Histologic diagnosis based on forceps biopsy is not adequate for determining endoscopic treatment of gastric adenomatous lesions

Gastric Cancer Incidence and Mortality After Endoscopic Resection of Gastric Adenoma: A Nationwide Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Gastric adenoma is a precursor lesion of gastric cancer. We investigated whether the removal of gastric adenoma prevented gastric cancer incidence and its mortality.

METHODS

Using the linkage of nationwide databases, we assessed gastric cancer incidence and mortality among patients who had gastric adenomas removed between 2011 and 2013 in Korea. These outcomes were compared primarily with those of the Korean general population by estimating the standardized incidence and mortality ratio and secondarily with internal control subjects who did not have gastric neoplasm after esophagogastroduodenoscopy and were matched for age, sex, and calendar year by calculating hazard ratios (HR) with the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

We identified 44,405 adenoma removal patients. During a median follow-up of 8.4 years, 1,038 (2.34%) of them were given a diagnosis of gastric cancer and a total of 524 gastric cancers were expected for a standard incidence ratio of 1.98 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.84-2.13). A total of 199 deaths from gastric cancer were expected and 99 were observed for a standard mortality ratio of 0.50 (95% CI, 0.40-0.60). Compared with the nonadenoma cohort (n = 39,826), the adenoma removal patients had a higher risk of gastric cancer (HR, 2.84; 95% CI, 2.51-3.21) and associated mortality (HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.19-2.31).

DISCUSSION

Removal of gastric adenoma resulted in lower-than-expected mortality but higher-than-expected incidence due to gastric cancer than that in the general population. Our analyses indicated the importance of follow-up strategy after removal of gastric adenoma.

Feasibility of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for endoscopic management of gastric neoplasms in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis

BACKGROUND

Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) has been developed as an effective endoscopic intervention for colon, rectum, and duodenum neoplasms. However, there are no comprehensive reports regarding the stomach, and its safety and efficacy are unknown. We aimed to examine the feasibility of UEMR for gastric neoplasms in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP).

METHODS

We retrospectively extracted data of patients with FAP who underwent endoscopic resection (ER) for gastric neoplasms at Osaka International Cancer Institute from February 2009 to December 2018. Elevated gastric neoplasms of ≤ 20 mm in diameter were extracted, and conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (CEMR) and UEMR were compared. Furthermore, outcomes after ER until March 2020 were examined.

RESULTS

91 endoscopically resected gastric neoplasms were extracted from 31 patients with 26 pedigrees, and 12 neoplasms underwent CEMR and 25 neoplasms underwent UEMR was compared. The procedure time was shorter for UEMR than for CEMR. There was no significant difference between en bloc resection and R0 resection rates by EMR methods. CEMR and UEMR showed postoperative hemorrhage rates of 8% and 0%, respectively. Residual/local recurrent neoplasms were identified in four lesions (4%), but additional endoscopic intervention (three UEMR and one cauterization) resulted in a local cure.

CONCLUSION

UEMR was feasible in gastric neoplasms of FAP patients, especially in elevated lesions and those of ≤ 20 mm in diameter.

The usefulness of image-enhanced endoscopy to distinguish gastric carcinoma in tumors initially diagnosed as adenomas by endoscopic biopsy: A retrospective study

Superficial epithelial gastric neoplasms can be divided into adenomas and early carcinomas. Histological diagnosis by endoscopic forceps biopsy is crucial for the diagnosis and management of gastric neoplasms. It is difficult to distinguish features of gastric neoplasms in small biopsy specimens; hence, gastric carcinomas can be underdiagnosed as adenomas. Recent developments in image-enhanced endoscopy have improved the ability to differentiate between carcinomatous and non-carcinomatous lesions. To investigate the prevalence of gastric carcinoma in lesions initially diagnosed as adenomas by forceps biopsy and assess the usefulness of image-enhanced endoscopy in distinguishing carcinomas. A total of 142 lesions of gastric adenomas, diagnosed by biopsy and resected endoscopically between January 2010 and May 2020, were retrospectively evaluated. Images were captured by white-light endoscopy (WLE), magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (M-NBI), and magnifying endoscopy with acetic acid and narrow-band imaging (M-AANBI); they were analyzed and compared with histopathological results. The diagnostic performance of M-AANBI was compared with that of M-NBI. Of the 142 lesions, 58 (40.8%) were pathologically diagnosed as adenocarcinomas. On WLE images, a depressed macroscopic type and size ≥20 mm were significant predictors of carcinoma (P < .001); however, they displayed low sensitivities (32.8% and 41.4%, respectively). M-AANBI displayed significantly higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for distinguishing carcinomas than M-NBI (94.8% vs 74.1%, 81.0% vs 72.6%, and 86.6% vs 73.2%, P < .05). In conclusion, carcinoma was prevalent in 40.8% of gastric lesions initially diagnosed as adenomas by forceps biopsy. M-AANBI may be more useful than M-NBI and WLE in distinguishing gastric carcinomas from adenomas.

A Prediction Model Based on the Risk Factors Associated with Pathological Upgrading in Patients with Early-Stage Gastric Neoplasms Diagnosed by Endoscopic Forceps Biopsy

Background/Aims

The discrepancies between the diagnosis of preoperative endoscopic forceps biopsy (EFB) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in patients with early gastric neoplasm (EGN) exist objectively. Among them, pathological upgrading directly influences the accuracy and appropriateness of clinical decisions. The aims of this study were to investigate the risk factors for the discrepancies, with a particular focus on pathological upgrading and to establish a prediction model for estimating the risk of pathological upgrading after EFB.

Methods

We retrospectively collected the records of 978 patients who underwent ESD from December 1, 2017 to July 31, 2021 and who had a final histopathology determination of EGN. A nomogram to predict the risk of pathological upgrading was constructed after analyzing subgroup differences among the 901 lesions enrolled.

Results

The ratio of pathological upgrading was 510 of 953 (53.5%). Clinical, laboratorial and endoscopic characteristics were analyzed using univariable and binary multivariable logistic regression analyses. A nomogram was constructed by including age, history of chronic atrophic gastritis, symptoms of digestive system, blood high density lipoprotein concentration, macroscopic type, pathological diagnosis of EFB, uneven surface, remarkable redness, and lesion size. The C-statistics were 0.804 (95% confidence interval, 0.774 to 0.834) and 0.748 (95% confidence interval, 0.664 to 0.832) in the training and validation set, respectively. We also built an online webserver based on the proposed nomogram for convenient clinical use.

Conclusions

The clinical value of identifying the preoperative diagnosis of EGN lesions is limited when using EFB separately. We have developed a nomogram that can predict the probability of pathological upgrading with good calibration and discrimination value.

Targeted labeling with tissue marking dyes guided by magnifying endoscopy of endoscopic submucosal dissection specimen improves the accuracy of endoscopic and histopathological diagnosis of early gastric cancer: a before–after study

BACKGROUND

Although histopathological evaluation after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is critical to assess the accuracy of endoscopic diagnosis, it is still challenging to perform precise endoscopic to pathological evaluation. We evaluated the importance of tissue marking dye (TMD)-targeted marking for post-ESD specimen guided by magnificent endoscope on histopathological accuracy and endoscopic-to-histopathological reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 81 specimens resected by ESD [43 without TMD marking (N-TMD group), and 38 specimens with TMD-targeted cancerous areas marking guided by post-procedural magnifying endoscopy on resected specimens (TMD group)] between January 31, 2019, and January 31, 2022 at the Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University were included in the study. The baseline characteristics of patients, discrepancies between endoscopic and histopathological diagnosis, and the impact of TMD on histopathological diagnosis and reconstruction were analyzed.

RESULTS

Discrepancies between endoscopic (pre-ESD) and histopathological (post-ESD) diagnosis increased significantly in TMD group (68.4% (26/38) for tumor areas, 26.3% (10/38) for tumor margins, and 26.3% (10/38) for tumor differentiations) when compared with N-TMD group (p < 0.0001). Deeper sections were achieved in all TMD-marked resected lesions and 27.9% (12/43) lesions in the N-TMD group (p < 0.001). More pathological evaluations in TMD group were changed from curative resection to non-curative resection [6/38(15.8%) vs 1/43(2.3%)] compared with N-TMD group (p < 0.0001). TMD-targeted marking also improved the efficiency of histopathological reconstruction on pre-procedural endoscopic images and benefit endoscopists training.

CONCLUSION

TMD-targeted labeling on resected specimens could improve precise endoscopic-to-pathological diagnosis, reconstruction by point-to-point marking and benefit endoscopists training.

