Drainage of esophageal leakage using endoscopic vacuum therapy: a prospective pilot study

Understanding Post-Esophagectomy Complications and Their Management: The Early Complications

Esophagectomy is a technically complex operation performed for both benign and malignant esophageal disease. Medical and surgical advancements have led to improved outcomes in esophagectomy patients over the past several decades; however, surgeons must remain vigilant as complications happen often and can be severe. Post-esophagectomy complications can be grouped into early and late categories. The aim of this review is to discuss the early complications of esophagectomy along with their risk factors, work-up, and management strategies with special attention given to anastomotic leaks.

Endoscopic treatment of upper gastrointestinal postsurgical leaks: a narrative review

Upper gastrointestinal postsurgical leaks are life-threatening conditions with high mortality rates and are one of the most feared complications of surgery. Leaks are challenging to manage and often require radiological, endoscopic, or surgical intervention. Steady advancements in interventional endoscopy in recent decades have allowed the development of new endoscopic devices and techniques that provide a more effective and minimally invasive therapeutic option compared to surgery. Since there is no consensus regarding the most appropriate therapeutic approach for managing postsurgical leaks, this review aimed to summarize the best available current data. Our discussion specifically focuses on leak diagnosis, treatment aims, comparative endoscopic technique outcomes, and combined multimodality approach efficacy.

Endoscopic vacuum therapy for treatment of spontaneous and iatrogenic upper gastrointestinal defects

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) can heal a variety of defects within the gastrointestinal (GI) tract via applying negative pressure, which reduces the defect size, aspirates the infected fluid, and promotes granulation tissue. Here we present our experience with EVT as it relates to both spontaneous and iatrogenic upper GI tract perforations, leaks, and fistulas.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted at four large hospital centers. All patients who underwent EVT between June 2018 and March 2021 were included. Data on multiple variables were collected, including demographics, defect size and location, number and intervals of EVT exchanges, technical success, and hospital length of stay. Student t-test and the chi-squared test were used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Twenty patients underwent EVT. The most common defect cause was spontaneous esophageal perforation (50%). The most common defect location was the distal esophagus (55%). The success rate was 80%. Seven patients were treated with EVT as the primary closure method. The mean number of exchanges was five with a mean interval of 4.3 days between exchanges. The mean length of hospital stay was 55.8 days.

CONCLUSION

EVT is a safe and effective initial management option for esophageal leaks and perforations.

Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy for Upper Gastrointestinal Leaks and Perforations: Analysis From a Multicenter Spanish Registry

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) is a novel technique for closing upper gastrointestinal (UGI) defects. Available literature includes single-center retrospective cohort studies with small sample sizes. Furthermore, evidence about factors associated with EVT failure is scarce. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of EVT for the resolution of UGI defects in a multicenter study and to investigate the factors associated with EVT failure and in-hospital mortality.

METHODS

This is a prospective cohort study in which consecutive EVT procedures for the treatment of UGI defects from 19 Spanish hospitals were recorded in the national registry between November 2018 and March 2022.

RESULTS

We included 102 patients: 89 with anastomotic leaks and 13 with perforations. Closure of the defect was achieved in 84 cases (82%). A total of 6 patients (5.9%) had adverse events related to the EVT. The in-hospital mortality rate was 12.7%. A total of 6 patients (5.9%) died because of EVT failure and 1 case (0.9%) due to a fatal adverse event. Time from diagnosis of the defect to initiation of EVT was the only independent predictor for EVT failure (odds ratio [OR] 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.05, P = 0.005). EVT failure (OR 24.5, 95% CI 4.5-133, P = 0.001) and development of pneumonia after EVT (OR 246.97, 95% CI 11.15-5,472.58, P = 0.0001) were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality.

DISCUSSION

EVT is safe and effective in cases of anastomotic leak and perforations of the upper digestive tract. The early use of EVT improves the efficacy of this technique.

Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy of Upper Gastrointestinal Anastomotic Leaks: How to Deal with the Challenges (with Video)

Anastomotic leaks after gastrointestinal surgery have an important impact on surgical outcomes because of the high morbidity and mortality rates. Multiple treatment options exist requiring an individualized patient-tailored treatment plan after multidisciplinary discussion. Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) is a novel treatment option that is nowadays recognized as an effective and useful endoscopic approach to treat leaks or perforations in both the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. EVT has a very good safety profile. However, it is a time-consuming endeavour requiring engagement from the endoscopist and understanding from the patient. To the unexperienced, the EVT technique may be prone to several hurdles which may deter endoscopists from using it and depriving patients from a potentially life-saving therapeutic option. The current review highlights the possible difficulties of the EVT procedure and aims to provide some practical solutions to facilitate its use in daily clinical practice. Personal tips and tricks are shared to overcome the pre-, intra- and post-procedural hurdles. An instructive video of the procedure helps to illustrate the technique of EVT.

Applications of endoscopic vacuum therapy in the upper gastrointestinal tract

Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) is an increasingly popular treatment option for wall defects in the upper gastrointestinal tract. After its initial description for the treatment of anastomotic leaks after esophageal and gastric surgery, it was also implemented for a wide range of defects, including acute perforations, duodenal lesions, and postbariatric complications. Apart from the initially proposed handmade sponge inserted using the “piggyback” technique, further devices were used, such as the commercially available EsoSponge and VAC-Stent as well as open-pore film drainage. The reported pressure settings and intervals between the subsequent endoscopic procedures vary greatly, but all available evidence highlights the efficacy of EVT, with high success rates and low morbidity and mortality, so that in many centers it is considered to be a first-line treatment, especially for anastomotic leaks.

Technical Review on Endoscopic Treatment Devices for Management of Upper Gastrointestinal Postsurgical Leaks

Upper gastrointestinal postsurgical leaks are challenging to manage and often require radiological, endoscopic, or surgical intervention. Nowadays, endoscopy is considered the first-line approach for their management, however, there is no definite consensus on the most appropriate therapeutic approach. There is a wide diversity of endoscopic options, from close-cover-divert approaches to active or passive internal drainage approaches. Theoretically, all these options can be used alone or with a multimodality approach, as each of them has different mechanisms of action. The approach to postsurgical leaks should always be tailored to each patient, taking into account the several variables that may influence the final outcome. In this review, we discuss the important developments in endoscopic devices for the treatment of postsurgical leaks. Our discussion specifically focuses on principles and mechanism of action, advantages and disadvantages of each technique, indications, clinical success, and adverse events. An algorithm for endoscopic approach is proposed.

Endoscopic vacuum therapy significantly improves clinical outcomes of anastomotic leakages after 2-stage, 3-stage, and transhiatal esophagectomies

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leakages after esophagectomies continue to constitute significant morbidity and mortality. Intrathoracic anastomoses pose a high risk for mediastinitis, sepsis, and death, if a leak is not addressed timely and appropriately. However, there are no standardized treatment recommendations or algorithms as for how to treat these leakages.

