The reconstruction of the mutilated hand

Resurfacing of a Degloved Finger With a Reverse Radial Adipofascial Forearm Flap

Complex upper-limb trauma, in particular crush and avulsion injuries, present an ongoing challenge for the reconstructive hand surgeon given the extensive zone of injury, particularly involving the neurovascular structures. When replantation is deemed unsuitable, the reconstruction must be both robust and flexible enough to meet the functional needs of the patient. The authors present a case of a ring avulsion amputation of the middle digit of a young patient’s dominant hand. Due to the distal extent of avulsion, the amputated digit was determined to be nonreplantable, and the patient’s medical comorbidities precluded traditional delayed pedicle flap options. Therefore, a reverse radial adipofascial flap was used as a single-stage reconstruction to resurface the entirety of the circumferential digital defect. At 8 months of follow up, the patient demonstrated exceptional passive and active range of motion with excellent contour and cosmesis, illustrating the utility of this reconstructive option.

[Evaluation of secondary refinement procedures following free microvascular tissue reconstruction of the upper extremity]

BACKGROUND

 The primary cosmetic and functional outcome following successful upper limb salvage using free tissue transfer can often be unfavourable, which may motivate patients to undergo secondary procedures. In this study, we sought to identify predictors for secondary procedures and to analyse the type and number of these procedures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

 Patients who underwent free tissue transfer to the upper extremity between 2010 and 2017 were included in a retrospective cohort study: patients with secondary procedures to optimise the functional and aesthetic flap design (S cohort) vs. control cohort (C cohort). A multivariate regression analysis was used to identify predictors for secondary procedures.

RESULTS

 One hundred and twenty-eight patients were included in the study (S cohort 36, C cohort 92). All in all, 56 secondary refinement procedures were performed in a mean of eight months after the initial free flap reconstruction. Most of the defects in the S cohort were localised at the hand (53 %), and upper limb salvage was mostly accomplished by fasciocutaneous and adipocutaneous free flaps (S cohort 89 %). The most frequently performed secondary refinement procedures were direct partial flap excision (61 %), followed by liposuction (16 %) and the combination of both (17 %). Furthermore, 64 % of the secondary refinement procedures from the S cohort were combined with further surgical interventions to improve hand function, e. g. tenolysis and arthrolysis. Patients with defects of the hand received secondary procedures 2.4 times more frequently (p = 0.05). Also, patients with a good general health condition (ASA 1 and 2) were six times more likely to undergo a secondary procedure (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

 Secondary procedures are safe and frequently requested by patients following successful free flap upper limb salvage. In particular, this applies to patients who are in a good health condition and with free flaps to the hand. Therefore, we recommend the implementation of secondary refinement procedures in the reconstructive plan to increase patient compliance and satisfaction.

Hand Bionic Score: a clinical follow-up study of severe hand injuries and development of a recommendation score to supply bionic prosthesis

Background

Severe hand injuries significantly limit function and esthetics of the affected hand due to massive trauma in skeletal and soft tissues. Surgical reconstruction is often unsatisfactory, so bionic prostheses are a consideration. However, assessment of functional outcomes and quality of life after surgical reconstruction to guide clinical decisions immediately after injury and in the course of treatment remain difficult.

Methods

We conducted a prospective follow-up analysis of patients with severe hand injuries during 2016–2018. We retrospectively evaluated initial trauma severity and examined current functional status, quality of life, general function, and satisfaction in everyday situations of the hand. We also developed a novel Hand Bionic Score to guide clinical recommendation for selective amputation and bionic prosthesis supply.

Results

We examined 30 patients with a mean age of 53.8 years and mean initial severity of hand injury (iHISS) of 138.4. Measures indicated moderate quality of life limitations, moderate to severe limitation of overall hand function, and slight to moderate limitation of actual hand strength and function. Mean time to follow-up examination was 3.67 years. Using the measured outcomes, we developed a Hand Bionic Score that showed good ability to differentiate patients based on outcome markers. Appropriate cutoff scores for all measured outcome markers were used to determine Hand Bionic Score classifications to guide clinical recommendation for elective amputation and bionic prosthetic supply: < 10 points, bionic hand supply not recommended; 10–14, bionic supply should be considered; or > 14, bionic supply is recommended.

