Comparing Plastic Surgery and Otolaryngology Management in Cleft Care: An Analysis of 4,999 Cases

Distribution of Specialties Providing Surgical Management of Cleft-Related Speech Disorders in Children 3 years of Age and Older: 2004 to 2021

Given the overlap in specialties performing secondary correction of velopharyngeal incompetence (VPI), the present study investigated the specialty distribution for surgical providers of cleft care from 2004 to 2021. Data were obtained from 45 hospitals from 2004 to 2021 through the Pediatric Health Information System database. Cases of secondary surgical management of VPI were retrieved, identifying the year of surgery and specialty of the providing surgeon. A total of 7090 procedures were included in this study, of which 36.0% were secondary palatoplasty/lengthening, 34.1% were sphincter pharyngoplasty, and 29.8% were pharyngeal flap. Secondary management of VPI was performed by plastic surgeons (67%), otolaryngologists (31%), and oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMFS, 12%). Palatal revision and/or lengthening procedures were the most common secondary procedure performed by plastic surgeons (42%) and OMFS (64%), whereas sphincter pharyngoplasty was the most common procedure performed by otolaryngologists (55%; P <0.001). The proportion of sphincter pharyngoplasty performed by plastic surgeons significantly decreased from 2017-2021 ( P <0.05). Plastic surgeons performed most procedures for secondary management of VPI from 2004 to 2021, followed by otolaryngologists and OMFS. The type of procedure selected for secondary management of VPI differed significantly between the provider's specialty, with otolaryngologists more likely to perform sphincter pharyngoplasty.

Pediatric Orthognathic Surgery: A NSQIP-P Comparison of Peri-Operative Factors and Outcome Differences Between Cleft and Noncleft Patients

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to investigate the risk factors, complication profiles, and clinical outcomes of cleft and noncleft patients undergoing single jaw (mandibular or LeFort 1) and bimaxillary (BSSO + LeFort 1).

DESIGN

Retrospective Cross-sectional Study Setting: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database 2018-2019.

PATIENTS

Pediatric patients.

INTERVENTIONS

Outcomes for mandibular, LeFort 1, and bimaxillary osteotomy were retrospectively evaluated for cleft and noncleft patients.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the odds of complications and length of stay for cleft and noncleft patients undergoing single jaw and double jaw surgery.

RESULTS

669 pediatric patient underwent orthognathic surgery in the study period; the majority received LF1 only (n = 385; 58.3%), followed by mandible only (n = 179; 27.1%), and bimaxillary (n = 105; 15.9%%). Cleft differences were present in 56% of LFI patients, 32% of mandibular patients, and 22% of bimaxillary patients. After multivariate adjustment, ASA class III was associated with nearly 400% increased odds of any complication including readmission and reoperation (OR = 5.99; CI [[1.54-23.32]], p < 0.01, and 65% increased LOS (β-coefficient = 1.65, CI [1.37-1.99], p < 0.01). Presence of cleft was not significantly associated with odds of any complication (p = 0.69) nor increased LOS (p = 0.46) in this population.

CONCLUSION

Complications remained low between surgery types among cleft and noncleft patients. The most significant risk factor in pediatric orthognathic surgery was not the presence of cleft but rather increased ASA class. Though common in patients seeking orthognathic surgery, cleft differences did not cause additional risk after adjustment for other variables.

Practice Patterns and Outcomes of Skin Cancer Reconstruction of the Head, Neck, and Face by Surgical Specialty: An NSQIP Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Reconstructive procedures of the head, neck, and face after skin cancer resection are typically performed by surgeons trained in either ENT facial plastic surgery or plastic and reconstructive surgery. We analyzed a large national database to compare patient populations, practice, and outcomes of skin cancer reconstruction of the head, neck, and face performed by these 2 surgical specialties.

METHODS

Cases were selected from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Variables that differed significantly on univariate analysis were included in a nominal logistic regression, with having at least 1 wound-specific complication, medical complication, or unplanned reoperation within 30 days as the dependent variables.

RESULTS

There were a total of 2850 cases, of which 61.36% were performed by ENT. Surgical specialty was not found to be a predictor of wound complications, medical complications, or unplanned reoperations. On multivariate analysis, operative times greater than 6 hours and anatomical location (specifically, skin cancer of the nose) predicted adverse outcomes. Significant differences were observed between the patient populations of the 2 specialties in terms of demographics, comorbidities, and the anatomical location of the cancer defect.