METHODS

The study included all patients at the University Hospital Regensburg, who developed an anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy with gastric pull-up reconstruction from 2007 to 2022. Patients receiving conventional treatment options for an anastomotic leakage (stents, drainage tubes, clips, etc.) were compared to patients receiving endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure (eVAC) therapy as their mainstay of treatment. Treatment failure was defined as cervical esophagostomy formation or death.

RESULTS

In total, 37 patients developed an anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy with a gastric pull-up reconstruction. Twenty patients were included into the non-eVAC cohort, whereas 17 patients were treated with eVAC. Treatment failure was observed in 50% of patients (n = 10) in the non-eVAC cohort and in 6% of patients (n = 1) in the eVAC cohort (p < 0.05). The 90-day mortality in the non-eVAC cohort was 15% (n = 3) compared to 6% (n = 1) in the eVAC cohort. Cervical esophagostomy formation was required in 40% of cases (n = 8) in the non-eVAC cohort, whereas no patient in the eVAC cohort underwent cervical esophagostomy formation.

CONCLUSION

eVAC therapy for leaking esophagogastric anastomoses appears to be superior to other treatment strategies as it significantly reduces morbidity and mortality. Therefore, we suggest eVAC as an essential component in the treatment algorithm for anastomotic leakages following esophagectomies, especially in patients with intrathoracic anastomoses.

Endoscopic vacuum therapy for post-esophagectomy anastomotic dehiscence as rescue treatment: a single center case series

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) represents an effective endoscopic technique for the treatment of post-esophagectomy leaks and can be used after failure of primary treatment. We aimed to investigate endoscopic data and success rate of EVT for post-esophagectomy anastomotic leaks, after failed redo surgery or previous endoscopic treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively recruited 12 patients from January 2018 to October 2020. Success was defined as dehiscence closure at radiological and/or endoscopic evaluation. Ethical Committee of our institution approved the study.

RESULTS

Twelve patients (66.7% male, mean age 65.08 ± 16.7 years) affected by esophago-gastric (n = 10) or esophago-jejunal (n = 2) anastomosis dehiscences after oncologic surgery were treated with EVT, after failure of previous redo-surgical (n = 3, 25%) or endoscopic management (n = 9, 75%). Technical success rate was 100% (60/60 procedures) and dehiscence closure was achieved in three quarters of patients (9/12, 75%). Regarding complications, one case of sponge dislocation (1/60 = 1.7%) and another case of delayed stricture after post-EVT stent placement (1/60 = 1.7%) were recorded, during a mean follow up of 182.3 days.

CONCLUSIONS

EVT is a promising option in the treatment of the most complicated anastomotic dehiscences. Its use could be also considered after failure of previous endoscopic or surgical management.

Endoscopic Management for Post-Surgical Complications after Resection of Esophageal Cancer

Simple Summary

Flexible endoscopy has an important part in the diagnosis and treatment of postoperative complications after oncologically intended esophagectomy. Endoscopy offers the possibility of effective therapy with minimal invasiveness at the same time, and the use of endoscopic therapy procedures can avoid re-operations. In this review we present the advantages of endoscopic treatment opportunities during the last 20 years regarding patients’ treatment after esophageal cancer resection. According to prevalence and clinical relevance, four relevant postoperative complications were identified and their endoscopic treatment procedures discussed. All endoscopic therapy procedures for anastomotic bleeding, anastomotic insufficiencies, anastomotic stenosis and postoperative delayed gastric emptying are presented, including innovative developments.

Abstract

Background: Esophageal cancer (EC) is the sixth-leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the world. Esophagectomy is the most effective treatment for patients without invasion of adjacent organs or distant metastasis. Complications and relevant problems may occur in the early post-operative course or in a delayed fashion. Here, innovative endoscopic techniques for the treatment of postsurgical problems were developed during the past 20 years. Methods: Endoscopic treatment strategies for the following postoperative complications are presented: anastomotic bleeding, anastomotic insufficiency, delayed gastric passage and anastomotic stenosis. Based on a literature review covering the last two decades, therapeutic procedures are presented and analyzed. Results: Addressing the four complications mentioned, clipping, stenting, injection therapy, dilatation, and negative pressure therapy are successfully utilized as endoscopic treatment techniques today. Conclusion: Endoscopic treatment plays a major role in both early-postoperative and long-term aftercare. During the past 20 years, essential therapeutic measures have been established. A continuous development of these techniques in the field of endoscopy can be expected.

OUP accepted manuscript

Background

Anastomotic leakage (AL) after oesophagectomy and oesophageal perforations are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Minimally invasive endoscopy is often used as first-line treatment, particularly endoluminal vacuum therapy (EVT). The aim was to assess the performance of the first commercially available endoluminal vacuum device (Eso-Sponge®) in the management of AL and perforation of the upper gastrointestinal tract (GIT).

Methods

The Eso-Sponge® registry was designed in 2014 as a prospective, observational, national, multicentre registry. Patients were recruited with either AL or perforation within the upper GIT. Data were collected with a standardized form and transferred into a web-based platform. Twenty hospitals were enrolled at the beginning of the study (registration number NCT02662777; http://www.clinicaltrials.gov). The primary endpoint was successful closure of the oesophageal defect.

Results

Eleven out of 20 centres recruited patients. A total of 102 patients were included in this interim analysis; 69 patients with AL and 33 with a perforation were treated by EVT. In the AL group, a closure of 91 per cent was observed and 76 per cent was observed in the perforation group. The occurrence of mediastinitis (P = 0.002) and the location of the defect (P = 0.008) were identified as significant predictors of defect closure.

Conclusions

The Eso-Sponge® registry offers the opportunity to collate data on EVT with a uniform, commercially available product to improve standardization. Our data show that EVT with the Eso-Sponge® is an option for the management of AL and perforation within the upper GIT.

Evolution of endoscopic vacuum therapy for upper gastrointestinal leakage over a 10-year period: a quality improvement study

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) is an effective treatment option for leakage of the upper gastrointestinal (UGI) tract. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of quality improvements in EVT management on patients' outcome.

METHODS

All patients treated by EVT at our center during 2012-2021 were divided into two consecutive and equal-sized cohorts (period 1 vs. period 2). Over time several quality improvement strategies were implemented including the earlier diagnosis and EVT treatment and technical optimization of endoscopy. The primary endpoint was defined as the composite score MTL30 (mortality, transfer, length-of-stay > 30 days). Secondary endpoints included EVT efficacy, complications, in-hospital mortality, length-of-stay (LOS) and nutrition status at discharge.