Application of deep learning in the real-time diagnosis of gastric lesion based on magnifying optical enhancement videos

Background and aim

Magnifying image-enhanced endoscopy was demonstrated to have higher diagnostic accuracy than white-light endoscopy. However, differentiating early gastric cancers (EGCs) from benign lesions is difficult for beginners. We aimed to determine whether the computer-aided model for the diagnosis of gastric lesions can be applied to videos rather than still images.

Methods

A total of 719 magnifying optical enhancement images of EGCs, 1,490 optical enhancement images of the benign gastric lesions, and 1,514 images of background mucosa were retrospectively collected to train and develop a computer-aided diagnostic model. Subsequently, 101 video segments and 671 independent images were used for validation, and error frames were labeled to retrain the model. Finally, a total of 117 unaltered full-length videos were utilized to test the model and compared with those diagnostic results made by independent endoscopists.

Results

Except for atrophy combined with intestinal metaplasia (IM) and low-grade neoplasia, the diagnostic accuracy was 0.90 (85/94). The sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, and overall accuracy of the model to distinguish EGC from non-cancerous lesions were 0.91 (48/53), 0.78 (50/64), 4.14, 0.12, and 0.84 (98/117), respectively. No significant difference was observed in the overall diagnostic accuracy between the computer-aided model and experts. A good level of kappa values was found between the model and experts, which meant that the kappa value was 0.63.

Conclusions

The performance of the computer-aided model for the diagnosis of EGC is comparable to that of experts. Magnifying the optical enhancement model alone may not be able to deal with all lesions in the stomach, especially when near the focus on severe atrophy with IM. These results warrant further validation in prospective studies with more patients. A ClinicalTrials.gov registration was obtained (identifier number: NCT04563416).

Clinical Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04563416.

Endoscopic or Follow-up Treatment for Gastric Indeterminate Tumors Is the Preferred Method of Management

Background

Endoscopic forceps biopsy (EFB) lacks precision in diagnosing indeterminate tumors. When the presence of early gastric cancer (EGC) is macroscopically suspected, but biopsy pathology fails to give a diagnosis of neoplasia, it causes problems in clinical management. The purpose of this study was to discuss the outcome of gastric indeterminate tumors and the clinical factors associated with predicting EGC.

Methods

The medical records of 209 patients diagnosed with gastric indeterminate neoplasia by biopsy forceps were retrospectively studied. Initial endoscopic findings were analyzed and predictors of EGC were evaluated.

Results

The final pathological diagnosis in 209 patients included adenocarcinoma (n = 7), high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (n = 11), low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (n = 21), and non-neoplastic lesion (n = 170). Multivariate analysis showed that older age (OR = 1.78; 95% CI = 1.17–2.71; p = 0.008), patients undergoing narrow band imaging (NBI) (OR = 3.40; 95% CI = 1.37–8.43; p = 0.008), and surface erosion (OR = 3.53; 95% CI = 1.41–8.84; p = 0.007) were associated with the upgraded group, and were significantly associated with risk. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that among patients with NBI, the presence of demarcation line (DL) (OR = 24.00; 95% CI = 4.99–115.36; p < 0.0001), microvascular (MV) pattern irregularity (OR = 9.129; 95% CI = 2.36–35.34; p = 0.001), and the presence of white opaque substance (WOS) (OR = 10.77; 95% CI = 1.14–101.72; p = 0.038) were significant risk factors.

Conclusions

For gastric indeterminate tumors, older patient age, lesion surface with erosion, clear DL visible under NBI observation, presence of WOS, and irregular MV pattern are suggestive of the high possibility of neoplasia and need to be focused on and may benefit more from endoscopic resection treatment as opposed to simple endoscopic follow-up.

Potential Factors Predicting Histopathologically Upgrade Discrepancies between Endoscopic Forceps Biopsy of the Colorectal Low-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Endoscopic Resection Specimens

Background

It was gradually accepted that endoscopic fragment biopsy (EFB) diagnosis cannot accurately guarantee the absence of higher-grade neoplasms within the lesion of the digestive tract. There are no well-established predictors for histopathologically upgrade discrepancies between EFB diagnosing colorectal low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN) and endoscopic resection (ER) specimens.

Methods

A total of 918 colorectal LGINs was histopathologically diagnosed by EFB, including 162 cases with upgrade discrepancy and 756 concordant cases. We compared clinicopathological data of EFB and ER specimens between these two groups. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors for this upgrade histopathology.

Results

The predominant upgrade discrepancy of LGINs diagnosed by EFB was upgrades to high-grade dysplasia (114/918, 12.4%), followed by upgrades to intramucosal carcinoma (33/918, 3.6%), submucosal adenocarcinoma (10/918, 1.1%), and advanced adenocarcinoma (5/918, 0.5%). NSAID history (OR 4.83; 95% CI, 2.27-10.27; p < 0.001), insufficient EFB number (OR 2.99; 95% CI, 1.91-4.68; p < 0.001), maximum diameter ≥ 1.0 cm (OR 6.18; 95% CI, 1.32-28.99; p = 0.021), lobulated shape (OR 2.68; 95% CI, 1.65-4.36; p < 0.001), erythema (OR 2.42; 95% CI, 1.50-3.91; p < 0.001), erosion (OR 7.12; 95% CI, 3.91-12.94; p < 0.001), surface unevenness (OR 2.31; 95% CI, 1.33-4.01; p = 0.003), and distal location of the target adenoma (OR 3.29; 95% CI, 1.68-6.41; p < 0.001) were associated with the histologically upgrade discrepancies.

Conclusion

NSAID history, insufficient EFB number, adenoma size and location, and abnormal macroscopic patterns are potential predictors for upgrade histopathology of LGINs diagnosed by EFBs. The standardization of EFB number and advanced imaging techniques could minimize the risk of neglecting the potential of this upgrade histopathology.

Discrepancy Between Forceps Biopsy and Resection in Colorectal Polyps: A 1686 Paired Screening-Therapeutic Colonoscopic Finding

Purpose

To identify pathology discrepancy between forceps biopsies and polypectomy specimens in colorectal polyps, as well as the reliability of biopsy-based treatment strategy.

Methods

All endoscopic polypectomy cases with forceps biopsies performed within 6 months were included in the study. The biopsies were compared with polypectomy specimens in terms of concordance of histological diagnosis. A logistic regression model was used to investigate the independent predictors of upgrade in histological diagnosis compared with concordance in histological diagnosis.

Results

A total of 1686 paired screening-therapeutic colonoscopies and 1739 paired biopsy-polypectomy specimens were enrolled in the study. The grade of dysplasia in 84.5% of biopsy specimens were concordant to polypectomy specimens, but this proportion decreased to 75.4% when the specimens were classified using tubular or villousness structure. 10.1% and 5.4% of biopsy specimens were upgraded and downgraded in assessing grade of dysplasia, respectively, while 14.3% and 10.3% of biopsy specimens were upgraded and downgraded in assessing tubular or villousness structure, respectively. In subgroup analysis stratified by size of polyps, 9.0% and 10.6% of biopsies obtained from polyps smaller than 10 mm were upgraded in assessing dysplasia and tubular or villousness structure, respectively. This proportion increased to 10.7% and 21.3%, respectively, in biopsies obtained from polyps larger than 10 mm. Larger size of polyps and pedunculated polyps were associated with a higher incidence of upgrade in histological diagnosis. Nearly 25% of biopsy specimens with high-grade dysplasia were identified as adenocarcinoma in polypectomy specimens.

Conclusion

The concordance between biopsy and polypectomy specimens is not adequate. The biopsy-based treatment strategy is not reliable and should not be considered as an indicator for further treatment, particularly in large or pedunculated polyps.

Single operator experience of endoscopic submucosal dissection for Barrett's neoplasia in a North American academic center

OBJECTIVES

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is carving out an increasing role in the treatment of Barrett's associated neoplasia. ESD provides the advantage of en-bloc resections and greater R0 resection rates. We aim to present outcomes from one of the largest single-center cohorts of esophageal ESD in North America.

