1
|
Behrens A, Fasching PA, Schwenke E, Gass P, Häberle L, Heindl F, Heusinger K, Lotz L, Lubrich H, Preuß C, Schneider MO, Schulz-Wendtland R, Stumpfe FM, Uder M, Wunderle M, Zahn AL, Hack CC, Beckmann MW, Emons J. Predicting mammographic density with linear ultrasound transducers. Eur J Med Res 2023; 28:384. [PMID: 37770952 PMCID: PMC10537934 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01327-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High mammographic density (MD) is a risk factor for the development of breast cancer (BC). Changes in MD are influenced by multiple factors such as age, BMI, number of full-term pregnancies and lactating periods. To learn more about MD, it is important to establish non-radiation-based, alternative examination methods to mammography such as ultrasound assessments. METHODS We analyzed data from 168 patients who underwent standard-of-care mammography and performed additional ultrasound assessment of the breast using a high-frequency (12 MHz) linear probe of the VOLUSON® 730 Expert system (GE Medical Systems Kretztechnik GmbH & Co OHG, Austria). Gray level bins were calculated from ultrasound images to characterize mammographic density. Percentage mammographic density (PMD) was predicted by gray level bins using various regression models. RESULTS Gray level bins and PMD correlated to a certain extent. Spearman's ρ ranged from - 0.18 to 0.32. The random forest model turned out to be the most accurate prediction model (cross-validated R2, 0.255). Overall, ultrasound images from the VOLUSON® 730 Expert device in this study showed limited predictive power for PMD when correlated with the corresponding mammograms. CONCLUSIONS In our present work, no reliable prediction of PMD using ultrasound imaging could be observed. As previous studies showed a reasonable correlation, predictive power seems to be highly dependent on the device used. Identifying feasible non-radiation imaging methods of the breast and their predictive power remains an important topic and warrants further evaluation. Trial registration 325-19 B (Ethics Committee of the medical faculty at Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annika Behrens
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Eva Schwenke
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Paul Gass
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lothar Häberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Felix Heindl
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Katharina Heusinger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Laura Lotz
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Hannah Lubrich
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Caroline Preuß
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael O Schneider
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland
- Department of Radiology, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Florian M Stumpfe
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael Uder
- Department of Radiology, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Marius Wunderle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anna L Zahn
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carolin C Hack
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Julius Emons
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Heindl F, Fasching PA, Hein A, Hack CC, Heusinger K, Gass P, Pöschke P, Stübs FA, Schulz-Wendtland R, Hartmann A, Erber R, Beckmann MW, Meyer J, Häberle L, Jud SM, Emons J. Mammographic density and prognosis in primary breast cancer patients. Breast 2021; 59:51-57. [PMID: 34157655 PMCID: PMC8237359 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Mammographic density (MD) is one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer (BC). However, the influence of MD on the BC prognosis is unclear. The objective of this study was therefore to investigate whether percentage MD (PMD) is associated with a difference in disease-free or overall survival in primary BC patients. METHODS A total of 2525 patients with primary, metastasis-free BC were followed up retrospectively for this analysis. For all patients, PMD was evaluated by two readers using a semi-automated method. The association between PMD and prognosis was evaluated using Cox regression models with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) as the outcome, and the following adjustments: age at diagnosis, year of diagnosis, body mass index, tumor stage, grading, lymph node status, hormone receptor and HER2 status. RESULTS After median observation periods of 9.5 and 10.0 years, no influence of PMD on DFS (p = 0.46, likelihood ratio test (LRT)) or OS (p = 0.22, LRT), respectively, was found. In the initial unadjusted analysis higher PMD was associated with longer DFS and OS. The effect of PMD on DFS and OS disappeared after adjustment for age and was caused by the underlying age effect. CONCLUSIONS Although MD is one of the strongest independent risk factors for BC, in our collective PMD is not associated with disease-free and overall survival in patients with BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Heindl
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, European Metropolitan Area Erlangen-Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, European Metropolitan Area Erlangen-Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, European Metropolitan Area Erlangen-Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carolin C Hack
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, European Metropolitan Area Erlangen-Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Katharina Heusinger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, European Metropolitan Area Erlangen-Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Paul Gass
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, European Metropolitan Area Erlangen-Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Patrik Pöschke
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, European Metropolitan Area Erlangen-Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Frederik A Stübs
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, European Metropolitan Area Erlangen-Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland
- Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, European Metropolitan Area Erlangen-Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Ramona Erber
- Institute of Pathology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, European Metropolitan Area Erlangen-Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, European Metropolitan Area Erlangen-Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Julia Meyer
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, European Metropolitan Area Erlangen-Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany; Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lothar Häberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, European Metropolitan Area Erlangen-Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany; Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sebastian M Jud
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, European Metropolitan Area Erlangen-Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Julius Emons
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, European Metropolitan Area Erlangen-Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dietzel M, Clauser P, Kapetas P, Schulz-Wendtland R, Baltzer PAT. Images Are Data: A Breast Imaging Perspective on a Contemporary Paradigm. ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG 2021; 193:898-908. [PMID: 33535260 DOI: 10.1055/a-1346-0095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Considering radiological examinations not as mere images, but as a source of data, has become the key paradigm in the diagnostic imaging field. This change of perspective is particularly popular in breast imaging. It allows breast radiologists to apply algorithms derived from computer science, to realize innovative clinical applications, and to refine already established methods. In this context, the terminology "imaging biomarker", "radiomics", and "artificial intelligence" are of pivotal importance. These methods promise noninvasive, low-cost (e. g., in comparison to multigene arrays), and workflow-friendly (automated, only one examination, instantaneous results, etc.) delivery of clinically relevant information. METHODS AND RESULTS This paper is designed as a narrative review on the previously mentioned paradigm. The focus is on key concepts in breast imaging and important buzzwords are explained. For all areas of breast imaging, exemplary studies and potential clinical use cases are discussed. CONCLUSION Considering radiological examination as a source of data may optimize patient management by guiding individualized breast cancer diagnosis and oncologic treatment in the age of precision medicine. KEY POINTS · In conventional breast imaging, examinations are interpreted based on patterns perceivable by visual inspection.. · The radiomics paradigm treats breast images as a source of data, containing information beyond what is visible to our eyes.. · This results in radiomic signatures that may be considered as imaging biomarkers, as they provide diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic information.. · Radiomics derived imaging biomarkers may be used to individualize breast cancer treatment in the era of precision medicine.. · The concept and key research of radiomics in the field of breast imaging will be discussed in this narrative review.. CITATION FORMAT · Dietzel M, Clauser P, Kapetas P et al. Images Are Data: A Breast Imaging Perspective on a Contemporary Paradigm. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2021; 193: 898 - 908.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paola Clauser
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Panagiotis Kapetas
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Pascal Andreas Thomas Baltzer
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schulz-Wendtland R, Reiser M. [Breast diagnostics: from clinical diagnostics to artificial intelligence]. Radiologe 2021; 61:123-125. [PMID: 33523246 PMCID: PMC7848869 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-021-00804-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- R Schulz-Wendtland
- Radiologisches Institut, Gynäkologische Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Universitätsstraße 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
| | - M Reiser
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, LMU-Klinikum, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wasner S, Schulz-Wendtland R, Emons J. [Fusion of mammography and ultrasonography]. Radiologe 2021; 61:166-169. [PMID: 33452568 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-020-00796-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL PROCEDURES Currently, the combination of mammography and sonography is the gold standard in breast diagnostics. If there are any uncertainties, further examinations such as breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and, in studies, computer tomographic procedures can be used. These investigations are carried out separately. METHODICAL INNOVATION The combination of different imaging techniques in fusion devices promises a significant improvement in breast diagnostics. Advantages of the new imaging technique include the simultaneous acquisition of different image modalities with a fixed breast, which allows better spatial localization of the region of interest (ROI). This can also reduce the time and investigator effort and compensate for the weaknesses of one imaging technique with the strengths of a second imaging technique. The current state of research and the history of the fusion of ultrasound and mammography in breast diagnostics are summarized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Wasner
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstraße 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland
- Gynäkologische Radiologie, Radiologisches Institut des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstraße 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
| | - Julius Emons
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstraße 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Emons J, Fasching PA, Wunderle M, Heindl F, Rieger J, Horn F, Pelzer G, Ritter A, Weber T, Radicke M, Polifka I, Wachter DL, Wenkel E, Michel T, Uder M, Hartmann A, Anton G, Beckmann MW, Schulz-Wendtland R, Jud SM. Assessment of the additional clinical potential of X-ray dark-field imaging for breast cancer in a preclinical setup. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2020. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1717890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- J Emons
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
| | - PA Fasching
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
| | - M Wunderle
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
| | - F Heindl
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
| | - J Rieger
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics
| | - F Horn
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics
| | - G Pelzer
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics
| | - A Ritter
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics
| | - T Weber
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics
| | | | - I Polifka
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Pathology
| | - DL Wachter
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Pathology
| | - E Wenkel
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Radiologie
| | - T Michel
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics
| | - M Uder
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Radiologie
| | - A Hartmann
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Pathology
| | - G Anton
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics
| | - MW Beckmann
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
| | | | - SM Jud
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Heindl F, Fasching PA, Hein A, Hack CC, Heusinger K, Gaß P, Schulz-Wendtland R, Hartmann A, Erber R, Beckmann MW, Meyer J, Häberle L, Jud SM. Mammographische Dichte und Prognose bei Patientinnen mit primärem Mammakarzinom – Risikoverlust durch zunehmendes Alter. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2020. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1717894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- F Heindl
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen, Europäische Metropolregion Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
| | - PA Fasching
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen, Europäische Metropolregion Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
| | - A Hein
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen, Europäische Metropolregion Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
| | - CC Hack
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen, Europäische Metropolregion Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
| | - K Heusinger
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen, Europäische Metropolregion Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
| | - P Gaß
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen, Europäische Metropolregion Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
| | - R Schulz-Wendtland
- Institut für Diagnostische Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen, Europäische Metropolregion Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
| | - A Hartmann
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen, Europäische Metropolregion Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
| | - R Erber
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen, Europäische Metropolregion Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
| | - MW Beckmann
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen, Europäische Metropolregion Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
| | - J Meyer
- Biostatistische Einheit, Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen, Europäische Metropolregion Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
| | - L Häberle
- Biostatistische Einheit, Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen, Europäische Metropolregion Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
| | - SM Jud
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen, Europäische Metropolregion Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gaß P, Häberle L, Hein A, Jud SM, Lux MP, Hack CC, Emons J, Heindl F, Nabieva N, Loehberg CR, Schulz-Wendtland R, Hartmann A, Beckmann MW, Fasching PA, Wunderle M. Einfluss der Familienanamnese eines Mamma- oder Ovarialkarzinoms auf die pathologische Komplettremission und die Prognose bei Patientinnen mit einem Mammakarzinom nach neoadjuvanter Chemotherapie. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2020. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1717891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- P Gaß
