Minimally invasive spinal surgery using nucleoplasty and the Dekompressor tool: a comparison of two methods in a one year follow-up

Fixed versus Adjustable differential pressure valves in case of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus treated with ventriculoperitoneal shunt. A systematic review and meta-analysis of proportion

INTRODUCTION

Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus is a common cause of communicating hydrocephalus in adult age, presenting with classic Hakim-Adam's triad. Ventriculoperitoneal shunting is the treatment of choice in these cases. The main objective of this study is to compare the complication rate of Adjustable differential pressure valves with fixed differential pressure valves in these cases.

LITERATURE SEARCH

We systematically searched PubMed/Medline, Embase, LILACS, and ClinicalTrials.gov from their date of inception to 30th Jan 2023. We included observational studies, Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), and comparative and noncomparative studies in the search. The literature search resulted in 1394 studies, and only 22 studies were eligible to be included in the meta-analysis. We performed the meta-analysis of proportion to compare incidence rates by performing a Freeman-turkey double arcsine transformation.

RESULTS

The summary of the proportions of the incidence rate of complications was less for Adjustable Differential Pressure Valves (ADPV) as compared to Fixed Differential Pressure Valves (FDVP) but the confidence intervals overlapped. The summary proportion of surgical revision of shunt in the case of ADPV was 0.081 (95% CI (0.047, 0.115)), and in the case of FDPV was 0.173 (95% CI (0.047, 0.299)). Similarly, the summary proportion of subdural fluid collection in the case of ADPV was 0.090 (0.058, 0.122), and in the case of FDPV was 0.204 (0.132, 0.277). The incidence of complication was low in population implanted with DPV along with gravitational or anti-siphon unit (GASU).

CONCLUSION

Complication rates in the case of ADPV plus GASU were the lowest. Though the summary proportion of complication rate in the case of ADPV was low as compared to FDPV, the statistical significance of this difference is doubted due to overlapping confidence intervals.

Overview on Percutaneous Therapies of Disc Diseases

Low back pain is an extremely common pathology affecting a great share of the population, in particular, young adults. Many structures can be responsible for pain such as intervertebral discs, facet joints, nerve roots, and sacroiliac joints. This review paper focuses on disc pathology and the percutaneous procedures available to date for its treatment. For each option, we will assess the indications, technical aspects, advantages, and complications, as well as outcomes reported in the literature and new emerging trends in the field.

The Frequency of Resurgery after Percutaneous Lumbar Surgery Using Dekompressor in a Ten-Year Period

To prevent open surgical procedures, minimally invasive techniques, like Dekompressor (PLDD), have been developed. The absence of reherniation is an important factor correlating with clinical success after lumbar surgery. In this retrospective, observational study, the frequency of additional open surgery after PLDD in a long time retrospective was examined. The correlation between clinical symptoms and outcome was assessed, and the time between PLDD and open surgery was analyzed. Consecutive patients after PLDD between 2005 and 2007 were included. MacNab's outcome criteria were used to evaluate patient satisfaction. The need for additional open surgery of the lumbar spine, the period between Dekompressor and resurgery, and the treated levels were analyzed. In total, 73 patients were included in this study. The patients were seen one month after PLDD. The majority of patients (76.7%) had additional radicular pain. The most common level treated was L4-5 (58.9%). The follow-up time was longer than 5 years in 30.1% of the patients and longer than 10 years in 6.82%. The short-term success rate was 67.1%. Additional surgery was performed in 26.0% of patients, with 78.9% of the reoperations undertaken during the first year after PLDD. These patients had a statistically significant worse outcome (P = 0.025). Radicular pain was present in all patients with an early subsequent surgery, but only in 50% of patients with late surgery (P = 0.035). Significantly more patients with poor pain relief had radicular pain (P = 0.04). The short-term success rate was worsened by a resurgery rate of 26.0%. Subsequent surgery, a short time after PLDD, suggests that PLDD is not a replacement for open discectomy. Because patients with radicular pain had a worse outcome and more frequent resurgeries, whether radicular pain is an ideal indication for PLDD should be discussed.