METHODS

All patients undergoing esophageal ESD for Barrett's neoplasia between Oct 2016 and June 2020 at a Canadian tertiary care center were included. Demographic, procedural data, and lesion characteristics are presented. Subgroup analysis was performed on patients who underwent extensive resection (≥75% of esophageal circumference) and the patients who developed strictures.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were included in the series. The median lesion diameter was 5.7 cm and the median procedure time was 129 min. The en-bloc resection rate was 97%, and the R0 resection rate was 91%. Curative resection was achieved in 82% of patients. Upstaging in histology occurred in 59% of cases. Two adverse events occurred, and there were no perforations. Procedural outcomes were similar in patients with extensive resections, but those with ≥75% circumferential resection developed more strictures (65% vs. 6.3%, p < 0.01). Stricture formation was associated with extensive resection (odds ratio [OR]: 27.5, p < 0.01) and longer lesion diameter (OR: 1.7, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Our experience with ESD for Barrett's related neoplasia shows excellent en-bloc and R0 resection rate, and provides more accurate histological specimens. Curative resection is possible in the majority of cases, including those with extensive resections. Further investigation into stricture prophylaxis will be useful as near circumferential resections are attempted.

Gastric neoplasms in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: endoscopic and clinicopathologic features

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Gastric neoplasms in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) occur at a high rate and can cause death. The endoscopic findings of gastric neoplasms in these patients are characteristic but not well recognized. To identify the relevant characteristics to enable early detection, we retrospectively investigated endoscopic findings of gastric neoplasms in patients with FAP and then compared the clinical, histopathologic, and genetic features among subgroups.

METHODS

Of 234 patients with 171 pedigrees at 2 institutes, 56 cases (24%, 133 gastric neoplasms) with 44 pedigrees were examined. Immunostaining was performed for histopathologic evaluation by 1 blinded pathologist. According to the endoscopic findings, gastric neoplasms were divided into 4 types based on location (L: antrum and pylorus, UM: the rest of the stomach) and color (W: white, T: translucent, R: reddish) and their clinicopathologic features examined.

RESULTS

Of the cases, 93% could be classified into a single type. Among histologic phenotypes, high-grade dysplasia was present in 26% (type L), 41% (type UM-W), 0% (type UM-T), and 22% (type UM-R). The immunologic phenotype comprised the gastric type in 69% (93% in Type UM) and the intestinal phenotype, including the mixed type, in 31% (61% in type L). Moreover, 96% of patients had concurrent duodenal neoplasms. Adenomatous polyposis coli gene status was identified in 93% of patients; the pathogenic variant was detected in 98% but did not influence any endoscopic features.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric neoplasms in patients with FAP were stratified into 4 types according to their endoscopic findings. The endoscopic phenotype was related to the histopathologic phenotype but not to germline variants.

Risk factor-based optimal endoscopic surveillance intervals after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric adenoma

To date, there exists no established endoscopic surveillance interval strategy after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric adenoma. In this study, we suggest a risk factor-based statistical model for optimal surveillance intervals for gastric adenoma after ESD with curative resection. A cox proportional hazard model was applied to identify risk factors for recurrence after ESD. Patients (n = 698) were categorized into groups based on the identified risk factors. The cumulative density of recurrence over time was computed using a cubic splined baseline hazard function, and the customized surveillance interval was modeled for each risk group. The overall cumulative incidence of recurrence was 7.3% (n = 51). Risk factors associated with recurrence were male (hazard ratio [HR], 2.60, P = 0.030), protruded scar (HR, 3.18, P < 0.001), and age ≥ 59 years (HR, 1.05, P < 0.001). The surveillance interval for each group was developed by using the recurrence limit for the generated risk groups. According to the developed schedule, high-risk patients would have a maximum of seven surveillance visits for 5 years, whereas low-risk patients would have biennial surveillance for cancer screening. We proposed a simple and promising strategy for determining a better endoscopic surveillance interval by parameterizing diverse and group-specific recurrence risk factors into a well-known survival model.

Risk stratification of patients with gastric lesions indefinite for dysplasia

BACKGROUND/AIMS

There are no definite guidelines for the management of gastric lesions diagnosed as indefinite for dysplasia (IND) by endoscopic forceps biopsy (EFB). Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of gastric IND and predictive factors for gastric neoplasm.

METHODS

This study included 457 patients with a first diagnosis of gastric IND by EFB between January 2005 and December 2013. Patient characteristics and endoscopic and pathological data were reviewed and compared.

RESULTS

Of the 457 gastric IND patients, 128 (28%) were diagnosed with invasive carcinoma, 21 (4.6%) with high-grade dysplasia, 31 (6.8%) with low-grade dysplasia, and 277 (60.6%) as negative for dysplasia. Of lesions observed, 180 (39.4%) showed upgraded histology. Multivariate analysis revealed that surface erythema (odds ratio [OR], 2.804; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.741 to 4.516), spontaneous bleeding (OR, 2.618; 95% CI, 1.298 to 5.279), lesion size ≥ 1 cm (OR, 5.762; 95% CI, 3.459 to 9.597), and depressed morphology (OR, 2.183; 95% CI, 1.155 to 4.124) were significant risk factors for high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma. The ORs associated with 2 and ≥ 3 risk factors were 7.131 and 34.86, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Precautions should be taken in the management of gastric IND patients, especially when risk factors, including surface erythema, spontaneous bleeding, lesion size ≥ 1 cm, and depressed morphology are present. Considering the combined effect of the presence of multiple risk factors on the incidence of high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma, endoscopic resection should be recommended if a gastric IND patient has at two or more of these factors.

Clinical Outcomes of Endoscopic Resection for Low-Grade Dysplasia and High-Grade Dysplasia on Gastric Pretreatment Biopsy: Korea ESD Study Group

Background/Aims

Some cases of gastric low-grade dysplasia (LGD) and high-grade dysplasia (HGD) on forceps biopsy (FB) are diagnosed as gastric cancer (GC) after endoscopic resection (ER). This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of ER for gastric LGD and HGD on pretreatment FB and to identify the factors that predict pathologic upstaging to GC.

Methods

Patients who underwent ER for LGD and HGD on pretreatment FB from March 2005 to February 2018 in 14 hospitals in South Korea were enrolled, and the patients’ medical records were reviewed retrospectively.

Results

This study included 2,150 cases of LGD and 1,534 cases of HGD diagnosed by pretreatment FB. In total, 589 of 2,150 LGDs (27.4%) were diagnosed as GC after ER. Helicobacterpylori infection, smoking history, tumor location in the lower third of the stomach, tumor size >10 mm, depressed lesion, and ulceration significantly predicted GC. A total of 1,115 out of 1,534 HGDs (72.7%) were diagnosed with GC after ER. Previous history of GC, H. pylori infection, smoking history, tumor location in the lower third of the stomach, tumor size >10 mm, depressed lesion, and ulceration were significantly associated with GC. As the number of risk factors predicting GC increased in both LGD and HGD on pretreatment FB, the rate of upstaging to GC after ER increased.

Conclusions

A substantial proportion of LGDs and HGDs on pretreatment FB were diagnosed as GC after ER. Accurate ER procedures such as endoscopic submucosal dissection should be recommended in cases of LGD and HGD with factors predicting pathologic upstaging to GC.

Helicobacter Infection and Gastric Adenoma

Background: We aimed to provide insight into the actual frequencies of gastric adenoma types and their association with gastritis status and associated mucosal changes with a focus on Helicobacter infection and the operative link on gastritis assessment (OLGA)/operative link on gastric intestinal metaplasia assessment (OLGIM) staging. Methods: From the archive of the Institute of Pathology in Bayreuth, we collected a consecutive series of 1058 gastric adenomas diagnosed between 1987 and 2017. Clinicopathological parameters retrieved from diagnostic reports included adenoma type and localization, associated mucosal changes in antrum and corpus (i.e., type of gastritis, the extent of intestinal metaplasia and atrophy), gender, date of birth, and date of diagnosis. Results: Intestinal-type adenoma was the most frequent adenoma (89.1%), followed by foveolar-type adenoma (4.3%), pyloric gland adenoma (3.4%), adenomas associated with hereditary tumor syndromes (2.8%), and oxyntic gland adenoma (0.4%). Adenomas were found in the background of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) gastritis in 23.9%, Ex-H. pylori gastritis in 36.0%, autoimmune gastritis in 24.8%, chemical reactive gastritis in 7.4%, and others in 0.1%. More than 70% of patients with gastric adenomas had low-risk stages in OLGA and OLGIM. Conclusions: We found a higher frequency of foveolar-type adenoma than anticipated from the literature. It needs to be questioned whether OLGA/OLGIM staging can be applied to all patients.

Increased incidence of metachronous gastric neoplasm after endoscopic resection in patients with synchronous gastric neoplasm

Background

Recurrence risk is a major concern after endoscopic resection (ER) of gastric neoplasms. This study was to compare metachronous risk in patients with and without synchronous neoplasms after complete ER.

Methods

After ER for gastric neoplasms, patients were divided into those with and without synchronous neoplasm. The metachronous risk of gastric neoplasms was compared between the two groups.

