perceived constraints of therapeutic freedom.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of the WSV is mostly viewed positively by physicians. The restrictions of therapeutic freedom partially perceived might be met by improved information on the reasons why some drugs are rated as less economical than others.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Main ID: DRKS00019820 (German Register of Clinical Studies and World Health Organization).

[Prescribing behavior of Bavarian general practitioners at the inpatient-outpatient interface within the context of the Bavarian active substance agreement-qualitative results of the WirtMed Study]

Hintergrund und Ziel

Zur transparenten Steuerung der Arzneimittelausgaben im Rahmen des Wirtschaftlichkeitsgebots (§ 12 Fünftes Buch Sozialgesetzbuch (SGB V)) hat die Kassenärztliche Vereinigung Bayerns im Jahr 2014 die Wirkstoffvereinbarung (WSV) eingeführt. Diese hat die Richtgrößensystematik abgelöst. Mit Bezug auf die Rolle der WSV werden im Artikel die Gründe der Hausärzt*innen (HÄ) für oder gegen eine Weiterverordnung von Arzneimitteln aus dem Krankenhaus beschrieben.

Material und Methode

In einem qualitativen Studiendesign wurden im Zeitraum 11/2019 bis 03/2020 mit bayerischen HÄ Einzelinterviews (n = 18) und 2 Fokusgruppen (n = 10) durchgeführt und nach der qualitativen Inhaltsanalyse ausgewertet.

Ergebnisse

Mit der Einführung der WSV nahmen die Regresssorgen der HÄ insgesamt ab. Große Bedeutung bei Verordnungen haben – vor der Wirtschaftlichkeit – die patient*innenorientierte Versorgung und fachliche Richtigkeit von Therapieentscheidungen. Mit der Entlassmedikation ergeben sich wirtschaftliche Herausforderungen, besonders mit dem Leitsubstanzziel der oralen Antikoagulation, den Generikazielen bei Antidiabetika und bei Therapeutika für das Herz-Kreislauf-System. Allgemein kritisiert werden Rabattverträge, die oft zu Umstellungen von Arzneimitteln führen. Vereinzelt wird von einer „Vormachtstellung“ der Klinikärzt*innen berichtet, die dem hausärztlichen wirtschaftlichen Handeln entgegenstehen. Es fehlt laut HÄ eine sektorenübergreifende Kostenverantwortung.

Diskussion

Ein reibungsloser Schnittstellenübergang ist aus Sicht der HÄ trotz des Rahmenvertrags Entlassmanagement und der neuen Steuerungssystematik der WSV im ambulanten Sektor noch nicht vorhanden. Für eine wirtschaftliche Arzneimittelversorgung bedarf es weiterhin einer sektorenübergreifenden, aber auch bundesländerübergreifenden politischen Diskussion.

Zusatzmaterial online

Im Onlinematerial sind vertiefende Informationen zu der Methodik (Onlinematerial 1: Interview- und Fokusgruppenleitfaden) sowie zur Auswertung (Onlinematerial 2: Kategoriensystem) dieser Studie (10.1007/s00103-022-03563-6) verfügbar.

Prescribing differences in family practice for diabetic patients in Germany according to statutory or private health insurance: the case of DPP-4-inhibitors and GLP-1-agonists

Background

The objective of this study was to analyze prescription decisions for family practice (FP) patients with Diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2) using the case of the incretin mimetics Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DDP-4) inhibitors and Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists dependent on patients’ health insurance status (statutory or private) in Germany. This study is important since the scientific debate is still open with regard to DPP-4-inhibitors and GLP-1-agonists, where some critics are raising questions on potential long-term risks for patients.

Methods

Data for this analysis were sourced from the German health services research register CONTENT (CONTinuous morbidity registration Epidemiologic NeTwork), in which FP health services information, generated by family practitioners, is continuously collated, e.g. patients’ health insurance status, morbidity and pharmacotherapy. Patients with Diabetes mellitus type 1 (DM1) were excluded from the study.

Results

From the family practices collaborating in the CONTENT research network, there were 7298 patients treated with pharmacotherapeutic agents for DM2 between 01.09.2009 and 31.08.2014. 586 (8.03 %) of these patients had private insurance. Prescriptions for the incretin mimetics were 40.6 % higher (9.7 vs. 6.9 %; p < 0.0001) for patients with private insurance compared to patients with statutory health insurance. This finding was confirmed with multivariable analyses.

Conclusions

There was a statistically significant difference found in prescription patterns according to the patient’s health insurance status for the incretin mimetics in this sample population of German patients with DM2. Obviously, these differences result from the eligibility for reimbursement according to patients’ health insurance status. Whether incretin mimetics pose specific long term risks for particular patients is yet to be determined.

Factors associated with medication information in diabetes care: differences in perceptions between patients and health care professionals

PURPOSE

This qualitative study in patients with type 2 diabetes and health care professionals (HCPs) aimed to investigate which factors they perceive to enhance or impede medication information provision in primary care. Similarities and differences in perspectives were explored.

METHODS

Eight semistructured focus groups were conducted, four with type 2 diabetes patients (n=25) and four with both general practitioners (n=13) and health care assistants (n=10). Sessions were audio and video recorded, transcribed verbatim, and subjected to computer-aided qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

Diabetes patients and HCPs broadly highlighted similar factors as enablers for satisfactory medication information delivery. Perceptions substantially differed regarding impeding factors. Both patients and HCPs perceived it to be essential to deliver tailored information, to have a trustful and continuous patient-provider relationship, to regularly reconcile medications, and to provide tools for medication management. However, substantial differences in perceptions related to impeding factors included the causes of inadequate information, the detail required for risk-related information, and barriers to medication reconciliation. Medication self-management was a prevalent topic among patients, whereas HCPs' focus was on fulfilling therapy and medication management responsibilities.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest a noteworthy gap in perceptions between information provision and patients' needs regarding medication-related communication. Medication safety and adherence may be improved if HCPs collaborate more closely with diabetes patients in managing their medication, in particular by incorporating the patients' perspective. Health care systems need to be structured in a way that supports this process.

The effects of rebate contracts on the health care system

Group purchasing organizations gain increasing importance with respect to the supply of pharmaceutical products and frequently use multiple, exclusive or partially exclusive rebate contracts to exercise market power. Based on a Hotelling model of horizontal and vertical product differentiation, we examine the controversy around whether a superior rebate scheme exists, as far as consumer surplus, firms' profits and total welfare are concerned. We find that firms clearly prefer partially exclusive over multiple, and multiple over exclusive rebate contracts. In contrast, no rebate form exists that lowers total costs per se for the consumers or maximizes total welfare.

Generic substitution, financial interests, and imperfect agency

Policy makers around the world seek to encourage generic substitution. In this paper, the importance of prescribing physicians' imperfect agency is tested using the fact that some Swiss jurisdictions allow physicians to dispense drugs on their own account (physician dispensing, PD) while others disallow it. We estimate a model of physician drug choice with the help of drug claim data, finding a significant positive association between PD and the use of generics. While this points to imperfect agency, generics are prescribed more often to patients with high copayments or low incomes.