Risk-reducing Surgery in Women at Risk for Familial Breast or Ovarian Cancer

Accuracy in risk understanding among BRCA1/2-mutation carriers

OBJECTIVE

BRCA1/2-mutation carriers are at high risk of developing cancer. Since they must weigh clinical recommendations and decide on risk-reducing measures, the correct understanding of their 10-year cancer risks is essential. This study focused on the accuracy of women's subjective estimates of developing breast and ovarian cancer within ten years as prerequisite to reduce unnecessary prevention.

METHODS

59 and 52 BRCA1/2-mutation carriers provided their individual risks of developing breast or ovarian cancer in the next 10 years, along with self-reported sociodemographic and psychosocial variables. Women's risk estimates were compared with their objective cancer risks that had been communicated before.

RESULTS

22.6% of counselees under- and 53.2% of the counselees overestimated their 10-year risk of developing breast cancer. As for ovarian cancer, 5.6% under- whereas 51.9% overestimated their risk. Neither demographic factors such as education, parenthood and age, nor a prior diagnosis of breast cancer or prophylactic surgery accounted for these variations in risk accuracy.

CONCLUSION

Currently, risk communication during genetic counseling does not guarantee accurate risk estimation in BRCA-mutation carriers.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Counselors must be prepared to prevent overestimation. Counselees' risk estimates need to be assessed and corrected to enable informed decision-making and reduce risks of unnecessary preventive efforts.

Cost effectiveness of bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy

Background

Growing demand for risk-reducing surgery in individuals with inherited susceptibility to cancer leads to the question whether these procedures are cost effective for the executing hospitals. This study compared the clinical costs for bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy (BRRM) with and without different types of reconstruction, risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO), and their combinations with corresponding reimbursements in the statutory health-care system in Germany.

Patients and methods

Real total costs of care for BRRM with and without reconstruction, RRSO, and their combinations were calculated as the sum of all personnel and technical costs. These costs calculated in a German University hospital were compared with the sum of all reimbursements in the German DRG-based health-care system.

Results

While sole RRSO, BRRM without reconstruction, and BRRM with secondary DIEP (deep inferior epigastric perforator)—reconstruction still result in a small benefit, we even found shortfalls for the hospital with all other prophylactic operations under consideration. The calculated deficits were especially high for BRRM with implant-based breast reconstruction and for combined operations when the risk reduction is achieved with a minimum of separate operations.

Conclusions

Risk-reducing surgery in BRCA-mutation carriers is frequently not cost-covering for the executing hospitals in the German health-care system. Thus, appropriate concepts are required to ensure a nationwide care.

Small Cell Ovarian Carcinomas - Characterisation of Two Rare Tumor Entities

Objective: Small cell ovarian carcinomas (SCOC) are differentiated into two types: hypercalcaemic (SCOCHT) and pulmonary (SCOCPT). Unfortunately, little is known about pulmonary-type small cell ovarian carcinoma. Study Design: We carried out a systematic analysis of all available reports in the literature on individual cases of SCOCHT and SCOCPT. Results: We found that patients with SCOCPT were significantly older than those with SCOCHT. Vimentin and chromogranin detection by immunohistochemistry allow good differentiation between the two types. Interestingly, SCOCPT but not SCOCHT was found to be associated with other benign and malignant ovarian tumours in about 44 % of cases. Although the percentage of R0/R1 resections was high (~ 74 %), survival was poor; even in patients with disease limited to the ovaries (stage Ia and Ib) the recurrence rate was 40 %. Chemotherapy with etoposide or anthracyclines could be useful. Conclusion: Taking the limitations of our study such as its retrospective nature into account and based on the results from studies of small cell carcinomas originating from other tumour sites, we conclude that treatment of SCOCPT should be based on the therapies used to treat other small cell carcinomas. Surgery is appropriate, especially in very early stages of disease, but chemotherapy should not be omitted. Newer concepts such as treatment with somatostatin analogues could help to control symptoms and stabilise some slow-growing tumours.

Participation in the SUCCESS-A Trial Improves Intensity and Quality of Care for Patients with Primary Breast Cancer

The SUCCESS-A trial is a prospective, multicenter, phase III clinical trial for high-risk primary breast cancer. It compares disease-free survival after randomization in patients treated with fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by 3 cycles of docetaxel (FEC-D) with that of patients treated with 3 cycles of FEC followed by 3 cycles of gemcitabine and docetaxel (FEC-DG). After a second randomization patients were treated with zoledronate for 2 or 5 years. A total of 251 centers took part in the trial and 3754 patients were recruited over a period of 18 months which ended in March 2007. In a questionnaire-based survey we investigated the impact of enrollment in the trial on patient care, the choice of chemotherapy protocol and access to current oncologic information as well as overall satisfaction in the respective centers. Analysis of the 78 questionnaires returned showed that 40 % of the centers had never previously enrolled patients with these indications in clinical studies. Prior to participating in the study, 4 % of the centers prescribed CMF or other protocols in patients with high-primary breast cancer risk, 46 % administered anthracycline-based chemotherapy and 50 % gave taxane-based chemotherapy. Around half of the participating centers noted that intensity of care and overall quality of care became even better and that access to breast cancer-specific information improved through participation in the trial. After their experience with the SUCCESS-A trial, all of the centers stated that they were prepared to enroll patients in clinical phase III trials again in the future. These data indicate that both patients and physicians benefit from clinical trials, as enrollment improves treatment strategies and individual patient care, irrespective of study endpoints.