Retrorectal tumors

The management of retrorectal tumors - a single-center analysis of 21 cases and overview of the literature

AIM

Retrorectal tumors are rare and heterogeneous. They are often asymptomatic or present with nonspecific symptoms, making management challenging. This study examines the diagnosis and treatment of retrorectal tumors.

METHODS

Between 2002 and 2022, 21 patients with retrorectal tumors were treated in our department. We analyzed patient characteristics, diagnosis and treatment modalities retrospectively. Additionally, a literature review (2002-2023, "retrorectal tumors" and "presacral tumors", 20 or more cases included) was performed.

RESULTS

Of the 21 patients (median age 54 years, 62% female), 17 patients (81%) suffered from benign lesions and 4 (19%) from malignant lesions. Symptoms were mostly nonspecific, with pain being the most common (11/21 (52%)). Diagnosis was incidental in eight cases. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 20 (95%) and biopsy was obtained in 10 (48%). Twenty patients underwent surgery, mostly via a posterior approach (14/20 (70%)). At a mean follow-up of 42 months (median 10 months, range 1-166 months), the local recurrence rate was 19%. There was no mortality. Our Pubmed search identified 39 publications.

CONCLUSION

Our data confirms the significant heterogeneity of retrorectal tumors, which poses a challenge to management, especially considering the often nonspecific symptoms. Regarding diagnosis and treatment, our data highlights the importance of MRI and surgical resection. In particular a malignancy rate of almost 20% warrants a surgical resection in case of the findings of a retrorectal tumour. A local recurrence rate of 19% supports the need for follow up.

Endoscopic Resection of Tailgut Cyst

Tailgut cyst or retrorectal cystic hamartoma is a rare congenital lesion, thought to arise from a portion of the embryological hindgut, usually benign, with no or unspecific symptoms, mainly diagnosed in middle-aged women. Complete surgical resection of the cyst is recommended to avoid complications and confirm the diagnosis. In this report, we present our experience in the successful endoscopic management of a tailgut cyst, outlining the endoscopic resection technique and discussing under what conditions this approach may be applicable.

Presacral tumors: A systematic review of literature

Presacral/Retrorectal tumors (RRT) are rare lesions that comprise a multitude of histological types. Data on surgical management are limited to case reports and small case series. The aim of the study was to provide a comprehensive review of the epidemiology, pathological subtypes, surgical approaches, and clinical outcomes. A PubMed search using terms "retrorectal tumor" and "presacral tumor" was used to identify articles reporting RRT of non-urological, non-gynecologic, and non-metastatic origin. Articles included were between 2015 and 2023. A total of 68 studies were included, comprising 570 patients. About 68.2% of patients were female, and the mean overall age of both sexes was 48.6 years. Based on histopathology, 466 patients (81.8%) had benign lesions, and 104 (18.2%) were malignant. In terms of surgical approach, 191 (33.5%) were treated anteriorly, 240 (42.1%) through a posterior approach, and 66 (11.6%) combined. The mean length of stay was 7.6 days. Patients treated using the posterior approach had a shorter length of stay (5.7 days) compared to the anterior and combined approaches. RRT are rare tumors of congenital nature with prevalence among the female sex. R0 resection is crucial in its management, and minimal access surgery appears to be a safer option in appropriate case selection.

Robotic resection of presacral tumors

BACKGROUND

Presacral tumors are a rare entity typically treated with an open surgical approach. A limited number of minimally invasive resections have been described. The aim of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of roboticresection of presacral tumors.

METHODS

This is a retrospective single system analysis, conducted at a quaternary referral academic healthcare system, and included all patients who underwent a robotic excision of a presacral tumor between 2015 and 2023. Outcomes of interest were operative time, estimated blood loss, complications, length of stay, margin status, and recurrence rates.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients (11 females and 5 males) were included. The median age of the cohort was 51 years (range 25-69 years). The median operative time was 197 min (range 98-802 min). The median estimated blood loss was 40 ml, ranging from 0 to 1800 ml, with one patient experiencing conversion to open surgery after uncontrolled hemorrhage. Urinary retention was the only postoperative complication that occurred in three patients (19%) and was solved within 30 days in all cases. The median length of stay was one day (range 1-6 days). The median follow-up was 6.7 months (range 1-110 months). All tumors were excised with appropriate margins, but one benign and one malignant tumor recurred (12.5%). Ten tumors were classified as congenital (one was malignant), two were mesenchymal (both malignant), and five were miscellaneous (one malignant).

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic resection of select presacral pathology is feasible and safe. Further studies must be conducted to determine complication rates, outcomes, and long-term safety profiles.

Surgical outcomes after reoperation for patients with recurrent presacral tumors: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Relevant reports on the surgical resection and prognosis of recurrent presacral tumors are limited. The objective of this study was to explore the outcomes associated with surgical resection of recurrent presacral tumors.