- Universitätsklinik Erlangen-Nürnberg, Frauenklinik
| | - L Häberle
- Universitätsklinik Erlangen-Nürnberg, Frauenklinik
| | - A Hein
- Universitätsklinik Erlangen-Nürnberg, Frauenklinik
| | - SM Jud
- Universitätsklinik Erlangen-Nürnberg, Frauenklinik
| | - MP Lux
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauen- und Kinderklinik St. Louise
- St. Josefs-Krankenhaus
| | - CC Hack
- Universitätsklinik Erlangen-Nürnberg, Frauenklinik
| | - J Emons
- Universitätsklinik Erlangen-Nürnberg, Frauenklinik
| | - F Heindl
- Universitätsklinik Erlangen-Nürnberg, Frauenklinik
| | - N Nabieva
- Universitätsklinik Erlangen-Nürnberg, Frauenklinik
| | - CR Loehberg
- Universitätsklinik Erlangen-Nürnberg, Frauenklinik
| | - R Schulz-Wendtland
- Institut für Diagnostische Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
| | - A Hartmann
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
| | - MW Beckmann
- Universitätsklinik Erlangen-Nürnberg, Frauenklinik
| | - PA Fasching
- Universitätsklinik Erlangen-Nürnberg, Frauenklinik
| | - M Wunderle
- Universitätsklinik Erlangen-Nürnberg, Frauenklinik
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wuerfel FM, Huebner H, Häberle L, Gass P, Hein A, Jud SM, Hack CC, Wunderle M, Schulz-Wendtland R, Erber R, Hartmann A, Ekici AB, Beckmann MW, Fasching PA, Ruebner M. HLA-G and HLA-F protein isoform expression in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment. Sci Rep 2020; 10:15750. [PMID: 32978482 PMCID: PMC7519664 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-72837-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2019] [Accepted: 09/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The immunosuppressive human leukocyte antigens HLA-G and HLA-F are expressed on trophoblast and malignant cells. Four membrane-bound and three soluble HLA-G protein isoforms have been described, which have different immunosuppressive potentials. HLA-F has three transcript variants, resulting in three different protein isoforms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic and predictive value of HLA-G and HLA-F protein isoform expression patterns in patients with breast cancer. Core biopsies were taken at diagnosis in patients with HER2+ (n = 28), luminal B-like (n = 49) and triple-negative (n = 38) breast cancers who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Expression levels of HLA-F and -G were correlated with the pathological complete response (pCR). Protein expression was determined by Western blot analysis, using two antibodies for each HLA, specific for different isoforms. The protein expression of HLA isoforms did not significantly differ between breast cancer subtypes. However, some initial indications were found for an association between the soluble HLA-G6 protein isoform and pCR in HER2+ breast cancer. The study provides preliminary evidence for the evaluation of HLA-G isoform expression, in particular HLA-G6, as a possible new marker for pCR in HER2+ breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska M Wuerfel
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Hanna Huebner
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lothar Häberle
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Paul Gass
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sebastian M Jud
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carolin C Hack
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Marius Wunderle
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland
- Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Ramona Erber
- Institute of Pathology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Arif B Ekici
- Institute of Human Genetics, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias Ruebner
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Erber R, Meyer J, Taubert H, Fasching PA, Wach S, Häberle L, Gaß P, Schulz-Wendtland R, Landgraf L, Olbricht S, Jung R, Beckmann MW, Hartmann A, Ruebner M. PIWI-Like 1 and PIWI-Like 2 Expression in Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12102742. [PMID: 32987715 PMCID: PMC7598687 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12102742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Revised: 09/12/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary A family of proteins, the PIWI proteins, play a crucial role in the regulation of the development of germ cells and self-preservation of so-called stem cells. Former studies have shown that these proteins can be over- or underrepresented (over-/underexpressed) in some cancers and, in the case of abnormal expression, may be correlated with worse outcomes of tumor patients. In our study, we investigated the influence of the two PIWI proteins, PIWI-like 1 and PIWI-like 2, on the survival of breast cancer patients and their correlation with certain breast cancer subtypes. If a breast cancer showed a higher expression of PIWI-like 1 protein but less PIWI-like 2 protein than in non-tumorous tissue, the patient suffered from a more aggressive breast cancer subtype and had shorter survival. By analyzing these two proteins in breast cancer, we were able to predict tumor aggressiveness and prognosis. Abstract PIWI-like 1 and PIWI-like 2 play a role in stem cell self-renewal, and enhanced expression has been reported for several tumor entities. However, few studies have investigated PIWI-like 1 and PIWI-like 2 expressions in breast cancer subtypes regarding prognosis. Therefore, we examined protein expression in a large consecutive cohort of breast cancer patients and correlated it to breast cancer subtypes and survival outcome. PIWI-like 1 and PIWI-like 2 expressions were evaluated using immunohistochemistry in a cohort of 894 breast cancer patients, of whom 363 were eligible for further analysis. Percentage and intensity of stained tumor cells were analyzed and an immunoreactive score (IRS) was calculated. The interaction of PIWI-like 1 and PIWI-like 2 showed a prognostic effect on survival. For the combination of high PIWI-like 1 and low PIWI-like 2 expressions, adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were significantly higher with regard to overall survival (OS) (HR 2.92; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24, 6.90), disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 3.27; 95% CI 1.48, 7.20), and distant disease-free survival (DDFS) (HR 7.64; 95% CI 2.35, 24.82). Both proteins were significantly associated with molecular-like and PAM50 subgroups. Combining high PIWI-like 1 and low PIWI-like 2 expressions predicted poorer prognosis and both markers were associated with aggressive molecular subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramona Erber
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen—Europäische Metropolregion Nürnberg(EMN), University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (L.L.); (S.O.); (R.J.); (A.H.)
- Correspondence: (R.E.); (M.R.); Tel.: +49-9131-85-43634 (R.E.)
| | - Julia Meyer
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (J.M.); (P.A.F.); (L.H.); (P.G.); (M.W.B.)
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Biostatistics Unit, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Helge Taubert
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (H.T.); (S.W.)
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (J.M.); (P.A.F.); (L.H.); (P.G.); (M.W.B.)
| | - Sven Wach
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (H.T.); (S.W.)
| | - Lothar Häberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (J.M.); (P.A.F.); (L.H.); (P.G.); (M.W.B.)
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Biostatistics Unit, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Paul Gaß
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (J.M.); (P.A.F.); (L.H.); (P.G.); (M.W.B.)
| | - Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland
- Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany;
| | - Laura Landgraf
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen—Europäische Metropolregion Nürnberg(EMN), University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (L.L.); (S.O.); (R.J.); (A.H.)
| | - Sabrina Olbricht
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen—Europäische Metropolregion Nürnberg(EMN), University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (L.L.); (S.O.); (R.J.); (A.H.)
| | - Rudolf Jung
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen—Europäische Metropolregion Nürnberg(EMN), University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (L.L.); (S.O.); (R.J.); (A.H.)
| | - Matthias W. Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (J.M.); (P.A.F.); (L.H.); (P.G.); (M.W.B.)
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen—Europäische Metropolregion Nürnberg(EMN), University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (L.L.); (S.O.); (R.J.); (A.H.)
| | - Matthias Ruebner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (J.M.); (P.A.F.); (L.H.); (P.G.); (M.W.B.)
- Correspondence: (R.E.); (M.R.); Tel.: +49-9131-85-43634 (R.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Emons J, Fasching PA, Wunderle M, Heindl F, Rieger J, Horn F, Pelzer G, Ritter A, Weber T, Radicke M, Polifka I, Wachter DL, Wenkel E, Michel T, Uder M, Hartmann A, Anton G, Beckmann MW, Schulz-Wendtland R, Jud SM. Assessment of the additional clinical potential of X-ray dark-field imaging for breast cancer in a preclinical setup. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2020; 12:1758835920957932. [PMID: 32994806 PMCID: PMC7502853 DOI: 10.1177/1758835920957932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Mammography can identify calcifications up to 50–100 μm in size as a surrogate parameter for breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Microcalcifications measuring <50 µm are also associated with breast cancer or DCIS and are frequently not detected on mammography, although they can be detected with dark-field imaging. This study examined whether additional breast examination using X-ray dark-field imaging can increase the detection rate of calcifications. Advances in knowledge: (1) evaluation of additional modality of breast imaging; (2) specific evaluation of breast calcifications. Implications for patient care: the addition of X-ray dark-field imaging to conventional mammography could detect additional calcifications. Methods: Talbot–Lau X-ray phase–contrast imaging and X-ray dark-field imaging were used to acquire images of breast specimens. The radiation dosage with the technique is comparable with conventional mammography. Three X-ray gratings with periods of 5–10 µm between the X-ray tube and the flat-panel detector provide three different images in a single sequence: the conventional attenuation image, differential phase image, and dark-field image. The images were read by radiologists. Radiological findings were marked and examined pathologically. The results were described in a descriptive manner. Results: A total of 81 breast specimens were investigated with the two methods; 199 significant structures were processed pathologically, consisting of 123 benign and 76 malignant lesions (DCIS or invasive breast cancer). X-ray dark-field imaging identified 15 additional histologically confirmed carcinoma lesions that were visible but not declared suspicious on digital mammography alone. Another four malignant lesions that were not visible on mammography were exclusively detected with X-ray dark-field imaging. Conclusions: Adding X-ray dark-field imaging to digital mammography increases the detection rate for breast cancer and DCIS associated lesions with micrometer-sized calcifications. The use of X-ray dark-field imaging may be able to provide more accurate and detailed radiological classification of suspicious breast lesions. Adding X-ray dark-field imaging to mammography may be able to increase the detection rate and improve preoperative planning in deciding between mastectomy or breast-conserving therapy, particularly in patients with invasive lobular breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julius Emons
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Bayern, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, Erlangen 91054, Germany
| | - Marius Wunderle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Bayern, Germany
| | - Felix Heindl
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Bayern, Germany
| | - Jens Rieger
- Erlangen Center for Astroparticle Physics, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Florian Horn
- Erlangen Center for Astroparticle Physics, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Georg Pelzer
- Erlangen Center for Astroparticle Physics, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Andre Ritter
- Erlangen Center for Astroparticle Physics, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Thomas Weber
- Erlangen Center for Astroparticle Physics, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Iris Polifka
- Institute of Pathology, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
| | - David L Wachter
- Institute of Pathology, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Evelyn Wenkel
- Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Bayern, Germany
| | - Thilo Michel
- Erlangen Center for Astroparticle Physics, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael Uder
- Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Bayern, Germany
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Gisela Anton
- Erlangen Center for Astroparticle Physics, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Bayern, Germany
| | | | - Sebastian M Jud
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Bayern, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wunderle M, Häberle L, Hein A, Jud SM, Lux MP, Hack CC, Emons J, Heindl F, Nabieva N, Löhberg CR, Schulz-Wendtland R, Hartmann A, Beckmann MW, Fasching PA, Gaß P. Einfluss der Familienanamnese eines Mamma- oder Ovarialkarzinoms auf die pathologische Komplettremission und die Prognose bei Patientinnen mit einem Mammakarzinom nach neoadjuvanter Chemotherapie. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2020. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- M Wunderle
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erlangen
| | - L Häberle
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erlangen
- Biostatische Einheit, Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erlangen
| | - A Hein
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erlangen
| | - S M Jud
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erlangen
| | - M P Lux
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauen- und Kinderklinik St. Louise, Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten
| | - C C Hack
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erlangen
| | - J Emons
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erlangen
| | - F Heindl
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erlangen
| | - N Nabieva
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erlangen
| | - C R Löhberg
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erlangen
| | - R Schulz-Wendtland
- Institut für Diagnostische Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erlangen
| | - A Hartmann
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erlangen
| | - M W Beckmann
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erlangen
| | - P A Fasching
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erlangen
| | - P Gaß
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erlangen
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wunderle M, Häberle L, Hein A, Jud SM, Lux MP, Hack CC, Emons J, Heindl F, Nabieva N, Loehberg CR, Schulz-Wendtland R, Hartmann A, Beckmann MW, Fasching PA, Gass P. Influence of Family History of Breast or Ovarian Cancer on Pathological Complete Response and Long-Term Prognosis in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Breast Care (Basel) 2020; 16:254-262. [PMID: 34248466 DOI: 10.1159/000507475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2019] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose In breast cancer, a pathological complete response (pCR) has been described as generally resulting in a favorable prognosis. However, there are subgroups, such as patients with a mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2, in which the effect of pCR on the prognosis is suspected to be weaker. Patients with a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer may therefore react differently in relation to pCR and prognosis, and this is investigated in this study. Patients and Methods Breast cancer patients were identified from a clinical breast cancer registry. The study subjects had been treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy from 2001 to 2018 and their pathological and clinical information as well as medical family history were available. They were considered to have a positive family history if they had at least 1 first-degree relative with breast and/or ovarian cancer. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to study the association between family history, pCR (ypT0; ypN0), and disease-free survival (DFS). Results Of 1,480 patients, 228 (15.4%) had a positive family history. The pCR rates were 24.9% in all patients, and 24.4% and 27.6% in those without/with a family history, respectively. Family history was not associated with a higher pCR rate (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-1.76; p = 0.27) or a different disease-free survival (DFS; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.15; 95% CI 0.88-1.52; p = 0.30). pCR did not affect the prognosis differently in relation to family history. Conclusions In this retrospective analysis, family history was not associated with pCR and DFS. pCR improved survival, independently of family history.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marius Wunderle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lothar Häberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.,Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sebastian M Jud