RESULTS

A total of 156 patients were analyzed. During the latter period the primary endpoint MTL30 decreased from 60.8 to 39.0% (P = .006). EVT efficacy increased from 80 to 91% (P = .049). Further, the need for additional procedures for leakage management decreased from 49.9 to 29.9% (P = .013) and reoperations became less frequent (38.0% vs.15.6%; P = .001). The duration of leakage therapy and LOS were shortened from 25 to 14 days (P = .003) and 38 days to 25 days (P = .006), respectively. Morbidity (as determined by the comprehensive complication index) decreased from 54.6 to 46.5 (P = .034). More patients could be discharged on oral nutrition (70.9% vs. 84.4%, P = .043).

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience confirms the efficacy of EVT for the successful management of UGI leakage. Our quality improvement analysis demonstrates significant changes in EVT management resulting in accelerated recovery, fewer complications and improved functional outcome.

Current status in endoscopic management of upper gastrointestinal perforations, leaks and fistulas

Recent advancement in endoscopic closure techniques have revolutionized the treatment of gastrointestinal perforations, leaks and fistulas. Traditionally, these have been managed surgically. The treatment strategy depends on the size and location of the defect, degree of contamination, presence of healthy surrounding tissues, patients' condition and the availability of expertise. One of the basic principles of management includes providing a barricade to the flow of luminal contents across the defect. This can be achieved with a wide range of endoscopic techniques. These include endoclips, stenting, suturing, tissue adhesives and glue, and endoscopic vacuum therapy. Each method has their distinct indications and shortcomings. Often, a combination of these techniques is required. Apart from endoscopic closure, drainage procedures by the interventional radiologist and surgical management also play an important role. In this review article, the outcomes of each of these endoscopic closure techniques in the literature is provided in tables, and practical management algorithms are being proposed.

Endoscopic vacuum therapy in salvage and standalone treatment of gastric leaks after bariatric surgery

Introduction

Gastric leaks constitute some of the most severe complications after obesity surgery. Resulting peritonitis can lead to inflammatory changes of the stomach wall and might necessitate drainage. The inflammatory changes make gastric leak treatment difficult. A common endoscopic approach of using stents causes the problem of inadequate leak sealing and the need for an external drainage. Based on promising results using endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) for esophageal leaks, we implemented this concept for gastric leak treatment after bariatric surgery (Ahrens et al., Endoscopy 42(9):693–698, 2010; Schniewind et al., Surg Endosc 27(10):3883–3890, 2013).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data of 31 gastric leaks after bariatric surgery. For leak therapy management, we used revisional laparoscopy with suturing and drainage. EVT was added for persistent leaks in sixteen cases and was used in four cases as standalone therapy.

Results

Twenty-one gastric leaks occurred in 521 sleeve gastrectomies (leakage rate 4.0%), 9 in 441 Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses (leakage rate 2.3%), and 1 in 12 mini-bypasses. Eleven of these gastric leaks were detected within 2 days after bariatric surgery and successfully treated by revision surgery. Sixteen gastric leaks, re-operated later than 2 days, remained after revision surgery, and EVT was added. Without revision surgery, we performed EVT as standalone therapy in 4 patients with late gastric leaks. The EVT healing rate was 90% (18 of 20). In 2 patients with a late gastric leak in sleeve gastrectomy, neither revisional surgery, EVT, nor stent therapy was successful. EVT patients showed no complications related to EVT during follow-up.

Conclusion

EVT is highly beneficial in cases of gastric leaks in obesity surgery where local peritonitis is present. Revisional surgery was unsuccessful later than 2 days after primary surgery (16 of 16 cases). EVT shows a similar healing rate to stent therapy (80–100%) but a shorter duration of treatment. The advantages of EVT are endoscopic access, internal drainage, rapid granulation, and direct therapy control. In compartmentalized gastric leaks, EVT was successful as a standalone therapy without external drainage.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00423-021-02365-9.

Current Status of Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy in the Management of Esophageal Perforations and Post-Operative Leaks

Esophageal wall defects, including perforations and postoperative leaks, are associated with high morbidity and mortality and pose a significant management challenge. In light of the high morbidity of surgical management or revision, in recent years, endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) has emerged as a novel alternative treatment strategy. EVT involves transoral endoscopic placement of a polyurethane sponge connected to an externalized nasogastric tube to provide continuous negative pressure with the intention of promoting defect healing, facilitating cavity drainage, and ameliorating sepsis. In the last decade, EVT has become increasingly adopted in the management of a diverse spectrum of esophageal defects. Its popularity has been attributed in part to the growing body of evidence suggesting superior outcomes and defect closure rates in excess of 80%. This growing body of evidence, coupled with the ongoing evolution of the technology and techniques of deployment, suggests that the utilization of EVT has become increasingly widespread. Here, we aimed to review the current status of the field, addressing the mechanism of action, indications, technique methodology, efficacy, safety, and practical considerations of EVT implementation. We also sought to highlight future directions for the use of EVT in esophageal wall defects.

[Endoscopy on the surgical intensive care unit]

Endoscopy is most frequently performed in intensive care units (ICU) for gastrointestinal bleeding; however, there are other indications for performing an endoscopy on the ICU. This article shows the indications for this, the background and the peri-interventional and postinterventional management. The endoscopic placement of a postpyloric feeding tube is a well-established procedure. For anastomotic leakage in the esophagus and rectum, the endoscopic vacuum therapy is the treatment of choice. Gastrointestinal motility disorders are a frequent phenomenon in critically ill patients and are associated with increased mortality. With a cecal diameter > 9-12 mm, endoscopic decompression can be performed; however, this is associated with an increased risk of perforation and should only be carried out after the failure of conservative treatment.

The success of Eso-SPONGE® therapy in the treatment of anastomotic dehiscence after Ivor-Lewis subtotal esophagectomy: A case report

Introduction

Eso-SPONGE® has proved to be an excellent method for the treatment of persistent dehiscence of the intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis during the operation of subtotal esophagectomy sec. Ivor Lewis.

Clinical case presentation

The case presented is of a 72-year-old patient with esophageal adenocarcinoma (ADK) who underwent sub-total esophagectomy and esophagoplasty sec. Ivor Lewis complicated by an esophageal leak. The Eso-SPONGE® therapy has been successful halving the index of inflammation after the first two sessions and generation of a neowall after seven sessions.

Discussion

Eso-SPONGE® therapy has proven to be a valuable resource as a treatment for esophageal anastomotic dehiscences because it is easily repeatable in suburban centers, provided that they have a digestive endoscopy specialized in the positioning process.

Conclusions

Eso-SPONGE® is a minimally invasive method that delivers excellent results in the treatment of fragile patients, such as those who have post-esophageal anastomotic dehiscence.

•

Anastomotic dehiscence is an adverse event in esophageal surgery.

•

Eso-SPONGE® is an excellent method to treat the esophageal post-surgery dehiscence.

•

Eso-SPONGE® has provided better results than previous methods.