Image guided percutaneous spine procedures using an optical see-through head mounted display: proof of concept and rationale

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Optical see-through head mounted displays (OST-HMDs) offer a mixed reality (MixR) experience with unhindered procedural site visualization during procedures using high resolution radiographic imaging. This technical note describes our preliminary experience with percutaneous spine procedures utilizing OST-HMD as an alternative to traditional angiography suite monitors.

METHODS

MixR visualization was achieved using the Microsoft HoloLens system. Various spine procedures (vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty, and percutaneous discectomy) were performed on a lumbar spine phantom with commercially available devices. The HMD created a real time MixR environment by superimposing virtual posteroanterior and lateral views onto the interventionalist's field of view. The procedures were filmed from the operator's perspective. Videos were reviewed to assess whether key anatomic landmarks and materials were reliably visualized. Dosimetry and procedural times were recorded. The operator completed a questionnaire following each procedure, detailing benefits, limitations, and visualization mode preferences.

RESULTS

Percutaneous vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty, and discectomy procedures were successfully performed using OST-HMD image guidance on a lumbar spine phantom. Dosimetry and procedural time compared favorably with typical procedural times. Conventional and MixR visualization modes were equally effective in providing image guidance, with key anatomic landmarks and materials reliably visualized.

CONCLUSION

This preliminary study demonstrates the feasibility of utilizing OST-HMDs for image guidance in interventional spine procedures. This novel visualization approach may serve as a valuable adjunct tool during minimally invasive percutaneous spine treatment.

Ozone injection with or without percutaneous microdiscectomy for treatment of cervical disc herniation

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study compared the efficacy of combined percutaneous ozone injection and percutaneous discectomyto percutaneous ozone injection alone for the treatment of cervical disc herniation.

METHODS

Patients with cervical disc herniation who were enrolled in our hospital from October 2010 to June 2015 were divided into two groups: 1) treated with percutaneous ozone injection alone (control; n= 19); and 2) those treated with combined ozone injection and percutaneous microdiscectomy (combined treatment; n= 28). The efficacy of the combined treatment was evaluated relative to the control by visual analogue scale (VAS) and the modified Macnab standard. Effective treatment was defined as excellent or good, and ineffective as fair or poor.

RESULTS

No major complications occurred in either group. For the control group, the VAS scores dropped from 6.75 ± 2.34 before surgery to 2.78 ± 1.85 immediately after surgery, and to 4.18 ± 1.46 during the follow-ups. For patients who received the combined treatment, the VAS scores were 7.12 ± 2.03 before surgery, 3.86 ± 2.87 immediately after surgery, and 3.27 ± 1.53 during the follow-ups. At the 6-month follow-up, 73.7% (14 from 19 patients) in the control group and 89.2% (25 from 28 patients) in the treatment group were judged to have received effective treatment. Difference in efficacy between two groups of treatment was statistically significant (P= 0.033).

CONCLUSION

The rate of effective treatment in patients who received combined percutaneous microdiscectomy and ozone injection was higher than that of patients who received ozone injection alone. Combination of percutaneous microdiscectomy and ozone injection might be an effective method to treat patients with cervical disk hernia.

Plasma disc decompression compared to physiotherapy for symptomatic contained lumbar disc herniation: A prospective randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate clinical outcomes with PDD as compared with patients who underwent to standard physiotherapy intervention.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

One-hundred-seventy-seven randomly assigned patients with primarily radicular pain associated with a single-level lumbar contained disc herniation were enrolled. Participants received either PDD (89 patients) or conservative physiotherapy care (88 patients).

RESULTS

Patients in the PDD group had significantly greater reduction in leg pain scores and significantly improved VAS (p<0.001), Oswestry Disability Index (p<0.05), and 36-Item Short Form, than those in the physiotherapy group at 12 months. On subset analysis, patients achieved even better outcomes after PPD who: were younger, had a shorter period of radiculopathy, of male gender, and lower BMI. Patients with subacute pain reported better outcomes than those with chronic pain in the PDD group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient selection for PDD over physiotherapy favored younger patients who presented with a shorter period of pain symptoms and who had a more favorable body habitus.