CONCLUSION

Reconstruction of the head, neck, and face after skin cancer removal represents an important and common element in the scope of practice of both ENT facial plastic surgeons and plastic surgeons. No evidence was found to suggest that surgical specialty is associated with adverse postoperative outcomes. However, ENT facial plastic surgeons and plastic surgeons seem to manage unique patient populations and use different reconstructive techniques, reflecting their distinct training and areas of expertise. A multidisciplinary approach where the complementary skills of both specialties can be leveraged may optimize patient outcomes.

National Trends of Otolaryngology Involvement in Cleft Surgical Management over 10-Years

OBJECTIVE

Surgical management of cleft lip/palate and cleft rhinoplasty have historically been performed by plastic surgeons. No study has addressed temporal trends in cleft-associated surgeries. This study assesses trends in cleft surgical management and complications in a national database.

METHODS

Cross-sectional analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric database from 2012 to 2021. Patients receiving cleft lip and/or palate repair were isolated using CPT codes. A subset receiving cleft rhinoplasty was also analyzed. The yearly proportion of otolaryngologists compared to general plastic surgeons performing surgeries was noted. Regression analysis was used to identify trends and predictors of management by OHNS.

RESULTS

We identified 46,618 cases of cleft repair, of which 15.6% (N = 7,255) underwent repair with otolaryngology. On univariate Pearson correlation analysis, neither cleft rhinoplasties performed by OHNS over time (R = 0.371, 95% CI -0.337 to 0.811, p = 0.2907) nor all cases (R = -0.26, -0.76 to 0.44, p = 0.465) exhibited a significant change. On multivariable regression, the operative year was not associated with being treated by otolaryngology (p = 0.826) for all cleft cases but was associated with such in cleft rhinoplasties (OR 1.04, 1.01-1.08, p = 0.024). On multivariable analysis, the operative year was correlated with a higher rate of complications overall (OR 1.04, 1.01-1.07, p = 0.002). Surgeon specialty was not associated with complication rates.

CONCLUSIONS

In the last 10 years, no change in the proportion of cleft lip/palate repair performed by OHNS was observed. Otolaryngologists are performing more cleft rhinoplasty but at a marginal rate. Otolaryngologists also manage more complex patients with multiple comorbidities compared to their colleagues. Complication rates have increased overall regardless of surgeon specialty, warranting further investigation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 134:671-677, 2024.

Unplanned Intensive Care Unit Admission Following Cleft Palate Repair by Head and Neck Surgeons

OBJECTIVE

To examine the incidence of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission following primary repair of cleft palate by otolaryngologist-head and neck surgeons at 2 tertiary centers. To identify potential diagnoses associated with admission or unanticipated PICU transfer.

STUDY DESIGN

Multi-institutional case series with chart review.

SETTING

Two tertiary pediatric medical centers.

METHODS

Children who underwent primary repair of cleft palate at 2 cleft centers over a 10-year period were identified. Charts were reviewed for demographics, comorbidities, and whether PICU admission was required.

RESULTS

From 2009 to 2019, 464 patients underwent primary repair of a cleft palate by 1 of 6 otolaryngologist-head and neck surgeons with subspecialty training in cleft surgery; 459 patients had sufficient postoperative documentation and 443 children met inclusion criteria. The incidence of PICU admission was 9.3% (41/443), with 33 (7.4%) planned admissions and 8 (1.8%) unexpected PICU transfers. Syndromic conditions were associated with both planned and unanticipated PICU admissions.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of unanticipated postoperative PICU admission following cleft palate repair by otolaryngologist-head and neck surgeons was low. Risk stratification by surgeons with expertise in airway management may inform decisions regarding postoperative disposition of patients with medical or airway complexity who are undergoing cleft palate repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Comparing plastic surgery and otolaryngology surgical outcomes and cartilage graft preferences in pediatric rhinoplasty: A retrospective cohort study analyzing 1839 patients