METHODS

The data of patients with recurrent presacral tumors who received surgical resection in our hospital between June 2009 and November 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients, comprising 22 females and 9 males, with recurrent presacral lesions were included in our study. A posterior approach was utilized in 27 patients, an anterior approach in 1 patient, and a combined approach in 3 patients. Intraoperative complications occurred in 13 patients (41.9%), while postoperative complications occurred in 6 patients (19.4%). The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in patients who underwent the posterior approach compared to those who underwent the anterior and combined approaches (P = 0.002). The operative time for the posterior approach was significantly shorter compared to both the anterior and combined approaches (P = 0.006). Temporary tamponade was performed for hemostasis in 4 patients, while staged resection was performed in 2 patients during the surgical treatment process. After a median follow-up period of 115.5 months, 5 patients with recurrent malignant presacral tumors succumbed to tumor recurrence after reoperation in our hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection remains the mainstream treatment for recurrent presacral tumors. The outcomes for recurrent benign presacral tumors after surgery demonstrate favorable results, whereas further enhancements are required to improve the outcomes for recurrent malignant presacral tumors after surgery.

A Case Report of Neuroendocrine Tumor in Presacral Region: How Can It Be Managed? Laparoscopy versus Laparotomy

Presacral or retrorectal tumors are rare, usually asymptomatic, and diagnosed accidentally during physical examination or imaging. Symptomatic tumors may present with perianal pain, bowel dysfunction, and urinary symptoms due to the mass compression or invasion of the surrounding tissues and organs. Surgical resection is the first choice for treating presacral tumors. Clinicians should choose surgical procedures based on the location and size of the tumors. We presented a 43-year-old woman who suffered from pelvic pain and primary infertility from two years ago. A large mass between the posterior vaginal wall and the rectum was found on recto-vaginal examination. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a large 120×115 mm benign multiloculated cystic mass. Eventually, the mass was removed through laparoscopic surgery. The pathology report indicated a carcinoid tumor (grade I) with no lymphovascular invasion. Thus, presacral tumors are resectable through laparoscopy with lower complications than open surgery.

Chinese expert consensus on standardized treatment for presacral cysts

Presacral cysts are cystic or cyst-solid lesions between the sacrum and rectum, almost involving adjacent pelvic floorstructures including sacrococcygeal fascia, rectum, and anal sphincter. Presacral cysts are usually benign, currently believed to arise from aberrant embryogenesis. Presacral cysts are clinically rare and the true incidence is unknown. Surgical resection remains the major treatment for presacral cysts. Unless the cysts are completely resected, recurrence is unavoidable. Recurrent cysts or hard-to-heal sinuses in the sacrococcyx cause patients extreme pain. However, the current knowledge of presacral cysts is insufficient. They are occasionally confused with other diseases such as ovarian cysts and perianal abscesses. Moreover, lack of the correct surgical concept and skills leads to palliative treatment for complex presacral cysts and serious complications such as impairing the function of the anal sphincter or important blood vessels and nerves. The consensus summarizes the opinions and experiences of multidisciplinary experts in presacral cysts and aims to provide clinicians with a more defined concept of the treatment, standardize the surgical approach, and improve the efficacy of presacral cysts.

Cystic lesions of the retrorectal space

Cysts of the retrorectal space comprise a heterogeneous group of rare lesions. Most develop from embryological remnants and include tailgut cysts, dermoid cysts, rectal duplication cysts, anal canal duplication cysts, sacrococcygeal teratomas and anterior meningocoele. Tailgut cyst is the most common cyst of developmental origin, usually presenting as a multilocular cystic mass with mucoid content and lined by multiple epithelial types. Compared with tailgut cysts, rectal duplication cysts display all layers of the large bowel wall including a well-defined muscularis propria. Retrorectal cysts of non-developmental origin are far less common and represent lesions that either infrequently involve the retrorectal space or undergo extensive cystic change. This review provides an overview of the various histological types of cystic lesions of the retrorectal space, divided into cysts of developmental origin and those of non-developmental origin. A practical pathological and multidisciplinary approach to diagnosing these lesions is presented.

The management of retrorectal tumours: tertiary centre retrospective study

AIM

Tumours of the retrorectal space are uncommon, pathologically heterogeneous, and difficult to diagnose, with ongoing controversy over their surgical management. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical management of a consecutive series of patients who had undergone excision of primary retrorectal tumours (PRRTs) at a tertiary referral centre.

METHOD

Patients were identified from a prospectively maintained database between 1 March 2001 and 1 August 2021. Electronic patient records were reviewed for demographics, preoperative imaging, operative details, histology, and follow-up. A chi-squared test was used to assess the statistical significance of findings.