•

Eso-SPONGE® is easily repeatable even in not-expert centers.

Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy via Pharyngostomy: Novel Access for Management of Upper Gastrointestinal Defects

BACKGROUND

Perforation and anastomotic leakage of the upper gastrointestinal tract (UGI) has a high mortality and morbidity rate. Recently, UGI leaks have been treated with endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT). However, this technique traditionally requires multiple EVT changes and a prolonged and uncomfortable nasoenteric intubation. We describe our experience using EVT through a novel pharyngostomy access to manage UGI leaks.

METHODS

We describe our development and implementation of EVT via a novel pharyngostomy access to treat a variety of UGI defects. Preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative data were analyzed.

RESULTS

Six patients with UGI perforations or anastomotic leaks were treated with an EVT using a pharyngostomy access. The median age was 69 years (IQR 53-71). Four patients leaked after an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, one after a robotic para-esophageal hernia repair, and another after a Roux en Y esophagojejunostomy. Defects were detected on a median of 11.5 days (IQR 3-21). Median values for the duration of the EVT therapy and the number of EVT changes were 19.5 days (IQR 14-31) and 7 (IQR 6.5-9), respectively. Four of the patients were discharged with an EVT in place and were successfully managed as outpatients. At a median follow-up of 8 months, two patients developed strictures. None of the patients required any surgical re-intervention, they tolerated oral intake, and all leakages were confirmed closed by imaging and endoscopy.

DISCUSSION

Endoscopic vacuum therapy can be successfully managed through a pharyngostomy access, as described. This access is easy, comfortable, and reliable and allows for a transition to outpatient management.

A Comprehensive Review of Endoscopic Management of Sleeve Gastrectomy Leaks

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery leaks result in significant morbidity and mortality. Experts report variable therapeutic approaches, without uniform guidelines or consensus.

OBJECTIVE

To review the pathogenesis, risk factors, prevention, and treatment of gastric sleeve leaks, with a focus on endoscopic approaches. In addition, the efficacy and success rates of different treatment modalities are assessed.

DESIGN

A comprehensive review was conducted using a thorough literature search of 5 online electronic databases (PubMed, PubMed Central, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Web of Science) from the time of their inception through March 2020. Studies evaluating gastric sleeve leaks were included. MeSH terms related to "endoscopic," "leak," "sleeve," "gastrectomy," "anastomotic," and "bariatric" were applied to a highly sensitive search strategy. The main outcomes were epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Literature search yielded 2418 studies of which 438 were incorporated into the review. Shock and peritonitis necessitate early surgical intervention for leaks. Endoscopic therapies in acute and early leaks involve modalities with a focus on one of: (i) defect closure, (ii) wall diversion, or (iii) wall exclusion. Surgical revision is required if endoscopic therapies fail to control leaks after 6 months. Chronic leaks require one or more endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical approaches for fluid collection drainage to facilitate adequate healing. Success rates depend on provider and center expertise.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic management of leaks post sleeve gastrectomy is a minimally invasive and effective alternative to surgery. Their effect may vary based on clinical presentation, timing or leak morphology, and should be tailored to the appropriate endoscopic modality of treatment.

An Approach to Accelerate Healing and Shorten the Hospital Stay of Patients With Anastomotic Leakage After Esophagectomy: An Explorative Study of Systematic Endoscopic Intervention

Objective

To explore the comprehensive role of systemic endoscopic intervention in healing esophageal anastomotic leak.

Methods

In total, 3919 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy and immediate esophageal reconstruction were screened. In total, 203 patients (5.10%) diagnosed with anastomotic leakage were included. The participants were divided into three groups according to differences in diagnosis and treatment procedures. Ninety-four patients received conventional management, 87 patients received endoscopic diagnosis only, and the remaining 22 patients received systematic endoscopic intervention. The primary endpoint was overall healing of the leak after oncologic esophageal surgery. The secondary endpoints were the time from surgery to recovery and the occurrence of adverse events.

Results

173 (85.2%; 95% CI, 80.3-90.1%) of the 203 patients were successfully healed, with a mean healing time of 66.04 ± 3.59 days (median: 51 days; range: 13-368 days), and the overall healing rates differed significantly among the three groups according to the stratified log-rank test (P<0.001). The median healing time of leakage was 37 days (95% CI: 33.32-40.68 days) in the endoscopic intervention group, 51 days (95% CI: 44.86-57.14 days) in the endoscopic diagnostic group, and 67 days (95% CI: 56.27-77.73 days) in the conventional group. The overall survival rate was 78.7% (95% CI: 70.3 to 87.2%) in the conventional management group, 89.7% (95% CI: 83.1 to 96.2%) in the endoscopic diagnostic group and 95.5% (95% CI: 86.0 to 100%) in the systematic endoscopic intervention group. Landmark analysis indicated that the speed of wound healing in the endoscopic intervention group was 2-4 times faster at any period than that in the conservative group. There were 20 (21.28%) deaths among the 94 patients in the conventional group, 9 (10.34%) deaths among the 87 patients in the endoscopic diagnostic group and 1 (4.55%) death among the 22 patients in the endoscopic intervention group; this difference was statistically significant (Fisher exact test, P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Tailored endoscopic treatment for postoperative esophageal anastomotic leakage based on endoscopic diagnosis is feasible and effective. Systematic endoscopic intervention shortened the treatment period and reduced mortality and should therefore be considered in the management of this disease.

Classification and evaluation of anastomotic leaks after esophageal surgery—a tertiary university experience

Background

Anastomotic insufficiency of the esophagus is the most feared complication of surgeons, leading to high postoperative morbidity and mortality. However, there is no internationally accepted guideline for its classification and treatment algorithm. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the detection of anastomotic leaks as well as to discuss and validate the classification proposed by the Surgical Working Group on Endoscopy and Ultrasound in late 2018.

Methods

All patients undergoing surgery for malignancy of the esophagogastric junction between 2013 and 2020 were analyzed. Out of these patients, those diagnosed with an anastomotic insufficiency were extracted and classified according to the classification proposed by the Surgical Working Group on Endoscopy and Ultrasound. Continuous variables were expressed as medians, categorical variables were compared using Fisher’s exact test or chi-square test.

Results

From 2013 to 2020, all 23 patients (10.84%) who developed an anastomotic leak after esophageal surgery were included in this study. The study revealed a significant increase in median hospital stay, median intensive care unit stay, and overall mortality rate (p = 0.028) with increased classification type.

Conclusion

The results of this study showed that the classification proposed by the Surgical Working Group on Endoscopy and Ultrasound can be validated and that there is a clear differentiation between the subtypes. Standardized diagnosis and management improve the overall outcome of patients.

Main novel aspects

This article gives an introduction to classifying anastomotic insufficiencies according to the classification proposed by the Surgical Working Group on Endoscopy and Ultrasound.