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael P Lux
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Women's Hospital St. Louise Paderborn, Women's Hospital St. Josefs-Krankenhaus Salzkotten, Frauen- und Kinderklinik St. Louise, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Carolin C Hack
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Julius Emons
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Felix Heindl
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Naiba Nabieva
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Christian R Loehberg
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland
- Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Paul Gass
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Erber R, Kailayangiri S, Hübner H, Rübner M, Hartmann A, Häberle L, Meyer J, Mackensen A, Landgraf L, Schulz-Wendtland R, Beckmann MW, Fasching PA, Farwick N, Rössig C, Gaß P. Disialogangliosids GD2 beim Mammakarzinom und dessen Einfluss auf die Prognose. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2020. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- R Erber
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erlangen
| | - S Kailayangiri
- Universitätskinderklinik Münster, Pädiatische Hämatologie und Onkologie, Münster
| | - H Hübner
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erlangen
| | - M Rübner
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erlangen
| | - A Hartmann
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erlangen
| | - L Häberle
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erlangen
- Biostatische Einheit, Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erlangen
| | - J Meyer
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erlangen
- Biostatische Einheit, Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erlangen
| | - A Mackensen
- Medizinische Klinik 5, Hämatologie und Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erlangen
| | - L Landgraf
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erlangen
| | - R Schulz-Wendtland
- Institut für Diagnostische Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erlangen
| | - M W Beckmann
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erlangen
| | - P A Fasching
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erlangen
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - N Farwick
- Universitätskinderklinik Münster, Pädiatische Hämatologie und Onkologie, Münster
| | - C Rössig
- Universitätskinderklinik Münster, Pädiatische Hämatologie und Onkologie, Münster
| | - P Gaß
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erlangen
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Emons J, Schulz-Wendtland R, Rieger J, Radicke M, Wachter DL, Anton G, Beckmann MW, Hartmann A, Fasching PA, Jud SM. Dunkelfeld Messung von Brustdrüsengewebe zur Detektion von tumorassoziiertem Mikrokalk. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2020. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1714016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- J Emons
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen
| | - R Schulz-Wendtland
- Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen
| | - J Rieger
- Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen
| | | | - D L Wachter
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen
| | - G Anton
- Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen
| | - M W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen
| | - A Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen
| | - P A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen
| | - S M Jud
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Schrauder MG, Brunel-Geuder L, Häberle L, Wunderle M, Hoyer J, Csorba R, Reis A, Schulz-Wendtland R, Beckmann MW, Lux MP. Cost effectiveness of bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy. Eur J Med Res 2019; 24:32. [PMID: 31521205 PMCID: PMC6744699 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-019-0391-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2019] [Accepted: 09/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Growing demand for risk-reducing surgery in individuals with inherited susceptibility to cancer leads to the question whether these procedures are cost effective for the executing hospitals. This study compared the clinical costs for bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy (BRRM) with and without different types of reconstruction, risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO), and their combinations with corresponding reimbursements in the statutory health-care system in Germany. Patients and methods Real total costs of care for BRRM with and without reconstruction, RRSO, and their combinations were calculated as the sum of all personnel and technical costs. These costs calculated in a German University hospital were compared with the sum of all reimbursements in the German DRG-based health-care system. Results While sole RRSO, BRRM without reconstruction, and BRRM with secondary DIEP (deep inferior epigastric perforator)—reconstruction still result in a small benefit, we even found shortfalls for the hospital with all other prophylactic operations under consideration. The calculated deficits were especially high for BRRM with implant-based breast reconstruction and for combined operations when the risk reduction is achieved with a minimum of separate operations. Conclusions Risk-reducing surgery in BRCA-mutation carriers is frequently not cost-covering for the executing hospitals in the German health-care system. Thus, appropriate concepts are required to ensure a nationwide care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael G Schrauder
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Universitätsstraße 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. .,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of Aschaffenburg-Alzenau, Aschaffenburg, Germany.
| | - Lisa Brunel-Geuder
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Universitätsstraße 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lothar Häberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Universitätsstraße 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Marius Wunderle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Universitätsstraße 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Juliane Hoyer
- Institute of Human Genetics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Roland Csorba
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of Aschaffenburg-Alzenau, Aschaffenburg, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - André Reis
- Institute of Human Genetics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland
- Institute of Radiology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Universitätsstraße 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael P Lux
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Universitätsstraße 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Erber R, Hartmann A, Beckmann MW, Mackensen A, Kremer A, Reimann H, Hübner H, Hein A, Lux MP, Jud S, Häberle L, Gaß P, Volz B, Schulz-Wendtland R, Rübner M, Fasching PA. [TILGen study-immunological targets in patients with breast cancer : Influence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes]. Pathologe 2019; 39:236-240. [PMID: 30406831 DOI: 10.1007/s00292-018-0526-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The interaction of our immune system with breast cancer (BC) cells prompted the investigation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and targeted, tumor antigen-specific immunotherapy. OBJECTIVES Correlation between TILs and pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NACT). Tumor-specific antigens (TSAs) in HER2+ and triple negative BC and establishment of TSA-specific therapies within the interdisciplinary TILGen study. METHODS Illustration of the TILGen study design. Assessment of TILs and correlation with pCR within this BC study. RESULTS pCR was achieved in 38.4% (56/146) and associated with estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor negative (ER-/PR-) and HER2+ tumors. Lymphocytic predominant BC (LPBC) was found in 16.4% (24/146), particularly in ER-/PR- (ER-: 27.3% vs. ER+: 9.9%, PR-: 22.3% vs. PR+: 8.2%), large, and poorly differentiated BC. TILs were significantly correlated with pCR in multivariate analysis. In LPBC, pCR was achieved in 66.7%, whereas it was 32.8% in non-LPBC. CONCLUSIONS First results confirm the influence of the human immune system on the response to NACT in HER2+ and triple negative BC. TSA-specific immunotherapy might improve the outcome in BC patients but there is an urgent need for comprehensive studies to further investigate this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Erber
- Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Krankenhausstraße 8-10, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
| | - A Hartmann
- Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Krankenhausstraße 8-10, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - M W Beckmann
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - A Mackensen
- Medizinische Klinik 5, Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - A Kremer
- Medizinische Klinik 5, Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - H Reimann
- Medizinische Klinik 5, Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - H Hübner
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - A Hein
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - M P Lux
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - S Jud
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - L Häberle
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - P Gaß
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - B Volz
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - R Schulz-Wendtland
- Radiologisches Institut/Gynäkologische Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - M Rübner
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - P A Fasching
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Dietzel M, Ellmann S, Schulz-Wendtland R, Clauser P, Wenkel E, Uder M, Baltzer PAT. Breast MRI in the era of diffusion weighted imaging: do we still need signal-intensity time curves? Eur Radiol 2019; 30:47-56. [PMID: 31359125 PMCID: PMC6890589 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06346-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2019] [Revised: 06/12/2019] [Accepted: 06/27/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Objective Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging of the initial (IP) and delayed phase (DP) is an integral part of any clinical breast MRI protocol. Furthermore, DWI is increasingly used as an add-on sequence by the breast-imaging community. We investigated whether DWI could be used as a substitute DP. Material and methods One hundred thirty-two consecutive patients with equivocal or suspicious findings at ultrasound and/or mammography received a full diagnostic breast MRI according to international recommendations. Histopathological verification served as reference standard. We evaluated three sections of the MRI protocol: IP, DP, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps derived from DWI. Circular ROIs (regions of interest, mean size 5–10 mm2) were drawn into the enhancing parts of the lesion (first postcontrast). ROIs were transferred to the corresponding location on ADC maps and IP and DP images. Mean ROI values were investigated signal intensity (SI): (1) Initial-phase enhancement = (SI(IP) − SI(precontrast))/SI(precontrast); (2) Delayed-phase enhancement = (SI(DP) − SI(IP))/SI(IP); (3) ADC. Multiparametric combinations were computed using logistic regression analysis: (1) IP+: Initial-phase enhancement and ADC; (2) Curve: Initial-phase enhancement and delayed-phase enhancement; (3) Curve+: Curve and ADC. The diagnostic performances of these feature combinations to diagnose malignancy were compared by the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC). Results One hundred thirty-two patients (age: mean = 57.1 years, range 23–83 years) with 145 lesions were included (malignant/benign 101/44). IP+ (AUC = 0.877) outperformed Curve (AUC = 0.788, p = 0.03). Curve+ was not superior to IP+ (p = 1). Conclusion DWI could substitute DP. Because DWI is typically used as an add-on to IP and DP, our results might help to abbreviate and to simplify current practice of breast MRI. Key Points • DWI provides similar but superior diagnostic information for diagnosis of malignancy in enhancing breast lesions compared to DP. • Adding DP to DWI does not provide incremental information to distinguish benign from malignant lesions. • DWI could substitute DP. As DWI is typically used as an add-on to IP and DP, our findings might help to abbreviate and to simplify current breast MRI practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Dietzel
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Maximiliansplatz 1, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Stephan Ellmann
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Maximiliansplatz 1, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Maximiliansplatz 1, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Paola Clauser
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer-Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Evelyn Wenkel
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Maximiliansplatz 1, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael Uder
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Maximiliansplatz 1, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Pascal A T Baltzer
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer-Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Dietzel M, Wenkel E, Hammon M, Clauser P, Uder M, Schulz-Wendtland R, Baltzer PA. Does higher field strength translate into better diagnostic accuracy? A prospective comparison of breast MRI at 3 and 1.5 Tesla. Eur J Radiol 2019; 114:51-56. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.02.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2018] [Revised: 02/22/2019] [Accepted: 02/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
20
|
Lux MP, Emons J, Bani MR, Wunderle M, Sell C, Preuss C, Rauh C, Jud SM, Heindl F, Langemann H, Geyer T, Brandl AL, Hack CC, Adler W, Schulz-Wendtland R, Beckmann MW, Fasching PA, Gass P. Diagnostic Accuracy of Breast Medical Tactile Examiners (MTEs): A Prospective Pilot Study. Breast Care (Basel) 2019; 14:41-47. [PMID: 31019442 DOI: 10.1159/000495883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The usefulness of clinical breast examination (CBE) in general and in breast cancer screening programs has been a matter of debate. This study investigated whether adding vision-impaired medical tactile examiners (MTEs) improves the predictiveness of CBE for suspicious lesions and analyzed the feasibility and acceptability of this approach. Methods The prospective study included 104 patients. Physicians and MTEs performed CBEs, and mammography and ultrasound results were used as the gold standard. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated and logistic regression models were used to compare the predictive value of CBE by physicians alone, MTEs alone, and physicians and MTEs combined. Results For CBEs by physicians alone, MTEs alone, and both combined, sensitivity was 71, 82, and 89% and specificity was 55, 45, and 35%, respectively. Using adjusted logistic regression models, the validated areas under the curve were 0.685, 0.692, and 0.710 (median bootstrapped p value (DeLong) = 0.381). Conclusion The predictive value for a suspicious breast lesion in CBEs performed by MTEs in patients without prior surgery was similar to that of physician-conducted CBEs. Including MTEs in the CBE procedure in breast units thus appears feasible and could be a way of utilizing their skills.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael P Lux