RESULTS

A total of 144 patients were included in the study. Of these, 103 patients were female (71.5 per cent), 46 patients (31.9 per cent) presented incidentally, and 99 of the patients had tumours located below S3 (68.7 per cent). Overall, 76 patients underwent a transperineal approach (52.7 per cent) with the most common findings of a benign tailgut cyst occurring in 59 (40.9 per cent) of cases. Preoperative MRI predicted urovascular and pelvic sidewall involvement assessed intraoperatively with a sensitivity of 83.3 and 90 per cent and a specificity of 98.1 and 98 per cent respectively. Risk of malignancy in solid tumours was 31.4 versus 8.8 per cent in cystic tumours (relative risk 3.5, 95 per cent c.i. 1.6 to 7.6, P < 0.001). Major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade III and above) occurred in eight patients (5.6 per cent) and all-cause long-term mortality was 4.8 per cent (seven patients).

DISCUSSION

PRRTs can be safely excised with minimal complications in specialized centres by surgical teams with the relevant expertise. This study questions the conservative management of cystic tumours and given the risk of solid tumour malignancy, supports surgical management.

Risk factors for perioperative complications in laparoscopic surgeries of retrorectal cystic lesions

BACKGROUND

The incidence of retrorectal lesions is low, and no consensus has been reached regarding the most optimal surgical approach. Laparoscopic approach has the advantage of minimally invasive. The risk factors influencing perioperative complications of laparoscopic surgery are rarely discussed.

AIM

To investigate the risk factors for perioperative complications in laparoscopic surgeries of retrorectal cystic lesions.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent laparoscopic excision of retrorectal cystic lesions between August 2012 and May 2020 at our hospital. All surgeries were performed in the general surgery department. Patients were divided into groups based on the lesion location and diameter. We analysed the risk factors like type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, the history of abdominal surgery, previous treatment, clinical manifestation, operation duration, blood loss, perioperative complications, and readmission rate within 90 d retrospectively.

RESULTS

Severe perioperative complications occurred in seven patients. Prophylactic transverse colostomy was performed in four patients with suspected rectal injury. Two patients underwent puncture drainage due to postoperative pelvic infection. One patient underwent debridement in the operating room due to incision infection. The massive-lesion group had a significantly longer surgery duration, higher blood loss, higher incidence of perioperative complications, and higher readmission rate within 90 d (P < 0.05). Univariate analysis, multivariate analysis, and logistic regression showed that lesion diameter was an independent risk factor for the development of perioperative complications in patients who underwent laparoscopic excision of retrorectal cystic lesions.

CONCLUSION

The diameter of the lesion is an independent risk factor for perioperative complications in patients who undergo laparoscopic excision of retrorectal cystic lesions. The location of the lesion was not a determining factor of the surgical approach. Laparoscopic surgery is minimally invasive, high-resolution, and flexible, and its use in retrorectal cystic lesions is safe and feasible, also for lesions below the S3 level.

Retrorectal tumors: A challenge for the surgeons

Retrorectal or presacral tumors are rare lesions located in the presacral area and considered as being derived from multiple embryological remnants. These tumors are classified as congenital, neurogenic, osseous, inflammatory, or miscellaneous. The most common among these are congenital benign lesions that present with non-specific symptoms, such as lower back pain and change in bowel habit. Although congenital and developmental tumors occur in younger patients, the median age of presentation is reported to be 45 years. Magnetic resonance imaging plays a crucial role in treatment management through accurate diagnosis of the lesion, the evaluation of invasion to adjacent structures, and the decision of appropriate surgical approach. The usefulness of preoperative biopsy is still debated; currently, it is only indicated for solid or heterogeneous tumors if it will alter the treatment management. Surgical resection with clear margins is considered the optimal treatment; described approaches are transabdominal, perineal, combined abdominoperineal, and minimally invasive. Benign retrorectal tumors have favorable long-term outcomes with a low incidence of recurrence, whereas malignant tumors have a potential for distant organ metastasis in addition to local recurrence.

Retrorectal tumor: a single-center 10-years' experience

Purpose

Retrorectal tumors (RTs) are a rare incidence and recommendations on the ideal surgical approaches are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes and follow-up results of patients undergoing excision of RTs at our institution.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted for undergoing surgery for RT between January 2009 and January 2019. Demographic characteristics, presenting symptoms, preoperative diagnostic tests, surgical procedures, histopathological results, intraoperative and postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative 30-day mortality, 90-day unplanned readmission rate, and long-term outcomes were evaluated.

Results

Twenty patients with a mean age of 48.3 ± 14.2 were analyzed. The most common presenting complaint was perineal pain (35.0%). Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography was preferred in 18 and 2 patients, respectively. Tumor localization was below the level of the third sacral vertebrae in 14 patients for whom the posterior surgical approach was used. No postoperative mortality was recorded at the end of follow-up of 53.8 ± 40 months. Mean length of postoperative hospital stay was 8.6 ± 9.4 days. Ten percent of the patients had unplanned hospital readmission within 90 days after discharge. Recurrence developed in 1 patient, for whom pathology were reported as chordoma.