Results of the classification can be validated, with a clear differentiation of postoperative outcome between subtypes.

Modified vacuum-assisted closure (EndoVAC) therapy for treatment of pharyngocutaneous fistula: Case series and a review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Pharyngocutaneous fistula is a potential life-threatening complication following head and neck surgery. There is only limited evidence about the efficacy of vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy and endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure (EndoVAC) therapy for the treatment of pharyngocutaneous fistulas.

METHODS

In this article, we report on a consecutive case series of six male patients with pharyngocutaneous fistula treated with a modified outside-in EndoVAC technique. We also present a review of the current related literature.

RESULTS

EndoVAC therapy alone was successful in five of the six patients (83.3%) with a median duration of EndoVAC therapy of 18.5 days (range: 7 to 32 days) and a median number of EndoVAC sponge changes of 4 (range: 1 to 9 changes). One patient needed additional reconstructive surgery after prior radiochemotherapy and jejunal transfer. No treatment-related complications were observed.

CONCLUSION

EndoVAC therapy is an easy-to-perform, safe procedure for the treatment of pharyngocutaneous fistulae.

Endoscopic negative pressure therapy for leaks with large cavities in the upper gastrointestinal tract: is it a feasible therapeutic option?

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic negative pressure therapy (ENPT) is an increasingly popular method for the treatment of various defects of the upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract and has been associated with high success rates. The largest reported series focus on intraluminal therapy of local defects, whereas larger defects connected to the abdominal or pleural cavity are still regarded as indications for surgical revision in many units. The aim of our study is to assess the efficacy and the periinterventional characteristics of ENPT applications in patients with defects with large cavities in the upper GI tract.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed all cases of ENPT applications in the upper gastrointestinal tract performed in our clinic between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2019 and identified the patients with defects leading to large cavities with a length of at least 7 cm. The procedural characteristics, intraprocedural and late complications and overall clinical success were analysed.

RESULTS

We identified 14 cases meeting our inclusion criteria. In all cases, an intracavitary or combined intracavitary and intraluminal ENPT was applied. The average duration of therapy was 47.5 days and included an average of 10.4 changes per patient in an interval of 4.5 days. Clinical success rate was 92.9%, average hospital stay was 74.5 days. In three cases, a late stenosis occurred, which could be treated endoscopically.

CONCLUSION

Based on the data of our case series, we conclude that ENPT is a feasible and promising therapeutic option for upper GI defects with contact to large cavities.

Economic Burden of Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy Compared to Alternative Therapy Methods in Patients with Anastomotic Leakage After Esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) has become a promising option in the management of anastomotic leakage (AL) after esophagectomy. However, EVT is an effortful approach associated with multiple interventions. In this study, we conduct a comparative cost analysis for methods of management of AL.

METHODS

All patients who experienced AL treated by EVT, stent, or reoperation following Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer were included. Cases that were managed by more than one modality were excluded. For the remaining cases, in-patient treatment cost was collected for material, personnel, (par)enteral nutrition, intensive care, operating room, and imaging.

RESULTS

42 patients were treated as follows: EVT n = 25, stent n = 13, and reoperation n = 4. The mean duration of therapy as well as length of overall hospital stay was significantly shorter in the stent than the EVT group (30 vs. 44d, p = 0.046; 34 vs. 53d, p = 0.02). The total mean cost for stent was €33.685, and the total cost for EVT was €46.136, resulting in a delta increase of 37% for EVT vs. stent cost. 75% (€34.320, EVT), respectively, 80% (€26.900, stent) of total costs were caused by ICU stay. Mean pure costs for endoscopic management were relatively low and comparable between both groups (EVT: €1.900, stent: €1.100, p = 0.28).

CONCLUSION

Management of AL represents an effortful approach that results in high overall costs. The expenses directly related to EVT and stent therapy were however comparatively low with more than 75% of costs being attributable to the ICU stay. Reduction of ICU care should be a central part of cost reduction strategies.

Non-surgical treatment of esophageal perforation after pneumatic dilation for achalasia: a case series

Esophageal perforation is the most serious complication of pneumatic dilation for achalasia and is traditionally managed by conservative therapy or surgical repair. We present four achalasia patients who underwent pneumatic dilatation, complicated by an esophageal perforation. All patients were treated successfully with endoscopic treatment: two patients with Eso-SPONGE^® vacuum therapy, in the other two patients, esophageal defects were closed endoscopically using Endoclips. The time between dilatation and detection of the perforation was less than 24 h in all cases. Non-surgical treatment resulted in a relatively short hospital stay, ranging from 5 to 10 days, and an uneventful recovery in all patients. Based on our experience, endoscopic clipping and/or vacuum therapy are relatively new, valuable, minimally invasive techniques in the management of patients with small, well-defined esophageal tears with contained leakage and should be considered as primary therapeutic option for iatrogenic perforation in achalasia.

Endoscopic devices and techniques for the management of bariatric surgical adverse events (with videos)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

As the prevalence of obesity continues to rise, increasing numbers of patients undergo bariatric surgery. Management of adverse events of bariatric surgery may be challenging and often requires a multidisciplinary approach. Endoscopic intervention is often the first line of therapy for management of these adverse events. This document reviews technologies and techniques used for endoscopic management of adverse events of bariatric surgery, organized by surgery type.

METHODS

The MEDLINE database was searched through May 2018 for articles related to endoscopic management of adverse events of bariatric interventions by using relevant keywords such as adverse events related to "gastric bypass," "sleeve gastrectomy," "laparoscopic adjustable banding," and "vertical banded sleeve gastroplasty," in addition to "endoscopic treatment" and "endoscopic management," among others. Available data regarding efficacy, safety, and financial considerations are summarized.

RESULTS

Common adverse events of bariatric surgery include anastomotic ulcers, luminal stenoses, fistulae/leaks, and inadequate initial weight loss or weight regain. Devices used for endoscopic management of bariatric surgical adverse events include balloon dilators (hydrostatic, pneumatic), mechanical closure devices (clips, endoscopic suturing system, endoscopic plication platform), luminal stents (covered esophageal stents, lumen-apposing metal stents, plastic stents), and thermal therapy (argon plasma coagulation, needle-knives), among others. Available data, composed mainly of case series and retrospective cohort studies, support the primary role of endoscopic management. Multiple procedures and techniques are often required to achieve clinical success, and existing management algorithms are evolving.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopy is a less invasive alternative for management of adverse events of bariatric surgery and for revisional procedures. Endoscopic procedures are frequently performed in the context of multidisciplinary management with bariatric surgeons and interventional radiologists. Treatment algorithms and standards of practice for endoscopic management will continue to be refined as new dedicated technology and data emerge.