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| | - Julius Emons
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| | - Mayada R Bani
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| | - Marius Wunderle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| | - Charlotte Sell
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| | - Caroline Preuss
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| | - Claudia Rauh
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| | - Sebastian M Jud
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| | - Felix Heindl
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| | - Hanna Langemann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| | - Thomas Geyer
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| | - Anna-Lisa Brandl
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| | - Carolin C Hack
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| | - Werner Adler
- Institute of Biometry and Epidemiology, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| | | | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| | - Paul Gass
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Emons J, Wunderle M, Hartmann A, Radicke M, Rauh C, Uder M, Gass P, Fasching PA, Langemann H, Beckmann MW, Schulz-Wendtland R, Jud SM. Initial clinical results with a fusion prototype for mammography and three-dimensional ultrasound with a standard mammography system and a standard ultrasound probe. Acta Radiol 2018; 59:1406-1413. [PMID: 29498297 DOI: 10.1177/0284185118762249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Combinations *Equal contributors. of different imaging techniques in fusion devices appear to be associated with improvements in diagnostic assessment. PURPOSE The aim of this study was to test the feasibility of using an automated standard three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound (US) device fused with standard mammography for the first time in breast cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS Digital mammograms and 3D automated US images were obtained in 23 patients with highly suspicious breast lesions. A recently developed fusion machine consisting of an ABVS 3D US transducer from an Acuson S2000 machine and a conventional Mammomat Inspiration device (both Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany) were used for the purpose. The feasibility of the examinations, imaging coverage, and patients' experience of the procedure were examined. RESULTS In 15 out of 19 patients, the region of interest (ROI) with the tumor marked in the mammogram was visible on US. The examination was experienced positively by the patients, with no unexpected pain or injury. The examination was time-saving and well tolerated. CONCLUSION In conclusion, we have shown initial clinical feasibility of an US/radiography fusion prototype with good localization and evaluation of the ROIs. The combined examination was well tolerated. The simultaneous evaluation with mammography and US imaging may be able to improve detection and reduce examiner-related variability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julius Emons
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Marius Wunderle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Claudia Rauh
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael Uder
- Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Paul Gass
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Hanna Langemann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Sebastian M Jud
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Huebner H, Erber R, Hein A, Lux MP, Jud S, Kremer AN, Kranich H, Mackensen A, Häberle L, Hack C, Rauh C, Wunderle M, Gaß P, Rabizadeh S, Brandl AL, Langemann H, Volz B, Nabieva N, Schulz-Wendtland R, Dudziak D, Beckmann MW, Hartmann A, Fasching PA, Rübner M. TILGen: A Program to Investigate Immune Targets in Breast Cancer Patients – First Results on the Influence of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1675457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- H Huebner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - R Erber
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - A Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - MP Lux
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - S Jud
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - AN Kremer
- Department of Internal Medicine 5, Haematology and Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - H Kranich
- Department of Internal Medicine 5, Haematology and Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - A Mackensen
- Department of Internal Medicine 5, Haematology and Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - L Häberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - C Hack
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - C Rauh
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - M Wunderle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - P Gaß
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - AL Brandl
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - H Langemann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - B Volz
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - N Nabieva
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - R Schulz-Wendtland
- Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - D Dudziak
- Department of Dermatology, Laboratory of Dendritic Cell Biology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - MW Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - A Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - PA Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - M Rübner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wöckel A, Festl J, Stüber T, Brust K, Krockenberger M, Heuschmann PU, Jírů-Hillmann S, Albert US, Budach W, Follmann M, Janni W, Kopp I, Kreienberg R, Kühn T, Langer T, Nothacker M, Scharl A, Schreer I, Link H, Engel J, Fehm T, Weis J, Welt A, Steckelberg A, Feyer P, König K, Hahne A, Baumgartner T, Kreipe HH, Knoefel WT, Denkinger M, Brucker S, Lüftner D, Kubisch C, Gerlach C, Lebeau A, Siedentopf F, Petersen C, Bartsch HH, Schulz-Wendtland R, Hahn M, Hanf V, Müller-Schimpfle M, Henscher U, Roncarati R, Katalinic A, Heitmann C, Honegger C, Paradies K, Bjelic-Radisic V, Degenhardt F, Wenz F, Rick O, Hölzel D, Zaiss M, Kemper G, Budach V, Denkert C, Gerber B, Tesch H, Hirsmüller S, Sinn HP, Dunst J, Münstedt K, Bick U, Fallenberg E, Tholen R, Hung R, Baumann F, Beckmann MW, Blohmer J, Fasching P, Lux MP, Harbeck N, Hadji P, Hauner H, Heywang-Köbrunner S, Huober J, Hübner J, Jackisch C, Loibl S, Lück HJ, von Minckwitz G, Möbus V, Müller V, Nöthlings U, Schmidt M, Schmutzler R, Schneeweiss A, Schütz F, Stickeler E, Thomssen C, Untch M, Wesselmann S, Bücker A, Buck A, Stangl S. Interdisciplinary Screening, Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Breast Cancer. Guideline of the DGGG and the DKG (S3-Level, AWMF Registry Number 032/045OL, December 2017) - Part 2 with Recommendations for the Therapy of Primary, Recurrent and Advanced Breast Cancer. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018; 78:1056-1088. [PMID: 30581198 PMCID: PMC6261741 DOI: 10.1055/a-0646-4630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2018] [Accepted: 06/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this official guideline coordinated and published by the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) and the German Cancer Society (DKG) was to optimize the screening, diagnosis, therapy and follow-up care of breast cancer. Method The process of updating the S3 guideline published in 2012 was based on the adaptation of identified source guidelines. They were combined with reviews of evidence compiled using PICO (Patients/Interventions/Control/Outcome) questions and with the results of a systematic search of literature databases followed by the selection and evaluation of the identified literature. The interdisciplinary working groups took the identified materials as their starting point and used them to develop suggestions for recommendations and statements, which were then modified and graded in a structured consensus process procedure. Recommendations Part 2 of this short version of the guideline presents recommendations for the therapy of primary, recurrent and metastatic breast cancer. Loco-regional therapies are de-escalated in the current guideline. In addition to reducing the safety margins for surgical procedures, the guideline also recommends reducing the radicality of axillary surgery. The choice and extent of systemic therapy depends on the respective tumor biology. New substances are becoming available, particularly to treat metastatic breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Achim Wöckel
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Würzburg, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jasmin Festl
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Würzburg, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Tanja Stüber
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Würzburg, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Katharina Brust
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Würzburg, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Peter U. Heuschmann
- Institut für Klinische Epidemiologie und Biometrie (IKE-B), Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Steffi Jírů-Hillmann
- Institut für Klinische Epidemiologie und Biometrie (IKE-B), Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Wilfried Budach
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | | | - Ina Kopp
- AWMF-Institut für Medizinisches Wissensmanagement, Marburg, Germany
| | | | - Thorsten Kühn
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Langer
- Office des Leitlinienprogrammes Onkologie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Monika Nothacker
- AWMF-Institut für Medizinisches Wissensmanagement, Marburg, Germany
| | - Anton Scharl
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum St. Marien Amberg, Amberg, Germany
| | | | - Hartmut Link
- Praxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Jutta Engel
- Tumorregister München, Institut für medizinische Informationsverarbeitung, Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Tanja Fehm
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Joachim Weis
- Stiftungsprofessur Selbsthilfeforschung, Tumorzentrum/CCC Freiburg, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anja Welt
- Innere Klinik (Tumorforschung), Westdeutsches Tumorzentrum, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Petra Feyer
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Vivantes Klinikum, Neukölln Berlin, Germany
| | - Klaus König
- Berufsverband der Frauenärzte, Steinbach, Germany
| | | | | | - Hans H. Kreipe
- Institut für Pathologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Wolfram Trudo Knoefel
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Michael Denkinger
- AGAPLESION Bethesda Klinik, Geriatrie der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Sara Brucker
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Universitätsklinikum Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Kubisch
- Institut für Humangenetik, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christina Gerlach
- III. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, uct, Interdisziplinäre Abteilung für Palliativmedizin, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg Universität, Mainz, Germany
| | - Annette Lebeau
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Cordula Petersen
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Markus Hahn
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Volker Hanf
- Frauenklinik Nathanstift, Klinikum Fürth, Fürth, Germany
| | | | | | - Renza Roncarati
- Frauenselbsthilfe nach Krebs – Bundesverband e. V., Bonn, Germany
| | - Alexander Katalinic
- Institut für Sozialmedizin und Epidemiologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Christoph Heitmann
- Ästhetisch plastische und rekonstruktive Chirurgie, Camparihaus München, München, Germany
| | | | - Kerstin Paradies
- Konferenz Onkologischer Kranken- und Kinderkrankenpflege, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Vesna Bjelic-Radisic
- Universitätsfrauenklinik, Abteilung für Gynäkologie, Medizinische Universität Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Friedrich Degenhardt
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Frederik Wenz
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Oliver Rick
- Klinik Reinhardshöhe Bad Wildungen, Bad Wildungen, Germany
| | - Dieter Hölzel
- Tumorregister München, Institut für medizinische Informationsverarbeitung, Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Matthias Zaiss
- Praxis für interdisziplinäre Onkologie & Hämatologie, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Volker Budach
- Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Universitätsfrauenklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Centrum für Hämatologie und Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Hans-Peter Sinn
- Pathologisches Institut, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Dunst
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Karsten Münstedt
- Frauenklinik Offenburg, Ortenau Klinikum Offenburg-Gengenbach, Offenburg, Germany
| | - Ulrich Bick
- Klinik für Radiologie, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Eva Fallenberg
- Klinik für Radiologie, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Reina Tholen
- Deutscher Verband für Physiotherapie, Referat Bildung und Wissenschaft, Köln, Germany
| | - Roswita Hung
- Frauenselbsthilfe nach Krebs, Wolfsburg, Germany
| | - Freerk Baumann
- Centrum für Integrierte Onkologie Köln, Uniklinik Köln, Köln, Germany
| | - Matthias W. Beckmann
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, CCC Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Jens Blohmer
- Klinik für Gynäkologie incl. Brustzentrum, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Fasching
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, CCC Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael P. Lux
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, CCC Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Frauenklinik, Universität München (LMU), München, Germany
| | - Peyman Hadji
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Hans Hauner
- Lehrstuhl für Ernährungsmedizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
| | | | | | - Jutta Hübner
- Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Volker Möbus
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ute Nöthlings
- Institut für Ernährungs- und Lebensmittelwissenschaften, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Geburtshilfe und Frauengesundheit, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mai, Germany nz, Mainz
| | - Rita Schmutzler
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Michael Untch
- Klinik für Geburtshilfe und Gynäkologie, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Arno Bücker
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie am UKS, Universität des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Buck
- Nuklearmedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik des Universitätsklinikums Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Stephanie Stangl
- Institut für Klinische Epidemiologie und Biometrie (IKE-B), Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Fasching PA, Hartkopf AD, Gass P, Häberle L, Akpolat-Basci L, Hein A, Volz B, Taran FA, Nabieva N, Pott B, Overkamp F, Einarson H, Hadji P, Tesch H, Ettl J, Lüftner D, Wallwiener M, Müller V, Janni W, Fehm TN, Schneeweiss A, Untch M, Pott D, Lux MP, Geyer T, Liedtke C, Seeger H, Wetzig S, Hartmann A, Schulz-Wendtland R, Belleville E, Wallwiener D, Beckmann MW, Brucker SY, Kolberg HC. Efficacy of neoadjuvant pertuzumab in addition to chemotherapy and trastuzumab in routine clinical treatment of patients with primary breast cancer: a multicentric analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 173:319-328. [PMID: 30324275 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-5008-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2018] [Accepted: 10/10/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Neoadjuvant combination treatment with chemotherapy (CTX), trastuzumab (TZM), and pertuzumab (PTZ) has been shown to result in higher pathological complete response rates (pCR) in comparison with treatment with chemotherapy and trastuzumab (CTX/TZM). This analysis was aimed at real-world validation of these results from prospective randomized trials. METHODS In a retrospective analysis conducted in the PRAEGNANT network, patients were eligible for inclusion if they had either received neoadjuvant therapy with CTX/TZM or chemotherapy, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab (CTX/TZM/PTZ) and subsequently underwent surgery for their primary breast cancer. The effect of the two neoadjuvant regimens on pCR in addition to commonly applicable predictors of pCR was analyzed in 300 patients from three study sites, using logistic regression analyses with treatment arm, age, clinical tumor stage, grading, and hormone receptor status as predictors. RESULTS pCR with complete disappearance of all tumor cells was seen in 30.2% (n = 58) of patients treated with CTX/TZM and in 52.8% (n = 57) of those treated with CTX/TZM/PTZ. CTX/TZM/PTZ was positively associated with pCR (adjusted odds ratio 2.44; 95% CI 1.49-4.02). Mastectomy rates were not influenced by the therapy. CONCLUSIONS The results of clinical trials were confirmed in this dataset of patients who were treated outside of clinical trials in everyday routine work. pCR rates can be improved by 20% with pertuzumab in routine clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Andreas D Hartkopf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Paul Gass