Conclusion

RT should be managed by a multidisciplinary team given the complexity and heterogeneity of these tumors despite the fact that the majority are benign. A good understanding of pelvic anatomy and characterization of lesions through detailed radiological imaging is crucial to optimize surgical planning. Complete surgical resection is key for prolonged disease-free and overall survival of patients diagnosed with RTs.

Successful excision of a retrorectal cyst through trans-sacral approach: A case report

•

Retrorectal cysts are rare congenital cystic lesions commonly seen in middle-aged women.

•

A 38-year-old woman with retrorectal cyst underwent trans-sacral resection.

•

She showed no postoperative complications.

•

Trans-sacral resection provides adequate exposure of the posterior retrorectal cyst.

Introduction

Retrorectal cysts are rare congenital cystic lesions usually diagnosed in middle-aged women. They are generally asymptomatic; however, local pressure may result in complications. Pain or discomfort in the pelvic, sacral, lower back or perianal area are the most common symptoms. The diagnosis is difficult, and multidisciplinary management is required. An epidermoid cyst is the most common type. Surgical resection is the main treatment, and 3 operative approaches are commonly used: abdominal, trans-sacral, and combined abdominosacral. The selection of the approach depends on the nature and location of the lesion. Here, we present a case that demonstrates the trans-sacral approach to a retrorectal cyst is a feasible option in terms of safety and minimal invasiveness for selected patients with this rare type of retrorectal cystic lesion.

Presentation of case

A 38-year-old woman with no comorbidities incidentally showed a retrorectal cyst on magnetic resonance imaging performed during pregnancy. The patient underwent surgical resection under general anesthesia, trans-sacral incision was performed, the posterior rectum exposed, and the cyst removed. No complications were seen in the postoperative period.

Discussion

Posterior trans-sacral resection (Kraske) is preferred for patients with posterior retrorectal cyst because it provides adequate exposure.

Conclusion

Posterior trans-sacral resection allows proximal extension for elimination of the infection and in cases of adherence of the cyst to surrounding structures or in malignancy, which require en bloc resection.

Laparoscopic Resection of a Huge Retrorectal Tumor

Retrorectal space tumors are rare, and so are frequently unrecognized, misdiagnosed, and mistreated. A 57-year-old man visited the outpatient clinic with the chief complaints of thin stool and lower pelvic heaviness. A smooth, round huge palpable mass on the right posterolateral rectal wall was detected and pelvic computed tomography showed a 7.8-cm cystic lesion in the right retrorectal space. Laparoscopic procedures were initiated with perirectal dissection for rectal mobilization. After fixation of the peritoneum and tying the rectum for intracorporeal traction, the rectum was mobilized to identify the cyst. The cyst was removed using an endo-bag, with completion of cyst dissection. The final pathologic diagnosis was a tailgut cyst, or retrorectal cystic hamartoma without evidence of malignancy. The patient was discharged without any complications. The patient had no dyschezia or problems with bowel function. Laparoscopic resection is a safe and feasible method for surgical treatment, even for bulky retrorectal tumors, with an early recovery period.

Does a retrorectal tumour remain a challenge for surgeons?

Background: Retrorectal tumours are lesions with a wide range of histological differentiation that are often diagnostic and clinical challenges due to their rare occurrence. Many cases of this pathology are treated in regional hospitals, which results in serious complications because physicians fail to recognize this pathology. We present our experience in treating these tumours. Methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was performed using the Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics patient database. Thirty-five cases were identified. Results: Occurrence of retrorectal tumours was higher in women than in men and accounted for 82.86% and 17.14%, respectively. Computer tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were the main methods used to confirm diagnosis and plan surgical treatment. We have used a laparotomy, perineal or combined approach for tumour extirpation. The laparotomy approach was the most used, followed by perineal extirpation. The most common histological type was cystic hamartoma, accounting for 20% of cases. In 80% of cases, the histological findings greatly varied. Hospital stays varied from 3 to 21 days with a mean of 11.6 ± 5.83 days. The postoperative complication rate was 17.14% and was present in six cases. Overall survival was 85.17%, with an average follow-up period of 71.83 months. There were no recurrent tumours diagnosed during follow-up. Conclusion: Retrorectal tumours are a very rare pathology with high histological heterogeneity and problematic diagnostics. Patients should be referred to a tertiary centre that has experience and diagnostic capabilities for the best diagnostic and treatment options.

