[Effectiveness and risks of isolation precautions in patients with MRSA and other multidrug-resistant bacteria]

Patients with multi-drug-resistant organisms feel inadequately informed about their status: adverse effects of contact isolation

BACKGROUND

Contact isolation of patients with multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDROs) is an essential element of infection prevention strategies in hospitals worldwide. However, this practice may be associated with adverse side effects on patients' health and well-being.

AIM

This study was the first to assess mental health and well-being variables among isolated patients compared with non-isolated control patients in a German cohort.

METHODS

We conducted a matched case-control study among N = 267 patients admitted to a tertiary care teaching hospital in Germany. Their levels of anxiety, depression, loneliness, and dissatisfaction with their hospital experience were assessed using a questionnaire. Additionally, among isolated patients, it was evaluated how well they felt informed about their MDRO status.

FINDINGS

In our cohort, patients under contact isolation were significantly more dissatisfied than non-isolated control patients but did not show higher levels of anxiety, depression, and loneliness. A large proportion of patients felt insufficiently informed about their MDRO status. This lack of information was the strongest predictor of dissatisfaction among isolated patients.

CONCLUSION

These findings underline the importance of adequate patient communication. It is essential for patients' well-being to receive timely, relevant, and understandable information about the background and consequences of their infection or colonisation with MDROs.

Interprofessional perceptions of emotional, social, and ethical effects of multidrug-resistant organisms: A qualitative study

INTRODUCTION

Multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDRO) are usually managed by separating the infected patients to protect others from colonization and infection. Isolation precautions are associated with negative experiences by patients and their relatives, while hospital staff experience a heavier workload and their own emotional reactions.

METHODS

In 2018, 35 participants (nurses, physicians, pharmacists) in an antimicrobial-stewardship program participated in facilitated discussion groups working on the emotional impact of MDRO. Deductive codings were done by four coders focusing on the five basic emotions described by Paul Ekmans.

RESULTS

All five emotions revealed four to 11 codes forming several subthemes: Anger is expressed because of incompetence, workflow-impairment and lack of knowledge. Anxiety is provoked by inadequate knowledge, guilt, isolation, bad prognoses, and media-related effects. Enjoyment is seldom. Sadness is experienced in terms of helplessness and second-victim effects. Disgust is attributed to shame and bad associations, but on the other hand MDROs seem to be part of everyday life. Deductive coding yielded additional codes for bioethics and the Calgary Family Assessment Method.

CONCLUSION

MDRO are perceived to have severe impact on emotions and may affect bioethical and family psychological issues. Thus, further work should concentrate on these findings to generate a holistic view of MDRO on human life and social systems.

Interprofessional perceptions and emotional impact of multidrug-resistant organisms: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Hospital-acquired infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) are a threat to patient safety and hospital economy. Training in hygiene precautions is known to limit MDRO spread and patient morbidity. As infection prevention is a collaborative task, we developed an interprofessional educational intervention, including a reflective unit about MDRO. This article reports on the perceptions of professionals for MDRO management.

METHODS

In 2017, we conducted 8 trainings, including facilitated group discussions focusing on the question how participants think others experience MDRO. Results were analyzed using a socio-constructivist qualitative approach.

RESULTS

A total of 51 health care workers from 13 professions and 5 hospitals participated, generating 366 items for coding. Three main themes could be identified: (1) significant barriers in educating clinicians and informing lay persons, (2) emotional reactions-especially anxiety and anger-from the perspective of lay persons and professionals evoked by MDRO, and (3) perceived economic burden.

CONCLUSIONS

MDROs generate psychosocial side effects with an impact on health care management and on professional-patient relationships and interprofessional relationships. Specifically, emotions evoked by insufficient information and transparency play a major role. Therefore, hygiene trainings must not be limited to basic skills. In addition, they should be comprised of communication and educational techniques and evoke attentiveness for emotional stress.