Role of Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy as a Treatment for Anastomosis Leak after Esophageal Cancer Surgery

Esophageal anastomotic leak is the most common and serious complication following esophagectomy. However, the standard treatment for anastomotic leaks remains unclear. Recently, endoscopic vacuum therapy has become an important non-surgical alternative treatment method for patients with esophageal anastomotic leak. This treatment involves the endoscopic placement of a sponge connected to a nasogastric tube into the defect cavity or lumen. Subsequently, continuous negative pressure is delivered to the cavity through the tube. Several studies have reported a treatment success rate of 80% to 100%. In this study, we review the mechanism of action, the method of performing the procedure, its safety and efficacy, and prognostic factors for failure of endoscopic vacuum therapy in the management of patients with anastomotic leak, and on this basis attempted to confirm the possibility of establishing a standardized treatment protocol using endoscopic vacuum therapy.

Safety and efficacy of endoscopic vacuum therapy for the treatment of perforations and anastomotic leaks of the upper gastrointestinal tract

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) in the management of perforations and anastomotic leaks of the upper gastrointestinal tract.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study which included patients who underwent EVT due to any upper gastrointestinal defect between April 2017 and February 2019 in three Spanish Hospitals. To this end, we used the only medical device approved to date for endoscopic use (Eso-SPONGEr; B. Braun Melsungen AG, Melsungen, Germany).

RESULTS

11 patients were referred for EVT of an anastomotic leak after esophagectomy (n=7), gastrectomy (n=2), esophageal perforation secondary to endoscopic Zenker's septomiotomy (n=1) and Boerhaave syndrome (n=1). The median size of the cavity was 8×3cm. The median delay between surgery and EVT was 7 days. The median of EVT duration was 28 days. The median number of sponges used was 7 and the mean period replacement was 3.7 days. In 10 cases (91%), the defect was successfully closed. In 9 cases (82%) clinical resolution of the septic condition was achieved. 5 patients presented some adverse event: 3 anastomotic strictures, 1 retropharyngeal pain and 1 case of new-onset pneumonia. The median hospital stay from the start of EVT was 45 days. 1 patient died owing to septic complications secondary to the anastomotic leak.

CONCLUSION

EVT was successful in over 90% of perforations and anastomotic leaks of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Moreover, this is a safe therapy with only mild adverse events associated.

Management of Complications After Esophagectomy

Esophagectomy is a complex operation with many potential complications. Early recognition of postoperative complications allows for the best chance for patient survival. Diagnosis and management of conduit complications, including leak, necrosis, and conduit-airway fistulae, are reviewed. Other common complications, such as chylothorax and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, also are discussed.

A large anastomotic leakage after esophageal surgery treated with endoluminal vacuum-assisted closure: a case report

The treatment of anastomotic post-esophagectomy leaks and fistula is challenging. Endoluminal vacuum-assisted closure (EVAC) is an emerging technique that employs negative pressure wound therapy to treat anastomotic leaks endoscopically. Esosponge is specifically designed for esophageal EVAC therapy. We report on a 49-year-old woman who underwent a totally mini-invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy and developed a giant postoperative leak with a complex pleural collection, but she was not fit for surgical re-intervention. The patient healed almost completely after 14 exchange sessions of Esosponge over 35 days.

Role of endoscopic vacuum therapy in the management of gastrointestinal transmural defects

A gastrointestinal (GI) transmural defect is defined as total rupture of the GI wall, and these defects can be divided into three categories: perforations, leaks, and fistulas. Surgical management of these defects is usually challenging and may be associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Recently, several novel endoscopic techniques have been developed, and endoscopy has become a first-line approach for therapy of these conditions. The use of endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) is increasing with favorable results. This technique involves endoscopic placement of a sponge connected to a nasogastric tube into the defect cavity or lumen. This promotes healing via five mechanisms, including macrodeformation, microdeformation, changes in perfusion, exudate control, and bacterial clearance, which is similar to the mechanisms in which skin wounds are treated with commonly employed wound vacuums. EVT can be used in the upper GI tract, small bowel, biliopancreatic regions, and lower GI tract, with variable success rates and a satisfactory safety profile. In this article, we review and discuss the mechanism of action, materials, techniques, efficacy, and safety of EVT in the management of patients with GI transmural defects.

Endoscopic vacuum therapy for postoperative esophageal leak

Background

Anastomotic leak is the most common and serious complication following esophagectomy. Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure (EVAC) is a promising method for treating anastomotic leak. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of EVAC and to identify factors associated with longer treatment duration for esophageal anastomotic leak following esophagectomy for cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 20 esophageal cancer patients who had undergone EVAC for anastomotic leak after esophagectomy. The efficacy and success rates were evaluated and factors associated with longer treatment duration (≥ 21 days) were identified.

Results

All 20 patients were male. Of these, 10 (50.0%) received neoadjuvant treatment and 6 (30.0%) had one or more comorbidities. The median size of fistula opening was 1.75 cm. During a median of 14.5 days of EVAC treatment, a median of 5 interventions were performed. Treatment success was achieved in 19 patients (95.0%). Neoadjuvant treatment was significantly associated with longer EVAC treatment. There was a non-significant trend toward the need for longer treatment duration for a larger fistula opening size.

Conclusions

EVAC treatment is a good non-surgical option for anastomotic leak following esophagectomy. Long duration of treatment is associated with neoadjuvant treatment and a large leakage opening.

Long-Term Quality of Life Assessment After Successful Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy of Defects in the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Quality of Life After EVT

BACKGROUND

Accumulating evidence indicates that anastomotic leakages and perforations of the upper gastrointestinal tract (uGIT) can be treated successfully with endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT). So far, no data is available regarding the long-term quality of life (QoL) after successful EVT of defects in the uGIT.

METHODS

We present a prospective survey on long-term Qol of 52 patients treated by EVT for defects of the uGIT. Results are compared with 63 of 221 patients treated by esophagectomy without anastomotic insufficiency (w/o EVT) between 12/2011 and 12/2015. The Gastrointestinal Quality of Life-Index (GIQLI) score was determined by a 36-item questionnaire of 25 respondents with EVT and 50 respondents w/o EVT.

RESULTS

The response rate was 78.95% (75/95) including 25 survey respondents who were treated with EVT for anastomotic insufficiency secondary to esophagectomy or gastrectomy (n = 19), iatrogenic esophageal perforation (n = 4), and Boerhaave syndrome (n = 2) and 50 respondents with complication-free esophagectomy w/o EVT. The median follow-up was 19 months for EVT patients and 21 months for patients w/o EVT. Except for "social function" (p = 0.009) in favor for patients w/o EVT, the median GIQLI score did not differ significantly between both study groups concerning the categories 'symptoms', 'emotions', 'physical functions', and 'medical treatment' resulting in a total median GIQLI score of 83 in EVT versus 96.5 in patients w/o EVT (p = 0.185). Spearman Rho analysis revealed that a high GIQLI score correlated with a low ASA score (p < 0.001), a benign pathology (p = 0.001), and a hospital stay less than 21 days (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

EVT in the uGIT is well tolerated by the patients and accompanied by a satisfactory long-term QoL.