Retrorectal Tumors in Adults: A 10-Year Retrospective Study

Due to the rarity and large diversity of the primary retrorectal tumors (RTs), the diagnoses are often difficult and they can be misdiagnosed. We present our experience in light of scarce information available on the clinical manifestations of RTs. The retrospective study included 17 patients diagnosed as RTs between January 2004 and January 2014. Demographic characteristics, length of symptoms, clinical findings, diagnostic methods, evaluations on the treatment procedures and postoperative periods, pathology, complications, and length of hospital stay were recorded. A mean of 1.7 of patients were diagnosed with RTs annually in our hospital. Patients comprised 12 females and 5 males. Pain and discomfort were the most common symptoms at presentation. All the lesions were evaluated by using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT), and all the patients were treated operatively. Based on the preoperative MRI or CT findings, an anterior approach was performed in 7 patients, a posterior approach in 6 patients, and combined approach in 4 patients. Mean size of tumors was 9.2 ± 4.3 cm. Epidermoid cyst (n = 8) was the most common tumor. Except for 1 case of liposarcoma, 16 tumors were confirmed to be of benign nature in histologic examination. Mean length of hospital stay 12.4 ± 6.8 days. Retrorectal tumors are heterogeneous and lead to diagnostic difficulties. A high index of clinical suspicion is needed for diagnosis. Preoperative imaging may be helpful in determining the course of treatment. Total excision of a retrorectal tumor may alleviate pressure symptoms and confirm the diagnosis.

Robotic Excision of Retrorectal Mass

BACKGROUND

Retrorectal cysts make up a small but challenging group of pelvic masses, especially if they extend high into the pelvis. We present a case of successful robotic removal of a large retrorectal cyst.

METHODS

Video presentation of a robotic excision of a retrorectal mass.

RESULTS

We present a case of robotic removal of a large retrorectal mass extending up to the S3 vertebra.

DISCUSSION

Robotic approach is a very useful tool for successful removal of large pelvic masses that cannot be removed by traditional posterior or trans perineal approach.

Retrorectal Tumors: A Comprehensive Literature Review

IMPORTANCE

Retrorectal tumors are rare lesions that comprise a multitude of histologic types. Reports are limited to small single-institution case series, and recommendations on the ideal surgical approaches are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to provide a comprehensive review of the epidemiology, pathologic subtypes, surgical approaches, and clinical outcomes of retrorectal tumors.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

We conducted a review of the literature using PubMed and searched the reference lists of published studies.

RESULTS

A total of 341 studies comprising 1708 patients were included. Overall, 68 % of patients were female. The mean age was 44.6 ± 13.7 years. Of all patients, 1194 (70 %) had benign lesions, and 514 patients (30 %) had malignant tumors. Congenital tumors (60.5 %) were the most frequent histologic type. Other pathologic types were neurogenic tumors (14.8 %), osseous tumors (3.1 %), inflammatory tumors (2.6 %), and miscellaneous tumors (19.1 %). Biopsy was performed in 27 % of the patients. Of these patients, incorrect diagnoses occurred in 44 %. An anterior surgical approach (AA) was performed in 299 patients (35 %); a posterior approach (PA) was performed in 443 (52 %), and a combined approach (CA) was performed in 119 patients (14 %). The mean length of stay (LOS) of PA was 7 ± 5 days compared to 8 ± 7 days for AA and 11 ± 7 days for CA (p < 0.05). The overall morbidity rate was 13.2 %: 19.3 % associated with anterior approach, 7.2 % associated with posterior approach, and 24.7 % after a combined approach (p < 0.05). Overall postoperative recurrence rate was 21.6 %; 6.7 % after an anterior approach, 26.6 % after a posterior approach, and 28.6 % after a combined approach (p < 0.05). A minimally invasive approach (MIS) was employed in 83 patients. MIS provided shorter hospital stays than open surgery (4 ± 2 vs. 9 ± 7 days; p < 0.05). Differences in complication rate were 19.8 % in MIS and 12.2 % in open surgery and not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Retrorectal tumors are most commonly benign in etiology, of a congenital nature, and have a female predominance. Complete surgical resection is the cornerstone of retrorectal tumor management. A minimal access surgery approach, when feasible, appears to be a safe option for the management of retrorectal tumors, with shorter operative time and length of stay.

Primary Cystic Lesions of the Retrorectal Space: MRI Evaluation and Clinical Assessment

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the a priori chance that primary cystic lesions of the retrorectal space are malignant and to investigate MRI characteristics that indicate malignancy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients referred to a center for colorectal surgery were recruited from 2000 to 2014. Lesions were proven by clinical assessment and histopathology. MRI was performed at 1.5 T with examinations evaluated by two radiologists. Interobserver agreement was assessed (Cohen kappa) and differences between malignant and benign lesions calculated (Fisher exact test).

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients (22 women, six men; age range, 18-70 years) with 31 lesions were included. Lesions were categorized as tailgut cysts (n = 16, 52%), teratomas (n = 9, 29%), lesions of colorectal origin (n = 4, 13%), or neurogenic lesions (n = 2, 6%). Five patients (18%) had malignant lesions. Colorectal lesions had the highest percentage of malignancy (3/4, 75%). A solid tissue component was found in all five (100%) malignant lesions and two (8%) of the benign lesions, which were both teratomas (p < 0.05). Sensitivity and specificity for malignancy according to the presence of a solid tissue component was 100% (5/5) and 92% (24/26). For unilocularity, multilocularity, debris, septa, and wall thickening, differences were not significant. Interobserver agreement was excellent (κ = 1) for all characteristics except debris (κ = 0.795).