Efficacy of coblation annuloplasty in discogenic low back pain: a prospective observational study

In degenerative disc, the innervated outer annulus is confirmed to the major origin resulted in discogenic pain. To alleviate the discogenic pain, annuloplasty with electrothermal technology was proved to be effective, which mainly involves the thermal heating of the annulus to denature collagen fibers and denervate posterior annular nerve fibers. However, little is known that efficacy of annuloplasty with coblation technology in treating discogenic pain through directly interrupting nerves in outer annulus.The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of coblation annuloplasty for the treatment of discogenic low back pain.In a clinical prospective observational study, 17 consecutive patients with discogenic low back pain underwent coblation annuloplasty under local anesthesia. Pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, patient responses stating significant (≥50%) pain relief, and modified MacNab criteria were adopted to evaluate the pain intensity, degree of pain relief, and functional status after 6 months of follow-up.The preoperative pain VAS score was 6.5 ± 0.8(95% confidence interval [CI] 6.1-6.9) and the pain VAS score decreased to 2.9 ± 1.6 (95% CI 2.1-3.8), 2.9 ± 1.7 (95% CI 2.1-3.8), 3.2 ± 1.6 (95% CI 2.4-4.1), 3.2 ± 1.7 (95% CI 2.4-4.2) at 1 week and 1, 3 and 6 month postoperatively, respectively. 12 (70.6%), 11 (64.7%), 10 (58.8%) and 10 (58.8%) of patients reported significant pain relief at 1 week and 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. At 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively, the numbers of patients with "excellent" or "good" ratings were 13 (76.5%), 11 (64.7%), and 10 (58.8%) according to the modified MacNab criteria. No serious complications were observed.The finds show that coblation annuloplasty is an effective, safe, and less uncomfortable procedure in managing discogenic low back pain.

The comparison of the efficacy of radiofrequency nucleoplasty and targeted disc decompression in lumbar radiculopathy

Chronic low back pain is a common clinical condition causing medical, socioeconomic, and treatment difficulties. In our study, we aimed to compare early and long-term efficacy of lumbar radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFTC) nucleoplasty and targeted disc decompression (TDD) in patients with lumbar radiculopathy in whom previous conventional therapy had failed. The medical records of 37 patients undergoing TDD and 36 patients undergoing lumbar RFTC nucleoplasty were retrospectively examined and assigned to the Group D and Group N, respectively. In all patients Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Functional Rating Index (FRI) were recorded before treatment and after one, six and twelve months after the procedure. The North American Spine Society Satisfaction Scale (NASSSS) was also recoreded twelve months after the therapeutic procedure. Statistically significant postprocedural improvement in VAS and FRI was evident in both groups. VAS scores after one, six, and twelve month were slightly higher in Group N, compared to Group D. The overall procedure-related patient satisfaction ratio was 67.5% in the Group D, compared to 75% in the Group N. Regardless of the different mechanism of action, both methods are effective therapies for lumbar radiculopathy, with TDD showing long-term lower pain scores.

Minimally invasive surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Assessing the benefits of surgical treatments for sciatica is critical for clinical and policy decision-making. To compare minimally invasive (MI) and conventional microdiscectomy (MD) for patients with sciatica due to lumbar disc herniation.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials including patients with sciatica due to lumbar disc herniation. Conventional microdiscectomy was compared separately with: (1) Interlaminar MI discectomy (ILMI vs. MD); (2) Transforaminal MI discectomy (TFMI vs. MD).

OUTCOMES

Back pain, leg pain, function, improvement, work status, operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, complications, reoperations, analgesics and cost outcomes were extracted and risk of bias assessed. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using random effect meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine studies, 16 RCTs and 13 non-randomised studies (n = 4,472), were included. Clinical outcomes were not different between the surgery types. There is low quality evidence that ILMI takes 11 min longer, results in 52 ml less blood loss and reduces mean length of hospital stay by 1.5 days. There were no differences in complications or reoperations. The main limitations were high risk of bias, low number of studies and small sample sizes comparing TF with MD.