Conclusions

While iHISS can guide early clinical decisions following severe hand injury, our novel Hand Bionic Score provides orientation for clinical decision-making regarding elective amputation and bionic prosthesis supply later during the course of treatment. The score not only considers hand function but also psychological outcomes and quality of life, which are important considerations for patients with severe hand injuries. However, future randomized multicenter studies are needed to validate Hand Bionic Score before further clinical application.

Level of evidence: Level III, risk/prognostic study.

Is hyperbaric oxygen therapy indispensable for saving mutilated hand injuries?

Mutilated hand injuries are a profound challenge to the plastic surgeon, and such injuries often lead to limb loss and severe functional impairment. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) appears to counteract tissue hypoxia and stimulate acute wound healing. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of HBOT as an adjunctive therapy in patients with a mutilated hand injury. Between January 2006 and December 2014, 45 patients with a mutilated hand injury were enrolled. After reconstruction or revascularisation, patients underwent 120 minutes of HBOT with oxygen at 2·5 atmospheres absolute while breathing 100% oxygen. Outcomes such as amputee survival and surgery-related complications were recorded. The patients were 38 men and 7 women with average age of 37·2 years (range 18-62). The mean defect area was 131·5 cm² (range 40-300). Most patients experienced a pure crush injury (53%). The average number of operations from the initial debridement to the first reconstruction was 3·8 (range 1-6). A total of 33 patients (73%) underwent replantation during the initial reconstruction. For flap coverage, most patients received a free flap using an anterolateral thigh flap (18 patients) or local flap using an abdomen/groin flap (nine patients). The average time from the first reconstruction or revascularisation to the first HBOT was 6·5 hours (range 2-12). The average number of HBOT sessions was 9·1 (range 6-14 sessions). The survival rate of the replanted fingers was 81%, and the survival rate of the palms was 100%. Most complications in the initial reconstruction involved partial loss of an avulsed flap, and most complications in the chronic stage (≥3 months) involved scar contracture. When combined with delicate microsurgery, early intervention using adjunctive HBOT was effective in preserving partially viable tissue and restoring hand function in patients with a mutilated hand injury.

Secondary Interventions for Mutilating Hand Injuries

Care of the reconstructed hand following mutilating injury is akin to the care of a vintage car. Its mechanisms are delicate, spare parts are limited, touch-ups are required often, and a major overhaul is indicated rarely. Secondary interventions are indicated for completion of staged primary procedures, management of complications, targeted improvement of function, and enhancement of appearance of the reconstructed hand. The approach to secondary reconstruction depends on the patient's age, and vocational and recreational requirements. It is also influenced by the constant evolution of surgeons' reconstructive philosophy, experience, and technology.

Elective amputation and bionic substitution restore functional hand use after critical soft tissue injuries

Critical soft tissue injuries may lead to a non-functional and insensate limb. In these cases standard reconstructive techniques will not suffice to provide a useful outcome, and solutions outside the biological arena must be considered and offered to these patients. We propose a concept which, after all reconstructive options have been exhausted, involves an elective amputation along with a bionic substitution, implementing an actuated prosthetic hand via a structured tech-neuro-rehabilitation program. Here, three patients are presented in whom this concept has been successfully applied after mutilating hand injuries. Clinical tests conducted before, during and after the procedure, evaluating both functional and psychometric parameters, document the benefits of this approach. Additionally, in one of the patients, we show the possibility of implementing a highly functional and natural control of an advanced prosthesis providing both proportional and simultaneous movements of the wrist and hand for completing tasks of daily living with substantially less compensatory movements compared to the traditional systems. It is concluded that the proposed procedure is a viable solution for re-gaining highly functional hand use following critical soft tissue injuries when existing surgical measures fail. Our results are clinically applicable and can be extended to institutions with similar resources.