CONCLUSION

The majority of retrorectal cystic lesions are benign. The presence of a solid tissue component should raise suspicion for malignancy.

Diagnosis of Tailgut Cyst in Gynecologic Patients: Systematic Review of the Literature

Tailgut cysts, also called retrorectal cystic hamartomas, are rare findings that usually occur in the retrorectal space. The incidence is estimated to be about 1 in 40,000.

The aim of our review is to evaluate the potential pitfalls in the diagnosis of this rare pathologic condition, according to diagnostic procedures for this rare but misleading and subtle entity.

We conducted a Medline literature review of the English literature discussing tailgut cysts in female patients. We concentrated on imaging technology used for diagnosis in gynecologic patients. For our search, we used the key words “tailgut cyst”, “retrorectal cystic hamartoma”, “gynecology”, focusing on clinical presentation, imaging technology used for diagnosis, presence of malignancy, and misdiagnosis with more common gynecologic pathology.

Our search revealed 143 articles during the years 1975–2016 and, of these, 30 articles describing 91 female patients were considered.

We concluded that tailgut cyst should be included in the differential diagnosis of pelvic lesions in gynecologic patients.

Progress in the management of retrorectal tumours

AIM

Tumours in the retrorectal space are rare and pathologically heterogeneous. The roles of imaging and preoperative biopsy, nonoperative management and the indications for surgical resection are controversial. This study investigated a series of retrorectal tumours treated in a single institution with the aim of producing a modern improved management algorithm.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis was conducted of the management of all retrorectal lesions identified between 1998 and 2013 from a radiology database search. Patient demographics, presenting symptoms, imaging, biopsy, management and the results were recorded. Descriptive statistics were used and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients with a confirmed retrorectal tumour were identified. The median age was 50 (36-67 interquartile range) and 42 (56%) were female. Twenty (29%) of the tumours were malignant: 4 of 41 cystic lesions were malignant (12.9%) vs. 16 of 28 solid (or heterogeneous) lesions (57.1%) (P < 0.0001). Imaging demonstrated a 95% sensitivity and 64% specificity for differentiating benign from malignant tumours. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was significantly better at distinguishing between benign and malignant tumours than computed tomography (94% vs. 64%, P = 0.03). Percutaneous biopsy was performed in 16 patients and only 27 underwent resection. There was no evidence of local recurrence associated with biopsy. Solid lesions were associated with a nonsignificant decreased overall survival (P = 0.348).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that MRI should be the investigation of choice for retrorectal lesions. Biopsy of solid lesions is safe and useful for guiding neoadjuvant and surgical therapy. Cystic lesions without suspicious radiological features can be followed by serial imaging without resection.

Management approach and surgical strategies for retrorectal tumours: a systematic review

AIM

The management strategy for retrorectal tumours is complex. Due to their rarity, few surgeons have expertise in management.

METHOD

A systematic literature review was conducted using the PubMed database. English language publications in the years 2011-2015 that assessed preoperative management, surgical strategies and chemoradiotherapy for presacral tumours were included. Two hundred and fifty-one abstracts were screened of which 88 met the inclusion criteria. After review of the full text, this resulted in a final list of 42 studies eligible for review.

RESULTS

In all, 932 patients (63.2% female, 36.8% male; P < 0.01) with a retrorectal tumour were identified. Most were benign (65.9% vs. 33.7%, P < 0.01). Imaging distinguished benign from malignant lesions in 88.1% of cases; preoperative biopsy was superior to imaging in providing an accurate definitive diagnosis (91.3% vs. 61.4%, P < 0.05) with negligible seeding risk. Biopsy should be performed in solid tumours. It is useful in guiding neoadjuvant therapy for gastrointestinal stromal tumours, sarcomas and desmoid type fibromatosis and may alter the management strategy in cases of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and metastases. Biopsies for cystic lesions are not recommended. The gold standard in imaging is MRI. The posterior Kraske procedure is the most common surgical approach. Overall, the reported recurrence rate was 19.7%.

CONCLUSION

This review evaluated the management strategies for retrorectal tumours. A preoperative biopsy should be performed for solid tumours. MRI is the most useful imaging modality. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment. There is limited information on robotic surgery, single-port surgery, transanal endoscopic microsurgery, chemoradiotherapy and reconstruction.