ABSTRACT

Rhinoplasty in children has raised concerns about its safety in the pediatric population. There is scarcity of evidence describing outcomes and surgical techniques performed in pediatric rhinoplasty. We analyzed post-operative complications and cartilage preferences between plastic surgeons and otolaryngologists.Data was collected through the Pediatric National Surgical Improvement Program from 2012 to 2017. Current Procedure Terminology codes were used for data extraction. Patients were grouped according to type of rhinoplasty procedures (primary, secondary, and cleft rhinoplasty). A comparison between plastic surgeons and otolaryngologists was made in each group in terms of postoperative complications. Additionally, a sub-group analysis based on cartilage graft preferences was performed.During the study period, a total of 1839 patients underwent rhinoplasty procedures; plastic surgeons performed 1438 (78.2%) cases and otolaryngologists performed 401 (21.8%) cases. After analyzing each group, no significant differences were noted in terms of wound dehiscence, surgical site infection, readmission, or reoperation. Subgroup analysis revealed that plastic surgeons prefer using rib and ear cartilage, while otolaryngologists prefer septal and ear cartilage.The analysis of 1839 pediatric patients undergoing three types of rhinoplasty procedures showed similar postoperative outcomes, but different cartilage graft utilization between plastic surgeons and otolaryngologists.

Incidence of Fistula Formation and Velopharyngeal Insufficiency in Early Versus Standard Cleft Palate Repair

The goals of cleft palate repair are well-established; however, there does exist difference in practice patterns regarding the most appropriate patient age for palatoplasty. The optimal timing is debated and influenced by cleft type, surgical technique, and the surgeon's training. The objective of this study was to compare the rates of post-operative fistula formation and velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) in "early" versus "standard" cleft palate repair in a cohort of patients treated at a single craniofacial center.A retrospective chart review identified 525 patients treated for cleft palate from 2000 to 2017 with 216 meeting inclusion criteria. "Early repair" is defined as palatoplasty before 6-months of age (108 patients). "Standard repair" is palatoplasty at or beyond 6-months old (108 patients). Rates of fistula formation were found to be significantly higher in early repairs (Chi-square statistic 9.0536, P value = 0.0026). Development of VPI was not significantly different between the 2 groups (Chi-square statistic 1.2068, P value = 0.27196). As expected, the incidence of post-palatoplasty VPI was significantly higher in patients who had a post-operative fistula when compared to those who healed without fistula formation (Chi-square statistic 4.3627, P value = 0.0367).There is significant debate regarding the optimal timing of cleft repair to maximize speech outcomes and minimize risks. The authors' data show that post-operative fistula formation occurs at a higher rate when performed prior to 6 months old. Furthermore, while the rate of VPI was not significantly affected by age at time of surgery, it was significantly higher in those who experienced a post-operative fistula.

Risk Factors for Readmission After Cleft Lip Repair

BACKGROUND

Cleft lip is the most common craniofacial malformation with an incidence of 1 in 700 live births. Our study sought to evaluate incidences and risk factors readmission following CLP repair using a well-validated national surgical database.

METHODS

All cleft lip repairs performed between 2012 and 2016 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric Database. Patient demographics, surgical variables, and reasons for readmission were analyzed and identified. A binary logistic regression was performed to identify factors independently associated with readmission following cleft lip repair.

RESULTS

The 4550 cleft lip repairs were identified with a thirty-day readmission rate of 3.8% (173 patients). A higher incidence of readmission was identified among patients with developmental delay (P ≤0.001), seizure disorder (P <0.001), structural central nervous system abnormality (P ≤0.001), steroid use within 30 days (P ≤0.001), a requirement for nutritional support (P <0.001), and ASA of 3 or higher (17.3% vs 9.9%, P <0.001). Readmitted patients were more likely to have deep incisional surgical site infections (P <0.001), deep wound dehiscence (P = 0.002), reoperation (P <0.001), pneumonia (P <0.001), and unplanned intubation (P <0.001).Multivariate regression identified seizure disorder (OR = 3.3; 95% CI = 1.3-8.3; P = 0.012) and steroid use within 30 days (OR = 3.8; 95% CI = 1.1-12.2; P = 0.030) as independently associated with readmission. The mean time of readmission was 9 days after operation.

CONCLUSION

Patients with seizure disorder and steroid use were significantly more likely to be readmitted. Physicians should be cautious with management of patients with these risk factors.