Results

After ER of 678 cancers and 891 adenomas, synchronous neoplasm was found in 11.8% of cancers and 11.4% of adenomas. In the multiple (n = 182) and the single group (n = 1387), metachronous neoplasms occurred in 18.1 and 8.6%, respectively (HR 2.40; 95% CI, 1.62–3.34). When the pathology of the recurred lesion was limited to cancer, metachronous risk was also significantly higher in the multiple than in the single group (HR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.17–3.85). In the recurred pathology of the multiple group, cancer development was frequently observed in patients with cancer compared to those with only adenomas in the synchronous lesion (67.0% vs. 13.0%, respectively; P = 0.023).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that metachronous risk was significantly higher in patients with synchronous gastric neoplasms after ER. Therefore, meticulous examination is important in patients with synchronous neoplasm.

Predictive Model of Nonneoplastic Pathology after Endoscopic Resection of Gastric Epithelial Neoplasia

Background/Aims

The rate of nonneoplastic pathology (NNP) after endoscopic resection (ER) of gastric epithelial neoplasia (GEN) has been reported to be 3%–7%. However, to date, the associations of pretreatment characteristics with NNP have not been identified. The aim of this study was to develop a predictive model for NNP after ER.

Methods

Among 817 patients who underwent ER for GEN, factors associated with NNP were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. Weighted points considering the β coefficient were allocated to each variable that was significant in the multivariate analysis. The predictive score was calculated by the total points. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was calculated for the predictive score.

Results

The rate of NNP was 8.8%. After multivariate analysis, poor demarcation from the background, no ulceration, a flat appearance, and low-grade dysplasia were significant factors predictive of NNP. One point each was allocated for no ulcer, flat appearance, and low-grade dysplasia. Two points were allocated for poor demarcation from the background. The predictive score ranged from 0 to 5 points. Patients were categorized as being at low risk (0, 1, or 2 points) or high risk (3, 4, or 5 points) for NNP. The AUROC was 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.77 to 0.88; p<0.01). With a cutoff value of 2.5, the sensitivity and specificity of the score for predicting NNP were 0.72 and 0.84, respectively.

Conclusions

We developed a model to predict NNP after ER. Endoscopic re-biopsy or re-evaluation by pathologists is strongly recommended for the high-risk group.

Long-term outcomes of patients with gastric adenoma in Korea: A retrospective observational study

New endoscopic resection techniques are constantly being developed for gastric adenoma, which can be classified as low or high grade according to the Vienna classification. However, long-term data on gastric adenoma (e.g., removal or follow-up after resection via endoscopy) remain lacking.We retrospectively analyzed 133 cases with gastric adenoma that underwent endoscopic resection from January 2010 to November 2018. We analyzed the risk factors and frequency of patients with synchronous and metachronous lesions after endoscopic resection for gastric adenoma and followed them for more than 2 years.One hundred six (79.7%) and 27 patients (20.3%) received endoscopic resection (ER) once and more than twice, respectively. Compared with the initial endoscopic biopsy pathological results, the upgraded and downgraded histological discrepancy rates were 10.5% (n = 14) and 3.0% (n = 4) after resection, respectively. The mean time to synchronous/metachronous recurrence was 2.23 years. The average lesion size at first procedure was larger in the multiple ER group than in the single ER group (2.00 vs 1.10 cm; P = .040). Eleven (8.3%) and 16 patients (12.0%) had recurred synchronous and metachronous lesions, respectively. In the multivariate Cox analysis of the recurrence group, intestinal metaplasia (hazard ratio, 2.761; 95% confidence interval, 1.117-6.820; P = .028) and lesion size (hazard ratio, 1.607; 95% confidence interval, 1.082-2.385; P = .019) were independent factors for receiving endoscopic resection more than twice.If patients have severe intestinal metaplasia or large size of lesion at endoscopic resection for gastric adenoma, periodic observation is necessary.

British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the diagnosis and management of patients at risk of gastric adenocarcinoma

Gastric adenocarcinoma carries a poor prognosis, in part due to the late stage of diagnosis. Risk factors include Helicobacter pylori infection, family history of gastric cancer-in particular, hereditary diffuse gastric cancer and pernicious anaemia. The stages in the progression to cancer include chronic gastritis, gastric atrophy (GA), gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) and dysplasia. The key to early detection of cancer and improved survival is to non-invasively identify those at risk before endoscopy. However, although biomarkers may help in the detection of patients with chronic atrophic gastritis, there is insufficient evidence to support their use for population screening. High-quality endoscopy with full mucosal visualisation is an important part of improving early detection. Image-enhanced endoscopy combined with biopsy sampling for histopathology is the best approach to detect and accurately risk-stratify GA and GIM. Biopsies following the Sydney protocol from the antrum, incisura, lesser and greater curvature allow both diagnostic confirmation and risk stratification for progression to cancer. Ideally biopsies should be directed to areas of GA or GIM visualised by high-quality endoscopy. There is insufficient evidence to support screening in a low-risk population (undergoing routine diagnostic oesophagogastroduodenoscopy) such as the UK, but endoscopic surveillance every 3 years should be offered to patients with extensive GA or GIM. Endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection of visible gastric dysplasia and early cancer has been shown to be efficacious with a high success rate and low rate of recurrence, providing that specific quality criteria are met.

Forceps Biopsies Are Not Reliable in the Workup of Large Colorectal Lesions Referred for Endoscopic Resection: Should They Be Abandoned?

BACKGROUND

Biopsies are routinely obtained in the workup of large colorectal polyps before endoscopic resection.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine how reliable biopsies are in terms of reflecting the true histopathology of large colorectal polyps, in the clinical routine.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective study.

SETTINGS

Data from patients undergoing polypectomy of large colorectal polyps at the endoscopy unit, Skåne University Hospital Malmö, between January 2014 and December 2016 were scrutinized.

PATIENTS

A total of 485 colorectal lesions were biopsied within 1 year before complete endoscopic removal. Biopsy-obtained specimens were compared with completely resected specimens in terms of concordance and discordance and if the final result was upgraded or downgraded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measured was the concordance between biopsy-obtained specimens and completely resected specimens.

RESULTS

Median lesion size was 3 cm (range 1-11). In 189 cases (39%), biopsies did not provide a correct dysplastic grade compared with final pathology after complete resection. One hundred forty-three cases (29%) and 46 cases (9%) were upgraded and downgraded. The percentage of cases with discordant biopsy results was 40% in cases with 1 biopsy taken and 38% in cases where multiple biopsies had been sampled. Time from biopsy to complete resection did not influence the erroneous outcome of biopsies. Notably, the percentage of discordant biopsy results was 37% and 35% in lesions measuring 1 to 2 cm and 2 to 4 cm. However, this percentage increased to 48% in colorectal lesions larger than 4 cm.

LIMITATIONS

This study was designed to reflect the clinical routine, the number of biopsies obtained and forceps technique were hence not standardized, which constitutes a limitation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that cancer-negative forceps biopsies of large colorectal polyps, referred for endoscopic resection, are not reliable. Considering that endoscopic resection of lesions containing superficial cancer is plausible, the clinical value of forceps biopsies in lesions suitable for endoscopic resection is questionable. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A984. LAS BIOPSIAS CON FÓRCEPS NO SON CONFIABLES EN EL ESTUDIO DE LAS LESIONES COLORRECTALES GRANDES REFERIDAS PARA RESECCIÓN ENDOSCÓPICA: ¿DEBERÍAN ABANDONARSE?: Las biopsias se obtienen de forma rutinaria en el estudio de pólipos colorrectales grandes previo a resección endoscópica.

OBJETIVO

Analizar que tan confiables son las biopsias en cuanto a reflejar la verdadera histopatología de los pólipos colorrectales grandes, en la rutina clínica. DISEÑO:: Este es un estudio retrospectivo.

AJUSTES

Los datos de pacientes sometidos a polipectomía de pólipos colorrectales grandes en la unidad de endoscopia, en Skåne University Hospital Malmö, entre enero de 2014 y diciembre de 2016 fueron examinados.

PACIENTES

Un total de 485 lesiones colorrectales se biopsiaron dentro de un año antes de la resección endoscópica completa. Las muestras obtenidas mediante biopsia se compararon con las muestras completas resecadas en términos de concordancia y discordancia, y si el resultado final ascendió o disminuyó de categoría.

PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO

Concordancia entre muestras obtenidas mediante biopsia y muestras completamente resecadas.

