Paliperidone Long-Acting Plasma Level Monitoring and a New Method of Evaluation of Clinical Stability

Optimisation of pharmacotherapy in psychiatry through therapeutic drug monitoring, molecular brain imaging and pharmacogenetic tests: Focus on antipsychotics

BACKGROUND

For psychotic disorders (i.e. schizophrenia), pharmacotherapy plays a key role in controlling acute and long-term symptoms. To find the optimal individual dose and dosage strategy, specialised tools are used. Three tools have been proven useful to personalise drug treatments: therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of drug levels, pharmacogenetic testing (PG), and molecular neuroimaging.

METHODS

In these Guidelines, we provide an in-depth review of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics for 45 antipsychotics. Over 30 international experts in psychiatry selected studies that have measured drug concentrations in the blood (TDM), gene polymorphisms of enzymes involved in drug metabolism, or receptor/transporter occupancies in the brain (positron emission tomography (PET)).

RESULTS

Study results strongly support the use of TDM and the cytochrome P450 (CYP) genotyping and/or phenotyping to guide drug therapies. Evidence-based target ranges are available for titrating drug doses that are often supported by PET findings.

CONCLUSION

All three tools discussed in these Guidelines are essential for drug treatment. TDM goes well beyond typical indications such as unclear compliance and polypharmacy. Despite its enormous potential to optimise treatment effects, minimise side effects and ultimately reduce the global burden of diseases, personalised drug treatment has not yet become the standard of care in psychiatry.

Evidence for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Atypical Antipsychotics

Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs), also known as atypical antipsychotics, are a newer class of antipsychotic drugs used to treat schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and related psychiatric conditions. The plasma concentration of antipsychotic drugs is a valid measure of the drug at its primary target structure in the brain, and therefore determines the efficacy and safety of these drugs. However, despite the well-known high variability in pharmacokinetics of these substances, psychiatric medication is usually administered in uniform dosage schedules. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), as the specific method that can help personalised medicine in dose adjustment according to the characteristics of the individual patient, minimizing the risk of toxicity, monitoring adherence, and increasing cost-effectiveness in the treatment, thus seems to be an elegant tool to solve this problem. Non-response to therapeutic doses, uncertain adherence to medication, suboptimal tolerability, or pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions are typical indications for TDM of SGAs. This review aims to summarize an overview of the current knowledge and evidence of the possibilities to tailor the dosage of selected SGAs using TDM, including the necessary pharmacokinetic parameters for personalised pharmacotherapy.

Barriers to the use of three-month Paliperidone Palmitate formulation: a study from an Italian real-world setting

BACKGROUND

Long-acting injectable paliperidone can improve adherence in psychotic patients and reduce relapses and healthcare resource utilization (HRU). This study compares the effectiveness of the three-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP3M) with the one-monthly formulation (PP1M) and investigates reasons that hinder the use of PP3M in real-world settings.

METHODS

The authors conducted a three-phase observational study. For subjects recruited from six psychiatric services in Milan, HRU outcomes of PP3M prescription were evaluated through a 12-month mirror-image design (phase 1) and a comparison of HRU of PP1M-only subjects and PP3M subjects during the year prior to PP3M initiation (phase 2). Lastly, they conducted a survey among physicians concerning reasons for not switching to PP3M (phase 3).

RESULTS

A total of 119 subjects (61 on PP3M and 58 on PP1M) were included. One year after PP3M initiation, outpatients' visits decreased significantly. Comparing PP3M with PP1M subjects, no significant difference was found in HRU. Perception of patient's unstable clinical condition was the main reason for maintaining PP1M (32.8%), followed by the need for monthly monitoring (19.7%).

CONCLUSION

PP3M initiation was associated with an overall HRU reduction. Subjects switched to PP3M had similar HRU when compared to those who did not, suggesting similar clinical conditions in both groups.

The Switch From Paliperidone Long-Acting Injectable 1- to 3-Monthly: Clinical Pharmacokinetic Evaluation in Patients With Schizophrenia (Preliminary Data)

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was a preliminary evaluation of the maintenance of clinical efficacy and tolerability of paliperidone palmitate in patients with schizophrenia during the transition phase from 1-monthly paliperidone palmitate formulation (PP1M) to PP3M, with the evaluation of plasma levels of the drug.

METHODS/PROCEDURES

A prospective observational study was conducted for 13 months involving 22 outpatients, aged 18 to 66 years and clinically stabilized. Patients were affected by schizophrenia according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, criteria. For each patient, clinical assessment, safety and tolerability, and drug plasma level determination were performed. Clinical efficacy was assessed by Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Positive and Negative Symptom Scale, and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. During the first 4 months of the study, once-monthly paliperidone palmitate was administered, and then during the following 9 months, the 3-monthly formulation was administered.

FINDINGS/RESULTS

The time course of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale total scores showed a statistically significant (P = 0.006) improvement from T0 to T8; Positive and Negative Symptom Scale scores showed a similar time course, with a statistically significant (P = 0.0016) reduction of the mean total score; Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression mean scores showed a statistically significant (P = 0.003) reduction with substantial maintenance of clinical stabilization of the patients. Only 1 patient dropped out after the first PP3M injection.

IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary data currently confirm the maintenance of clinical stability shifting from PP1M to PP3M.