Self-Expanding Metal Stents Versus Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy in Anastomotic Leak Treatment After Oncologic Gastroesophageal Surgery

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leak after gastroesophageal surgery is a life-threatening complication. Self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) implantation or endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) have been established as alternatives to reoperation. This study compares the outcome of both interventions for anastomotic leak clinical management.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we identified all patients who received SEMS or EVT for anastomotic leaks after oncological gastroesophageal surgery between January 2007 and December 2016. Only patients with type II leaks according to the Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group were included. Sealing rates, intervention-related complications, demographic characteristics, clinical history, leak characteristics, therapy duration, and in-hospital mortality were analyzed.

RESULTS

One hundred eleven patients who received SEMS (n = 76) or EVT (n = 35) were identified and categorized by primary and final treatment. The overall closure rate in the final treatment analysis was 85.7% for EVT and 72.4% for SEMS (p = 0.152). ICU stay ranged from 0 to 60 days (median 6 days) for EVT and from 0 to 295 days (median 9 days) for SEMS (p = 0.704). EVT patients were hospitalized for 19-119 days (median 39 days) and SEMS patients for 13-296 days (median 37 days; p = 0.812). Demographic factors, comorbidities, and surgical parameters did not correlate with treatment or treatment success.

CONCLUSIONS

SEMS and EVT show comparable results for anastomotic leak management after oncologic gastroesophageal surgery. No superior outcome could be found for either one of the two treatments options.

Endoluminal Therapies for Esophageal Perforations and Leaks

Esophageal perforation has historically been a devastating condition resulting in high morbidity and mortality. The use of endoluminal therapies to treat esophageal leaks and perforations has grown exponentially over the last decade and offers many advantages over traditional surgical intervention in the appropriate circumstances. New interventional endoscopic techniques, including endoscopic clips, covered metal stents, and endoluminal vacuum therapy, have been developed over the last several years to manage esophageal perforation in an attempt to decrease the related morbidity and mortality.

Treatment of Complicated Anal Fistula by an Endofistular Polyurethane-Sponge Vacuum Therapy: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Treatment of supra- and transsphincteric anal fistulas remains a clinical challenge because current treatment results are variable and potentially endanger sphincter function.

OBJECTIVE

Based on positive results of endoluminal polyurethane-sponge vacuum therapy in the upper and lower GI tract, a new system for endofistular vacuum therapy was developed for anal fistulas to utilize vacuum therapy to remove the endofistular pseudoepithelium and to induce granulation in the fistula tract.

DESIGN

This study is based on a prospective case series.

PATIENTS

Seven patients with complicated anal fistulas (3 associated with Crohn's disease and 4 of cryptoglandular origin) longer than 4 cm were treated. Initially, the fistula was curettaged and the first endofistular vacuum therapy sponge was positioned in the fistula tract. The inner fistula opening was closed by suture. A 125 mm Hg constant vacuum was applied to the sponge, and the endofistular vacuum therapy sponge was changed a median of 3 (3-5) times after each 48 to 72 hours of constant vacuum therapy. After final removal, the fistulas were reevaluated every other week for 3 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The main outcome measured was the closure of the fistula.

RESULTS

All patients tolerated the therapy well and no adverse events were observed. Fistula tract closure was demonstrated within 4 weeks after the termination of vacuum therapy. One patient with cryptoglandular fistula developed a recurrence within the follow-up of 3 months.

LIMITATIONS

This was an observational study that had no control arm.

CONCLUSION

In this pilot case series, the results are encouraging. Because endoluminal vacuum therapy would be a new and sphincter-sparing therapy, this concept warrants further investigation in controlled trials.

Oesophagectomy: The expanding role of minimally invasive surgery in oesophageal cancer

Historically, open oesophagectomy was the gold standard for oesophageal cancer surgery. This was associated with a relatively higher morbidity. In the last two decades, we have seen significant improvements in short and long term outcomes due to centralisation of oesophagectomy, multidisciplinary approach, enhanced recovery after surgery programmes, neoadjuvant treatments and advances in minimally invasive oesophagectomy (MIO) techniques. MIO has significantly reduced postoperative morbidity and improved functional recovery, while maintaining comparable long-term oncological outcomes. MIO is technically demanding, and requires a long learning curve. However, it has been proven to be safe and successful in expert centres. This is a review on the current role of MIO in the management of oesophageal cancer.

Surgical management of early and late esophageal perforation

Introduction

Esophageal perforation is a rare and life-threating problem with a 10%–40% mortality rate. Early diagnosis and treatment are important for prevention of complications. Strategies for treatment of esophageal perforation have been controversial for many years, especially in cases of late presentation.

Methods

We prospectively studied 27 patients (12 male, 17 female, mean age 42.7 ± 17.8 years) who presented with esophageal perforation from 1996 to 2015, and evaluated the results of surgical treatment. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to time of presentation: early (<24 h), intermediate (24–72 h), and late (>72 h). We also considered the etiology and site of esophageal perforation, complications, and mortality.

Results

Surgery was performed in 5 patients in the early group, 7 in the moderate group, and 15 in the late group. Primary repair was carried out in 5 cases, primary repair and reinforcement with a flap in 10, esophageal resection and reconstruction in 8, and a T-tube stent was used in 4. Four patients developed a fistula postoperatively, and there was one death due to respiratory failure. No relationship was found between complications and the cause of perforation, time of presentation, or type of treatment.

Conclusion

In patients without sepsis, primary repair can be an option even in those presenting late after esophageal perforation, with an acceptable result.

Endoluminal Vacuum Therapy (E-Vac): A Treatment Option in Oesophagogastric Surgery

Background

Leaks from the upper gastrointestinal tract often pose a management challenge, particularly when surgical treatment has failed or is impossible. Vacuum therapy has revolutionised the treatment of wounds, and its role in enabling and accelerating healing is now explored in oesophagogastric surgery.

Methods

A piece of open cell foam is sutured around the distal end of a nasogastric tube using a silk suture. Under general anaesthetic, the foam covered tip is placed endoscopically through the perforation and into any extra-luminal cavity. Continuous negative pressure (125 mmHg) is then applied. Re-evaluation with change of the negative pressure system is performed every 48–72 h depending on the clinical condition. Patients are fed enterally and treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics and anti-fungal medication until healing, assessed endoscopically and/or radiologically, is complete.