RESULTADOS

La mediana de tamaño de lesiones fue de 3 cm (rango 1-11). En 189 casos (39%) las biopsias no proporcionaron un grado de displasia correcto en comparación con la patología final después de la resección completa. 143 casos (29%) y 46 casos (9%) ascendieron y descendieron de categoría, respectivamente. El porcentaje de casos con resultados de biopsia discordantes fue del 40% en los casos con una sola biopsia tomada y del 38% en los casos en los que se tomaron múltiples biopsias. El tiempo desde la biopsia hasta la resección completa no influyó en el resultado erróneo de las biopsias. Notablemente, el porcentaje de resultados de biopsia discordantes fue de 37% y 35% en lesiones que midieron 1-2 cm y 2-4 cm, respectivamente. Sin embargo, este porcentaje aumentó a 48% en lesiones colorrectales mayores de 4 cm.

LIMITACIONES

Este estudio se diseñó para reflejar la rutina clínica, el número de biopsias obtenidas y la técnica de fórceps no fueron estandarizadas, lo que constituye una limitación.

CONCLUSIONES

Este estudio demuestra que las biopsias con fórceps negativas a cáncer, de pólipos colorrectales grandes referidas para resección endoscópica, no son confiables. Teniendo en cuenta que la resección endoscópica de lesiones que contienen cáncer superficial es posible, el valor clínico de las biopsias con fórceps en lesiones aptas para la resección endoscópica es cuestionable. Vea el Resumen en video en http://links.lww.com/DCR/A984.

Histopathologic discrepancies between endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic resection specimens in superficial esophageal squamous neoplasms

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Endoscopic forceps biopsy results that reflect the final pathologic results of an entire lesion are essential for making accurate diagnoses and appropriate therapeutic decisions for patients with superficial esophageal squamous neoplasms (SESNs). This study investigated the histopathologic discrepancies between endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic resection specimens to elucidate the factors contributing to such discrepancies.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study involved 77 patients (84 lesions) who underwent endoscopic resections for SESNs, between January 2005 and August 2017, at the Pusan National University Hospital. The SESNs were classified as low-grade intraepithelial neoplasms (LGINs), high-grade intraepithelial neoplasms (HGINs), or squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs). Following slide reviews, the histopathologic concordance between endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic resection specimens was assessed, in each case.

RESULTS

The histopathologic discrepancy rate between the endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic resection specimens was 34.5% (29/84 lesions). Among the 29 diagnostically discordant lesions, upgrades and downgrades of the histopathologic diagnoses occurred for 27 and 2 lesions, respectively. The predominant discrepancies results in lesion upgrades from HGIN to SCC (n = 21) and from LGIN to SCC (n = 5). The two downgraded cases included one from SCC to HGIN and one from HGIN to LGIN. Multivariate analyses identified two factors that were significantly associated with the histopathologic discrepancies: upper esophageal location (odds ratio, 7.743; 95% confidence interval, 1.031-58.174; P = 0.047) and tumor area per biopsy ≥ 158.6 mm² /biopsy (odds ratio, 5.933; 95% confidence interval, 1.051-44.483; P = 0.044).

CONCLUSION

Histopathologic discrepancies were observed between endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic resection specimens in patients with SESNs. Tumor location and tumor area/biopsy were both significantly associated with the discrepancies.

A robust qualitative transcriptional signature for the correct pathological diagnosis of gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Currently, pathological examination of gastroscopy biopsy specimens is the gold standard for gastric cancer (GC) diagnosis. However, it has a false-negative rate of 10-20% due to inaccurate sampling locations and/or insufficient sampling amount. A signature should be developed to aid the early diagnosis of GC using biopsy specimens even when they are sampled from inaccurate locations.

METHODS

We extracted a robust qualitative transcriptional signature, based on the within-sample relative expression orderings (REOs) of gene pairs, to discriminate both GC tissues and adjacent-normal tissues from non-GC gastritis, intestinal metaplasia and normal gastric tissues.

RESULTS

A signature consisting of two gene pairs for GC diagnosis was identified and validated in data of both biopsy specimens and surgical resection specimens pooled from publicly available datasets measured by different laboratories with different platforms. For gastroscopy biopsy specimens, 96.20% of 79 non-GC tissues were correctly identified as non-GC, and 96.84% of 158 GC tissues and six of seven adjacent-normal tissues were correctly identified as GC. For surgical resection specimens, 98.37% of 2560 GC tissues and 97.28% of 221 adjacent-normal tissues were correctly identified as GC. Especially, 97.67% of the 257 GC patients at stage I were exactly diagnosed as GC. We additionally measured 21 GC tissues from seven different GC patients, each with three specimens sampled from three tumor locations with different proportions of the tumor epithelial cell. All these GC tissues were correctly identified as GC, even when the proportion of the tumor epithelial cell was as low as 14%.

CONCLUSIONS

The qualitative transcriptional signature can distinguish both GC and adjacent-normal tissues from normal, gastritis and intestinal metaplasia tissues of non-GC patients even using inaccurately sampled biopsy specimens, which can be applied robustly at the individual level to aid the early GC diagnosis.

Treatment for gastric ‘indefinite for neoplasm/dysplasia’ lesions based on predictive factors

BACKGROUND

Gastric ‘indefinite for neoplasm/dysplasia’ (IFND) is a borderline lesion that is difficult to diagnose as either regenerative or neoplastic. There is a need for guidance in the identification of a subset of patients, who have an IFND lesion with a higher risk of malignant potential, to enable risk stratification and optimal management.

AIM

To determine the clinical and pathologic factors for the accurate diagnosis of gastric IFND lesions.

METHODS

In total, 461 gastric lesions diagnosed via biopsy as IFND lesions were retrospectively evaluated. Endoscopic resection (n = 134), surgery (n = 22), and follow-up endoscopic biopsy (n = 305) were performed to confirm the diagnosis. The time interval from initial biopsy to cancer diagnosis was measured, and diagnostic delays were categorized as > 2 wk, > 2 mo, > 6 mo, and > 1 year. The IFND lesions presenting as regenerating atypia (60%) or atypical epithelia (40%) at initial biopsy were adenocarcinomas in 22.6%, adenomas in 8.9%, and gastritis in 68.5% of the cases.

RESULTS

Four clinical factors [age ≥ 60 years (2.445, 95%CI: 1.305-4.580, P = 0.005), endoscopic size ≥ 10 mm (3.519, 95%CI: 1.891-6.548, P < 0.001), single lesion (5.702, 95%CI: 2.212-14.696, P < 0.001), and spontaneous bleeding (4.056, 95%CI: 1.792-9.180, P = 0.001)], and two pathologic factors [atypical epithelium (25.575, 95%CI: 11.537-56.695, P < 0.001], and repeated IFND diagnosis [6.022, 95%CI: 1.822-19.909, P = 0.003)] were independent risk factors for gastric cancer. With two or more clinical factors, the sensitivity and specificity for carcinoma were 91.3% and 54.9%, respectively. Ten undifferentiated carcinomas were initially diagnosed as IFND. In the subgroup analysis, fold change (5.594, 95%CI: 1.458-21.462, P = 0.012) predicted undifferentiated or invasive carcinoma in the submucosal layers or deeper. Diagnostic delays shorter than 1 year were not associated with worse prognoses. Extremely well-differentiated adenocarcinomas accounted for half of the repeated IFND cases and resulted in low diagnostic accuracy even on retrospective blinded review.

CONCLUSION

More than two clinical and pathologic factors each had significant cut-off values for gastric carcinoma diagnosis; in such cases, endoscopic resection should be considered.

Analysis of endoscopic features for histologic discrepancies between biopsy and endoscopic submucosal dissection in gastric neoplasms: 10-year results

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The histologic discrepancies between preoperative endoscopic forceps biopsy (EFB) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) specimens sometimes confuse the endoscope operator. This study aimed to analyze the limitation of the biopsy-based diagnosis before ESD and to evaluate which factors affect the discordant pathologic results between EFB and ESD.

METHODS

A total of 1427 patients, who were diagnosed with gastric adenoma by EFB, were enrolled. Cancer confirmed on EFB was excluded (n = 513). We retrospectively reviewed cases and compared histologic diagnoses in the biopsy sample with the final diagnosis in the endoscopically resected specimen.

RESULTS

The diagnosis was upgraded (from low-grade dysplasia to high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma, or from high-grade dysplasia to adenocarcinoma) in 328 cases (23.0%), concordant in 944 (66.1%), and downgraded (from high-grade dysplasia to low-grade dysplasia or non-neoplasia, or from low-grade dysplasia to non-neoplasia) in 155 (10.9%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that surface ulceration and depressed lesions were associated with significant risk factors for upgrading. Age younger than 60 years and size <1 cm were associated with significant factors for downgrading.