CONCLUSIONS

There is moderate to low quality evidence of no differences in clinical outcomes between MI surgery and conventional microdiscectomy for patients with sciatica due to lumbar disc herniation. Studies comparing transforaminal MI with conventional surgery with sufficient sample size and methodological robustness are lacking.

Minimally invasive surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Assessing the benefits of surgical treatments for sciatica is critical for clinical and policy decision-making. To compare minimally invasive (MI) and conventional microdiscectomy (MD) for patients with sciatica due to lumbar disc herniation.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials including patients with sciatica due to lumbar disc herniation. Conventional microdiscectomy was compared separately with: (1) Interlaminar MI discectomy (ILMI vs. MD); (2) Transforaminal MI discectomy (TFMI vs. MD).

OUTCOMES

Back pain, leg pain, function, improvement, work status, operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, complications, reoperations, analgesics and cost outcomes were extracted and risk of bias assessed. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using random effect meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine studies, 16 RCTs and 13 non-randomised studies (n = 4,472), were included. Clinical outcomes were not different between the surgery types. There is low quality evidence that ILMI takes 11 min longer, results in 52 ml less blood loss and reduces mean length of hospital stay by 1.5 days. There were no differences in complications or reoperations. The main limitations were high risk of bias, low number of studies and small sample sizes comparing TF with MD.

CONCLUSIONS

There is moderate to low quality evidence of no differences in clinical outcomes between MI surgery and conventional microdiscectomy for patients with sciatica due to lumbar disc herniation. Studies comparing transforaminal MI with conventional surgery with sufficient sample size and methodological robustness are lacking.

Publication patterns of comparative effectiveness research in spine neurosurgery

OBJECT

The purpose of this study was to investigate publication patterns for comparative effectiveness research (CER) on spine neurosurgery.

METHODS

The authors searched the PubMed database for the period 1980-2012 using the key words "cost analysis," "utility analysis," "cost-utility," "outcomes research," "practical clinical research," "comparator trial," and "comparative effectiveness research," linked with "effectiveness" and "spine neurosurgery."

RESULTS

From 1980 through April 9, 2012, neurosurgery CER publications accounted for 1.38% of worldwide CER publications (8657 of 626,330 articles). Spine neurosurgery CER accounted for only 0.02%, with 132 articles. The journal with the greatest number of publications on spine neurosurgery CER was Spine, followed by the Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. The average annual publication rate for spine neurosurgery CER during this period was 4 articles (132 articles in 33 years), with 68 (51.52%) of the 132 articles being published within the past 5 years and a rising trend beginning in 2008. The top 3 contributing countries were the US, Turkey, and Japan, with 68, 8, and 7 articles, respectively. Only 8 regular articles (6.06%) focused on cost analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a paucity of publications using CER methodology in spine neurosurgery. Few articles address the issue of cost analysis. The promotion of continuing medical education in CER methodology is warranted. Further investigations to address cost analysis in comparative effectiveness studies of spine neurosurgery are crucial to expand the application of CER in public health.

Percutaneous intradiscal high-pressure injection of saline and lidocaine in patients with lumbar intervertebral disc extrusion

The intradiscal high-pressure injection of saline and lidocaine (IDHP) is a minimally invasive percutaneous procedure for a lumbar intervertebral disc extrusion. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of IDHP in terms of pain relief, reduction of disability, and risk of complications. Thirty patients with primarily radicular pain due to an extrusion-type disc herniation who underwent IDHP were enrolled in the study. A visual analogue pain scale (VAS) and the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scoring system for the treatment of low back disorders were used at pre-treatment, 2 weeks post-treatment, and 3 months post-treatment. The mean VAS decreased significantly (p < 0.01) from 64.3 mm at pre-treatment to 26.3 mm at 2 weeks post-treatment and 15.5 at 3 months post-treatment. The mean JOA score improved significantly (p < 0.01) from 14.7 to 21.3 at 2 weeks post-treatment and 24.6 at 3 months post-treatment. IDHP appeared to produce significant effects in patients with radicular pain, leading to the improvement of VAS and JOA scores. IDHP appears to be a safe, minimally invasive treatment option for a lumbar intervertebral disc extrusion.