New developments in prosthetic arm systems

Absence of an upper limb leads to severe impairments in everyday life, which can further influence the social and mental state. For these reasons, early developments in cosmetic and body-driven prostheses date some centuries ago, and they have been evolving ever since. Following the end of the Second World War, rapid developments in technology resulted in powered myoelectric hand prosthetics. In the years to come, these devices were common on the market, though they still suffered high user abandonment rates. The reasons for rejection were trifold - insufficient functionality of the hardware, fragile design, and cumbersome control. In the last decade, both academia and industry have reached major improvements concerning technical features of upper limb prosthetics and methods for their interfacing and control. Advanced robotic hands are offered by several vendors and research groups, with a variety of active and passive wrist options that can be articulated across several degrees of freedom. Nowadays, elbow joint designs include active solutions with different weight and power options. Control features are getting progressively more sophisticated, offering options for multiple sensor integration and multi-joint articulation. Latest developments in socket designs are capable of facilitating implantable and multiple surface electromyography sensors in both traditional and osseointegration-based systems. Novel surgical techniques in combination with modern, sophisticated hardware are enabling restoration of dexterous upper limb functionality. This article is aimed at reviewing the latest state of the upper limb prosthetic market, offering insights on the accompanying technologies and techniques. We also examine the capabilities and features of some of academia's flagship solutions and methods.

Neo-digit functional reconstruction of mutilating hand injury using transplantation of multiple composite tissue flaps

PURPOSE

Functional reconstruction of mutilating hand injuries poses a challenge to the surgeon. We present our experience with use of multiple composite tissue flaps transplant for functional reconstruction of hand in patients with mutilating hand injuries. The associated merits and demerits of these surgical approaches are briefly discussed.

METHODS

From August 2004 to October 2014, functional reconstruction of hand with transplantation of multiple composite tissue flaps was performed in 8 patients. These included the toe with dorsal pedis artery flap, the reverse posterior interosseous artery flap, and the anterolateral thigh flap. Mean interval from injury to functional reconstruction was 10.6 days.

RESULTS

All transplanted skin flaps and reconstructed neofingers survived completely. Only 1 patient developed wound infection at the recipient site (hand), which resolved without any debridement or revision surgery. At the donor site (foot), partial skin necrosis was observed in 1 patient, which healed with local wound care. In other patients, all wounds healed without any complications. The average range of movement at the neofinger metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joints was 38° and 73°, respectively. None of the patients required revision surgery.

CONCLUSION

Use of negative pressure wound therapy and multiple composite tissue flap transplantation appears to be an effective strategy for hand functional reconstruction in patients with mutilating hand injuries. Among the multiple composite tissue flaps, use of toe transplantation combined with reverse posterior interosseous artery flap appears to be the best option.

Novel use of a flowable collagen-glycosaminoglycan matrix (Integra™ Flowable Wound Matrix) combined with percutaneous cannula scar tissue release in treatment of post-burn malfunction of the hand--A preliminary 6 month follow-up

INTRODUCTION

Long-term function following severe burns to the hand may be poor secondary to scar adhesions to the underlying tendons, webspaces, and joints. In this pilot study, we report the feasibility of applying a pasty dermal matrix combined with percutaneous cannula teno- and adhesiolysis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this 6 month follow-up pilot study, we included eight hands in five patients with hand burns undergoing minimal-invasive, percutaneous cannula adhesiolysis and injection of INTEGRA™ Flowable Wound Matrix for a pilot study of this new concept. The flowable collagen-glycosaminoglycan wound matrix (FCGWM) was applied with a buttoned 2mm cannula to induce formation of a neo-gliding plane. Post treatment follow-up was performed to assess active range of motion (AROM), grip strength, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and quality of life Short-Form (SF)-36 questionnaire.

RESULTS

No complications were detected associated with the treatment of FCGWM injection. The mean improvement (AROM) at 6 months was 30.6° for digits 2-5. The improvement in the DASH score was a mean of 9 points out of 100. The VSS improved by a mean of 2 points out of 14.

DISCUSSION

The study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of percutaneous FCGWM for dermal augmentation after burn. Results from this pilot study show improvements in AROM for digits 2-5, functional scores from the patient's perspective (DASH) and scar quality (VSS). The flowable form of established INTEGRA™ wound matrix offers the advantage of minimal-invasive injection after scar release in the post-burned hand with a reduction in the risk of postsurgical re-scarring.

The combined ALT-groin flap for the mutilated and degloved hand

BACKGROUND

Degloving and mutilation of the hand is a rare but formidable challenge. When replantation is not possible, we rely on distant pedicled flaps. We present a technique using pedicled anterolateral thigh (ALT) and groin flaps to sandwich and resurface the degloved hand. The purpose of this study is to describe the rationale, indications, methods and outcomes of combined pedicled ALT and groin flap reconstruction of the degloved hand.