CONCLUSIONS

Careful endoscopic observation should consider size, ulceration, and depression to ensure accurate diagnosis when a gastric neoplasm is suspected.

Incidence of gastric adenocarcinoma among lesions diagnosed as low-grade adenoma/dysplasia on endoscopic biopsy: A multicenter, prospective, observational study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Differentiation between gastric adenocarcinoma and low-grade adenoma/dysplasia (LGA) on endoscopic forceps biopsy is difficult. We aim to clarify the incidence of carcinoma in specimens, obtained by endoscopic resection (ER), from cases that had been diagnosed as LGA (Vienna category 3) on endoscopic biopsy.

METHODS

In this multicenter, prospective, observational study, patients with gastric adenoma (Vienna category 3 or 4.1) diagnosed on endoscopic forceps biopsy were enrolled. All the specimens were subjected to histopathological central review. Primary endpoint was the incidence of carcinoma (Vienna category 4.2 or over) among the biopsy-proven gastric LGA. Secondary endpoints were the histological findings of resected specimens, clinicopathological features of carcinoma, and short-term outcomes of all ER cases.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients with 104 lesions diagnosed as gastric adenoma were enrolled. After central review of the biopsy specimens, 47 lesions were diagnosed as LGA and seven lesions (15%) as adenocarcinoma (95% confidence interval, 7.6-28%). Carcinoma was detected in lesions that had a minimum size of 6 mm; the incidence of carcinoma was higher in the larger lesions. There was a histological discrepancy between biopsy and ER material in more than 60% of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial proportion of biopsy-proven gastric LGA specimens were diagnosed as adenocarcinoma after ER. This indicated histological discrepancy between biopsy-proven gastric LGA and histology of the resected material.

Long-Term Outcome After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer in Non-neoplastic Pathology Results

BACKGROUND

After endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC), negative pathological findings cause concern about the adequacy of the procedure and local recurrence after ESD.

AIM

To investigate the incidence of local recurrence in cases with negative pathological findings after ESD for EGC and pathologically complete resection (CR) during long-term follow-up.

METHODS

We reviewed 453 patients who underwent ESD for ECG from January 2007 to December 2010, respectively. Of these patients, in 17 cases the pathology results confirmed no residual tumor (NRT), and in 421 cases they showed CR in the ESD specimen. Finally, 17 NRT and 358 CR cases were followed up during surveillance. Patient characteristics, endoscopic and pathological data were analyzed for risk factors of local recurrence. We also re-evaluated the pathology of the NRT group to identify hidden malignant cells in the previous ESD specimens.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the two groups in terms of recurrence during follow-up surveillance (median 55.7 months). Late local recurrence of EGC was found in two cases (11.8%) in the NRT group, and three early local recurrences (5.6%) were found in the CR group. A review of the pathology in the NRT group revealed hidden malignant cells in five patients (29.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Even when the pathological report indicates NRT after ESD, it might be necessary to re-evaluate ESD specimens with a width <2 mm, and long-term endoscopic surveillance should be routinely used for detecting local EGC recurrence after ESD.

Can magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging discriminate between carcinomas and low grade adenomas in gastric superficial elevated lesions?

Background and study aims: The aim of this study was to investigate the capability of magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) to discriminate between early carcinomas (EC) and low grade adenomas (LGA) in gastric superficial elevated epithelial neoplasias. Patients and methods: We investigated 100 consecutive cases of gastric superficial elevated epithelial neoplasias that were removed using endoscopic submucosal dissection. The pathological diagnostic criteria were based on the revised Vienna classification; category 4 (mucosal high grade neoplasia) and category 5 (submucosal invasion by carcinoma) lesions were diagnosed as EC, whereas category 3 (mucosal low grade neoplasia) lesions were diagnosed as LGA. The associations between the postoperative pathological diagnoses and the ME-NBI findings were analyzed, and included the shape, specification, and area of irregularity in the microvascular architecture (MV) and the microsurface structure (MS). Results: Seventy-nine EC and 21 LGA cases diagnosed postoperatively were evaluated retrospectively. The lesion size (median; range (mm)) was significantly larger in the EC group (14; 2 - 95) compared to the LGA group (5; 2 - 16) (P < 0.001). Wavy forms in the MV shapes (P = 0.031), extension in the MV specifications (P = 0.035), and area with MV irregularity (P = 0.001) were found to be statistically significant predictive findings for EC. Villous forms in the MS shapes (P = 0.026), enlargement in the MS specifications (P = 0.044), and area with MS irregularity (P = 0.021) were also found to be statistically significant predictive findings for EC. The rates of preoperative sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of ME-NBI for discriminating EC were 86.1 %, 38.9 %, and 75 %, respectively. Conclusions: The present study suggests that ME-NBI is useful for the differential diagnosis of EC and LGA in gastric superficial elevated epithelial neoplasias.

STUDY REGISTRATION

UMIN000012925.

Prospective evaluation of the clinical utility of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in patients with Barrett's esophagus: a Western center experience

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) carries significant advantages over endoscopic mucosal resection. As such, ESD is an established therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma but there are only limited data on ESD as therapy for Barrett's esophagus (BE). Thus, we prospectively evaluated the outcomes of ESD in patients with BE with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and early esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) performed in a Western center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a prospective cohort study. Indications for ESD included: (1) early EAC defined as lesions with intramucosal cancer or superficial submucosal invasion; (2) early EAC with positive lateral margin after EMR; and (3) nodularity with HGD that could not be removed en-bloc with EMR Results: From October 2013 to July 2015, 36 consecutive patients (median age 69, 32 males) underwent ESD at our center. Median procedure time was 88 minutes, with median maximal diameter of resected specimens of 49 mm. En-bloc, R0, and curative resection rates were 100 %, 81 %, and 69 %, respectively. Intramucosal EAC was found in 13 patients (36 %), and submucosal invasion in 13 patients (36 %). In 59 % of the cases, there was discrepancy in the pre- and post-ESD histopathologic diagnosis. Adverse events occurred in 8 patients (22 %), including one episode of bleeding treated with endoscopy and seven esophageal strictures, which were successfully managed with dilations.

CONCLUSIONS

ESD for BE with HGD/early EAC is feasible and safe with resulting very high en-bloc and R0 resection rates. ESD provided for more accurate pathologic evaluation and significant discrepancy between the pre- and post-ESD histopathological diagnosis was noted.

Incidence of gastric cancer after endoscopic resection of gastric adenoma

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The annual incidence of metachronous cancer after endoscopic resection (ER) of early gastric cancer (EGC) is approximately 3%. However, the incidence of gastric cancer after ER of a gastric adenoma is not known. The aim of this study was to determine whether the incidence of gastric cancer after ER of a gastric adenoma was different compared with that of metachronous cancer after ER of EGC.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from patients who underwent ER for gastric neoplasia from January 2005 to August 2013. Enrolled patients were divided into 2 groups: patients with low-grade dysplasia were included in the adenoma group and patients with high-grade dysplasia or invasive neoplasia were included in the EGC group. The main outcome was the incidence of gastric cancer after ER.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 28 months, gastric cancer newly developed in 13 adenoma patients (3.6%) and in 30 EGC patients (5.1%). The incidence rate of gastric cancer after ER was 14.4 cases per 1000 person-years in adenoma patients and 18.4 cases per 1000 person-years in EGC patients (P = .309 by the log-rank test). The hazard ratio of metachronous neoplasia in adenoma patients compared with EGC patients was 0.97 (95% confidence interval, 0.62-1.53). Metachronous tumors with invasion beyond the muscularis mucosa were more frequent in adenoma patients than in EGC patients (7/35 [20.0%] vs 3/63 [4.8%], P = .017).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of gastric cancer after ER for gastric adenoma was not significantly different from that of EGC. If further prospective studies confirm these findings, careful endoscopic surveillance with the same level of intensity should be considered for both gastric adenoma and EGC patients after ER.

Predicting pre- and post-resectional histologic discrepancies in gastric low-grade dysplasia: A comparison of white-light and magnifying endoscopy

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of the parameters of conventional white-light endoscopy and magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (MENBI) for the prediction of discrepancies between pre- and post-resectional histology in cases of gastric adenoma with low-grade dysplasia (LGD) that were diagnosed based on endoscopically biopsied specimens.