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lothar Häberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.,Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Bernhard Volz
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Florin-Andrei Taran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Naiba Nabieva
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | - Hanna Einarson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Peyman Hadji
- Frankfurter Hormon und Osteoporosezentrum Goethestrasse, Goethestr.23, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice, Bethanien Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Johannes Ettl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charité University Hospital, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Tanja N Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Düsseldorf University Hospital, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases and Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Helios Clinics Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dirk Pott
- Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany
| | - Michael P Lux
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Thomas Geyer
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Cornelia Liedtke
- Department of Gynecology and Breast Center, Charité University Hospital, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - Harald Seeger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland
- Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Diethelm Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sara Y Brucker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Gaß P, Emons J, Bani MR, Wunderle M, Sell C, Preuss C, Rauh C, Schrauder MG, Jud SM, Hack CC, Adler W, Schulz-Wendtland R, Beckmann MW, Fasching PA, Lux MP. The diagnostic accuracy of breast medical tactile examiners (MTE) – A first prospective monocentric study. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1671219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- P Gaß
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - J Emons
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - MR Bani
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - M Wunderle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - C Sell
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - C Preuss
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - C Rauh
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - MG Schrauder
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aschaffenburg, Deutschland
| | - SM Jud
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - CC Hack
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - W Adler
- Institute of Biometry and Epidemiology, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - R Schulz-Wendtland
- Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - MW Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - PA Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - MP Lux
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Emons J, Wunderle M, Emons PA, Heindl F, Rieger J, Horn F, Pelzer G, Ritter A, Weber T, Radicke M, Polifka I, Wachter DL, Wenkel E, Michel T, Uder M, Hartmann A, Anton G, Beckmann MW, Schulz-Wendtland R, Jud SM. Assessment of clinical potential of X-ray dark-field imaging for breast cancer. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1671218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- J Emons
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - M Wunderle
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - PA Emons
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - F Heindl
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - J Rieger
- Physikalisches Institut, Lehrstuhl für Experimentalphysik (Teilchen- und Astroteilchenphysik), Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - F Horn
- Physikalisches Institut, Lehrstuhl für Experimentalphysik (Teilchen- und Astroteilchenphysik), Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - G Pelzer
- Physikalisches Institut, Lehrstuhl für Experimentalphysik (Teilchen- und Astroteilchenphysik), Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - A Ritter
- Physikalisches Institut, Lehrstuhl für Experimentalphysik (Teilchen- und Astroteilchenphysik), Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - T Weber
- Physikalisches Institut, Lehrstuhl für Experimentalphysik (Teilchen- und Astroteilchenphysik), Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - M Radicke
- Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - I Polifka
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Pathologie, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - DL Wachter
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Pathologie, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - E Wenkel
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Radiologie, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - T Michel
- Physikalisches Institut, Lehrstuhl für Experimentalphysik (Teilchen- und Astroteilchenphysik), Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - M Uder
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Radiologie, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - A Hartmann
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Pathologie, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - G Anton
- Physikalisches Institut, Lehrstuhl für Experimentalphysik (Teilchen- und Astroteilchenphysik), Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - MW Beckmann
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | | | - SM Jud
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Erlangen, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Wöckel A, Festl J, Stüber T, Brust K, Stangl S, Heuschmann PU, Albert US, Budach W, Follmann M, Janni W, Kopp I, Kreienberg R, Kühn T, Langer T, Nothacker M, Scharl A, Schreer I, Link H, Engel J, Fehm T, Weis J, Welt A, Steckelberg A, Feyer P, König K, Hahne A, Kreipe HH, Knoefel WT, Denkinger M, Brucker S, Lüftner D, Kubisch C, Gerlach C, Lebeau A, Siedentopf F, Petersen C, Bartsch HH, Schulz-Wendtland R, Hahn M, Hanf V, Müller-Schimpfle M, Henscher U, Roncarati R, Katalinic A, Heitmann C, Honegger C, Paradies K, Bjelic-Radisic V, Degenhardt F, Wenz F, Rick O, Hölzel D, Zaiss M, Kemper G, Budach V, Denkert C, Gerber B, Tesch H, Hirsmüller S, Sinn HP, Dunst J, Münstedt K, Bick U, Fallenberg E, Tholen R, Hung R, Baumann F, Beckmann MW, Blohmer J, Fasching PA, Lux MP, Harbeck N, Hadji P, Hauner H, Heywang-Köbrunner S, Huober J, Hübner J, Jackisch C, Loibl S, Lück HJ, von Minckwitz G, Möbus V, Müller V, Nöthlings U, Schmidt M, Schmutzler R, Schneeweiss A, Schütz F, Stickeler E, Thomssen C, Untch M, Wesselmann S, Bücker A, Krockenberger M. Interdisciplinary Screening, Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Breast Cancer. Guideline of the DGGG and the DKG (S3-Level, AWMF Registry Number 032/045OL, December 2017) - Part 1 with Recommendations for the Screening, Diagnosis and Therapy of Breast Cancer. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018; 78:927-948. [PMID: 30369626 PMCID: PMC6202580 DOI: 10.1055/a-0646-4522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2018] [Accepted: 06/20/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this official guideline coordinated and published by the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) and the German Cancer Society (DKG) was to optimize the screening, diagnosis, therapy and follow-up care of breast cancer. Methods The process of updating the S3 guideline dating from 2012 was based on the adaptation of identified source guidelines which were combined with reviews of evidence compiled using PICO (Patients/Interventions/Control/Outcome) questions and the results of a systematic search of literature databases and the selection and evaluation of the identified literature. The interdisciplinary working groups took the identified materials as their starting point to develop recommendations and statements which were modified and graded in a structured consensus procedure. Recommendations Part 1 of this short version of the guideline presents recommendations for the screening, diagnosis and follow-up care of breast cancer. The importance of mammography for screening is confirmed in this updated version of the guideline and forms the basis for all screening. In addition to the conventional methods used to diagnose breast cancer, computed tomography (CT) is recommended for staging in women with a higher risk of recurrence. The follow-up concept includes suggested intervals between physical, ultrasound and mammography examinations, additional high-tech diagnostic procedures, and the determination of tumor markers for the evaluation of metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Achim Wöckel
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Würzburg, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jasmin Festl
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Würzburg, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Tanja Stüber
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Würzburg, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Katharina Brust
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Würzburg, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Stephanie Stangl
- Institut für Klinische Epidemiologie und Biometrie (IKE-B), Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Peter U. Heuschmann
- Institut für Klinische Epidemiologie und Biometrie (IKE-B), Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Wilfried Budach
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | | | - Ina Kopp
- AWMF-Institut für Medizinisches Wissensmanagement, Marburg, Germany
| | | | - Thorsten Kühn
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Langer
- Office des Leitlinienprogrammes Onkologie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Monika Nothacker
- AWMF-Institut für Medizinisches Wissensmanagement, Marburg, Germany
| | - Anton Scharl
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum St. Marien Amberg, Amberg, Germany
| | | | - Hartmut Link
- Praxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Jutta Engel
- Tumorregister München, Institut für medizinische Informationsverarbeitung, Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Tanja Fehm
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Joachim Weis
- Stiftungsprofessur Selbsthilfeforschung, Tumorzentrum/CCC Freiburg, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anja Welt
- Innere Klinik (Tumorforschung), Westdeutsches Tumorzentrum, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Petra Feyer
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Vivantes Klinikum, Neukölln Berlin, Germany
| | - Klaus König
- Berufsverband der Frauenärzte, Steinbach, Germany
| | | | - Hans H. Kreipe
- Institut für Pathologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Wolfram Trudo Knoefel
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Michael Denkinger
- AGAPLESION Bethesda Klinik, Geriatrie der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Sara Brucker
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Universitätsklinikum Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Kubisch
- Institut für Humangenetik, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christina Gerlach
- III. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, uct, Interdisziplinäre Abteilung für Palliativmedizin, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg Universität, Mainz, Germany
| | - Annette Lebeau
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Cordula Petersen
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Markus Hahn
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Volker Hanf
- Frauenklinik Nathanstift, Klinikum Fürth, Fürth, Germany
| | | | | | - Renza Roncarati
- Frauenselbsthilfe nach Krebs – Bundesverband e. V., Bonn, Germany
| | - Alexander Katalinic
- Institut für Sozialmedizin und Epidemiologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Christoph Heitmann
- Ästhetisch plastische und rekonstruktive Chirurgie, Camparihaus München, München, Germany
| | | | - Kerstin Paradies
- Konferenz Onkologischer Kranken- und Kinderkrankenpflege, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Vesna Bjelic-Radisic
- Universitätsfrauenklinik, Abteilung für Gynäkologie, Medizinische Universität Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Friedrich Degenhardt
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Frederik Wenz
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Oliver Rick
- Klinik Reinhardshöhe Bad Wildungen, Bad Wildungen, Germany
| | - Dieter Hölzel
- Tumorregister München, Institut für medizinische Informationsverarbeitung, Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Matthias Zaiss
- Praxis für interdisziplinäre Onkologie & Hämatologie, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Volker Budach
- Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Universitätsfrauenklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Centrum für Hämatologie und Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Hans-Peter Sinn
- Pathologisches Institut, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Dunst
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Karsten Münstedt
- Frauenklinik Offenburg, Ortenau Klinikum Offenburg-Gengenbach, Offenburg, Germany
| | - Ulrich Bick
- Klinik für Radiologie, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Eva Fallenberg
- Klinik für Radiologie, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Reina Tholen
- Deutscher Verband für Physiotherapie, Referat Bildung und Wissenschaft, Köln, Germany
| | - Roswita Hung
- Frauenselbsthilfe nach Krebs, Wolfsburg, Germany
| | - Freerk Baumann
- Centrum für Integrierte Onkologie Köln, Uniklinik Köln, Köln, Germany
| | - Matthias W. Beckmann
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, CCC Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Jens Blohmer
- Klinik für Gynäkologie incl. Brustzentrum, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, CCC Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael P. Lux
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, CCC Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Frauenklinik, Universität München (LMU), München, Germany
| | - Peyman Hadji
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Hans Hauner
- Lehrstuhl für Ernährungsmedizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
| | | | | | - Jutta Hübner
- Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Volker Möbus
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ute Nöthlings
- Institut für Ernährungs- und Lebensmittelwissenschaften, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Geburtshilfe und Frauengesundheit, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Rita Schmutzler
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Michael Untch
- Klinik für Geburtshilfe und Gynäkologie, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Arno Bücker
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie am UKS, Universität des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Häberle L, Erber R, Gaß P, Hein A, Jud SM, Lux MP, Langemann H, Rauh C, Hack CC, Schulz-Wendtland R, Hartmann A, Beckmann MW, Fasching PA. Prädiktionsmodelle zur Vorhersage von pathologischer Komplettremission bei Brustkrebspatientinnen nach neoadjuvanter Chemotherapie. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1671025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- L Häberle
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, CCC Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - R Erber
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Pathologisches Institut, CCC Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - P Gaß
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, CCC Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - A Hein
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, CCC Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - SM Jud