Clinical response in patients treated with once-monthly paliperidone palmitate: analysis of a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) database

To investigate pharmacokinetic correlates of clinical response in patients treated with once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) injections at steady state. Plasma concentrations and dose-adjusted-plasma concentrations (C/D) of paliperidone from a naturalistic therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) database were compared between responders and non-responders using the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale (CGI-I) ratings. Analyses were based on the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test and the Pearson Chi-squared test (χ²) with a significance level of 0.05. Subgroup analyses were performed separately in patients with schizophrenia spectrum, schizoaffective disorders and bipolar disorders. Comparing 93 responders with 80 non-responders, we detected no significant differences in the proportion of females, age, and body mass index (p's ranging 0.18-0.83); there were more smokers in the group of non-responders (p = 0.04), which also included more patients with bipolar disorders (p = 0.014). Despite the lack of differences for prescribed PP1M doses and dose intervals (p = 0.42 and p = 0.11, respectively), non-responders had higher paliperidone plasma concentrations and C/D levels (p = 0.033 and p = 0.021, respectively). Subgroup analyses did not yield differences for paliperidone plasma and C/D levels between non-responders and responders with schizophrenia spectrum (p = 0.099 and p = 0.14, respectively) and bipolar disorders (p = 0.95 and p = 0.75, respectively); dose-adjusted plasma concentrations were higher in non-responders compared to responders with schizoaffective disorders (p = 0.039), while no differences were reported for plasma levels (p = 0. 15). Our results show that paliperidone plasma concentrations over injection doses may be associated with patterns of clinical response suggesting potential utility of TDM as part of PP1M-based maintenance treatment.

Pharmacokinetic Correlates of Once-Monthly Paliperidone Palmitate-Related Adverse Drug Reactions

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate associations between pharmacokinetic correlates and once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M)-related adverse drug reactions (ADRs).

METHODS

Plasma concentrations and dose-adjusted plasma concentrations ('concentration-by-dose' [C/D]) of paliperidone from a naturalistic therapeutic drug monitoring database of PP1M-treated patients were compared between patients with ADRs, classified according to the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser side-effect rating scales categories, and patients without ADRs. Analyses included non-parametric tests and a logistic regression model with a significance level set at 0.05.

RESULTS

In 172 patients, we found no differences in sex, age, smoking, body mass index, PP1M dose, paliperidone plasma concentrations, and C/D values (p > 0.05) between 44 patients with and 128 patients without PP1M-related ADRs. We did not detect differences when specifying for different types of ADRs (p > 0.05). Injection intervals were shorter in patients with vs patients without ADRs (p = 0.03). The logistic regression did not report effects for sex, plasma concentrations, or C/D values (p > 0.05). Post hoc analyses in male patients receiving PP1M every 28 weeks reported higher paliperidone concentrations and C/D values in patients with vs without ADRs (p = 0.049 and p = 0.022). Within the group of male patients, we found an odds ratio of 3.07 for PP1M-associated ADRs in patients with C/D values above 7.7 (ng/mL)/(mg/day).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings did not reveal distinct patterns of paliperidone concentrations in patients with PP1M-related ADRs. However, male patients receiving PP1M every 28 days with C/D values higher than 7.7 (ng/mL)/(mg/day) showed a higher risk for ADRs, implying that therapeutic drug monitoring may be useful in assessing the risk of PP1M-related ADRs.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotic Drugs

BACKGROUND

The use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to guide treatment with long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics, which are increasingly prescribed, remains a matter of debate. The aim of this review was to provide a practical framework for the integration of TDM when switching from an oral formulation to the LAI counterpart, and in maintenance treatment.

METHODS

The authors critically reviewed 3 types of data: (1) positron emission tomography data evaluating dopamine (D2/D3) receptor occupancy related to antipsychotic concentrations in serum or plasma; D2/D3 receptors are embraced as target sites in the brain for antipsychotic efficacy and tolerability, (2) pharmacokinetic studies evaluating the switch from oral to LAI antipsychotics, and (3) pharmacokinetic data for LAI formulations. Based on these data, indications for TDM and therapeutic reference ranges were considered for LAI antipsychotics.

RESULTS

Antipsychotic concentrations in blood exhibited interindividual variability not only under oral but also under LAI formulations because these concentrations are affected by demographic characteristics such as age and sex, genetic peculiarities, and clinical variables, including comedications and comorbidities. Reported data combined with positron emission tomography evidence indicated a trend toward lower concentrations under LAI administration than under oral medications. However, the available evidence is insufficient to recommend LAI-specific therapeutic reference ranges.

CONCLUSIONS

Although TDM evidence for newer LAI formulations is limited, this review suggests the use of TDM when switching an antipsychotic from oral to its LAI formulation. The application of TDM practice is more accurate for dose selection than the use of dose equivalents as it accounts more precisely for individual characteristics.

Paliperidone LAI and Aripiprazole LAI Plasma Level Monitoring in the Prophylaxis of Bipolar Disorder Type I with Manic Predominance

Introduction The objective of this study was the evaluation of utility of plasma level monitoring in the clinical stabilizing efficacy and tolerability of paliperidone palmitate (PP) vs. aripiprazole monohydrate (AM) in bipolar disorder I (BD I) with manic predominance.

Methods Fifty-six outpatients of both sexes, age ranging from 18 to 65 years, affected by BD I with manic predominance, orally treated and stabilized after acute episode for at least 2 weeks with paliperidone or aripiprazole (n=31, paliperidone; n=25, aripiprazole) underwent a prospective observational study of switching to the corresponding long-acting injection (LAI) on the basis of clinical evaluation. The efficacy and tolerability of the 2 treatments were assessed by BPRS, PANSS, HAMD21, and MRS rating scales and a check list every month for 12 months. Drug plasma levels determinations (PLs) were performed at the same times.

Results A good clinical stability and tolerability of both drugs were reported. Lower mean PLs of PP showed a positive effect on depressive symptoms. AM PLs variability was associated with greater instability of manic symptoms whereas intermediate PLs seem to have more influence on depressive symptomatology.

Discussion PLs drug monitoring has been proven to be useful, and further investigations to identify optimal therapeutic ranges for LAI formulations are needed.