METHODS

The medical records of 266 lesions with gastric LGD that were diagnosed by endoscopic forceps biopsies were retrospectively reviewed. The Vienna classification was used for histologic diagnosis. These patients all underwent MENBI examinations followed by analyses of the incidence of histologic discrepancies and histologic heterogeneity. The relationship between white-light endoscopic/MENBI parameters and the presence of histologic discrepancies was also analyzed.

RESULTS

Discrepancies between the pre- and post-resectional histologies were found in 74 cases (27.9%). Among those cases, the histology was upgraded in 71 cases, whereas the histology was downgraded in three cases. The presence of erythema and positive MENBI findings were independent factors for the prediction of upgraded histologic discrepancies (P-values = 0.008, < 0.001, respectively). A positive MENBI finding yielded the highest predictive value, with a multivariate adjusted odds ratio of 42.46. Histologic heterogeneity in post-resectional specimens was found in 40.8% of cases with upgraded histologic discrepancies.

CONCLUSIONS

MENBI can provide more accurate information than white-light endoscopy for the prediction of pre- and post-resectional histologic discrepancies in biopsy-proven gastric LGD. Endoscopic resection is strongly recommended in cases with surface erythema on conventional white-light endoscopy or positive MENBI, irrespective of the lesion size.

Helicobacter pylori Eradication Prevents Metachronous Gastric Neoplasms after Endoscopic Resection of Gastric Dysplasia

PURPOSE

There is insufficient data about the role of eradication of H. pylori after endoscopic resection (ER) for gastric dysplasia. The aim was to investigate the benefit of H. pylori eradication after ER in patients with gastric dysplasia to prevent metachronous gastric neoplasms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 1872 patients who underwent ER of gastric dysplasia. We excluded patients with a follow-up period of <2 years or who had not undergone tests for active H. pylori infection. A total of 282 patients were enrolled. The patients were categorized into those without active H. pylori infection (H. pylori-negative group, n = 124), those who successfully underwent H. pylori eradication (eradicated group, n = 122), and those who failed or did not undergo H. pylori eradication (persistent group, n = 36).

RESULTS

Metachronous recurrence was diagnosed in 36 patients, including 19 in the H. pylori-negative group, 10 in the eradicated group, and 7 in the persistent group. The cumulative incidence of metachronous recurrence was significantly lower in the H. pylori-eradicated group in comparison with either of the H. pylori-persistent (non-eradicated or failed) groups (p = 0.039). Similarly, the incidence of metachronous recurrence was significantly lower in the H. pylori-eradicated group compared with the H. pylori-negative group (p = 0.041).

CONCLUSION

Successful H. pylori eradication may reduce the development of metachronous gastric neoplasms after ER in patients with gastric dysplasia.

Endoscopic resection of gastric and esophageal cancer

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) techniques have reduced the need for surgery in early esophageal and gastric cancers and thus has lessened morbidity and mortality in these diseases. ESD is a relatively new technique in western countries and requires rigorous training to reproduce the proficiency of Asian countries, such as Korea and Japan, which have very high complete (en bloc) resection rates and low complication rates. EMR plays a valuable role in early esophageal cancers. ESD has shown better en bloc resection rates but it is easier to master and maintain proficiency in EMR; it also requires less procedural time. For early esophageal adenocarcinoma arising from Barrett’s, ESD and EMR techniques are usually combined with other ablative modalities, the most common being radiofrequency ablation because it has the largest dataset to prove its success. The EMR techniques have been used with some success in early gastric cancers but ESD is currently preferred for most of these lesions. ESD has the added advantage of resecting into the submucosa and thus allowing for endoscopic resection of more aggressive (deeper) early gastric cancer.

How Commonly Is the Diagnosis of Gastric Low Grade Dysplasia Upgraded following Endoscopic Resection? A Meta-Analysis

Gastric dysplasia is a well-known precancerous lesion. Though the diagnosis of gastric low grade dysplasia (LGD) is generally made from endoscopic forceps biopsy (EFB), the accuracy is doubtful after numerous EFB-proven gastric LGD were upgraded to gastric high grade dysplasia (HGD) or even carcinoma (CA) by further diagnostic test with the procedure of endoscopic resection (ER). We aimed to evaluate the upgraded diagnosis rate (UDR) and the risk factors by ER in EFB-proven gastric LGD lesions. Two investigators independently searched studies reporting the UDR by ER in EFB-proven gastric LGD lesions from databases and analyzed the overall UDR, HGD-UDR and CA-UDR. The pooled UDR by ER in EFB-proven gastric LGD lesions was 25.0% (95% CI, 20.2%-29.8%), made up of HGD-UDR and CA-UDR by rates of 16.7% (95% CI, 12.8%-20.6%) and 6.9% (95% CI, 4.2%-9.6%) respectively. Lesion size larger than 2 cm, surface with depression and nodularity under endoscopic examinations were the major risk factors associated with UDR. In conclusion, one quarter of EFB-proven gastric LGD lesions will be diagnosed as advanced lesions, including gastric HGD (16.7%) and gastric CA (6.9%) by ER. The diagnosis of those LGD lesions with an endoscopic diameter larger than 2cm, and depressed or nodular surface are more likely to be upgraded after ER.

Optimal management of biopsy-proven low-grade gastric dysplasia

Gastric adenocarcinoma generally culminates via the inflammation-metaplasia-dysplasia-carcinoma sequence progression. The prevalence of gastric adenomas shows marked geographic variation. Recently, the rate of diagnosis of low-grade dysplasia (LGD) has increased due to increased use of upper endoscopy. Many investigators have reported that gastric high-grade dysplasia has high potential for malignancy and should be removed; however, the treatment for gastric LGD remains controversial. Although the risk of LGD progression to invasive carcinoma has been reported to be inconsistent, progression has been observed during follow-up. Additionally, the rate of upgraded diagnosis in biopsy-proven LGD is high. Therefore, endoscopic resection (ER) may be useful in the treatment and diagnosis of LGD, especially if lesions are found to have risk factors for upgraded histology after ER, such as large size, surface erythema or depressed morphology. Fatal complications in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are extremely low and its therapeutic and diagnostic outcomes are excellent. Therefore, ESD should be applied preferentially instead of endoscopic mucosal resection.

Comparative study of Western and Japanese criteria for biopsy-based diagnosis of gastric epithelial neoplasia

BACKGROUND

In Western countries, gastric cancer (GC) is diagnosed when there is histological evidence of invasion into the lamina propria or beyond the submucosa. In Japan and some other countries, however, diagnosis of GC is based on the degree of structural and cytological abnormality of tumor glands. The aim of the present study was to compare the accuracy of the Western and Japanese criteria for diagnosis of GC.

METHODS

The study included 233 consecutive patients with a postoperative diagnosis of submucosal invasive GC who underwent gastrectomy or endoscopic submucosal dissection. All pretreatment biopsy specimens were independently reviewed by two experts in gastrointestinal pathology employing both the Western and Japanese diagnostic criteria. Diagnostic agreement between pretreatment biopsy specimens and the corresponding resected specimens was evaluated, together with the interobserver agreement for each of the criteria.

RESULTS

On the basis of the Western and Japanese criteria, the pretreatment biopsy diagnosis was noncancerous (including dysplasia) in 44 lesions and 1 lesion, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy based on biopsy was 81.1% for the Western criteria and 99.5% for the Japanese criteria (P < 0.001). Interobserver agreement based on the Western and Japanese criteria was 73.8% and 96.5%, respectively (P < 0.001). Invasion into the submucosa was detected by biopsy in only 25 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The Japanese criteria are significantly more accurate for pretreatment biopsy diagnosis of GC. The Western criteria could lead to underdiagnosis of a lesion as high-grade dysplasia, even if submucosal invasive cancer is present.

Pathological differences between forceps biopsy specimens and endoscopic resection specimens in early gastric cancer patients

Objective: Endoscopic resection(ER) is effective therapy on EGC and which is treated according to the histological diagnosis of forcep biopsy. But sometimes the histological diagnosis of forcep biopsy and post-ER does not match with each other and it might lead to wrong treatment. The aim of this study is to find the frequency of histologic differences between forcep biopsy and post-ER, and to confirm the characteristics of lesions which make errors. Methods: We selected the confirmed cancer cases of 141 patients of 1359 gastric tumor lesions which were treated under the ER in Eulji university hospital from May 2005 to March 2013. They were sorted by the age and sex of patient, location of lesion, present of ulcer and depression to identify the discordance between forcep biopsy and ER. The discordant group was compared with non-cancer-diagnosed controlled group, retrospectively. Results: 70 cases(5.5%) of 1283 cases of “cancer negative” in forceps biopsy were fo䴸nd to be diagnosed cancer on final diagnosis of cancer by post-ER result. In this discordant group showed characteristics of bigger size that are with more frequently in tumor size D15mm(17.9% vs. 31.4%, p=0.03), have depressed lesion(ᄀ 4.3% vs. 41.4%, p&lt;0.01) and have 䴸lceration(2.4% vs.18.6%, p&lt;0.01) than that of 84 control gro䴸p not diagnosed cancer. Conclusions: In cases of tumor with size D15mm, presented with depressed lesion and ulceration, we should consider combined cancer, even the result of forcep biopsy was negative. Therefore, more careful and accurate resection should be taken with characters listed above.