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, CCC Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - MP Lux
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, CCC Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - H Langemann
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, CCC Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - C Rauh
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, CCC Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - CC Hack
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, CCC Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - R Schulz-Wendtland
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Radiologisches Institut, CCC Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - A Hartmann
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Pathologisches Institut, CCC Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - MW Beckmann
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, CCC Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - PA Fasching
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, CCC Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Huebner H, Ruebner M, Hein A, Haeberle L, Bayer CM, Koch M, Schneider M, Schwenke E, Schulz-Wendtland R, Beckmann MW, Penninger J, Jud SM, Fasching PA. Serum RANKL und OPG als Marker für das Brustwachstum während der Schwangerschaft. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1671169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- H Huebner
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - M Ruebner
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - A Hein
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - L Haeberle
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - CM Bayer
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - M Koch
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - M Schneider
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - E Schwenke
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - R Schulz-Wendtland
- Radiologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - MW Beckmann
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - J Penninger
- Institut für Molekulare Biotechnologie GmbH (IMBA) der Österreichischen Akademie für Wissenschaft, Wien, Österreich
| | - SM Jud
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - PA Fasching
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Emons J, Wunderle M, Hartmann A, Radice M, Rauh C, Uder M, Gass P, Fasching PA, Langemann H, Beckmann MW, Schulz-Wendtland R, Jud SM. Initial clinical results with a fusion prototype for mammography and three-dimensional ultrasound with a standard mammography system and a standard ultrasound probe. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1671216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- J Emons
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - M Wunderle
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - A Hartmann
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Pathologie, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - M Radice
- Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - C Rauh
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - M Uder
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Radiologie, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - P Gass
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - PA Fasching
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - H Langemann
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - MW Beckmann
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | | | - SM Jud
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Erlangen, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Häberle L, Erber R, Gaß P, Hein A, Jud S, Langemann H, Rauh C, Hack C, Schulz-Wendtland R, Hartmann A, Beckmann M, Lux M, Fasching P. A prediction model for pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy of HER2-negative breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy270.221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
32
|
Huebner H, Erber R, Würfel F, Hein A, Lux MP, Jud S, Kremer A, Kranich H, Mackensen A, Häberle L, Hack CC, Rauh C, Wunderle M, Gaß P, Rabizadeh S, Brandl AL, Langemann H, Volz B, Nabieva N, Schulz-Wendtland R, Dudziak D, Beckmann MW, Hartmann A, Fasching PA, Rübner M. TILGen: Eine Studie zur Untersuchung immunonkologischer Marker für die Behandlung des Mammakarzinoms – Erste Ergebnisse zum Einfluss Tumor-infiltrierender Lymphozyten. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1671057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- H Huebner
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - R Erber
- Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - F Würfel
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - A Hein
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - MP Lux
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - S Jud
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - A Kremer
- Medizinische Klinik 5, Hämatologie und Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - H Kranich
- Medizinische Klinik 5, Hämatologie und Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - A Mackensen
- Medizinische Klinik 5, Hämatologie und Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - L Häberle
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - CC Hack
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - C Rauh
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - M Wunderle
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - P Gaß
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - S Rabizadeh
- NantOmics, LLC, Santa Cruz, Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika
| | - AL Brandl
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - H Langemann
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - B Volz
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - N Nabieva
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - R Schulz-Wendtland
- Radiologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - D Dudziak
- Dermatologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - MW Beckmann
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - A Hartmann
- Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - PA Fasching
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - M Rübner
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Schulz-Wendtland R, Preuß CI, Fasching PA, Loehberg CR, Jud SM, Lux MP, Beckmann MW, Uder M, Müller-Schimpfle M. Galaktografie mit Tomosythese (Galaktomosynthese) – Renaissance einer Methode? Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1671514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- R Schulz-Wendtland
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Radiologisches Institut/Gynäkologische Radiologie, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - CI Preuß
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - PA Fasching
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - CR Loehberg
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - SM Jud
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - MP Lux
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - MW Beckmann
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - M Uder
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Radiologisches Institut, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - M Müller-Schimpfle
- Klinikum Frankfurt Hoechst, Klinik für Radiologie, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Schulz-Wendtland R, Preuss C, Fasching PA, Loehberg CR, Lux MP, Emons J, Beckmann MW, Uder M, Mueller-Schimpfle M. Galactography with Tomosynthesis Technique (Galactomosynthesis) - Renaissance of a Method? Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018; 78:493-498. [PMID: 29880984 PMCID: PMC5986572 DOI: 10.1055/a-0594-2277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2018] [Revised: 03/12/2018] [Accepted: 03/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction
For decades, conventional galactography was the only imaging technique capable of showing the mammary ducts. Today, diagnosis is based on a multimodal concept which combines high-resolution ultrasound with magnetic resonance (MR) mammography and ductoscopy/galactoscopy and has a sensitivity and specificity of up to 95%. This study used tomosynthesis in galactography for the first time and compared the synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms generated with this technique with the images created using the established method of ductal sonography. Both methods should be able to detect invasive breast cancers and their precursors such as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) as well as being able to identify benign findings.
Material and Methods
Five patients with pathological nipple discharge were examined using ductal sonography, contrast-enhanced 3D galactography with tomosynthesis and the synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms generated with the latter method. Evaluation of the images created with the different imaging modalities was done by three investigators with varying levels of experience with complementary breast diagnostics (1, 5 and 15 years), and their evaluations were compared with the histological findings.
Results
All 3 investigators independently evaluated the images created with ductal sonography, contrast-enhanced 3D galactography with tomosynthesis, and generated synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms. Their evaluations were compared with the histopathological assessment of the surgical specimens resected from the 5 patients. There was 1 case of invasive breast cancer, 2 cases with ductal carcinoma in situ and 2 cases with benign findings. All 3 investigators made more mistakes when they used the standard imaging technique of ductal sonography to diagnose suspicious lesions than when they used contrast-enhanced galactography with tomosynthesis and the generated synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms.
Conclusion
This is the first time breast tomosynthesis was used in galactography (galactomosynthesis) to create digital 3-dimensional images of suspicious findings. When used together with the generated synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms, it could be a useful complementary procedure for the diagnosis of breast anomalies and could herald a renaissance of this method. Compared with high-resolution ductal ultrasound, the investigators achieved better results with contrast-enhanced galactography using tomosynthesis and the generated synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms, as confirmed by histopathological findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland
- Radiologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, CCC ER-EMN, Universitäts-Brustzentrum Franken, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Caroline Preuss
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, CCC ER-EMN, Universitäts-Brustzentrum Franken, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, CCC ER-EMN, Universitäts-Brustzentrum Franken, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Christian R Loehberg
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, CCC ER-EMN, Universitäts-Brustzentrum Franken, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael P Lux
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, CCC ER-EMN, Universitäts-Brustzentrum Franken, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Julius Emons
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, CCC ER-EMN, Universitäts-Brustzentrum Franken, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, CCC ER-EMN, Universitäts-Brustzentrum Franken, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael Uder
- Radiologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, CCC ER-EMN, Universitäts-Brustzentrum Franken, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus Mueller-Schimpfle
- Klinik für Radiologie - Klinikum Frankfurt Hoechst, DKG-zertifiziertes Brustzentrum, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Wunderle M, Olmes G, Nabieva N, Häberle L, Jud SM, Hein A, Rauh C, Hack CC, Erber R, Ekici AB, Hoyer J, Vasileiou G, Kraus C, Reis A, Hartmann A, Schulz-Wendtland R, Lux MP, Beckmann MW, Fasching PA. Risk, Prediction and Prevention of Hereditary Breast Cancer - Large-Scale Genomic Studies in Times of Big and Smart Data. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018; 78:481-492. [PMID: 29880983 PMCID: PMC5986564 DOI: 10.1055/a-0603-4350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2018] [Revised: 04/09/2018] [Accepted: 04/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Over the last two decades genetic testing for mutations in
BRCA1
and
BRCA2
has become standard of care for women and men who are at familial risk for breast or ovarian cancer. Currently, genetic testing more often also includes so-called panel genes, which are assumed to be moderate-risk genes for breast cancer. Recently, new large-scale studies provided more information about the risk estimation of those genes. The utilization of information on panel genes with regard to their association with the individual breast cancer risk might become part of future clinical practice. Furthermore, large efforts have been made to understand the influence of common genetic variants with a low impact on breast cancer risk. For this purpose, almost 450 000 individuals have been genotyped for almost 500 000 genetic variants in the OncoArray project. Based on first results it can be assumed that – together with previously identified common variants – more than 170 breast cancer risk single nucleotide polymorphisms can explain up to 18% of familial breast cancer risk. The knowledge about genetic and non-genetic risk factors and its implementation in clinical practice could especially be of use for individualized prevention. This includes an individualized risk prediction as well as the individualized selection of screening methods regarding imaging and possible lifestyle interventions. The aim of this review is to summarize the most recent developments in this area and to provide an overview on breast cancer risk genes, risk prediction models and their utilization for the individual patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marius Wunderle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Gregor Olmes
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Naiba Nabieva
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lothar Häberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.,Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sebastian M Jud
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Claudia Rauh
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carolin C Hack
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Ramona Erber
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Arif B Ekici
- Institute of Human Genetics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Juliane Hoyer
- Institute of Human Genetics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Georgia Vasileiou
- Institute of Human Genetics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Cornelia Kraus
- Institute of Human Genetics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - André Reis
- Institute of Human Genetics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland
- Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael P Lux
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Würfel F, Erber R, Huebner H, Hein A, Lux MP, Jud S, Kremer A, Kranich H, Mackensen A, Häberle L, Hack CC, Rauh C, Wunderle M, Gaß P, Rabizadeh S, Brandl AL, Langemann H, Volz B, Nabieva N, Schulz-Wendtland R, Dudziak D, Beckmann MW, Hartmann A, Fasching PA, Rübner M. TILGen: A Program to Investigate Immune Targets in Breast Cancer Patients - First Results on the Influence of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes. Breast Care (Basel) 2018; 13:8-14. [PMID: 29950961 PMCID: PMC6016056 DOI: 10.1159/000486949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite advancements in the treatment of primary and metastatic breast cancer, many patients lack a durable response to these treatments. Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER2)-positive breast cancer who do not have a pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) have a very poor prognosis. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have been identified as a predictive marker for pCR after NACT in TNBC and HER2-positive breast cancer. These patient populations could also be suitable for novel treatment strategies including neoepitope-based therapies. This work analyses the effect of TILs on the pCR in neoadjuvantly treated patients in the TILGen study and presents the procedures aimed at establishing neoepitope-based therapies in this study. METHODS Neoadjuvantly treated HER2-positive and TNBC patients were eligible for the presented analysis concerning the association between TILs and pCR. A total of 146 patients could be identified within the TILGen study. TILs were evaluated as percentage of stromal tumor tissue in core biopsies at primary diagnosis. The phenotype 'lymphocyte-predominant breast cancer' (LPBC) was associated with pCR by logistic regression adjusted for estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, HER2 status, age at diagnosis, and grading. RESULTS LPBC was seen in 24 (16.4%) patients. In this patient group, 66.7% achieved a pCR, while the pCR rate was 32.8% in patients with a low TIL count. The adjusted odds ratio was 6.60 (95% confidence interval 2.02-21.56; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION TILs are a strong predictor of pCR in TNBC and HER2-positive breast cancer patients. Implications for the use of this information including the effect on prognosis might help to identify patients most likely to benefit from a neoepitope-based therapy approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska Würfel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Ramona Erber