METHODS

Five injuries were treated at this center between 2011 and 2014. Charts were retrospectively reviewed and outcomes evaluated. Four ALT-groin flaps were performed in a single stage for degloving, crush and combined injuries. In one case, partial necrosis of a tight groin flap necessitated secondary ALT coverage at a second stage.

RESULTS

Flaps survived after division at 4 weeks, and venous congestion was not observed at any point. Debulking, syndactyly release and toe transfer followed reconstruction to enhance outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined ALT-groin flap is safe and feasible for the reconstruction of the degloved or mutilated hand when replantation is not an option. It is attractive for familiar donor anatomy, donor-site morbidity and the quantity and composition of the tissue it provides.

Power tool injuries to the hand and wrist

Power tool injuries to the hand and wrist are complex injuries which can have a profound impact on the function of the patient. This article gives an overview of the principles, and provides a systematic approach, to the management and rehabilitation of the injured limb and patient required to minimize future disability.

Approach to complex upper extremity injury: an algorithm

Patients with complex upper extremity injuries represent a unique subset of the trauma population. In addition to extensive soft tissue defects affecting the skin, bone, muscles and tendons, or the neurovasculature in various combinations, there is usually concomitant involvement of other body areas and organ systems with the potential for systemic compromise due to the underlying mechanism of injury and resultant sequelae. In turn, this has a direct impact on the definitive reconstructive plan. Accurate assessment and expedient treatment is thus necessary to achieve optimal surgical outcomes with the primary goal of limb salvage and functional restoration. Nonetheless, the characteristics of these injuries places such patients at an increased risk of complications ranging from limb ischemia, recalcitrant infections, failure of bony union, intractable pain, and most devastatingly, limb amputation. In this article, the authors present an algorithmic approach toward complex injuries of the upper extremity with due consideration for the various reconstructive modalities and timing of definitive wound closure for the best possible clinical outcomes.

Soft tissue coverage of the upper extremity: an overview

Prehension is a complex function of the hand that gives it mechanical precision combined with a standard sensory pattern. The priority in soft tissue reconstruction for the upper extremity is to restore function. Significant injury to the upper extremity may result after trauma because of various etiologies. The timing and choice of soft tissue coverage for upper extremity defects warrant special consideration to avoid prolonged immobilization, which can result in joint stiffness, tendon adhesions, scar contractures, and ultimately, loss of function. This article reviews the various reconstructive options and considerations involved in providing coverage for upper extremity soft tissue defects.

Free skin flap coverage of the upper extremity

Successful soft tissue reconstruction of the upper extremity must provide stable coverage and restore function to the injured hand. To ensure the best possible outcome after traumatic upper extremity injuries, early radical debridement and early flap coverage that restores all missing tissue components is critical to allow early mobilization. Free flaps provide extraordinary versatility in reconstructing defects of soft tissue, muscle, tendon, and bone.

Free muscle flaps for reconstruction of upper limb defects

Restoration of structure, function, and sensation are critical after trauma or tumor resection of the hand. Thorough debridement, reconstruction of functional structures, and immediate soft tissue coverage are most effectively performed in a single stage within approximately 24 hours of the injury. Skin flaps provide robust, pliable, and cosmetically appropriate tissue that is not prone to contracture and that facilitates secondary reconstructive work. Muscle flaps retain indications for complex defects with substantial initial contamination or dead space, or for reanimation. In this article, the indications, options, and surgical techniques for free muscle flap reconstruction of upper limb defects are reviewed.

The free fillet flap after traumatic amputation: a review of literature and case report

Severe, mutilating hand injuries present difficult reconstructive scenarios. Often in these cases, portions of the amputated tissue may be used for reconstruction of the remaining digits and hand using the spare parts principle. The free fillet flap follows the spare parts concept. A literature review of free fillet flaps for hand and forearm coverage is provided. We also present a case report of a multi-digit and dorsal hand free fillet flap for coverage of a traumatic metacarpal hand. This flap demonstrates the value of ingenuity in planning during emergent trauma reconstruction.

Open fractures of the hand with soft tissue loss

The evaluation, initial treatment, and definitive reconstruction of open fractures of the hand with associated soft tissue loss are reviewed. Specific attention is given to the literature on open fracture antibiotic prophylaxis in the hand; the timing of bone and soft tissue reconstruction; and options for soft tissue coverage, including local, regional, and distant tissue transfer. Factors that have shown association with outcomes in these injuries are also discussed, and the authors' preferred management is summarized.