Results

Since April 2011, twenty one patients have been treated. The cause of the leak was postoperative/iatrogenic complications (14 patients) and ischaemic/spontaneous perforation (seven patients). Twenty patients (95%) completed treatment successfully with healing of the defect and/or resolution of the cavity and were subsequently discharged from our care. One patient died from sepsis related to an oesophageal leak after withdrawing consent for further intervention following a single endoluminal vacuum (E-Vac) treatment. In addition, two patients who were successfully treated with E-Vac for their leak subsequently died within 90 days of E-Vac treatment from complications that were not associated with the E-Vac procedure. In two patients, E-Vac treatment was complicated by bleeding. The median number of E-Vac changes was 7 (range 3–12), and the median length of hospital stay was 35 days (range 23–152).

Conclusions

E-Vac therapy is a safe and effective treatment for upper gastrointestinal leaks and should be considered alongside more established therapies. Further research is now needed to understand the mechanism of action and to improve the ease with which E-Vac therapy can be delivered.

Endoscopic Vacuum-Assisted Closure Therapy in Patients with Anastomotic Leakage after Esophagectomy: A Single-Center Experience

Aim

To study the efficacy of E-VAC therapy for patients with anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy.

Methods

Between January 2013 and April 2017, 12 patients underwent E-VAC therapy for the management of postoperative leakage. Their clinical features and endoscopic procedure details, therapy results, adverse events, and survival were investigated.

Results

All 12 patients were male and the median age was 57 years (interquartile range 51.5–62.8 years). The reasons for esophageal surgery were esophageal cancer (83.3%), gastrointestinal stromal tumor (8.3%), and esophageal diverticulum (8.3%). Prior to E-VAC therapy, 6 patients had undergone failed primary surgical repair and the median duration from esophagectomy to leakage discovery was 13.5 days (IQR 6–207 days). The median duration of E-VAC therapy was 25 days (IQR 13.5–34.8 days) and the average sponge exchange rate was 2.7 times during the treatment period. After E-VAC therapy, 8 patients (66.7%) had complete leakage closure, 3 (25%) had a decreased leakage size, and 1 (8.3%) was unchanged. The three patients with a decreased leakage size after E-VAC therapy were treated with endoscopic and conservative management without further surgery.

Conclusion

With proper patient selection, E-VAC therapy is a feasible and safe method for the treatment of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy.

Esophageal Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy with Enteral Feeding Using a Sengstaken-Blakemore Tube

Early diagnosis followed by primary repair is the best treatment for spontaneous esophageal perforation. However, the appropriate management of esophageal leakage after surgical repair is still controversial. Recently, the successful adaptation of vacuum-assisted closure therapy, which is well established for the treatment of chronic surface wounds, has been demonstrated for esophageal perforation or leakage. Conservative treatment methods require long-term fasting with total parenteral nutrition or enteral feeding through invasive procedures, such as percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy or a feeding jejunostomy. We report 2 cases of esophageal leakage after primary repair treated by endoscopic vacuum therapy with continuous enteral feeding using a Sengstaken-Blakemore tube.

Use of a novel technique to manage gastrointestinal leaks with endoluminal negative pressure: a single institution experience

BACKGROUND

Perforations and anastomotic leaks of the gastrointestinal tract are severe complications, which carry high morbidity and mortality and management of these is a multi-disciplinary challenge. The use of endoluminal vacuum (EVAC) therapy has recently proven to be a useful technique to manage these complications. We report our institution's experience with this novel technique in the chest, abdomen, and pelvis.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of an IRB approved registry of all EVAC therapy patients from July 2013 to December 2016. A total of 55 patients were examined and 49 patients were eligible for inclusion: 15 esophageal, 21 gastric, 3 small bowel, and 10 colorectal defects. The primary endpoint was closure rate of the GI tract defect with EVAC therapy.

RESULTS

Fifteen (100%) esophageal defects closed with EVAC therapy. Mean duration of therapy was 27 days consisting of an average of 6 endosponge changes every 4.8 days. Eighteen (86%) gastric defects closed with EVAC therapy. Mean duration of therapy was 38 days with a mean of 9 endosponge changes every 5.3 days. Three (100%) small bowel defects closed with EVAC therapy. Mean duration of therapy was 13.7 days with a mean of 2.7 endosponge changes every 4.4 days. Six (60%) colorectal defects closed with EVAC therapy. Mean duration of therapy was 23.2 days, consisting of a mean of 6 endosponge changes every 4.0 days. There were two deaths, which were not directly related to EVAC therapy and occurred outside the measured 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSION

Our experience demonstrates that EVAC therapy is feasible and effective for the management of gastrointestinal perforations/leaks throughout the GI tract and can be considered as a safe alternative to surgical intervention in select cases.

Long-term quality of life after endovac-therapy in anastomotic leakages after esophagectomy

Background

Endoluminal vacuum therapy (EVT) has been successfully established with promising survival rates in the treatment of anastomotic leakages after esophagectomy. It is still unclear how this therapy affects health related quality of life (HRQOL).

Methods

HRQOL was prospectively assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) questionnaire. Assessment was carried out prior to surgery, after discharge, 6 months and 12 months after surgery. We compared HRQOL after EVT (n=23) to patients without anastomotic leakages as a control group (n=50). Investigated parameters included age, sex, and localization of anastomosis, number of EVT sessions, length of ICU and hospital stay, therapy failure, anastomotic stricture, tumour stage, neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment, sepsis.

Results

After esophagectomy HRQOL increased within 12 months. Compared to patients without leakages the EVT-group showed significantly better HRQOL-scores for pain, social and emotional functioning after discharge and 6 months after surgery. In the long-term follow up HRQOL was comparable between the groups. After EVT age, advanced tumour stage, tumour recurrence, anastomotic strictures, length of ICU and hospital stay and length of EVT had a significant influence on HRQOL.

Conclusions

EVT is a promising therapeutic option in leakages after esophagectomy. In the long-term, HRQOL of EVT-treated patients is comparable to patients, who did not suffer from postsurgical leakages.

Fully robotic da Vinci Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in four-arm technique-problems and solutions

The aim of this technical note is a step-by-step description of a fully robotic abdominothoracic esophagectomy with an intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy. We report on our technique and short-term results of 75 patients undergoing an Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy using a fully robotic 4-arm approach in the abdominal and thoracic phase with a hand-sewn intrathoracic anastomosis. There are several important steps and differences to consider compared to the conventional minimal invasive approach (patient's positioning, anaesthesiological set up, port placement, gastric conduit pull up, technique of esophagostrostomy). Mean operative time was 392 minutes (240-610) with a 94% R0 resection status. Conversion to open procedure occurred in 2 (2.6%) in the abdominal, and 14 (18.2%) in the thoracic phase. Main reasons for conversion were problems during the lifting of the gastric conduit and difficulties in the construction of the esophagogastrostomy. The rate dropped during the last 20 patients (1/20 (10%). Our results suggest that the reported technique is safe and feasible. It satisfies the oncological principles and provides the advantages of robotic assisted minimal invasive surgery.