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Hanna Huebner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael P. Lux
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Jud
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anita Kremer
- Department of Internal Medicine 5, Haematology and Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Hannah Kranich
- Department of Internal Medicine 5, Haematology and Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Andreas Mackensen
- Department of Internal Medicine 5, Haematology and Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lothar Häberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Biostatistics Unit, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carolin C. Hack
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Claudia Rauh
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Marius Wunderle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Paul Gaß
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Anna-Lisa Brandl
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Hanna Langemann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Bernhard Volz
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Naiba Nabieva
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland
- Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Diana Dudziak
- Department of Dermatology, Laboratory of Dendritic Cell Biology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias W. Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias Rübner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Dietzel M, Kaiser CG, Wenkel E, Clauser P, Uder M, Schulz-Wendtland R, Baltzer PAT. Differentiation of ductal carcinoma in situ versus fibrocystic changes by magnetic resonance imaging: are there pathognomonic imaging features? Acta Radiol 2017; 58:1206-1214. [PMID: 28173727 DOI: 10.1177/0284185117690420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background In breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains controversial; the most challenging cause of false-positive DCIS diagnosis is fibrocystic changes (FC). Purpose To search for typical and pathognomonic patterns of DCIS and FC using a standard clinical MRI protocol. Material and Methods Consecutive patients scheduled for breast MRI (standardized protocols @ 1.5T: dynamic-T1-GRE before/after Gd-DTPA [0.1 mmol/kg body weight (BW)]; T1-TSE), with subsequent pathological sampling, were investigated. Sixteen MRI descriptors were prospectively assessed by two experienced radiologists in consensus (blinded to pathology) and explored in patients with DCIS (n = 77) or FC (n = 219). Univariate and multivariate statistics were performed to identify the accuracy of descriptors (alone, combined). Furthermore, pathognomonic descriptor-combinations with an accuracy of 100% were explored (χ2 statistics; decision trees). Results Six breast MRI descriptors significantly differentiated DCIS from FC ( Pcorrected < 0.05; odds ratio < 7.9). Pathognomonic imaging features were present in 33.8% (n = 100) of all cases allowing the identification of 42.9% of FC (n = 94). Conclusion Pathognomonic patterns of DCIS and FC were frequently observed in a standard clinical MRI protocol. Such imaging patterns could decrease the false-positive rate of breast MRI and hence might help to decrease the number of unnecessary biopsies in this clinically challenging subgroup.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Dietzel
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Clemens G Kaiser
- Institute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Evelyn Wenkel
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Paola Clauser
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Uder
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Pascal AT Baltzer
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Dietzel M, Kaiser C, Pinker K, Wenkel E, Hammon M, Uder M, Bennani Baiti B, Clauser P, Schulz-Wendtland R, Baltzer P. Automated Semi-Quantitative Analysis of Breast MRI: Potential Imaging Biomarker for the Prediction of Tissue Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Breast Care (Basel) 2017; 12:231-236. [PMID: 29070986 PMCID: PMC5649261 DOI: 10.1159/000480226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to investigate an automated semi-quantitative software as an imaging biomarker for the prediction of tissue response (TR) after completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). METHODS Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (1.5T, protocol according to international recommendations) of 67 patients with biopsy-proven invasive breast cancer were examined before and after NAC. After completion of NAC, histopathologic assessments of TR were classified according to the Chevallier grading system (CG1/4: full/non-responder; CG2/C3: partial responder). A commercially available fully automatic software (CADstream) extracted MRI parameters of tumor extension (tumor diameter/volume: TD/TV). Pre- versus post-NAC values were compared (ΔTV and ΔTD). Additionally, the software performed volumetric analyses of vascularization (VAV) after NAC. Accuracy of MRI parameters to predict TR were identified (cross-tabs, ROC, AUC, Kruskal-Wallis). RESULTS There were 37 (34.3%) CG1, 7 (6.5%) CG2, 53 (49.1%) CG3, and 11 (10.2%) CG4 lesions. The software reached area under the curve levels of 79.5% (CG1/complete response: ΔTD), 68.6% (CG2, CG3/partial response: VAV), and 88.8% to predict TR (CG4/non-response: ΔTV). CONCLUSION Semi-quantitative automated analysis of breast MRI data enabled the prediction of tissue response to NAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Dietzel
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Clemens Kaiser
- Institute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Katja Pinker
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Vienna, Austria
| | - Evelyn Wenkel
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias Hammon
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael Uder
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Barbara Bennani Baiti
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Vienna, Austria
| | - Paola Clauser
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Pascal Baltzer
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Häberle L, Hack CC, Heusinger K, Wagner F, Jud SM, Uder M, Beckmann MW, Schulz-Wendtland R, Wittenberg T, Fasching PA. Using automated texture features to determine the probability for masking of a tumor on mammography, but not ultrasound. Eur J Med Res 2017; 22:30. [PMID: 28854966 PMCID: PMC5577694 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-017-0270-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2017] [Accepted: 08/11/2017] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tumors in radiologically dense breast were overlooked on mammograms more often than tumors in low-density breasts. A fast reproducible and automated method of assessing percentage mammographic density (PMD) would be desirable to support decisions whether ultrasonography should be provided for women in addition to mammography in diagnostic mammography units. PMD assessment has still not been included in clinical routine work, as there are issues of interobserver variability and the procedure is quite time consuming. This study investigated whether fully automatically generated texture features of mammograms can replace time-consuming semi-automatic PMD assessment to predict a patient's risk of having an invasive breast tumor that is visible on ultrasound but masked on mammography (mammography failure). METHODS This observational study included 1334 women with invasive breast cancer treated at a hospital-based diagnostic mammography unit. Ultrasound was available for the entire cohort as part of routine diagnosis. Computer-based threshold PMD assessments ("observed PMD") were carried out and 363 texture features were obtained from each mammogram. Several variable selection and regression techniques (univariate selection, lasso, boosting, random forest) were applied to predict PMD from the texture features. The predicted PMD values were each used as new predictor for masking in logistic regression models together with clinical predictors. These four logistic regression models with predicted PMD were compared among themselves and with a logistic regression model with observed PMD. The most accurate masking prediction was determined by cross-validation. RESULTS About 120 of the 363 texture features were selected for predicting PMD. Density predictions with boosting were the best substitute for observed PMD to predict masking. Overall, the corresponding logistic regression model performed better (cross-validated AUC, 0.747) than one without mammographic density (0.734), but less well than the one with the observed PMD (0.753). However, in patients with an assigned mammography failure risk >10%, covering about half of all masked tumors, the boosting-based model performed at least as accurately as the original PMD model. CONCLUSION Automatically generated texture features can replace semi-automatically determined PMD in a prediction model for mammography failure, such that more than 50% of masked tumors could be discovered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lothar Häberle
- University Breast Center for Franconia, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany. .,Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Carolin C Hack
- University Breast Center for Franconia, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Katharina Heusinger
- University Breast Center for Franconia, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Florian Wagner
- Fraunhofer Institute for Integrated Circuits IIS, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sebastian M Jud
- University Breast Center for Franconia, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael Uder
- University Breast Center for Franconia, Institute of Radiology, Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- University Breast Center for Franconia, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland
- University Breast Center for Franconia, Institute of Radiology, Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Peter A Fasching
- University Breast Center for Franconia, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany.,Division Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Formago M, Schrauder MG, Rauh C, Hack CC, Jud SM, Hildebrandt T, Schulz-Wendtland R, Frentz S, Graubert S, Beckmann MW, Lux MP. Should Breast Cancer Surgery Be Done in an Outpatient Setting?: Health Economics From the Perspective of Service Providers. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2017; 77:879-886. [PMID: 28845052 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-114427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2017] [Revised: 06/19/2017] [Accepted: 06/20/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The care of patients with breast cancer is extremely complex and requires interdisciplinary care in certified facilities. These specialized facilities provide numerous services without being correspondingly remunerated. The question whether breast cancer surgery should be performed in an outpatient setting to reduce costs is increasingly being debated. This study compares inpatient surgical treatment with a model of the same surgery performed on an outpatient basis to examine the potential financial impact. MATERIAL AND METHODS A theoretical model was developed and the DRG fees for surgical interventions to treat primary breast cancer were calculated. A theoretical 1-day DRG was then calculated to permit comparisons with outpatient procedures. The costs of outpatient surgery were calculated based on the remuneration rates of the AOP (Outpatient Surgery) Contract and the EBM (Uniform Assessment Scale) and compared to the costs of the 1-day DRG. RESULTS The DRG fee for both breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy is higher than the fee paid in the context of the EBM system, although the same procedures were carried out in both systems. If a hospital were to carry out breast-conserving surgery as an outpatient procedure, the fee would be € 1313.81; depending on the type of surgery, the hospital would therefore only receive between 39.20% and 52.82% of the DRG fee. This was the case even for a 1-day treatment. Compared to the real DRG fees the difference would be even more striking. CONCLUSION Carrying out breast cancer surgery as an outpatient procedure would result in a significant shortfall of revenues. Additional services from certified centers, such as the interdisciplinary planning of treatment, psycho-oncological and social-medical care with the involvement of relatives, detailed documentation, etc., which are currently provided without surcharge or adequate remuneration, could no longer be maintained. The quality of processes and excellent results which have been achieved and ultimately the care given by certified facilities would be significantly at risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret Formago
- Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael G Schrauder
- Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Claudia Rauh
- Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carolin C Hack
- Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sebastian M Jud
- Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Thomas Hildebrandt
- Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland
- Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Department of Radiology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | - S Frentz
- Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Commercial Directorate, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | - S Graubert
- Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Commercial Directorate, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael P Lux
- Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Hack CC, Emons J, Jud SM, Heusinger K, Adler W, Gass P, Haeberle L, Heindl F, Hein A, Schulz-Wendtland R, Uder M, Hartmann A, Beckmann MW, Fasching PA, Pöhls UG. Association between mammographic density and pregnancies relative to age and BMI: a breast cancer case-only analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 166:701-708. [PMID: 28828694 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4446-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2017] [Accepted: 08/05/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Percentage mammographic density (PMD) is a major risk factor for breast cancer (BC). It is strongly associated with body mass index (BMI) and age, which are themselves risk factors for breast cancer. This analysis investigated the association between the number of full-term pregnancies and PMD in different subgroups relative to age and BMI. METHODS Patients were identified in the breast cancer database of the University Breast Center for Franconia. A total of 2410 patients were identified, for whom information on parity, age, and BMI, and a mammogram from the time of first diagnosis were available for assessing PMD. Linear regression analyses were conducted to investigate the influence on PMD of the number of full-term pregnancies (FTPs), age, BMI, and interaction terms between them. RESULTS As in previous studies, age, number of FTPs, and BMI were found to be associated with PMD in the expected direction. However, including the respective interaction terms improved the prediction of PMD even further. Specifically, the association between PMD and the number of FTPs differed in young patients under the age of 45 (mean decrease of 0.37 PMD units per pregnancy) from the association in older age groups (mean decrease between 2.29 and 2.39 PMD units). BMI did not alter the association between PMD and the number of FTPs. CONCLUSIONS The effect of pregnancies on mammographic density does not appear to become apparent before the age of menopause. The mechanism that drives the effect of pregnancies on mammographic density appears to be counter-regulated by other influences on mammographic density in younger patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolin C Hack