Gastric high-grade dysplasia can be associated with submucosal invasion: evaluation of its prevalence in a series of 121 endoscopically resected specimens

Gastric neoplasms classified as high-grade dysplasia (HGD) by Western pathologists are frequently diagnosed as tubular adenocarcinoma in Japan. Here, we evaluated the prevalence of submucosal and lymphovascular invasion in a series of 125 endoscopically resected gastric neoplasms. On the basis of Western criteria, the lesions were classified as poorly cohesive carcinomas (n=4) (excluded from further analysis), low-grade dysplasia (n=4), pure HGD (n=78), HGD with tubular adenocarcinoma (n=4), and pure tubular adenocarcinoma (n=35). Submucosal invasion was found in 3.8% of the 78 HGDs, 75.0% of the 4 HGDs combined with adenocarcinoma, and 11.4% of the 35 adenocarcinomas. Venous invasion was detected in 1.3% of the 78 HGDs, 75% of the 4 HGDs combined with adenocarcinoma, and none of the 35 tubular adenocarcinomas. Lymphatic invasion was absent in HGD but noted in 25% of the HGDs combined with adenocarcinoma, and 2.9% of the tubular adenocarcinomas. Thus, we demonstrated that lesions characterized as HGD on the basis of Western criteria can be associated with submucosal and lymphovascular invasion. Endoscopic therapy has made it less crucial to differentiate between HGD and intramucosal adenocarcinoma in biopsy samples of small tubular neoplasms. However, it is important to recognize that the criteria for dysplasia currently used in the West may understate the degree of malignant potential. To limit any diagnostic discrepancy between biopsy, endoscopic resection, and surgical specimens, it is suggested that the features of HGD and adenocarcinoma be reevaluated, which may result in some lesions being classified as mucosal adenocarcinoma.

Endoscopic resection as a first therapy for gastric epithelial atypia: is it reasonable?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Gastric atypical cell (GAC), an indefinite pathologic finding, often requires repeated biopsy or other diagnostic treatments, such as endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), or operation (OP). The aim of this study was to analyze the initial endoscopic and histologic findings of GAC and to discuss the necessity of EMR/ESD at establishing a correct diagnosis.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 96 patients proven as GAC on index forceps biopsy. ESD (17/96, 17.7%), EMR (5/96, 5.2%), OP (20/96, 20.8%), and other treatment or follow-up (54/96, 56.3%) were performed. We analyzed the initial endoscopic and histologic characteristics of GAC lesions, predictive of neoplasm.

RESULTS

After diagnostic modalities, the final pathologic diagnoses were cancer (36/96, 37.6%), dysplasia (9/96, 9.4%), and non-neoplasm (51/96, 53.0%). In univariate analysis, age [odds ratio (OR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.07], lesion size of 10 mm or greater (OR 3.94, 95% CI 1.61-9.61), lesion with depressed type (OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.09-5.72), and presence of H. pylori (OR 2.83, 95% CI 1.11-7.25) were risk factors for neoplasm. In multivariate analysis, lesion size of 10 mm or greater (OR 3.63, 95% CI 1.23-10.66), lesion with depressed type (OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.11-7.38) were independent risk factors for cancer.

CONCLUSION

Considering the neoplastic risk of GAC, which could be missed on biopsy, more comprehensive tissue sampling via EMR/ESD might be necessary to establish a definite diagnosis.

Assessment of gastric phenotypes using magnifying narrow-band imaging for differentiation of gastric carcinomas from adenomas

Background. Conventional white-light endoscopy and forceps biopsy are insufficient for definitive diagnosis of gastric adenoma. Immunohistochemical studies have reported an obvious phenotypic difference between adenomas and carcinomas. We investigated the utility of narrow-band imaging with magnifying endoscopy (NBI-ME) for mucin phenotypic assessment to differentiate carcinomas from adenomas. Methods. NBI-ME findings were classified into A, B, and AB types, which revealed papillary, tubular pits and groove microstructures, respectively. To investigate A-B classifications retrospectively, 137 patients (155 lesions) that were diagnosed pretherapeutically with adenoma or borderline lesions by biopsy were enrolled. The mucin phenotype was analyzed immunohistochemically in the first 60 lesions. Results. After endoscopic submucosal dissection, A type and AB type lesions were determined histologically as carcinoma (81/82, 99%). B type lesions were adenoma (29/73, 40%) and carcinoma (44/73, 60%). A or AB type correlated to histological carcinomas (sensitivity 65%, specificity 97%, and accuracy 71%). Mucin phenotypes were gastric or gastrointestinal in A type and AB type carcinomas (31/37, 84%) and intestinal in B type adenomas and carcinomas (21/23, 91%). Conclusions. NBI-ME has the advantage of the assessment of mucin phenotypes in gastric carcinomas and adenomas. The proposed A-B classification is useful, especially for differentiation of gastric or gastrointestinal carcinomas from adenomas.

Endoscopic features suggesting gastric cancer in biopsy-proven gastric adenoma with high-grade neoplasia

AIM

To elucidate the endoscopic features that predict the cancer following endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in patients with high-grade neoplasia (HGN).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients who underwent ESD of gastric neoplasms from January 2007 to September 2010. ESD was performed in 555 cases involving 550 patients. A total of 112 lesions from 110 consecutive patients were initially diagnosed as HGN without cancer by forceps biopsy, and later underwent ESD. We classified lesions into two groups according to histologic discrepancies between the biopsy and ESD diagnosis. Gastric adenoma in the final diagnosis by ESD specimens were defined as adenoma group. Lesions with coexisting cancer after ESD were defined as cancer group.

RESULTS

The mean age was 65.3 years, and 81 patients were male. There was no significant difference in the age or gender distribution between the adenoma (n = 52) and cancer (n = 60) groups. Thirty-six of these lesions (32.1%) showed histologic concordance between the forceps biopsy and ESD specimens, 16 (14.3%) showed a downgraded histology (low-grade neoplasia), and 60 (53.6%) showed an upgraded histology (cancer). A red color change of the mucosal surface on endoscopy was found in 27/52 (51.9%) of cases in the adenoma group and in 46/60 (76.7%) of cases in the cancer group (P = 0.006). Ulceration of the mucosal surface on endoscopy was found in 5 (9.6%) of 52 lesions in the adenoma group and in 17 (28.3%) of 60 lesions in the cancer group (P = 0.013). In the multivariate analysis, a reddish surface color change and mucosal ulceration were significant predictive factors correlated with cancer after ESD of the HGN by forceps biopsy.

CONCLUSION

HGN with a red color change or mucosal ulceration correlated with the presence of gastric cancer. These finding may help to guide the diagnosis and treatment.

Effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on subsequent dysplasia development after endoscopic resection of gastric dysplasia

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori reduces the incidence of gastric cancer, and may inhibit gastric dysplasia progression into gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of eradication of Helicobacter on the incidence of subsequent gastric dysplasia development after endoscopic resection.

METHODS

Medical records of patients who underwent endoscopic resection for gastric dysplasia were retrospectively reviewed. Presence of H. pylori was assessed by the Campylobacter-like organism test and histology. The rate of subsequent dysplasia development after endoscopic resection between the eradication group and non-eradication group was compared.

RESULTS

Total of 129 patients positive for H. pylori infection were included for analysis. Of these, 85 patients received successful eradication therapy and 44 patients did not receive eradication therapy or failed to achieve successful eradication. Sex, mean age and pathologic grade of dysplasia did not differ between the two groups. In univariate analysis, the grade of intestinal metaplasia (p=0.013) significantly differed between metachronous dysplasia group and non-metachrounous dysplasia group. In multivariate analysis, eradication of H. pylori (p=0.014) was related to reduced incidence of subsequent gastric dysplasia development after endoscopic resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Eradication of H. pylori likely has a beneficial effect in preventing the development of subsequent gastric dysplasia, a premalignant lesion of gastric cancer, after endoscopic resection.