Tailgut cyst accompanied with bony defect

Retro-rectal cystic hamartoma (tailgut cyst), is an uncommon congenital developmental lesion, generally located in the retro-rectal space. Its diagnosis and approach is challenging because the retropelvic space is not familiar. We report a 51-year-old woman who presented with paresthesia and pain in perianal area. The magnetic resonance image showed high signal intensity on the T1-weighted image and iso to high signal intensity on the T2-weighted image of the retropelvic space and CT showed sacral bony defect. We chose the posterior approach for removal of the tailgut cyst. Histopathology exam of the retropelvic cyst revealed a multiloculated cyst containing abundant mucoid material lined by both squamous and glandular mucinous epithelium. The patient has recovered nicely with no recurrence. Tailgut cyst needs complete surgical excision for good prognosis. So, a preoperative high-resolution image and co-operation between neurosurgen and general surgeon would help to make safe and feasible diagnosis and surgical access.

Transsacral rectocele following combined neurinoma resection: A case report

•

Case of a combined (transsacral and laparoscopic) resection of a presacral tumour.

•

First described case of a transsacral rectocele two years after this procedure.

•

Possibility of laparoscopic defect repair of transsacral defects.

Introduction

This report describes for the first time a case of a transsacral rectocele after combined abdominotranssacral tumour resection. Furthermore, we demonstrate a method for laparoscopic defect repair.

Presentation of case

A 44-year-old Caucasian female presented to our hospital with strange gurgling sounds and a painless subdermal swelling in her lower back after resection of a presacral neurinoma two years earlier. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a huge rectocele through a sacral defect extending into the subcutaneous tissue. We performed a laparoscopic defect repair with the implantation of a self-fixating mesh graft. Five days after surgery, the patient was discharged in a good general condition. Five months after the operation, a follow-up MRI showed a good postoperative result with the correct position of the rectum.

Discussion

The repair of transsacral prolapses with attachment of a mesh is complicated by the high rigidity of the pelvis and its surrounding structures. The key criteria in choosing the method of operative approach are the size and content of the prolapse. Huge sacral defects with bowel prolapses require a transabdominal approach to enable repositioning the bowel into the abdomen and excluding bowel injuries and inner hernias.

Conclusion

A laparoscopic approach provides a good intraoperative visibility for a safe retrorectal preparation and mesh graft repair of sacral defects.

Imaging of presacral masses--a multidisciplinary approach

Our objective is to describe an approach for retrorectal/presacral mass evaluation on imaging with attention to imaging features, allowing for refinement of the differential diagnosis of these masses. Elaborate on clinically relevant features that may affect biopsy or surgical approach, of which the radiologist should be aware. A review of current literature regarding the diagnosis and treatment of retrorectal/presacral masses was performed with attention to specific findings, which may lend refinement to the differential diagnosis of these masses. Cases were obtained by searching through a radiology database at a single institution after Institutional Review Board approval. Recent advances in imaging and treatment methods have led to the increased role of radiology in both imaging and tissue diagnosis of retrorectal masses. Surgical philosophies surrounding the treatment of these masses have not significantly changed in recent years, but there are a few key factors of which the radiologist must be aware. The radiologist can offer refinement of the differential diagnosis of retrorectal masses and can elaborate on salient findings which could alter the need for neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy, pre-surgical tissue diagnosis and surgical approach. This article presents an imaging approach to retrorectal/presacral masses with emphasis on findings which can dictate the ultimate need for neoadjuvant therapy and pre-surgical tissue diagnosis and alter the preferred surgical approach. This article consolidates key findings, so radiologists can become more clinically relevant in the evaluation of these masses.

A Rare Presentation of Lower Back Swelling as Tailgut Cyst

Retrorectal cystic hamartoma, also known as tailgut cyst, is a rare congenital developmental lesion arising from postnatal primitive gut remnants in the retrorectal space. The rarity of the lesion and its anatomical position usually leads to difficulty in diagnosis and surgical management. This cyst predominantly occurs in women (female to male ratio, 3:1). Tailgut cysts can present as incidental findings during the routine examination but over half of the patients are thought to present with symptoms. Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging has a crucial role in diagnosing these misdiagnosed cysts. Complete surgical excision is the treatment of choice for tailgut cysts as this provides a definitive diagnosis, relieves symptoms, and prevents possible complications such as infection, fistula formation, and malignant degeneration. We present a case of a 40-year-old female, who presented to us with lower back swelling (7 cm × 5 cm) for last 2 years, which had become more prominent to her while sitting. The patient was investigated. Ultrasonography demonstrated ill-defined large cystic lesion (8 cm × 7 cm), posterior to the uterus. Fine needle aspiration cytology suggested sebaceous cyst. A lumbosacral contrast-enhanced computed tomography demonstrated well-defined fluid density mass/collection with enhancing walls in the retrorectal, presacral, precoccygeal area, and suggested tailgut duplication cyst/retrorectal cystic hamartoma. Surgical complete excision of the cystic mass was done with both anterior (transabdominal) and posterior approach. Histopathology confirmed a tailgut cyst.