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen/European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Julius Emons
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen/European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sebastian M Jud
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen/European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Katharina Heusinger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen/European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Werner Adler
- Institute of Biometry and Epidemiology, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Paul Gass
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen/European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lothar Haeberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen/European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Felix Heindl
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen/European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen/European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Michael Uder
- Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen/European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen/European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen/European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Uwe G Pöhls
- Practice of Dr. Pöhls, Women's Health Center of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Häberle L, Hein A, Rübner M, Schneider M, Ekici AB, Gass P, Hartmann A, Schulz-Wendtland R, Beckmann MW, Lo WY, Schroth W, Brauch H, Fasching PA, Wunderle M. Predicting Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Subtype Using Multiple Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms for Breast Cancer Risk and Several Variable Selection Methods. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2017; 77:667-678. [PMID: 28757654 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-111602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2017] [Revised: 05/15/2017] [Accepted: 05/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Studies of triple-negative breast cancer have recently been extending the inclusion criteria and incorporating additional molecular markers into the selection criteria, opening up scope for targeted therapies. The screening phases required for studies of this type are often prolonged, since the process of determining the molecular subtype and carrying out additional biomarker assessment is time-consuming. Parameters such as germline genotypes capable of predicting the molecular subtype before it becomes available from pathology might be helpful for treatment planning and optimizing the timing and cost of screening phases. This appears to be feasible, as rapid and low-cost genotyping methods are becoming increasingly available. The aim of this study was to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for breast cancer risk capable of predicting triple negativity, in addition to clinical predictors, in breast cancer patients. METHODS This cross-sectional observational study included 1271 women with invasive breast cancer who were treated at a university hospital. A total of 76 validated breast cancer risk SNPs were successfully genotyped. Univariate associations between each SNP and triple negativity were explored using logistic regression analyses. Several variable selection and regression techniques were applied to identify a set of SNPs that together improve the prediction of triple negativity in addition to the clinical predictors of age at diagnosis and body mass index (BMI). The most accurate prediction method was determined by cross-validation. RESULTS The SNP rs10069690 (TERT, CLPTM1L) was the only significant SNP (corrected p = 0.02) after correction of p values for multiple testing in the univariate analyses. This SNP and three additional SNPs from the genes RAD51B, CCND1, and FGFR2 were selected for prediction of triple negativity. The addition of these SNPs to clinical predictors increased the cross-validated area under the curve (AUC) from 0.618 to 0.625. Age at diagnosis was the strongest predictor, stronger than any genetic characteristics. CONCLUSION Prediction of triple-negative breast cancer can be improved if SNPs associated with breast cancer risk are added to a prediction rule based on age at diagnosis and BMI. This finding could be used for prescreening purposes in complex molecular therapy studies for triple-negative breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lothar Häberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.,Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias Rübner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael Schneider
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Arif B Ekici
- Institute of Human Genetics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Paul Gass
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland
- Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Wing-Yee Lo
- Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany.,University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Werner Schroth
- Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany.,University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Hiltrud Brauch
- Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany.,University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Marius Wunderle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Hack CC, Stoll MJ, Jud SM, Heusinger K, Adler W, Haeberle L, Ganslandt T, Heindl F, Schulz-Wendtland R, Cavallaro A, Uder M, Beckmann MW, Fasching PA, Bayer CM. Correlation of mammographic density and serum calcium levels in patients with primary breast cancer. Cancer Med 2017; 6:1473-1481. [PMID: 28464481 PMCID: PMC5463083 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2016] [Revised: 03/04/2017] [Accepted: 03/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Percentage mammographic breast density (PMD) is one of the most important risk factors for breast cancer (BC). Calcium, vitamin D, bisphosphonates, and denosumab have been considered and partly confirmed as factors potentially influencing the risk of BC. This retrospective observational study investigated the association between serum calcium level and PMD. A total of 982 BC patients identified in the research database at the University Breast Center for Franconia with unilateral BC, calcium and albumin values, and mammogram at the time of first diagnosis were included. PMD was assessed, using a semiautomated method by two readers. Linear regression analyses were conducted to investigate the impact on PMD of the parameters of serum calcium level adjusted for albumin level, and well‐known clinical predictors such as age, body mass index (BMI), menopausal status and confounder for serum calcium like season in which the BC was diagnosed. Increased calcium levels were associated with reduced PMD (P = 0.024). Furthermore, PMD was inversely associated with BMI (P < 0.001) and age (P < 0.001). There was also an association between PMD and menopausal status (P < 0.001). The goodness‐of‐fit of the regression model was moderate. This is the first study assessing the association between serum calcium level and PMD. An inverse association with adjusted serum calcium levels was observed. These findings add to previously published data relating to vitamin D, bisphosphonates, denosumab, and the RANK/RANKL signaling pathway in breast cancer risk and prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolin C Hack
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen/European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Martin J Stoll
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen/European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sebastian M Jud
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen/European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Katharina Heusinger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen/European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Werner Adler
- Institute of Biometry and Epidemiology, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lothar Haeberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen/European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Thomas Ganslandt
- Medical Center for Information and Communication Technology, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Felix Heindl
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen/European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Alexander Cavallaro
- Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael Uder
- Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen/European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen/European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany.,Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Christian M Bayer
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen/European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Schulz-Wendtland R, Jud SM, Fasching PA, Hartmann A, Radicke M, Rauh C, Uder M, Wunderle M, Gass P, Langemann H, Beckmann MW, Emons J. A Standard Mammography Unit - Standard 3D Ultrasound Probe Fusion Prototype: First Results. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2017; 77:679-685. [PMID: 28713173 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-107034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2017] [Revised: 03/26/2017] [Accepted: 03/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM The combination of different imaging modalities through the use of fusion devices promises significant diagnostic improvement for breast pathology. The aim of this study was to evaluate image quality and clinical feasibility of a prototype fusion device (fusion prototype) constructed from a standard tomosynthesis mammography unit and a standard 3D ultrasound probe using a new method of breast compression. MATERIALS AND METHODS Imaging was performed on 5 mastectomy specimens from patients with confirmed DCIS or invasive carcinoma (BI-RADS ™ 6). For the preclinical fusion prototype an ABVS system ultrasound probe from an Acuson S2000 was integrated into a MAMMOMAT Inspiration (both Siemens Healthcare Ltd) and, with the aid of a newly developed compression plate, digital mammogram and automated 3D ultrasound images were obtained. RESULTS The quality of digital mammogram images produced by the fusion prototype was comparable to those produced using conventional compression. The newly developed compression plate did not influence the applied x-ray dose. The method was not more labour intensive or time-consuming than conventional mammography. From the technical perspective, fusion of the two modalities was achievable. CONCLUSION In this study, using only a few mastectomy specimens, the fusion of an automated 3D ultrasound machine with a standard mammography unit delivered images of comparable quality to conventional mammography. The device allows simultaneous ultrasound - the second important imaging modality in complementary breast diagnostics - without increasing examination time or requiring additional staff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sebastian M Jud
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Claudia Rauh
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael Uder
- Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Marius Wunderle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Paul Gass
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Hanna Langemann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Julius Emons
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Schrauder MG, Brunel-Geuder L, Häberle L, Wunderle M, Hoyer J, Reis A, Schulz-Wendtland R, Beckmann MW, Lux MP. Cost-effectiveness of risk-reducing surgeries in preventing hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Breast 2017; 32:186-191. [DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2017] [Revised: 02/09/2017] [Accepted: 02/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|
46
|
Schulz-Wendtland R, Uder M, Müller-Schimpfle M. Galaktografie mit Tomosythese – Renaissance einer Methode? ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG 2017. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1600341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - M Uder
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Radiologisches Institut, Erlangen
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Hahn M, Bamberg M, Wallwiener D, Brucker S, Schulz-Wendtland R. In memoriam Prof. Dr. med. Dr. h. c. mult. Umberto Veronesi. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2017. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-101426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
|
48
|
Rößler AC, Kalender W, Kolditz D, Steiding C, Ruth V, Preuss C, Peter SC, Brehm B, Hammon M, Schulz-Wendtland R, Wenkel E. Performance of Photon-Counting Breast Computed Tomography, Digital Mammography, and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Evaluating Breast Specimens. Acad Radiol 2017; 24:184-190. [PMID: 27888024 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2016] [Revised: 09/21/2016] [Accepted: 09/25/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES This study compared a novel photon-counting breast computed tomography (pcBCT) system with digital mammography (DM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) systems. For this reason, surgical specimens were examined with all three techniques and rated by three observers. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 30 surgical specimens were investigated with DM, DBT, and pcBCT; the associated images were shown to three experienced radiologists. Findings (22 microcalcifications and 23 mass lesions) were recorded and compared to the results of the pathological examination. Sensitivity and specificity for detection of microcalcifications and lesions were calculated and displayed using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS Sensitivity for microcalcifications was 82% for DM, 70% for DBT, and 85% for pcBCT. Specificity for microcalcifications was 71% for DM, 75% for DBT, and 83% for pcBCT. Sensitivity for lesions was 45% for DM, 62% for DBT, and 65% for pcBCT. Specificity for lesions was 76% for DM, 62% for DBT, and 76% for pcBCT. CONCLUSIONS pcBCT showed a comparable or superior performance compared to the clinically approved DM and DBT systems. Mass lesion detectability can be increased further by the use of contrast media.
Collapse
|
49
|
Schulz-Wendtland R, Harz M, Meier-Meitinger M, Brehm B, Wacker T, Hahn HK, Wagner F, Wittenberg T, Beckmann MW, Uder M, Fasching PA, Emons J. Semi-automated delineation of breast cancer tumors and subsequent materialization using three-dimensional printing (rapid prototyping). J Surg Oncol 2016; 115:238-242. [DOI: 10.1002/jso.24510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2016] [Accepted: 10/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Markus Harz
- Fraunhofer-Institut für Bildgestützte Medizin MEVIS; Bremen Germany
| | | | - Barbara Brehm
- Institute of Diagnostic Radiology; Erlangen University Hospital; Erlangen Germany
| | - Till Wacker
- Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg; Erlangen Germany
| | - Horst K. Hahn
- Fraunhofer-Institut für Bildgestützte Medizin MEVIS; Bremen Germany
| | - Florian Wagner
- Fraunhofer-Institut für Integrierte Schaltungen IIS; Erlangen Germany
| | - Thomas Wittenberg
- Fraunhofer-Institut für Integrierte Schaltungen IIS; Erlangen Germany
| | - Matthias W. Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics; Erlangen University Hospital; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN; Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg; Erlangen Germany
| | - Michael Uder
- Institute of Diagnostic Radiology; Erlangen University Hospital; Erlangen Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics; Erlangen University Hospital; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN; Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg; Erlangen Germany
| | - Julius Emons
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics; Erlangen University Hospital; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN; Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg; Erlangen Germany
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Gaß P, Bani M, Bayer CM, Beckmann MW, Erber R, Hartmann A, Häberle L, Hein A, Heusinger K, Lux MP, Rauh C, Schulz-Wendtland R, Schrauder MG, Wachter DL, Fasching PA. Prädiktion der kompletten pathologischen Remission nach neoadjuvanter Chemotherapie durch Ki-67, den Östrogen- und Progesteronrezeptor. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2016. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1592826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|