Perineal approach for surgical treatment in a patient with retro-rectal tumor: a case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Retrorectal tumors in adults are very rare and little known condition. These tumors, often misdiagnosed or mistreated, should be completely excised because of the potential for malignancy or infection. A suitable operative approach is the key to the successful surgical management.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report the case of a 45-year-old Arab male who presented with chronic pelvic pain accompanied by straining to defecate and dysuria. The clinical examination showed a painless mass in the left perineal area. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scan demonstrated a huge and well-limited pelvic mass causing displacement and compression of the rectum and bladder. Although the large size of the mass (>7 cm in the greater diameter), it was successfully and completely excised through only perineal approach without undertaking coccygectomy or sacrectomy. The histopathological study revealed a low-grade leiomyosarcoma. The patient is currently in 4-years follow-up with no signs of recurrence or metastasis.

CONCLUSION

Even large retro-rectal tumors may be successfully excised by the perineal approach especially in carefully selected patients, but require extensive knowledge of pelvic anatomy and expertise in pelvic surgery.

Surgical treatment of retrorectal (presacral) tumors

Retrorectal (also known as presacral) tumor (RT) is a rare disease of retrorectal space. They can be classified as congenital, inflammatory, neurogenic, osseous, or miscellaneous. The most common presentation is an asymptomatic mass discovered on routine rectal examination, but certain nonspecific symptoms can be elicited by careful history and physical examination. The primary and only satisfactory treatment is surgery for RTs. Three approaches commonly used for resection are abdominal, transsacral, or a combined abdominosacral approach. Prognosis is directly related primary local control, which is often difficult to achieve for malignant lesions.

Preoperative assessment of retrorectal tumours

Background

Retrorectal tumours present diagnostic and surgical challenges. This study aimed to identify whether preoperative imaging and/or biopsy provide diagnostic accuracy.

Methods

A consecutive series of patients who had undergone excision of a retrorectal tumour were identified from a database (2002–2013). Details of patient demographics, preoperative presentation, imaging, biopsy, surgical procedure, and gross and microscopic pathology were reviewed. Preoperative imaging and/or biopsies were compared with eventual pathology findings.

Results

In total, 76 patients were identified, all of whom had undergone preoperative cross-sectional imaging whereas only 22 had preoperative biopsy. Imaging correctly discriminated benign from malignant tumours in 72 of the 76 patients (specificity 97 per cent, sensitivity 88 per cent, positive predictive value 88 per cent and negative predictive value 97 per cent). The corresponding values for preoperative biopsy (benign versus malignant) were 100, 83, 100 and 93 per cent. None of the four patients who were assessed incorrectly as having benign or malignant disease on imaging would have undergone an alternative procedure had this been known before surgery. Preoperative biopsy did not significantly influence patient management, and the absence of preoperative biopsy had no detrimental effect; a definitive preoperative histological diagnosis would not have influenced subsequent management.

Conclusion

Preoperative imaging was accurate in the assessment of retrorectal tumours, whereas biopsy did not add to the surgical strategy.

Surgical management of a retro-rectal cystic hamartoma (tailgut cyst) using a trans-rectal approach: a case report and review of the literature

Introduction

Retro-rectal cystic hamartoma (tailgut cyst) is a rare congenital developmental lesion arising from post-natal primitive gut remnants in the retro-rectal space. The rarity of the lesion and its anatomical position usually leads to difficulty in diagnosis and surgical management. Complete surgical resection remains the cornerstone of treatment. A dozen or so surgical approaches have been described in the literature to date to make the operation as simple as possible, but the trans-rectal access route is extremely rarely reported and not well described. Here, we present a case that demonstrates the trans-rectal approach to a retro-rectal tumor is a feasible option in terms of surgical radicality, minimal invasiveness and safety for carefully selected patients with this rare type of retro-rectal cystic lesion.

Case presentation

A 29-year-old Caucasian woman was referred to our institution due to perineal pain extending to the right inguinal region. Her symptoms had been present for the last two months. She was first examined at her regional hospital for a suspected ruptured ovarian cyst; however, after consultation with a gynecologist and a computed tomography scan of her pelvis, a tumor in the retro-rectal space was discovered. Our patient was admitted to our hospital and when a pelvic magnetic resonance imaging study confirmed the diagnosis of the retro-rectal cystic formation, a complete extirpation of retro-rectal tumor fixed to the coccyx using trans-rectal approach was performed. The final pathological diagnosis was retro-rectal cystic hamartoma (tailgut cyst) with no evidence of malignancy. Her post-operative course was uneventful, and at four months after surgery our patient is symptom free with no evidence of recurrent or residual disease.

Conclusions

Trans-rectal excision is feasible in terms of surgical radicality and is a simple to perform, minimally invasive and safe option, providing complete recovery for carefully selected patients with retro-rectal cystic hamartoma treated operatively.